I'm not a Republican. Born and bred Democrat. Kennedy died the day after my birthday. I cried my eyes out. I watched Oswald shot on live tv. Kennedys death doesn't have anything to do with Trump.
I was a senior too, and I happened to hear it over the school intercom system. It was noon, and everyone was outside at lunchtime. No one believed me when I told them. I was not surprised it happened. Johnson and Kennedy hated each other, and I thought to myself with is Kennedy going to Texas to campaign. It was like a slap in the face of Johnson when Kennedy was having Johnson's best friend, Billy Saul Estes investigated.
@@ronwinkles2601 There is evidence LBJ knew about the plan to kill JFK. (Lying Lyndon even ducks down in his seat a few seconds before the shots begin!) But it's not likely he was in on the planning. That was done by GHW Bush.
@@ronwinkles2601 Billie Sol Estes, another corrupt con man along with Bobby Baker and LBJ. A.G. Robert Kennedy was having LBJ investigated, with the Senate close to finishing its work in making ethics and bribery accusations, and LIFE magazine about to release its findings on LBJs crooked, bribery actions the next week after Nov. 22 but.scrubbed it because he was now #36. Pres. Kennedy had already told his secretary Evelyn Lincoln (she put their conversation in her memoirs-book, documenting it) after she ssked about LBJ on Wed. Nov. 20, with, his reply, 'No, it will not be Lyndon. I'm thinking of Gov. Terry Sanford." From NC, who was a moderate on civil rights. Kennedy's real first VP pick in '60 was NOT LBJ, but Sen. Stuart Symington (D-MO), a defense hawk. LBJ-J.E. Hoover blackmailed Kennedy to pick the Sen. Majority Leader. Bobby Baker, LBJs Secretary to the Senate, said LBJ had planned his takeover since July 1960, when he got to be the VP nominee, and he knew LBJs corrupt and power-hungry mentality the best, as also in on the bribery (kickbacks) along with LBJ.! This proved LBJ planned to have Kennedy murdered before his term ended, when it could be arranged, and the trip to Texas was the place where LBJ and his cohorts (Ed Clark, LBJs financier) had the power to control the events both during and after the murder with the cover-up. Estes and Baker were indicted, convicted, and jailed. LBJ became president, never suffered any legal penalties, but he was a mental wreck, a sociopath, alcoholic, corrupt blackmailer and kickback (bribery on key legislation his entire Congress and VP career) artist.
I believe it was not a theory but a blatant coverup. You have to remember that back then, we didn't have access to information like today. Alan Dulles was a traitorous Right-wing criminal. There's a great book called "The Devils Chessboard" by David Talbot. It is an eye opening insight into how much influence the Dulles brothers had on the shaping of our nation before and after Kennedy. The Dulles bros were NAZI sympathizers if not outright collaborators. check it out!
Like the 911 Committee set to fail. No accountability or jailed. Bush and Cheney ignored testifying under oath and go away with it. Clintons didn't. Republicans do since they are usually guilty since Nixon. Eisenhower our last good Republican president.
The Warren Report - and I can tell you're obviously not the least bit acquainted with it - was an extremely detailed (maybe too much) investigation that basically got it right. There were some flaws, naturally - no snickering here from anyone who who doesn't know sh&t about it - but they basically got it right, for sure.
The best way to prove Kennedy was a victim of a conspiracy is to prove Oswald innocent.. A fair trial could have done that ,and that is why Oswald wasn't permitted to live to stand trial.
He said he didn’t kill anyone. He begged for a lawyer. Instead, he was murdered by Ruby, who was in so deep with the mafia that he couldn’t see his feet.
He made no attempt to "spill the beans" to ANY cop during hours of interrogation, to any member of his family, to the President of the Dallas Bar Association, or to a live TV audience of millions. Instead he lied to police, refused to cooperate with any investigator, acted so smug and placid he even convinced his own brother he was guilty, and just shrugged a hollow, unsurprised, rambling reply when asked on live TV, "Did you shoot the President?"
@@nbenefiel H Louis Nichols, President of the Dallas Bar Association, who you can easily look up being interviewed on live TV, visited Oswald on the Saturday (AFTER Oswald made his public request for somebody to come forward and represent him), to learn whether Oswald's rights were being violated... and Oswald assured him they were not, turned down his offers of help, and sent him packing pending learning whether he could get his first choice, a lawyer he'd never even met living in another state who specialized in left-wing causes.
For sure, all of this, folks!! We can now assume the obvious to be the truth! Eh. BTW, I was watching the Z-film again and right after the headshot(s), and as Jackie looks up and sees John’s scalp hanging off to the right off his head, she reaches to the back-right of JFK’s head with her fingers and wipes, messes the area with her right hand! Then as she is almost standing on her way to reach onto the trunk, she does it again, with her left hand fingers. Gives that area some finger attention. That apparently is the spot where the piece on the trunk came from. Of course that area we are told nothing about in the snofficial report!
I admit, that having done some "research" I have no idea what the Kennedy truth is, But, being a registered Independent (in 5 states over last 50 years) I resent when ANYBODY uses a political PARTY to push their personal agenda. BOTH sides do it!
@@radar0412 The poster and the motorcycle cop, riding to the left and behind Jackie, who got hit with the blood and brain matter so strongly, he said he thought he got shot, prove you are wrong! No accurate ballistics evidence support your misguided idea. None! The WC lied and lied, and then lied some more, to cover the inside job it was; including the corrupt, bi-polar, scheming man who lusted for the presidency ever since he told his school kid friends at school he would be president one day. He was then 10,, and he was the VP, who became #36.
@@radar0412 Trump, I suppose. Who in fact kidnapped the Lindbergh baby and also killed the dinosaurs. If you don't believe that now, I'm sure you could easily be convinced.
According to the Parkland doctors have always insisted that the head shot came from the front. They were the first to see him, so they should know. The Bethesda autopsy docs had never done a gunshot victim before. Dr. Wecht says that all the top forensic doctors in the country were waiting to be called but they never were.
Parkland doctors at their first live press conference are speculating wildly about the wounds, unable to conjecture about numbers, directions, etc. They were concerned with trying to save Kennedy's life, they were not conducting an autopsy. They looked at the autopsy photos for TV and had no particular problem with them. That lying sack Wecht firmly reported the evidence shows the shots came from behind before he started cashing in a a conspiracy champion.
Dr. Malcolm Perry, the very first doc to tend to him, said in his report, the wound was in his THROAT, just below his Adam's Apple, right where Perry could insert his tracheostomy tube to help the breathing. That small round wound also came from the FRONT, again proving a conspiracy because the patsy was supposedly shooting from behind. So, not only was there another proven shooter, but the patsy also told the truth when he DENIED shooting anyone that day! No proof he did, but passing the Dallas PD nitrate test for gunshot residue that same afternoon proves beyond doubt, he shot no gun that day. His last test in the Marines was in May 1959 to a very lowly 191, barely over the 190 lowest-level "marksman" label. A real sniper-hired assassin would have had a recent test at 210, "sharpshooter" level, or the highest, 220 "expert" level. A test 4 1/2 years before, and no practicing since, again shows the fraud that was the cover-up WCR against the scapegoat!
@@RoseBud-fk4qg Kennedy is very clearly seen to suffer a massive exit wound exploding at the right temple in Zapruder's film consistent only with a shot from behind.
This was just the beginning of the government becoming one of the world's worst tyrannical communist governments, the second amendment was to protect us from the communist invasion we now face, Eisenhower signed into law in 1954 the Anti Communist Act Making any communist collusion a criminal offense, now congress is full of communist and neither party objected.
David, I'm with you. I'm 72 and I agree with your insight. I'll never forget that day. I'll never forget Walter Concrite announcing the horrific news and being openly emotional.
It appears that Mr. Feldman actually has no idea about what happened to Kennedy and just uses the topic as a ruse for his spewing out his political bias. Talk about someone that's incapable of doing the homework! He should first look in the mirror.
@@peterfraser9070 If you were alive when it happened, you saw both Kennedy and Oswald get shot in real time. I saw it in real time & it happened as reported!
The surgeons at Parkland Memorial told us what happened. All six of them who were there that day said the fatal shot came from the front. At the time the Secret Service threatened them to keep quiet. But they spoke up long after that day. So there is no question that there was more than one shooter. Therefore it was a conspiracy.
