The Erechtheion (3D) -The old Palladas temple

This video presents the Erechtheion (Greek: Ἐρέχθειον), an ancient Greek temple on the north side of the Acropolis of Athens, in 3D stereoscopic type (you need red-cyan glasses).
Part of a documentary about Ancient Greek Sites.
A video in 3D stereoscopic type (you need red-cyan glasses).
Research and Writing in the Greek language Eleftherios Katsaros
English translation Natalie Margarites, and voice over in English Gus Georgilas.
A movie by EleftheriosK.
~-~~-~~~-~~-~
Please watch: "Greece 3D documentary" playlist:
• Greece 3D documentary
~-~~-~~~-~~-~

[@Happy_HIbiscus]

dude, this is cool

[@arlenecastillo4716]

thanks

[@zoilaugarte9096]

The terrain surface without the building is a topographical survey or just a drawing?. What do you think about the Penrose's model as possible solution to Erechtheion inner distribution?

[@EleftheriosKatsaros]

Hello from Athens, thanks to watch my video and comment as well. First of all, I want to clarify that I'm a video maker, not a specialist about the facts of the buildings, nether an archaeologist. So I'm not sure about these facts. I just took the archaeologist's basic thoughts and belives and I make a documentary. Just that. I really know nothing about Penrose's model (or any other), and of course that don;t mean that is false, it is only a possibility. The ancients did't touched the topography of the rock we call "Acropolis" because they believed that the rock was a spirit itself! So, they placed their constructions on the rock without hurting the rock at all! (Sorry for my poor English, hope to be understandable).

[@zoilaugarte9096]

Hola. My name is José from Perú (South America). Sorry for the wrong name, but I don't know how to change the account in these phones.
Respect the terrain images, they are a good reference to model topographic contour lines in absence of numerical data in the web.
About the Penrose's model (1888), actually is little known. I have compared the models from Tetaz (1848) to Lesk (2005) and I'm still thinking that is the more reasonable arquitectonic solution to Pausanias' description.
It's a speculation? Yes, but Elderkin told "the evidence of the building is insufficient", and I add "to be able to rebuilt it".
I'm not a specialist either, but yes a fan of this building.
If you want to contact me, please use this e-mail: [e-mail]
And thanks for your video!

[@k_k6464]

3:44