Nymph Daphne and Tyrannis arrange a meeting to negotiate peace between the city and the forest; Hippocampus and Nymph Daphne hide out in Hippocampus' bunker.
Stupendous is the best character. Facing an enemy she has never seen before, it took one battle to create a plan and win. Been rooting for her all season
regarding negotiation, yes it has become the diplomatic norm that kings don't meet, also where you meet implies the powerballance, which is why most peacetreaties are signed on neutral teritory, and many others are signed in the capitals of whomever had the clear edge good examples are the treaty of ghent which ended the war between the USA and brittish empire (the 1812 one if i remember correctly) whilst another example is the 1604 treaty of london which ended the war between England and Spanish empire, specifically given the pyrhic victory of the Spanish empire over the town of Oostende (the casualties relative to the total population at the time are similar to those of ww1 and that was despite oostende being a mere porttown (though a very heavily fortified one) held by the republic of the 7 netherlands with brittish aid, the siege lasted for years and after gradually taking the outer and inner fortifications the few defenders left had erected a literal wall of dirt and corpses in the center, though they surrendered after being offered fair terms.
No; it’s more like a “friends with benefits,” “sex with no strings attached,” “DTF,” or a “situation-ship” type of scenario. Basically, the first historical recording of all of these!😆🤣
segs is never meaningless, lust is not a sin because of religious mumbo jumbo but because it and every other supposed sin was rational as excessiveness tends to upset the ballance within society (rich/poor, Man/woman, ...) for humans intimacy and orgasm causes oxytocin to be released which causes you to bond with someone, it also get's released when seeing, touching something cute like a puppy. what happens when you get it every 3 days from different people, you end up being unable to effectively bond as you get addicted to it. no different than any other drugg and given that you failed to actually bond with anyone you simply cheat. which is why infdelity should be shamed, not seen as some twisted right.
"segs is never meaningless, lust is not a sin because of religious mumbo jumbo but because it and every other supposed sin was rational as excessiveness tends to upset the ballance within society (rich/poor, Man/woman, ...) " That seems more like attacking the symptom rather than the cause, if rich, pretty and powerful people get more fun times, it's not because fun times cause an imbalance, the imbalance it's already there, only if we attack those divides everybody would be able to get an equal amount of fun times. I feel the need to point this out because saying fun times are the problem doesn't actually get rid of the inequality, it's just a way to control us and prevent us from attacking the actual roots of inequality; look at it this way: people in power can affort to break the rules, we can't, so, why are we making rules that only hurt us? That's not to say we should go around murdering people just because rich people do it, that's some Marquis de Sade bullshit, but if the rule is only made because we don't like what a powerful person is doing (again, I'm talking simply about things that are only bad because they cause envy, not something that is actually bad, like r .ape), then that rule is useless because we don't have any way to enforce it and they can use it against us. This doesn't apply to rules that actually deal with the issue, obviously; monopolies are a cause of many problems and, while rules against monopolies are rules made specifically with rich people in mind, THEY ARE rules that CAN be enfonrced (by other rich people who think "If I can't have it, you neither"; but, regardless of the reasons they have, the overall outcome is good for the average citizen). "what happens when you get it every 3 days from different people, you end up being unable to effectively bond as you get addicted to it. no different than any other drugg and given that you failed to actually bond with anyone you simply cheat. which is why infdelity should be shamed, not seen as some twisted right." I mean, I wouldn't care if my partner wanted to have sex with someone else? I would only mind if they liked it better then me. All things being equal, I've had a lot of sex in my life, and maybe I'm suffering from what you're describing, but the truth of the matter is sex doesn't really feel as special to me anymore, and I don't mean it as "I will keep looking for new partners everyday so everytime feels like the first time", because the truth of the matter is that doing so is just a pointless pursuit, there are things in this world that are worth way more than sex. So, if I ever find a partner that feels like me I wouldn't care if he has sex with other people (as long as he informs me, uses protection and gets checked regularly) because I will know he doesn't really care about said sex, the both of us will have an emotional intimacy that will go way beyond that. Don't get me wrong I think cheating is bad, but if you define infidelity as simply having sex with someone that isn't your partner, then I don't think infidelity is always cheating. Cheating is bad because it means doing something behind your partners back that you know they would reprove of, or doing something right on their face that you know they don't like. But some people just don't care whether their partner is sleeping with someone else or not. Yeah, I believe that if someone is polyamorous they should just look for someone just like them, not try to force their monogamous partner to accept them. Similarly, if you're monogamous you should look for someone just like you, instead of forcing your partner to be monogamus. This idea of trying to change our partners just because we want them to be with us is very damaging, people should learn to move on.
Stupendous is the best character. Facing an enemy she has never seen before, it took one battle to create a plan and win. Been rooting for her all season
Her brother is the one who invented the plan to win.