Absolutely - I have seen multiple witnesses attest to this - the medical team initially started answering - about fatal shot from the front and were then - instructed that was NOT what they found
READ THIS >> People believe Ruby had to deposit some money to a stripper, that's why Ruby was at the police station at that time. How ? Because the 'police" found the receipt in Rubys pocket ? Along with Oswald's bus receipt (and didn't escape the scene in a car like another officer stated) because "police" stated he had a "time stamped bus receipt" right. But why do people believe those 2 versions yet people don't believe other "police" versions. Ruby wasn't depositing money to a stripper at the exact time the most protected prisoner in history Lee Harvey Oswald was being moved through a protected police basement to another prison. The same guy Ruby was supposed to kill coming out of the depository that Friday after shooting JFK (and be hailed a hero) !! But why do people believe those 2 versions? Simply because of 2 ticket stubs ? If you could just get hold of 2 ticket stubs you can change history and cover up the crime of the century. (,And those 2 ticket stubs, one from a money transfer the other an easily forged time stamped bus ticket with months to organize this evidence to produce to the Warren Commission and make it appear everything is legitimate and true. It was so easy covering up the crime of the century when it was done in the Vice Presidents backyard with him now the most powerful man in the world. Food for Thought .....
More food for thought: as always, conspiracy theorists jump through hoops to let Oswald off the hook at every turn even if it requires that basically every person involved in the investigation was a lying traitor falsifying evidence.
@ShanefromSydneyAustralia When you flesh out these conspiracy theories, examine all the logical implications, they fall apart because there's no logic there at all. It's only a perverse pastime, a game played by the theorists, who while never having a speck of credible evidence implicating anyone else, pathologically carp over every piece of damning evidence against Oswald, flailing and ultimately failing in efforts to get their boy off the hook. But why they do it remains an open question, one we'll reserve for abnormal psychology,
The 700 lb gorilla in the room is why does NO ONE who pontificates on JFK ever press for his body to be exhumed for a proper autopsy!?! It probably isn’t even his corpse in the grave!!
@@radar0412 We don't know the names, but the nitrate test in LHO came back as a telltale NEGATIVE. So we know for sure it was NOT Oswald, along with frames #312-#330, 1 Sec, showing the BACKWARDS motion of Kennedy's body, proving the fatal shot was from the front! Why else do you think the Z-film was hidden from the public in its entirety until Mar. 6, 1975, almost 12 years later, on Geraldo Rivera's late-night tv show when he showed it to a stunned nationwide audience? His body flying backwards into his seat and left prove it could not be where the WC said he was, in the rear! That's all the proof you need to end the "lone nut" theory proposed by Arlen Specter, who made-up the ridiculous 1-shot-hits-two-men theory. John Connally, a rifle hunter disagreed with that loony theory, saying he was hit by a separate bullet, and believed that for the next 29 years of his life!
@@radar0412 Only chess doesn't work that way unless you can move the pieces around while the other guy goes to the can. Guilty till you prove otherwise -Nancy Belapelosi and the current partisan authoritarian topsy-turvy view of things.
@@radar0412 Mac Wallace was in the window of the TBD. Other shooters were on different roofs, and obviously someone was on the grassy knoll. Checkmate indeed.
One thing I can promise you. You'll never see any physical evidence from either crime scene that didn't belong to Oswald for the rest of your life. You have my personal guarentee.
It was incredibly stupid to ride in a topless convertible Lincoln and somebody put the route in the newspaper the day before so it’s clear to me jfk was about to dismantle the CiA and someone up high green lit the hit.
I was a 17 year old kid, but I knew Kennedy was asking to be shot when he went to Texas. He was investigating Johnson's friends, devaluing the silver currency, putting up signs to CIA Headquarters, failing the Chicago mob in their attempt to take back Cuba, and pissing off the Joint Chiefs of Staff on not continuing the Vietnam War. The writing was on the wall!
"somebody put the route in the newspaper the day before": on Tuesday, Nov. 19th, and riding in a convertible was common. What is clear is that you jump very easily to big conclusions.
I remember that day so well. When people heard Kennedy had died, there was such shock and some men and women cried openly. Remember Mort Sahl, too, but didnt know of his interest in this.
David, I live in the Dallas region. I work part-time as a shuttle driver for one of the large car rental corporations. One of our locations just so happens to be in downtown Dallas, and so invariably as we leave we always pass that area of infamy. And every time David, Every time, I pick up this strange form of low energy that emanates from that area, this vibe, ( and no, I'm not delving into metaphysics here thank you very much ), it's the reality that an American President was murdered here. You see people from all over walking around the knoll, a store that sells memorabilia ( which I find ghoulish )... It's simply surreal. If you should ever visit the book depository building, you can glance out the window where Oswald allegedly shot the president, and you may ponder as I did that day glancing out..." I'm not sure about this. Oswald was allegedly a very good marksman, but you still wonder. Thank you, David Peace.
Oswald's last known firing of a rifle was in his 2nd, and final Marines test in May 1959. That was 4 1/2 years before! He scored a sickly 191, barely making the lowest rank, marksman, needing 190. A sharpshooter is the middle level, where most sniper accuracy is needed, is at 210. The highest level is expert, needing 220. So, realizing the low level he was, and time elapsed without practicing since May 1959, proves he did no shooting, as does his testing for nitrates at the Dallas PD, when he had none on his hands, face, or clothes! Also, someone else shot the cop, J.D. Tippit, witnesses reported a short fat man who they saw, so it could not be LHO. It was a setup against him, as he knew, by denying any desire for publicity, and that he was just a Patsy, the fall guy, or scapegoat, while the real planners and professional shooters got off.
@@peterfraser9070 Never shot anyone that day. You haven't been keeping up with the facts after Nov. 24, 1963. At all! Witnesses on the 4th floor came down those stairs, heard or saw NOBODY! The 6th floor layout was a neat plant, to frame the man who DENIED doing it, so he did NOT want "publicity" as the story-government narrative goes! Oswald PASSED a nitrates (gunshot residue) test, proving he shot nobody, and that includes the J.D. Tippit murder! "The Girl On The Stairs" (2013) by Barry Ernest, destroys the "6th floor" theory! The Z-film proves at #313 to 331 (1 sec.), Kennedy's body slammed BACKWARDS, proving a FRONT shot. Everything you have apparently read is only the one-sided fraud! The discrepancies, lies, and half-truths prove the fraud on a "lone nut" when he was a patriot, an FBI Informant. They don't shoot people, they are patriots, and he was made the scapegoat, or PATSY in his immortal words.
Actually, Oswald was in a good Marchman. He was really poorly and Paul rifles in a long time and practice so if he did it, he got lucky but I don’t think so. I think there was others involved for what reason I don’t know Andrew I don’t know, but I’ve studied it since 1980 and there’s something weird extremely strange about what happened.
I worked with Mort Sahl at WRC Radio in 1978. He was the PM Drivetime host, and I produced the show that followed his. I would chat with him when he arrived to prepare for his show, and also would chat with his wife, China. who dropped him off at the radio station (an NBC O & O) on her way to the racetrack. Mort was entertaining, funny, but in a quick, topical way, not just a guy who cracked jokes. He called everyone, me included, "Pal," because he couldn't remember everyone's name. He got let go after about 6 months, not because he wasn't entertaining, but because the radio station spent nothing on promoting his show. We did chat a bit about the Kennedy assassination; I was 12 when it happened and had vivid recollection of the event, and he was interested in what I thought at the time it happened. I only wish now I 'd recorded our conversations for posterity. Had he lived long enough, I'm sure his take on Trump would've been quite accurate.
The Police had one job. Protect Oswald when they were moving him from the Department to the Jail where he would be "safe." They could not protect him for 15 seconds from the Elevator to 25 feet away to the Armored vehicle. Surrounded by 70 cops. Conspiracy? Uh, yeah. Killed by a concerned Dallas "nightclub" owner, who just wanted to save Jackie from the agony of watching a trial. Give me a break. He was Stalking Oswald for THREE DAYS in the Police Department. But in actuality, he CATERED the Assassination. No joke. He actually brought sandwiches, potato salad and celery tonic on Friday night for the police. He repeated that on Saturday for the Press Corps. (The press even had a nickname for Ruby. "The Creep.") He was in the room when Oswald was presented to the world. He was in the room when he corrected D.A. Wade as to the name of the "Fair Play for Cuba Committee." D.A. Wade pretended later not to know Ruby, but he was a regular customer of the Carousel Club and drank there FOR FREE.
it is crazy that anyone ever thought anyone would buy that story . about his concern for JAckie and having to endure a trial - how would you even repeat that ?
