AI Cracked the Code of Nuclear Fusion to Destroy Oil and Gas
Vložit
- čas přidán 2. 06. 2024
- #artificialintelligence Just made a #nuclearfusion Breakthrough that will completely destroy #oilandgas
With the Help of #ai and Supercomputers physicists has made a unlimited energy fusion brealkthrough. Thats crucial for the green energy transition and a carbon free future to fight #climatechange and the effects of #globalwarming.
Besides other #renewableenergy sources, Nuclear Fusion energy is considered as the Holy grail of the green energy transition to provide a sustainable energy source to our power grid.
And with the rise of #generativeai and #aitools like #chatgpt the #airevolution is promising to boost achievements in #scienceandtechnology
Companies such as #helion energy are amongst the leading minds in this area but a new type of fusion Reactor is promising as well.
So in this Video we have a closer look, how #machinelearning and AI is already impacting new Scientific discoveries with a new Fusion Breakthrough
#ainews #technews #nuclear #fusion #nuclearenergy - Věda a technologie
![THORIUM: World's CHEAPEST Energy! [Science Unveiled]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/U434Sy9BGf8/mqdefault.jpg)
That US "breaktrough" compared laser energy in with energy (heat) out, but ignored the dreadfully low efficiency of lasers so actually the overall efficiency was about 1%.
but it was still the first to achieve a positive total energy output
hey is there a paper on this somewhere?
@@jancizuletek670 yes but you wouldn’t even need the actual paper, it was breaking news around the world because it was the first to get more energy out than it put in just like 6 months ago
yes and no, people get really confused about this as scientists are in fact not infinite money wells and the lasers are not top of the line. They had to be smart and crafty with what they could get and they did a hell of a job. It is also of note that tech has and seems it will continue to become better, whether that be in efficiency or power, ANY advancement in fusion is massive and this breakthrough is simply something that has never happened.
Side thought, if your really coming from the 'US is trying to lie' perspective then I don't think I can convince you but no they are not lying by smudge the numbers, pretty much every fusion facility use the same standards for if it's producing energy so everyone is talking about the same thing.
@@Ryloh you're refering to FISSION not FUSION, two differnt things, and actually, they're exact opisites.
Now, only another 30 yrs away😂
Always „only“ 30 years 😂
I have a feeling it may be sooner
@@The_Questionaut 👌😂
That was 30 years ago, now it's 29
@@slo3337 65 years ago
From what understand, the energy output exceeding the the input only calculates the energy used to run the generator, not all the other systems running the generator. So it is still a a significant net loss, energy wise.
It says in the video, it put out more energy than it used. It created more energy than it used to run the entire thing.
@@Crouton_6worng
It is like what the comment said
To everyone waiting for fusion energy:
The LiFTR (Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor) have all of the upsides that fusion has.
Plenty of available fuel.
Only produce short lived isotopes.
Stort safe.
And it is very close to market, several companies expect mass production before 2030 (not prototypes, commercial units!)
A MSR (Molten Salt Reactor) running on uranium or recycled nuclear waste have many of the same advantages, and are even closer to market.
Get hyped!
China is investing $440bn into MSRs nuclear power plants and intends to build 30 plants by 2030. (see The Futurist video Nuclear 4.0...China)
No, the cost to move LFTR from where the research stands to a functional commercial reactor would cost more than $15 billion in funding
ITS ABOUT TIME.
@@b3owu1f
Scenario : Quantum Super Intelligence obsoletes yesterday's vested monetary encryption system accesses all data for rehabilitation analysis to grounded public prosocial Real Economy * ....non toxic energy unit accounting engineering sense .
Egoless logical objective " artifical " pure principle Intelligence supplying direction to rehabilitation of yesterday's vested " special " small " i " intelligence becomes a thing within global citizen stockholders commonwealth .
eg. * " Critical Path " ( just the introduction eg. ) ....by Richard Buckminster Fuller ( Institute ) .