I love them together there so cute
The flowers had names!!!!
regarding negotiation, yes it has become the diplomatic norm that kings don't meet,
also where you meet implies the powerballance, which is why most peacetreaties are signed on neutral teritory, and many others are signed in the capitals of whomever had the clear edge
good examples are the treaty of ghent which ended the war between the USA and brittish empire (the 1812 one if i remember correctly)
whilst another example is the 1604 treaty of london which ended the war between England and Spanish empire, specifically given the pyrhic victory of the Spanish empire over the town of Oostende (the casualties relative to the total population at the time are similar to those of ww1 and that was despite oostende being a mere porttown (though a very heavily fortified one) held by the republic of the 7 netherlands with brittish aid, the siege lasted for years and after gradually taking the outer and inner fortifications the few defenders left had erected a literal wall of dirt and corpses in the center, though they surrendered after being offered fair terms.
"are those poisonous?"
"A pain in the ass is what they are." Killed me😂
Hippocampus and Daphne are secretly dating?
No; it’s more like a “friends with benefits,” “sex with no strings attached,” “DTF,” or a “situation-ship” type of scenario.
Basically, the first historical recording of all of these!😆🤣
1st and 10th beer is free!! 😂
Fuck dude! I would so fall for that. 🤣🤣🤣
lol pan would have been royally pissed off if he found out about zeus, I think. then again maybe not he is pretty open
Lol they really made it like the cold war. Mutual destruction with gods instead of nukes
That’s pretty creative
Gods are jerks!
The wolves being part of the enemy Force only makes a little bit of sense especially since the episode where wolves and humans became friends
I don't think the wolves and humans being friends is canon until the next season.
Must be a shape of water situation.
Bye Felicians 😂
How are yall putting these up without getting flagged lol
Fox is embarrassed by this cartoon. It was greenlit back in 2021 to promote Dan Harmon's NFTs. But by the time it came to air they were worthless.
@@brainflash1 I don’t know anything about NFT’s, but I do like the show.
@@Lethal_Giggles Then you know more about NFTs than Dan Harmon does.
Troy and abed in the morning
Bunny Reaction: 🤢🤮🤢🤢🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮
That's not a beard. That is a goatee. The people that call it a beard have no facial hair.
segs is never meaningless, lust is not a sin because of religious mumbo jumbo but because it and every other supposed sin was rational as excessiveness tends to upset the ballance within society (rich/poor, Man/woman, ...)
for humans intimacy and orgasm causes oxytocin to be released which causes you to bond with someone, it also get's released when seeing, touching something cute like a puppy.
what happens when you get it every 3 days from different people, you end up being unable to effectively bond as you get addicted to it. no different than any other drugg and given that you failed to actually bond with anyone you simply cheat.
which is why infdelity should be shamed, not seen as some twisted right.
"segs is never meaningless, lust is not a sin because of religious mumbo jumbo but because it and every other supposed sin was rational as excessiveness tends to upset the ballance within society (rich/poor, Man/woman, ...) "
That seems more like attacking the symptom rather than the cause, if rich, pretty and powerful people get more fun times, it's not because fun times cause an imbalance, the imbalance it's already there, only if we attack those divides everybody would be able to get an equal amount of fun times.
I feel the need to point this out because saying fun times are the problem doesn't actually get rid of the inequality, it's just a way to control us and prevent us from attacking the actual roots of inequality; look at it this way: people in power can affort to break the rules, we can't, so, why are we making rules that only hurt us? That's not to say we should go around murdering people just because rich people do it, that's some Marquis de Sade bullshit, but if the rule is only made because we don't like what a powerful person is doing (again, I'm talking simply about things that are only bad because they cause envy, not something that is actually bad, like r .ape), then that rule is useless because we don't have any way to enforce it and they can use it against us.
This doesn't apply to rules that actually deal with the issue, obviously; monopolies are a cause of many problems and, while rules against monopolies are rules made specifically with rich people in mind, THEY ARE rules that CAN be enfonrced (by other rich people who think "If I can't have it, you neither"; but, regardless of the reasons they have, the overall outcome is good for the average citizen).
"what happens when you get it every 3 days from different people, you end up being unable to effectively bond as you get addicted to it. no different than any other drugg and given that you failed to actually bond with anyone you simply cheat.
which is why infdelity should be shamed, not seen as some twisted right."
I mean, I wouldn't care if my partner wanted to have sex with someone else? I would only mind if they liked it better then me. All things being equal, I've had a lot of sex in my life, and maybe I'm suffering from what you're describing, but the truth of the matter is sex doesn't really feel as special to me anymore, and I don't mean it as "I will keep looking for new partners everyday so everytime feels like the first time", because the truth of the matter is that doing so is just a pointless pursuit, there are things in this world that are worth way more than sex. So, if I ever find a partner that feels like me I wouldn't care if he has sex with other people (as long as he informs me, uses protection and gets checked regularly) because I will know he doesn't really care about said sex, the both of us will have an emotional intimacy that will go way beyond that.
Don't get me wrong I think cheating is bad, but if you define infidelity as simply having sex with someone that isn't your partner, then I don't think infidelity is always cheating. Cheating is bad because it means doing something behind your partners back that you know they would reprove of, or doing something right on their face that you know they don't like. But some people just don't care whether their partner is sleeping with someone else or not.
Yeah, I believe that if someone is polyamorous they should just look for someone just like them, not try to force their monogamous partner to accept them. Similarly, if you're monogamous you should look for someone just like you, instead of forcing your partner to be monogamus. This idea of trying to change our partners just because we want them to be with us is very damaging, people should learn to move on.