@@pjpredhomme7699 It is one of the 3 pillars of the Warren Report. I totally agree with you. Ruby just wanted people to believe he wasn't the mob, until he realized at the end that Mob had no love for him either, and in walks Dr. Jolly stage left.
I remember every minute of that day. Nothing made sense. I was in a psychic "premonition" state of mind for several months BEFORE the violent catastrophe on 11/22/63 because I saw an article in "Look" or "Life" Magazine (can't remember which?) about someone taking a shot at General Walker months before. I thought that was so odd? WHY was THAT a NATIONAL STORY? Why was I supposed to be concerned about that in TX with me in PA? It stuck out like a sore thumb ... looks like it was a psychological setup. Has anyone ever investigated who placed that article months in advance?
The alphabet BOYS placed that article in THE national news so they could later establish their narrative that THAT Oswald did a fake assassination!!! The Zapruder and "Ruby shot Oswald" films were about as real as the "moon landing" narrative!!!!!!!
All bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle. Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet, and ergo, from behind. Kennedy is clearly seen to suffer a massive exit wound exploding at the temple, consistent only with a shot from behind. Connally's said the shots came from behind. Autopsy shows the shots came from behind. Parkland doctors had no particular problem with the autopsy photos demonstrating the shots came from behind. Witnesses directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead. Those witnesses had a clear view behind the knoll fence and would plainly have seen any gunman there. Zapruder's secretary was only yards away from the fence and heard and saw nobody there. It's utterly implausible anybody would ever assume they would frame this on a lone shooter while firing from multiple directions.
The man who created the American book of espionage and ran the CIA for the longest time, and who was a member of one of the entrenched Washington DC families from way back and who had a family member in several president's cabinets was who I believe planned and choreographed the assassination of JFK, and there's film footage of LBJ leaving love field and a car backfires on the freeway by Love Field and he is the only one that ducks and it happened several times and then there's the film footage of him on air force one and the look that one of his cronies gave him when he was sworn in is blatantly suggestive of treasonous acts, the footage of George H.W. Bush leaving the school book depository on the morning of the assassination is also very suggestive of treasonous acts, and the other facts that everyone knows, and the fact that Latin American countries were of paramount interests to the CIA because the law firm that handled several clients who's business interests were largely invested in Latin America and the government that had been taken over and a puppet regime installed, one that was pro American
What "JFK assasination"??? If you realy think about it all we have is a blatantley doctored zapruda film and obviously phony film footage outside the "hospital!!! the alphabet boys kidnapped JFK and switched him for CIA operative jd Tippit. the rest is history and this countree has been going down hil ever since just look at 911!!! and the covid narrative!!!!
Explain how a man who was in a 4 floor of book storage building was saw drinking a soda one minute after Kennedy was shoot This person went to a movie theater ( no one knows who shot Kennedy at this time)sit down and watching movie a police man walked in movie walked up to a man who they don’t know he is says not a word pulls out a revolver and try to shoot some one they don’t know the would be victim grabbed the pistol snd gun did not shoot taken from cop and what’s killed by some one they did not know and left movie theater who they did not know left the area ( how did the cop know who to kill at this time line no one knew killed Kennedy)
He was arrested on suspicion of killing police officer J.D. Tippit. Oswald had been reported on a phone call to police going into the theater after acting like he was hiding from police vehicles rushing by with sirens wailing heading to the scene of Tippit’s shooting.
The story about the cops' chance meeting with Oswald at the soda machine on the bottom floor. and Roy Truly explaining that "yes, he works here" is always held up to vouch for either 1) that Oswald could not have been involved (because the encounter happened too soon after the shots and yet he is completely unfazed) or 2) that Oswald was SO coldblooded that he could fire his shots, kill JFK and then rush down five flights of stairs to get a soda, not out of breath and not even reacting when a cop waved a gun at him... In reality, the story sounds too good to be true, and it's quite possible that it was made up afterwards by Truly and some people from the Dallas police, to provide an excuse for how Oswald could be on the scene, supposedly kill the president - and yet not get caught when the police rushed into the building a minute later.
@@DavidFeldman Thanks for confirming your bias, which is something I detected within 2 minutes of your video, but now you have broadcast to all readers that it even extends to countries!
Johnson was worth 3 million when he took office from Kennedy. He was worth 27 million when he left office on January 20, 1969 a little over five years later
@@jimstone2286 Have mercy Jim! No one *dares* take on someone who knows more epidemiology after just a few days of internet research than trained "experts" learn in a lifetime. We may be dumb but we ain't stupid 😉
@@stayclean777 it's not about research or epidemiology or any of that. I was told to believe that I should take the shot and I didn't. Whether that's a good thing or a bad thing is irrelevant. I was told to believe something and I didn't. That's all it's I was told to believe something and I don't believe. Don't tell me I only believe what I'm told to believe. Tell it to the Sheep in line for
The problem with Oligarchy in a Democracy is that the serfs often times pass laws for the oligarchs that can be used against them by others, especially when that Democracy has only a two party system.😂
Its absurd...all previous assassins and future assassins made no bones about it, the one who denied it, thats the one who's silenced...ask yourself, did Oswald think he was going to get away with it by hiding his rifle on the sixth floor, then he would have this dirty little secret ?? Its ridiculous on the face of it....but that question somehow never gets asked...
Complete double talk about what is true and what is not. You sir are an insult to those who can really discern right from wrong. And nothing nor any true conclusion can be drawn without it. Mostly all those posting to your you site here are exhibiting nothing but the emotion of the Loss of Kennedy. simple sentimentality is not related to the facts of what actually happen. How you don't see the fallacy of injecting anything about Trump or present day politics is simply astounding and just Mickey Mouse logic.
I like bob Dylan, but you gotta know for a fact he doesn't know sh*t about the JFK case; he's just going by the fashionable tendency to believe in silly boogey men.
@@stddisclaimer8020 Which reminds me: when blind people are out with their dogs, we shouldn't criticize them if they don't pick pick up after them. They would, it's just that they can't see sh*t.
It's "too large and too intrusive into our lives" only as a platitude. Almost everyone who would give thumbs up to your statement also wants their Social Security, their FHA-backed mortgage, their Medicare, aid to schools and libraries, their Interstate highways, the agricultural price supports for their grocery foods -- and about 99 percent who say the federal government is too large supported the Iraq War, the holding of prisoners at Guantanamo, and maintaining nuclear arms. But oh, do they think the government is too large!
They built a lot of prisons in the 1990s it's time to put them to work. Adults that forgotten the rules can work at one of the finest penitentiarys this country has to offer. Working for 40 cents a day😮
That's because Clay Shaw (Bertrand) was a CIA operative running a front operation trading company in NOLA. Shaw also knew Oswald, Ferrie, and Banister along with some key Cuban exiles.
@@jeffallcock4561, I would respectfully disagree. Many a' criminals have been convicted on circumstantial evidence. There is also guilt by association.
@@gpiano88 Guilt by association isn't a chargeable offense. It's possible Shaw heard of Ferrie and Banister thru the grapevine, but that doesn't prove a connection. Nor is there any credible evidence Shaw knew Oswald, let alone plotted with him to assassinate JFK.
This is a rare, mistaken opinion by David...too much generalization, not enough logical, informed commentary. Mort Saul was just another pro-conspiracy person, who based his conclusions on opinion, not facts.
AOC, right on as usual! Some of the Cyclopians are among her so-called "colleagues", hateful cretins who have no rightful place in government, nor frankly, *anywhere*!
It’s interesting someone would speak for a spell and say nothing. I imagine your show doesn’t do well either. About 5-6 years ago, a movie was made. I didn’t make the 5-hour round trip to watch it. It may have been called, “I shot JFK.” This man, perhaps he was former mobster, knew exact makings of the cases found at the assassination’s scene. No one, not one person would have know, except the shooter. If you haven’t seen that movie, or interviews with this dude, I would wonder, “Who exactly doesn’t educate oneself”. Just sayin’.
