Can Arming Ukraine Even Possibly Leave NATO Without Enough Weapons? | The Gaze

Watch FULL episode here: • Talk For More Details:...
Amidst rumors and speculations about certain countries withholding weapons from Ukraine, Pavel Fischer sheds light on the complex dynamics at play. He addresses the question of whether withholding weapons is linked to concerns about self-defense capabilities. Drawing parallels to the Czech Republic's perspective, Fischer highlights the need for a nuanced understanding of the assistance provided to Ukraine.
_____________________________________
Subscribe to The Gaze: / channel
UATV Explains page: / uatvexplains
Subscribe to UATV English:
Facebook: / uatven
Twitter: / uatv_en
Telegram: t.me/uatv_eng
Website : uatv.ua/en/
#UATV #UATV_English #UkraineNews #UATV_News #weapons#rumors #selfdefense #CzechRepublic's#LatestNews #TopNewsUkraine

[@whysoserious8666]

The weapons NATO provides to Ukraine were always intended to be used against the Russians. It’s silly to argue that Ukraine can’t have them to use against the Russians because the other NATO countries need them as strategic reserves…to use against the Russians.

[@yoloesad76]

Good point, those same weapons weakned russia so the weapons werent a waste really like you said

[@alexanderwingeskog758]

Yep I agree. Though there is a couple of things. There are newly developed weapons which have HUGE research and development costs that would be scary to hand over to another country and hope it does not get into enemy hands. And sadly China seems to be as aggressive as Russia now a days and could start something that we (west/world) need to stop and without weapons/ammo China could destroy us all...

[@natamadic]

I bet sweet and caring Russian fascists can’t fall asleep at night worrying that NATO countries might be running low on ammo.

[@BlackEpyon]

NATO is short of surplus ammo. Not their main stocks. They don't give those to anybody.

[@dioghaltasfoirneartach7258]

The orcs have vodka...

[@jampasurprenant1794]

Why not if Ukraine needed a
Weapons giving to Ukraine to
Defense itself .

[@camoTiara]

💛🇺🇦💙

[@HostileRespite]

Nonsense!!! Providing Ukraine assistance allows NATO to upgrade its arsenal and get in fighting shape. We're also learning that our arsenals have been too anemic to deal with an adversary like Russia. We are lucky to have this time to prepare, and by doing so we likely won't need to use them.

[@dioghaltasfoirneartach7258]

What the hell happened to all that 'slavic unity' and solidarity with a fellow country oppressed by russia??
After all that has happened, how the hell could Ukraine's immediate neighbors suddenly switch sides, and support russia????

[@sooz9433]

His eyes... 😮

[@nicholasgrossman3194]

America has COMPLETE control of Kiev.

[@williamhawks2372]

All the NATO countries should have stock of weapons or NATO should have stocks of weapons for emergency supplies put all in the mountain trucks everything you need wind you take something out order it and the American should by the metal plant in Syracuse, New York to make bombs faster because I think they are too slow just have one place to make the bombs

[@eh1702]

Stock of emergency to fight WHO?
Your argument is the argument for never using these stocks even when invaded.

[@allanjmacleod6438]

Political crap...he went on and on and never answered the question!

[@Bionic_Viking]

This is a lie, America is bound by law to have a certain amount of munitions, everything getting sent to Ukraine is extra. Send all addition weaponry to Ukraine but keep accountability. That is a big issue here

[@eh1702]

Explain the reason that law was created.

[@Bionic_Viking]

@@eh1702 I have to explain common sense to you?

[@eh1702]

@@Bionic_Viking You can’t explain why NOT use weapons to stop Russia that are stockpiled specifically to stop Russia.

[@e-bikefulltimecitytranspor3552]

Russian bots