Compatible Color: The Ultimate Three-For-One Special
Vložit
- čas přidán 14. 12. 2017
- You can support this channel on Patreon! Link below
RCA's attempt at creating a new color television standard that would be compatible with existing black and white TVs initially faced technical challenges. However, it was an obviously great idea from a backward compatibility standpoint, and the National Television Systems Committee latched onto this idea and helped to propel RCA's idea to the real world. This is that story.
This channel is made possible through supporters on Patreon. These supporters have allowed me to go part time from my day job and keep these videos coming more frequently. If you're interested in helping out, please check out my Patreon page. Thanks for your consideration!
/ technologyconnections
Research for this video revealed many great resources. I've linked many down below for those interested.
www.earlytelevision.org/
This website has a tremendous amount of information, pictures, and resources available on the history of color TV. They're definitely worth checking out, and apparently you can visit the museum if you're in their area. From this website, this story about the early color systems is great:
www.earlytelevision.org/color_...
This link also includes fantastic information on the CBS color wheel system:
www.earlytelevision.org/cbs_co...
Information on NTSC encoding was supplemented from this overview on color details:
nemesis.lonestar.org/reference...
Basics for many encoding techniques were gathered from everyone's favorite reliable source of knowledge. Some good reads:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadrat...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTSC
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colorburst
Thank you to all of my current Patrons!
Tommi Hares, Alex Smith, Dakota Williams, Eitan Tal, Quinton Wilson, Jeremy DeGuzman, Sean Spark, Lucas Hartbarger, Taylor Cuzela, twiglet, David Lastres, Granger Meador, Jeremy Kitchen, Jason Wellband, Shane Belaire, Paul Emmerich, Sam Hodge, Matthew Rossi, Paul Craigie, Paul Williams, Lukas Komischke, Dave Anderson, Felix Freiberger, Dane Peterson, Brent LaRowe, Aerospyke, Kieran Cox, Hunter Schwisow, wsh, Logan Kriete, Rafał Wiosna, Adam D. Ruppe, Audin Malmin, Eric Hansen, Noah McCann, Jason R Scheuren, Rufo Sanchez, Aaron Herbst, Bjørn Vegar Torseth, Yaniv, Teague Chrystie, Matt Falcon, Kevin Landrigan, Evan Papp, Jason Weathered, KrzysFR, Sage, Ma rie, Jolyan g shaba, Stephen Youndt, Stephen Bell, Steven First, Howard Longden, Gianluca D'Orazio, Martin Granestrand, Martin Hansen, Nicolas de Cosson, PaulKT, Mahner, Edwin Öster, Nathan Weetman, Bruce Williams, Matt Harrison, James Ryan, Steven Crowson, Anthonio Pettit, Paul Ziegler, Stephen Furness, Joseph, Marty Connor, Wesley Van Pelt, Lorenzo Novara, Lee Lemoine, John Trevick, Elliot King, Paul Anderson, Gustaf Lindblad, Carl Yazbek, Nicholas, Matthew, Daniel Mann, Harald E. Westlie, Daniel Newton, urbanhusky, Henri Hyyryläinen, James Holmes, Neil Hopwood, Duncan Middleton, Conor Killeen, Tyler Knott, Slone Fallion, seagull, Athanasios Kountouras, Sarah Symon, Francis Fisher, Tab Patterson, Philipp Thomasberger, Gustavo Carballeira, SkydiveWeee, Tyler, Nolan Johnson, Samuel Kadolph, Robert Toth, Matthew Giraitis, Ellis M. Eisen, Lorenzo Stanco, Michael Shick, Thomas Jew, Eric Wood, Joe Bond, Eidorian, Nikolaj Sørensen, Jesper Hansen, John Kesson, cpb, Anonymous49856739245764, Jason Ganiatsas, U.H., Gabriel Frâncu, Nathan Casteel, Steven Willis, Marinus Swanepoel, Kedar Deshpande, Neema Mostafavi, Gerald Monaco, Piotr Mardziel, Randall Gaz, Dennis Mossler, Steven Hidy, Boris, h.drew foy, Bill Basch
If I’ve missed you, please shoot me a message! You all deserve credit, and Patreon isn’t great at just giving you lists... - Věda a technologie
Then RCA decided that vinyl was a good format for movies too and wasted about 17 years on that, ultimately bankrupting the company.