The spoken word has become as impactful and powerful as only print used to be. Now anyone with an opinion who has a podcast can with their speech be just as valid, to some people, as an article in the New York Time, Washington Post, etc. Regardless of the shortcomings of the aforementioned news papers they still do fact checking and are subject libel laws by which their content is restrained to a certain degree. As Kellyanne Conway famously claimed that her alternate facts were just as valid as those other facts, you know the real facts!
Yes, apparently the whole Kennedy assassination is a big free-for-all where objective truth does not exist; anyone's "narrative" is just as valid as any other "narrative".
1st Amendment! You don't like it? Then you don't belong here! Go find a nation you love! If we censored lies in America, the left would have NOTHING left to say!
The libel laws provide no assurance of honest reporting. All that the libel laws do is to provide people who have been libeled (as opposed to slandered) against words which have been harmful to them. Harmful does not mean hurtful to one's feelings but having caused financial loss or damage. Moreover, if the allegedly libelous words are written without it being established that they were intended without malice, the chances of a successful libel suit are slim.
we all have known for years after we did 9-11 and had the list of patsies all lined up it all made sense. this country isn't the one we sang about as kids . now we are old those who remember that day in 1963. we believed the story as children all wide-eyed and innocent . now we know what time it is and how evil this country is Babylon. we do human sacrifice and worse, we are owned by our masters some aware some who care. we all bow before the ones who own us, thanks to my master he tells me what time it is. many are called few chosen.
@@DavidFeldman I second that statement, Sir! Please see my above comment about the "Look" or "Life" article about the shot take at General Walker ... months in advance ... as somehow a "National Story" of interest! So odd?
Duh, Oswald did it! Get over it by reading Parkland by Vincent Bugliosi or Case Closed by Gerald Posner; you will learn that Oswald did it! Yes! When is this conspiracy CRAP ever going to die? 😢
With the advantage of nearly 60 years of retrospective analysis, the entire era and the aftermath would have been completely different if the policies of the administration, regarding Cuba, had been far more favorable to American interests, the Monroe doctrine had been enforced, and Russia had been prevented from setting foot on Cuban soil. The strategic interest respecting Cuba was far more important than the implications of Viet Nam, which, in retrospect, have been a total waste. America's interventionist policies over the past 63 years have produced, ironically, little more than multitudes of refugees and immigrants from the countries in which those policies have, utterly, failed. They represent the shortsightedness and corruption of personal interests on the part of politicians who have had no vision for the country, based on the historical values and beliefs of the founders.
I'm not sure what is verboten but I think everyone should be able to read 'BLOOD MONEY POWER' by Barr McClellan. The same oil monied Guy who bought LBJ's ranch back from the same bankruptcy court also owned the TEXAS SCHOOL BOOK DEPOSITORY BUILDING. LBJ- STARTED TO GRAB JACKIE'S ASS & TRY TO KISS HER ON THE LIPS 3 DAYS AFTER SHE BURIED HER HUSBAND. 'BLOOD MONEY POWER'- Barr McClellan - LBJ's last private lawyer for the last 9 years of his life.
I'm not a Republican. Born and bred Democrat. Kennedy died the day after my birthday. I cried my eyes out. I watched Oswald shot on live tv. Kennedys death doesn't have anything to do with Trump.
I was born nonpartisan myself. The brainwashing in your case evidently started very early in your case.
My sister shares a birthday with you. 1963 though. 😞
No. But it certainly had everything to do w/the CIA. And that's WAY beyond theory.
My birthday is 9/11.
Kennedy was probably murdered by rogue right wingers who bitterly opposed his peace making efforts. Aren’t all the top bankers Republicans?
I was a senior in High School that day in class. It was a heartbreaking day for much of the country when Kennedy was shot!
The day democracy died.
I was a senior too, and I happened to hear it over the school intercom system. It was noon, and everyone was outside at lunchtime. No one believed me when I told them. I was not surprised it happened. Johnson and Kennedy hated each other, and I thought to myself with is Kennedy going to Texas to campaign. It was like a slap in the face of Johnson when Kennedy was having Johnson's best friend, Billy Saul Estes investigated.
@@ronwinkles2601 There is evidence LBJ knew about the plan to kill JFK. (Lying Lyndon even ducks down in his seat a few seconds before the shots begin!) But it's not likely he was in on the planning. That was done by GHW Bush.
@@ronwinkles2601 Billie Sol Estes, another corrupt con man along with Bobby Baker and LBJ. A.G. Robert Kennedy was having LBJ investigated, with the Senate close to finishing its work in making ethics and bribery accusations, and LIFE magazine about to release its findings on LBJs crooked, bribery actions the next week after Nov. 22 but.scrubbed it because he was now #36. Pres. Kennedy had already told his secretary Evelyn Lincoln (she put their conversation in her memoirs-book, documenting it) after she ssked about LBJ on Wed. Nov. 20, with, his reply, 'No, it will not be Lyndon. I'm thinking of Gov. Terry Sanford." From NC, who was a moderate on civil rights. Kennedy's real first VP pick in '60 was NOT LBJ, but Sen. Stuart Symington (D-MO), a defense hawk. LBJ-J.E. Hoover blackmailed Kennedy to pick the Sen. Majority Leader. Bobby Baker, LBJs Secretary to the Senate, said LBJ had planned his takeover since July 1960, when he got to be the VP nominee, and he knew LBJs corrupt and power-hungry mentality the best, as also in on the bribery (kickbacks) along with LBJ.! This proved LBJ planned to have Kennedy murdered before his term ended, when it could be arranged, and the trip to Texas was the place where LBJ and his cohorts (Ed Clark, LBJs financier) had the power to control the events both during and after the murder with the cover-up. Estes and Baker were indicted, convicted, and jailed. LBJ became president, never suffered any legal penalties, but he was a mental wreck, a sociopath, alcoholic, corrupt blackmailer and kickback (bribery on key legislation his entire Congress and VP career) artist.
@@dougiesherwin9591 Indeed.
The Warren Report was a theory, and a very poor one at that.
I believe it was not a theory but a blatant coverup. You have to remember that back then, we didn't have access to information like today. Alan Dulles was a traitorous Right-wing criminal. There's a great book called "The Devils Chessboard" by David Talbot. It is an eye opening insight into how much influence the Dulles brothers had on the shaping of our nation before and after Kennedy. The Dulles bros were NAZI sympathizers if not outright collaborators. check it out!
Like the 911 Committee set to fail. No accountability or jailed. Bush and Cheney ignored testifying under oath and go away with it. Clintons didn't. Republicans do since they are usually guilty since Nixon. Eisenhower our last good Republican president.
Dallas PD got it right.
A deep state contrivance peddled as truth to gull the public.
The Warren Report - and I can tell you're obviously not the least bit acquainted with it - was an extremely detailed (maybe too much) investigation that basically got it right. There were some flaws, naturally - no snickering here from anyone who who doesn't know sh&t about it - but they basically got it right, for sure.
The best way to prove Kennedy was a victim of a conspiracy is to prove Oswald innocent.. A fair trial could have done that ,and that is why Oswald wasn't permitted to live to stand trial.
@larryacks6544 You use sophistry and warped logic to reach a faulty conclusion.
Oswald was silenced before he could spill the beans.
He said he didn’t kill anyone. He begged for a lawyer. Instead, he was murdered by Ruby, who was in so deep with the mafia that he couldn’t see his feet.
He made no attempt to "spill the beans" to ANY cop during hours of interrogation, to any member of his family, to the President of the Dallas Bar Association, or to a live TV audience of millions. Instead he lied to police, refused to cooperate with any investigator, acted so smug and placid he even convinced his own brother he was guilty, and just shrugged a hollow, unsurprised, rambling reply when asked on live TV, "Did you shoot the President?"
@@nbenefiel H Louis Nichols, President of the Dallas Bar Association, who you can easily look up being interviewed on live TV, visited Oswald on the Saturday (AFTER Oswald made his public request for somebody to come forward and represent him), to learn whether Oswald's rights were being violated... and Oswald assured him they were not, turned down his offers of help, and sent him packing pending learning whether he could get his first choice, a lawyer he'd never even met living in another state who specialized in left-wing causes.
