The 2 people men who won the Nobel prize are not just 2 old white men. Very rude, considering the amount of work and sacrifice those two must’ve made to earn that prize. Content of character my friend, content of character.
I just don't see why he mentioned that. It just didn't seem appropriate. It seemed racist. Is the fact that white males have contributed greatly to science, math, etc. a mark against them? If so, then what about the NBA? Is it wrong that it is dominated by black males? What does James say when he watches an NBA game and sees the starting lineup - "five black males?" The "white males" he referred to were brilliant. There's a wave of feeling today that white male = bad, all others = noble beings suppressed by white males.
universe is everything, then what is outside of it? This is a question that has been asked for centuries, and even today, we don't have a definitive answer. But as this video shows, the universe is not just a static, unchanging entity. It's expanding and evolving, and we're just starting to scratch the surface of understanding its mysteries. Melody, the narrator's childhood friend, was unafraid to ask the big questions, and it's that kind of curiosity and willingness to explore that has driven us to make so many incredible discoveries about the universe. Who knows what we'll uncover next
Didn't like his reference to two white guys winning the nobel prize with a snide remark and then his mention of priviledge and his apparent woke ideology. This was not necessary in an otherwise good talk. He should just stick to science.
Bosons are named after particles discovered by Indian Scientist Dr. Bose but nobody seems to mention his name when talking about HiggsBosons . It is always about the British , Dr Higgs including when awarding Nobel prize.
@@truthsayer5824 @Sheng-Jin Zhou The word ‘boson’ was named for S.N. Bose not because he discovered bosons. It was named so by Paul Dirac, a Nobel Prize winning physicist, to honour Bose’s contribution to the Bose-Einstein statistics, work he did with Albert Einstein on defining the general properties of all bosons. S.N. Bose - great man, great contribution, but he has nothing to do with the Higgs boson in particular, except that this particle is a boson. What’s being celebrated about the Higgs is not being done in denial of Bose’s contributions because there is nothing to deny. The physics behind what's going on now has more to do with how the hunt for one particular boson is shaping modern particle physics.
James sir, you are an incredible lecturer, and educator. You make your lecturing come alive! Your articulating and the knack of making extremely complicated science classes, understandable to thick empty headed people like me, is a gift! You are special, my friend!! Thanks for educating me in the workings of the Universe! 😊
in college, I took a black holes, relativity and cosmology course.. and asked my professor this very question.. what was outside the edge.. He laughed it off and said I was stupid for asking it and no idea what I was talking about. If this guy had been my professor.. I would have gotten an A in that course.. he explained it in 30 seconds.. even if it is just a theory because we really don't know.. it satisfies that question.
how can there Be an edge , when everything moves away from each other every galaxy is moving away from every other galaxy at the speed of light ... trust me , there's No edge or we would see waves coming back in the background radiation picture there isn't a center Because there is no edge , when you get That statement , you'll get the point
@@ThermaL-ty7bw back then and now.. I didn't come up with the idea of the "edge" I just asked if there was an edge, what would be beyond it.. so you're response isn't needed.. yet again youtube strikes!
I don't why he suddenly pivoted to completely abstract discussion of life's existence with picking up the tablet and just reading off the script. Until then I was totally immersed in his lecture.
Yeah him suddenly holding and reading off the tablet was odd and shows he didnt fully prepare for this lecture. The whole portion of him reading off about how all electrons are the same and they are just part of the electron field not tobe viewed as individual entities was strange as well. I can rattle that off without having to read it off a screen.
I notice that too, I was engaged till he start reading from that tablet. But in my mind I totally understand that. I guess he wanted to choose his words carefully especially when it meant a lot more philosophy and in morality. Look how he get back to the tablet at 44:40 It seems obviously he is avoiding any misconception might be taking out of context.
@@C.D.J.Burton I was enjoying the video until I heard him say those words. Its a shame. I had to rewind the youtube video because I was suprised tbh. For someone in His position to revert to that is shocking espeshialy when science itslef should be represented regardless of skin colour. I was about to share His video on social media but after that statement he made I am declining.
Everybody should just watch the videos about the double split experiment to vaguely understand what quantum physics is trying to deal with. And then watch a video on Entanglement and your head will just explode.
Particle physics is a psyop, I great man said "if you want to find the secrets of the universe you need to think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration"
One of the most compelling words ever spoken that i have ever encountered. In the scheme of our universe our mother Earth is so insignificant, too small to be even noticed and we think we are big and mighty. we are not. What does it take for us humans to realise this Fact.
Earth is special and it is insignificant. It can be both things at the same time. Life may only exist on Earth out of the whole universe. But then again life may be abundant across the universe. But then again the universe is so big contact between life forms across the universe may be impossible. So we may be in effect alone.
@@redmed10 Exactly what I thought. We maybe alone. We maybe not. But we are effectively alone, 100%. Unless we see evidence for us to believe otherwise.
It’s because human beings by our nature have always had a need to be at the center. The need for everything to revolve around us. It’s one of the huge flaws in us. Most people are so self involved and so self important. The ones that think this way often are not very bright I should add. We evolved to think this way and it’s still there wired into our genetics. Also the world’s religion’s teach us that we are at the center of the universe, so we’ve got that ever existing massive hurdle. Until science, which taught me the truth, teaches people the truth, the masses will continue along thinking like this, and just going on like oblivious fools
Can anyone explain to me: How do we know its the entirety of space that's expanding? How do we know the big bang isn't just an expansion of matter and energy into a pre-existing - and possibly infinite - void?
Part of it is that - assuming we accept the theory of relativity, which I would say is a healthy assumption given the massive experimental evidence - it is the only explanation of the fact that the further away objects are from us, the faster they appear to recede. That can only be explained by assuming space itself expands. If 'stuff' just kept on moving in all directions 'in space' from 'some explosion' this would not be the case. Try to visualise both concepts in your head and you can actually understand this. The confusing comment in the talk about that the space that makes up you is also inflating leaves out that inflation is overcome by gravity, which is why local galaxies don't recede for example. One is actually on a collision course with our Milky Way. Why it happens is a different question entirely of course, but the inflation of space is simply an observable fact, assuming (again) that Relativity is really a thing.
We dont. Its just the accepted theory on existence because the past few hundred years and we've decided that based on what we can see now must be absolute truth. I'm sure it wont change based on another few hundred years when we detect even farther out.... Oh also being unable to describe over 80% of the mass and gravity of the universe as just invisible matter isnt a factor whatsoever either. Its just fact. Even if we cant see, or interact or even prove what it actually is
@@nelson_rebel3907 GR has been tested over and over and has yet to fail in any of its predictions- bending of space-time due to massive objects, frame dragging, gravitational waves, time dilation, etc. That doesn’t mean a new theory couldn’t explain dark matter and dark energy, that’s just scientific progression. Just like Newton’s laws aren’t “wrong” Einstein just came up with a more complete theory
That’s what scientists are trying to discover. What might cause this expansion? Is the universe truly infinite, and what would that mean? There are many such unanswered questions.
It’s more fun to think about the meaning behind it all, why do we exist, and try to focus on your breathing as you try to fall asleep, all without making yourself insane or wondering what happens to you after death and what this all means.
Yes it definitely is!!!!! Thank you! This is the comment I’ve been thinking of in my mind but it wouldn’t pop in there until just now! Thnx!!! We spend too much mental energy contemplating the unknowns. Live life in the moment. Although truthfully the present moment doesn’t exist, it’s just the past events that pass into the future events but never mind the technicalities. Great comment
@@jeffreylehman1159 so the only human feelings are the ones that agree with you typical socialist leftist put your blue hat on get on your donkey and ride away
@@redsky1433 how dare u have an opinion of ur own. That's not allowed around here so ur going to need to leave buddy. We have an agenda here and don't need u spoiling it......hahaha totally being sarcastic. Can't believe some people take an online comment so seriously where they think they have the authority to tell someone else to leave. When's it going to end? If a person is telling someone else to leave that their not welcome is cuz that someone else is saying something or doing something that doesn't fit the narrative. I don't even care really just have to point stuff out when people don't get how it works. Which doesnt make me mad or tell people to leave no it's called educate don't discriminate. I have to admit tho it is quite funny and I do get a good laugh at those types of comments that's why I'll end up mentioning something usually along the lines of common sense and being logical usually leaving the person with no room to argue unless their arguing with themselves in their own room which that's funny also but at least that's a start but that's the only person they can so call win against arguing lol. That was a total surprise to hear how he included his political beliefs on something that those are not required on stick to the subject matter. After the lady talks at the then he talks again listen and look at how his body language is & hear how his voice is so different when he was up there giving his staged speech. He's all tense and stuff and nervous then the 2nd time he talks he's all comfortable casual and gets to explain his own words n opinions n knowing those are his own he's more comfortable n relaxed explaining n answering the questions..... Just my own opinion on what I noticed.
This shit is garbage to me,Tbh. Glad everyone’s excited that the LHC is about to rip open a portal & let ancient demons pour in. Jesus Christ is real & science was invented to disprove spirituality.
Great lecture about physics. Kind of ironic he's bashing capitalism when his particle accelerator is a staggeringly expensive tool built for basic research, not profit.
Great guy... Explains vividly and easily explained. Following him at "the royal institute" which, by the way, is a fantastic "place" with many fantastic people with fantastic lectures.
