Great lecture thank you :) Don't know why people complain about speed when they can change playback speed. For me, it was too slow and I watched at 1.25x
The inversion is "split" over the two halves of the array. That is for the inverstion (i,j) such that A[i] > A[j], i is less than or equal to n/2, while j > n/2
you know, this is a real stanford class, and stanford students don't take the class to learn anything, most of them already know the stuff. I agree this is rather bad teaching for 1st time learners. anyway, many of us already know the stuff, so who cares.
Awesome ...nice lectures ever found
Thank you very much Sir. When we did this in class i didn't understand how the merge and count worked but you explained it well....Much appreciated.
Brilliant!!!!
Great lecture thank you :) Don't know why people complain about speed when they can change playback speed. For me, it was too slow and I watched at 1.25x
Play at 0.75 to listen to the human version of the lecture.
its not that fast if you know the topic
@@forerstpump we wouldnt be watching this if we did
Nice lecture. But too fast.
Fantastic
very nice sir
The text is quite unreadable (
why doesn't he just call it inversion ? why is using the split word ? any significance ?
The inversion is "split" over the two halves of the array. That is for the inverstion (i,j) such that A[i] > A[j], i is less than or equal to n/2, while j > n/2
watch the previous video
sorry but I dont understand you, you talk very fast.
Bad lecture. I stop here, bye!
Care to elaborate? I find it rather easy to follow.
you know, this is a real stanford class, and stanford students don't take the class to learn anything, most of them already know the stuff. I agree this is rather bad teaching for 1st time learners. anyway, many of us already know the stuff, so who cares.