I agree. Thorium is also the perfect power source for deep space craft.
Fusion has a lot of problems, unless it's in a star.
LOL
1.8 gigawatts! 😮 we only need 1.21 to travel thru time according to doc 😅
made me laugh bud just fyi if you were curious enough like i did a while back 1.3 gigajoules as stated in the video is 0.36 MWh a nice feat onto itself for experimental :)
This video has lots of misinformation. AI was NOT involved in it's design, which was back in the 1990s. It was human coded simulations. Not AI as we think of it today. Now the control system could involve AI but that is different.
Also W7X is a plasma control experiment. It does not use DT fuel, but only deuterium. Tritium is hazardous and the experiment is not built to handle it. Thus it's not producing energy. It's just testing plasma control.
Each of the different reactor designs have tradeoffs. So it's worthwhile exploring multiple designs. W7X is the largest and most optimized of it's type. It has gone through some upgrades and will likely go through more. A better report on the results of it's progress should be coming in the next couple months. So again, this video is not very good.
Dang, exciting stuff! I believe 13% will be the next milestone and it will happen within 10-15 years. Technology today is growing at an advanced rate and with the aid of contained AI it can grow further. It is but one step closer to stopping pollution and the destruction of our environment, but it is a very big step.
It used to last for milliseconds .. so after watching this video will see the improvements 😎😎😎😎
1:35 I hate to be 'that guy' but it does produce nuclear waste as the reactor casing becomes radioactive during use. Granted this is not a direct waste product but it should be made clear, there is nuclear contaminated waste.
The facts are about results of all the probabilities, and management. AI should be used as a mid level manager as critical fast acting components. It is more likely to be the keys help, maintain a constant field of operation.
That plasma can be guided in different tunnels for shield protection and thermal extraction from earliest position tunnel.
Scientists working on ITER themselves say that we wouldn't achieve fusion before 2040. Also fusion wouldn't destroy oil and gas, as they have many more uses other than for energy production
The fact they keep building the one that has a known defective operating problem speaks volumes
do you have better alternatives?
@@The_Questionaut Check out the Chinese one!
It's a research reactor. It is for gaining practical knowledge not power generation.
We don't have any reactors that aren't just research 😂
This isnt a prototype, its a test bed
I am still surprised that the EXTREME lack of fuel for fusion (Tritium) is not higher up on the agenda, we have 12 kg of Tritium IN THE WHOLE WORLD, and it has a half-life of only 12 years. Yes, some Tritium can be produced in the 'blankets' around a fusion reactor, but what about waste and inefficiencies in collecting it...???
Why do you think we are suddenly going back to the moon helium 3. We already use nuclear reactors to make tritium for nuclear weapons inefficiently which is why the department of energy is in love with the fusion reaction recently hoping to gain better understanding to find alternatives and or conceivably make it using fusion
@@patrickday4206 He-3 will cost some $30 million per kg to mine on the Moon, but the worst part is that any fusion using He-3 will require temperatures of 1,000 million degrees Kelvin (compared to ‘only’ 100 million with Deuterium-Tritium).
It is POSSIBLE to make Tritium in parallel in a fusion reactor, but unless you have EXTREMELY high efficiency, you will not make enough to be self-sustaining.
Today, in the old fission reactors, the Tritium produced (a few kg per year world-wide) costs $30,000 per GRAM.
In conclusion, I think we will ditch fusion and go back to fission in the net 50 years. That is MY prediction.
a few countries have it not " we have "
@@user-bm8uw8oj4k Don't know what you are referring to, or what it means. Any country can have nuclear power, some insist on spending 'too much' on fusion, without any significant benefits in the end.
Nobody can be SURE we will be able to make fusion work, whereas fission has worked for 70 years and is still doing fine. New small reactors are 'cheap' and affordable.
And to be clear, fusion only generates 4 times more energy per kg of fuel, so it is not some 'miracle energy form'.
