Manchester United 2009/2010 - Season Review Part 2
Vložit
- čas přidán 29. 04. 2023
- Manchester United - 2009/2010 Season Review
Please comment with what team you want to see next
Like, Subscribe and Share
📺 Video presented by Golden Goal Comps
#manchesterunited #manutd #ronaldo
Credits:
Music: Endgame by Soundridemusic
Link to Video: • Epic Cinematic Adventu...
Credits:
Music: Phobia by Soundridemusic
Link to Video: • Tense Cinematic NoCopy...
Credits:
Music: Ticking Tension by Soundridemusic
Link to Video: • Ticking Tension Traile...
About Music Track:
Music: The Heist by Soundridemusic
Link to Video: • Tension Cinematic NoCo...
Copyright: GOLOVACH, VOLODYMYR
Publisher: Songtrust Blvd IPI #615755145
P.R.O.: IPI# 00382646438
CREDITS:
The Inspiration by Keys of Moon | / keysofmoon
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
creativecommons.org/licenses/...
Music promoted by www.chosic.com/free-music/all/
"Scott Buckley - Goliath" is under a Creative Commons (CC BY 3.0) license.
/ musicbyscottb
Music promoted by BreakingCopyright: • 🕕 6 Minutes of EPIC (F...
I must state that in NO way, shape or form am I intending to infringe rights of the copyright holder. Content used is strictly for research/reviewing purposes and to help educate. All under the Fair Use law.
Music Info: Endgame - SoundrideMusic
Copyright: GOLOVACH, VOLODYMYR
Publisher: Songtrust Blvd IPI# 615755145
P.R.O.: IPI# 00382646438
Music Link: • Epic Cinematic Adventu...
Content is both TRANSFORMATIVE and EDUCATIONAL in nature.
Content is in compliance with Content Quality section of YPP Policies as the editing adds creative value which makes content unique.
"Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use - Sport
Rooney with 99 heading that season
And he wasn't even that tall
Chelsea won the league witha point,Drogbas goal was offside but people this century say United were always flavoured lol
Macheda goal was handball
@@chelseacomps4377So....??
That apparently makes up for Rooney being flagged offside at 0-0 at Stamford bridge when clean through ONside, A.Valencia fouled in box at 0-0 same game by JT right infront of Martin Atkinson no pen given, Chelsea's goal should've been disallowed for no fewer than 3 reasons Cashley dived, Drogba shoved down W.Brown WHILST standing in offside position effecting VanDerSar's view as freekick finds it's way in confusion as to who got final touch goal was eventually given to JT finished 1-0 to Chelsea.
OldTrafford game at 0-1 ParkJiSung was fouled in the box by Zhirkov no pen given, ManUtd could've equalised with that pen in first half and had the momentum to go on to win a game they only needed to draw it was Chelsea who NEEDED to win BOTH head-to-heads and were 2nd best in both but bailed out by refs because PL didn't want same champion 4 years in a row. ManUtd dominated all of SB game & all but 20mins of OT game. Drogba scored against the run of play and offside Rooney had just got injured and missed the game. Who gives a shit about B-player Macheda's consolation goal with 9mins to go and still losing???? It had no effect on the table unlike all the other decisions mentioned.
@@FootkerSnookball it means the title would have gone down to goal difference meaning Chelsea would have won the league as we had a superior goal difference
@@kirkham111 Who cares about goal difference when ManUtd would've had more POINTS.
Plus Chelsea didn't have better GD or certainly there was barely anything in it at that stage.
Remember Chelsea were only given that fake superior GD in the last few games (a 7-0 & 8-0 in the last 3) when the league wanted to disguise the controversial manner Chelsea squeezed above ManUtd after controversial home&away wins that Chelsea were 2nd best in both but needed a series or poor decisions especially at Stamford bridge and like I've already stated. The B-player Macheda goal you can take that back no issue with me. I'll have the flag NOT going up in Nov2009 at Stamford bridge at 0-0 when Rooney is clean through, or the pen when A.Valencia was fouled in the box at 0-0 by JT, or JT's illegal goal disallowed actually not given to Chelsea for any 1 of the 3 reasons it shouldn't have been....or the pen at 0-1 at OldTrafford when Zhirkov fouled ParkJiSung....I should get all of these things but I'm only asking for 1 and then that's fine you can take back Macheda's goal and ManUtd are still champions.
