Bertrand Russell on God (1959)

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 23. 08. 2024
  • The fantastic Bertrand Russell talks about his thoughts and beliefs on god or lack there of. Regardless of your own personal beliefs you have to admire the way in which he stands by his own beliefs when under scrutiny.

Komentáře • 470

  • @donaldwhittaker7987
    @donaldwhittaker7987 Před 3 měsíci +9

    Great guy. First learned about him when I was 16 and he had just died at age 97. I felt like I knew him. He made me feel smart. In time, I became smart. And it has stuck with me ever since.

  • @orion7592
    @orion7592 Před rokem +59

    Bertrand Russell was the embodiment of an immense intelligence. He was a sincere human being who seemed to be most honest with himself. As a fellow atheist, I resonate with his intellect and ideas. His honesty enabled him to challenge Mathematics in the most provocative way by introducing his famous paradox. As atheists, we do not necessarily dismiss those who endorse religious values and beliefs. We merely ask if whether you truly and honestly accept those tenets and ideologies to be true!

    • @vaxrvaxr
      @vaxrvaxr Před rokem

      That's of course a very inconvenient question when you're trying to convince yourself of some religious belief.

    • @BertrandRussell2
      @BertrandRussell2 Před rokem

      ‘’Scientific societies are as yet in their infancy… It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give governments much more control over individual mentality than they now have even in totalitarian countries. Fitche laid it down that education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished. Diet, injections(vaccines) and injunctions will combine, from very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible...’’ - Bertrand Russell, 1953
      He wants to Bring about the New World Order and make the world into 1984. WAKE UP!
      He's a satanist which is why he doesn't want you to believe in God or Spirits.

    • @BertrandRussell2
      @BertrandRussell2 Před rokem +1

      @@vaxrvaxr ??? I know most religious beliefs are in fact true. Pieces of the larger picture. Im not a cuck.

    • @BertrandRussell2
      @BertrandRussell2 Před rokem

      @@dianemorrell9638 Just imagine for a moment that everything you've ever been taught is a lie.
      Vaccines are Safe and Effective, Flouride Microplastics are good, Monsanto Bayer Pesticides are good
      5g is good
      Climate Change is Real and you need to give us totalitarian control because of it.
      War Is Peace
      The Truth is A lie
      Ignorance is Strength
      Wake up
      You don't believe in science. Thats the dumbest thing anyones ever said.
      You do the science you follow the facts wherever they go.
      Anyone that says X can't be true aren't scientists they are brainwashed normies.
      Read My Quote From Betrand Russell.
      You wouldn't know reason and Facts if it hit you in the face.
      1984 is the Elites plan for the World As is brave New World Orwell and Huxley were killed for releasing it to the public.
      Its like animal farm things we knew to be true have been trained out of us over the generations.
      I'd read Bill Coopers Behold a Pale Horse.
      He predicted the 9/11 attacks and that the Government would blame Bin Laden and use it to start wars and sieze our rights.
      He was killed for that.

    • @Samael-Metzger
      @Samael-Metzger Před rokem

      overrated.

  • @robertyoung701
    @robertyoung701 Před měsícem +2

    A true philosopher we loss many years ago. Always will be remembered as one of the most influential and greatest.

  • @MsJavaWolf
    @MsJavaWolf Před rokem +34

    Deathbed conversions are the opposite of logic. Scared people, who are in pain, will do almost anything to alleviate it, take any medicine or drug. Bringing up deathbed conversions seems more like an argument for atheism to me.

    • @keklulu332
      @keklulu332 Před měsícem

      So alleviating pain is bad, good to know

    • @MsJavaWolf
      @MsJavaWolf Před měsícem +2

      @@keklulu332 My point is that we are not thinking rationally when we are in pain. Some people will turn to alcohol or illegal drugs and make their lives even worse, I don't blame them but we are not thinking straight in those moments.
      The same is true for beliefs that might not be rational. If you only start believing in God because you are dying it's not a belief you arrived at rationally. Who knows, maybe the same thing will even happen to me but I wouldn't see that as an argument that God actually exists.

  • @markymark8196
    @markymark8196 Před rokem +42

    One of the greatest minds of the last 100 years. I love his philosophical writings and thoughts.

    • @stelioeffrena6909
      @stelioeffrena6909 Před rokem +2

      he was a technocrat commie mistaken for a philosopher. Mathematicians speaking about morality always ends up in dull unfounded cringe

    • @CIMAmotor
      @CIMAmotor Před rokem

      @@stelioeffrena6909 Yep, agree.

    • @Rumplesti1tskin
      @Rumplesti1tskin Před rokem

      Stella, how painfully ignorant. Russell condemned Marxism and communism.

    • @blumpkinspicelatte4580
      @blumpkinspicelatte4580 Před 7 měsíci

      One of the greatest turds of the last 100 years. English accents don't indicate intelligence contrary to popular belief.

    • @wander67
      @wander67 Před měsícem

      @@Rumplesti1tskin right when it stopped being so popular. Same thing with pacifism. He constantly changed his views to ones that benefiet himself through his whole life.

  • @tgunersel
    @tgunersel Před 9 lety +177

    A true hero. I read his essays -including "Why I am not a Christian*- when I was 13 and felt the need to question my "liberal Muslim" upbringing and first I decided to become an agnostic, then, at 15, I categorized myself an atheist citizen of the world. I prefer to call myself a naturalist and the supernaturalists 'a-naturalists".

    • @tgunersel
      @tgunersel Před 8 lety +1

      Alexandria School of Science Thank you. Would you be interested in the Earth Civilization Project I initiated 3 years ago ? :)

    • @solidus1995
      @solidus1995 Před 8 lety +6

      Yes I prefer the term naturalist over atheist as well. But ironically I like atheism because it's most known, despite many believers having misconceptions about it.

    • @JeffRebornNow
      @JeffRebornNow Před 6 lety +1

      Bertrand Russell was an agnostic, not an atheist. I should add, also, Lord Sathanus, that whereof you cannot speak, you should remain silent.

    • @TheTariqibnziyad
      @TheTariqibnziyad Před 5 lety +3

      congrats i left islam at 21, then again its harder when you live in an islamic shithole

    • @harounrashad1052
      @harounrashad1052 Před 5 lety

      @@TheTariqibnziyad Which country do you live in?