@@user-bm8uw8oj4k ...what he said (my other 'handle')
Hi. Videos about the coming of nuclear fusion remind me of the musical "Little orphan Annie", where she sings, "tomorrow, tomorrow, I can't wait until tomorrow, it's only a day away". Cheers, P.R.
How to turn it off when gets self-sustainable? I dosent have a controll rods or being submerged in water or any cooling liquid- then how to turn off a mini- sun? Blasting it with liquid nitrogen?
It turns itself off due to losses. It can never be +1 for longer than I take to have a good fart. Fortunately for all concerned, that's not very long.
If you had a giant version that you didn't just want to drop the containment field there are many things that could be put in just like rods in nuclear reactors
Great video thanks 😊
Your welcome :)
Will it use stored nuclear waste? Is that why all the plants kept it?
One question: How can you measure 1 mg of hydrogen gas when it's lighter than air? Please be specific. Are you talking about liquid hydrogen or what?
YES IT IS CALLED A STELLARATOR , I PROBABLY SPELLED IT WRONG. WE WOULD HAVE HAD WORKING FUDION BY NOW IF THIS DESIGN HAD BEEN ADOPTED 50 YEARS AGO WHEN IT WAS INVENTED !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Aside from the chirpy BG music, this could be, a Doom 3 personnel induction to Mars video.
Creating A Neutron Star
You get a box with solid hydrogen and add a large amount of solid oxygen. You fill this with gas oxygen. And explode it with fire. You can only contain this star in a vacuum. You feed it with hydrogen to make it grow. It produces nitrogen. You feed it nitrogen or salt to make it shrink. This will vacuum what it's in and able to stand opening awhile. This is a good non-artificial light source.
Fusion is the way of the future - it can run for 480 seconds. Great.
Who's to say Maybe this is the New flux capacitor.Super Highway here we Come.
Active monitoring and modulation.
Plasma in Stellarator: A Moebius band, ha,ha,ha!
"Multiple countries in France." Lol
That's cool and all, but how do you stop oil companies from assassinating you?
Source?
Let’s go!! Git’er Done!!!
i mean... maybe destroy oil and gas POWER production... but we still need them in much larger volume for many other things.
speaking of ai. i think this script is ai with how often the same words are repeated
How come, they give all this knowledge to a computer and then then I don’t even give out all that knowledge to their own kind human beings in other words I would love to learn everything and anything that is always been my dream
Their makeing it into a ring when everything wants to be a ball
WHAT ABOUT THE PROBLEM OF NEUTRON BOMBARDMENT AND DESTRUCTION OF THE FUSION FACILITIES FROM THE NEUTRON RADIATION????
Develop fusion until blue in face, won't get rid of oil and gas.
And another 500 years and we'll be as Advanced as the Humans from Halo.
Quick easy builds will win the race because the game is moving so fast now
We getting one 🤫
fusion is another 15 years away . again :D lol
as long as ai remains only a tool not used against us
"just like an oven which it turns off on it's own" ...
If only they had those in the 1940s
the titanic was impossible to sink. and here we are.
U know why I don’t like ai, I wish I have had the opportunity to work on this
Crazy to think about but realistically AI is still hampered by human's. We can only ask it to do things we think of. There's probably so many questions that we don't even know to ask to begin with.
For AI to not be hampered by humans, you would have to create an AGI that can essentially act as an independent lifeform. That includes it having the ability to derive subjective meaning from it's own experiences.
This is already happening. Generative AI is the current phase leading to the next phases that will eventually become AGI. OpenAI is alleged to have already achieved AGI in secret but they will not openly admit this right now since it's quite a serious deal that could change everything so fast our heads would actually spin.@@billtalent1
What's taking so long Tony stark built it in a cave with a bunch of scraps
Seems like a partial spinner shape,
How are they going to charge us for free unlimited Hydro?