Ah yes, the Capacitance Electronic Disc. I have a CED player; it's a very interesting concept but so so _sooooo_ obviously flawed that it's amazing they just kept pursuing it. Oh well. That will probably become a video some day.
Technology Connections Yes please do a video on that, had no idea of this.
There are already several great CZcams videos on CED players. I think TechMoan did a very funny one.
Doesn't mean he can't expand upon it.
I think the big reason for Capacitance Electronic Disc's failure was that it come to the market too late I think it would have worked commercially if it came out earlier so it would have a chance in the video rental firms but I think VHS & betamax which although the recorders/players were more expensive it biggest selling point was you could record TV. Then any advantage it may have had with picture quality over them was lost when Laserdisc and CD (as it was predictable this would reduced the cost to mass produce the discs which were virtually the same just smaller compared to vinyl and Capacitance Disc) eventually was released first.
No music, no intro, a true champ. Doesn't need any hype to be excellent :)
Korpsaw yes! There are far too many long, stupid " hey fucker look at me! " Intros on CZcams
You sir, get a like. :)
YEAH!!!!!
Exactly!
Totally agree. I find music on videos like these to be distracting and totally unnecessary. Thanks!
5:05 ... "That's Y" ... possibly the most complicated build-up to a pun ever.
ikr xd
Or "Hertz to think about it"
...and that's why we love him :)))
"That's the sort of amazing life-changing things you can only learn here, at Technology Connections!" - Alec
NTSC - Color
PAL - Colour
SECAM - Couleur ;)
(Although it should really be "PAL - Farbe," since the system was invented in Germany.)
NTSC = Never The Same Color
vk3hau PAL - Good Colour
Yeah right
@@JulianAlpsNews SECAM = System Essentially Contrary to the American
Don't forget the system used by your Cold War rival: SECAM.
Interesting fact about SECAM and PAL: The brightness parts are mutually-decodable, but the colour is not. In divided Berlin, the West used PAL and the East used SECAM and both sides would tune into each other's transmissions in black and white and their own in colour.
SECAM is pure nostalgia
@@sebastiangorka200 Or perhaps _Ostalgie,_ for the Germans.
Usually we had two-system-decoders decoding SECAM and PAL for a long time. Not in the very beginning. But soon after ...
The Atari 2600 game console had a reasonable PAL variant, but the SECAM version of it had a half-assed implementation of color encoding that gave most games silly and garish color combinations (the color was just determined directly by the luminance value!) I've always figured that was why competing consoles like the Odyssey^2 (or Philips Videopac, I guess) that presumably went to the effort to do this properly were much more successful in France.
NTSC = Never Twice the Same Color
SECAM = Something Essentially Contrary to the American Method
PAL = Peace At Last
😄
6:36 Probably good to mention by this point that “I” stood for “in-phase” and “Q” for “quadrature”. That is, these were the 0° and 90° components extracted from the phase-modulated chrominance signal. If you think of this signal as a point moving in two dimensions, the direction of the point from the centre gives you the hue, and the distance from the centre is the saturation of the colour.
Excellent explanation of a complicated system!
@@ScottGrammer And the local oscillator to extract the I and Q needed to be in sync with the transmitter - hence the colour burst signal.
And there was actually a specialized kind of oscilloscope, (forgot the name of it), that displayed the quadrature relationship between these signals in exactly that way, (It was a radial display), and if you were rich enough to have one for your TV repair business, you could tune the color to a gnat's hair. Since it was expensive as oil-rights, TV shops used the much less expensive, (and correspondingly less accurate), bar/line/dot generator to align color. Most people didn't notice. Those of us who did and could see the difference, it drove batty!