  • @metalbirdie
    @metalbirdie Před 11 lety +31

    I can't get enough of this guy face after answering each question, I'd pay a lot of money to know what was going on in his head during the intervals lol

    • @like_the_comment
      @like_the_comment Před 11 měsíci

      Are you still alive bro🤔🤔

    • @Ojcovito-ck5le
      @Ojcovito-ck5le Před 3 měsíci +1

      I suppose there is ride of valkyries being played in his head

  • @MMaximuSS1975
    @MMaximuSS1975 Před 10 lety +78

    Beautifully said.

  • @sashajasper497
    @sashajasper497 Před 2 měsíci +2

    The simple answer is to always be a freethinker and be open to all possibilities. Now thats pure freedom.

  • @dimitrioskalfakis
    @dimitrioskalfakis Před rokem +15

    brilliant man with valuable lessons to teach all of us.

    • @BertrandRussell2
      @BertrandRussell2 Před rokem

      ‘’Scientific societies are as yet in their infancy… It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give governments much more control over individual mentality than they now have even in totalitarian countries. Fitche laid it down that education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished. Diet, injections(vaccines) and injunctions will combine, from very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible...’’ - Bertrand Russell, 1953
      He wants to Bring about the New World Order and make the world into 1984. WAKE UP!
      He's a satanist which is why he doesn't want you to believe in God or Spirits.

    • @marcusaurelius9123
      @marcusaurelius9123 Před 6 měsíci +1

      ​@BertrandRussell2 you need help. Look into your hateful soul ..this gentleman is all that is good. You resent him because he calls out your fallacious beliefs. Reflect & repent. Seek the truth not ancient myths.

  • @bliots8369
    @bliots8369 Před rokem +6

    I watch this video and all I can think about is Ecclesiastes when Solomon writes about the meaningless of life apart from God, "I said to myself, 'Look, I have increased in wisdom more than anyone who has ruled over Jerusalem before me; I have experienced much of wisdom and knowledge.' Then I applied myself to the understanding of wisdom, and also of madness and folly, but I learned that this, too, is a chasing after the wind.
    For with much wisdom comes much sorrow;
    the more knowledge, the more grief."
    What's the point of devoting your whole life to growing your intellect as much as possible? Apart from the fact that you will never know everything because 1. the human mind is limited and 2. there will never be enough resources or evidence to learn everything, in the end, you're gonna die and leave everything you've worked for behind you. It's just sad. I guess if I had that rigid mindset I would try to make the best of the time I had. I just don't get it. What's the point? He says he sees no evidence for God. How? If there was a God, look where you could see His fingerprints. The trees, the ocean, the order and cycle of the earth, the sun, the moon, the stars, the universe, our minds, our consciousness, morality, justice, virtue, love. There's so much more to life than "the facts". God made our minds for more than that. That idea of strictly living by what you know to be true because it has been tested and experimented and studied just seems sad and flawed to me. Your life will always be limited. Not because what you know to be true is holding you back from what you want to believe, but because you refuse to believe anything which hasn't been tested and validated by science. "I think, therefore I am." Okay. What's the point of being if all you do is think? I don't know, I'm just spitballin' here

    • @nwoksh
      @nwoksh Před 28 dny

      You are limited in your intellect. You talk about - leaving everything behind - behind as if you are sure of a destination. Why do you eat delicious stuff, have sex or pleasurable past times when you will leave everything behind. By the way, king Solomon did not know math or science and most probably thought God lived in the clouds - hos famed wisdom was ordinary, at best.

  • @chillie0000
    @chillie0000 Před měsícem +3

    Everyone in the whole world no matter what religion you think is the truth should be forced to hear this man speak maybe we would have less problems in the world and more sanity more love and less divisions❤
    Pls stop believing in fairy tales and make the most of life right now

  • @Electronite1978
    @Electronite1978 Před 11 lety +50

    Such an irony that so many simple minded representatives of our specie come to mock one of the most brilliant minds in history. It is like throwing pearls to the pigs. What would pigs know of the real value of this mans thoughs.

    • @seanb6626
      @seanb6626 Před 2 lety +1

      i couldn't agree more

    • @bluetc1474
      @bluetc1474 Před 2 lety

      💯

    • @alexandriabaroque937
      @alexandriabaroque937 Před rokem

      The word is "species." There is no such word as "specie."

    • @Umbriel92
      @Umbriel92 Před rokem +3

      ​@@alexandriabaroque937 Come on man he typoed it it's no deal

    • @LeTrashPanda
      @LeTrashPanda Před 25 dny

      Thinking people terrify them. When they start thinking, they abandon ship that's what they fear. How many Atheists come from organized religion? I'd say many by own interactions with people.

  • @Ben-vf8jv
    @Ben-vf8jv Před 8 lety +43

    This is one of the most concise arguments against christianity I have ever heard.

    • @CHRISDABAHIA
      @CHRISDABAHIA Před 6 lety +1

      Ben No kidding....

    • @ishmaelforester9825
      @ishmaelforester9825 Před 6 lety +17

      Nonsense. It doesn't touch Christianity on a single point. The idea the followers of the Lord think it is merely expedient is nonsense. No, the Lord incarnated and confirmed selfishness as the supreme evil when He united man to the God on the cross. Expedience or mere feeling has nothing to do with it.

    • @FMB_Bmg
      @FMB_Bmg Před 4 lety +11

      @@ishmaelforester9825 selfishness is actually the cause for morality. Without selfishness, there would be absolutely no point in having a morality whatsoever.

    • @ishmaelforester9825
      @ishmaelforester9825 Před 4 lety +2

      Prisons are built with stones of law, brothels with bricks of religion - Blake

    • @HughJaxident67
      @HughJaxident67 Před 3 lety +4

      @@ishmaelforester9825
      *Prisons are built with stones of law, brothels with bricks of religion*
      It seems to me the concept that an all knowing and all powerful god cares so much about what people do between the sheets is an utter nonsense and only deserving of ridicule.