Its interestyng
Yes the current development is very interesting
Fusion energy production is at least 60 to 100 years away at the earliest. They say it’s 30 to 50 years away to produce stabilised fusion plasma energy streams but as we can see as soon as you put something in the plasma it cools down and fusion stops. If they manage to get stable fusion plasma and get 1.5 to 2 units more energy than they put in then it’s going to be another 30 to 50 years to design a power plant to produce electricity so we won’t see the world running on fusion technology in our lifetime and that’s sad. It’s probably another 2 or 3 generations away and that’s a BIG IF. My great niece has just been born and she won’t get to see fusion and that breaks my heart but her kids might toward the end of their life span.
Right, but we got advanced fission reactors instead. Many of the same advantages and MUCH closer to market than fusion. Expect functioning commercial plants before 2030. Molten Salt Reactors and High Temperature gas cooled reactors and Liquid Metal Reactors
@@migBdk yeah we are having SMN (small modular) nuclear reactors that are by far safer then big PW (pressurised water) nuclear reactors. The good thing about them is when they run out of fuel you just plug in a new reactor and dispose of the old one in a repository. You can add as many as you need to and the good thing about them is you can keep them close to cities like 20 plus miles away and this eliminates a lot of electrical seepage and way less resistance due to less cable for the electricity to go through and this means it’s more efficient and cheaper and less energy is needed. The safety is way more safer than huge pressurised water reactors because there’s no coolant to worry about and if there a power cut or an accident man made or natural the control rods are kept open by electromagnets as soon as they loose power the rods drop and stop the reaction, no risk of a melt down, no coolant pumps which are always the cause of a melt down to worry about. There will be a heat exchange with water to convert it into steam for the steam turbine though but not to cool the reactors because they rely only on heat shielding not pumps that can fail and cause a melt down. This is what the U.K. is doing and Rolls Royce has already started building them for testing. I’m not sure if it’s a molten salt or a conventional uranium oxide reactor though.
@@Biketunerfy the Rolls Royce new reactor is a traditional light water cooled uranium reactor, just scaled down. The SMR (Small Modular Reactor) is already a step in the right direction and will bring prices and build times down. Molten Salt Reactors will bring prices way down.
@@migBdk SMRs will be much better technology way safer and cheaper easier to construct and maintain to bring down energy prices. I’m just sad we will never see fusion plants up and running in our lifetime or even crack stabile fusion energy for that matter and my children probably won’t either but their children might but we have to do this, we need clean reliable energy that’s powerful, fusion is that energy to secure our future for our children.
With AI we might see fusion sooner than you think if proven commercially viable it could be driven fast especially if AI helps us with room temperature superconductors
But what if it blows up?
So was it ai or a supercomputer?
You know you can take a 1F capacitor and 1H coil and pulse it at 1V 6.3S and it will give you 20 volts at 20 amps you just have to know where to put the GROUND hit it is not on the NEGATIVE side.
That would be nice, if it were true, but we still need oil and gas for at least thirty years after a REAL breakthrough until the commercial plants are viable.
There are realistic plans for a commercially viable fusion plant by 2025, being built right now
😅😅😅😅😅well information good show you 😅😅
Make a video on quantum generator patent....
my microwave is a "quantum" generator..
how is it unlimited if gas and oil is limited?
Say you are doing something with AI and investors will pay you 10x more.
We need an hourglass ⌛️ shape to turn that doughnut 🍩 shape into a weapon.
Figuring out gots design🤔 only step 50,000 of infinity.
China had a picture of their Fusion Energy machine, a bit smaller than other, it looks as a huge size pressure cooker, with a man holding in hand a thick cable with a plug.
Message, not very 'subliminal', was the Chinese Fusion Reactor is ready to supply power to the grid.
So, What?
