Charlie Kirk VS Environmentalist
Vložit
- čas přidán 6. 09. 2024
- #charliekirk #turningpointusa #debate
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @dumsybrown
If you guys are wanting to support me and my channel in any small way to help with upkeep and upgrading of equipment to get up more content, you can buy me a coffee :) I would appreciate it loads! www.buymeacoff...
Follow me on instagram: / dumsybrown
turning point usa, turning point, tpusa, Charlie kirk, Charlie Kirk candace owens, Charlie Kirk college students, Charlie Kirk college campus, Charlie Kirk best moments compilation, Charlie Kirk best moments, fyp, tiktok, viral, viral video, full video, Charlie Kirk full speech, Charlie Kirk q&a, Charlie Kirk debate, Charlie Kirk get owned, Charlie Kirk smug college student, Charlie Kirk berkeley, Charlie Kirk, Charlie Kirk college, university, public university, Candace Owens
Says the young man completely unable to look away from his device whilst asking a question then reading figures out.
Wouldn't it be great to see a student with a steno pad with the words written down showing some form of studying the subject beforehand?
Yet we aren't seeing 8 times as many storms as we did in the 80's.
No but it does seem to be that the storms are getting more severe
@@HelloThere..... but they aren't.
There isn't more drought either.
@@HelloThere..... The storms aren't getting more severe; the mainstream media is just hiring more meteorologists that are good at being overdramatic.
@@davidjackson2690 Yes there IS more drought. For instance the South West corner of Australia now has 15% less rainfall then in the 1980's. Scientists warned of this due to computer models. Luckily they convinced the city of Perth to install a desalinated water plant. The city is now dependent on it.
Also warmer winter temperatures are causing less precipitation to fall as snow in the Northern Hemisphere, including in key regions like the Sierra Nevada of California.
@@grumnut1854 there has been RECORD snowfall in the Sierra Nevadas in the last few years contrary to what these "scientists" had to say.
No less ice on the poles either.
Temps, rain/snowfall, droughts etc. have been recorded for how long?
A few hundred years?
This is one of Charlie's worst moments. His battery statements are false. Radioactive batteries? Cobalt comes from the Congo. This kid probably had no idea. Congo is a bad actor in the mining space. Charlie is a great proponent of free speech. Batteries don't have the negative impact Charlie is assuming. If I didn't work in the green energy space I would probably believe what Charlie said.
Elon musk have been working on new batteries he knew that the lithium battery are not the way but for now the are but soon will more safe battery
Soon? What does soon mean? How about figure it out first! It’s not like there is one or two EVs out there. There is always a comprise isn’t there. Meanwhile let a few people get rich from this nonsense.
Can these geniuses speak without a phone to hold what they should know already ? BTW , planetary observers have found that all of our solar neighbors have risen in temperature the same amount as our planet . Did we do that too ?
Um, since the Sun has been on the wane since the early 1970s, that's a strange result.
1:20 If my house is on fire, or if I drop a candle, does it make sense for me to knowingly pour gasoline over the candle and watch it go up in flames to ignite the rest of my house, and say that because the gasoline only contributed 10% to the entirety of the fire, that I shouldn’t have not done that?
That 10% that I caused is the thing that caused the tipping point of collapse, it's what caused the fire to actually burn the house down.
Likewise, what if an ecosystem could handle a temperature change of 5°, but not of 5.5°? Because let's say only one species cant survive the temperature change, but that species is a keystone species that causes a cascade of collapse. The human activity could be the tipping point because we're talking about climate physics and biochemistry which is EXTREMELY fragile and requires very specific conditions.
Will live survive? Yes of course but not life as we know it.
What's the solution? Well, I think it's to use as much fuel of every kind we can gather right now at the best efficiency rate so that we have more energy and better economies, infrastructure, and education throughout the world and then use that to advance technology to make energy that doesn't contribute to climate change.
A controlled burn, if you will.
@@HelloThere..... the gasoline didn't cause 10% of the fire, so your premise is seriously flawed. And your english is atrocious. Please understand that you are in serious need of an education and that a 10 page comment is a sign of a weak argument.
1:25 okay but that's a fallacy. Even if humans ing contribute to 10% of it, the idea that we then should continue to do the thing that's going to hurt us because it's not hurting us as bad as other things is bad. Especially as it relates to things like climate which are extremely fragile and a difference of 10% could drastically change life as we know it.
Eh. Not really. The earth goes through cycles like this all the time.
@@Lilrob06 They always speak in constants like this, don't they?
It might be a good idea to understand the word fallacy before using it. It might also be à good idea to understand that while "humans" contribute MAYBE 10% of the cause of climate change, its not the humans that care. The humans that are possibly contributing are in 3rd world countries and China and India.
Actually humans are contributing slightly OVER 100% of the warming. We should be slightly cooler now then the early 1970s, but we're not. Since Charlie agrees we have been warming, that should have been the answer.