  • @user-ky5dy5hl4d
    @user-ky5dy5hl4d Před 3 měsíci +1

    ''Mathematics may be defined as the subject in which we never know what we are talking about, nor whether what we are saying is true.''
    Bertrand Russell

  • @bpresleyc
    @bpresleyc Před 11 lety +4

    This lady interviewing him is guiding the questions and imposing some a perspective on the questions that appeals to his views...done watching this.

  • @giulioluzzardi7632
    @giulioluzzardi7632 Před měsícem +1

    Take a good look and listen, that is what a true Hero looks like. No fear .

  • @314westender159
    @314westender159 Před rokem +7

    Wonderful moments with one of the 20th century's greatest minds. Just imagine how much greater it could have been if the interviewer was up to the task.

    • @BertrandRussell2
      @BertrandRussell2 Před rokem

      ‘’Scientific societies are as yet in their infancy… It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give governments much more control over individual mentality than they now have even in totalitarian countries. Fitche laid it down that education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished. Diet, injections(vaccines) and injunctions will combine, from very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible...’’ - Bertrand Russell, 1953
      He wants to Bring about the New World Order and make the world into 1984. WAKE UP!
      He's a satanist which is why he doesn't want you to believe in God or Spirits.

  • @johreh
    @johreh Před 2 lety +14

    There is an immense intelligence and curiousity behind those eyes.

  • @rekdinhopoetico
    @rekdinhopoetico Před 10 lety +16

    Russell é o meu maior herói na filosofia e ele tem razão em dizer que não há uma razão prática para acreditar no que é falso. Por outro lado, não é possível provar que "não existe uma vida transcendente", seja no sentido cristão, platônico, espírita, panteísta, ou seja lá qual for. Eu não acredito em "after life", entretanto, não posso provar a veracidade ou falsidade de "existe vida após a morte". Nesse ponto, o Russell se contradiz na sua "busca pela verdade". Ora, na ausência de provas, suspende-se o juízo! Eis o cerne do agnosticismo! Não é mais uma questão de "acredito/desacredito". É óbvio que a religião se apoia nessa impossibilidade de prova, assim como o "mau gosto musical" se apoia no "gosto não se discute". Enfim, gosto demais do B.R., principalmente do seu "Análise da Matéria".

  • @archie977
    @archie977 Před 11 lety +7

    thanks for posting

  • @richardkemp5550
    @richardkemp5550 Před rokem +4

    I'm sure that Paul Whitehouse could do a marvellous Bertrand Russell

  • @HuntingHorn
    @HuntingHorn Před 4 lety +9

    where can i find the full interview?

  • @VincenzoPellerito-fw8oz
    @VincenzoPellerito-fw8oz Před měsícem +2

    So he does not believe in a Sovereign Creator. But he believes in absolutes of Truth? Where did this absolute truth come from? Who defines it?

  • @RobertoCha
    @RobertoCha Před 11 lety +3

    Brilliant comment about a wonderful human being...

  • @dickyboyryw
    @dickyboyryw Před rokem +2

    Please post more of this interview or say where we can see it? Footage and audio of Bertrand is so limited but usefull*

  • @Lemon_Inspector
    @Lemon_Inspector Před 2 lety +7

    "Don't you think most humans are weak and stupid and should have principles forced upon them?"
    The interviewer really missed her calling.

    • @dongjuang4196
      @dongjuang4196 Před rokem +1

      You can't force anyone to become strong and clever.

    • @orion7592
      @orion7592 Před rokem

      Well said - you noticed it!

    • @vaxrvaxr
      @vaxrvaxr Před rokem +1

      Honestly that's what almost everyone thinks. I can be trusted to decide what's right and wrong, but everyone else should be forced by law.

    • @BertrandRussell2
      @BertrandRussell2 Před rokem +1

      ‘’Scientific societies are as yet in their infancy… It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give governments much more control over individual mentality than they now have even in totalitarian countries. Fitche laid it down that education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished. Diet, injections(vaccines) and injunctions will combine, from very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible...’’ - Bertrand Russell, 1953
      He wants to Bring about the New World Order and make the world into 1984. WAKE UP!
      He's a satanist which is why he doesn't want you to believe in God or the spiritual.

    • @BertrandRussell2
      @BertrandRussell2 Před rokem

      @@dongjuang4196 ‘’Scientific societies are as yet in their infancy… It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give governments much more control over individual mentality than they now have even in totalitarian countries. Fitche laid it down that education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished. Diet, injections(vaccines) and injunctions will combine, from very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible...’’ - Bertrand Russell, 1953
      He wants to Bring about the New World Order and make the world into 1984. WAKE UP!
      He's a satanist which is why he doesn't want you to believe in God or Spirits.

  • @mf-h3659
    @mf-h3659 Před 6 lety +10

    what a lad

  • @brinderpalkang7827
    @brinderpalkang7827 Před 4 lety +25

    Philosophers are roots of mankind,,

    • @nsjx
      @nsjx Před 2 lety

      intriguing statement. you may be onto something, and whether that is a good thing in the grand scheme is also an intriguing discussion

    • @BertrandRussell2
      @BertrandRussell2 Před rokem

      ‘’Scientific societies are as yet in their infancy… It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give governments much more control over individual mentality than they now have even in totalitarian countries. Fitche laid it down that education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished. Diet, injections(vaccines) and injunctions will combine, from very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible...’’ - Bertrand Russell, 1953
      He wants to Bring about the New World Order and make the world into 1984. WAKE UP!
      He's a satanist which is why he doesn't want you to believe in God or the spiritual.

    • @bigmacdaddy1234
      @bigmacdaddy1234 Před rokem

      And those roots can be good and bad. There were some bad philosophers.

  • @englishwithmuzammal3596
    @englishwithmuzammal3596 Před 3 lety +8

    This is the man who lived before us, having the views utterly against the existing dogma of religion and seems to be satisfied, which shows intelligence is not about having knowledge by reading the books replete with views, science, philosophy as the truth matters and nothing can stand against it; that said, what, I guess, he could not fathom is something that our intellect is unable to comprehend, and there are many examples in which it has been demonstrated; for example, our inner voice is the proof that evidence cannot physically prove it, but we know that it does exist. The dream is another miracle. Though science explains mechanics but not, why question...