I used to lay in bed as a kid looking through the cracks in my bedroom curtains wondering about all this. My brain did the same thing then as it is doing now, overload and lock up.
Man I love these subjects so much I wish I had the math skills to enter this field. Dr. James is amazing at these lectures just dropping gems left and right.
Scientist and motivator! And I didn't think one can combine all these aspects in same lecture. My understanding of the universe(s) became better with your lectures without having to know all the complex math. Thank you!
Dr James' views of scientific truth is quite wholesome and satisfying as his notion of fear leaves the things quite open for the future possibilities of human desire to know in the decades to come.
That's fact he's doesn't understand his job or politics doesn't make me feel better about our place in ever discovering anything useful in explaining existence.
He knows his job. Thanks for being triggered! Fascists and right wingers actively prevent the progression of mankind and its gathering of information and furtherance of science.
One primary reason of objecting a super collider is not the fear of knowledge. It is the triage of limited resource to scientific inquiry. We have limited resources. And the unified quantum-gravity theory may not be the most important question. Dedicating resource to the super collider implies sacrificing funding for other scientific inquiry and discovery.
James, your thinking and questioning is pure magic, but you've said that space is vast and talk about distance in light years. But here's another thought, space is a single point, HERE and what we see as distance is an illusion, yet we interact with this illusion as 3 and 4 Dimensional beings. Everything is a vibrational frequency of light and what we see, whether it's with our eyes or the most advanced telescopes is very limited. We can't see what's really out there or even what's right here on earth because of our limited frequency band. There's a multitude of frequencies and a multitude of dimensions but before you can see them you have to develop a much more open mind, be an open door. Or do as I did, remove the door altogether. Time is another challenge for modern science. Time is not linear, therefore there's no beginning or end. Time is a single moment, NOW. It can be accurately measured in Planck units, the amount of "time" it takes light to travel across an atom. This is exactly the length of "time" a universe exists. As we see each universe closely resembling the last, we don't detect the shift, except on limited occasions but we quickly dismiss it. The science community is such a closed shop, that thinking outside the box and questioning the status quo is not encouraged, funding is removed, papers not published, etc. My insights are actual experiences. Not from studying other people's theories but now I'm discovering I'm not alone and there's more open minds out there. Just looking at our galaxy I've discovered much more advanced life and we are very primitive in comparison. Using human thinking, we're at least 1,000,000 years behind but the.good news is, our "FUTURE"can only get better. 💥
Thank you I'm glad I'm not the only one that noticed that it gets worse if you watch the rest of the video. Something about white privilege or something. Now I'll never listen to anything he has to say again I'll never click on him again. It's not only that I totally disagree with this politics but why bring politics into a scientific lecture. I think he just likes to hear himself talk and wants to spread his Ultra left wing crap on the rest of the world
Why does each galaxy in the universe spin WAY faster than it should? I wonder how many people in Gaza are considering this question .... I respect the question, but "what you ARE speaks so loud, I cannot hear what you are saying". It's GREAT to look at the stars .... just so long as the rest of humanity has the space to do so ..... and I say this to someone whom I KNOW has a deep social conscience. So, LOVE and .... kinda .... RESPECT.
Honestly if anybody is nerdy on this kind of information like me you've seen this guy before I don't really know him but I love the way he tells his stories it's so gripping. Man and I thought Brian Greene was intriguing and regular- knowledge people friendly. I will dig deeper in this man's work
Would it make sense that the interaction between energy and dark matter is what makes this plane of existence possible? That the universe (bubble) we live in is just that? Can it pop? Is it a snowglobe waiting to be shaken up again? Is the multiverse balanced or slightly askew to keep the perpetual motion going? Are we on the big turtle? I only possess a high school diploma I earned over 20 years ago, so the fact he was reading off a tablet and I'm watching him on my computer now, saying things my half-educated ass thought in 1996 is bonkers.
While physics isn't my field of study, from what I understand, the universe wouldn't exist as it does without dark matter. At the very least, galaxies wouldn't have formed without the concentrating and binding effect of dark matter. As far as the universe "popping," the closest to a consensus we currently have doesn't suggest a definitive end beyond the universe eventually expanding to the point at which even protons are torn apart in a process referred to as the "heat-death of the universe." Stars will exhaust their supplies of Hydrogen, Helium, and eventually every fusible element until only blackholes remain; at which point, they will slowly evaporate due to Hawking radiation over unfathomable spans of time and blink out of existence. That's currently the most popular view, at least, but like all science, it's provisional and liable to change. Oh, and _yes,_ it's turtles all the way down. Edit: Fixed some typos and awkward wording.
Great presentation...but I certainly did not expect a morality lecture on conclusion. Sadly we cannot dictate morality nor location and speed of an electron...
@@d.b.s.6381that’s because they are usually the educated ones that don’t believe in conspiracy theories or that the world was created by a mysterious man in the sky. Also they are the ones that don’t condone fascism.
@@d.b.s.6381ok well conservative or liberal now means nothing. It now means you’re insane because you identify as one or the other. Neither side knows what they believe or stand for. So that joke has lost all if it’s luster. If it even had some to begin with
We as individuals are both, the good and bad traits that the universe decides to either keeps around or weed out. The mind of an all seeing God which makes up all of everything would be incredibly lonely. Naturally, all of what makes up the entirety of absolutely nothing at all, becomes the canvass which brings forth everything. Anything. Improving the skills for creation in it’s every attempt.
Laymen here. According to our understanding of the inflation of the universe, space does not expand inside your body as stated by the professor. Space does not expand within a galaxy either, due to gravity. It is outside of galaxies that we observe space stretching, at a rate determined by Hubble's law. Also, the "two white males" comment was just silly.
@@DrSbaitsojr Even when the universe was very small, it was still everywhere ! You need to imagine the concept "null". Null is not a thing or empty space. It's not even nothing !
This sounds nice and perhaps scientifically dogmatic bc it’s an old cop out answer that is a paradox to itself. If the universe was everywhere, then how was it created? That’s an absolute paradox. Scientists have probably just as lousy of answers for this insanely important and prof question as religion has. Again, that might sound sweet to a cosmetologist, but the common critical thinking intelligent individual it makes no sense. It’s purely dogmatic at this point and again for the third time paradoxical :)
James Beacham, you have composed a poem, an epic, a symphony, which is the universe, our universe. I always thought that the universe, by definition, is all inclusive, and thus, there cannot be any "outside the universe". But then, we run into the problem of infinity. There is no way for finite beings to grasp infinity, not even the concept. Word is that, as you put it, infinity means repetition, and thus the existence of multiverse. We may need a different terminology, but, even within the current definition, multiverse need to break out of the traditional spatial confine to have any claim to existence. Multiverse is a dimensional concept, not a separate spatial existence, that inhabits within our own universe, within ourselves.
I can grasp infinity going forward. I completely comprehend an infinite amount of time from this point forward. I have a hard time grasping an infinite past. Obviously that comes from our idea that everything has a beginning.
@@Phillip713 Instead of hyper-sphere topology, with implication of big bang........ consider a hyper-torus topology, which allows locally observable less than uniform expansion, permits unobservable ( to us ) contraction elsewhere, accepts the possibility of saddle shaped spacetime, in which time is a circle with an ever moving "now" 180 degrees removed from an ever moving "eternity" ....... Big bang was never more than an implication of an assumption, anyway, and always raised more questions than it answered.
@@Phillip713 "I completely comprehend an infinite amount of time . . . " Do you? Do you, really? That's like, a termite, in Missouri, (no offense), saying, "I completely comprehend the total expanse, and depth, of the pacific ocean. . . . " Do you? Do you, really? No. No one can 'comprehend' eternity, going forward, or past; because, the one, is the same as the other. When it comes to eternity, there is no future or past, it all, just; IS. Sitting in the Doctor's Waiting Room may seem like forever; but, we can't immagine, the Doctor never appearing. Never! Ever, appearing! There would he no 'purpose' in our waiting. We can't comprehend Forever! We can try to immagine it. But anything we can articulate, will be mere speculation and assumption. Not comprehension. Not a full understanding.
In the beginning, God created the Heavens and the earth. Genesis chapter 1, verse 1. Time began , space and matter was created. God is the Creator of everything, as the bible says. Why not believe this?
This would have been a fantastic presentation had it not turned into a leftist political argument. How ironic that a scientist in the western world can criticize everything that made his science possible.
Bosons were hypothesised by Indian Scientist Dr Bose and were named after him. Whenever you mention HiggsBosons no one seem to mention the name of Dr Bose . It is always Higgs , a British scientist Dr Higgs particularly when coming to awarding Nobel Prize.
To be fair, dead people aren’t eligible for the Nobel prize. But I’m with you...Bose-Einstein condensates could be very important future technologies. He should be a household name
@@twt2718 - What has changed? A lot to f foreign exchange students solve problems and contribute vast amounts of knowledge only for their famous professors to receive the credit.
Would you be more satisfied if the particle was called the Bosehiggson? Besides, you can make the same point of many scientists, like Gunnar Nordström vs Einstein, or Tesla vs Edison. At least history is acknowledging their scientific contributions, even if its long after the fact.
