Disney BLAMES THE AUDIENCE for "Wish" FLOPPING with such EMBARRASSING numbers?!
Vložit
- čas přidán 6. 09. 2024
- The First 100 people will get 60% OFF @Incogni with coupon code MIDNIGHT at incogni.com/mi...
Following The Marvels, Pixar’s Elemental and The Little Mermaid, Disney’s next big flop is the animated Wish - a movie which in a sense, celebrates Disney’s 100th anniversary, though there is very little to celebrate about how it is performing.
In this postmortem @AndreEinherjar will begin with a brief look at Disney’s most recent high profile flops, from Strange World to Wish, before exploring the revelations in the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and finally, what Disney should do with these revelations.
Buy our other Merch:
mixedtees.com/...
Please share, like, subscribe, and follow us on…
Facebook: Facebook.com/Groups/MidnightsEdge
Twitter: @Midnights_Edge
And support us here for cool extra features:
www.subscribes...
/ midnightsedge
We also welcome one-time Paypal donations at:
contact@midnightsedge.me
Send us stuff!
MIDNIGHT'S EDGE
(C/O Tom Connors)
PO Box 325
Hillsboro, WI 54634
ME Opening Vignette credits:
Visuals: Tomas Stavik - / tommygunfeth
Music: Doydank - / doydank
Music:
Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 License
creativecommons....
FAIR USE NOTICE. Midnight’s Edge videos might contain copyrighted material, the use of which may not always be specifically authorized by the copyright owner. In such cases, the material is displayed for commentary and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this video for purposes of your own, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
#Disney #Wish #Marvel
The First 100 people will get 60% OFF @Incogni with coupon code MIDNIGHT at incogni.com/midnight
Can anyone clear something up for me : "Is the female protagonist actually a princess?"
Hi André, I tried to subscribe but they won't let me subscribe because I live in Australia
Discount being offered is only 20% off
How do disney, Sony (standard oil of new york), et alia have the money to do so much evil? YOU gave it to them.
Gather on ME!
Listen to Prem Rawat!
Did you use our link? incogni.com/midnight@@normanrusty
Disney can blame who ever they want. No one cares anymore.
Very true
True, we just love the ME analysis
Exactly what I was just about to write. You saved me the time
"Could we be so out of touch? No, it's the audience who are wrong!"
And that right there, is all there is to it.
Does Disney not realize that it is their responsibility to make movies the audience wants, and not the audiences responsibility to like the movies Disney makes?
Disney’s executives are delusional.
There needs to be a change in Disney’s management.
no.
Disney #1 responsibility is to please it's shareholders.
And the 3 main shareholder's (research it worth your time) owns 422 of the Fortunes 500 companies, 82%.
They make so much money hands over fist in their other investment, losing 1 or 2 billions to push the woke agenda is pocket change for them.
They are setting the stage for the world to degenerate in order to welcome the Antichrist.
@Renlang I just commented shouldn't they be catering to their audience, before reading your comment!
@@thunberbolttwo3953 go cry about it shill
Yes the audience is entitled, it’s their money, they’re entitled to spend how they want. That’s your problem not theirs.
Damn right.
That would not have been the case under a Hillary Clinton administration; part of the agenda of a Hillary Clinton presidency was to be a huge subsidy for Hollywood, funded by the taxpayers. TV and movies would be funded by the government, without all the need to worry about audience, you would pay for movies and TV whether you liked it, or not, whether you watched it or not. attendance or TV ratings.
Bob Eiger would love that. Incidentally, Iger was going to run for president in 2020.
Exactly. Disney might consider making products that people want to pay for - as long as they are making trash that no one wants, sales will not be successful.
Omg no way? Another entertainment company blaming anyone but themselves for bad numbers? I'm shocked, truly.
Very similar behavior to certain presidential candidate that are indeed politically aligned with modern Disney's.
@@rashidisw no, Bob Iger isn’t running for president in 2024, though he was going to in 2020. Disney has close ties with the Biden administration.