  • @jamestownf
    @jamestownf Před 4 měsíci +2

    He seems to have thought himself very smart indeed!

  • @Turjak_art
    @Turjak_art Před rokem +3

    It would be interesting to know what was his last thought before death. Maybe he changed his mind?

  • @strafrag1
    @strafrag1 Před 11 měsíci +2

    Brilliant man.

  • @gamelightsyt9197
    @gamelightsyt9197 Před 7 měsíci +1

    If something is not visible does not mean it is not true,
    It is one of the basic fallacies, you can never observe an electron or even an atom ,does not mean they do not exist! And even then philosophically , arguments have evolved and one of the finest arguments are in brief as :
    Contingency argument: Every dependent thing has resource.
    this resource dependency will inevitably come to an end where there has to be a independent resource , on which every other dependent resource depends on.
    Fine tuning argument : it describes the probability of the creation of this creation with all odds against it having more probability as close to 99.1 percent but still we came to existence.
    Non-dual infinity argument etc!

    • @BalugaWhale37
      @BalugaWhale37 Před 3 měsíci

      Russel does not argue as you suggest. To go beyond the perceptual, man had to use concepts. These concepts must be formed using evidence of the senses and logic. You can know about the existence of the invisible such as electron through observing their effects at the visible scale and then using induction and logic to generalize. Russel, as a teenager, found the evidence for God and Christian dogma to be without evidence or without proper logical transformation. Better than Russel, I recommend Ayn Rand's theory of concept formation for a fuller explanation of how we come to understand the world.

  • @cjhoare
    @cjhoare Před rokem +1

    Marvellous.

  • @georgeraviable
    @georgeraviable Před 5 lety +6

    watching in 2019, I read his book about dogmatic statements, its very important what he tells about it, it mainly focused on religion, if people are radical religious please read the dogmatic statement what Russel says.

    • @BertrandRussell2
      @BertrandRussell2 Před rokem +2

      ‘’Scientific societies are as yet in their infancy… It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give governments much more control over individual mentality than they now have even in totalitarian countries. Fitche laid it down that education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished. Diet, injections(vaccines) and injunctions will combine, from very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible...’’ - Bertrand Russell, 1953
      He wants to Bring about the New World Order and make the world into 1984. WAKE UP!
      He's a satanist which is why he doesn't want you to believe in God or Spirits.

  • @mobiustrip1400
    @mobiustrip1400 Před 5 měsíci +1

    That's what sceptical enquiry will turn you into.

  • @vaxrvaxr
    @vaxrvaxr Před rokem +2

    Based and Bertrandpilled.

    • @BertrandRussell2
      @BertrandRussell2 Před rokem

      ‘’Scientific societies are as yet in their infancy… It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give governments much more control over individual mentality than they now have even in totalitarian countries. Fitche laid it down that education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished. Diet, injections(vaccines) and injunctions will combine, from very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible...’’ - Bertrand Russell, 1953
      He wants to Bring about the New World Order and make the world into 1984. WAKE UP!
      He's a satanist which is why he doesn't want you to believe in God or the spiritual..

    • @vaxrvaxr
      @vaxrvaxr Před rokem

      @@BertrandRussell2 And you're a lunatic, which is why you want us to believe in God or at least the spiritual.

  • @vicalieg
    @vicalieg Před 23 dny

    Can anyone tell me, what exactly are the ‘Christian dogmas’ to which he refers? To which authority would they be ascribed? Saint Paul? The Catholic Church or any other established church? Certain theologians? Christ himself, if I remember correctly, taught mostly through parables.

  • @thepalebluedot4171
    @thepalebluedot4171 Před 7 měsíci

    It was none other than the french sociologist thinker, Emile Durkheim who has explained about the very mechanism of the societal phenomenon called religion better than so many others before or after him... 🌐

  • @damonbernard2802
    @damonbernard2802 Před rokem +3

    Belief in magic/religion is no more than a warm blanket

  • @bonniejean2093
    @bonniejean2093 Před rokem +3

    The fool says in his heart, “There is no God.”
    - Psalm 14:1

  • @hawkeyenextgen7117
    @hawkeyenextgen7117 Před 4 měsíci

    Funnily enough, Mr. Russell’s reasons for not being a Christian are the reasons to which I myself am a Christian

  • @jespersorensen4462
    @jespersorensen4462 Před 2 lety +1

    Yep Mr Russell was ahead of his time. (Religion is a weakness.. Bob Dylan: "I just can't make it by myself".).

    • @BertrandRussell2
      @BertrandRussell2 Před rokem +1

      ‘’Scientific societies are as yet in their infancy… It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give governments much more control over individual mentality than they now have even in totalitarian countries. Fitche laid it down that education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished. Diet, injections(vaccines) and injunctions will combine, from very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible...’’ - Bertrand Russell, 1953
      He wants to Bring about the New World Order and make the world into 1984. WAKE UP!
      He's a satanist which is why he doesn't want you to believe in God or the spiritual.

  • @siyabulelatshali1012
    @siyabulelatshali1012 Před rokem +4

    😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣, "No, no, I think that's nonsense." 🤞 I love this man.

  • @ismailhakkisulucay4596

    Please provide the dialogue in text as well since the sound is not clear.

    • @BertrandRussell2
      @BertrandRussell2 Před rokem

      ‘’Scientific societies are as yet in their infancy… It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give governments much more control over individual mentality than they now have even in totalitarian countries. Fitche laid it down that education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished. Diet, injections(vaccines) and injunctions will combine, from very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible...’’ - Bertrand Russell, 1953
      He wants to Bring about the New World Order and make the world into 1984. WAKE UP!
      He's a satanist which is why he doesn't want you to believe in God or Spirits..

  • @ajoybaksi3654
    @ajoybaksi3654 Před 3 měsíci

    Very likely the greatest mind that "lived" during my lifetime; only close competitor would be Albert Einstein. Never untrue to himself or his beliefs. Rest in peace, sir.

  • @Samael-Metzger
    @Samael-Metzger Před rokem +3

    If arguably the greatest logical mind in human history can not logically justify believing in God then it is pretty safe to say god is absolute nonsense.

