@@imicz6409 yes, also later version equipped the 57mm caliber were capable to penetrate panther cheeks as long as the panther is >100mm from the cromwell
@@achmadikmal8372 the 57mm (6pdr guns) for Overlord and later, were equipped for APDS rounds. If you are war thunder player, none of british tanks have them..... Why? Who knows, maybe because they could be far superior than t-34-57
German shells have explosive filler in em. IDK if it has that function here. The moment the gun breach was damaged, the cromwell was no longer operable.
APCR exist (but i doubt germans use them extensively) and when the military came up with APHE , they tested it and realize that the explosive filler doesnt really improve damage a whole lot
I wonder how he does the shot placement on these. Last video I saw was a Kingtiger (If memory serves) vs a Pershing. Pershing got hit in the turret ring almost immediately, meanwhile the King Tiger bounced multiple hits to its frontal armor from that 90mm gun.
Commander: Open fire gunner! Gunner: on its way! D I N G Commander: Well bugger, driver, reverse! Driver: Its a British tank sir, we don't have a reverse! Then the long barrel 75 promptly tears the Cromwell to pieces
@@bertiemascaro2385 Allied tank losses OVERALL: Approximately 10,000 in total en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equipment_losses_in_World_War_II#:~:text=From%20June%206%2C%201944%20through,M10%20tank%20destroyers%2C%20217%20M18 US armor losses: 13% to direct rocket AT weaponry 11% to unknown reasons (logistic failures, breakdowns, MIA) 18% to mines and other defensive explosives 58% to direct fire such as vehicles and anti tank guns Out of those, the crew casualty ratio was on average 18.25% Meaning out of a crew of 5, 1 on average would die or be injured in the case of the tank being destroyed. Enemy vehicles & AT weapons wouldn't even be the leading cause of crew casualties by percentage, it would be rocket AT weapons like the panzerfaust & Panzerschreck. According a 12th Army Group report quoted in "Armoured Thunderbolt" by Stephen Zaloga US tank casualities averaged 1 killed and 1 wounded when a Sherman was knocked out. A US 1st Army study found that of tank crew casualities, the ratio was roughly one quarter were killed to three-quarters wounded. www.dupuyinstitute.org/blog/2016/08/26/u-s-tank-losses-and-crew-casualties-in-world-war-ii/ German armor losses in the Western front: Approximately 10,000 JUST on the western front www.amazon.com/German-Armour-Western-Front-Images/dp/1473868521 The book goes into detail about why there were so many, mostly due to practically nonexistant maintenance, untrained crews, and many flaws in the overall design. Eyewitness accounts from Canadian Sherman crews at the battle of Norrey-en-Bessin stated that they had no problems destroying Panther tanks. Similarly for the US, at the Battle of Arracourt in September 1944 where a force of 75 Panzer IVs, 107 Panthers and 80 StuGs attacked a smaller force primarily composed of US Army Sherman tanks (the basic version with the 75mm gun), taking advantage of terrible weather that grounded Allied air support. After 11 days of fighting the US had lost 25 tanks and 7 tank destroyers, but the Germans had suffered 86 tanks destroyed and 114 damaged. In total, the study recorded a total of 30 tank-vs-tank engagements fought between M4 Shermans and the Mk V Panther. Astonishingly, contrary to all the popular notions of Sherman tank inferiority, these two Divisions in fact recorded a 3.6-1 kill ratio in their favour against Panthers.
![Realistic Tank Destruction Battles in Teardown [TABS] || The Trenchlines #1 || Realistic Tank Combat](/img/n.gif)
cromwell penetrated through a panthers turret💀
It is possible, though one may require a precise aim
@@14thbkrctsecks via a shot trap, right?
@@imicz6409 yes, also later version equipped the 57mm caliber were capable to penetrate panther cheeks as long as the panther is >100mm from the cromwell
@@14thbkrctsecks Thanks for the info 👍
@@achmadikmal8372 the 57mm (6pdr guns) for Overlord and later, were equipped for APDS rounds. If you are war thunder player, none of british tanks have them..... Why? Who knows, maybe because they could be far superior than t-34-57
German shells have explosive filler in em. IDK if it has that function here. The moment the gun breach was damaged, the cromwell was no longer operable.
