Approach Plate Minima (Minimums) Section

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 8. 09. 2024
  • ** Visit www.klaviation.com for even more great content! **
    *NOTE: While talking about the LDA 19 Approach I mistakenly mentioned reduced ceiling requirements. I should have said that the MDA is lowered from 880ft to 480ft.*
    The minima section of the instrument approach chart gives the pilot the complete set of descent minimums and visibility criteria for the procedure to be flown. The information provided includes all minimum altitudes for the approach, minimum visibility required to start the approach, heights above touchdown, and heights above the airport. Depending on the type of approach there can be many different minimums on just one chart. Some GPS approaches have 4 different sets of minimums depending on the capabilities of your GPS receiver. Some non-precision approaches have multiple minimums based on your ability to fix an intersection along the approach path.
    Let's take a deeper look at all those numbers.

Komentáře • 124

  • @Franjaver
    @Franjaver Před 9 lety +55

    By the way, I love the way he talk, slowly and clear, for foreign people studying here is perfect (like me).
    Thanks for the videos!

    • @dantellewisham133
      @dantellewisham133 Před 4 lety +1

      I was thinking....His diction is Cat A 😂😎😉😄😆😎😆

  • @tonyfdesign
    @tonyfdesign Před 10 lety +9

    Passed my instrument checkride! Your videos were very helpful and I've been recommending them to other students too! Thanks, Tony Fletcher

  • @Klaviation
    @Klaviation  Před 11 lety +7

    That is correct. The minimums in parenthesis are there specifically for military pilots to derive their alternate information from. The numbers in parenthesis refer to AGL values so they can be an excellent source of additional information but are definitely not "true" minimums (even for the military guys).

    • @michaelconvery8871
      @michaelconvery8871 Před 2 lety +1

      Hi Will. You stated that DH for the ILS is the minimum altitude you can fly to for that approach. Was that a mixup? I always understood that MDA was a minimum height that cannot be broken until satisfied with visual requirements and that DA or DH was just a decision altitude. Am I mistaken in my understanding? Thanks

  • @mikeambacher
    @mikeambacher Před 2 lety +5

    Thanks for the great video, minor comments:
    @2:25 you mention 480 as ‘minimum decision height’ however it is not a height it is an altitude called ‘DA’ (decision altitude)
    Also it is important to note the figures in parenthesis are for military use, not civilian use.
    Thanks for your work

  • @DrFillyBlunt
    @DrFillyBlunt Před 3 lety +1

    Hard to find information that explains these charts in detail. Thanks, I was needing this.

  • @Klaviation
    @Klaviation  Před 11 lety +2

    Thanks for finding that! I find myself flying mainly in the Part 121 world where that is the rule. I sometimes have a little crossover when I start talking rules and regulations. You are definitely correct that under part 91 you can fly the approach you just can't land unless you meet the requirements of 91.175

  • @codywillemarck699
    @codywillemarck699 Před 11 lety +2

    I found in my instrument oral exam guide that any minimums found in parentheses are NA to civil pilots. Those minimums are directed at military pilots who should refer to appropriate regulations.

  • @ajthuenemann1617
    @ajthuenemann1617 Před 3 lety +3

    The numbers in the parentheses are for military pilot, and "not applicable to civil pilots"
    PLEASE REFERANCE THE TERMINAL PROCEDURES SUPPLEMENT!

  • @bugnut82
    @bugnut82 Před 9 lety +10

    @3:40. Per part 91 you are allowed to start the approach, however the weather must be at or above the approach minimums to continue to land.

    • @johnscarry6112
      @johnscarry6112 Před 7 lety +1

      "weather must be at or above the approach minimums" as viewed from the cockpit, not as reported by the ground. e.g The visibility in the tower is not necessarily the same as the visibility at the approach end of the runway-it could be better or worse.

    • @SpaceForceRecon
      @SpaceForceRecon Před 6 lety +1

      91.175 (c)(2) “...flight visibility...”

