Deriving Fourier Transform From Fourier Series

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 23. 08. 2024
  • Deriving Fourier Transform From Fourier Series
    Watch more videos at www.tutorialsp...
    Lecture By: Ms. Gowthami Swarna, Tutorials Point India Private Limited

Komentáře • 46

  • @TutorialsPoint_
    @TutorialsPoint_  Před rokem +1

    To Get Certification, Click Here: bit.ly/3oCIvLA
    Use coupon "CZcams12" to get ‘’FLAT 12%’’ OFF at Checkout.

  • @someoneelse2417
    @someoneelse2417 Před 3 lety +3

    Best explanation I've seen so far for deriving the fourier transform. She explains every step without omitting any detail. She understands it down to a fundamental level and is able to explain every step very clearly.

    • @arjunkailas4146
      @arjunkailas4146 Před 3 lety

      @Someone Else,
      Derivation was best explained.But final result obtained for "Inverse Fourier Transform" is wrong. (1/2*pi) term is missing in final result!

    • @vivekiyer9482
      @vivekiyer9482 Před 2 lety

      @@arjunkailas4146 When we write in term of Discrete time Fourier transform then X(w) = Summation -∞ to +∞ x(n) e^(-jwn)
      Am I right??

  • @keshavjangra9243
    @keshavjangra9243 Před 3 lety +9

    if w= 2 *pi*f then dw = 2*pi*df so if we want to change df by dw then we will write df = dw/2*pi .

  • @charnumberjhonny
    @charnumberjhonny Před 3 lety +6

    *gate aspirants like here*

  • @daniyalshahid4349
    @daniyalshahid4349 Před 5 lety +14

    Mam it seems you have skipped (1/2pi) in inverse fourier transform .

    • @asadmehasi6267
      @asadmehasi6267 Před 5 lety +2

      You're absolutely right.
      Instead of substituting delta f for 1/T, I would have substituted delta k= 2pi/T.
      Then as T tends to infinity then sum becomes an integral, delta k becomes dk and n*(delta k) becomes k.

    • @divyamadimi5484
      @divyamadimi5484 Před 4 lety

      Yes my doubt also the same

    • @vivekiyer9482
      @vivekiyer9482 Před 2 lety

      But in Discrete time Fourier transform then X(w) = Summation (-∞ to +∞) x(n) e^(-jwn)
      Am I right????

  • @xiaohanjiang334
    @xiaohanjiang334 Před 5 lety +7

    I do not understand how you get the summation into integration when T goes to infinity for the index K.

  • @sudiptoc506
    @sudiptoc506 Před 2 lety +1

    You should have explained the discrete to continuous conversion with the help of Riemann sum/ Newton's integral formula. And there in since the partition length has to be 2*pi/T the factor of 1/2*pi will appear. But overall nice explanation.

  • @praveenkumarbonthala2648
    @praveenkumarbonthala2648 Před 5 lety +1

    Thanks Madam explanation was good

  • @amadikechidera2613
    @amadikechidera2613 Před 9 měsíci

    Very easy to understand ❤

  • @poornimashanbhag7982
    @poornimashanbhag7982 Před 6 lety +2

    @ 2:25 Why T[Period of the signal] will change over summation?.. It is a periodic signal and why does the period change over summation?

    • @jessicalearnsthings9104
      @jessicalearnsthings9104 Před 4 lety

      because when you add different frequencies (in the summation from k= -\alpha to k=+\alpha, the frequency of the sum changes

    • @parameshvk_4208
      @parameshvk_4208 Před 3 lety

      @@jessicalearnsthings9104 if the time period doesn't changes (because periodic signal)how will the frequency change as f=1/T

  • @fear2321
    @fear2321 Před 5 lety +4

    hi to everybody, i need to derive of 2d fourier transform from fourier series does anybody can help me ?

  • @krishdholakia3828
    @krishdholakia3828 Před 4 lety

    What is t and T in this formula!! Please explain

  • @vivekiyer9482
    @vivekiyer9482 Před 2 lety

    If we write in Discrete time Fourier transform then X(w) = Summation (-∞ to +∞) x(n) e^(-jwn)
    Am I right????
    In this video it is showing about continuous time right??
    I am just confirming

  • @dineshchintapalli2323
    @dineshchintapalli2323 Před 3 lety

    Thanks

  • @MehediHasan-rw3ek
    @MehediHasan-rw3ek Před 5 lety +2

    Good

  • @mixmix862
    @mixmix862 Před 4 lety

    Thank you so much

  • @Melodybeatsss
    @Melodybeatsss Před 2 lety

    Nice👍👍👍

  • @vanamabhinaytinku6552
    @vanamabhinaytinku6552 Před 4 lety

    Thank you mam

  • @aayushikesharwani526
    @aayushikesharwani526 Před 4 lety

    I want derivation of fourier transforming property of thin lenses can you help?

  • @eraofknowledge986
    @eraofknowledge986 Před 3 lety

    U are so talkative

  • @manjeetchoudhary777
    @manjeetchoudhary777 Před 3 lety

    Why you not written the ∆f?

  • @durgaprasadtiwari3715
    @durgaprasadtiwari3715 Před 3 lety +1

    mam you have not cleared every step thanks

  • @umm-e-farwa3188
    @umm-e-farwa3188 Před 3 lety

    What if x(t) is real??

  • @keshavjangra9243
    @keshavjangra9243 Před 3 lety

    Why not f = 1/T

  • @navyasreeavula9158
    @navyasreeavula9158 Před 3 lety +1

    not at all understood the last step of Fourier transform derivation....

    • @arjunkailas4146
      @arjunkailas4146 Před 3 lety

      @Navya,
      For simple and best Derivation of FT formula from FS formula,
      Refer following CZcams video.
      Signals and Systems in Hindi, by Neeraj Raj Sir,Gate Academy Plus.
      Lecture-23, Time-3:3 to 17:0

    • @arjunkailas4146
      @arjunkailas4146 Před 3 lety

      @Navya,
      To understand simple mathematical meaning of Fourier Transform, plz refer following 2 CZcams Videos.
      (1)"Fourier Transform intuitively explained " by "Visualizing Math".
      (2)"Fourier Transform Intuition" by "Better Explained".

  • @keshavjangra9243
    @keshavjangra9243 Před 3 lety

    Why delta f is equal to 1/T

  • @rajkamalgupta2281
    @rajkamalgupta2281 Před 5 lety +2

    at many points explanation was incomplete

  • @quantummusic2322
    @quantummusic2322 Před 3 lety

    This is just mathematics ....not the actual concept

  • @parameshvk_4208
    @parameshvk_4208 Před 3 lety

    Sorry to say this Simply you mugged up this concept

  • @shriharig2235
    @shriharig2235 Před 3 lety

    Wrong derivation. This is not the F.T pair.

  • @harishsingh5491
    @harishsingh5491 Před 5 lety +1

    This is the most stupidest derivation to show that fourier transform is forurier series of a non periodic signal by taking time period of non periodic signal to be infinite.

    • @MrCadit
      @MrCadit Před 4 lety +4

      What is the smart way to show it? It's fair assumption to assume that the signal is repeating it self after the infinite period. This definitely shows that the signal is non-periodoic.

    • @arjunkailas4146
      @arjunkailas4146 Před 3 lety

      @@MrCadit
      Concept is good.But, final result obtained for " Inverse Fourier Transform " is wrong. (1/2*pi) term is missing in Final Result!