Suggesting that inflation should have gone on forever at the same incredible speed of the initial expansion is like suggesting that if there was "nothing" (no universe) to begin with, that nothingness should have gone on forever. Since we so far can't measure universe creation, we have to guess at how to explain things that only happened once in the history of this universe, and they may not conform to the physics of this established universe that we can observe.
What is so fantastic? He said nothing finally! If I say that the bible says God created space matter and time (Genesis chapter 1, verse 1) wouldn't it be fantastic also? If not, why?
@@donaldgodin3491yea it would be fantastic if you stared anything from the bible. It is entirely fictitious. He mostly sticks to science facts. Don’t do the Bible thumping stuff here please!!!!
In the last decade or so I've often thought about how humans (& possibly other animals) may possibly experience the expansion of the universe & then that may possibly affect our experience of nostalgia. Most of us may usually agree that even independently of family life, we nearly always look back more fondly of our younger years and regard those times as being better back then & usually associate it only with different stages & ages in life. But what if; That is driven, at least in part, by an ability we may have to sense how the expansion of everything including in our bodies and around us progresses. Then as the years & decades pass we at least subconciously perceive & remember the relative differences in how close together things are & since it's always expanding, things seemed better years ago because everything was closer together !? There is at least a couple of ways that I can think of that we could perceive this & that's primarily; if light moves at a constant speed then everything takes longer & longer to percieve visually as time goes on &; electical signals would also take longer to get around our body and brain leaving us thinking (& maybe moving) slower than in the past. This possible ability of humans to perceive this could also affect or at least be partly responsible for our perception of time speeding up as we get older which I think nearly all of us would say it does. If there is any truth to that, I think our usually somewhat bias nostalgia is also naturally affected by other obvious factors such as levels of pollution, chaos & other things & events negativly, positively or neutrally percieved in our world around us & how we remember them. I'm aware of course that nearly all of our bias nostalgia may just stem from our lives usually being a bit easier to live to the fullest when we were younger. (1/Jan/2023-12:19pm🇦🇺EST)
Dear Mr. Beacham Gravity is just kinetic energy. vacuums don't have density. densless states of matter makes density move. Are vacuums states of matter what is the scale. vacuums are timeless and "(Massless?)" while electons are timless but they have density. vacuums then plasma then gas then liquid and solid to nuclear. but states of matter are more complex then that. we have platonic states of matter where extra protons are picked up. What is mass then is density and density is inertial energy. Gravity is kenitic energy because we are surrounded with gas which acts like plasma which acts like vacuums. the important part about mass is that the closer you are to the center of gravity the denser you are. What is a vacuum? What i mean by massless; is that any mass right there is being expanded faster than the speed of light. X-mass Y-velocity Z-mass S-speed Basically speed cancels each other out because everytime you speed velocity up it looks like you gained mass on object (a) because object (b) was inside with this graph. Which sounds familiar to me. Heres an example. \:The "Marry Go Round (MGR) experiment" You Johny, and Danny are playing on MGR A and B. Johny is standing on MGR A and danny is standing on MGR B. MGR B is sitting atop MGR A. Both MGRs get spun in the same direction. This experiment is decribe the difference between expansion and speed. You are the origin for Johny' speed and Johny is the origin for Danny's speed. What does Johny have speed in reference to~ you? Yes you are completely relative to his position. Thus Johny is relative to Danny's position not you; because you have no force enacting on Danny. Why does Danny move faster than Johny when the same amount of force is enacting upon them? I'll tell you why It's because Danny is expanding away. You see Danny has his own limit of speed; Johny can spin Danny as fast as light moves because Johny is Danny's origin. :\Plasma is timeless but vacuums the first state of matter are densless. Speed becomes fourth dimensional in a vacuum. Solids can store this extra dimension of speed really well because they hold shape. This is called inertial force. :\Expansion can easily be engineered in the same way the marry go round experiment does it. Lets say you create an electrical magnetic force inside a coil spun in the shape of a solo cup. the electrical magnetic charge is connected to a casing with coils of the same device in multiple sequences until you reach the expedition ship. Now of course you would have to allow the coil to be hot for anything to happen but you begin to expand at a rate greater than the speed of light and possibly even faster. Whats the problem; we have a limitation of devices. This is as far as i can take us into the future thank you. Sincerely- Ronald Braden Russell, __ or Mr. only has a highschool degree? ps device 2 laser computer __________________________ system one: I~ cast; II~ inner ring cylinder/gear(?) axel; III~ middle cylinder, IV~ brush anode connection, V~ axel. the cast doesn't move but (II) is a sum thick cylinder that moves on ball bearing means of a belt or gear system, (III) moves on the center axel and the (v) the center axel has some anode which collects information and sends it to (IV) who takes the computation numbers into the rest of the system. \:The inner ring has mounted lasers ~ and the middle cylinder has a glass waved medium with electricity flowing through. (II) and (IV) move independantely in oppisite directions to express a form of mass expansion replicating the movement of a black hole.
The Universe is warped in all directions. A straight line in any direction always ends up where it started. But not like a sphere. It's different than that. Any point in space is like the center of the Universe and it warps in every direction from that point back to that point . This creates both a finite universe and an infinite universe at the same time.
He really just went on a massive fucking rant. The white male comment was a little eye brow raising not to mention racist, but at that time stamp he almost loses his shit.
makes sense that all particles are actually just the comprisal of various fields, consider for a moment what that means in terms of the double slit experiment. The reason why observation collapses waveforms is inherently tied to the nature of multiple fields acting as factors having to be evaluated before a physical particle was found. Once the particles in the form of the double slit experiment were "found" or "spawned into existance due to observation" they produce a straight line, When unobserved until the point of contact on the sheet, it acts as a bellcurve with interferance lines. Why does observation collapse the fields and why do collapsed fields continue to act in a way similar to the particles we know? Because observation inherently is the evaluation of the fields through a physical lense (not like we know what that means on the quantum level), and the particles we know must be states inwhich the fields get locked into post evaluation; what we know as observable particles. There must also be some sort of field interaction with electrons, photons and the nucleus of atoms which would likely explain why we have this issue with tracking electrons around an atomic mass. It's likely that instead when the electron or photons hits the atom in question it is a change in the interlocked fields that make up the atom in question and the result is the decaying electrons or photons. Which would be a good reason why when photons hit atoms the energy states of electrons increase and why some substances can release light when affected by electricity.
I had the same theory on an infinite universe when I was 13 years old. It doesn't take a particle physicist to conjure this idea up. This guy basically said things we've already known for many years for an hour.
And then he laid a guilt trip on all white males for being white males …. I’m surprised he didn’t use that as a segway to a lecture on white privilege.
He says you would not exist if the higgs bozon did not exist. You wouldn't exist without all the other particles either. So this particle he is talking about is not more important than all the others. And who is to say you wouldn't exist even if all the known particles didn't exist. You may not exist the way you do now, but no one can say you wouldn't exist in a different way
@@DignanDurden regardless. All of it is necessary.. glue without anything to glue has no use. To say one is more important than the other, is like saying a woman is more important than a man when it comes to conceiving a child. The man and the woman are equally important to achieve that
Higgs is said to be the "glue" that holds matter together, which gives it mass. Other particles existed, but without the Higgs field we wouldn't exist because nothing would be held together.
Not knowing everything is what makes it that much more wondrous. Maybe it just is and that’s all we need to know. Maybe we weren’t meant to understand the universe. Maybe there’s beauty in appreciating the life we were given and the life that exists around us. Can we not ruin the moon please? Build a bigger collider here on Earth since it’s already overflowing with the waste of all our great achievements.
There is An Universe Observed By An Observer But There is Another Universe Felt By Heart Which is Much Profound Bigger Real Indestructible The Universe Melody And U Were Happily Facing the odds With Courage... U are A Philosopher Sir Along with Physics...
What if we all quit our jobs... yeah.. 1. We would get fired. 2. We would be homeless. 3. No one would mow your lawn or serve you a burger at a learning wage. Etc.
If "multiverse" describes regions of the universe that are outside of our "observable universe" and merely impossible to access because of "inflation" then those regions are still part of our universe. If, on the other hand, multi-universes are totally separate entities with "nothing" beyond their boundaries, then the CMB cold spot could not be due to a "touching" of universes because there are no physical coordinates in "nothing".
I would to add to rephrase a postulate he mentioned as " anything that is possible happens" Further evidence of muliverse is Schlesinger cat is both alive and dead, in fact at plank scale the universe is branching constantly at mind boggling rates. And if the universe is infinite since we are possible we happen over and over in all possibilities. So theoretically we may not travel backward in time but we can simulate and use evidence to view however dimly our past. This is nothing miraculous we do it every time we read a story or dream. Even more amazing is almost every humans ability to predict the future at least for short times in spite of this quantum multi versal noise. Also if we wish with either our internal or external assistance we can feel like we travel in time or to any multiree we choose. Also I think the social commentary was off topic and strangely reminded me of Schottky's story which is a cautonary tale about such things! The implications of these physics for us socially are profound and more than a little shocking implying both free will and fate to be valid perspectives from short to long time frames. This topic is huge and goes into information theory which is also becoming a perspective of physics.
He needs to seperate his political ideologies with the topic at hand. He's clearly intelligent but these are not simple issues. There are a lot of complexities when it comes to literal national borders and law and order. We may surely get to a point where national borders arent needed but until humans act under a universal level of law and order that everyone can agree on, they are a neccessary part of a society that is more advanced.