  • @familyvideoacct
    @familyvideoacct Před 2 lety +10

    We really need subtitles or captions on this. he makes great points you cant even hear

  • @stingray7074
    @stingray7074 Před 2 lety +2

    We are NOT created FOR Fun …..we are created in the First Place TO worship God…..GOD SAYS I AM A TREASURE WHO WANTS TO BE FOUND

    • @tijgertjekonijnwordopgegeten
      @tijgertjekonijnwordopgegeten Před 2 lety +4

      We have not been created for any reason

    • @BertrandRussell2
      @BertrandRussell2 Před rokem

      @@tijgertjekonijnwordopgegeten Read Betrands Russells Quote on Scientific Society's he's one of the Most evil men of his time a nasty Satanist.

  • @billthestinker
    @billthestinker Před 10 měsíci +3

    Tremendous courage to express his opinion

  • @TheMovieAlex
    @TheMovieAlex Před 2 lety

    Alright. Honestly. I listened to alot of interviews. My English isn't bad at all. But I couldn't understand most of the stuff he said, cause of the bad soundquality (maybe also because I was watching from my phone). I just found out about this guy, 30 minutes ago and can't stop watching interviews/biographys about him.
    Could someone do me a hughe favour and write his sayings down. Would interest me truly, but the mixture of bad sound quality + not motherlanguage speaker is horrible

  • @alexandriabaroque937
    @alexandriabaroque937 Před 7 měsíci +1

    In "A History of Western Philosophy" Russell states: "I do not myself believe that philosophy can either prove or disprove the truth of religious dogmas." Yet here he is categorically certain that there is no God or afterlife. This seems to be a contradiction, no?

    • @TheFelimon
      @TheFelimon Před 3 měsíci +1

      Any question or predicate involving god is not provable as it contains no observable referent, so questions of God are resigned to speculative metaphysics, something that philosophy (in Russells view) has no interest in. This is because it is not a question of logic.
      The idea of something creating the universe is not provable/disprovable precisely because it is not a matter of logic. If one is led by logic, he is led to believe god does not exist. However, that is not "proof" in the strictest sense.
      I cannot speak for Russell, but i do not view this as a contradiction.

    • @TheFelimon
      @TheFelimon Před 3 měsíci

      In attempt to make this more clear, to say im sure that there is no afterlife is to say 'my views are guided by reason, and there is no reason to believe in the afterlife' (reasons being rational or observable evidence)
      To say that we can disprove or prove the existence of the afterlife is to say 'i can show you through some anlysis of concepts, or observable phenomena, thay the afterlife certainly exists/doesnt exist'
      The first is rational, the second is impossible.

    • @milansvancara
      @milansvancara Před 3 měsíci +1

      No, it's not an contradiction. If something cannot be proven or disproven it doesn't mean there is any reason tobelieve that it's true.
      For example:
      If someone tells you that there is a leprechaun with unicorn dancing salsa together in a different galaxy, it cannot be proven or disproven, but it doesn't mean that you should think it is true. Do you understand?:)

  • @AYVYN
    @AYVYN Před 2 měsíci

    I believe he was agnostic, like most logicians. Talking about the afterlife requires too much linguistics for an answer that should ease one’s mind, but I believe the answer is optimistic.

  • @TheEvolvedprimate
    @TheEvolvedprimate Před 9 lety +1

    So smart.

  • @Poximab13
    @Poximab13 Před rokem +2

    Quite the opposite, further reading and experience gives you atheism.

  • @BuLYjonnybravo82
    @BuLYjonnybravo82 Před rokem +10

    I spent most of my life being an atheist and pondering the same questions until on argument without a doubt shook that and have not seen it refuted.
    Intelligent design and impossible sophistication and and balance of precision MUST be at the hands of a creator.
    Chaos does not lend itself to to this in any way
    However you want to refer to God is up to you, but the fact everything had a creator is simply obvious to me.

    • @vaxrvaxr
      @vaxrvaxr Před rokem +3

      Ponder again. "Intelligent design" must be at the hands of a creator, but you're presupposing that it is intelligent or designed. What you refer to as "impossible sophistication and balance" is obviously possible, otherwise it wouldn't exist. There is no reason it /has/ to be this way, it might as well just /happen/ to be this way. "The fact is obvious to me" translates to "I have a feeling".

    • @Poximab13
      @Poximab13 Před rokem +1

      To what degree is impossible? A sports team being down a bunch of points might lend the words " it's impossible for them to win now" we know it's not impossible but understand that it would be a very difficult feet so we deem it impossible,yet it's absolutely possible. Just because you don't see how it could be any other way than an intelligent creator doesn't mean it can't happen.

    • @jameseverett9037
      @jameseverett9037 Před rokem

      @@Poximab13 "Just because you don't see how it could be any other way than an intelligent creator doesn't mean it can't happen." Doesn't mean it did either. You just ignorantly argued for the great unlikelihood that it did though.

  • @benjaminbessett7798
    @benjaminbessett7798 Před rokem +1

    You shouldnt believe something if it isnt true. But by what basis does one come to truth? Why is there even a concept of truth if God doesnt exist to set the standard. We would only have personal opinion, like Bertrand Russell's, just one more belief among many. Therefore, in order for there to be truth and facts a personal God must exist.

    • @jameseverett9037
      @jameseverett9037 Před rokem +1

      The guy is incredibly, almost unbelievably shallow for being known as a "philosopher." I've never heard a real philosopher make such quaint and poorly thought-out assertions. He sounds like a 5-year old who's mad at his parents because he didn't get the bike for Christmas.

    • @AYVYN
      @AYVYN Před 2 měsíci +1

      He’s a logician; every conclusion follow a strict structure composed of evidence or proofs supporting it beyond any reasonable doubt. We know how oxygen was created. Is it an opinion that you need to breathe oxygen?

  • @Polynuttery
    @Polynuttery Před rokem +3

    LOL, how times have changed. Atheism is now intellectually dying and mostly dead, and Christianity is back in force. It has not made it back into the churches yet, but in the bedrock of the academy it is back. Christian apologetics is surging within many Christian communities and I’m personally feeling really good about the intellectual future of Christianity. #AnthonyFlew

  • @VincentVonDudler
    @VincentVonDudler Před rokem +1

    I hope to see Bertrand Russell at 'Blips and Chitz' after I die.
    Shake his hand or whatever the equivalent is in terms of the beings that are playing this simulation.