You're a delusional Chelsea fan. How were Chelsea fantastic "throughout" that season?? Fantastic to lose to Wigan?? Fantastic to struggle home&away vs Hull??
Chelsea wouldn't have needed both ManUtd wins so much if they were so good. ManUtd didn't but they deserved it but ManUtd get 1 draw in either and they win by a bigger margin than Chelsea ending up doing by cheating ManUtd all the points.
@@FootkerSnookball🤡
How many of Rooneys goals were headers? Seemed to score an unreal amount that season
most of Gibson's goals were utter hammers, dayuum 😄
1:12 The goalkeeper chilling on grass😄
WR10 headed goals 12 or13😮
Rooney scored so many headed goals that he went bald
Nah mate was going bald at the age of 10😂
Drogba's goal was offside, but people forget how Man. United failed to win at Blackburn in a crucial game.
Macheda was a handball
@@kirkham111 All you're doing by constantly obsessing about that meaningless Macheda goal (that is COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT to the point) is reminding everyone how even more lucky Chelsea were that Rooney missed this match due to injury hence players like Macheda even being involved.
@@kirkham111 Ironic you called me a bot who just repeats same things. If I do repeat at least I still make a point and don't keep repeating the same useless comment on every comment section.
TAKE AWAY the Macheda goal NO PROBLEM but give ManUtd the 3 points Chelsea stole from them controversially at Stamford bridge Nov2009 or just give ManUtd the pen they also should've had in this OldTrafford game vs Chelsea at 0-1 first half. ManUtd win the title then by WAY more than Chelsea ended up doing and Macheda doesn't need to score that MEANINGLESS consolation goal.
Hell if you give ManUtd the deserved win at Stamford bridge you can even keep that ridiculous Drogba offside as well if you want!
@FootkerSnookball Macheda goal was handball. Stop moving the goal post. Take away Macheda handball and take away Drogba's offside goal and Cheslea would still win 1-0. It evens out. Keep it moving.
@@user-lj6jp8qp7z Then learn how to read. Chelsea neededa completely fixed win vs ManUtd at Stamford bridge with many more bad offside & penalty decisions.
But nothing from that game was evened out at OldTrafford because Chelsea got favoured by bad decisions at the right times. ManUtd should've had a pen in first half at 0-1 that was the first bad decisions of the game. ManUtd only needed 1 point from both games combined, Chelsea needed 2 wins deserved 2 losses got given 2 wins won PLby 1 point. I'm not repeating again to simpletons.
If ManUtd would've won a PL title like that you'd never hear the end of it from anti-ManUtd fans.
Where is part 3? This is for me when the United squad started to look concerning apart from the core squad of bout 13 players a rb cb and lb competition for evra was needed we just got 80 million for cr7
part 2 end is end of the season!
Could have easily had 4 titles in a row
Oh well
@titleinislington
Would've been 5 in a row with VAR 2006/07 to 2010/11.
Would've also been 5 in a row with VAR 1996/97 to 2000/01 (I should say 6 because ManUtd won in 1995/96 but I can't honestly say I've seen all the main highlights or full 90minute matches to that season to know for sure that ManUtd didn't have more decisions than the closest challengers Newcastle that season but what I do know is that in the 2 games against Newcastle which basically decided the title just like the 2 games vs Arsenal & ManUtd in 97/98 did (where Arsenal needed decisions to win at Highbury) and likewise this 2009/10 season where Chelsea needed to cheat ManUtd home&away to stand any chance and ManCity 2011/12 also had to beat ManUtd home&away to stand any chance but ManUtd 95/96 vs Newcastle at OldTrafford ManUtd dominated and comfortably beat Newcastle deservedly it was 2-0 the least ManUtd deserved and both goals were valid and the away game it may have been lucky that Newcastle weren't clinical at 0-0 but there were no big incorrect game changing decisions and ManUtd's winning goal was perfectly legitimate.