I agree totally. This is 100% proof that ANYBODY can be brainwashed regardless of intelligence level. He forgets one thing, without capitalism, there would never of been the opportunity for him to become as educated and intelligent on the matters he spoke about.
Check...Hmm? Separate.........? But just enjoy? his repeating of typical non moving on? I question what you mean by “he is clearly intelligent?” Just repeating what is lecture room blackboard stuff....! Non learning ...! Regards
"Electron is an excitation in a background quantum field that permeates the entire universe." It's amazing how uncannily similar the quantum field theory is to the theory of 'Advaita' or 'non-duality' from Vedic philosophy of India. My yoga guru gave the example of waves that rise and fall in a ocean an an analogy to explain the relationship between atman (individual consciousness) and brahman (universal consciousness).
@@itsROMPERS... lol classic leftist who has to interject politics into everything then when your told it's a detraction from the message you double down on your ideology. massive L there buddy
I learned a fair bit from this very interesting lecture . However, I started losing interest when he started reading from his iPad and going off on his left wing tangent .
It shouldn't be a political issue. Both left and right wing governments are guilty of some kind of insult to humanity. But we are usually getting better. Maybe he shouldn't have mentioned kids in cages, but I think he brought an idea that having an understanding of how the world works can help us think about how humanity ought to treat each other. But quantum physics can't explain why my neighbor sucks. So we're gonna have conflicts regardless of how we view the universe.
@@mjc429 fragile alt-right folks always feel they are being “attacked” whenever someone mentioned or speaks against something that is in contrast with their worldview. For all their crying about “cancel culture”, look at how they would love to chance this professor here.
Yeah I picked up on that.. I can't understand why colour should matter on who wins Nobel prize.. The genius who win the prize are picked on the merit of the discovery.. Something which will enrich all humankind.. The tone in which he said.. "2 white men again" is incredibly patronising toward people of different colour whilst diminishing the merit of the discovery in one sentence. Its ridiculous statements like that which keeps racism ticking over.. Why can't these people just celebrate that somebody has dedicated a lifetime of study and experiment to a profound end that enrich us all. . There is no barrier to anyone of any race to fall in love with physics and pursue it professionally if they are willing to put hard work into it.. I'm becoming so Intolerant of people like this guy..
I'm glad his lecture style works for so many people. Engaging the minds and imaginations of others sparks curiosity and discovery. Personally I find him cringe af...
![Beyond the Observable Universe [4K]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/mty0srmLhTk/mqdefault.jpg)
His hair style convince me that he knows what he's talking about.
I think he was/is Melany.
@@Kiryu_YTgt Bro, chill out
I LOLLED 😭
Another way of saying your iq at 189! Lol
The title convinces me that he doesn’t know the answer. Im not going to spend 60 minutes listening to someone make a guess.
The 2 people men who won the Nobel prize are not just 2 old white men. Very rude, considering the amount of work and sacrifice those two must’ve made to earn that prize.
Content of character my friend, content of character.
his dismissal of white men achievements is what i expect from a university "professor" these days
What you talkin bout Willis? 🤔
What comments do you expect from a flaming woke liberal?
I just don't see why he mentioned that. It just didn't seem appropriate. It seemed racist. Is the fact that white males have contributed greatly to science, math, etc. a mark against them? If so, then what about the NBA? Is it wrong that it is dominated by black males? What does James say when he watches an NBA game and sees the starting lineup - "five black males?" The "white males" he referred to were brilliant. There's a wave of feeling today that white male = bad, all others = noble beings suppressed by white males.
He is a strange one
universe is everything, then what is outside of it? This is a question that has been asked for centuries, and even today, we don't have a definitive answer. But as this video shows, the universe is not just a static, unchanging entity. It's expanding and evolving, and we're just starting to scratch the surface of understanding its mysteries. Melody, the narrator's childhood friend, was unafraid to ask the big questions, and it's that kind of curiosity and willingness to explore that has driven us to make so many incredible discoveries about the universe. Who knows what we'll uncover next
its a question for selft volunteer ignorants and brainwashed, sadly most of the stupid masses.
Research Satans/God FLAT EARTH
More humbling than any religion can ever provide ...
Didn't like his reference to two white guys winning the nobel prize with a snide remark and then his mention of priviledge and his apparent woke ideology. This was not necessary in an otherwise good talk. He should just stick to science.
Bosons are named after particles discovered by Indian Scientist Dr. Bose but nobody seems to mention his name when talking about HiggsBosons . It is always about the British , Dr Higgs including when awarding Nobel prize.
^what they said. also, never heard of political science? we don’t call it that for no reason 💀💀
@@truthsayer5824
@Sheng-Jin Zhou
The word ‘boson’ was named for S.N. Bose not because he discovered bosons. It was named so by Paul Dirac, a Nobel Prize winning physicist, to honour Bose’s contribution to the Bose-Einstein statistics, work he did with Albert Einstein on defining the general properties of all bosons.
S.N. Bose - great man, great contribution, but he has nothing to do with the Higgs boson in particular, except that this particle is a boson.
What’s being celebrated about the Higgs is not being done in denial of Bose’s contributions because there is nothing to deny.
The physics behind what's going on now has more to do with how the hunt for one particular boson is shaping modern particle physics.
@@marhier Thanks for that clarification.
James sir, you are an incredible lecturer, and educator. You make your lecturing come alive! Your articulating and the knack of making extremely complicated science classes, understandable to thick empty headed people like me, is a gift! You are special, my friend!! Thanks for educating me in the workings of the Universe! 😊
OMG, I just noticed that he's the teacher Mr. Van Driessen.
@@tomasinacovell4293 don't understand bab lol
He sucks, dry mouth and injecting hes dumb liberal comments here an there... Passssss
@@kevincasson9848it's OK your thick headed, it's to be expected.
in college, I took a black holes, relativity and cosmology course.. and asked my professor this very question.. what was outside the edge.. He laughed it off and said I was stupid for asking it and no idea what I was talking about. If this guy had been my professor.. I would have gotten an A in that course.. he explained it in 30 seconds.. even if it is just a theory because we really don't know.. it satisfies that question.
Retired teacher/prof/tech analyst here I have always thought that the brightest people are those who ask a LOT of questions.
@@williamwatts4790 thank you.
how can there Be an edge , when everything moves away from each other
every galaxy is moving away from every other galaxy at the speed of light ...
trust me , there's No edge
or we would see waves coming back in the background radiation picture
there isn't a center Because there is no edge ,
when you get That statement , you'll get the point
@@ThermaL-ty7bw back then and now.. I didn't come up with the idea of the "edge" I just asked if there was an edge, what would be beyond it.. so you're response isn't needed.. yet again youtube strikes!
Thank you
This has made me wonder and I want to wake up early every day to make a change to other folks lives
Questions like this are great seeds to plant in young minds.
It is FORBIDDEN KNOWLEDGE for the Human Animal to understand what the Universe really is.
This man is amazing, love his lectures! Keep em coming.
Some of the best explanations for things we all wonder about. Great speaker.
I don't why he suddenly pivoted to completely abstract discussion of life's existence with picking up the tablet and just reading off the script. Until then I was totally immersed in his lecture.
I agree you wouldn't understand
Yeah him suddenly holding and reading off the tablet was odd and shows he didnt fully prepare for this lecture. The whole portion of him reading off about how all electrons are the same and they are just part of the electron field not tobe viewed as individual entities was strange as well. I can rattle that off without having to read it off a screen.
I notice that too, I was engaged till he start reading from that tablet.
But in my mind I totally understand that. I guess he wanted to choose his words carefully especially when it meant a lot more philosophy and in morality. Look how he get back to the tablet at 44:40
It seems obviously he is avoiding any misconception might be taking out of context.
I reckon somewhere in the universe, there was also a particle physicist delivering a talk on social justice.
Why.
Hahahaha. That's cute!
You mean except for this one? "Two white males won the Nobel prize... what a surprise" I wanted to here about physics not sjw mentalities.
@@j.dmetalhead7517 he is a sjw delivering a talk on particle physics
@@C.D.J.Burton I was enjoying the video until I heard him say those words.
Its a shame.
I had to rewind the youtube video because I was suprised tbh.
For someone in His position to revert to that is shocking espeshialy when science itslef should be represented regardless of skin colour.
I was about to share His video on social media but after that statement he made I am declining.
I can listen 👂 🎧 to this dude talk about the universe all day long
I don't think the comment about "Two white males" was necessary. That was just weird.
Everybody should just watch the videos about the double split experiment to vaguely understand what quantum physics is trying to deal with.
And then watch a video on Entanglement and your head will just explode.
I don't know what's outside but there is a great diner at the edge
I’ll have a table for two at that restaurant…:- )
A giant microscope and a bunch of aliens watching us. Laughing.
Carl's Diner
Table for one lonly guy?
🤣😎 underrated comment! #42
I watched this twice. I love it James is the bomb. CZcams needs to invent a double-thumbs up icon thingamajig
Agreeable
Particle physics is a psyop, I great man said "if you want to find the secrets of the universe you need to think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration"
Yes, Tesla knew this
By far one of the best presentations of this subject
One of the most compelling words ever spoken that i have ever encountered. In the scheme of our universe our mother Earth is so insignificant, too small to be even noticed and we think we are big and mighty. we are not. What does it take for us humans to realise this Fact.