  • @rishic7310
    @rishic7310 Před 2 lety

    Very good presentation!!

  • @Klaviation
    @Klaviation  Před 11 lety +2

    Thank you for your support

  • @-maxipoo-
    @-maxipoo- Před 2 lety

    Amazing video, I finally understand this part of the plate. Thanks!

  • @wandashibanda7612
    @wandashibanda7612 Před 2 měsíci

    Great explanation!

  • @walmart531
    @walmart531 Před rokem

    Thank you so much for these videos

  • @noonelimit
    @noonelimit Před 10 lety +3

    Clear and precise explanation !

  • @ilankrt
    @ilankrt Před 2 lety

    Great tutorial, clear speaking and very good visual explanation! Many thanks

  • @sebu6395
    @sebu6395 Před 10 lety +3

    During the discussion of the different values presented in the IFR landing minima block, it was stated that the values in parenthesis after the barometric altitude (DH or MDA) and visibility necessary to initiate the approach are an Above Ground Level (AGL) height of the ceiling, rounded to the nearest 100 feet above the touchdown zone of the runway. This is incorrect. The values inside the parenthesis are "Ceiling in feet & Prevailing Visibility in SM" requirements for planning purposes, and/or required weather minimums (command regulation dependent) for Department of Defense (i.e., military) aircraft and DOES NOT apply to civilians flying the approach whatsoever. A full description of every symbol used on IFR plates are located at the front of the approach booklet if you'd like to verify this information for yourself. An excellent discussion on the approach minima block otherwise.

  • @guelo757
    @guelo757 Před 5 lety +3

    I listened to the entire video because it has great information. But the voice was making me want to go to a nursing home and steal icecream from veterans.

  • @tywheeler7131
    @tywheeler7131 Před 2 lety

    Brilliantly succinct and valuable… thank you!

  • @Brian-ff7tw
    @Brian-ff7tw Před 8 lety

    Awesome video, very informative! Also It feels like Mr. Rogers is explaining these approach plates.

  • @Nephastion22
    @Nephastion22 Před 3 lety

    Excellent teaching and video. Many thanks!

  • @edsonrocha6268
    @edsonrocha6268 Před 5 lety

    AWESOME !
    Crucial Information !
    Mainly Regarding Ceiling and Visibility Minimum !
    Many Thanks !
    Best Regards.
    Ed
    São Paulo
    🇧🇷

  • @ashleyvalentin3210
    @ashleyvalentin3210 Před 5 lety

    I really appreciate these quick lessons!

  • @eugenefinogenov4494
    @eugenefinogenov4494 Před 9 lety +35

    there is mistake value in parentheses is DH/MDA and visibility for military aircraft not AGL height

    • @tsrhall87
      @tsrhall87 Před 7 lety +1

      This is military planning minimums.

    • @StefBelgium
      @StefBelgium Před 5 lety +2

      Agree. He said 480 ft is the DH where actually this is the DA. The small numbers is the DH and in brackets the mil operations.

  • @apbeers
    @apbeers Před 4 lety

    Great video

  • @RK-de5wg
    @RK-de5wg Před 4 lety

    Great video! You cleared a couple things up for me!

  • @mybubu2000
    @mybubu2000 Před 6 lety

    This is so calming

  • @mdot633
    @mdot633 Před 7 lety

    Fantastic refresher, thank you

  • @seanstone2980
    @seanstone2980 Před 5 lety

    AMAZING tutorials. Thanks for all the help!

  • @pilot_micah
    @pilot_micah Před 4 lety

    In instrument training right now, good video!

  • @alejandroroldan7321
    @alejandroroldan7321 Před 9 lety

    THANKS FOR YOUR USEFUL INFORMATION. GREAT JOB

  • @Klaviation
    @Klaviation  Před 11 lety

    Thanks for the praise

  • @podcastbunker
    @podcastbunker Před 5 lety

    Thanks Mr. Rogers

  • @pilotsahan7419
    @pilotsahan7419 Před 3 lety

    Slow and low. So easy to understand.

