[Intelligence-High School Debate] Ep.5 - Is it really safe to play Reality Games in public places?
Vložit
- čas přidán 1. 07. 2017
- Is it really safe to play Reality Games in public places? / 공공장소에서 증강현실 게임 플레이를 금지해야 하는가?
This House would ban the play of augmented reality games in public places.
The integration of digital information with a real-world environment - augmented reality! From science-fiction pipe dream to practical reality, AR games are changing the very nature of gaming these days. However, augmented reality games mean augmented security risks. Is it really safe to play these games in public places, or should they be banned?
On the fifth episode of "Intelligence - High School Debate," students from Korean Minjok Leadership Academy, Sangmoon High School, Dongducheon Foreign Language High School and Eunkwang Girls' High School debate over the motion "This House would ban the play of AR games in public places."
So, which two teams will make it into the semifinals this week?
다섯 번째 토론 대결의 출전 학교는 바로
[민족사관고등학교 vs 상문고등학교 vs 동두천외국어고등학교 vs 은광여자고등학교]
긴장감이 흐르는 가운데 밝혀진 다섯 번째 토론 주제!
공공장소에서 증강현실 게임 플레이를 금지한다.
언제 어디서나, 불특정 다수가 즐길 수 있는 증강현실 게임으로 인해 높아진 안전사고 발생률! 각종 경고 문구에도 불구하고 게임의 인기가 올라갈수록 사고율 또한 증가하는데...
게임에 관해 할 말 많은 청소년들! 결국 시간 내에 발언을 끝내지 못해 당황한 참가자부터
단단히 벼르고 나온 듯 자연스러운 모션과 함께 POI에 막힘없이 대처하는 참가자까지~
어딜 가도 뒤지지 않는 네 팀 중 준결승전에 진출할 단 두 팀?
Visit ‘Arirang TV’ Official Pages
Homepage: www.arirang.com
Facebook: / arirangtv
Twitter: / arirangworld
Instagram: / arirangworld - Zábava
![[Intelligence-High School Debate] Ep.6 - Welfare to families living with elderly parents](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/TvG5hmuaYfs/mqdefault.jpg)
![[Intelligence-High School Debate] Ep.6 - Welfare to families living with elderly parents](/img/tr.png)
![[Intelligence-High School Debate] Ep.14 - To be Global Citizens Instead of Instilling Nationalism](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/aUhDzk1pSKY/mqdefault.jpg)
![[Intelligence-High School Debate] Ep.8 - To Legalize Voluntary Euthanasia _ Full Episode](/img/n.gif)
I'm glad I found this channel accidentally, that I'm also searching videos that provide full debate mechanism in youtube
let me know if there are other channels like this, i am in love with this channel
@@sushildhakal9469 me too
@@sopiayeoja2823 watch oxford union's debate
Debaters there are more professional
the leader of opposition was good. I'll be having a debate this wednesday, i hope i can also express myself like her. wish me luck
good luck from 2 years later 🤧
@@fcknpiercedd0000 lmao
Good luck from 2 years later as well ☺️
Im late but did u do good man?
Replying because I want to know
the prime minister of the opposition's speech is so good. however i think she uses the word "right?" too much
Santa that’s may be her technique
and "basically" + "justification"
It's better than using "like"
I know right?
It’s a psychological tactic
Interesting debate! Very well spoken English, easy to understand; and both put up with valid points. Glad to see some future politicians! My compliments to organizers too.
Opening opposition just cut the prime minister off completely 😂
Good debate. There was times that I was swayed by both teams as they both had put out really good arguments that made me, someone from society who understands the issues that have been going around. It gave me a clear view on why we should or shouldn't ban it. It also made me think what we as a society should do on this subject and on how to stop or handle this issue from causing any more harm.
Misorang Natasha Seo Yes, I agree. For them having to summon up on what they have to say as they have to try to get their point across for them(the audience and judges) to understand on why they believe they should or shouldn't ban it with that time limit must've been extremely pressuring and nerve-wracking since it be hard to keep your mind clear(after hearing how much time your limited with)with finding the right words to say, but they still kept themselves composed and managed to pull through, putting down their explanations. I applaud them for that.
very impressive I'm accidentally here on this channel but believe me I'm stunned how curiously the debaters take into account every single point of each other. Amazing
46:45 The way the opposition whip said sorry and then giggled was cute lol.