@@rashidiswwhat you mean the one and his cult who blame everything up to and including aliens because they lost?
"Am I so out of touch? No, it's the audience who are wrong!" -Disney
Ironically, the fall of Disney is best summarized by a quote from something they own
@EternityKingdomsHeadHoncho by something they purchased and had no hand in creating or developing. There is poetry to that
Audiences aren't even "Hate Watching" anymore. They pushed people to stop caring. A feat considering how many generations Disney had of watchers
If things cost money.. like streaming subscriptions, or Movie tickets... then unless you like BDSM why would you want to pay someone to abuse you ?
Doubly so for any Straight Males or people sympathetic to them.
I've never hate-watched anything in my life, and I don't understand why people would pay to be miserable for two hours.
Closest I've come is completionist-watching, but that doesn't cover corporate hatefiction from people who hate me and hate the franchise. Also, giving things that I expect to hate a chance, which I don't do often and almost always regret.
Wish is that kind of movie that not good enough to attract happy audiences, but also not bad enough to lure "haters". Very mediocre, and bound to be quickly forgotten.
Like, remember Raya?
Nothing more deadly for a business than indifference. Because this means people aren't even thinking about you.
@@GutsofEclipse There is "so bad it's Good" type of things. Where it's so bad it's funny, I especially got into that watching Mystery Science 3000 with my mom growing up. But I think a lot of the "hate watching" is people deluded into thinking you can't have an opinion if you don't watch it.
So they watch things just to argue about it online. But then they forget the people they are arguing with won't listen to them anyways so it's pointless.
The golden rule of business is: give people what they want. Anyone can tell you that customers won't buy what they don't want and no amount of guilt tripping, gaslighting, and complaining will change that.
I have a mantra I live by when I create art: The fan base dictate the product. You diss the fans, you are finished. Point blank. Your work is never greater than the reception that the fans give you for it
People just don't care anymore. We expect every movie to be bad and we expect to be called racist when it fails. Couldn't care less anymore
It is the audience's fault. That's how boycotts work. The audience doesn't consume their product, and they lose money. So I'm happy to take the blame in that sense.
It is not a boycott, because Disney is creating delusional crap work that only the cultists delusional loves to watch.
Socialist operate on the delusion that their message is popular without regards reality. Bob Iger is a champagne socialist and as long as he’s getting THE MESSAGE out there, he’s happy. He’s got his millions, his mansion and his yacht.
I'm not even certain it is a boycott, although that is a part of it, I think customers just don't like the product. If I buy a car and it falls apart, I won't buy another from that company.
@@normsti000he's saying people should've boycotted before Disney released duds such as that BIPOC only journey movie. There were products labeled as politically motivated messaging before 2020 ended.
Even my 70 year old mother asked me recently why movies seem to be getting worse and worse.
Blaming only works on people who care. They thought escalating anger would not hurt them because most of that anger was toothless. But when you punish people enough, they become numb to the pain and start ignoring your taunts and jests... Death by apathy is a bloodless but still devastating way to destroy someone who stands against you. You stop giving them attention and they realize how actually useless they are to your existence and it crushes their ego.
Yes. I haven't given Disney a single dime for some years, now. If they want my money, they will have to earn my interest back. For the moment, I just don't care.
Hey Disney: We don't want you to have "social goals", we just want compelling entertainment made by competent people. What ever happened to that business model?
The Depopulators Club is in charge imo. To continue Profit growth you need the population to increase -not decrease. When the birth rate fell under replacement levels ..they knew profit would disappear ..so the attempt to renovate the culture began imo. And like all poorly planned renovations it has turned into a clusterfork that will end up as a cultural eyesore,incomplete and abandoned,covered in graffiti-imo.
If their ESG scores aren’t good enough, Blackrock and Vanguard won’t give them investment money.
The Bob Iger Company is crying about us not buying their trash? 😅😂
it's fink's, not iger's
Disney really thought people would swallow whatever they made.
"There's nobody left at the company who knows how to tell stories. This is obviously the audience's fault."