@@jimharris9394 The name of the specialized oscilloscope you are trying to remember is "vectorscope". This makes sense as it is displaying the vectors that Lawrence was talking about is his excellent description of the I and Q signals. On the vectorscope screen no signal produced a dot in the centre of the screen. When given a colour signal the dot would move away from the centre. The direction it moved indicated the hue of the colour and the distance from the centre indicated the saturation of the colour. The graticule of the vectorscope had various small roughly square areas marked on it and when given a standardized colour test signal various of the illuminated blobs on the screen should fall within the marked areas (preferably in the centre of the marked area) if all of the devices in the chain of colour processing equipment were adjusted correctly.
YIQ obviously stands for 'you is questioning'
"I'm sorry, this was only supposed to be two parts."
No need to apologize for giving us yet more fantastic content. :)
Hear, hear!
Make some Gmod content Tinkerer
@The Mad Thinkerer *says that* - *watches the CED saga* - *takes that back*
6:53 Actually you’ve got it upside down; higher signal levels correspond to lower luminance levels (darker), while lower levels are higher (lighter). It was done this way so that transients caused by interference would random dark dots instead of random light dots, and the former were considered to be less noticeable.
Damn, that's hella clever
I believe that the inversion is a property of the picture tube itself, what you mentioned was just a side effect of this.
@@TheXGamer969 No, in analog TV, higher modulation creates a darker picture until it gets to about 72% at which point the picture is totally dark- this is called "blanking" level. Modulation beyond this point is for the sync pulses. But none of this applies to our current digital TV system which is entirely different.
@@nakayle A totally black picture would overheat the final amplifier tube on the transmitter, especially UHF transmitters. The transmitter would convert a solid black picture to gray after a certain time period to prevent damage.
Actually, if you use negative modulation, it is easier get the voltages going to the video input at the right level, rectify the RF signal TV transmission after filtering out the audio carrier and pass it through a low pass filter followed by a slow automatic gain control, this way the most negative edges of the synchronization pulses are at a known level and it can have a slightly more positive threshold on the resulting signal which is the correct way up, once the new data point is more positive than that threshold while the previous point is lower than that threshold, an electronic timing circuit looks for the back porch signal where the color burst is after filtering out the color burst, and the gain is further adjusted until that time slot of the signal is at the regular NTSC CVBS voltage level. At the same time, the color burst that was filtered out gets its peak-to-peak amplitude measured which is used to set the color gain. If the TV signal was transmitted the right way up, it would be much harder to get the levels correct as it would be dependent on the brightness content of the transmitted TV image.
I'm so old I remember the bad old days of early NTSC. When I was a kid, we had an older NTSC TV that was always causing problems. The "vertical hold" would constantly unlock and cause the picture to scroll continuously. If you couldn't fix it by adjusting the vertical hold knob, then sometimes banging on the side of the TV would work. The color was usually bad, so you had to constantly adjust the tint knob. When things got really bad, you'd open up the back of the TV, unplug all the tubes, and then take them down to the drugstore where they had a tube testing machine with a bunch of sockets on top. You'd take your tubes one at a time, plug it into the right socket, and a meter would tell you if the tube was still good or not. You'd buy replacements for the bad tubes, then take everything back home, plug them back in, and hope it worked better.
I think my parents got a solid-state TV pretty early on, but I remember drug stores all having those tube testers, with the big cartoon picture of a TV with a miserable face and a thermometer stuck in its mouth captioned "TV SICK?"
And the old sitcom joke:
"Did the repairman look at the TV?"
"Yes, he said it was just a tube."
"Oh, what a relief."
"The picture tube!!" WHOMP WHOMP WAH WAAHHHH
6GV8 was the usual culprit. 😆
But honestly, I can remember that being the cause of frame collapse and vertical hold problems in multiple B&W TVs and I doubt that changed a lot with color TVs.
I was four in 1964 when we had an old Admiral black and white TV and our neighbor got a color TV. I remember watching Popeye cartoons on their TV and really appreciating the color, and then watching on our black and white at home and still IMAGINING what all the colors were from what I had seen next door. Good videos! Definitely, yours is one of the two or three best channels on the -tube!
Wonderful experiencie. I was 11 in 1978 when color tv came to my country, American NTSC.
Greetings from 🇨🇱
Ha! It hertz to talk about it.
i read that exactly when he said it!
Now that Mega-Hurts!