Question: Assume humans DO realise this and internalize it.
How does this knowledge change the way humans live, work and act here on Earth?
Earth is special and it is insignificant. It can be both things at the same time. Life may only exist on Earth out of the whole universe. But then again life may be abundant across the universe. But then again the universe is so big contact between life forms across the universe may be impossible. So we may be in effect alone.
@@redmed10 Exactly what I thought. We maybe alone. We maybe not. But we are effectively alone, 100%. Unless we see evidence for us to believe otherwise.
It’s because human beings by our nature have always had a need to be at the center. The need for everything to revolve around us. It’s one of the huge flaws in us. Most people are so self involved and so self important. The ones that think this way often are not very bright I should add. We evolved to think this way and it’s still there wired into our genetics. Also the world’s religion’s teach us that we are at the center of the universe, so we’ve got that ever existing massive hurdle. Until science, which taught me the truth, teaches people the truth, the masses will continue along thinking like this, and just going on like oblivious fools
When a physicst is also a philosophical poet, you got the magnificent James Beacham.
Can anyone explain to me: How do we know its the entirety of space that's expanding? How do we know the big bang isn't just an expansion of matter and energy into a pre-existing - and possibly infinite - void?
Part of it is that - assuming we accept the theory of relativity, which I would say is a healthy assumption given the massive experimental evidence - it is the only explanation of the fact that the further away objects are from us, the faster they appear to recede. That can only be explained by assuming space itself expands. If 'stuff' just kept on moving in all directions 'in space' from 'some explosion' this would not be the case. Try to visualise both concepts in your head and you can actually understand this. The confusing comment in the talk about that the space that makes up you is also inflating leaves out that inflation is overcome by gravity, which is why local galaxies don't recede for example. One is actually on a collision course with our Milky Way.
Why it happens is a different question entirely of course, but the inflation of space is simply an observable fact, assuming (again) that Relativity is really a thing.
We dont.
Its just the accepted theory on existence because the past few hundred years and we've decided that based on what we can see now must be absolute truth.
I'm sure it wont change based on another few hundred years when we detect even farther out....
Oh also being unable to describe over 80% of the mass and gravity of the universe as just invisible matter isnt a factor whatsoever either. Its just fact. Even if we cant see, or interact or even prove what it actually is
@@nelson_rebel3907 GR has been tested over and over and has yet to fail in any of its predictions- bending of space-time due to massive objects, frame dragging, gravitational waves, time dilation, etc. That doesn’t mean a new theory couldn’t explain dark matter and dark energy, that’s just scientific progression. Just like Newton’s laws aren’t “wrong” Einstein just came up with a more complete theory
If the universe is expanding there has to be an edge orbit can’t be growing.
That’s what scientists are trying to discover. What might cause this expansion? Is the universe truly infinite, and what would that mean? There are many such unanswered questions.
His hair cut does indeed demonstrate that he knows what he’s talking about. At the same time I don’t know what he’s talking about.
It’s more fun to think about the meaning behind it all, why do we exist, and try to focus on your breathing as you try to fall asleep, all without making yourself insane or wondering what happens to you after death and what this all means.
Yes it definitely is!!!!! Thank you! This is the comment I’ve been thinking of in my mind but it wouldn’t pop in there until just now! Thnx!!! We spend too much mental energy contemplating the unknowns. Live life in the moment. Although truthfully the present moment doesn’t exist, it’s just the past events that pass into the future events but never mind the technicalities. Great comment
There is no meaning to this merry go round!!! There is simply zero meaning. Just saying…
Thank you sir for educating us in the manner that you do. Truly appreciate you.
I am surprised this guy is actually a physicist at CERN. He has just turned a science presentation into a political rally.
@Redsky So a brilliant thinker isn’t supposed to have human feelings? Put your red hat on and leave.
@@jeffreylehman1159 Trying to cancel me? Misrepresenting what I said. You seem to be the classic lefty.
@@jeffreylehman1159 so the only human feelings are the ones that agree with you typical socialist leftist put your blue hat on get on your donkey and ride away
@@redsky1433 how dare u have an opinion of ur own. That's not allowed around here so ur going to need to leave buddy. We have an agenda here and don't need u spoiling it......hahaha totally being sarcastic. Can't believe some people take an online comment so seriously where they think they have the authority to tell someone else to leave. When's it going to end? If a person is telling someone else to leave that their not welcome is cuz that someone else is saying something or doing something that doesn't fit the narrative. I don't even care really just have to point stuff out when people don't get how it works. Which doesnt make me mad or tell people to leave no it's called educate don't discriminate. I have to admit tho it is quite funny and I do get a good laugh at those types of comments that's why I'll end up mentioning something usually along the lines of common sense and being logical usually leaving the person with no room to argue unless their arguing with themselves in their own room which that's funny also but at least that's a start but that's the only person they can so call win against arguing lol. That was a total surprise to hear how he included his political beliefs on something that those are not required on stick to the subject matter. After the lady talks at the then he talks again listen and look at how his body language is & hear how his voice is so different when he was up there giving his staged speech. He's all tense and stuff and nervous then the 2nd time he talks he's all comfortable casual and gets to explain his own words n opinions n knowing those are his own he's more comfortable n relaxed explaining n answering the questions..... Just my own opinion on what I noticed.
This shit is garbage to me,Tbh.
Glad everyone’s excited that the LHC is about to rip open a portal & let ancient demons pour in. Jesus Christ is real & science was invented to disprove spirituality.
Going to 43 minutes tells us who he really is....someone who wants what he wants, and knows better what you need. Sound familiar?
i saw it earlier when he slammed the notion of two white men as usual winning the noble prize or the higgs
Great lecture about physics. Kind of ironic he's bashing capitalism when his particle accelerator is a staggeringly expensive tool built for basic research, not profit.
How fast is the universe expanding? Has the speed of expansion reached the speed of light yet?
Great guy... Explains vividly and easily explained. Following him at "the royal institute" which, by the way, is a fantastic "place" with many fantastic people with fantastic lectures.
I used to lay in bed as a kid looking through the cracks in my bedroom curtains wondering about all this. My brain did the same thing then as it is doing now, overload and lock up.
Mine too!!! I knew most of what society tells us is the norm is actually bs at an early age.
No matter how difficult it is for us to understand, the undeniable fact is that the Universe is Infinite.
Talk about having some weird dreams after falling sleep listening to this lecture!
Maybe your dreams were the normal part
Man I love these subjects so much I wish I had the math skills to enter this field. Dr. James is amazing at these lectures just dropping gems left and right.
Scientist and motivator! And I didn't think one can combine all these aspects in same lecture. My understanding of the universe(s) became better with your lectures without having to know all the complex math. Thank you!
Someone hand this man a glass of water
This! Brilliant but the mouth noises are so distracting!!!!!
Dr James' views of scientific truth is quite wholesome and satisfying as his notion of fear leaves the things quite open for the future possibilities of human desire to know in the decades to come.
That's fact he's doesn't understand his job or politics doesn't make me feel better about our place in ever discovering anything useful in explaining existence.
He knows his job. Thanks for being triggered! Fascists and right wingers actively prevent the progression of mankind and its gathering of information and furtherance of science.
One primary reason of objecting a super collider is not the fear of knowledge. It is the triage of limited resource to scientific inquiry. We have limited resources. And the unified quantum-gravity theory may not be the most important question. Dedicating resource to the super collider implies sacrificing funding for other scientific inquiry and discovery.
James, your thinking and questioning is pure magic, but you've said that space is vast and talk about distance in light years.
But here's another thought, space is a single point, HERE and what we see as distance is an illusion, yet we interact with this illusion as 3 and 4 Dimensional beings.
Everything is a vibrational frequency of light and what we see, whether it's with our eyes or the most advanced telescopes is very limited.
We can't see what's really out there or even what's right here on earth because of our limited frequency band.
There's a multitude of frequencies and a multitude of dimensions but before you can see them you have to develop a much more open mind, be an open door. Or do as I did, remove the door altogether.
Time is another challenge for modern science. Time is not linear, therefore there's no beginning or end. Time is a single moment, NOW. It can be accurately measured in Planck units, the amount of "time" it takes light to travel across an atom.
This is exactly the length of "time" a universe exists.
As we see each universe closely resembling the last, we don't detect the shift, except on limited occasions but we quickly dismiss it.
The science community is such a closed shop, that thinking outside the box and questioning the status quo is not encouraged, funding is removed, papers not published, etc.
My insights are actual experiences. Not from studying other people's theories but now I'm discovering I'm not alone and there's more open minds out there.
Just looking at our galaxy I've discovered much more advanced life and we are very primitive in comparison.
Using human thinking, we're at least 1,000,000 years behind but the.good news is, our "FUTURE"can only get better.
💥
What did the two “white males” reference part have to do with anything? 🤔
Cringe comment... Specially him being white
yea im pretty sure those guys won because of how smart they are not because of skin color.
Nothing. But that little "ping" pales in comparison to his subjective sociopolitical speechmaking beginning at 42:28.
He can have his points of view but there's a time and place for them.