Disney overused the blame card that we don't care anymore
It doesn't really matter who they blame at this point. When we were having this conversation in 2021 the fear was that they'd drive half their audience to apathy if they couldn't course correct. And that's where we are.
We reached 85% audience apathy. The train has left the station.
Instead of making products for the audience in front of them, they're making products for an audience they idealistically believe should be there.
Disney is making themselves are martyr for a horrible cause. They just need to stop.
How is it that most Disney movies released in 90 years are still watched, but they can no longer do it? Can it be that they have abandoned the universal rules of storytelling?
This era of Disney will go down in history, for all the wrong reasons. As they like to say, "A cautionary tale." 😂
The tale has been told before, SEARS failed to understand its market and lost its Commercial Empire to Walmart, KODAK failed to understand the value of its Intellectual Property and it was appropriated by Microsoft, and now we see it with Hollywood (Disney is merely a mouthpiece for Hollywood) it fails to entertain and other Entertainment Companies step into the gap.
They need to understand that popular entertainment is a poor vehicle for propaganda because consumers see it for what it is and go elsewhere.
This will be taught in business schools as an example of what not to do.
And IGER’s picture will be in that as well.
@@ito2789Nah , if anything, CHAPEKS short reign as CEO pummeled Disneys brand further, He should be in that picture 😂
@@JoshuaG iger was the architect of it all, Chapek was the temporary fall guy but now everyone knows it was always Iger.
"Am i out of touch? No, its the fans who are out of touch" bob Iger
We changed preferences when they changed preferences.
Disney is targeting modern audiences
therefore Disney's problem is audience tastes are not changing
I'm starting to think the "modern audience" is just a myth, an imaginary friend that only exists for the "creatives" behind these projects. Think about it . . .
The modern audience wants more visual human "diversity," prefers LGBT couples and ignores/despises heterosexual couples, wants Mary Sue and Karen women leading genres that normally male lead, enjoy being Lectured to about how women have it worse than men and how awful men are, that any thing can be a mantle, and as long as a character or historical figure being race swapped is going darker is fine or better simply because the character is darker even if historically or lore wise it doesn't make sense, history and lore don't matter anyway or basic logic for that matter, and dozens of other things that they apparently want to exist, but don't support or too small in number to support.
Does anyone else remember the 80's and 90's where we had character that were both visually and personality wise diverse? Has anyone seen the sales for romances novels, specifically heterosexual romances? Or noticed that most women don't want to watch other women that looked and "act like men"? Does anyone actually enjoy being Lectured to?
Essentially they are targeting paper dolls.
@@greenliongirl07 "No sir! I did not see you playing with your dolls, sir!"
@@greenliongirl07 I think this is based in part on materialism, the philosophy that anything we can’t measure is not real, that consciousness is an illusion, and you don’t have a mind, only a brain, a meat computer. Therefore you are a meat robot and you can only respond to another meat robot of your same make, model, vintage, and orientation. Representation is essential for recognition. Additionally, a narrative that is not diverse is rejected as containing a check sum error: incomplete representation, therefore invalid.
@@greenliongirl07 I’m all for representation but not at the expense of the story or existing characters
@@simsgirlgem Agreed. The bad thing is for every character that gets raceswapped, genderswapped or turned gay or suddenly bi, there are other characters that already fit the label and you can always create new ones.
I think it's coming to a point when Disney could make the best film in the world and it would still bomb because it has Disney's name on it. Disney's brand has become toxic.
The more damaged the brand becomes, the longer it'll take to turn it around.
Loki season 2 is excellent but at this point it’s lost in the avalanche of bombs (marvels, wish)
Yep, Disney is just off my radar. It's an automatic no.
new disney movies are awful i dont want anything to do with them they destroyed the original owners legacy.@@snowps1
“The movie (Strange Worlds) was so unbelievably inclusive that it excluded most everyone” 😂😂
The SEC filing was worded in a way to protect Disney Inc from being sued by the shareholders.
