Hi, Sorry for that, but I think there is a wrong somewhere. Cell F12 in the sheet Model 1 that represent Significance F is: 4.6710E-6 which actually means: 0.000004671 which is very less than 0.05.
1. MR alone does not mean anything, unless you have solid theoretical framework. 2. On the contrary to what you have said, the p values appear to be less than 0.05.
I am sorry to say this, but this video clip has a lot of inaccuracies. I strongly advise Dr. Debra to revisited the clip and make amendments or take it down.
Hi,
Sorry for that, but I think there is a wrong somewhere.
Cell F12 in the sheet Model 1 that represent Significance F is: 4.6710E-6 which actually means: 0.000004671 which is very less than 0.05.
i caught that too
i was confused too
Please check the P-values 3:18 You are considering them more than alpha (0.05) which is wrong.
1. MR alone does not mean anything, unless you have solid theoretical framework.
2. On the contrary to what you have said, the p values appear to be less than 0.05.
Why is the P-Value in S13 too big? It's ~0.00000126 if I'm seeing it correctly
i think she's talking about the 2.5 in second row p-value
The entire regression table explanation seems to be incorrect. The p-value explanation is wrong.
Finally came down to male female
I am sorry to say this, but this video clip has a lot of inaccuracies. I strongly advise Dr. Debra to revisited the clip and make amendments or take it down.
Thank you for this video. Truly helpful.
The. p Value is much les then .05
This video is ironic in many ways
Your P values are okay Dr Debra they are all less than 0.05, I think you didn't check the negative exponent
Who gave her doctorate?
Even I want to know
Dr Dean here should have her PhD rescinded after this video. Yikes
can i get the dataset?
Huh? Fsig>.05 ????
oh wow, you should take this video down.