In 2009/10 ManUtd would've honestly broken a PL points winning margin record if they got half the help Chelsea got that season. There were 3 main factors for me why it was so fixed for Chelsea to win (1) The PL doesn't want a team to win 4 in a row it looks too predictable boring when branded the best most unpredictable league in the world (2) Abramovich Chelsea era they didn't just buy players they bought refs (3) Chelsea would've still lost the title despite being favoured all year but it also happened to be the first year ManUtd could overtake Liverpool on overall league title's and Liverpool faced Chelsea on penultimate game knowing they needed Chelsea to win for Liverpool to not be overtaken hence Gerrard's deliberate backpass to Drogba at 0-0.
istg gibson only score bangers
How has this channel stayed hidden?
Will Leicester City 15/16 next??
It should be up in the next few weeks
Where United robbed of the title? The answer is no because the goal they scored against Chelsea was handball. Take Drogba offside goal away and take the handball away from United and Chelsea would still win the game 1-0.
It wasn’t handball. It hit his stomach
@iPro3million
Macheda's was handball but it has no relevance to anything. Chelsea got an extremely controversial and underserved 1-0 win vs ManUtd in Nov2009. Rooney flagged offside when clean through ONside, Valencia fouled in the box by JT also at 0-0.
Chelsea's late winner should've been disallowed for no fewer than 3 reasons. With VAR it was a comfortable win for ManUtd they dominated. Then the title race would've been comfortably won by ManUtd.
Even at OldTrafford vs Chelsea I really don't see how anything was evened out for what happened at Stamford bridge no instead the decisions favoured Chelsea again not as blatantly but they got the decisions at the right times to win a game THEY needed to but ManUtd didn't. If ParkJiSung gets the pen at 0-1 first half ManUtd can equalise in the first half and have all the momentum and time to win a game they only need to draw. Chelsea fans clutch at straws so badly to even bring up Macheda's hand goal with only 9mins to go and still losing which effected no points in the table unlike the series of poor decisions Chelsea favoured from.
Can i have mu 2010-2011 Please
Yes will upload in next few weeks
How many assists did Nani make in this season
Robbed by Atkinson
I guess SAF forgot to pay the refs that season
Upload Chelsea season review 2009/10
Just to see bad decisions galore favouring Chelsea lol
@@FootkerSnookball what like United under Ferguson
@@kirkham111 No
@@kirkham111 It's crazy the amount of times Chelsea needed bad decisions in the Abramovic era to win trophies yet their fans would always try any lame excuse to pretend to justify why it was fair when it simply WASN'T.
If ManUtd got dodgy decisions which EVERY team get but people overhype ManUtd one's more because they prefer a different narrative, especially in high profile games (which didn't happen often) I would be praying we don't go on and win something from it and am proud to say we never did. We got some in the 04/05 season vs Arsenal & Spurs (even though I liked getting revenge for the thuggery on v.Nistelrooy the year earlier and PedroMendes has had more than enough refereeing help at OldTrafford for various clubs like Porto & Portsmouth that have actually given him honours & lost them for ManUtd, plus Chelsea scored offside goal vs ManUtd at OldTrafford that season as well) I was still delighted we didn't even climb to 2nd following those games let alone win anything and we didn't cost anyone else anything big either whether it be trophy or CL place judging by how far in front or behind others were so it had no significance which I was pleased with as it made it a non-issue (to smart people anyway, I know there's still a bunch of idiots pretending it mattered more than it did) and also ManUtd finished 3rd 04/05 16pts in front of 4th so would've blatantly been 3rd anyway that season.
But if you go back to April2003 you could tell Arsenal wouldn't have cared if that ThierryHenry offside brace they scored in a potential title decider against ManUtd had cost ManUtd the title & won it for them because after Arsenal scored those dodgy goals Arsenal were given a red near the end for a stupid elbow and were protesting way too much for a team that's just been given 2 offside goals against their closest title rivals in a close title race. Just like they didn't care when they needed to beat ManUtd home&away in 97/98 and got decisions in their 3-2 win at Highbury.
