Evolutionary Big Bang | Wonders of the Universe w/ Brian Cox | BBC Studios
Vložit
- čas přidán 19. 10. 2013
- To celebrate World Space Week from 4 to 10 October 2013 we're uploading clips from Wonders of the Universe with Professor Brian Cox. With some of the world's most fascinating fossils in hand Brian considers how, but for an apparently obscure moment in the early evolutionary history of life, all the secrets of light may have remained hidden. Because although the universe is bathed in light that carries extraordinary amounts of information about where we come from, it would have remained invisible without a crucial evolutionary development that allowed us to see. Only because of that development can we now observe, capture and contemplate the incredible wonders of the universe that we inhabit.
Having explored the wonders of the solar system, Professor Brian Cox steps boldly on to an even bigger stage - the universe. Who are we? Where do we come from? For thousands of years humanity has turned to religion and myth for answers to these enduring questions. But in this series, Brian presents a different set of answers - answers provided by science.
This is a channel from BBC Studios who help fund new BBC programmes. Service information and feedback: www.bbcstudios.com/contact/co... - Zábava
Brian Cox is a marvelous fellow :^) I love the way he presents these programs.
I love this man
It's looking like the BBC are lining him up to take over from Attenborough, I can appreciate his calm measured layman approach and the fact that he has shown the ability to present on a number of topics but in all honesty I think Neil Degrasse Tyson is now my go to guy for science documentaries.
I could listen this voice forever
actually the national geographic institute reported that the acceptance of evolution in the united states is about 40%, acceptance of creationism is about 35% with the remaining population being undecided. Among The scienctific community, acceptance of evolution is 97.7%. In europe, acceptance for evolution is 80%. this suggests the american education system is behind on its current understanding of evolution.
So do something about it? No? Okay keep posting useless CZcams comments and being as useful to society as a rock.
Thank you. Your video is very interesting. .
Trilobites were among the most successful creatures ever...
awesome video ! thank you for sharing ;
have a nice sunday !
This is very good. Congratulations!
Now if only we Canadians can get our government back on track with the protection, preservation, and exploration of important environmental, ecological, and scientific finds such as this one.
Stretching the BBCs travel budget to its absolute limits
In one of his lectures on CZcams, he's been to Chaco canyon which is awesome because that's the state where I live. And it's a great place to observe the milky way in the summer.
I was looking on tv 20 times! Irs very intresting!
Wicked thanks 😎
what A great video, I really wish there was more funding available to create a proper museum at this site. The current one is a little underwhelming compared to the significance of the site.
No te pierdes de mucho créeme.
to the point
Evolution has the answer to our existence... I once believed in all that creationism nonsense...I much rather see the Sun as our God than some random man known as Jesus..Great Vid
well Its a little more complicated than that. see the organism he was holding at the end (pilkai*) was worm like but was technically a chordate like us with a backbone.
- So just because these animals are underwater they are immune t the rules of gigantothermy?
-We dont have living dinosaurs, but we do have dinosaur bone fossils that can be sliced and photomicroscoped...
-Im not jumping around, you are , i am simply going to counter everything you say that is false. Please do keep going, this is fun.
How come this wasn't in the final cut?
"Big Bank"
- Brian Cox
Dinos weren't reptiles, they were partially warmblooded. Many had feathers, some even had the ability to glide. The smallest dinos were best adapted to survive in the post-meteor world. Those dinos adapted to their new environs by making more feathers, which makes flying easier.
Look at all the evolving we've forced upon domesticated animals. Dogs come in all shapes and sizes even though they all started as Wolves. Given enough time we could make whole new species. Evolution is just slower.
Go look into Archaeopteryx, Jinfengopteryx, Velociraptor, Epidexipteryx, Eosinopteryx, etc. There are a ton of feathered dinosaurs.
You need to do some research on this topic before you discount an entire field of archaeology because you find it inconvenient.
🙏
Aye son, they be mentioning it.
There has to be an explanation for everything. I just wish I knew
This is not an academic journal, you know. It's made for laymen, so it is explained in lay terms.