Their parents must be so proud!
As a former youth Member of the Assembly I enjoy this lively and interesting debate. I hope that the young people will be active in the political life in Korea in the near future
Just watched the debate about punishing/ educating young law breakers. Participates are highly impressive, and their command of the English language is almost that of a native speaker. I am curious as to how they became so proficient in English, how many years have they studied/ been exposed to English language.
+Misorang Natasha Seo . I am looking forward to watching them.
@@yukiinu5534 I'm so sorry to reply to comment so late in 3 years lol, but I agree. As a native English speaker myself since I've been living in the united states, makes me feel so bad haha. Perhaps if I can somehow overcome my social fears, I believe I would be able to do things like these more often and of course "better".
I'm not a South Korean but I believe that there is quite a large number of south koreans that have spent time in the USA and Australia during their childhoods, if they didn't have an opportunity to move abroad- South Korean parents send their children to centres where they learn English if memory serves right and often encourage their children to learn the language fluently
I'm from the Philippines and some Koreans study here for few years to learn English. As a non-native speaker too, it will take years of studying and months of exposure.
The leader of the opening opposition slayss
deputy opposition's speech is SO GOOD!! 25:51 and she only got 21?!
Finally someone has said it.
She had a good speech but I feel like some of words she used to describe something did not accurately define what she was trying to say. She used the wrong vocabulary in some instances or wasn’t aware of the psychology behind something. I think that’s what confused people. But she had a way better speech than most of others in the beginning of the video, in my opinion, she should’ve had a much better score than them.
the deputy leader of opposition did so well, why'd she get only 21??
I hope all countries have this kinds of show
Woah...this debate really blew me away. The most important thing I could understand was that there is no particular way of seeing a cause. These participants did so well that by the end I went 'for' for both the parties. I wonder how proud their parents would be!
My advice for the participants is that they should make their argument more clear and easy to understand.Also they should use their time wisely and make the arguments as short as possible but you should also explain it well,point out the main idea in short they should be direct to the point.
I agree, they should’ve used words that were self explanatory within themselves and then expanded it if somehow someone didn’t understand the intention, they should’ve also talked it out with their partner first because sometimes they kept on repeating what their previous partner said, instead of that they could’ve added on.
14:30 wow really? I would be more convinced with the leader of opposition's speech
Yeah, even I was shocked
the arguments and the the confidence that the closing government had were convincing. The opposition whip was so full of confidence and the member of government was very good with all the analytics he represented .Hands up from my side to both of you
Thank you very much for this, I was very amazed by their english and their good arguments!! I have a debate competition soon so this is a really helpful example for me to know how to do well
why do i see stays everywhere 🙄(im a stay🤭)
the Opening Speaker presents her argument so precise and accurate.
Why they′ve given her such a low score...
maybe she wasnt stuttering a lil bit and wasnt that confident?
That boys reaction at the back though😅 20:40
Op Gov laid out her arguments really well! Kudos!
The anchors diction is so good I just love it
I think the goverment whip also did a great job. He really on point, I like the way he speech. But I also have to admit, that the leader of opposition did a really great job (the ways she speech) she rarely see text, and seeing her opponent (the goverment here). But I guess she, said "right?" a bit too much.
I like the second speaker's way of speaking very confidently!!
Exaxtly mam you. Say the true word.We have less courage to believe in ourself.
Ah I miss those debating days.
Lee si-won the prime minister is really arguing like leader. Have you played Pokemon go before was like do you know what you are talking 🔥🔥
15:43 did only I think about math when the DPM said "differentiate the reality"?
The rapping rhymes. 44:05
I never thought that koreans can speak in english fluently.I'm shock but they are really good
Actually I came here because I want to improve my english communication skills.I hope it help me.
