Velikost videa: 1280 X 720853 X 480640 X 360
Zobrazit ovladače přehrávání
Automatické přehrávání
Přehrát
What a peace of knowledge!
3:00 look closely in slow motion date doesnt change instantaneous rather it slowly moves between 4-5 slowly before 12am Would have been icing on cake if it had instantaneous jump
Beautiful watch
Indeed!
Thank you for this!
No problem!
maybe it's just me but the day/night indicator switching at 6a/6p is a bit confusing...otherwise nearly perfect
It can be confusing, I get you there. But, I guess they just took the generally accepted day/night time, when working on the complication. Keep well!
Rolex GMT master is the same. The bicolour bezel assumes that it’s day from 6 am to 6pm.
@@Classical416 True, but the GMT Master goes from 6 to 18, the 24hr scale is more intuitive, at least to me
No hacking seconds ? If a watch has a second hand, it MUST have hacking seconds to set it accurately. (IMO). Otherwise, why even have a seconds hand?
That’s what’s been so annoying about those Patek movements. You’re 100% right. Hacking seconds should be in all movements of this type.
It’s not needed. The seconds hand never stays accurate anyway. Get a quartz if you want 100% accuracy
Fascinating movement. Ugly watch though!
How much ths Patek?
Check on Patek website
£27,000
Unwearable
Does it hack?
nope
What a peace of knowledge!
3:00 look closely in slow motion date doesnt change instantaneous rather it slowly moves between 4-5 slowly before 12am
Would have been icing on cake if it had instantaneous jump
Beautiful watch
Indeed!
Thank you for this!
No problem!
maybe it's just me but the day/night indicator switching at 6a/6p is a bit confusing...otherwise nearly perfect
It can be confusing, I get you there. But, I guess they just took the generally accepted day/night time, when working on the complication. Keep well!
Rolex GMT master is the same. The bicolour bezel assumes that it’s day from 6 am to 6pm.
@@Classical416 True, but the GMT Master goes from 6 to 18, the 24hr scale is more intuitive, at least to me
No hacking seconds ? If a watch has a second hand, it MUST have hacking seconds to set it accurately. (IMO). Otherwise, why even have a seconds hand?
That’s what’s been so annoying about those Patek movements. You’re 100% right. Hacking seconds should be in all movements of this type.
It’s not needed. The seconds hand never stays accurate anyway. Get a quartz if you want 100% accuracy
Fascinating movement. Ugly watch though!
How much ths Patek?
Check on Patek website
£27,000
Unwearable
Does it hack?
nope