Krita vs Photoshop
Vložit
- čas přidán 4. 08. 2024
- Both Photoshop and Krita are high-quality applications for digital painting, photo editing, or designing. If you're new to these programs it can be difficult to understand how they work because of the underlying grid system that both use (or in other words, the raster technology).
The two software are very similar, but they also have certain features that set them apart.
We’ll help you decide which one is right for you by comparing them head-to-head!
____________________________
00:00 intro
00:29 What is Krita?
01:04 What is Photoshop?
01:35 Interface and learning curve
02:24 Compatibility
03:17 Tools & Features
07:28 pricing
07:50 final
_____________________________
Credit/ image thumbnail by artist: Kikvinio
____________________________________________
Inspirationtuts 3D Channel:
/ inspirationtuts
inspirationTuts CAD Channel:
/ inspirationtutscad
Help me Create More Content:
/ inspirationtuts1
Facebook page
/ inspirationtuts2d
Alternative title:
Would you like to be constantly robbed by a program that was never meant for painting,
Or would you like a program meant for painting that continuously gets updates and is actually made by artists.
Adobe and other tech megacorps: "You will perpetually owe us money and own nothing. Be happy."
open source: "You will own everything and owe us nothing. (We'll appreciate any code or money you can spare us though.)"
"Would you WANT to be robbed, or NOT be robbed? | Photoshop vs Krita"
there, shortened, and better, imo, idk xd
I respect Photoshop as industry standard, but I prefer Krita. I went to Art School, learned Photoshop as it's own course and everything, passed with an A+ and kept up with it since; but Krita is easier to use, and in my honest opinion, the better choice. I can do in Krita what I can do in Photoshop. 5.0 is stellar, and the community has made great strides in customized tools. I will always love Photoshop, but Krita has been my go-to for nearly 2 - 3 years now. I even tried Paint Tool Sai for a hot minute and prefer it over that.
I thought the video was good but the conclusions seemed like a cop out. Basically you said Photoshop is better because everyone uses it instead of pointing out what it does better.
It really did. "Photoshop is better because, of course, it is" is not an objective verdict. If you like Photoshop more than Krita, then that's completely fine. Actually, both are great. It's just that Photoshop is older, so the things Krita does now Photoshop already did them a while ago. But in 2022? Use any, use both, whatever suits you better. They're ... I'd said 80% compatible with each other.
Key differences so far being:
The protect alpha function in Krita is not something that Photoshop understands as Clipping Mask even when they're supposed to do the same thing.
In Photoshop, you can make a straight line by pressing on point a and then point b (anchoring the line basically, so it's super fast).
Krita doesn't have a Replace Color function like Photoshop
Both layouts and routes to SOME tools are a bit different, but they're there, I can assure it.
Other than that? Yeah, they're pretty much comparable to one another.
Adobe, for some reason froze my CS3 which I paid for in full on my Mac computer. I hated them for this. So I downloaded Krita for free. At first it was a pain to learn a new digital program having used PS since 1998. But after a few months I liked it. Now I have the new Krita, 5.0, and it is much better than the 4.0 version. The hell with Adobe.
Yes, Adobe did that and then had the nerve to ignore their CS3 customers that brought it to their attention.
the hell with these greedy AF tech giants, non profit open source software is the way to go
If we want to animate in Photoshop then obviously we have to pay for after effects and animate cc but krita gives all in once
Show, don't tell. I have noticed that you do a lot of narrated commentary on these software's but never show us how these features differ from one another. For example, if you claim the brushes of one software are better than the other...... than demo the difference. I would really love to see how they stack up against one another. ;)
Both are great. The thing with Photoshop is that the things that Krita does now (on Krita 5.0) Photoshop does it since a long time ago and the industry has standardized it. BUT Krita as it is now is enough to rival Photoshop in tools, capabilities, learning curve and overall result capabilities and workflows. AND it's FREE. You're getting a tool that can give Photoshop a run for its money and it's free. I believe that if you are an independent artist (beginner or pro) you can get amazing results with Krita. And if you manage to move into the industry then the transition will be a lot easier than one may think.
2:53 this is sinix designs painting and he's using Coral Painter.
Sooner or later Adobe Photoshop will be long forgotten because:-
1. Customers had to pay monthly subscription fee in order to use Photoshop consistently. Sometimes the fee can be expensive.
2. Krita is gaining it's popularity day by day + it's free. Furthermore, krita is updating it's software time by time.
and its open source too with artists themselves helping improve it
Gimp too
Hi! thank you so much for making this video , it helps a lot for the beginners just like me..
Glad it was helpful! Thank you for the feedback
Krita has funny dynamic brush that makes spirals.
Well, what I think is: Krita absolutely blows Photoshop out of the water with its brushes. Photoshop is marginally better in a number of things people actually don't care about, and most of the time they only serve to clog up its UI. The filtering and tone mapping stuff you showed can be done in Krita, too. Although I agree it's not as intuitive as Photoshop.
There's absolutely no reason to give Adobe monthly payments for that thing. Open source software has been winning the war against proprietary for a long while now. In fact, every time I see someone trying to put proprietary stuff in a project, I just think of a mediocre professional who's going to waste a lot of time and money from the company just to have a third party to support him when he can't do the stuff he was hired for.
"In fact, every time I see someone trying to put proprietary stuff in a project, I just think of a mediocre professional who's going to waste a lot of time and money from the company just to have a third party to support him when he can't do the stuff he was hired for."
I agree with you. Sorry for this joke but I thought the same about the AI "artists".
