10 Fastest Single Engine Turboprop Aircraft Of 2023
Vložit
- čas přidán 26. 08. 2024
- 10 Fastest Single Engine Turboprop Aircraft Of 2023
Ever wondered about the fastest single-engine turboprop aircraft out there? Well, today is your lucky day! Welcome to our thrilling countdown of the '10 Fastest Single-Engine Turboprop Aircraft of 2023.' Get ready to be amazed as we explore these high-performance marvels that take to the skies with power and grace. From incredible speeds to cutting-edge engineering, we'll showcase the finest in aerial excellence.
In today's video we look at 10 Fastest Single Engine Turboprop Aircraft Of 2023
🎁 Become a WOL Member Today: bit.ly/join_wol
🔔 Don't miss our latest jet reviews-hit the bell icon!
👇 Enjoying the content? Consider buying me a coffee to help me creating these videos. Your support means a lot!
➡️ www.buymeacoff...
Subscribe for Private Jet, Billionaire Lifestyle and Luxury Lifestyle. Inspired by King Luxury, Sam Chui and Aviation Base.
Inspired by 10 Fastest Single Engine Turboprop Planes
Inspired by Top 5 Single-Engine Turboprop Aircraft Over $1M 2022-2023 | Aircraft Comparison
Inspired by 10 Fastest Single Engine Planes
Click here to subscribe: bit.ly/Subscri...
Thank you for your support!
Click here to become a WOL Member today and to support our channel: bit.ly/join_wol
Click here to watch ➡ 10 Cheapest Airplanes Anyone Can Buy In 2023
czcams.com/video/qzjTMokBtUY/video.html
I just can't let it go ... The volume of errors in this video is astounding.
"Tandem side by side seating..."😂😂😂
For a while now, Mike Patey's Turbulence is the fastest single engine turboprop aircraft at a little over 370knots.
yes in till mike brakes it for the engine will be worked on and?
I wish you would spend 15 minutes in research before posting these videos. The Epic E1000 GX has a max cruise speed of 333 KTS which is 383 mph, not 325 mph like you have in the video. Also, you are talking about the Epic while showing video clips of the M600 an other airplanes. Just really annoys me to see these type of videos where the poster spends so little time on the content and could care less if it is accurate or not.
HYPERBOLIC speech to the next level also.
the script is ChatGPT written. This entire channel is AI.
I was going to make some of the same complaints and more but you've got it covered 😁😁
4:50 ‘it’s a tandem seat cockpit allowing the pilot and trainee to sit side by side’, as the screen shows us the real configuration…🤦🏻♂️🤷♂️😂 This is garbage AI pushed out to make quick money for a lazy idiot…
"Boasts a side-by-side cockpit..." while showing tandem front/back setup. Ugh.
T-6 Texan is not "side by side " seating
The thing is narrators always quote HP what should always most importantly say is torque. Torque is what can turns a big prop and HP carry’s it plus other things. Torque is king on power. That’s the magic secret of the Rolls Royce Merlin engine. Massive torque that made it King of aero engines!!!
Amazing, every engine is robust and has a remarkable range.
How can you say side by side when in 2 instances they're clearly tandem seating
You forgott Mike Pateys Turbolance.
Its not side by side - Tacano
The T-6 has tandem seating!!
Good Details
It would have been better if average fuel burn at cruise speeds are mentioned
Thank you for your comment. We will keep this in mind for future videos!
Nice video but you would do well to stop referring to tandem seating as side by side.
Soooo...Pratt and Whitney makes turbo prop engines?
Overall good information, with corrections needed as described above. One more - incorrect to say “side-by-side” for the tandem cockpit aircraft, although subsequent verbiage did clarify the obvious “tandem” seating. Suggest deleting “side-by-side” in the initial description of seating configuration.
How can leave the Turbine Legend off this list? If the PC-21 earns top spot, a Garrett 331-10 powered Legend making 1150/shp will outperform every AC on this list
Of course not, the Pilatus PC21 is Powered by a PT6A-68B / 1600 SHP
There are a lot of error in the speed announced; you are confusing knots and MPH…… and you should specify if you are talking in miles or Nautical Miles, lot’s of errors
T-6 Texan is tandem seating, not side by side. :)
Pilots sits side by side??? Or one behind the other.?
The stats on the Pilatus PC12NG are incorrect cruise is 280 knots or 322 mile per hour.
Look up side by side and tandem please
What in the world do you mean it's tandem seating side by side?????
There is a Pilatus PC12 NGX but is there a Pilatus P21 NGX? Confusion there!
Turbulence 4 is faster.
very impressive. But none of these can outpace a WW2 P51D or P47 😊
As a pilot and mech, I can safely say that WW2 aircraft, F4U, P51, etc., did not motor along at 300+ mph. Yes, topped out, they could hit the 400 or so. The engines had a combat life well below 200 +/- combat hours. Where a Garrett or PT6 has well over 2000 hrs plus depending on the "program," it's on. I absolutely would love a Bearcat!!!
About the PC21NGX. You are saying that it is powered by a PT6A-68B. I am confused because you are showing a GE M601-H80 engine. Now, tell me what the truth is about the engine.
Your speeds are wrong they should be in knots not miles per hour. For instance that pc-21 is 370 kts which is 426mph.
@3:10 side by side?!!!!
Que paso con el CESSNA DENALI?
Dude you need to be talking in knots not MPH
In aviation we are using kts not mph !
Lame list. The brasislan Tucanos are the fastest turboprop. Read more before posting your videos
No. The American Turbulence 4 is faster. Sorry.
AI trash