Oswald wasn’t supposed to get out of the building. His flight showed pure spy craft. They were waiting for him to flee the theatre. Locked and loaded.
For sure, all of this, folks!! We can now assume the obvious to be the truth! Eh. BTW, I was watching the Z-film again and right after the headshot(s), and as Jackie looks up and sees John’s scalp hanging off to the right off his head, she reaches to the back-right of JFK’s head with her fingers and wipes, messes the area with her right hand! Then as she is almost standing on her way to reach onto the trunk, she does it again, with her left hand fingers. Gives that area some finger attention. That apparently is the spot where the piece on the trunk came from. Of course that area we are told nothing about in the snofficial report!
I was an Expert in The Army Airborne and could not make that shot
A Marksman is Lowest for Weapons Patsy
I admit, that having done some "research" I have no idea what the Kennedy truth is,
But, being a registered Independent (in 5 states over last 50 years) I resent when ANYBODY uses a political PARTY to push their personal agenda. BOTH sides do it!
I remember the day, the time, where I was, how I reacted, and how America reacted. Utter shock and grief.
Brain.matter was splattered on the Dallas Police motorcycles behind the limousine. The fatal head shot came from the front.
Ballistics says you're wrong
@@radar0412 The poster and the motorcycle cop, riding to the left and behind Jackie, who got hit with the blood and brain matter so strongly, he said he thought he got shot, prove you are wrong! No accurate ballistics evidence support your misguided idea. None! The WC lied and lied, and then lied some more, to cover the inside job it was; including the corrupt, bi-polar, scheming man who lusted for the presidency ever since he told his school kid friends at school he would be president one day. He was then 10,, and he was the VP, who became #36.
@@radar0412 Not really. Planted "evidence" and physics say you're wrong.
@@hiramnoone Exactly who planted the evidence? This is the part where you start lying.
@@radar0412 Trump, I suppose. Who in fact kidnapped the Lindbergh baby and also killed the dinosaurs.
If you don't believe that now, I'm sure you could easily be convinced.
The best way to hide the truth is to surround it with a bunch of lies !!!!
According to the Parkland doctors have always insisted that the head shot came from the front. They were the first to see him, so they should know. The Bethesda autopsy docs had never done a gunshot victim before. Dr. Wecht says that all the top forensic doctors in the country were waiting to be called but they never were.
Parkland doctors at their first live press conference are speculating wildly about the wounds, unable to conjecture about numbers, directions, etc. They were concerned with trying to save Kennedy's life, they were not conducting an autopsy.
They looked at the autopsy photos for TV and had no particular problem with them.
That lying sack Wecht firmly reported the evidence shows the shots came from behind before he started cashing in a a conspiracy champion.
Dr. Malcolm Perry, the very first doc to tend to him, said in his report, the wound was in his THROAT, just below his Adam's Apple, right where Perry could insert his tracheostomy tube to help the breathing. That small round wound also came from the FRONT, again proving a conspiracy because the patsy was supposedly shooting from behind. So, not only was there another proven shooter, but the patsy also told the truth when he DENIED shooting anyone that day! No proof he did, but passing the Dallas PD nitrate test for gunshot residue that same afternoon proves beyond doubt, he shot no gun that day. His last test in the Marines was in May 1959 to a very lowly 191, barely over the 190 lowest-level "marksman" label. A real sniper-hired assassin would have had a recent test at 210, "sharpshooter" level, or the highest, 220 "expert" level. A test 4 1/2 years before, and no practicing since, again shows the fraud that was the cover-up WCR against the scapegoat!
The taped I see you could see he war shot from the front
@@RoseBud-fk4qg Kennedy is very clearly seen to suffer a massive exit wound exploding at the right temple in Zapruder's film consistent only with a shot from behind.
This was just the beginning of the government becoming one of the world's worst tyrannical communist governments, the second amendment was to protect us from the communist invasion we now face, Eisenhower signed into law in 1954 the Anti Communist Act Making any communist collusion a criminal offense, now congress is full of communist and neither party objected.
David, I'm with you. I'm 72 and I agree with your insight. I'll never forget that day. I'll never forget Walter Concrite announcing the horrific news and being openly emotional.
Teaser Title - he says nothing about "The Kennedy Assassination: What We Know Now"
It appears that Mr. Feldman actually has no idea about what happened to Kennedy and just uses the topic as a ruse for his spewing out his political bias. Talk about someone that's incapable of doing the homework! He should first look in the mirror.
Mr. Feldman kinda got ya with that heart symbol he posted to your accusation.
I agree with that Mr. Feldman went on a tangent. My question for you is, why do Conservatives easily fall for nonsensical fake news?
Do you somehow think that I’m a Conservative because I can see the forest from the trees? Talk about being nonsensical. Go take a look in the mirror!
Do you somehow think that I’m a Conservative because I can see the forest from the trees? Talk about being nonsensical. Go take a look in the mirror!
Do you somehow think that I’m a Conservative because I can see the forest from the trees? Talk about being nonsensical. Go take a look in the mirror!
We all "saw oswald get shot" but we did not see Kennedy get shot until the Z (doctored) film appeared in 1975.
Spot on! That we "saw Oswald get shot" video is about as real as the "moon landing"! 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@@peterfraser9070 If you were alive when it happened, you saw both Kennedy and Oswald get shot in real time. I saw it in real time & it happened as reported!
There are other words for conspiracy theory. It's called the unspeakable truth
You are calling a theory proof.
@@peterfraser9070 Wrong. He's referring to clear evidence, about which the waters are deliberately muddied, if it's not swept entirely under the rug.
@@peterfraser9070 So is the Oswald nonsense! Too many discrepancies, and half-truths to make it that simple!
@@freeguy77 Are you able to cite any of these discrepancies or half-truths?
@@ggalaxy9065 "Clear evidence"? Examples, please
My conspiracy theory; this is propaganda.
You do not hear it much but one true fact is that Lee Harvey Oswald Killed a Dallas P.o. in a theater prior to being apprehended why?
The surgeons at Parkland Memorial told us what happened. All six of them who were there that day said the fatal shot came from the front. At the time the Secret Service threatened them to keep quiet. But they spoke up long after that day. So there is no question that there was more than one shooter. Therefore it was a conspiracy.
Absolutely - I have seen multiple witnesses attest to this - the medical team initially started answering - about fatal shot from the front and were then - instructed that was NOT what they found
READ THIS >> People believe Ruby had to deposit some money to a stripper, that's why Ruby was at the police station at that time. How ? Because the 'police" found the receipt in Rubys pocket ? Along with Oswald's bus receipt (and didn't escape the scene in a car like another officer stated) because "police" stated he had a "time stamped bus receipt" right. But why do people believe those 2 versions yet people don't believe other "police" versions. Ruby wasn't depositing money to a stripper at the exact time the most protected prisoner in history Lee Harvey Oswald was being moved through a protected police basement to another prison. The same guy Ruby was supposed to kill coming out of the depository that Friday after shooting JFK (and be hailed a hero) !! But why do people believe those 2 versions? Simply because of 2 ticket stubs ? If you could just get hold of 2 ticket stubs you can change history and cover up the crime of the century. (,And those 2 ticket stubs, one from a money transfer the other an easily forged time stamped bus ticket with months to organize this evidence to produce to the Warren Commission and make it appear everything is legitimate and true. It was so easy covering up the crime of the century when it was done in the Vice Presidents backyard with him now the most powerful man in the world.
Food for Thought .....
More food for thought: as always, conspiracy theorists jump through hoops to let Oswald off the hook at every turn even if it requires that basically every person involved in the investigation was a lying traitor falsifying evidence.
@ShanefromSydneyAustralia When you flesh out these conspiracy theories, examine all the logical implications, they fall apart because there's no logic there at all. It's only a perverse pastime, a game played by the theorists, who while never having a speck of credible evidence implicating anyone else, pathologically carp over every piece of damning evidence against Oswald, flailing and ultimately failing in efforts to get their boy off the hook. But why they do it remains an open question, one we'll reserve for abnormal psychology,
"For there is nothing covered that shall not be revealed; neither hidden, that shall not be made known." - Jesus of Nazareth
Amen!!
The 700 lb gorilla in the room is why does NO ONE who pontificates on JFK ever press for his body to be exhumed for a proper autopsy!?!
It probably isn’t even his corpse in the grave!!