Thank you I'm glad I'm not the only one that noticed that it gets worse if you watch the rest of the video. Something about white privilege or something. Now I'll never listen to anything he has to say again I'll never click on him again. It's not only that I totally disagree with this politics but why bring politics into a scientific lecture. I think he just likes to hear himself talk and wants to spread his Ultra left wing crap on the rest of the world
NICE THAT A SCIENTIST IS ABLE
TO CONVEY “COMPLICATED
SUBJECTS” INTO PLAIN LANGUAGE FOR THE GENERAL
PUBLIC ….THANK YOU SIR ‼️.
Great Speach James, a delight to listen to you with much attention.
Why does each galaxy in the universe spin WAY faster than it should? I wonder how many people in Gaza are considering this question .... I respect the question, but "what you ARE speaks so loud, I cannot hear what you are saying". It's GREAT to look at the stars .... just so long as the rest of humanity has the space to do so ..... and I say this to someone whom I KNOW has a deep social conscience. So, LOVE and .... kinda .... RESPECT.
Remember when TED Talks were like this?
Honestly if anybody is nerdy on this kind of information like me you've seen this guy before I don't really know him but I love the way he tells his stories it's so gripping.
Man and I thought Brian Greene was intriguing and regular- knowledge people friendly. I will dig deeper in this man's work
Only watched 20minutes and this guy caught me up already even listening and reading tons of Mr. Green lectures.
Would it make sense that the interaction between energy and dark matter is what makes this plane of existence possible? That the universe (bubble) we live in is just that? Can it pop? Is it a snowglobe waiting to be shaken up again? Is the multiverse balanced or slightly askew to keep the perpetual motion going? Are we on the big turtle?
I only possess a high school diploma I earned over 20 years ago, so the fact he was reading off a tablet and I'm watching him on my computer now, saying things my half-educated ass thought in 1996 is bonkers.
While physics isn't my field of study, from what I understand, the universe wouldn't exist as it does without dark matter. At the very least, galaxies wouldn't have formed without the concentrating and binding effect of dark matter. As far as the universe "popping," the closest to a consensus we currently have doesn't suggest a definitive end beyond the universe eventually expanding to the point at which even protons are torn apart in a process referred to as the "heat-death of the universe." Stars will exhaust their supplies of Hydrogen, Helium, and eventually every fusible element until only blackholes remain; at which point, they will slowly evaporate due to Hawking radiation over unfathomable spans of time and blink out of existence. That's currently the most popular view, at least, but like all science, it's provisional and liable to change. Oh, and _yes,_ it's turtles all the way down.
Edit: Fixed some typos and awkward wording.
Great presentation...but I certainly did not expect a morality lecture on conclusion. Sadly we cannot dictate morality nor location and speed of an electron...
Oh and that's just the tip of the iceberg if the things you can't explain.
Hey, let's talk about science, but I also have to let everyone know I'm a liberal too.
@@d.b.s.6381that’s because they are usually the educated ones that don’t believe in conspiracy theories or that the world was created by a mysterious man in the sky. Also they are the ones that don’t condone fascism.
He’s not dictating anything. He’s letting you know objetive facts.
@@d.b.s.6381ok well conservative or liberal now means nothing. It now means you’re insane because you identify as one or the other. Neither side knows what they believe or stand for. So that joke has lost all if it’s luster. If it even had some to begin with
What he described from 36:00 onwards is also what is known as the Tao by the ancient Chinese sages in Tao Te Ching.
We as individuals are both, the good and bad traits that the universe decides to either keeps around or weed out. The mind of an all seeing God which makes up all of everything would be incredibly lonely. Naturally, all of what makes up the entirety of absolutely nothing at all, becomes the canvass which brings forth everything. Anything. Improving the skills for creation in it’s every attempt.
This is one of The greatest talks i have ever heard
I 've got it. He is Peter Sellers as professor Strangelove !
For me the political commentary really detracts from the rest of the talk.
and the racism
No it doesn't 🤨
@@prisoner1673a fellow lefty cult member, how's it going comrade.
@@jeffw8848 you are low IQ jeff
Always a pleasure listening to him speak. I have so much adoration for James 😌🤩
Agree!
This lecture was amazing
Laymen here. According to our understanding of the inflation of the universe, space does not expand inside your body as stated by the professor. Space does not expand within a galaxy either, due to gravity. It is outside of galaxies that we observe space stretching, at a rate determined by Hubble's law. Also, the "two white males" comment was just silly.
The universe is everywhere.
There is no "outside".
so the universe is infinite? the universe is expanding into its self? moron
@@DrSbaitsojr
Even when the universe was very small, it was still everywhere !
You need to imagine the concept "null".
Null is not a thing or empty space.
It's not even nothing !
Wow! You rock Tony! Keep telling it like it is.
But that doesn’t make sense
This sounds nice and perhaps scientifically dogmatic bc it’s an old cop out answer that is a paradox to itself. If the universe was everywhere, then how was it created? That’s an absolute paradox. Scientists have probably just as lousy of answers for this insanely important and prof question as religion has. Again, that might sound sweet to a cosmetologist, but the common critical thinking intelligent individual it makes no sense. It’s purely dogmatic at this point and again for the third time paradoxical :)
Get this guy a cup of water lol
He studies more and more about less and les, until he knows everything about nothing
Then he is indeed a genius if he's makin' bank by giving lectures about nothing.
1 way to put it..... Sounds like my old homies from da' hood
, " Everything is everything". LoL
That is the universe in a nutshell. The universe should have existed.
holy shit this comment and the replies are so incredibly hilarious. i think know you could convey so little with so many fucking words 😂💀💀
@@DignanDurden you are part of it now, welcome to the club.
Excellent presentation.
"It would be scarier if I were out here by myself" wow, that one hit hard.
James Beacham, you have composed a poem, an epic, a symphony, which is the universe, our universe.
I always thought that the universe, by definition, is all inclusive, and thus, there cannot be any "outside the universe". But then, we run into the problem of infinity. There is no way for finite beings to grasp infinity, not even the concept.
Word is that, as you put it, infinity means repetition, and thus the existence of multiverse. We may need a different terminology, but, even within the current definition, multiverse need to break out of the traditional spatial confine to have any claim to existence. Multiverse is a dimensional concept, not a separate spatial existence, that inhabits within our own universe, within ourselves.
I can grasp infinity going forward. I completely comprehend an infinite amount of time from this point forward. I have a hard time grasping an infinite past. Obviously that comes from our idea that everything has a beginning.
he has watched too many Marvel films it seems!
@@Phillip713 Instead of hyper-sphere topology, with implication of big bang........ consider a hyper-torus topology, which allows locally observable less than uniform expansion, permits unobservable ( to us ) contraction elsewhere, accepts the possibility of saddle shaped spacetime, in which time is a circle with an ever moving "now" 180 degrees removed from an ever moving "eternity" ....... Big bang was never more than an implication of an assumption, anyway, and always raised more questions than it answered.
@@Phillip713
"I completely comprehend an infinite amount of time . . . "
Do you?
Do you, really?
That's like, a termite, in Missouri, (no offense), saying,
"I completely comprehend the total expanse, and depth, of the pacific ocean. . . . "
Do you?
Do you, really?
No.
No one can 'comprehend' eternity, going forward, or past; because, the one, is the same as the other.
When it comes to eternity, there is no future or past, it all, just; IS.
Sitting in the Doctor's Waiting Room may seem like forever; but, we can't immagine, the Doctor never appearing. Never! Ever, appearing!
There would he no 'purpose' in our waiting.
We can't comprehend Forever!
We can try to immagine it.
But anything we can articulate, will be mere speculation and assumption.
Not comprehension.
Not a full understanding.
In the beginning, God created the Heavens and the earth. Genesis chapter 1, verse 1. Time began , space and matter was created. God is the Creator of everything, as the bible says.
Why not believe this?
This would have been a fantastic presentation had it not turned into a leftist political argument. How ironic that a scientist in the western world can criticize everything that made his science possible.
Bosons were hypothesised by Indian Scientist Dr Bose and were named after him. Whenever you mention HiggsBosons no one seem to mention the name of Dr Bose . It is always Higgs , a British scientist Dr Higgs particularly when coming to awarding Nobel Prize.
To be fair, dead people aren’t eligible for the Nobel prize. But I’m with you...Bose-Einstein condensates could be very important future technologies. He should be a household name
And he also lived at a time when almost credit was given to euro-centric scientists
@@twt2718 - What has changed? A lot to f foreign exchange students solve problems and contribute vast amounts of knowledge only for their famous professors to receive the credit.
@@kingwillie206 Vae victis.
Would you be more satisfied if the particle was called the Bosehiggson? Besides, you can make the same point of many scientists, like Gunnar Nordström vs Einstein, or Tesla vs Edison.
At least history is acknowledging their scientific contributions, even if its long after the fact.
Thank for this amazing talk ❤
Suggesting that inflation should have gone on forever at the same incredible speed of the initial expansion is like suggesting that if there was "nothing" (no universe) to begin with, that nothingness should have gone on forever. Since we so far can't measure universe creation, we have to guess at how to explain things that only happened once in the history of this universe, and they may not conform to the physics of this established universe that we can observe.
Absolutely fantastic presentation
Yea a bit too fantastic for a physics lecture.
This is like an Oniontalks. Pretentious, preachy, melodramatic, sulerficial, assinine, frivolous.
