The m1 grand French Canadian-born Garand [21] went to work at the United States Army's Springfield Armory and began working on a .30 caliber primer actuated blowback Model 1919 prototype. In 1924, twenty-four rifles, identified as "M1922s" were built at Springfield. At Fort Benning during 1925, they were tested against models by Berthier, Hatcher-Bang, Thompson, and Pedersen, the latter two being delayed blowback types. [22] This led to a further trial of an improved "M1924" Grand against the Thompson, ultimately producing an inconclusive report. [22] As a result, the Ordnance Board ordered a .30-06 Garand variant. In March 1927, the cavalry board reported trials among the Thompson, Garand, and 03 Springfield had not led to a clear winner. This led to a gas-operated .276 (7 mm) model (patented by Garand on April 12, 1930). [22] In early 1928, both the infantry and cavalry boards ran trials with the .276 Pedersen T1 rifle, calling it "highly promising" [22] (despite its use of waxed ammunition, [23] shared by the Thompson). [24] On August 13, 1928, a semiautomatic rifle board (SRB) carried out joint Army, Navy, and Marine Corps trials between the .30 Thompson, both cavalry and infantry versions of the T1 Pedersen, "M1924" Garand, and .256 Bang, and on September 21, the board reported no clear winner. The .30 Garand, however, was dropped in favor of the 276.[25] Further tests by the SRB in July 1929, which included rifle designs by Browning, Colt-Browning, Garand, Holek, Pedersen, Rheinmetall, Thompson, and an incomplete one by White, [n 2] led to a recommendation that work on the (dropped) 30 gas-operated Garand be resumed, and a T1E1 was ordered November 14, 1929. Twenty gas-operated .276 T32 Garands were made and competed with T1 Pedersen rifles in early 1931. The .276 Garand was the clear winner of these trials. The .30 caliber Garand was also tested, in the form of a single T1E1, but was withdrawn with a cracked bolt on October 9, 1931. A January 4, 1932 meeting recommended adoption of the .276 caliber and production of approximately 125 T3E2s. Meanwhile, Grand redesigned his bolt and his improved T12 rifle was retested. The day after the successful conclusion of this test, Army Chief of Staff General Douglas MacArthur personally disapproved any caliber change, in part because there were extensive existing stocks of .30 M1 ball ammunition. [26] On February 25, 1932, Adjutant General John B. Shuman, speaking for the Secretary of War, ordered work on the rifles and ammunition in .276 caliber cease immediately and completely, and all resources be directed toward identification and correction of deficiencies in the Garand .30 caliber. [24] :111 On August 3, 1933, the T12 became the "semi-automatic rifle, caliber 30, M1" [22] In May 1934, 75 M1s went to field trials; 50 went to infantry, 25 to cavalry units. [24]:113 Numerous problems were reported, forcing the rifle to be modified, yet again, before it could be recommended for service and cleared for procurement on November 7, 1935, then standardized January 9, 1936. [22] The first production model was successfully proof-fired, function-fired, and fired for accuracy on July 21, 1937.[27] Production difficulties delayed deliveries to the Army until September 1937. Machine production began at Springfield Armory that month at a rate of ten rifles per day, [28] and reached an output of 100 per day within two years. Despite going into production status, design issues were not at an end. The barrel, gas cylinder, and front sight assembly were redesigned and entered production in early 1940. Existing "gas-trap" rifles were recalled and retrofitted, mirroring problems with the earlier M1903 Springfield rifle that also had to be recalled and reworked approximately three years into production and foreshadowing rework of the M16 rifle at a similar point in its development. Production of the Grand increased in 1940 despite these difficulties, [29] reaching 600 a day by January 10, 1941, [221 and the Army was fully equipped by the end of 1941.[26] Following the outbreak of World War Il in Europe, Winchester was awarded an "educational" production contract for 65,000 rifles, [22] with deliveries beginning in 1943.[22]
Da gibt es von namenhaften Herstellern deutlich bessere Lautsprecher wie die charge 4 für deutlich weniger geld Motion boom oder Motion boom + die spielen beide ne xtreme 3 an die wand und die charge erstrecht
No they arent. The green camo is obviously fake it literally has a facebook logo on it while the other one says jbl. The black one is real because the bass is actually good and the passive radiators move while on the fake they dont move at all
_This comment was deleted by Mark Zuckerberg_
Very original!