  • @Gebreye87
    @Gebreye87 Před 6 lety

    The best way for me to understand Thank you!!

  • @storyofwill
    @storyofwill Před 6 lety +2

    Thanks for the video. But can you please do one video specifically on RVR? I can’t find good clear explanation on the Internet. RVR and visibility, they are not exactly the same thing. RVR is horizontal visual range, not a slant range. How do you use the reported RVR exactly? Thank you!

  • @fernandoql5983
    @fernandoql5983 Před 8 lety

    Great explanation thanks!!

  • @TheNYgolfer
    @TheNYgolfer Před 11 lety +1

    Nice video but just one point of clarification.Under part 91 you can shoot an approach if visibility is less than the published minimum.

  • @SpaceForceRecon
    @SpaceForceRecon Před 6 lety +8

    You’re wrong about visibility at 3:40. You may conduct the approach if the reported visibility is less than reported. As per 91.175 (c)(2)
    “The flight visibility is not less than the visibility prescribed in the standard instrument approach being used;”
    and..
    1.1 Flight visibility means the average forward horizontal distance, from the cockpit of an aircraft in flight, at which prominent unlighted objects may be seen and identified by day and prominent lighted objects may be seen and identified by night.
    Visibility is also not the only limiting factor on whether you can land or not. It’s the acronym VAN from 91.175 (c)

    • @noonelimits
      @noonelimits Před 5 lety

      if the reported visibility is NOT less than reported. As per 91.175 (c)(2)

  • @KaisTheFireWarrior
    @KaisTheFireWarrior Před 8 lety

    thank you for this video, it greatly helped me

  • @stefansmuts8882
    @stefansmuts8882 Před 6 lety

    Awesome video man!

  • @rotorit22
    @rotorit22 Před 4 lety

    well done. thank you sir!!

  • @tonyfdesign
    @tonyfdesign Před 11 lety

    These are great. Thank you.

  • @Klaviation
    @Klaviation  Před 11 lety +1

    Thanks for the feeback!

  • @abbieamavi
    @abbieamavi Před 5 lety +1

    *GREAT lesson, had to put sped on 2x but perfect review before taking my IFR written exam tomorrow! thank you and happy MLK day!* :)

  • @dantellewisham133
    @dantellewisham133 Před 4 lety +1

    Love the voice, is it just me or do you hear a bit of Tine Belcher (Bob's Burgers) here?

  • @unclealig
    @unclealig Před 3 lety

    extensive video. but where is the RA( radio alt)?

  • @codywillemarck699
    @codywillemarck699 Před 11 lety

    Cool. By the way awesome videos. Keep up the good work!

  • @ahmedgremeda2529
    @ahmedgremeda2529 Před 11 lety

    very good work
    thank you

  • @dalehersh296
    @dalehersh296 Před 8 lety

    You call the 480" for the S-ILS a "Decision Height", but I think it is a DA, decision altitude flown off your altimeter. Heights need a radio altimeter, like on CAT-II approaches.

    • @arnoudnoordover
      @arnoudnoordover Před 8 lety

      I agree, the 480 = DA

    • @philjohnson8373
      @philjohnson8373 Před 6 lety

      In my King material it's referred to by both Decision Height and Decision Altitude - I think one is more current than the other, but they both reference the point on a precision approach where you decide to go missed or land.

  • @alostplayerr
    @alostplayerr Před 6 lety

    Thank you very much sir

  • @AirspeedisLife
    @AirspeedisLife Před 7 měsíci

    10:58 how is the “rounding” to the nearest hundred works? , in that plate it rounded less than what the HAT was, sometimes it round up or down, why is that

  • @serhatgun01
    @serhatgun01 Před 7 lety +1

    Thanks, could you also comment on horizontal limits for MEA, MOCA AND MORA ..