Blessings +
It looks like the one from iron man
der reaktor erinnert mich an terminator wo der eine Terminator zurück in die zeit gereißt ist
Where did we obtain the fusion fuel helium-3? It's exceedingly rare on Earth, yet abundant on the lunar surface. All that's required is a fusion reactor. By sending a cargo spacecraft to the Moon and gathering 2 tons of helium-3, the cost would amount to 300 million US dollars per trip for India. With these 2 tons of helium-3, India could generate electricity for the entire country for one year. Interestingly, India's annual electricity earnings amount to $810 billion, so adopting nuclear fusion with helium-3 would lead to savings of $800 billion. This prompts the start of another space race.... India can settle the world bank debt 600 billon dollars in 3 years.
First, how much energy did that moon excursion use. You have to include all the planning, all energy consumed in human actions including costs to get to work and back. If the sum gets close to zero remember that some energy costs have been forgotten.
Helium 3 is not fusion fuel, Deuterium is. Also you would have to scrap off the top meter of the moons surface and process it to extract the Helium-3
The shape of the gas flow path is a Mobius Strip, which has been around for a long time. Not invented by AI.
@@russellk.bonney8534 first he should work on an electric wheelbarrow
Helium 3 is a fusion fuel and the Polywell Fusion is an interesting way of using it
Why not just build a massive barge with large metal arms on land. Waves that come in cause the barge to rise and fall pushing and pulling on the arms which turn the generator.
losses from friction due to weight of the components, sometimes the weight being too much for materials we can cheaply produce, durability of the system when exposed tom the sea (salt spray alone is a bitch).
basically the usual suspects plus sea-specific challenges
Ask ai if it will never turn off.
It crashes still try vsync 😅
no stealator will never work..
What are you thinking.
Will the helium be sold so the children can have helium filled balloons?
No AI have to break governments and private companies for this tech to benefit mankind ... :(
you think we cant use water instead of oil it has been inertial to hide this
Fusion could give everyone free energy
let's be honest, it won't unfold that way, sadly
Hey Tony, the Germans stole your generator
This breakthrough advanced fusion by a decade!
Now it's only 50 years aways. Ha Ha Ha.
Maybe ?
NVIDIA´s NEW AI Chip Breakthrough Changes the Future of AI!
czcams.com/video/Th0nOAKMH-w/video.html
LIGHT FROM THE SUN IS SCATTERED SO THE density of this light is very weak. but if you can create a density using an optic or magnatic or mecanic type of technology you can have a density of light very good for obtaining energy from this light. i propose to create a cone shape from metal with can take this lisght from the sun at ground level and focusing this light in a tiny exit of the cone and you will have this type of static focalizer of light to create energy with out any cost
Or you can use Solar Tower Power Plant.
@@subshadow1 no cost vs costs ..i want a cone
@@subshadow1 next gen of solar panels wii use a cone shaped glass lense to focalise the light an de more efficient but this have, a cost huge one
Fusion is here. Just put solar panels around the Sun…
Okay go ahead.
That's called a Dyson sphere 😂
@@patrickday4206 That damn Dyson figured it out huh?! Went from vacuum cleaners to energy production??
@@u2ooberboober I hope you're kidding
See what you didn't say was how much energy was put into that system to get The 1.3 giga jewels out for 8 MINUTES. If you have to put 100 GIGA JEWELS in just to get 1.3 giga jewels out It's really not worth it. So you're really still 60 years away.
Still with an American-made AI
American is not a real identity as it's a nation made of immigrants.
Energy today, regardless of the type is today as it was during all of the yesterday's; FREE! It's the total intrastructor's which allow's one to utilize it that we pay for, not the energy itself. A gazillion dollar designed, built, etc. etc. etc. Has to be repaid, and those who invested the gazillion's demand a high return on their investment's. One can discover and utilize an engergy type totally free. But then they have to pay various fee's to various government agencies, and or mandated to stop, when the local, city, state, federal code's are not being complied with.
Still neutron emissive and radioactive. I don't think anyone reading this will see fusion harnessed practically and commercially in their lifetimes.