I couldn't do what Arsenal & Chelsea do (or did when they were ManUtd's biggest trophy rivals). They don't care or cringe when they win things via decisions and they act like such babies the much fewer times when they don't get their way.
If Chelsea were as great as they claim in 2009/10 they would've still been able to win the title if it was roles reversed and it was Chelsea cheated all the head-to-head points home&away. But if that was the case ManUtd would've won at a canter even with a squad that on paper wasn't as strong as it had been for about 5 years but still would've broken the record points winning margin if given half the help Chelsea were.
I know Chelsea still got dodgy decisions that season on their side that gave them extra points they wouldn't have got at home to the likes of Hull (they were losing 0-1 and then equalised with a wrongly awarded freekick & scored a fluke cross winner in stoppage-time to win 2-1, Spurs 3-0 in the end but key no pen decision when Carvalho fouled RobbieKeane when the score was only 1-0 shortly before Chelsea then made it 2-0, Bolton should've had 2 pens at 0-0 Chelsea only won 1-0 and away to Birmingham Drogba was faking injury on the floor as per usual but in his own box and while doing so his leg played everyone onside when Birmingham scored but it was wrongly disallowed for offside, finished 0-0. PLUS Liverpool didn't even try on penultimate game (unlike when ManUtd went there obviously) because it was the first year ManUtd could overtake Liverpool on league title's & Liverpool had nothing to play for by then hence Gerrard's deliberate backpass to Drogba at 0-0.
I expected all that especially in Abramovic era and after ManUtd had just 3-peated (fairly) I get the PL wanted a different champion as it's branded most unpredictable exciting league in the world and same winner all the time doesn't promote that but for me you still have to be the best. ManCity won't be robbed of a record 4th PL title in a row this year with VAR if they're still the best this season they will get to win. Which is unfair now looking at seasons such as 2009/10.
For Chelsea to ALSO take ALL the head-to-head points was just ridiculous, where ManUtd were the better team for the entire Stamford bridge game robbed all 3 (6point swing) & the decisions also favoured Chelsea at OldTrafford at the right times for Chelsea to get this much needed win as well. Don't forget ParkJiSung also should've had a pen at 0-1 in the first half when Zhirkov fouled him and ManUtd dominated all but the first 20mins of this game they only needed to draw even without the pen but equalising in the first half and the momentum ManUtd would've then had to go on and win a must win game for Chelsea not ManUtd.
The goals Chelsea go on about weren't significant either.
With just 3 games remaining the points difference was the same as what it finished (1) there was only 3GD in it. That's AFTER Chelsea needed to cheat home&away vs ManUtd who should've had the points instead so ManUtd mathematically would've already been crowned champions at least 3 games before the season finished and would've also had better GD than Chelsea. ManUtd also in the last 3 games won them vs Spurs 3-1, Sunderland 0-1 & Stoke 4-0 adding a further +7GD to their tally yet Chelsea in the last 3 games manage to gain +10GD on ManUtd???? I found that very fishy. Like the league knew if Chelsea were going to win the title it was only going to be after cheating ManUtd so it seems they were GIVEN emphatic scorelines last few games and fake GD to try to disguise them as worthy winners and overshadow the controversy of this PL season. If you notice it's only the extra few goals they scored at home vs weak opposition who would also be handicapped early sending off and everything on Chelsea's side.
Because Chelsea & ManUtd finished on same number of wins (27) Chelsea actually had more wins by only 1 goal until the penultimate week where ManUtd then won 0-1 at Sunderland and Chelsea were given a 0-2 vs Liverpool and then it finished both Chelsea & ManUtd with the same number of wins by 1 goal (8 each, but if you look at all of Chelsea's there were more where they shouldn't have won than ManUtd).
Chelsea & ManUtd also had the same number of wins by 2 or more goals (19 each, but ManUtd had more away)
Chelsea & ManUtd had the same number of wins by 3 or more goals (13 each, but ManUtd had more away)
Chelsea only had 1 more win by 4 or more goals than ManUtd (Chelsea 8-7 ManUtd) but ManUtd had 1 more win than Chelsea by 4 or more away (ManUtd 3-2 Chelsea)
Chelsea & ManUtd had the same number of away wins by 5 or more (1 each, both 0-5. ManUtd's was against 16th Wigan, Chelsea's was against the rock bottom team Portsmouth).