C64 C64 LOL
Thought _exactly_ that
He does his own subtitling, instead of relying on CZcams auto-subtitles! I really appreciate that.
Interesting to think of a color TV set as an analog computer. Those boys were brilliant in those days. Did so much with so little! The car automatic transmission was also an analog computer. Great stuff!
He addressed this lightly in a later video, but for those curious about QAM, there’s one crucial aspect that was left out. The signal has to kinda squiggle around in order to get a phase offset from the colorburst. The squiggling around of the very top of the signal will be enough for a color television to determine the phase offset but not enough that it’ll bother a black and white television. Furthermore, it’ll apply a sin function and a cosine function to that phase offset in order to determine I and Q respectively. The sin function is called “in phase” and the cos function is called “in quadrature” as a cosine wave is 90° out of phase with a sine wave. That’s how modern QAM works to this day. If I got anything wrong, feel free to correct me. This is just my best interpretation from reading websites and watching videos on QAM
Some people were just born to teach. I've learned a LOT from this guy
The stuff that was done with analog signals is nothing short of amazing.
In many color sets, the final dematrixing was done in the picture tube itself. The luminance signal would be sent to the cathodes, and the color difference signals to the grids (or, the other way around) and the CRT would do the final multiplication as well as displaying the result. The cleverness displayed in those color sets was amazing.
11:22 THOSE BEZELS!
Hey, I'm sorry about the audio on this one--there are some annoying mic issues here and there. I experimented with a new method of securing the mic cord which really backfired. Oops.
Technology Connections Those bezels indeed! I’m watching this on an iPhone X and can no longer complain about its comparably minuscule ones. It’s also pretty remarkable that we can learn about an old TV, while viewing it on an OLED screen capable of HDR. We’ve come a long way since shadow masks and QAM!
Excellent video by the way! The diagram showing how the color burst worked was very helpful, I was originally unsure why the TV couldn’t *just* use its own oscillator, but with the help of the diagram I realized that could be out of phase with the one used to encode the data.
T H I C C
Technology Connections
And I'll write it here as well, just in case.
If you're going to get into PAL, please please do Teletext.
It was an absolute phenomenon, digital interactive television in the 1970s!
We had chatrooms, magazines, games, automatic VCR programming!
We could even download software off of it for our home computers!!
I'm on a 4 yr old OLED with higher pixel density and better colors. Too bad Samsung decided it was too expensive with not enough return value. Great that the iPhone went OLED, mad that Samsung can but won't make a better screen for it.
Another fantastic presentation, it is mind bending how they achieved all that back then with such tight restraints on bandwidth ETC, I laughed and threw up the first time I was subjected to (No Two the Same Colour), TVs with purple skies and orange people, but seeing that it was designed to operated on valve technology by people using slide rules is simply amazing. I was also unaware that NTSC was an abbreviation for the governing body, live and learn, again, thank you for the cliffhanger series.
If you're going to be doing PAL, please eventually get round to doing Teletext.
It was a phenomenon here, digital interactive television in the 1970s!
not really interactive, purely receptive: the tv had to wait until the specific page you requested was broadcast, and then it loads into the display buffer of the decoder chip. of course, plenty of interactive-seeming things could be established by setting different choices to different pages.
you couldn't send any data back directly on the service - though bt ran a service with very similar graphical specs over the phone lines, which did allow interactivity, with their hardware.
+Kit Vitae
I would say it's interactive in the sense you could display the page you wanted when you wanted, so although it was repeatedly broadcast, the user experience was one of choosing your own content as desired. Not greatly interactive by modern standards, but a big step towards the idea of on-demand digital information at the time. It took us a decent step beyond just changing channel as our only way of interacting with the TV.
Ooooh, Teletext. That was an awesome thing to fiddle around with as a kid.
Out of all channels we had, it was only the boring news one that actually broadcasted teletext stuff. I remember going around those digital colorful pages.
There was one that would update continuously, that simply displayed white text on black background below, being an effective way of showing subtitles. Another one was on a teletext channel 888 that was just all kinds of tests and stuff, with rainbows, and flashing text, and every letter... It was hypnotizing just looking at that, while news woman in the background was reporting whatever happened... ._.