@@AudioTribebro pinned his waifu 💀
Lol@@GoofYAhaccount
Bro's comment got deleted by Mark Zuckerberg 💀💀💀💀
@@GoofYAhaccountnahh
Facebook Bluetooth speaker joined the chat
facebook speakers 💀
You see that sideways f
Mom can we have a JBL speaker
No we have a JBL at home
Jbl speaker at home:
Pedi pra mãe 😂😂 compra você mesmo
So funny
nahh you have facebook no need JBL XD
facebook speakers 💀💀💀
Xd
Lol Facebook speaker from ohio
@@TokiFan_987🤓👆🏻
f f
i didnt know facebook made jbls too
Exactly 💯!
Yea
@AudioTribe Exactly dude
@@AudioTribeis that a face book speaker from ohio 💀
I agree with you.
Facebook Bluetooth Speaker Joined the game
facebook charge 3 o i didnt know that facebook made that too!😂
facebook made speakers too?
/
The m1 grand French Canadian-born
Garand [21] went to work at the United States Army's Springfield Armory and began working on a .30 caliber primer actuated blowback Model 1919 prototype. In 1924, twenty-four rifles, identified as "M1922s" were built at Springfield. At Fort Benning during 1925, they were tested against models by Berthier, Hatcher-Bang, Thompson, and Pedersen, the latter two being delayed blowback types. [22] This led to a further trial of an improved "M1924" Grand against the Thompson, ultimately producing an inconclusive report. [22] As a result, the Ordnance Board ordered a .30-06 Garand variant. In March 1927, the cavalry board reported trials among the Thompson, Garand, and 03 Springfield had not led to a clear winner. This led to a gas-operated .276 (7 mm) model (patented by Garand on April
12, 1930). [22]
In early 1928, both
the infantry and cavalry boards ran trials with the .276 Pedersen T1 rifle, calling it "highly promising" [22] (despite its use of waxed ammunition, [23] shared by the Thompson). [24] On August 13, 1928, a semiautomatic rifle board (SRB) carried out joint Army, Navy, and Marine Corps trials between the .30 Thompson, both cavalry and infantry versions of the T1 Pedersen, "M1924" Garand, and .256 Bang, and on September 21, the board reported no clear winner. The .30 Garand, however, was dropped in favor of the 276.[25]
Further tests by the SRB in July 1929, which included rifle designs by Browning, Colt-Browning, Garand, Holek,
Pedersen, Rheinmetall, Thompson, and an incomplete one by White, [n 2] led to a recommendation that work on the (dropped)
30 gas-operated Garand be resumed, and a T1E1 was ordered November 14, 1929.
Twenty gas-operated .276 T32 Garands were made and competed with T1 Pedersen rifles in early 1931. The .276 Garand was the clear winner of these trials. The .30 caliber Garand was also tested, in the form of a single T1E1, but was withdrawn with a cracked bolt on October 9, 1931. A January 4, 1932
meeting recommended adoption of the .276 caliber and production of approximately 125
T3E2s. Meanwhile, Grand redesigned his bolt and his improved T12 rifle was retested.
The day after the successful conclusion of this test, Army Chief of Staff General Douglas MacArthur personally disapproved any caliber change, in part because there were extensive existing stocks of .30 M1 ball ammunition.
[26] On February 25, 1932, Adjutant General John B. Shuman, speaking for the Secretary of War, ordered work on the rifles and ammunition in .276 caliber cease immediately and completely, and all resources be directed toward identification and correction of deficiencies in the Garand .30 caliber. [24] :111
On August 3, 1933, the T12 became the
"semi-automatic rifle, caliber 30, M1" [22] In May 1934, 75 M1s went to field trials; 50 went to infantry, 25 to cavalry units. [24]:113
Numerous problems were reported, forcing the rifle to be modified, yet again, before it could be recommended for service and cleared for procurement on November 7, 1935, then standardized January 9, 1936.
[22] The first production model was successfully proof-fired, function-fired, and fired for accuracy on July 21, 1937.[27]
Production difficulties delayed deliveries to the Army until September 1937. Machine production began at Springfield Armory that month at a rate of ten rifles per day, [28] and reached an output of 100 per day within two years. Despite going into production status, design issues were not at an end. The barrel, gas cylinder, and front sight assembly were redesigned and entered production in early
1940. Existing "gas-trap" rifles were recalled and retrofitted, mirroring problems with the earlier M1903 Springfield rifle that also had to be recalled and reworked approximately three years into production and foreshadowing rework of the M16 rifle at a similar point in its development. Production of the Grand increased in 1940 despite these difficulties,
[29] reaching 600 a day by January 10, 1941, [221 and the Army was fully equipped by the end of 1941.[26] Following the outbreak of World War Il in Europe, Winchester was awarded an "educational" production contract for 65,000 rifles, [22] with deliveries beginning in 1943.[22]
The fake one actually sounds half decent.