Heck there is open source versions of the AI as well. I have even played with some of them. Not saying it should replace human artists or anything. It's just interesting that even that can be open sourced. They don't perform quite as well, but it's not bad and will improve with time.@@antoniostrina82
omg i didn't expect to find a 2022 video i taught I would find old videos
can you review Light Brush?
Can someone explain to me how to get an iPad app for Krita? I downloaded Krita for Mac os but my iPad won't install it do anything with the download file
I know this is a late comment but I am bored.
Krita doesn't work on iPads and the chances of it being available are slim(however Apple currently is getting a lawsuit and that might change). You can try using wine on the file and see if that runs it.
what photo editing capabilities and graphic design Krita has?
Krita is for painting. Why r you asking?
This video is great! I'm using Krita at the moment. Just finished & uploaded my first cartoon
Share with us!
Dude can you share it with us?
WE CAN ANIMATE ON IT?
You forgot Krita is available for Android as well. It has it's bugs, but it is nice to put on a Tab S4 or higher and use the pen. Big enough tablet and its very nice!
Photoshop: great for graphics design work involving photos, text, and maybe some artistic digital touch ups with brushes
Krita: good if you want to focus solely on drawing/painting/sketching, and create finished artworks, with no extra steps (Photoshop default brushes are hard to work with)
Photoshop: payed
Krita: free
Question: Krita can do raw conversions? Or is it merely that you can open raw files in Krita? Thanks!
It does support RAW files as it is, and it has a few useful tools in the RAW editing panel. However, our team finds it a little limited (compared to PS at least).
Krita performs much better on Linux, for some reason it just feels smoother and more responsive (like using CSP on Windows). If you are on Windows CSP is better choice IMO.
yeahh but krita is free
Se hace una combinación de krita blender e inkscape para lograr edición de imágenes profesional
Krita, because it's free / open source
I got a Photoshop ad
no doubt the thumbnail nailed it, attack titan did beat armored titan, this is pure foreshadowning
I'm a simple man, I see attack on titan thunmbaneil , I click
lmao i dont even know what krita was and I dint even know that a software called krita existed
I feel ya man xD lol... We're glad that we could spread the word in such an unusual way. Try it maybe? I can tell you from first-hand experience that it's awesome!
@@InspirationTuts2D aight imma gonna try krita and amek eren jeager lmao anyways lol are you in the latest episode of aot yet?
Ps user 🥰
I choose Eren
Krita..??
Krita does not have infinite canvas OR an "AI assistant". What????
basicaly krita is how linux to apple sits
Short answer is Photoshop at its core, is an image editor and arguably the best at what it does. It's a swiss army knife for other purposes besides art. Krita at its core is for art with the capacity for image editing and animation. They work best together.
Gimp > Photoshop
Krita Gemeni exists. 😐
Your praises of Photoshop are noted but I simply refuse to pay Adobe that kind of money so over 4 years ago I began learning its free emulator, Gimp. Gimp has its detractors; not everything about it has as elegant of a workflow as PS and yes some things could be better....but. it. is. free. It does everything Photoshop does that I need it to and improves all the time.
With the aid of the University of CZcams I've become a decently skilled intermediate level digital painter, photomanipulator and am good at repairing images of old, damaged vintage photographs. But once I began using Krita and learning more about the fundamentals of art and drawing, it became obvious how ill-suited Gimp was to this specific form of creativity. I agree that they can and should be used together in a complimentary fashion...but save yourself the money altogether and support the open-sourced software. Adobe is making plenty of money convincing everyone that they are the 'king of...all the things.' There is at least one other extremely functional option and I for one am an enthusiastic user of the alternative.
In my humble opinion, Krita can replace both GIMP and Photoshop, just some features are different in their use, but if you figure how to use them, they are effective at the same level.
I appreciate the video but the wacky transitions are overused and nauseating.
Thanks a lot for the feedback! We'll definitely take it into consideration
@@InspirationTuts2D Thank you for listening! I may have been a bit too direct, so I apologize if it came off a bit harsh. Thank you again for your work!
What about Procreate?
Seen people make amazing works with it and it seems.... Easier'?
But its only on Ipad 🤮
It is good only for quick drawings. It's workflow is bad. Art studio pro is the photoshop alternative for iPad.
@@dixit8611 procreate has a literally 'apple' style which love to conclude everything so anyone who doesn't good at computer can use it but end up hide every function and need special techniques to use
Photoshop is the teacher of all and krita the best student.
We all know it's clip studio paint
Phtoshop is bloted and slow. Your final argument has little to back it up.
Adobie rentware is not work the price when you compare what you get from Krita and Affinity.
Krita is much better at doing paint-like brushes
Also, Affininty designer runs rings around Illistrator.
Photoshop: No future, wasted investment
Krita: constantly improving quality investment with a future
20 dollars a month for a year since they have only a year subcription. if you wanna quit before that they charge you the year. Also stock photos are paid now you have to pay another 20$ to be able to use the service.
V..V so krita can't work well for photo editing? =/
It's decent actually, but definitely not as much as Photoshop :')
@@InspirationTuts2D guess gotta dive deeper into it. Thank you so much
@Linden Reaper OK thank you... I'll start looking into gimp more
@Linden Reaper lol yeah I'm lesrninged thr hard way that I can't do certain things the way I was learned.. some things are just a few extra steps.. but it's ok. It's all there and it's free for the community. Thank you so much
@Linden Reaper bro photoshop is way better for photo-editing lmao and you also know it but your just acting like photoshop is garbage becuz ur broke and don't wanna pay money to adobe lmao but have you ever heard the word called" cracked/pirated? yeah you can get photoshop for free, lifetime lmao I pirated photoshop and so should you
Apples to oranges.
Those sound like two fruits that can be compared quite easily :D
Why do a i have a feeling this video is ai generated