@@Architector_4 In Czech Republic, the only station that supported Teletext CC in the beginning of PAL standard was national television company CT (Czech Television), with commercial stations latching later on. Teletext is still used today in Czech Republic, though its interpretation is now better handled with digital signal replacing an old analogue TV we are kind of still used to. If you want to display CC, there are now two ways of doing that: eighter using Teletext, or it is transmitted as subtitles provided by the station for the program. I've never actually tried the Teletext CC, not even the subtitles.
However, with new standard of digital broadast, there's now possibility to broadcast more than one sound carrier, allowing us to change languages of the spoken word (mainly Czech and English when it comes to our country). With subtitles being able to be turned on, it's perfect for watching movies in original language with Czech subtitles on. Only if all stations actually used that feature. Now only Czech Television actually uses this feature in foreign programs (except for Slovak programs 'cause there's no need to provide translations), I wish that commercial stations actually grabbed this opportunity to provide audience the ability to choose the language, without the need to enforce it by legislative means.
It’s so cool that you guys had that. I wonder why we never did in the US
Regarding the Y, I, and Q ratios: I instantly recognize the "Y" ratios as the relative sensitivity of the rod cells in the human retina to different colors of light, which determines how we expect greyscale images to look. From what I can tell, the "I" value determines the skewing of the color towards orange or cyan, which allows for Y+I to form a 2-color TV signal. The "Q" value further skews the "I" signal to allow for magenta and lime-green colors, and by combining magenta (red + blue) , orange (2 parts red + 1 part green), lime-green (1 part red + 2 parts green), and cyan (green + blue), you can get the full spectrum that humans can see. Yes, green is heavily referenced, but that's because human eyes are primarily sensitive to green light, with red and blue only providing color, not providing the majority of image detail.
And that's what it points to on a Vectorscope.
Good book to read about color (colour) is "Full Spectrum" by Adam Rogers
This is the best concise explanation of color TV that I've come across to date. Attempting to explain QAM is a tall order and you nailed it! By the end of high school I understood how black & white TV worked. Then in college I worked at a TV master control production center with racks of tape machines, TBCs, waveform monitors and vectorscopes, and it took me until the end of college to finally understand how color TV worked! It all comes down to math, algebra, physics, the manipulation of electrons. The more you study it, the more you realize how scientifically beautiful it is ....if you don't hurt your head trying! It's like a dream that it works!
"It Hertz to think about it..." :) I see what you did there.
My family got our first color set around 1968 or 69. My Mom bought it and had it put in without telling anyone. I came home from school one day, walked by the usual TV viewing area, and was completely speechless at the sight of a color TV.
I got my first personal TV as a Christmas present at age 13-ish, a 13-inch diagonal black and white set. I didn't own a color set myself until I was 21 or 22 - it was my college graduation present.
These videos have the highest density of digestible, interesting information anywhere on youtube.
Excellent video! As you mentioned, the practice of broadcasting shows in color predates most people actually owning a color TV by at least a decade. Well, the same is true for production studios: The earliest color TV broadcasts, if they were recorded at all, were recorded using B&W kinescopes, so no color copies survived. However, the extra info a color TV signal contains introduces a visible pattern of interference on old B&W TV equipment, including those kinescopes. Today, this regular interference pattern can be analyzed by software and used to reconstruct the original color recording. I know a few early Dr Who episodes have had their original color restored using this technique.
That's what the "chroma dots" he talks about at the end are.
@11:33 The reason the complexity of the consumer televisions escalated in the late 40s was due to all of the developments during WWII. This dumped thousands of well trained electronics technicians into the 1945+ job market as well accelerated electronics R&D thanks to those new fangled computing machines and other fundamental breakthroughs.
The complexity was simply because it is complicated to decode an NTSC color signal reliably and they hadn't discovered the shortcuts yet. They weren't making them complicated for fun.
Also, what were these "new fangled computing machines" in the early 1950s? We were still using mechanical adding machines well into the 1960 and electronic calculators weren't common until the early 1970's.
As an engineer, my first order designs are based on the overall block diagram of the system. It usually contains a lot of redundancy. But, it allows each section to be studied in detail before another engineering pass goes after simplification and cost reduction. The NTSC color coding is traceable to the studies of human vision which was very precise but not very efficient from a manufacturers point of view.