  • @goiyeaglua40
    @goiyeaglua40 Před 5 lety

    Thank you

  • @stealhty1
    @stealhty1 Před 11 lety

    great video,however I may have to double check this video before attempt any ILS approach

  • @CactusBravo42
    @CactusBravo42 Před 2 lety

    So if doesn’t say MDH(A) in the S-ILS box, that first number is always the DH?

  • @JeremyAverett
    @JeremyAverett Před 9 lety

    Excellent.

  • @amrewais
    @amrewais Před 8 lety

    Thank you very much i benefited from it very much
    but i don't understand LN AV-LVNAV-LPV when is GPS Approach used ?

  • @faaacademyairportcertifica5155

    TO DO THE BME APPROACH TYPE BME:ILS THEN TO LAND RUNWAY 10? THE COLON IS HOW YOU PICK UP TWO FREQUENCIES?

  • @Menonutube
    @Menonutube Před 9 lety

    @ 9:16 mark you say - "depending on whether 'you can fix' the GAUER intersection". I know what a fix is but what do you mean by 'you can fix'? Do you mean to say if I can add GAUER to the FMC? Can you elaborate?

  • @faaacademyairportcertifica5155

    TO CHECK ALT MINIMUMS IN AAISA GOT TO AIRPORT DATA-AIRPORT DATA?

  • @JCA11
    @JCA11 Před 4 lety

    im new at this, i fly the sim x-plane. ILS 10R approach, so i set the radio minimum to 287 for the minimum callout? and baro 480?

  • @faaacademyairportcertifica5155

    THE THE SRS IS THE AIR TRAFFIC TRANSMITTER?

  • @faaacademyairportcertifica5155

    TO DO THE ILS APPROACH PLATE YOU TYPE ILS IF YOU TRUST THE LOC? THEN TO LAND RUNWAY 10? AFTER CLEARANCE?

  • @PilotCristina
    @PilotCristina Před 6 lety

    Thanks!

  •  Před 4 lety

    when doing LNAV/VNAV, is the VNAV component always baro ? always GPS ?

  • @nyleluke
    @nyleluke Před 2 lety

    (for Military Aviation Use)

  • @faaacademyairportcertifica5155

    THE BOXES ON THE COLOR AIRPORT DATA APROACH CHART IS THE ALTITUDE AND GLIDESCOPE.

  • @podcastbunker
    @podcastbunker Před 5 lety

    It’s like the drone of the history teacher on the Wonder years. 💤

  • @faaacademyairportcertifica5155

    HOW YOU TYPE THE APPROACH IS DME:ILS.

  • @gingerhuntwipf5088
    @gingerhuntwipf5088 Před 6 lety +7

    That is wrong man what's in parentheses apples to military aircraft only

  • @JazzarGK
    @JazzarGK Před 8 lety

    so say i was on an approach. Would that 480 ft be above runway level, or above sea level (Radio or Barometer)

  • @tonyfdesign
    @tonyfdesign Před 10 lety

    So why would Mc Carran's parallel runways have different viz minimums?

    • @Klaviation
      @Klaviation  Před 10 lety +2

      When they survey the approach and create the procedure a complex system is used to determine minimums based on the obstacles in the area. It could be that some obstacle encroaches a little too close on one runway but is just outside the protected area for the other. This could be on the approach or missed approach as well.

  • @faaacademyairportcertifica5155

    HOW YOU DO THE NEXT APPROACH IS DME:GPS.