Park Jin-ha did amazing. I completely agree with her. Hands down
I don't know why people are praising the LO's speech, her execution is very good but there are too many holes in her arguments. One is that she compared economical benefits to human lives and said that those benefits actually outweighs the harm which is loss of life. I actually can't believe none of the government side didn't rebut this.
What's the use of playing pokemon?
I Like the first speaker of the member of the government park dong han, and he's only 10th grade, wow. I think now he already graduated
Before going onto ny constructive speech i will be defining the motion. The givernment would like to define 'voluntary euthanasia' as that in which a menatlly stable erson is consciously aware of the decision they are making regarding their death. We also would like to define 'non-voluntary euyhanasia' as that which a person is not able, on any conscious level, to acknowledge their own existence, life death circumstance, or even suffering to that which another person is able to make the decision of life and death for them
Please invite filipino debaters because they are excellent pertaining of this debates.
This is a national debate show if I'm not wrong so they cant be invited
Pretty interesting debate considering they're in high school and also they are debating in English.
what is this motion
the leader of opposition didn't answer the first question properly and kept on rejecting poi's from other teams while she constantly bumped in the prime minister's speech wasting at least 1.5 min of her speech. I find it as a dirty tactic to ruin their speech
what? she needed to delivery her speech lol otherwise she wont have time lol
She has a time to chase to finish her speech
What do poi’s do? I’m confused lol
Oh nvm, I get it now
요환이형 군대 잘 보냈자너..
Of course the opposition is the winner because of most of them were / are actually playing the game...
I lost my faith in that team the moment she said "Soccer" in London in 13:00.
Is it just me or does the emcee look like Irene from RED VELVET?
Kinda a bit lol
no
haha what? she looks more like if irene and wendy had a kid
@@pris_an nah not really. Even if she did it's not that noticeable.
RCj Studies she looks more like Naeun from A-Pink
anchor is really beautiful 😉
the first girl was so amazing
3:25
Propoganda is good when it encourages the betterment of scoceity
I love your voice (Host)
23:17 I don......
Right!!!!! Lmao 😂😂
โอ้วววมีคนไทยด้วย
It's ok to display your nationalism but sometimes too much of it makes things awkward.
They cant say 69
Reading
I’m not even gonna watch this I’m just saying if augmented reality was banned in public that would be the end of Pokémon go.
Oh really...
Ngl, I didn’t connect with most of the points in the video. Expect only a few. There wasn’t enough analysis on either sides of the coin.
They could’ve used the laws in Korea and connected it with Gaming. While it’s true that Drinking while driving isn’t on the same level as an augmented reality game. It could’ve been used as a metric system for any repeating patterns that may come up, This is how most laws work. You can’t just make a law without looking at a comparison or you could end up contradicting yourself.
Drinking while driving is illegal under the influence, but drinking on its own is not illegal as long as you don’t pass the limit of legal consumption, you are allowed to drink and drive. This is a common point that most debaters utilize in their argument and I’m surprised it didn’t get used here.
손들을 흔들지 않고는 잘 안되나보다^^
토론이나 연설에서 적당한 손 제스처는 신뢰감을 줄 수 있어서
학원에선 일부러 제스처 가르쳐주기도함;
뭐 몇몇은 긴장돼서 나오는 습관같기도하지만 ㅋㅋ
님보단 저 친구들이 자다가 잠꼬대하는 말이 더 설득력있고 유용할듯
@Edward Kim 영훈이?
@Edward Kim 1시간 전에 너랑 수업함. 여기서 이렇게 계속 떠들면 위에 분들께 피해가 가니까 말하려면 내 영상 댓글에다가 달아놓던지 해
Integration
Gaming
Augmented
Computer generated
Briefly
Dent
Blurred
Parallel example
Regulate
Justification for V ing
Prioritize
Misuse
Overuse
Utilize
Unwary
Intervene
Genetically
Vandalism
Threshold
Arbitrary
Negligence
Landmark
Monument
Adjudicator
Differentiate
Opt out of smt
Substantive
Exclusiveness
Intake drugs
Rationality
This is boring go watch UST and UP debate
i bet you're not even half as good as them
I TAKE THIS AS AN JOKE..🙂