RCA had multiple analog computers doing mundane tasks that were monstrous tasks before. Like tuning antenna arrays. SEE: Antenalyzer in George H. Brown's famous book, “and part of which I was - Recollections of a Research Engineer”. These were still electric slide rules. But, they were greatly increasing productivity. I believe that engineers at RCA and Hazeltine both used analog computers to model various circuits that ended up in NTSC. Yes, correct. Most of the complexity was placed on the broadcaster end of the service to make TVs "simpler". The same was done with the arrival of HDTV.
Take a look at the schematic of an RCA CT-100. It's 36 tubes but I see no redundancy or needless complexity. Decoding NTSC was difficult back then, especially when you have to make separate filters for the I and Q signals since they have different bandwidths.
videolabguy, I studied electronics back in college. There, I remember being introduced to the "integrator" and "differentiator" circuits, which were simply a series RC-circuit powered by a pulse-waveform. If the output with respect to ground was taken across the capacitor, you had an integrator. If the components were reversed, and it was taken across the resistor instead, you had a differentiator. They were both a type of analogue computer. Imagine that: such simple circuits being able to perform calculus! :)
Look at 60's TVs. They decoded the same NTSC, but the complexity is reduced. Sometimes it's reduced too much (to cutting cost as always), so the color fidelity was in fact worst then on CT100 (no correct DC restoring, subtracting Y and chroma directly on CRT, no IQ delay line...).
fun fact: the field-sequential color system did find use in the later moon landings, although it ran at the standard 525/29.97 rate and was converted from field-sequential to standard NTSC once received on Earth.
I’m a huge fan of this channel, you find the right balance of piquing my interest in the technology and helping break down how the technology works on a deeper level than most dare to do. Thanks for making us viewers feel not patronized and really trying to explain difficult concepts in entertaining yet informative videos! I can’t wait for part 3.
This is quickly becoming one of my favorite channels on CZcams. So much interesting information on the history of various bits of technology!
It helped me to understand all the colourspace stuff to visualise it, seeing the RGB and YIQ cubes and how they related to each other really helped me more than the maths.
Oh wow, thank you :) For the past 20 years I've always thought that the colour burst contained the colour information, that awkwardly the TV set would have to remember for the rest of the scan line to apply later on. You managed to explain that it isn't, and how it actually works, in a way I've never really seen anywhere else before. Big thumbs up.
I just recently stumbled upon your channel. I must say, it's very informative and yet not boring. Keep up the good work, you definitely deserve some more viewers. Greetings from Germany.
Finally a clear explanation of how it works. I have been looking for a such understanding for a while, thanks! So in short, the luminance signal is no longer AM modulated but instead it's amplitude+phase modulated; which appears as normal AM when decoded by old B/W TV sets. And the short color burst during the back porch is used to create a clock reference for the incoming line. Cool trick.
Thank you for these videos! They're really fascinating, and I feel like I learn a lot about older technology I didn't. I especially liked your christmas lights video. And it's a little silly, but my cat loves your videos too--he'll usually hop up so he can watch when he hears your voice.
I'm so addicted! I'm binging all of your videos! Color me educated!
Excellent explanation about NTSC Television system. I worked in colour TV systems during the 70s through to the early 2000s. The circuit design for this system is complex. I like your simple explanation. The average person would be lost to understand this in any form of detail. This system was genius.
PLEASE, I AM BEGGING YOU!!! Do more info graphics :) You have very good calm way to explaining things :) greetings from Poland :)
Your show reminds me of The Star Hustler with Jack Horkheimer...I mean that as a compliment. Really loved the way he explained things, and enjoyed his personality. Same goes for you.
Thank you for the technology classes on CZcams. Always great lessons even when sometimes it is just a refreshing course
You have my respect for the research done on this older tech.
It’s amazing to me, how much tech we are still using this day.
Thank you for these videos! You're doing a great job, and I for one don't mind you continuing this into another video ;-)
I am actually happy about having an extra part, especially for history bits. I know the technological part so hearing the crazy stories surrounding their invention is the most fascinating part to me.