  • @Franjaver
    @Franjaver Před 9 lety

    I have a question, Always confuse with DA, DH ..
    which one is for which approach?
    And which one is AGL and MSL?
    I read somewhere that "Height" is always AGL.
    DA and DH are for Precision Approaches.
    But .. DA= MSL and DH = AGL?
    MDA is for Non-Precision App MSL?
    MDH is for Non-Precision App AGL?
    In the example of the video, can anyone write the data from any number? Like:
    S-ILS 480 (DA=MSL) 287 (HAT= AGL) ...
    something like that.
    Thanks

    • @alejandroroldan7321
      @alejandroroldan7321 Před 9 lety +1

      +Franjaver Ariza DA(decision altitude)= PRECISION APP AND IT IS BASED ON MSL, AND YOUR ALTIMETER. AND DH(decision height) IS USED IN PRECISION APP AS WELL. AND BASED ON HEIGHT ABOVE TDZ. AND YOUR RADIOALTIMETER. FOR MDA AND MDH APPLY THE SAME THE ONLY DIFFERENCE IS THAT THEY ARE USED IN NON-PRECISION APP. HOPE YOU GOT IT

  •  Před 4 lety

    480 is thus a DA (not DH)

  • @faaacademyairportcertifica5155

    IN 2006 THE PRIVATE, OR PERSONAL, AIRCRAFT USED LORAN-C

  • @DeeplyRooted07
    @DeeplyRooted07 Před 9 lety

    5:58 What exactly does the 24 means?

    • @alejandroroldan7321
      @alejandroroldan7321 Před 9 lety +1

      +The Aviator the 24 means the RVR(runway visual range) value, and it is used to determinated the lowest visibility you are required to have on this type of approach. 24= 1/2 statue mile

  • @tr1x420
    @tr1x420 Před 8 lety

    thank yyou\

  • @tullywacker
    @tullywacker Před 2 lety

    you keep referencing DH when its actually DA...

  • @andy347
    @andy347 Před 6 lety +1

    The higher numbers for higher categories are not for "reaction times" but because of bigger turn radii and therefore different obstacle clearance requirements. See AIM Fig 5-4-30. Also the weather mins in parenthesis are for military only. You really shouldn't be producing these videos until you know the subject matter better.

  • @tuanminhnguyen512
    @tuanminhnguyen512 Před 6 lety

    DA/DH

  • @gingerhuntwipf5088
    @gingerhuntwipf5088 Před 6 lety

    Other then that it's a great video

  • @faaacademyairportcertifica5155

    THE LAST CLASS WAS PRA ILS

  • @faaacademyairportcertifica5155

    I MEAN LORAN C WORKS THROUGH ENR-RIGHT

  • @faaacademyairportcertifica5155

    BOY DREAMS, DREAMS

  • @faaacademyairportcertifica5155

    I WONDER WHICH CLASS I TOOK IN MY OTHER DEGREE?

  • @faaacademyairportcertifica5155

    WELL WHAT DO YOU CALL VOR? OMNI DIRECTION OF VOR(MON)? BOTH

  • @mikestretanski3826
    @mikestretanski3826 Před 7 lety

    again, nice "bite-sized" lesson

  • @faaacademyairportcertifica5155

    GOOD TIMES-LIFE 's BEEN GOOD? FEATURED ON MOST MUSIC PLAYERS

  • @faaacademyairportcertifica5155

    INSIDE SOLIDE BLUE IS MILITARY INSTRUCTION WAIVER EXPIRES.

  • @faaacademyairportcertifica5155

    YEAR 2018

  • @faaacademyairportcertifica5155

    FAA2700

  • @faaacademyairportcertifica5155

    WELL THE VELOCITY OF A CAR IS IN M/HR

  • @faaacademyairportcertifica5155

    OR CLASS E AIRSPACE

  • @faaacademyairportcertifica5155

    IF THERE IS AN EMERGANCY

  • @faaacademyairportcertifica5155

    OKAY ROGER BILL HUMPHRIES

  • @faaacademyairportcertifica5155

    BECAUE THE MAGENTA LINE IN THE AIRPORT DATA CHART

  • @faaacademyairportcertifica5155

    COMMERCIAL PUBLIC ACCESS AIRPORTS ARE NOT THE STATE AIRPORT.