Sylvester we don't get all our questions answered. That's not the way it works man. You might as well face the facts that we're all going to die with a million questions that never get answered.
But in the meantime we are surrounded by amazing phenomena. All you have to do is look around.
Was fortunate enough at 16 to spend a wk there working on becoming a Paleontologists but didn't decide to serve my country instead for 26yrs. Guess I can still do it..only 51..lol
Face on mountain 0:31 :)
porque no esta en español :/
Evolution explains why there are so many different species.
We're still not sure how or why we exist. And that's ok. Hopefully we'll find an answer some day. If there even is one.
The comment isn't about what it was, it was what it evolved into.
dinosaurs were warm blooded due to a process called gigantotthermy. It involves warming the blood of the animal through the heat released by metabolic functions. this is only possible in very large animals like great white sharks and leatherback sea turtles but is an intermediate forms between cold and warm blooded. if anything it supports evolution.
Sylvester I dont think theres much point arguing on a science video as the scientific community is quite clear about evolution
no were talking about the ones from Canada, Germany, Japan, North and south america and Africa. Also the ones from the Gobi and arabian desert.
extremely vestigial gills but yes. What your talking about isn't actually evolution but embryology, the study of the developing fetus. See All our cells originate from stem cells which transform several times. At one time in the womb, fetuses have vestigial gills (non function but present). these gills are composed of cartilage but dont remain long. the cartilage cells move off to the spinal cord where they form the disks in between vertebrae.
Ok say you cannot see you have no way of seeing the object blocking your way then you hit your head against this object and well it hurt but you have no way of stopping it then you think "what if i was able to detect the object with light sensitive cells?" well more or less this is what evolution is your cells and DNA process information to deal with problems on a physical level.
Accept whatever that is there as theories of evolution , unless you can come up with something that answers our origin and not only our but the universe's as well, and no matter what we do we will never EVER get an answer as to what caused it ..as there is no point of start as such...but only more mysteries to solve.
With all this celebrating world space week... Will the BBC be mentioning ISON? Considering its a pretty amazing comet in space that will be shooting pass earth very soon. Not heard a single thing on TV about ISON? Why?
We did evolve out of something worm-like, but not the "worm" (i assume earthworm) he was referring to.
I don't understand this comment, are you going against this video saying that "worms are not our ancestors." or what, because i vastly believe more so that this worm is what we evolved from compared to humans appearing out of thin air.
No...you do not have "more evidence or creation". In fact you have ZERO evidence for creation. Because creation presupposes a creator, and you have no proof of such a thing ever existing or possibly existing.
"Makes more sense"...who cares if something makes more sense to YOU?! Whether something is easier to understand or not, has NO bearing whatsoever on whether it is true or not.
It seems to me we should have evolved x-ray or infrared vision by now.
They didn't "decide" There was no conscious decision
no archaeopteryx was not a bird, It had teeth, talons, non gripping feet, hands with claws but most importantly: it lacked a pygostyle which is one of the defining characteristic of birds. Evolution suggests archeopteryx was similar to birds but ultimately a dead end. Oher species like protoavis were much likely to be the ancestor of birds but not birds themselves.
My Religion
we did not come from rocks, Not only is that false but that has NOTHING to do with the theory of evolution. That is the theory of Abiogenesis which is not accepted by everyone and thats understandable. Even among the scientific community there are many christians who find evolution to be fully plauside and in no disagreement with the bible. Heck even the Catholic church says evolution is fine.
If you knew anything about evolution, you'd believe in it and know that worms are not our ancestors. Then again, I'm sure you'd take a book written 2,000 years ago by desert nomads as the truth without hesitation.
I do love science and im a believer in Christ (not from believing in order to comfort my consciousness) but a true believer where i had a personal experience that scientist will never explain. The Bible contain statement that shouldn't be taking literally for ex. "If your right eye cause you to sin, pluck it out. For its better for your eye to perish than your whole body) they people in the NT would have been walking with one arms and three fingers if they took that literally.
it seems like most ppl form a false dichotomy between evolution and a creator; the two aren't necessarily mutually exclusive
but saying that life was created when we know very well that life has a common ancestor (of all life) that only appears in the fossil record about 3.5 billion years ago was a special creation is a bit of a god-of-the-gaps argument. It certainly doesn't sound like a personal or loving god, more like the god of Einstein.
