"Heidegger As Theological Antiseptic". On God, Truth, Time || Dialogue with James Orr

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 5. 04. 2022
  • Get the Study Guide for my new course on Heidegger's seminal Being and Time here
    www.halkyonguild.org/heidegge...
    Seminars begin mid January 2023.
    Dr James Orr and Dr Johannes A. Niederhauser discuss Heidegger's influence on contemporary theology, his insights into the metaphysics of religion, but also the limitations of Heidegger's critique of metaphysics and why his work, prophetic as it is at times, maters regardless of its inherent shortcomings.
    Dr Orr's website www.divinity.cam.ac.uk/direct...
    I’m a free scholar. It is your generous contributions that make my work possible. Huge thanks to all my supporters!
    Support me via PayPal: www.paypal.com/paypalme/janie...
    Enrol in one of my courses here halkyonacademy.teachable.com/
    Buy me book and a drink on Subscribestar www.subscribestar.com/jnieder...
    Patreon: www.patreon.com/classicalphil...
    Gift Bitcoin: 3JimXYdoLVPWVEtk3tPtiYcLqQsFmS5KmH
    Copyright: Johannes Achill Niederhauser

Komentáře • 20

  • @axelmolina6552
    @axelmolina6552 Před 2 lety +4

    I never thought that I'd be so close to faith in the "existence" of God. This was an incredible conversation. Thank you!

    • @jaylinn416
      @jaylinn416 Před 2 lety

      One of the very best on CZcams!

  • @kehindeonakunle7404
    @kehindeonakunle7404 Před rokem +2

    Erudite conversation, the best of its kind. Very informing and entertaining

  • @NikolaiRogich
    @NikolaiRogich Před 4 měsíci

    Stunningly lucid and productive conversation. Please continue your work🙏🙏

  • @josephgemin171
    @josephgemin171 Před 2 lety +4

    Really enjoyed Orr’s take on Heidegger. Nice job of not interrupting, Johannes! (Speaks volumes about your own genuine commitment to knowledge.)

  • @MrRiismaa
    @MrRiismaa Před 2 lety +2

    Birds singing in the background is both ironically and most beautifully corresponding to your topics. Thank you!

  • @xavierharrison7104
    @xavierharrison7104 Před 7 měsíci

    Great conversation thanks Johannes.

  • @RobWalker1
    @RobWalker1 Před 2 lety +1

    Dr Orr's profile is refreshing reading!

  • @Dannydowns1234
    @Dannydowns1234 Před rokem +1

    Just starting to read and appreciate Heidegger. Really enjoy conversations like this.

  • @nathanpoole-mccullough9104
    @nathanpoole-mccullough9104 Před 10 měsíci +2

    28:49 James mentions a passage from one of Heidegger’s lectures in 1950’s distinguishing between the god of the philosophers and the God people pray to… can you provide a citation for that quote? I’m fascinated.

    • @nathanpoole-mccullough9104
      @nathanpoole-mccullough9104 Před 8 měsíci +1

      "This ground itself needs to be properly accounted for by that for which it accounts, that is, by the causation through the supremely original matter - and that is the cause as causa sui. This is the right name for the god of philosophy. Man can neither pray nor sacrifice to this god. Before the causa sui, man can neither fall to his knees in awe nor can he play music and dance before this god."
      - Quote by Martin Heidegger

  • @fr.hughmackenzie5900
    @fr.hughmackenzie5900 Před rokem +2

    Fascinating. Though I think that the "analogy of being" can easily be a way of covering over the fact that, as per much post-Heideggerian thought, the conclusion of cosmological arguments has not been soundly demonstrated to be transcendent of physical being, let alone the Biblical personal God.

    • @JohannesNiederhauser
      @JohannesNiederhauser  Před rokem +1

      Say more please

    • @fr.hughmackenzie5900
      @fr.hughmackenzie5900 Před rokem +1

      @@JohannesNiederhauser Cosmological arguments make the jump to metaphysics which Heidegger has shown is unjustified. How do we get from meaning within the environment of the human to that outside of it? Frankly the need for an absolute (e.g. the Contingency Argument’s premise, “something, like a cosmos, made of contingent things is contingent”) was never properly justified.
      Moreover, as this discussion made even clearer through Heidegger, such an absolute Prime Mover seems at best a stripped down version of the God of the People of Israel.
      One cannot simply use the Analogia Entis to jump either of those gaps as, in this video, Dr Orr implies is possible - though I realise it was a brief discussion.

  • @Adeptus_Mechanicus
    @Adeptus_Mechanicus Před měsícem

    What would Heidegger think about the concept of the 'soul?'

  • @woggles8100
    @woggles8100 Před rokem

    How necessary is it to read Husserl first?