  • @stevennorton485
    @stevennorton485 Před rokem +1

    since what may be known about god is plain to them because god has made it plain to them for since the creation of the world gods invisable qualities his eternal power and divine nature have been clearly seen being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse, romans 1 v 19

  • @MarthamadaySaamanu
    @MarthamadaySaamanu Před 11 lety +3

    Soul? LOL!
    Any theory you have about a 'soul' or a 'feeling' is useless unless it can consistently predict the real world. This is not to say they are meaningless, but merely that they are not precise, just poetic. Surely Russell would know the loose way it is used in the language.

  • @moppt6495
    @moppt6495 Před 3 lety +2

    ❤️

  • @brankozeljeznjak
    @brankozeljeznjak Před 6 měsíci

    love him, "god" is pure logic, nothing else, undestroyable, omnipresent. however, reincarnation is absolutely true, the behavior of each individual has an impact on their reincarnation, this is also part of the healthy teaching of Jesus, demonstrably, this is where I differ from Mr. Russell, otherwise the man is completely correct.

  • @stelioeffrena6909
    @stelioeffrena6909 Před rokem +3

    Bertrand „Reddit“ Russel

    • @BertrandRussell2
      @BertrandRussell2 Před rokem +1

      ‘’Scientific societies are as yet in their infancy… It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give governments much more control over individual mentality than they now have even in totalitarian countries. Fitche laid it down that education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished. Diet, injections(vaccines) and injunctions will combine, from very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible...’’ - Bertrand Russell, 1953
      He wants to Bring about the New World Order and make the world into 1984. WAKE UP!
      He's a satanist which is why he doesn't want you to believe in God or Spirits..

  • @JohnMRockwell
    @JohnMRockwell Před 2 měsíci

    The Hitch of his time

  • @jmo8934
    @jmo8934 Před 5 dny

    People want and have always wanted to know the answers to the questions to how and why we are here. Hundreds and even thousands of years ago people knew far less than we do now and even now there is still plenty we don’t know so they had to make up the answers themselves. It’s obviously nonsense. Billions of years went by without any of us being here and nobody knew any different. There is still that question of how are we here and why is there something instead of nothing but the truth is that nobody knows the answer to that. It makes people living their lives by a series of manmade religious rules even more wasteful. They are literally wasting the almost certain one life that they have got.

  • @7146533
    @7146533 Před 11 lety +7

    he was a prolific thinker and writer - read his essay on the free mans worship - more inspiring than a burning bush or smiting your neighbor or promising hell

    • @bliots8369
      @bliots8369 Před rokem

      bro really said an essay is more inspiring than the presence of God

    • @7146533
      @7146533 Před rokem

      @@bliots8369 presence of who, dog? Does the world offend you?

    • @bliots8369
      @bliots8369 Před rokem

      @@7146533 I didn’t mean to sound offended or anything and I apologize if I was too harsh in what I said, but coming from where I am as a Christian who knows and loves God and who tries to live by his word, it seems silly to think that anything that comes from the mind of a human can be more inspiring or powerful than something that comes from the mind of God. And I know a lot of people don’t believe that the Bible came from the mind of God or even that there is a God in the first place, and I get it. No matter how hard you look, you can’t physically see God in the same way you can see the world. But there’s a reason so many people believe in him and love him. The Bible says we see God’s glory by the work of his hands. I just wish more people would look for God with an open heart and mind. I’ll read that essay with an open mind, and I hope you’ll do the same with the Bible.

    • @samuelbailey2000
      @samuelbailey2000 Před 6 měsíci +2

      @@bliots8369The bible didn’t come from the mind of god. At least not directly whether or not you believe in a god. They came from the minds of the people, claiming their experiences. The Bible is largely a recollection of stories pertaining to god or events surrounding a god, but it comes from the mind of mortals (I’m assuming). I find it ironic that you would hold it at higher value strictly on such a poor premise. For who is to say god did not inspire Russell to write his essays, god works in mysterious ways. There are likely logically rigorous arguments for gods existence, if you wish to be more compelling seek them out and also seek out what the compelling arguments against god are; then you will be able to be much more convincing.

  • @jessewallace12able
    @jessewallace12able Před rokem +2

    His ideal is “good”. As meaningless as what he imagined the concept of “God” to mean for believers.

    • @BertrandRussell2
      @BertrandRussell2 Před rokem

      ‘’Scientific societies are as yet in their infancy… It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give governments much more control over individual mentality than they now have even in totalitarian countries. Fitche laid it down that education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished. Diet, injections(vaccines) and injunctions will combine, from very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible...’’ - Bertrand Russell, 1953
      He wants to Bring about the New World Order and make the world into 1984. WAKE UP!
      He's a satanist which is why he doesn't want you to believe in God or Spirits..

  • @AtamMardes
    @AtamMardes Před 6 měsíci +3

    "Religion began when the first scoundrel met the first fool."
    Voltaire

  • @sedad5341
    @sedad5341 Před rokem +1

    He was a believer, he was believing in what he was saying and that's what a believer is, Russell lived for more than 90 years and was a top philosopher of 20th century and saying am not believer!, Get out of here.

    • @BertrandRussell2
      @BertrandRussell2 Před rokem

      ‘’Scientific societies are as yet in their infancy… It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give governments much more control over individual mentality than they now have even in totalitarian countries. Fitche laid it down that education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished. Diet, injections(vaccines) and injunctions will combine, from very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible...’’ - Bertrand Russell, 1953
      He wants to Bring about the New World Order and make the world into 1984. WAKE UP!
      He's a satanist which is why he doesn't want you to believe in God or Spirits..

  • @bobbart4198
    @bobbart4198 Před rokem

    ... " There is a PRACTICAL reason for Believing in God " @0:15 the interviewer states ... and what is that exactly ? ... Pascal's Wager was nothing more than a cop out - if you don't know what that is, look it up ... in the meantime, both Mr Russell and I are waiting for the answer ...

  • @bornaxo55
    @bornaxo55 Před 7 měsíci +1

    Seek God!