Sure, but the biblical creator is resoundingly disproven so why even mention it?
I think you are confusing evolution with the origin of the universe or abiogenesis.
Im not quite sure what you're trying say about shrimp...
As for the part about the bible denying evolution, Ive never read a passage that mentions the bottleneck effect, Sexual selection, genetic drift, allopatric or sympatric speciation. Most of these phenomena COULD NOT be understood at the time because there was no knowledge of DNA. I cant tell you the scriptures are wrong but you cant tell me biological forms of evolution proven recently by genetic data are mentioned in the bible
Evolution is based on rock solid logic and evidence. There is no better theory in existence. The rapid evolution of viruses requires the constant development of new vaccines.
it was poorly stated it isn't quite that simple but it did happen
I not sure what you're trying to ay, something about spices?
Weve created entirely new species of drosophila, viruses and bacteria in the lab.
I said less then 10%. Search it yourself.
Archaeopteryx is a real bird and the other are correct but its not support Macro evolution. thanks for the info.
Just came to see some comments against this guy lol
First
If i wanted to read something made up I would read the original source ie the bible
Its a rhetorical question. Those questions are answered.
Sorry creationists, may you forever be doomed by your blindness.
gigantothermy is found in sea creature and they think that the dinosaur did the same. I understand the Turtles etc.. have no way to stay warm in a open ocean.
-i agree.
-You stayed with fact then jump into no facts. In religion, that believing in this and that without facts.
-and yes. im enjoying this conversation! im learning
Viruses can be considered a type of animal and it proves that the mechanics of evolution are real.
fool!
Archaeopteryx is still being debating if its a dinosaur or a real bird. Its hasnt been confirmed. I not going to bother with the archaeopteryx.
That is called "adaptation" , its not macro evolution bro.
only evolution that are observable is micro evolution.
go back to school please
Those are sea creatures. And if you didnt figured out what you just said, you went to science then jump into religion. We dont have a living dinosaur to observed, so we cant interpret the bones of it.
not sure I agree with the term "evolutionary big bang" how can the fossil of a creature with (what Brian Cox himself calls) a compound eye not have a long complex history of evolution. Just because we have found no record of complex life before the cambrian era doesn't mean it wasn't there. He talks about arms races, the race was on long before we discovered the burgess shale. to call it the definitive moment is just ignorant.
nothing can evolve suddenly from no where
If by suddenly you mean over millions of years. We've witnessed species evolve within our own lifetime.
You act like you done your researched and is able to state a claim. Your are greatly mistaken, if your dont agree that the world is intelligently designed and a man like you can make a rose out of nothing? Wrong because its in fact designed by someone with beyond knowledge. A painting on your wall must have a painter because you see it. You dont have to know that there a painter involve, its common sense. Same goes with life on earth and space.
I just cant agree that human came from anything else but from God himself. I can give you logic reason and you have free will to disagree but if you agree then i can come to you with supernatural reason to believe in Christ. Scientist cant fully understand spiritual activity and cant explain it. Please if you can, show if your perspective of life and the meaning of life. Where are we from and what are our purpose in life and where are we going after life.
You need to get your facts right about how many people believe in evolution. Its less then 10% in American and more then half believe in creationism.
Your source pus us in another subject. Its accepted due to the fact thats its tax funded. Scientific community know the consequent of believing in creationism. The have no choice unless they are willy to lose their job.
There's no proof of evolution, and I must be wrong in the head to think human came from soup or even from worms. I guess we should stop using our ancestor as bait lololol
We do have more evidence of creation and it makes more sense than evolution. i conduct my research, maybe you should do the dame and not be close minded.
Read the quran on the big bang...
"they grew eyes"..yeah wonder how they decided they wanted to see.