He was alive and on Maui in Hawiaii until a wildfire consumed him and left only ashes.
Oswald didn't fire a single shot that day. That's fact.
Who did? Checkmate.
@@radar0412 We don't know the names, but the nitrate test in LHO came back as a telltale NEGATIVE. So we know for sure it was NOT Oswald, along with frames #312-#330, 1 Sec, showing the BACKWARDS motion of Kennedy's body, proving the fatal shot was from the front! Why else do you think the Z-film was hidden from the public in its entirety until Mar. 6, 1975, almost 12 years later, on Geraldo Rivera's late-night tv show when he showed it to a stunned nationwide audience? His body flying backwards into his seat and left prove it could not be where the WC said he was, in the rear! That's all the proof you need to end the "lone nut" theory proposed by Arlen Specter, who made-up the ridiculous 1-shot-hits-two-men theory. John Connally, a rifle hunter disagreed with that loony theory, saying he was hit by a separate bullet, and believed that for the next 29 years of his life!
@@radar0412 Only chess doesn't work that way unless you can move the pieces around while the other guy goes to the can. Guilty till you prove otherwise -Nancy Belapelosi and the current partisan authoritarian topsy-turvy view of things.
@@radar0412 Mac Wallace was in the window of the TBD. Other shooters were on different roofs, and obviously someone was on the grassy knoll.
Checkmate indeed.
@@dougiesherwin9591 Name the person who identified Wallace in the TSBD window? You're a Dishonest person aren't you?
Draw all the conclusions you like. You'll never know for sure. The question is WHY we can't know!!!!
One thing I can promise you. You'll never see any physical evidence from either crime scene that didn't belong to Oswald for the rest of your life. You have my personal guarentee.
It was incredibly stupid to ride in a topless convertible Lincoln and somebody put the route in the newspaper the day before so it’s clear to me jfk was about to dismantle the CiA and someone up high green lit the hit.
I was a 17 year old kid, but I knew Kennedy was asking to be shot when he went to Texas. He was investigating Johnson's friends, devaluing the silver currency, putting up signs to CIA Headquarters,
failing the Chicago mob in their attempt to take back Cuba, and pissing off the Joint Chiefs of Staff on not continuing the Vietnam War. The writing was on the wall!
"somebody put the route in the newspaper the day before": on Tuesday, Nov. 19th, and riding in a convertible was common. What is clear is that you jump very easily to big conclusions.
“Could explain it” is not the same thing as “does explain it.”
Kennedy ordered the bubble top removed - there is a tape of it at the airport - it had stopped raining and he wanted to be seen as much as possible
I remember that day so well. When people heard Kennedy had died, there was such shock and some men and women cried openly. Remember Mort Sahl, too, but didnt know of his interest in this.
It's pretty obvious you work for the CIA are you on the payroll of CIA
Who pays you to perpetuate the Conspiracy Machine's narrative, shill??
David, I live in the Dallas region. I work part-time as a shuttle driver for one of the large car rental corporations. One of our locations just so happens to be in downtown Dallas, and so invariably as we leave we always pass that area of infamy. And every time David, Every time, I pick up this strange form of low energy that emanates from that area, this vibe, ( and no, I'm not delving into metaphysics here thank you very much ), it's the reality that an American President was murdered here. You see people from all over walking around the knoll, a store that sells memorabilia ( which I find ghoulish )... It's simply surreal.
If you should ever visit the book depository building, you can glance out the window where Oswald allegedly shot the president, and you may ponder as I did that day glancing out..." I'm not sure about this. Oswald was allegedly a very good marksman, but you still wonder.
Thank you, David
Peace.
If you go to Ford's theater in DC, you get a strange feeling too. And the acoustics make it even more mysterious.
Oswald's last known firing of a rifle was in his 2nd, and final Marines test in May 1959. That was 4 1/2 years before! He scored a sickly 191, barely making the lowest rank, marksman, needing 190. A sharpshooter is the middle level, where most sniper accuracy is needed, is at 210. The highest level is expert, needing 220. So, realizing the low level he was, and time elapsed without practicing since May 1959, proves he did no shooting, as does his testing for nitrates at the Dallas PD, when he had none on his hands, face, or clothes! Also, someone else shot the cop, J.D. Tippit, witnesses reported a short fat man who they saw, so it could not be LHO. It was a setup against him, as he knew, by denying any desire for publicity, and that he was just a Patsy, the fall guy, or scapegoat, while the real planners and professional shooters got off.
"Oswald allegedly shot the president": Those weren't paint balls coming out of his Carcano, so yeah, he shot Kennedy alright.
@@peterfraser9070 Never shot anyone that day. You haven't been keeping up with the facts after Nov. 24, 1963. At all! Witnesses on the 4th floor came down those stairs, heard or saw NOBODY! The 6th floor layout was a neat plant, to frame the man who DENIED doing it, so he did NOT want "publicity" as the story-government narrative goes! Oswald PASSED a nitrates (gunshot residue) test, proving he shot nobody, and that includes the J.D. Tippit murder!
"The Girl On The Stairs" (2013) by Barry Ernest, destroys the "6th floor" theory! The Z-film proves at #313 to 331 (1 sec.), Kennedy's body slammed BACKWARDS, proving a FRONT shot. Everything you have apparently read is only the one-sided fraud!
The discrepancies, lies, and half-truths prove the fraud on a "lone nut" when he was a patriot, an FBI Informant. They don't shoot people, they are patriots, and he was made the scapegoat, or PATSY in his immortal words.
Actually, Oswald was in a good Marchman. He was really poorly and Paul rifles in a long time and practice so if he did it, he got lucky but I don’t think so. I think there was others involved for what reason I don’t know Andrew I don’t know, but I’ve studied it since 1980 and there’s something weird extremely strange about what happened.
I worked with Mort Sahl at WRC Radio in 1978. He was the PM Drivetime host, and I produced the show that followed his. I would chat with him when he arrived to prepare for his show, and also would chat with his wife, China. who dropped him off at the radio station (an NBC O & O) on her way to the racetrack. Mort was entertaining, funny, but in a quick, topical way, not just a guy who cracked jokes. He called everyone, me included, "Pal," because he couldn't remember everyone's name. He got let go after about 6 months, not because he wasn't entertaining, but because the radio station spent nothing on promoting his show. We did chat a bit about the Kennedy assassination; I was 12 when it happened and had vivid recollection of the event, and he was interested in what I thought at the time it happened. I only wish now I 'd recorded our conversations for posterity. Had he lived long enough, I'm sure his take on Trump would've been quite accurate.
@philwood1020 Mort Sahl was a crackpot conspiracist who never met a plot, no matter how lame, he couldn't wholly embrace.
To accuse all Republicans of believing this nonsense is just incredibly stupid. It really is that simple.
The Police had one job. Protect Oswald when they were moving him from the Department to the Jail where he would be "safe." They could not protect him for 15 seconds from the Elevator to 25 feet away to the Armored vehicle. Surrounded by 70 cops. Conspiracy? Uh, yeah. Killed by a concerned Dallas "nightclub" owner, who just wanted to save Jackie from the agony of watching a trial. Give me a break. He was Stalking Oswald for THREE DAYS in the Police Department. But in actuality, he CATERED the Assassination. No joke. He actually brought sandwiches, potato salad and celery tonic on Friday night for the police. He repeated that on Saturday for the Press Corps. (The press even had a nickname for Ruby. "The Creep.") He was in the room when Oswald was presented to the world. He was in the room when he corrected D.A. Wade as to the name of the "Fair Play for Cuba Committee." D.A. Wade pretended later not to know Ruby, but he was a regular customer of the Carousel Club and drank there FOR FREE.
it is crazy that anyone ever thought anyone would buy that story . about his concern for JAckie and having to endure a trial - how would you even repeat that ?
@@pjpredhomme7699 It is one of the 3 pillars of the Warren Report. I totally agree with you. Ruby just wanted people to believe he wasn't the mob, until he realized at the end that Mob had no love for him either, and in walks Dr. Jolly stage left.
I remember every minute of that day. Nothing made sense. I was in a psychic "premonition" state of mind for several months BEFORE the violent catastrophe on 11/22/63 because I saw an article in "Look" or "Life" Magazine (can't remember which?) about someone taking a shot at General Walker months before. I thought that was so odd? WHY was THAT a NATIONAL STORY? Why was I supposed to be concerned about that in TX with me in PA? It stuck out like a sore thumb ... looks like it was a psychological setup. Has anyone ever investigated who placed that article months in advance?