It won’t work. The largest single generation customer base,the Baby Boomers, are going extinct. Quickly. Ask an actuary about how long they have left. The remaining generational customer bases are exponentially smaller. And the birth rates of future customers are declining rapidly with no signs of slowing. No way out no matter how they word it…imo.
Yep, it looks like it was written by lawyers in the DEI department.
That was my take too - it's a pre-emptive action in the form of a disclaimer designed to protect themselves because they sense the pendulum swinging.
Excellent observation.
WHY does the potential audience not want to see the film, and WHY do the people who did see it think it is a pile of shyte? Those are the questions that Disney should be asking. But they won't...because they already know the answers and they don't want to admit it.
I always laugh at the "blame the audience" thing, cause in a way yes, it is the audience fault for it making no money. But it's their fault for not making something the people actually want to see. They have spent so many years making things no one wants to see that even if they did make something good no one would watch it.
Like I always say... "If you built it they will come".
Disney didn't build it and people didn't come.
_They have spent so many years making things no one wants to see that even if they did make something good no one would watch it._
Exactly.
@@90lancaster Not only did they not build it, they demolished the beautiful castle that was already there and put a concrete and glass box in its place.
Noone wants to visit a concrete hellscape.
@@hayleylongster4698that analogy works very well with how their colorful magical classics were given dim boringly realistic live action remakes, "this is how an actual castle looks like, the old one was too unrealistic, you're welcome"
The trailer for Wish looks like a regular Disney classic. If people don't show up for it, it's not necessary because the movie is bad, it's because the trust is gone.
It's an annoying time we've made it to. Where companies just blame the audience to deflect. No taking a hit from bad decisions, no sign of learning anything from people just not being interested. Now it's just blame the audience, insult the audience, and drive them away.
It’s alright, because it would seem that audiences have started to simply stop caring about being blamed anymore. They’ll either learn eventually or start to simply wither away as they flail around in their self-assumed righteous fury.
@forsociopoliticalstuff2629
No need to argue.
It's obvious mental illness.
Then whine when the audience they ran off doesn't come out in support of your newer junk.
Lol who are those modern audiences 😂 these audience don't even like to watch movies in theatres
The Audience hasn't changed, Disney has changed. That's the whole fallacy with the "modern audience" concept, it's an idea created in mainstream media that doesn't exist in reality. Men and Boys still like the same stuff they did 100 years ago and women and girls same. One of Disney's biggest mistakes was not cashing in on the whole Princess of Mars thing. Books that sell, sell because they contain stories people love, this is the lesson Disney needs to learn, stop trying to re-invent entertainment and go back to putting great stories from the past onto the screen.
This is true. I have to admit, I miss a good romance story, so I basically just watch old media.
I’m suddenly reminded of an exchange from Injustice 2.
“I don’t have time for this, Damian.”
“A good father would make time.”
“A better son would deserve it.”
I wonder if Disney is actually going to disclose to the public and it's investors how much money they lost on movies of 2023 😂
And that’s just the beginning…⌛️
The public absolutely not and they will get as creative as they can to downplay the losses to investors. If Iger doesn't want to be ousted he has to.
It's not due to our "changing preferences", our preference for quality hasn't changed. Our preference for NOT being vilified, preached at and blatantly lied to has not changed. Sorry, woke zealots, you can't force people to like you or your ideology.
If you catch someone in a lie then you are not going to trust them again.
If you get told a show is about the title character and it isn't then you are going to be sceptical that the next one will not be the same again (Doctor Strange 2 being about Wanda, or Moon Knight barely being in his own show etc...)
Preach!
@@90lancasterthey need to quit naming shows after a specific character.
@@lordorielrising4673 I guess we did have the Netflix show "The Defenders" as an exception to that trend in super hero media.
Idiotology*
I think the issue the animated movies are having is a lack of character. A race is not a personality. Disney was famous of personality animation and now many of the characters use the same expressions and gestures. The average audience member doesn't consciously notice this, but subconsciously they do and lose interest.