Obviously away games are harder and you're less favoured away hence me mentioning about ManUtd doing better away than Chelsea (and everyone else).
So yeah the goals they bang on about were a handful of these types of home games like 7-0 vs Stoke where Kalou injured their goalkeeper early on when he should've been sent off for a 2 footed lunge it wasn't punished and his goal in that same incident still stood, inexperienced Stoke GK had to play the rest of the game, there would've been pens etc...just like in the 8-0 vs Wigan an early pen & red card to away team, another pen later and another game where Chelsea are being given goals where there were fouls in the build-up and Chelsea were just going for more & more goals vs these handicapped teams including the last goal when J.Cole fouled and then carried on & assisted Cashley to give them emphatic flattering looking scorelines & goal difference to make up for the fact that they were only scraping it by 1 point after having to cheat the real best team. ManUtd still comfortably won such fixtures 4-0 & 5-0 honest scorelines and one's that ManUtd would regularly get vs such teams, Chelsea's results were very abnormal from how they would usually struggle in other seasons vs the same teams I.e 2008/09 Chelsea 2-1 Stoke (Chelsea stoppage-time winner) and Chelsea 2-1 Wigan (Chelsea stoppage-time winner) and a season after 09/10,
2010/11 Chelsea 1-0 Wigan, Chelsea 2-0 Stoke
Where as ManUtd from 2005 to 2013 all years Wigan were in the PL would not just beat but thrash them to nil very regularly (& in other competitions) and they handled Stoke the best out of any PL team had fantastic record vs them.
You also wouldn't think from the way Chelsea go on about how many they scored in 2009/10 that ManUtd still had the best aggregate PL goal margin. Chelsea didn't have any more than aggregate win by 8 goals where as ManUtd's biggest aggregate was 10-0 (0-5 & 5-0 vs Wigan). Chelsea lost to Wigan away & struggled home&away vs relegated Hull and were very lucky to come away with 4pts vs them. ManUtd had an almost flawless record vs the bottom 7 teams so many goals for hardly any against 13 wins out of 14, Burnley away was their only one ManUtd didn't win which happened to be Burnley's first ever PL home game which is unique atmosphere for away team and their goal was more Top4 team worthy. Chelsea got Burnley away at a good time mid-season and still only just won that late on. ManUtd also did the best vs the Top teams despite being cheated home&away by Chelsea because Chelsea lost home&away to ManCity and away to Spurs. Remember in Nov09 Chelsea 1-0 ManUtd at 0-0 Rooney is clean through ONside and linesman sticks flag up, A.Valencia was also blatantly fouled in box by JT no pen given Martin Atkinson had great view and Chelsea's goal should've been disallowed for no fewer than 3 reasons and ManUtd dominated.
Chelsea only did the best vs the mid-table teams with less to play for, hence why some even threw the game vs them.
@@FootkerSnookball you’re a bot reposting the same boring comment
Can I have Manchester United 1999, please?
Yes coming soon
No, chelsea were brilliant throughout the season, you don’t score 100+ goals and get accused of robbing another team of the title
that goal by drogba that was offside...chalk that off, game ends 1-1,,,and united are winning that season by 86 points with chelsea having 84....that small mistake by the linesman ultimately made the difference at the season's end...yes chelsea had a good season but not by much..they scored 103 goals but united still had the best defensive record...and chelsea still lost quite some points on the way there just as united did coz i mean...it's not like they were almost faultless getting 98 plus points that liverpool and city have been doing the past 6 years...the two teams performed on almost close levels...there wasn't much between them at the end...as seen by the fact that chelsea's gd was just 12 more than united's...just admit it man..united were robbed in broad daylight
@@skichyyymacheda goal was handball take it away and it is 1-0 and table looks the same
@@chelseacomps4377 dude...the damage was already done by then...whether macheda's goal would have been allowed or not, chelsea were still 2 goals up...ever heard of flogging a dead horse?...that's like saying an insult made to a person who is dead matters...who tf cares?...the person's dead already
@kirkham111
It's crazy the amount of times Chelsea needed bad decisions in the Abramovic era to win trophies yet their fans would always try any lame excuse to pretend to justify why it was fair when it simply WASN'T.