@@jamesbarlow6423 sßssßzzzzzzzzzsßzzzzzzzzázzzzzzazzzzzzzzzzzzzzzá ZZ zzz zzz zzz zzz zzz zzz azZzzzazzzzzzzZzzzzzazzZzzzzzzzzzzzzzZzZazzazzzza zzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZz zzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzaazzzzzazzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZzzzzazzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZZzaazZz as zzzzzZzzzzzzzzzzzzZzazzzzzazzAzZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzazzzZzZzazzzzzZzzazzzzazZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzazzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZZzzzzzazzzzzzz zzz zzzzzzzZzzzZzzzzzzZzZzZZZzzzzzzzZzz Zzz zzzzzzzzzzazzzzzzZzzZzzzzzzZzzzzzzzZzZZZZzzzzZZZzzzzzazZzzzzZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzazzzazzzZzzzzz ZZZ zzzzzzZzzzZzZzZzzzzzzazzzzzZzzZZZZzzzzzzzzZzzzZzzzzazZzZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZzzzZzzzzZzzzzZZZzzzzZzZzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzZzzzZzZzZzzzzzzazzzzzZzzZZZZzzzzzzzzZzzzZzzzzazZzZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZzzzZzzzzZzzzzZZZzzzzZzZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZzzzzzZzzZzzzzzzzzzAzzZzzzzzzzzZzZzzzzzazzzzZAZZzzZZZzzzzaZzzzzZzzzzZzzZzzzzzzzzzZzz zzz zZzzzzzzzzzzzZZzzzzzzzzZzzzZzzzzz zzz zZzzZzzZzzzzzzAzzZzzzzzzzzZzzzz Zzz zzzZZZZZzzzzzzzAzZzZZ ZZZ ZzzzzzzzZZZAZzzzzzzzzzzzzZz zzz zzzzzz zzz zzzzzzzz ZZZ Z ZZZ ZZZZZZZZZZ ZZZ ZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZzZzzZZZZ ZZZ ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzZZZz zzz zZzzzZzzzzz zzz zzz zzz zzzzzzzZ zzzzzzZzzzZzZzZzzzzzzazzzzzZzzZZZZzzzzzzzzZzzzZzzzzazZzZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZzzzZzzzzZzzzzZZZzzzzZzZzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzZzzzzZzzZzzzzZzzzzzzzzZzzzzzzzZZZZZZzzzzz zzz zZzzzZzzzzz zzz zzz zzz zzz zzzzz zzz zzZzZZzZzzzzZzzzzzZzzzzZzZzzZZzZZzzzzzZzzZZzzzZzzzzzZz zzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZzzZzZZZZZzzZzZzzZZzzzzzzzz ZZZ zzzZZz zzz zzz Zzz zzzzZzzzzzzzZzzz Za ZZz zzz Zzz zZzzz Zzz zZZz Zzz zzzzZzzzzzzzZzzz zzz zzz zzzzZ ZZZ ZZzzZzzzzZZZZzzzZzzzZz zzz zzz zzz ZzzZZZZZzzzzzzzzZzzzZzz zzz ZZzzzZZzzzz ZZZ ZzzzZZZ zzz zzzZ ZZZ ZzzzZzZZzZZZZZZzzzZZZZZZzzz Zzz ZzZZzzzZzz ZZZ zZwz zzz ZzZZZz zzz zzz zzz Zzz zzz zzzzzZZZZ ZZZ zzZ zzz z zzz zzz zzz zzz zzz z zzz, zzz zzz ZZZ ZZ ZZZ zzZZZ ZZZ ZZ ZZZ ZZZ ZZZ ZZZ z ZZZ z Zzz zZzzZZZzz zzz z ZZZ ZZZ ZZZ ZZZ zzz zzz zZzzZZZZZZzZZz zzz zzzZ ZZZ zzz zzz ZZ TOP Zzz zzz ZZZ Z ZZZ ZzzZzZZz ZZZ ZZZ ZzZz ZZZ Z ZZZ Z Z ZZZ ZZ ZzZ zzz zZZZZ zzz zzz zzz Zzz z zzz zzz zZzzZZ ZZZ ZZZ ZZ zzz ZZz ZZZ ZZZ ZZ zzz zzzzzz zzz ZzZZz zzz ZZZ zzzZZ zzz zzz zZz zzz ZZz Zzz ZzzzZZZzzZz ZZZ Z ZZZ z zzz zzZZzzZZZzZZzzzz ZZZ zZZZz zzz ZZZZ ZZZ Z ZZZ ZZ zzZZzz zzz zzz Zzz zzz zzzzzzZZZZ,z,zZzz,ZZZZ ZZZ z zzz z zzz zzz,ZzZzz ZZZ ZZZ ZZ Z,ZZzzzzzz ZZZ ZZ zzz Zz
What is so fantastic? He said nothing finally! If I say that the bible says God created space matter and time (Genesis chapter 1, verse 1) wouldn't it be fantastic also? If not, why?
@@donaldgodin3491yea it would be fantastic if you stared anything from the bible. It is entirely fictitious. He mostly sticks to science facts. Don’t do the Bible thumping stuff here please!!!!
In the last decade or so I've often thought about how humans (& possibly other animals) may possibly experience the expansion of the universe & then that may possibly affect our experience of nostalgia.
Most of us may usually agree that even independently of family life, we nearly always look back more fondly of our younger years and regard those times as being better back then & usually associate it only with different stages & ages in life.
But what if;
That is driven, at least in part, by an ability we may have to sense how the expansion of everything including in our bodies and around us progresses. Then as the years & decades pass we at least subconciously perceive & remember the relative differences in how close together things are & since it's always expanding, things seemed better years ago because everything was closer together !?
There is at least a couple of ways that I can think of that we could perceive this & that's primarily; if light moves at a constant speed then everything takes longer & longer to percieve visually as time goes on &; electical signals would also take longer to get around our body and brain leaving us thinking (& maybe moving) slower than in the past.
This possible ability of humans to perceive this could also affect or at least be partly responsible for our perception of time speeding up as we get older which I think nearly all of us would say it does.
If there is any truth to that, I think our usually somewhat bias nostalgia is also naturally affected by other obvious factors such as levels of pollution, chaos & other things & events negativly, positively or neutrally percieved in our world around us & how we remember them.
I'm aware of course that nearly all of our bias nostalgia may just stem from our lives usually being a bit easier to live to the fullest when we were younger.
(1/Jan/2023-12:19pm🇦🇺EST)
short answer - we don't know
Longer short answer - we will NEVER know
Thx, I owe you an hour.
Considering String and Quantum theory, we can’t know. We just cant comprehend it.
Considering String and Quantum theory, we can’t know. We just cant comprehend it.
Considering String and Quantum theory, we can’t know. We just cant comprehend it.
What a moving "talk". How much have a learnt from you. Thanks, a thousend thanks. Send my love to my sister in this universe, Melody.
The word “Evolved” is a fancy way of saying: created itself by itself from nothing itself.
Never touched the titled question. Glad I had it on double speed & jumped through it : False advertising.
There is one word to describe this WOW!. Very inspirational
This great till it got political
Dear Mr. Beacham
Gravity is just kinetic energy. vacuums don't have density. densless states of matter makes density move. Are vacuums states of matter what is the scale. vacuums are timeless and "(Massless?)" while electons are timless but they have density. vacuums then plasma then gas then liquid and solid to nuclear. but states of matter are more complex then that. we have platonic states of matter where extra protons are picked up.
What is mass then is density and density is inertial energy. Gravity is kenitic energy because we are surrounded with gas which acts like plasma which acts like vacuums. the important part about mass is that the closer you are to the center of gravity the denser you are.
What is a vacuum? What i mean by massless; is that any mass right there is being expanded faster than the speed of light.
X-mass Y-velocity Z-mass S-speed
Basically speed cancels each other out because everytime you speed velocity up it looks like you gained mass on object (a) because object (b) was inside with this graph. Which sounds familiar to me. Heres an example.
\:The "Marry Go Round (MGR) experiment" You Johny, and Danny are playing on MGR A and B. Johny is standing on MGR A and danny is standing on MGR B. MGR B is sitting atop MGR A. Both MGRs get spun in the same direction. This experiment is decribe the difference between expansion and speed. You are the origin for Johny' speed and Johny is the origin for Danny's speed. What does Johny have speed in reference to~ you? Yes you are completely relative to his position. Thus Johny is relative to Danny's position not you; because you have no force enacting on Danny. Why does Danny move faster than Johny when the same amount of force is enacting upon them? I'll tell you why It's because Danny is expanding away. You see Danny has his own limit of speed; Johny can spin Danny as fast as light moves because Johny is Danny's origin.
:\Plasma is timeless but vacuums the first state of matter are densless. Speed becomes fourth dimensional in a vacuum. Solids can store this extra dimension of speed really well because they hold shape. This is called inertial force.
:\Expansion can easily be engineered in the same way the marry go round experiment does it. Lets say you create an electrical magnetic force inside a coil spun in the shape of a solo cup. the electrical magnetic charge is connected to a casing with coils of the same device in multiple sequences until you reach the expedition ship. Now of course you would have to allow the coil to be hot for anything to happen but you begin to expand at a rate greater than the speed of light and possibly even faster. Whats the problem; we have a limitation of devices.
This is as far as i can take us into the future thank you.