I'd add that most of morals taught are no longer integrated into the plot. They just end up bloating the final product so that every flim ends up as funeral. Even if you think their heart is in the right place, there has GOT to be a better way to tell these stories in an engaging way. Preferably one with brevity and pacing that made the older flims shine long after release.
Disney has done so much damage to entertainment. It's devastating. 100 years down the drain.
Apathy is now becoming my favorite word.
"The audience changed in unpredictable ways!"
"How did they change?"
"They still want the kind of movies we made from 1937 to 2009!"
I like what Chris Gore said about this. "A very famous studio executive who worked at Sony was so tired of dealing with people who took everything they do so seriously, he put up a banner that said 'reminder: we make sh*t people don't need'. You should be grateful to your customers. Grateful to the people who give you money. And I believe a revolution in independent filmmaking is coming and it's going to leave Hollywood in the dust. And it's only a matter of time."
More people are discovering anime, Bollywood, K-dramas, and other entertainment with each passing year. Hollywood’s time as the only fish in the sea for western audiences is rapidly shrinking.
What audience? They can't they blame the audience when no one showed up to watch it!
👍 they also got caught buying up tickets………again.
Who could have ever predicted that alienating the main movie-going audience, including families with kids, could have been a bad business movie?
"tastes change in unpredictable ways"
The fundamentals of story telling are thousands of years old, our fantasies are even older, baked into our DNA, and the audience is supposed to be children and their parents.
This means, there's no need to "subvert expectations" or "reimagine" anything, but to follow the good old hero's journey, and virtuous characters against simple villains.
All this subversion is cultural M*rxism, malice coming from Disney.
Well, they are not wrong, but they seem to think they are entitled to our money for a bad movie.
Right now seeing Disney lose money while investors squirm is orders of magnitude more entertaining than any "content" they've released in a very long time.
_Current corporate culture + Technocratic tools = Cluster B incompetence._
I have little doubt Disney's market research arm is likely staffed with 20-somethings who WERE exclusively doing their research on Facebook and Twitter. Either that, or else they were told by Iger to tell him what he wanted to hear or face being laid off.
Nah they know there making stuff that will bomb thats why they basicly said so in the earnings report so that way share holders cant sue them for failing in the fudicary responsibility as they have told them they will continue with there ESG objectives even though as they stated has hurt there brands in the eyes of consumers .
@@soulfirez4270did they tell the shareholders that it will continue as parents won’t share it with their kids so the kids when grown won’t share it with theirs?
And so on and so on..
And each year fewer future customers are born
Leading to smaller customer base
That have fewer kids
Which then creates an even smaller number
And so on
And so on
😎⌛️
Oh, there’s a big surprise! That’s an incredible-I think I’m going to have a heart attack and *die* from that surprise! 🤦♀️
Disneus Snape: "You dare use my own words against me, Potter?!"
Disney makes a product for an customer. The customer doesn't want what Disney is producing. So instead of changing their product offering, they are blaming the customer for not buying. Disney's hubris is amazing.
Seeing these woke companies cope with failure is like watching a petulant child throw a tantrum when they're told that they are wrong.
When people reject your same product again and again, that's on you. At what business school do they teach you otherwise?
"How many times do we have to teach you this lesson old man?!"
So, to summarize, we've reached the temper tantrum stage where the board is trying to tell the Pixiedusters: "People are picking on us! It's not our fault!"
They've been listening to Frolo sing "Hellfire" too long. Especially when he's being questioned by his imaginary inquisition by proclaiming "It's not My *Fault* !"
Just how absurdly unable to admit any responsibility can people be? They could just suck it up, try and fix things and then actually maybe earn money again. Don't they want to earn money again? What is wrong with these people?
Pride is the first and deadliest of all sins.
I would like to take this opportunity to apologise to Disney for having "preferences" that do not align with their corporate policies.
Disney: "BAD NEWS! Our movie tanked!"
Discerning Movie Goers: "OH NO! Anyways..."