  • @susandrydenhenderson6234

    Isn’t this what most intelligent people think when they are about 13, until further reading and experience of life makes them understand religious teachings better.

    • @jameseverett9037
      @jameseverett9037 Před rokem

      Exactly. He never grew out of teenage hate for "authority" or greater and longer experience.

  • @peterwesolowski5223
    @peterwesolowski5223 Před 9 měsíci

    Absolutely the concept of plural multiple Universes applies randomness not creationism. If that is the logic then logic is the most unlogical science of all of them.

  • @MotoWorld777
    @MotoWorld777 Před rokem +2

    Sad, seems so wise and yet does not believe in the creator.

    • @leej70
      @leej70 Před rokem +2

      Why would he?

    • @jameseverett9037
      @jameseverett9037 Před rokem

      He seems wise? In what way? He sounded like a 5 year old rehearsing a frequently concocted tantrum to me.

  • @MrGMawson2438
    @MrGMawson2438 Před měsícem

    Bert is good

  • @shuaybmhd
    @shuaybmhd Před rokem

    🖤

  • @amellirizarry9503
    @amellirizarry9503 Před 2 lety +1

    what a Chad

  • @maSHEALY
    @maSHEALY Před 9 měsíci +1

    Simple common sense

  • @markfurnell6748
    @markfurnell6748 Před 2 lety +2

    Science says seeing is believing. But GOD says believing is seeing! He will NOT place HIMSELF under man's microscope. I expect Russell is no longer an atheist...".the fool has said in his heart there is no God"....Bible

    • @BertrandRussell2
      @BertrandRussell2 Před rokem

      Of Course He knows God is real but he was a High Ranking Satanist pushing the 1984 agenda of the UN and the New World Order. Listen to Alex Jones!
      All our science is just Lies by Evil people and Eugenecists its Dogma

  • @calohtar
    @calohtar Před 11 lety +3

    Lmfao I need to start doing this to people

  • @augustorafaelpereira6505

    He don't realize that he get knowledge because of thinking of catholics dogma, the first cause of knowledge.😂

  • @johnnya9001
    @johnnya9001 Před rokem +4

    The dogma is not good, the moral lessons are good. When life gets really tough it can offer some solace. I like the expression; "there are no atheist's in foxholes".

  • @stoyanfurdzhev
    @stoyanfurdzhev Před 2 lety +1

    From the mouth of the master of false assumptions, it sounds almost like an heresy.

  • @drbonesshow1
    @drbonesshow1 Před rokem +1

    When Bert lost at the track he gave up on the idea of God.

    • @BertrandRussell2
      @BertrandRussell2 Před rokem +1

      ‘’Scientific societies are as yet in their infancy… It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give governments much more control over individual mentality than they now have even in totalitarian countries. Fitche laid it down that education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished. Diet, injections(vaccines) and injunctions will combine, from very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible...’’ - Bertrand Russell, 1953
      He wants to Bring about the New World Order and make the world into 1984. WAKE UP!
      He's a satanist which is why he doesn't want you to believe in God or Spirits..

  • @user-ky5dy5hl4d
    @user-ky5dy5hl4d Před 3 měsíci

    We die and turn to dust.

    • @MichaelTheCorpse
      @MichaelTheCorpse Před měsícem

      Correct, Genesis 3:19
      "By the sweat of your brow
      you will eat your food
      until you return to the ground,
      since from it you were taken;
      for dust you are
      and to dust you will return"

    • @user-ky5dy5hl4d
      @user-ky5dy5hl4d Před měsícem

      @@MichaelTheCorpse What I meant by turning into dust is that it is the end of you and there is no heaven, hell, devil, angels and there is no god or gods. You become dust and you are no longer. You don't have to cite the bible. Even prehistoric mammals knew that.

    • @MichaelTheCorpse
      @MichaelTheCorpse Před měsícem

      @@user-ky5dy5hl4d I know that's what you meant, but as a religious man, I was pointing out that we too believe that after we die we eventually turn into dust.

    • @user-ky5dy5hl4d
      @user-ky5dy5hl4d Před měsícem

      @@MichaelTheCorpse Therefore, life is senseless.

  • @TheSimonBOULDER
    @TheSimonBOULDER Před 11 lety +4

    Is "It doesn't happen very often" on deathbed conversions the best argument that the great philosopher and thinker of 21st century can come up with?

    • @paulbrocklehurst7253
      @paulbrocklehurst7253 Před 4 lety +9

      I'd say it's spot on. I remember when Christopher Hitchens was diagnoised with terminal cancer & I even predicted that as soon as he was in his grave people would start making up stories about him turning to Christ in his final hours & guess what? As soon as he was dead the internet was awash with exactly such claims just as I had predicted they would be. Someone even cashed in on the claim & wrote a book stating that he had because *they knew there was plenty of £$£$ to be made once he was 6 foot under* & unable to call them out. So much for 'Thou shalt not bear false witness' eh? I guess it's just fine & dandy to do so if you want to pretend that atheists are all Christians after all. How did I know that would happen? The same was claimed as soon as Darwin died. Funny how these conversions never happen a little earlier when the atheists in question can be heard saying they've found Jesus for themselves isn't it eh?

    • @theguardian6464
      @theguardian6464 Před 4 lety +2

      @@paulbrocklehurst7253 As a Christian Catholic I still agree with you on a fact that there are many made-up deathbed conversions which is not fine (telling a lie is not ok) . But you never know. I'm just saying that "Deathbed conversions do not happen very often" is not an argument based on facts that men like this seem to be after all the time.

    • @seanb6626
      @seanb6626 Před 2 lety

      what other argument is needed? christians like to act high and mighty when they convert people and it doesn't happen. simple as that

    • @seanb6626
      @seanb6626 Před 2 lety +3

      @@theguardian6464 seeing as the christian faith lacks a multitude of factual foundation I don't think you're particularly entitled to critique him on that

    • @glenallen7047
      @glenallen7047 Před 2 lety

      Why don't you elaborate on what the Bible doesn't have for factual foundation because if you read the the Bible it covers everything from how the earth was created to how we should take care of ourselves, others, how we feel, what to avoid. I tried to prove the Bible wrong and ended up seeing how right it truly was maybe instead of saying its not factual try reading and proving what in the Bible is wrong

  • @JohnB-uf7ft
    @JohnB-uf7ft Před 2 lety +1

    Can you prove love? Can you prove faith?