Sincerely- Ronald Braden Russell, __ or Mr. only has a highschool degree?
ps device 2 laser computer
__________________________
system one: I~ cast; II~ inner ring cylinder/gear(?) axel; III~ middle cylinder, IV~ brush anode connection, V~ axel.
the cast doesn't move but (II) is a sum thick cylinder that moves on ball bearing means of a belt or gear system, (III) moves on the center axel and the (v) the center axel has some anode which collects information and sends it to (IV) who takes the computation numbers into the rest of the system.
\:The inner ring has mounted lasers ~ and the middle cylinder has a glass waved medium with electricity flowing through. (II) and (IV) move independantely in oppisite directions to express a form of mass expansion replicating the movement of a black hole.
The Universe is warped in all directions. A straight line in any direction always ends up where it started. But not like a sphere. It's different than that. Any point in space is like the center of the Universe and it warps in every direction from that point back to that point . This creates both a finite universe and an infinite universe at the same time.
47:42 why get political?
Biden will fix things yea ?
He really just went on a massive fucking rant. The white male comment was a little eye brow raising not to mention racist, but at that time stamp he almost loses his shit.
Fascinating! The idea that I am part of a quantum field that IS the universe is really cool.
Quantum fields
Scientific Spirituality or Spiritual Science?
@@jennifersimpson4061 neither.
Couldn't watch
Who talks like that
makes sense that all particles are actually just the comprisal of various fields, consider for a moment what that means in terms of the double slit experiment.
The reason why observation collapses waveforms is inherently tied to the nature of multiple fields acting as factors having to be evaluated before a physical particle was found. Once the particles in the form of the double slit experiment were "found" or "spawned into existance due to observation" they produce a straight line, When unobserved until the point of contact on the sheet, it acts as a bellcurve with interferance lines.
Why does observation collapse the fields and why do collapsed fields continue to act in a way similar to the particles we know? Because observation inherently is the evaluation of the fields through a physical lense (not like we know what that means on the quantum level), and the particles we know must be states inwhich the fields get locked into post evaluation; what we know as observable particles.
There must also be some sort of field interaction with electrons, photons and the nucleus of atoms which would likely explain why we have this issue with tracking electrons around an atomic mass. It's likely that instead when the electron or photons hits the atom in question it is a change in the interlocked fields that make up the atom in question and the result is the decaying electrons or photons. Which would be a good reason why when photons hit atoms the energy states of electrons increase and why some substances can release light when affected by electricity.
Don't have much to say. Amazing talk.
God is outside the Universe 🙆🏼♀️
How?
I had the same theory on an infinite universe when I was 13 years old. It doesn't take a particle physicist to conjure this idea up. This guy basically said things we've already known for many years for an hour.
I mean it does to show us the science behind it
Yeah that is his job. Theorizing about theories. If he was no human but a math calculation he would be 0x0.
And then he laid a guilt trip on all white males for being white males …. I’m surprised he didn’t use that as a segway to a lecture on white privilege.
He says you would not exist if the higgs bozon did not exist. You wouldn't exist without all the other particles either. So this particle he is talking about is not more important than all the others. And who is to say you wouldn't exist even if all the known particles didn't exist. You may not exist the way you do now, but no one can say you wouldn't exist in a different way
i see what you’re saying but it’s sort of the glue to the building blocks
@@DignanDurden regardless. All of it is necessary.. glue without anything to glue has no use. To say one is more important than the other, is like saying a woman is more important than a man when it comes to conceiving a child. The man and the woman are equally important to achieve that
Higgs is said to be the "glue" that holds matter together, which gives it mass. Other particles existed, but without the Higgs field we wouldn't exist because nothing would be held together.
@@mjc429 and without other particles the glue would have nothing to hold together. And once again you wouldn't exist
@@richardnelson4112 Richard is really just stating the obvious here!
Not knowing everything is what makes it that much more wondrous. Maybe it just is and that’s all we need to know. Maybe we weren’t meant to understand the universe. Maybe there’s beauty in appreciating the life we were given and the life that exists around us. Can we not ruin the moon please? Build a bigger collider here on Earth since it’s already overflowing with the waste of all our great achievements.
There is An Universe Observed By An Observer But There is Another Universe Felt By Heart Which is Much Profound Bigger Real Indestructible The Universe Melody And U Were Happily Facing the odds With Courage... U are A Philosopher Sir Along with Physics...
his explanation of how to give a example of higgs field standing on the bridge has made me realise the importance of the higgs particle,
What if we all quit our jobs... yeah.. 1. We would get fired. 2. We would be homeless. 3. No one would mow your lawn or serve you a burger at a learning wage. Etc.
If "multiverse" describes regions of the universe that are outside of our "observable universe" and merely impossible to access because of "inflation" then those regions are still part of our universe. If, on the other hand, multi-universes are totally separate entities with "nothing" beyond their boundaries, then the CMB cold spot could not be due to a "touching" of universes because there are no physical coordinates in "nothing".
There is no such thing as "nothing"
I would to add to rephrase a postulate he mentioned as " anything that is possible happens"
Further evidence of muliverse is Schlesinger cat is both alive and dead, in fact at plank scale the universe is branching constantly at mind boggling rates.
And if the universe is infinite since we are possible we happen over and over in all possibilities.
So theoretically we may not travel backward in time but we can simulate and use evidence to view however dimly our past.
This is nothing miraculous we do it every time we read a story or dream. Even more amazing is almost every humans ability to predict the future at least for short times in spite of this quantum multi versal noise.
Also if we wish with either our internal or external assistance we can feel like we travel in time or to any multiree we choose.
Also I think the social commentary was off topic and strangely reminded me of Schottky's story which is a cautonary tale about such things!
The implications of these physics for us socially are profound and more than a little shocking implying both free will and fate to be valid perspectives from short to long time frames.
This topic is huge and goes into information theory which is also becoming a perspective of physics.
Wow I'm completely awestruck, speechless, thankyou so much whichever part of the universe put this on youtube
He needs to seperate his political ideologies with the topic at hand. He's clearly intelligent but these are not simple issues. There are a lot of complexities when it comes to literal national borders and law and order.
We may surely get to a point where national borders arent needed but until humans act under a universal level of law and order that everyone can agree on, they are a neccessary part of a society that is more advanced.
I agree totally. This is 100% proof that ANYBODY can be brainwashed regardless of intelligence level. He forgets one thing, without capitalism, there would never of been the opportunity for him to become as educated and intelligent on the matters he spoke about.
I agree man but it interesting stuff 🤔
Ok boomer.
Check...Hmm? Separate.........? But just enjoy? his repeating of typical non moving on? I question what you mean by “he is clearly intelligent?” Just repeating what is lecture room blackboard stuff....! Non learning ...! Regards
"Electron is an excitation in a background quantum field that permeates the entire universe." It's amazing how uncannily similar the quantum field theory is to the theory of 'Advaita' or 'non-duality' from Vedic philosophy of India. My yoga guru gave the example of waves that rise and fall in a ocean an an analogy to explain the relationship between atman (individual consciousness) and brahman (universal consciousness).
I like sex.
Your yoga guru is an idiot that smokes too much weed and needs to get a real job.
Let
Love it until he talked about privilege...
The question they won't ask themselves because they can't answer it and never will is, why?
Why did the universe expand to the size it is and not some other size? What encouraged or limited the rate/amount of expansion?
Maybe some neighboring bubble or pocket universes????
Love the lecture, only issue if he leave the politics out of it. It does his lecture a disservice.
Of course. The only good presentations are the ones that fit your template.
@@itsROMPERS... lol classic leftist who has to interject politics into everything then when your told it's a detraction from the message you double down on your ideology. massive L there buddy
I learned a fair bit from this very interesting lecture .
However, I started losing interest when he started reading from his iPad and going off on his left wing tangent .
Haha, did he force you to cry MAGA tears? lol
@@motormania5250 You leave me completely confused.
What on earth are you on about?
It shouldn't be a political issue. Both left and right wing governments are guilty of some kind of insult to humanity. But we are usually getting better.
Maybe he shouldn't have mentioned kids in cages, but I think he brought an idea that having an understanding of how the world works can help us think about how humanity ought to treat each other.
But quantum physics can't explain why my neighbor sucks. So we're gonna have conflicts regardless of how we view the universe.
@@mjc429 fragile alt-right folks always feel they are being “attacked” whenever someone mentioned or speaks against something that is in contrast with their worldview. For all their crying about “cancel culture”, look at how they would love to chance this professor here.
Yeah I picked up on that.. I can't understand why colour should matter on who wins Nobel prize.. The genius who win the prize are picked on the merit of the discovery.. Something which will enrich all humankind.. The tone in which he said.. "2 white men again" is incredibly patronising toward people of different colour whilst diminishing the merit of the discovery in one sentence. Its ridiculous statements like that which keeps racism ticking over.. Why can't these people just celebrate that somebody has dedicated a lifetime of study and experiment to a profound end that enrich us all. . There is no barrier to anyone of any race to fall in love with physics and pursue it professionally if they are willing to put hard work into it.. I'm becoming so Intolerant of people like this guy..
Wow, beautifully spoken. Clear logical explanation
I'm glad his lecture style works for so many people. Engaging the minds and imaginations of others sparks curiosity and discovery. Personally I find him cringe af...
Well I guess so. He has the same hair style as my 5-year-old niece.
Love his style and his voice