The simplest way I were able to describe color TV in one of my lessons, was that every color element was described with a complex number - basically, a number with an angle. The number represented the intensity (luminance) and the angle - between the zero reference provided by the subcarrier and the transmitted value - represented the color. As matter of facts, the color was encoded as a phase difference - an angle.
It is obvious that the compatible color system was defined by a roundtable of geniuses.
Telefunken improved the NTSC by switching the phase of 180 degrees at every line, requiring a color delay line.
Thanks for the toughful video.
I'm excited you're going to talk about PAL. So thanks for making another video on this topic!
Great video! You did a good job explaining what is otherwise a ridiculously complicated to explain broadcast system. I don't mind the extension of the parts, all these videos are very interesting.
Could you do a series on Plasma televisions? I remember being in awe of how amazing the Pioneer Elite picture was, I must have sat for a few hours watching the promo movies at the Home Theater store over and over when they came out. Must have been...2001...2002...?
Better a few long videos then one short not as informational video.
This is really cool! I look forward to another one!
I love your videos!
Takes me back to 1990 when I was learning all about TV signals in University.
Don't be sorry mate! Your in-depth content excluding no seemingly mundane detail is what I come here for. When I have a tech-itch, I need it scratched with someone passionate explaining every minute detail to a tee. It is kind of therapeutic learning, soothing my brain back into smart after coping with all the stupid around in life lol. Keep up the awesome work! :)
Was looking forward to this one. Totally love your work.
Thank you for what you do man. It's amazing what I can learn in 13 minutes from your material, f..ng awsome job. KUDOS!
Best explanation of NTSC / compatible color I have ever seen.
Man your enunciation is so relaxing... I can bake and watch these visa all day long!
I've been listening to this in the background while I work and I have absolutely no idea what's being explained, but goddamn if I can't keep listening anyway.
Nice you are getting better and better man !!! From that regional boy with a jacket to this international man with nice backing (I like your other setup also but you are improving every day it’s nice)
Wow! We really took color tv for granted. I had no idea how complicated it was, and this really speaks to engineering back then. And they did this with pencil and paper, not computers. Absolutely amazing.
I remember wondering any this exact thing when I was little and just getting into electronics. Your videos kick ass! :)
Why was this just now reccomended to me? Love it
amazing channel. Awaiting eagerly your next one!
Just pledged on patreon to push you past your first goal! I love your content, keep it going!
Thank you kindly!
Every time my dad and I have a conversation about old TV sets, he always has to add (excitedly, as if it's still new information to him) the fact that he didn't know Star Trek was filmed in color until he watched it at his grandmother's house because she had a big ol' color TV.
Superman was photographed in color long before people had color TV sets. (The George Reeves version of the show. )
I followed up until this video, but I still flippin' love this channel!
Thanks! I'm deep into studying retro game console hardware, and the NTSC video generation bits were making my head foggy. This actually really helps understand what's going on, and now the squiggles on my scope almost make sense.
You really want to make your brain fried? Look up how the Apple IIe computer displays color...the pixels are exactly 1/4 (or 1/2) of a color subcarrier cycle apart, resulting in text with bright color fringes when the color burst is being transmitted...
"CBS's sequential color wheel system"
How many takes did it take for that to come out so smooth?
Your videos are always interesting, informative and entertaining. No mean feat to accomplish that. Thanks.
Nice job, highly informative. Plus a tip of the hat to the great work of the late Ed Reitan, who documented the history of color TV, archived over at the Early Television site.
I've been waiting for this video!
You do such great videos. I even understand what you explain, the first time!
We brought a used color television from hotel chain sale in 1977.
When plugged in and turned it on I was completely blown away. For 17 years I only saw black & white.
Really great info, as usual. I'm surprised you didn't show a screenshot of an oscilloscope, though. Watching an NTSC line (or any other analog display signal) on a scope is a real hoot.
Some day you should do a segment on computer modems. I'd love to see your take on the history of the devices, and all the complicated handshaking that goes on between the transceivers. Let's see how many whippersnappers have heard all those wonderful sounds!