The alphabet BOYS placed that article in THE national news so they could later establish their narrative that THAT Oswald did a fake assassination!!! The Zapruder and "Ruby shot Oswald" films were about as real as the "moon landing" narrative!!!!!!!
JFK was assassinated by more than one shooter.(One from the back, two from the side, and one final shot from the front) Oswald missed all his shots.
All bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle.
Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet, and ergo, from behind.
Kennedy is clearly seen to suffer a massive exit wound exploding at the temple, consistent only with a shot from behind.
Connally's said the shots came from behind.
Autopsy shows the shots came from behind.
Parkland doctors had no particular problem with the autopsy photos demonstrating the shots came from behind.
Witnesses directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead.
Those witnesses had a clear view behind the knoll fence and would plainly have seen any gunman there.
Zapruder's secretary was only yards away from the fence and heard and saw nobody there.
It's utterly implausible anybody would ever assume they would frame this on a lone shooter while firing from multiple directions.
YOU have missed all of your shots...for Distemper!
Trump does not know enough to resign? Spoken like a true Democrat! Or FBI official?
The man who created the American book of espionage and ran the CIA for the longest time, and who was a member of one of the entrenched Washington DC families from way back and who had a family member in several president's cabinets was who I believe planned and choreographed the assassination of JFK, and there's film footage of LBJ leaving love field and a car backfires on the freeway by Love Field and he is the only one that ducks and it happened several times and then there's the film footage of him on air force one and the look that one of his cronies gave him when he was sworn in is blatantly suggestive of treasonous acts, the footage of George H.W. Bush leaving the school book depository on the morning of the assassination is also very suggestive of treasonous acts, and the other facts that everyone knows, and the fact that Latin American countries were of paramount interests to the CIA because the law firm that handled several clients who's business interests were largely invested in Latin America and the government that had been taken over and a puppet regime installed, one that was pro American
What "JFK assasination"??? If you realy think about it all we have is a blatantley doctored zapruda film and obviously phony film footage outside the "hospital!!! the alphabet boys kidnapped JFK and switched him for CIA operative jd Tippit. the rest is history and this countree has been going down hil ever since just look at 911!!! and the covid narrative!!!!
lol
Did you take a breath while writing that
This is not necessarily about Kennedy. It is about what you were told then as it compares with what you are told now.
A podcast full of nothing about the JFK assassination 😳
about one half way, in and no information,....just blah, blah, blah....
The only accurate thing this guy said was at the beginning when he said JFK was assassinated on 11/22/63.
Explain how a man who was in a 4 floor of book storage building was saw drinking a soda one minute after Kennedy was shoot
This person went to a movie theater ( no one knows who shot Kennedy at this time)sit down and watching movie a police man walked in movie walked up to a man who they don’t know he is says not a word pulls out a revolver and try to shoot some one they don’t know the would be victim grabbed the pistol snd gun did not shoot taken from cop and what’s killed by some one they did not know and left movie theater who they did not know left the area ( how did the cop know who to kill at this time line no one knew killed Kennedy)
He was arrested on suspicion of killing police officer J.D. Tippit. Oswald had been reported on a phone call to police going into the theater after acting like he was hiding from police vehicles rushing by with sirens wailing heading to the scene of Tippit’s shooting.
The story about the cops' chance meeting with Oswald at the soda machine on the bottom floor. and Roy Truly explaining that "yes, he works here" is always held up to vouch for either 1) that Oswald could not have been involved (because the encounter happened too soon after the shots and yet he is completely unfazed) or 2) that Oswald was SO coldblooded that he could fire his shots, kill JFK and then rush down five flights of stairs to get a soda, not out of breath and not even reacting when a cop waved a gun at him...
In reality, the story sounds too good to be true, and it's quite possible that it was made up afterwards by Truly and some people from the Dallas police, to provide an excuse for how Oswald could be on the scene, supposedly kill the president - and yet not get caught when the police rushed into the building a minute later.
Adjust your meds.
@johndavis8626 You explain how you can't think, write or reason?
I am South African and stopped listening to this drivel after 2 minutes!
I’m American and I stopped reading your comment after South African
@@DavidFeldman Thanks for confirming your bias, which is something I detected within 2 minutes of your video, but now you have broadcast to all readers that it even extends to countries!
John James (re "drivel")
So?
@@johnjames6620
"Bias" , in and of itself, isn't necessarily wrong
Moreover, virtually no one is entirely free if it.
@@davegreene8588 I agree, excepting that bias can be wrong in many situations, like for a judge in a court case and so forth.
Wish this conversation was about the Kennedy assassination.
Nothing was ever the same again.
It was a Corp and MIC coup, with the usual ancillary players.
Who benefited ? (i.e. became President)
Johnson was worth 3 million when he took office from Kennedy. He was worth 27 million when he left office on January 20, 1969 a little over five years later
Were Andrew Johnson, Chester A Arthur, and Teddy Roosevelt in on those "hits" too?
By your logic, Nelson Rockefeller could be suspected of putting Sara Jane Moore up to shooting at Gerald Ford.
Who benefited? Bell Helicopter, based in Texas which provided the Hueys in Viertnam.
You surely enjoy that CIA Check you get every month.
how much does the Conspiracy Machine pay you to be a cog, shill??
A LOT OF WORDS THAT SAYS NOTING.
This was supposed to be about the Kennedy assassination, but turned out to be a rambling bla bla bla on mostly nothing. I vote NO.
If you disbelieve conspiracy theories does that make them less believable: I think not. Is not calling theories conspiracies itself a conspiracy?
Is this comment part of a conspiracy?
Posing under the cloak of disbelief does not amount to a refutation but to a mainly skeptical position, that is all it is, and it achieves nothing.
@@Goldenfawn ???
@@Goldenfawn Hmmmmm....interesting.
@@Goldenfawn
Right or wrong, it's inevitable in discourse.
"Republicans just believe what they're told to believe?"
Ok, how many booster shots have you had?
Because booster shots are phony or something?
The guy’s question makes no point.
@@brianarbenz1329 he knows what i meant but he lacks the intellect to take me on.
@@jimstone2286 Have mercy Jim! No one *dares* take on someone who knows more epidemiology after just a few days of internet research than trained "experts" learn in a lifetime. We may be dumb but we ain't stupid 😉
@@stayclean777 it's not about research or epidemiology or any of that. I was told to believe that I should take the shot and I didn't. Whether that's a good thing or a bad thing is irrelevant. I was told to believe something and I didn't. That's all it's I was told to believe something and I don't believe. Don't tell me I only believe what I'm told to believe. Tell it to the Sheep in line for
I lost my time listening to a content that has nothing todo with the title .
The problem with Oligarchy in a Democracy is that the serfs often times pass laws for the oligarchs that can be used against them by others, especially when that Democracy has only a two party system.😂
Truer words , were never spoken children have more of a sense of right and wrong then most so called grown - ups.
David I hope you never stop! Insightful, informative, innovative, fascinating and funny are just some of the positives I apply to your presentations!
Its absurd...all previous assassins and future assassins made no bones about it, the one who denied it, thats the one who's silenced...ask yourself, did Oswald think he was going to get away with it by hiding his rifle on the sixth floor, then he would have this dirty little secret ?? Its ridiculous on the face of it....but that question somehow never gets asked...
kill the man as his wife sat next to him on world TV and in broad daylight. what is the real message?
Not on TV! Read a book.
@@curbozerboomer1773 zapruder flim was nation wide stop gasslighting.
Complete double talk about what is true and what is not. You sir are an insult to those who can really discern right from wrong. And nothing nor any true conclusion can be drawn without it. Mostly all those posting to your you site here are exhibiting nothing but the emotion of the Loss of Kennedy. simple sentimentality is not related to the facts of what actually happen. How you don't see the fallacy of injecting anything about Trump or present day politics is simply astounding and just Mickey Mouse logic.
Thank you Bob Dylan for that wonderful powerful song Murder Most Foul.
I like bob Dylan, but you gotta know for a fact he doesn't know sh*t about the JFK case; he's just going by the fashionable tendency to believe in silly boogey men.