If ManUtd got dodgy decisions which EVERY team get but people overhype ManUtd one's more because they prefer a different narrative, especially in high profile games (which didn't happen often) I would be praying we don't go on and win something from it and am proud to say we never did. We got some in the 04/05 season vs Arsenal & Spurs (even though I liked getting revenge for the thuggery on v.Nistelrooy the year earlier and PedroMendes has had more than enough refereeing help at OldTrafford for various clubs like Porto & Portsmouth that have actually given him honours & lost them for ManUtd, plus Chelsea scored offside goal vs ManUtd at OldTrafford that season as well) I was still delighted we didn't even climb to 2nd following those games let alone win anything and we didn't cost anyone else anything big either whether it be trophy or CL place judging by how far in front or behind others were so it had no significance which I was pleased with as it made it a non-issue (to smart people anyway, I know there's still a bunch of idiots pretending it mattered more than it did) and also ManUtd finished 3rd 04/05 16pts in front of 4th so would've blatantly been 3rd anyway that season.
But if you go back to April2003 you could tell Arsenal wouldn't have cared if that ThierryHenry offside brace they scored in a potential title decider against ManUtd had cost ManUtd the title & won it for them because after Arsenal scored those dodgy goals Arsenal were given a red near the end for a stupid elbow and were protesting way too much for a team that's just been given 2 offside goals against their closest title rivals in a close title race. Just like they didn't care when they needed to beat ManUtd home&away in 97/98 and got decisions in their 3-2 win at Highbury.
I couldn't do what Arsenal & Chelsea do (or did when they were ManUtd's biggest trophy rivals). They don't care or cringe when they win things via decisions and they act like such babies the much fewer times when they don't get their way.
If Chelsea were as great as they claim in 2009/10 they would've still been able to win the title if it was roles reversed and it was Chelsea cheated all the head-to-head points home&away. But if that was the case ManUtd would've won at a canter even with a squad that on paper wasn't as strong as it had been for about 5 years but still would've broken the record points winning margin if given half the help Chelsea were.
I know Chelsea still got dodgy decisions that season on their side that gave them extra points they wouldn't have got at home to the likes of Hull, Spurs (finished 3-0 in the end but key decision when score was only 1-0), Bolton etc... away to Birmingham etc... PLUS Liverpool didn't even try on penultimate game (unlike when ManUtd went there obviously) because it was the first year ManUtd could overtake Liverpool on league title's & Liverpool had nothing to play for by then hence Gerrard's deliberate backpass to Drogba at 0-0.
I expected all that especially in Abramovic era and after ManUtd had just 3-peated (fairly) I get the PL wanted a different champion as it's branded most unpredictable exciting league in the world and same winner all the time doesn't promote that but for me you still have to be the best. ManCity won't be robbed of a record 4th PL title in a row this year with VAR if they're still the best this season they will get to win. Which is unfair now looking at seasons such as 2009/10.
For Chelsea to ALSO take ALL the head-to-head points was just ridiculous, where ManUtd were the better team for the entire Stamford bridge game robbed all 3 (6point swing) & the decisions also favoured Chelsea at OldTrafford at the right times for Chelsea to get this much needed win as well. Don't forget ParkJiSung also should've had a pen at 0-1 in the first half when Zhirkov fouled him and ManUtd dominated all but the first 20mins of this game they only needed to draw even without the pen but equalising in the first half and the momentum ManUtd would've then had to go on and win a must win game for Chelsea not ManUtd.
The goals Chelsea go on about werent significant either.
With just 3 games remaining the points difference was the same as what it finished (1) there was only 3GD in it. That's AFTER Chelsea needed to cheat home&away vs ManUtd so ManUtd mathematically would've already been crowned champions by then and would've also had better GD than Chelsea. ManUtd also in the last 3 games won them and added a further +7GD to their tally yet Chelsea in the last 3 games manage to gain +10 on ManUtd???? I found that very fishy. Like the league knew if Chelsea were going to win the title it was only going to be after cheating ManUtd so it seems they were GIVEN emphatic scorelines last few games and fake GD to try to disguise them as worthy winners and overshadow the controversy of this PL season. If you notice it's only the extra few goals they scored at home vs weak opposition who would also be handicapped early sending off and everything on Chelsea's side.