APCR exist (but i doubt germans use them extensively) and when the military came up with APHE , they tested it and realize that the explosive filler doesnt really improve damage a whole lot
@@kek621k shrapnel rounds were much more effective then one's with explosive filler when it came to disabling the crew and tank
@@orangesel9338 122mm would like to have a conversation with you
@@LaVaZ000 won't have the fuel to even reach me
APHE wasn’t very effective, so they mainly stuck with standard AP rounds and APCR.
Yoo nice vid hope you got 1k subs
Mk shooted 2 shoots in the end
oops
@@_kether_ redo it
@@tank4841 bro mad
@@_kether_ yes redo it that wasnt fair. most tank videos are like "make good guy win no bad guy"
"shooted 2 shoots" 💀
Nice vid
I wonder how he does the shot placement on these. Last video I saw was a Kingtiger (If memory serves) vs a Pershing. Pershing got hit in the turret ring almost immediately, meanwhile the King Tiger bounced multiple hits to its frontal armor from that 90mm gun.
Panther 1 shots Cromwell, end of video💥
Commander: Open fire gunner!
Gunner: on its way!
D I N G
Commander: Well bugger, driver, reverse!
Driver: Its a British tank sir, we don't have a reverse!
Then the long barrel 75 promptly tears the Cromwell to pieces
Panther would've destroyed the Cromwell before it would've even spotted it.
ah yes, tanks sitting complely still, unabls to turn or move in any direction but forward or backward, with turrets that also do not move.
Comment under mine lmao shooted two shots 🤣
Wow, since when does a Cromwell gun pen a panther??
6-pdr has just enough power to penetrate Panther's mantlet, especially when using APDS shots introduced in 1944.
How did a fricking trash tank win
Blödsinn
Кромвель пробил пантеру в влд 💀
@@DarkLine844 ты пишешь шведу на русском?
is`t game or something?
Yes its a game People Playground
Wtf this is totally brit bias
⁸
german tanks are the best in the war, not the shit of the england
Shut up wehraboo
Yes german tanks were so good that they had statistically higher losses compared to the UK and US
@@aletron4750 what are your sources ?
@@bertiemascaro2385 Allied tank losses OVERALL: Approximately 10,000 in total
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equipment_losses_in_World_War_II#:~:text=From%20June%206%2C%201944%20through,M10%20tank%20destroyers%2C%20217%20M18
US armor losses:
13% to direct rocket AT weaponry
11% to unknown reasons (logistic failures, breakdowns, MIA)
18% to mines and other defensive explosives
58% to direct fire such as vehicles and anti tank guns
Out of those, the crew casualty ratio was on average 18.25%
Meaning out of a crew of 5, 1 on average would die or be injured in the case of the tank being destroyed.
Enemy vehicles & AT weapons wouldn't even be the leading cause of crew casualties by percentage, it would be rocket AT weapons like the panzerfaust & Panzerschreck.
According a 12th Army Group report quoted in "Armoured Thunderbolt" by Stephen Zaloga US tank casualities averaged 1 killed and 1 wounded when a Sherman was knocked out. A US 1st Army study found that of tank crew casualities, the ratio was roughly one quarter were killed to three-quarters wounded.
www.dupuyinstitute.org/blog/2016/08/26/u-s-tank-losses-and-crew-casualties-in-world-war-ii/
German armor losses in the Western front: Approximately 10,000 JUST on the western front www.amazon.com/German-Armour-Western-Front-Images/dp/1473868521
The book goes into detail about why there were so many, mostly due to practically nonexistant maintenance, untrained crews, and many flaws in the overall design.
Eyewitness accounts from Canadian Sherman crews at the battle of Norrey-en-Bessin
stated that they had no problems destroying Panther tanks. Similarly for the US, at the Battle of Arracourt in September 1944 where a force of 75 Panzer IVs, 107 Panthers and 80 StuGs attacked a smaller force primarily composed of US Army Sherman tanks (the basic version with the 75mm gun), taking advantage of terrible weather that grounded Allied air support. After 11 days of fighting the US had lost 25 tanks and 7 tank destroyers, but the Germans had suffered 86 tanks destroyed and 114 damaged.
In total, the study recorded a total of 30 tank-vs-tank engagements fought between M4 Shermans and the Mk V Panther. Astonishingly, contrary to all the popular notions of Sherman tank inferiority, these two Divisions in fact recorded a 3.6-1 kill ratio in their favour against Panthers.
damn thats crazy who won
"Hope You Evolve your Brain One day"