Leave it to Disney to essentially blame the audience once again despite the fact that there are now quite a few movies since the pandemic that can be pointed to as the outright counter point to their bs. I swear, even after Disney implodes under the pressure of their own bs they'll still refuse to admit they were wrong at all.
I wonder how many billions of their customers' pension dollars Blackrock has lost already? I wonder how much more they can keep losing before it becomes a problem for them, and they have to face the music? (I've noticed articles in financial circles about how they think people are living too long, and retirement ages should be raised ten or fifteen years, even though life expectancy has been dropping. I wonder if Blackrock and other ESG companies are spreading those articles?)
At 30 something I'm already convinced I'll never "retire". Just gonna have my cake early, no point letting Blackrock enjoy it when they're busy pissing it away on ESG anyway.
Much more conspirationist and dire perspective: they're canceling entertainment companies starting from the biggest one, as to make people wanting to work more...
...it's very stupid, i know, but that way it makes a smidge of sense. 🤷♂️
@@turntoyouI'm 52.....I've known the whole house of cards of retirement isnt gonna work for any generation past the boomers
@@darkhighwayman1757 Same. I'm very slightly younger than you, but the whole thing just doesn't work in a system that has few safeguards and actively malicious companies such as vanguard and blackrock.
so long as disney refuses to admit that they have made mistakes, then no one cares what Fairie tales their spin.
The two best words that describe Disney and corporations in general are greed and hubris. Add to that ESG/DEI then we have an insufferable situation that will only get worse.
Blaming the audience. Ohh no.
my changing preference is that i prefer not to watch disney anymore
14:01 One way to read the title is "the audiences tastes don't align with our ESG".
This tells us everything we need to know.
Disney stopped making movies for me so I stopped going to see their movies.
Disney made their movies specifically for a certain type of audience that hardly goes to the movies.
Disney has been giving themselves 5 star reviews for so long that they forgot that theyre failing.
So, they pulled another Lightyear… At a time when their reputation is the lowest… And people wonder why they want to see Disney burn.
I didn't even know this movie was released. Did Disney spend absolutely nothing on marketing cause they expected it to fail?
Disney: Blame the audience! I mean it didn't work the last dozen times, but *maybe this time...*
Did anyone else notice that Wish’s Asha has the same hairstyle as Captain Marvel in the Marvels. What’s with the tight corn roll braids on the left side with the rest of the hair long? I’ve seen it so many times recently. You’d think they’d want the characters to look more unique and would have changed one of them to look different.
Standard Woke Hairstyle
All they had to do is make once upon a studio into a full feature film that would've saved them this year
Disney looking for what customers want on Twitter is stupid. How about asking a bunch of people, mostly parents with young kids, what they want? It's a total no brainer and yet there are those big earners in Disney, along with their marketing managers, who are utterly incompetent.
Disney blaming the audience is like a Chef Blaming his bad Food on Your Taste Buds SMH
Blaming the customer who ordered a steak for refusing to eat mutton
😎
Everyone predicts what they find "unpredictable" - weird, weird.
All they can do is blame the audience now. They don't know what else to do.
And I say "sure. It's our fault."
....
WISH failed because we actually care about paying for QUALITY films. Good stories and so on.
I see ESG and DEI coming. You are the best to talk about this subject. It is always clear and I have no problem to send your video to the "norrmis' without sounding conspiracy freak.
In 1 sense they're right...we refuse to buy the swill, they're selling. Its like being served a lukewarm bowl of vomit, & being told eat up.
Disney needs to start learning the difference between their target demographic and their desired demographic.
I think they are actually hitting their desired demographic. That's the whole problem - Their "desired demographic" is a small minority, where as their Empire was built on catering to a wide majority (conservative families). It's not even so much about "woke", it's just "business" - If you turn your back on your customers, they will return the favor. The inevitable result is that your product will no longer sustain the huge amounts of money you are spending to produce it.
I am astounded that the current Management is still in place. In most sane organizations, they would have been tarred and feathered years ago...