Because Chelsea & ManUtd finished on same number of wins (27) Chelsea actually had more wins by only 1 goal until the penultimate week where ManUtd then won 0-1 at Sunderland and Chelsea were given a 0-2 vs Liverpool and then it finished both Chelsea & ManUtd with the same number of wins by 1 goal (but if you look at all of Chelsea's there were more where they shouldn't have won than ManUtd).
Chelsea & ManUtd also had the same number of wins by 2 or more goals (but ManUtd had more away)
Chelsea & ManUtd had the same number of wins by 3 or more goals (but ManUtd had more away)
Chelsea only had 1 more win by 4 or more goals than ManUtd but ManUtd had 1 more win than Chelsea by 4 or more away.
Chelsea & ManUtd had the same number of away wins by 5 or more (1 each, but ManUtd's was against 16th, Chelsea's was against the rock bottom team).
Obviously away games are harder and you're less favoured away hence me mentioning about ManUtd doing better away than Chelsea (and everyone else).
So yeah the goals they bang on about were a handful of these types of games like 7-0 vs Stoke where Kalou injured their goalkeeper early on when he should've been sent off for a 2 footed lunge it wasn't punished and his goal in that incident still stood, inexperienced Stoke GK has to play rest of the game, there would've been pens etc...just like in the 8-0 vs Wigan an early pen & red card to away team and another game where Chelsea are being given goals where there were fouls in the build-up and Chelsea were just going for more & more goals vs these handicapped teams to give them emphatic flattering looking scorelines & goal difference to make uo for the fact that they were only scraping it by a point after having to cheat the real best team. ManUtd still comfortably won such fixtures 4-0 & 5-0 honest scorelines and one's that ManUtd would regular get vs such teams, Chelsea's results were very abnormal from how they would usually struggle in other seasons vs the same teams I.e 2008/09 Chelsea 2-1 Stoke (Chelsea stoppage-time winner) and Chelsea 2-1 Wigan (Chelsea stoppage-time winner) and a season after 09/10,
2010/11 Chelsea 1-0 Wigan Chelsea 2-0 Stoke
Where as ManUtd from 2005 to 2013 all years Wigan were in the PL would noy just beat but thrash them to nil very regularly (& in other competitions) and they handled Stoke the best out of any PL team had fantastic record vs them.
You also wouldn't think from the way Chelsea go on about how many they scored in 2009/10 that ManUtd still had the best aggregate PL goal margin. Chelsea didn't have any more than aggregate win by 8 goals where as ManUtd's biggest aggregate was 10-0 (0-5 & 5-0 vs Wigan). Chelsea lost to Wigan & struggled home&away vs relegated Hull and were very lucky to come away with 4pts vs them. ManUtd had an almost flawless record vs the bottom 7 teams so many goals for hardly any against 13 wins out of 14, Burnley away was their only one ManUtd didn't win which happened to be Burnley's first ever PL home game which is unique atmosphere for away team and their goal was more Top4 team worthy. ManUtd also did the best vs the Top teams (despite being cheated home&away by Chelsea because Chelsea lost home&away to ManCity and away to Spurs. Remember in Nov09 Chelsea 1-0 ManUtd at 0-0 Rooney is clean through ONside and linesman sticks flag up, A.Valencia was also blatantly fouled in box by JT no pen given Martin Atkinson had great view and Chelsea's goal should've been disallowed for no fewer than 3 reasons).
Chelsea only did the best vs the mid-table teams with less to play for, hence why some even threw the game vs them.
Man United may have been robbed, the real question is how many league titles have they robbed? 😂
They weren’t robbed drogba may have been offside but macheda had a goal that was a handball meaning a goal difference title meaning Chelsea would have won it
@@kirkham111 Maths & you, never really hit it off right?
cope lol