Yes, but it doesn't worth it! Cheers
@@AudioTribe I mean, if I were to buy that for around $15-$20, there are certainly worse speakers for that price.
@@Techlifeandmorejbl go 2 is better for the price
@@dragicatodorovska6567 Dude, whatever you're on, I want some of it. That speaker is terrible.
@@Techlifeandmore at least it's better than this fucking fake Facebook shit
iPad speakers are way better than the fake
T&g has been silent since the jbl flip 6 dropped
= T&G TG298
Which is fake which is real
The army stile is fake
This one na Facebook. 😂😂
Can you play ric flair drip on the fake one
Those passive radiators are disgusting
Uff the difference is like day and night❤
У пальной колонки даже пассивки не шалахнулись НА МАКСИМАЛЬНОЙ ГРОМКОСТИ
the fake jbl looks like FACEBOOKL
because the f on the front
Who tf would fall for this, it just copied the concept of a charge 3, but copied it terribly
Yes, it is a cheap clone!
My cousin fell for it she went to a Walmart store
I have the flip version of the discount
How do I delete the inicialization sound from the fake speaker ?
FaceBL Charge 3😂😂
Amigo, quanto que foi a original?
Hello, which one?
@@AudioTribe original
i think f stands for fake
El falso salió sacudido 😂
brutal diferencia locooo
Can you do a grill off test
bro witch one is real or fake
Hi. The navy is fake!
Camo
does f stand for fake on the fake one
For Facebook- LOL
@@AudioTribe lol
My dremns is Jbl 😢
jbl charge 5 red good ❤️❤️
F for F A K E
Думаю с права орига
Слева ориг
Song?
Mortals
Link for the fake one?
Bro have facebook logo💀💀💀💀💀☠️
Yes - new release! LoL
Se nota el bajo en el original 😅
But it is still good the f
I can hear the difference! The fake speaker has a different connect sound, but the real one has the actual sound!
Facebook 💀
JBL charge 4 original top 🔝
Pega radio?
Almoust! 🫣
soung name
Warriyo - Mortals
wOw A fAcEbOoK sPeAkEr
Can I have a black jbl Bluetooth speaker please😢❤
Knock 👏 off 👏
Not a fake
How much
Not the same real time
Pls you Jbl battery is moveing I can tell
Wait Who fake JBL?????
Facebook speaker in Ohio 😂
🔊 fbl speaker! 😂
Omg jbl extreme 3
Love jbl f
Face book page 3
Розберіть Леон 2 колонки оригинальную JBL і китайську JBL
片方偽物JBLですやんか
I just bought a fake , feeling bad 😔😔😔
Don't buy FAKE speakers - they don't worth it. Cheers
@@AudioTribe Don’t worry, I’ve learned my lesson and won’t be fooled again. 👌
Sim
Get the real thing!
FBL speaker 😂🔊🤣
Cuz we ned ton f jbl f to buy some
-oi oi-
Тут о ходе пасивок говорить неочем
99+
F in Chat lol
Da gibt es von namenhaften Herstellern deutlich bessere Lautsprecher wie die charge 4 für deutlich weniger geld
Motion boom oder Motion boom + die spielen beide ne xtreme 3 an die wand und die charge erstrecht
CLARO , CUANDO NO PUEDES PAGAR UN JBL XTREME 3
@@ramonlozano87 english pls
Get out of the text of the text of the text of the text jbl
කියද ගන
JBL lui casse le q 😊😊😊😊😊
Gf
Go go 🤣🤣🏋️
facebook speaker in ohio 💀
f for f a c e b o o k
Both are fake bro 😂😂
No they arent. The green camo is obviously fake it literally has a facebook logo on it while the other one says jbl. The black one is real because the bass is actually good and the passive radiators move while on the fake they dont move at all
Za blughtootch devaish ish rieedi to pæ
Qoyil
b9adeh n7ib nichri
Ambos son fake
Ride fake
f-fake??😂
F - Facebook 🤣
Song? @audioTribe
Mortals by warriyo