Support
Second the desire to see moving footage on a scope. I've seen test patterns on them before though.
It's interesting that you mention modems, since QAM was involved in those too - bringing the throughput to above 9.6kb/s while remaining at 9600Bd.
@@kaitlyn__L I remember 100baud ...- dialup !
I started using a modem in the early 80s. 300 baud, slower than you could type, or read.
Holy cow. I do signal demodulation all the time in my line of work but never knew this. It is amazing all the stuff that has come from signal modulation and mixing. All those retired engineers and laughing at how easy things are now usign digital signal processing.
Love watching your channel. I wish you were on TV.
Just want you to know.
You make awesome content.
That would have to be the best succint presentation on this subject I have ever seen.
Great job!
:-)
Once again, a really nice video, really informative, keep 'em coming, your work is amazing :) !
Thanks for your efforts on creating truly science videos!
Nice job tackling a very complex subject! It's pretty amazing they got this stuff to work using 1950s analog technology.
"Compatible color" was a huge boon... right up to the end of the analog era, you could still buy little black and white CRT TVs.
yeah, It's a shame ATSC has rendered those impractical (the entire MPEG TS must be demodulated to get any video at all.. no opportunity any more to leave out significant circuitry), along with mobile reception in general due to its multipath sensitivity.
@@jordanhazen7761 I said this a zillion times...but I will say what Karl Marx says...capitalism destroys everything it touches.
I am very happy now the series is wrapped up for colour analogue TV
God tier play of words as always. This channel rocks!
I remember reading about color matrixing and working through the circuitry, finding the Y signal, and R-Y and B-Y and wondering where the circuitry was that combined them. It turned out the picture tube itself was doing the multiplication! The luminance signal drove the cathodes, and the color difference signals drove the grids, producing the individually modulated R, G, and B electron streams directly in the CRT.
My parents received an 19in RCA 'portable" Color TV as a wedding gift. It was definitely smaller than any other TV I had seen as a kid, and we would take it to other people's houses to watch important televised broadcasts, like the moon landing that occurred on my older brother's birthday in 1969. We had the only color TV on our block up to 1971.
Love how clever they had to be during the analog days!
These videos are fantastic!
Thank you for explaining. Very interesting.
Your videos are so freakin awesome.
Thank you for this video
This one just blew my mind
I love your channel.. keep up the awesome work :)
Cheers good buddy.Just love it.Really interesting, follow it generally but great for my 74yr old brain.Many thanks.Colin.UK (2017)
I'm old enough to have lived in a home that had only *A* black and white TV. That is, ONE TV, and it was black and white. No remote either.
After we got a color TV -- _"Movnin' on up..."_ -- I always wondered how the color signal displayed just fine on our old black and white TV. Now I know.
Incidentally, my family was one of the first to have a microwave oven. Several time we hosted people in our home to show them how it cooked potatoes, boiled water, cooked TV dinners (on a plate), defrosted meat, softened ice cream, heated leftovers, cooked popcorn in a brown paper bag, etc. Strangers would sometimes knock on our door and ask if they could see it in action; Usually with a TV dinner or potato in hand--I kid not.
* Dire Straits intensifies *
Mahalo for another great vid!!!!!
I love the shot of the old TV chassis. 11:24
@G Guest And that's only after correctly aligning all of the transformers and coils.
Self aware humor, complex ideas in layman terms. Excellent youtube channel
Awesome video, as always!
6:01 - Someone needs to learn After Effects 😂 one of my favorite things about your videos is these little messages you briefly flash onscreen. You have one of the best channels on YT, thank you and keep up the good work.
Btw, if anyone actually reads this message AE takes some real time and effort but is very much worth it, can make a career with this skill if want to
Wow!!!! You are a technical GOD! Thank you for this excellent video!!!!! THUMBS UP!!!! :)
I’m an engineering major and QAM still flies over my head. Granted I’m only a sophomore, but I’m going too need to understand this
Composite is the name for this, and is still in use today on new TVs
These videos continue to be excellent.
Wow, amazing video. I really enjoyed it.
You are one of the best explainers of historic advance engineering and technology. Strange how now days technology advances so fast that comparability is no longer relevant.