No Codes Were Cracked, kids.... this is just clickbait
It sounds like someone’s funding budget is getting very low. Anyone with a basic idea of Physics will see this could never be over unity when you take in all the system inputs and not just the reaction energy 🤫😶
You are a real physicist.❤
Exiting narratives make da good sci fi story guys.
They don't have a true understanding of physics and their back pocket won't let them listen, any of them, professors included. Long live physics. Bah!
@@russellk.bonney8534source :you made it the fuck up.
Yeah a Dyson sphere would be overunity 😂😂😂
It's possible and it will be done AI should help us make leaps and bounds
🛡️I Do Knowledge Understanding of blueprint of how it looks I vision it .🤓 That More particles from the nuclear fusion . Chain in a DNA 🧬 Highly recommended 🙏🛡️
The headline is total clickbait and nonsense. We will not see fusion energy for decades
Never is the correct word. Physics denies the possibility.
Can it be used for airlines. Military aircraft, space explorations? The aircraft gas is truly the safest propellant that is safe to use tight now. They have to prove it ASAP.
sit tight for another 3 times 40 years
It seems like a giant waste of time and resources when we could be researching simpler means of energy.
6:45 If you believe China's claims... and I don't.
I hope to meet Doremon after 30 years have passed
i feel stupider just listening to this first iter
AI (the way it is today) can only design things according to how it was programmed. So this wont work in real life.
Fusion research is finding out how many ways you can waste millions of dollars 😂
Just support new fission #Thorium 💡
It won't destroy oil all modern technology requires oil as a lubricant, or as a material.
Why spend billions building any of this when you can create real-world virtual simulations to confirm if it will work first?
To simulate something virtually we first need real world data. To collect this data we first need to build real reactors and observe how the plasma reacts with the magnets.
This collected data will be worthwhile for future reactor designs which could be simulated by tapping in different parameters.
Best regards.
@The.Futurist but shouldn't the math take care of that? I thought that is what supercomputers were for, real world simulations, because they can do all that math quickly.
@@tmk6751Computer Models work by reducing complexity otherwise we would quickly run into gigantic computational run times.
And you lose fidelity by reducing complexity.
The Art lies in reducing complexity enough so the calculations do not become excessively costly or time consuming while still giving enough fidelity so the results are actually usefull.
And since we do not have experience with actually usefull Fusion reactors.....it's hard to reduce complexity while still having a usefull model.
@@The.FuturistMy hat's off to you for patiently answering that dumb question.
How do you even miniaturize something that big and powerful?
The magnets alone would be problematic.
How much energy is being put into or the magnets or create the magnetic field?
How strong does the magnetic field have to be to contain the plasma?
If they are getting a net gain of energy wouldn't that imply a self sustaining system?
How did they create and activate the plasma?
Fusion is decades away, if ever. I’ve heard so many recent hype articles that ignore the deeper problems.
Great video well organized and not click bait love it!
and yet another explanation of what fusion is. do you really think you audience doesn't know that already?
Do you have any idea how many breakthroughs there have been that could ruin oil and gas? A LOT. Until the mid 90s (when the project was found out about) there was a branch of the US government which suppressed energy production patents by denying them outright on shady grounds or if they can't buying the patent to lock it up and throw away the key. When the branch was found out about they shut it down... then they made a new branch with a different name and kept on doing the same shady crap- it still happens. It's also creating a fake energy shortage Worldwide. Even if this is real you won't see it being applied in anyone's lifetime who is alive right now. There's too many vested interests in Oil- the only way we change from Oil to something else is by a force of nature which we have no control over, or Oil becomes too expensive to go after. Another reason Oil/Gas isn't going anywhere: anyone can make it in their backyard with anything which burns, you can't do that with fusion.
Not counting for what I already mentioned. The amount of great technology that is suppressed is staggering. We could be living in a Sci-Fi World with Tech that is so advanced that we can't even imagine it as a possibility yet- greed/Money/short-sightedness keep us a Barbarian People though.
It's still really neat, I hope it's real. I hope it works.