@@peterfraser9070 I have to differ. Dylan does indeed know "shit" about JFK conspiracies. But that's all he knows....
@@stddisclaimer8020 Which reminds me: when blind people are out with their dogs, we shouldn't criticize them if they don't pick pick up after them. They would, it's just that they can't see sh*t.
all the way with LBJ
The federal government is too large and is too intrusive into our lives.
Especially with the abortion issue.
It's "too large and too intrusive into our lives" only as a platitude. Almost everyone who would give thumbs up to your statement also wants their Social Security, their FHA-backed mortgage, their Medicare, aid to schools and libraries, their Interstate highways, the agricultural price supports for their grocery foods -- and about 99 percent who say the federal government is too large supported the Iraq War, the holding of prisoners at Guantanamo, and maintaining nuclear arms. But oh, do they think the government is too large!
Richard Belzers book Hit List about how every witness was killed even makes it more of a cover up
They built a lot of prisons in the 1990s it's time to put them to work. Adults that forgotten the rules can work at one of the finest penitentiarys this country has to offer. Working for 40 cents a day😮
We didn't see the Zapruder film until '68. Not widely until the mid 70's
who's we ? Geraldo first showed it on TV with Dick Gregory in 1975
This guy needs a check up.
Spot on analysis. David manages to articulate what I can only sense. 👍
Thanks Jamie, miss the long shows
@@DavidFeldman I enjoy the shorter ones, too. I can watch them in one sitting.
Talking head for radical
Left!!’ 👎🏼
Garrison turned up some fruitful links to the assassination, but I can never understand his Clay Shaw fixation.
That's because Clay Shaw (Bertrand) was a CIA operative running a front operation trading company in NOLA. Shaw also knew Oswald, Ferrie, and Banister along with some key Cuban exiles.
@@gpiano88 All of that is circumstantial.
@@jeffallcock4561, I would respectfully disagree. Many a' criminals have been convicted on circumstantial evidence. There is also guilt by association.
Garrison was pretty effed up. From what I have heard about Clay Shaw, he might have had a fixation on your last name.
@@gpiano88 Guilt by association isn't a chargeable offense. It's possible Shaw heard of Ferrie and Banister thru the grapevine, but that doesn't prove a connection. Nor is there any credible evidence Shaw knew Oswald, let alone plotted with him to assassinate JFK.
this guy is a lefty, disregard
You forgot the CIA, LBJ.,And a few others.
This guy needs a checkup.
This is a rare, mistaken opinion by David...too much generalization, not enough logical, informed commentary. Mort Saul was just another pro-conspiracy person, who based his conclusions on opinion, not facts.
Nothing burger
Everytime i heard pizzagate i got hungry and had one delivered
Gotta question for you; from NZ.
'Do you think Oswald acted alone'? and if so 'Do you think Sirhan acted alone'?
This was so right on man. You've got a new fan for sure!
"Terror is the cylopian herd lumbering toward us"
-AOC
Thanks Wayne
AOC, right on as usual!
Some of the Cyclopians are among her so-called "colleagues", hateful cretins who have no rightful place in government, nor frankly, *anywhere*!
Conspiracy theories as viewed by a conspiracy theorist ...
So, what do we know now?
Nothing in this video.
" Republiscum" is the correct spelling and pronunciation for the " GOP "
Totally agreed!
I've other such fitting names for our "friends across the aisle".
And "Demorat" is the correct spelling and pronunciation for the DNC. lol.
@@MGB18 democrap
@@hiramnoone: Democrap also. lol.
Dave! What happened to matching the content to your title?
It’s interesting someone would speak for a spell and say nothing. I imagine your show doesn’t do well either. About 5-6 years ago, a movie was made. I didn’t make the 5-hour round trip to watch it.
It may have been called, “I shot JFK.” This man, perhaps he was former mobster, knew exact makings of the cases found at the assassination’s scene. No one, not one person would have know, except the shooter. If you haven’t seen that movie, or interviews with this dude, I would wonder, “Who exactly doesn’t educate oneself”. Just sayin’.
Baloney! There are always D-bags who "confess" to famous crimes.
The spoken word has become as impactful and powerful as only print used to be. Now anyone with an opinion who has a podcast can with their speech be just as valid, to some people, as an article in the New York Time, Washington Post, etc. Regardless of the shortcomings of the aforementioned news papers they still do fact checking and are subject libel laws by which their content is restrained to a certain degree. As Kellyanne Conway famously claimed that her alternate facts were just as valid as those other facts, you know the real facts!
Yes, apparently the whole Kennedy assassination is a big free-for-all where objective truth does not exist; anyone's "narrative" is just as valid as any other "narrative".
1st Amendment! You don't like it? Then you don't belong here! Go find a nation you love! If we censored lies in America, the left would have NOTHING left to say!
The libel laws provide no assurance of honest reporting. All that the libel laws do is to provide people who have been libeled (as opposed to slandered) against words which have been harmful to them. Harmful does not mean hurtful to one's feelings but having caused financial loss or damage. Moreover, if the allegedly libelous words are written without it being established that they were intended without malice, the chances of a successful libel suit are slim.
Why do you shill for known criminals?
Yeah, Oswald should not be called innocent. That's so wrong.
Endless one-sided banter.
I think it might have started the troubled times of today. Could I be correct? Best Wishes. Sincerely, Tom
Mort was the man.
Slander
Mort was an independent thinker, and paid for it.
Hell yeah 👍👍👍
we all have known for years after we did 9-11 and had the list of patsies all lined up it all made sense. this country isn't the one we sang about as kids . now we are old those who remember that day in 1963. we believed the story as children all wide-eyed and innocent . now we know what time it is and how evil this country is Babylon. we do human sacrifice and worse, we are owned by our masters some aware some who care. we all bow before the ones who own us, thanks to my master he tells me what time it is. many are called few chosen.
One of your best monologues, man.
I’m glad someone believes that!
@@DavidFeldman I second that statement, Sir! Please see my above comment about the "Look" or "Life" article about the shot take at General Walker ... months in advance ... as somehow a "National Story" of interest! So odd?
Stop being the BEST !!!
Duh, Oswald did it!
Get over it by reading Parkland by Vincent Bugliosi or Case Closed by Gerald Posner; you will learn that Oswald did it! Yes! When is this conspiracy CRAP ever going to die? 😢
This Gentleman is full of SCAT!!!!!
Nixon did not resign because he knew right from wrong.
With the advantage of nearly 60 years of retrospective analysis, the entire era and the aftermath would have been completely different if the policies of the administration, regarding Cuba, had been far more favorable to American interests, the Monroe doctrine had been enforced, and Russia had been prevented from setting foot on Cuban soil. The strategic interest respecting Cuba was far more important than the implications of Viet Nam, which, in retrospect, have been a total waste. America's interventionist policies over the past 63 years have produced, ironically, little more than multitudes of refugees and immigrants from the countries in which those policies have, utterly, failed. They represent the shortsightedness and corruption of personal interests on the part of politicians who have had no vision for the country, based on the historical values and beliefs of the founders.
Be very carefuly what you think after this guy gave talk, I believe he is just building himself to sell books
Feldman is the biggest conspiracy theorist. Click bait.
Nonsense.
Read Stalin's Secret Agents by Evans.
Well done again David!
Very well said!
It was Thatcher.
Who didn't she kill?
@@SoccerPizza
Us, I guess.
I'm not sure what is verboten but I think everyone should be able to read 'BLOOD MONEY POWER' by Barr McClellan. The same oil monied Guy who bought LBJ's ranch back from the same bankruptcy court also owned the TEXAS SCHOOL BOOK DEPOSITORY BUILDING. LBJ- STARTED TO GRAB JACKIE'S ASS & TRY TO KISS HER ON THE LIPS 3 DAYS AFTER SHE BURIED HER HUSBAND. 'BLOOD MONEY POWER'- Barr McClellan - LBJ's last private lawyer for the last 9 years of his life.
JACKIE SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN STANDING NEXT TO JOHNSON WHEN HE TOOK OATH WITH THAT LOOK OF VICTORY ON HIS FACE.
The truth is the world and conspiracy in it do not exist...
back in the 60.s i heard that same phrase the strong don,t protect the weak??
Full of it
Anyone can have a Pod Cast, you are a FOOL!