They can only blame themselves. You would think they’d learn, but they keep doubling down their failing narrative.
'Sounds better in the boardroom than putting the blame on groomer/writers' -Bob Iger
They’ll run this company into the ground before they change course.
i hope they increase the movies they put out every year so this happens very soon.
That's how you know you've gone the way of these woke dodos. Blame the world, take no accountability, and make no effort to improve. This is the pathetic state of mind our society is suffering from.
You can't change your audience, you can only change your films.
Disney and marvel ignore the fact that spiderman no way home did well in the midst of the pandemic.
Or how the sonic movies did amazingly, or the Mario films, etc, because they openly embraced their fans and core audiences.
@@forsociopoliticalstuff2629 yeah i enjoyed the sonic movie far mkre than I expected too. I also loved the Warcraft movie.
What do they think is going to happen when they hire people that hate their customers?
You have to wonder how many first dates have to suddenly make a hasty excuse before high-tailing it to the door before the person left sitting alone at the restaurant wonders... "Is it possible the problem is me?"
This is something you'll notice throughout Hollywood history. How they blame the movie audience for their own shortcomings. If that doesn't tell you that they don't give two shits about you, nothing probably will
This is in-crowd standard behaviour. I've seen it at companies who blame their customers for their own poor business models/short comings.
@@banedon8087 Shitty either way
I can’t wait to see Disney Land in abandoned theme park photo collections, a memory.
Clear, concise, succinct & informative. You always present the subtleties & nuances of each topic, & bring together information from many dependable sources I appreciate your excellent take on the latest developments of the ongoing Dizney Disaster!! 👍
Sure the audience is to blame. They're the ones not buying the tickets. Could it be that they just think the movie sucks?
The people who are not buying tickets are not "the audience" ... 🤔
Disney blaming fans again? Color me shocked
They are the only ones who don't know, they're over. By their own hand. No trust left, none. Soon comes box office $0.00. They get that from me and mine now.
Great video! Please keep up the good work! Love the channel!
14:51 I think I will give a short answer in advances based on the clues we have in this article.
Disney refers to their policies as their "Environmental ans Social Goals"...ESG. That is their policies, and this is why they're failing.
No matter what Ratty Fink says, a high ESG score is not an alternative to profits.
Disney thinks they can release 20 films a year without realizing that people are not going to movies like they did pre-pandemic.
We all learned how nice it is to watch at home, many building pretty nice home theatre setups during lockdowns. Inflation eats up incomes making it unlikely to spend money on going out.
No studio is doing well (Barbie being an outlier) but they're not putting out 20 films a year b/c they realize it's not worth it.
I don’t think the sc**demic has all that much to do with it. I used to go to the movies about once a month; now I go to the movies maybe once a year. It’s because there is nothing being released that appeals to me.
At this point all I can say to Disney is,
If the whole park smells like dog poo, check your shoe.
So what you're saying is that entertainment companies should keep their nose out of social and political conversations? 🤔 Never woulda guessed that would hurt their profits.
We’ve been telling them for years, and they refuse to listen. they have forgotten that the fan is the customer
Ummmm yes they are correct. I hate Disney and their activism, my family will never spend a cent on Disney products again. So yeah I made this stupid movie fail. I'll do it again too.
I'm way past hate watching them, I have fortunately found better sources of entertainment. Their former fans are now exactly like parents when they just so fed up with your misbehaviour that they'll just be silent and ignoring you. The worst type of rage
Disney Blows !!
Budweiser that Shite !!!
If Disney's wanted to make a "Bang!" In their 100 anniversary, they managed to, just not in a way they expect to.
The list of risk factors was NOT a call by Disney. There is no way Disney volunteered to put it in there. Their AUDITORS (I think Price Waterhouse) made them put it there or they would refuse to sign off on the 10k. PW auditors likely came requested or came across marketing reports that showed polls of their customers and audience that clearly showed them abandoning the company based off their political/social stances.
Interesting