  • @mesija89
    @mesija89 Před 11 lety +1

    It is not an argument. Please learn what an argument is before you go ask questions about them.

  • @Lukas-cm2b
    @Lukas-cm2b Před měsícem

    i understand a shit

  • @glitteresque
    @glitteresque Před 3 lety +2

    well, I still believe my beliefs

    • @seanb6626
      @seanb6626 Před 2 lety

      and they are still wrong

    • @FelisThis
      @FelisThis Před 2 lety

      On his death bed he sought repentance. Hopefully that was enough for him to enter
      Paradise.

    • @FelisThis
      @FelisThis Před 2 lety

      @@karlharrison4726
      Very true, friend. God Bless.
      🙏✝️☮️💙🕊🙏

    • @BertrandRussell2
      @BertrandRussell2 Před rokem

      @@seanb6626 You'd be suprised to know that the majority of every non ironic religions beliefs are true. They are sometimes tainted with Dogma or get a few things wrong but Mostly True nonetheless.

  • @BAFREMAUXSOORMALLY
    @BAFREMAUXSOORMALLY Před rokem +1

    What he was saying was that he did not give a damn about human happiness or suffering! Great philosopher indeed!
    BAFS

    • @vaxrvaxr
      @vaxrvaxr Před rokem +4

      Interesting interpretation.

    • @BAFREMAUXSOORMALLY
      @BAFREMAUXSOORMALLY Před rokem

      @@vaxrvaxr I wonder how an ATHEIST can be qualified to speak about God although we saw one Bill Gates being celebrated by the ruling tyrants as the Pope on health matters with zero qualification in Medicine???

    • @BertrandRussell2
      @BertrandRussell2 Před rokem +1

      ‘’Scientific societies are as yet in their infancy… It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give governments much more control over individual mentality than they now have even in totalitarian countries. Fitche laid it down that education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished. Diet, injections(vaccines) and injunctions will combine, from very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible...’’ - Bertrand Russell, 1953
      He wants to Bring about the New World Order and make the world into 1984. WAKE UP!
      He's a satanist which is why he doesn't want you to believe in God or the spiritual.

    • @funtimes8296
      @funtimes8296 Před rokem

      As opposed to... religious people?

    • @BAFREMAUXSOORMALLY
      @BAFREMAUXSOORMALLY Před rokem

      @@BertrandRussell2
      Satanists are the world biggest parasites!

  • @bvierville1
    @bvierville1 Před rokem

    Some people are just too smart for God

    • @BertrandRussell2
      @BertrandRussell2 Před rokem +1

      ‘’Scientific societies are as yet in their infancy… It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give governments much more control over individual mentality than they now have even in totalitarian countries. Fitche laid it down that education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished. Diet, injections(vaccines) and injunctions will combine, from very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible...’’ - Bertrand Russell, 1953
      He wants to Bring about the New World Order and make the world into 1984. WAKE UP!
      He's a satanist which is why he doesn't want you to believe in God or Spirits..

    • @BertrandRussell2
      @BertrandRussell2 Před rokem +1

      Hows those boosters treating you. Look up Chlorine Dioxide and DMSO if you want to save yourself and everyone you know

    • @jameseverett9037
      @jameseverett9037 Před rokem

      @@BertrandRussell2 good info, thanks. I'll pass it on.

    • @divemylollol6152
      @divemylollol6152 Před 10 měsíci

      Some ppl are too dumb to acknowledge that everything has a Creator
      The fool has says in his heart There’s no God you fool

  • @kirkyturki1546
    @kirkyturki1546 Před měsícem

    A wise man for sure, but I'm gonna have to agree to disagree with him on this one.

  • @josephkanti9102
    @josephkanti9102 Před měsícem

    Russell is wrong on this. Of course it is useful to hold a belief because it is useful and not necessarily true. For example, there may be no evidence whatsoever that a sprinter can win a foot race but by believing that they have a chance, it can and ordinarily does lift their perforance even if it doesn't necessarily result in a win. Hardcore logicians and philosophers often talk themselves out of common sense results present in every-day psychology.

    • @LordGreystoke
      @LordGreystoke Před měsícem

      Not if you aspire to live an honest life, which means being honest with yourself and that you care more about the truth than living with a lie, even if you delude yourself into performing better as a sprinter. Russell cared more about truth than anything else.

    • @wander67
      @wander67 Před měsícem

      @@LordGreystoke Cared so much that he constantly changed his political views to ones that benefiet him the most, and constantly contradicted himself.

  • @YT-uo7fc
    @YT-uo7fc Před 2 lety +6

    There is no religion at all.
    There is philosophy and people who follow a particular philosophy according to their intelligence.

  • @giuseppinasalvucci628
    @giuseppinasalvucci628 Před rokem +2

    Afterlife is a reality

    • @leej70
      @leej70 Před rokem +2

      How do you know?

    • @divemylollol6152
      @divemylollol6152 Před 10 měsíci

      @@leej70afterlife is a reality from facts
      But how do you know we pick the right religion?

    • @leej70
      @leej70 Před 10 měsíci

      @@divemylollol6152 What facts?

    • @divemylollol6152
      @divemylollol6152 Před 10 měsíci

      @@leej70 religious experiences

    • @leej70
      @leej70 Před 10 měsíci +1

      @@divemylollol6152 I don't think you know what facts are.

  • @0004W
    @0004W Před 25 dny

    I can say now that I am a confirmed atheist 😂

  • @kellykyunghan3317
    @kellykyunghan3317 Před 2 lety

    evel

    • @BertrandRussell2
      @BertrandRussell2 Před rokem

      ‘’Scientific societies are as yet in their infancy… It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give governments much more control over individual mentality than they now have even in totalitarian countries. Fitche laid it down that education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished. Diet, injections(vaccines) and injunctions will combine, from very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible...’’ - Bertrand Russell, 1953
      He wants to Bring about the New World Order and make the world into 1984. WAKE UP!
      He's a satanist which is why he doesn't want you to believe in God or Spirits..
      Spread this Quote.