11. Monopoly I

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 5. 06. 2024
  • MIT 14.01 Principles of Microeconomics, Fall 2018
    Instructor: Prof. Jonathan Gruber
    View the complete course: ocw.mit.edu/14-01F18
    CZcams Playlist: • MIT 14.01 Principles o...
    In this lecture, Prof. Gruber takes what the class has already learned and applies it to more realistic situations, specifically monopoly profit maximization and welfare effects.
    License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA
    More information at ocw.mit.edu/terms
    More courses at ocw.mit.edu
    Support OCW at ow.ly/a1If50zVRlQ
    We encourage constructive comments and discussion on OCW’s CZcams and other social media channels. Personal attacks, hate speech, trolling, and inappropriate comments are not allowed and may be removed. More details at ocw.mit.edu/comments.

Komentáře • 56

  • @domsjuk
    @domsjuk Před 3 lety +89

    This course maximizes social welfare! :D

  • @jamescalderon289
    @jamescalderon289 Před 3 lety +31

    18:53 is a good explanation as to why the monopolist will not produce in the inelastic portion of the demand curve. As a PhD student I will say that this is a very popular question even at the advanced level

    • @otajonabduraxmonov3453
      @otajonabduraxmonov3453 Před 3 lety +2

      maybe monopolist willl not produce in Elastic portion, bcs if E>1 he said monopolist will lose money by producing one more unit

    • @bipinmaurya3824
      @bipinmaurya3824 Před 2 lety

      Hi friends. Can you guide me to follow any books along with these lecture

    • @romesaazharawan1617
      @romesaazharawan1617 Před 2 lety +1

      @@bipinmaurya3824 Microeceonomics Jeffery M. Perloff

  • @Itsaboutdee
    @Itsaboutdee Před rokem +13

    I honestly wish he could be my lecturer due to the way that he explains the work and makes use of simple examples that will stick and make things less complicated.

  • @BrunoPeitl84
    @BrunoPeitl84 Před 29 dny +1

    15:07 There is an error on the slide. The demand function is P = 24 - Q, there is P = 24 - 2Q.

  • @AmitSahu-bu4ul
    @AmitSahu-bu4ul Před 2 lety +3

    Thanks for Providing such an Intersecting & Informative Lecture.

  • @brainstormingsharing1309
    @brainstormingsharing1309 Před 3 lety +8

    Absolutely well done and definitely keep it up!!! 👍👍👍👍👍

  • @camilosanchez5696
    @camilosanchez5696 Před 2 lety +3

    This is incredible. Thank you MIT

  • @pmum150
    @pmum150 Před 3 lety +7

    Informative lecture..

  • @radhikagupta419
    @radhikagupta419 Před 3 lety +3

    great lecture!

  • @shaatiusmani6211
    @shaatiusmani6211 Před 3 měsíci

    Such an enjoyable lecture!! Loved it

  • @gunaypnahova7094
    @gunaypnahova7094 Před 7 měsíci

    Thanks Thierry lecture is benefical for society

  • @gunaypnahova7094
    @gunaypnahova7094 Před rokem +1

    This lecture is beneficial for society

  • @shivpuri5769
    @shivpuri5769 Před rokem +3

    at 15:22 the equation for the demand curve should 24 -Q and not 24-2Q

    • @2l375
      @2l375 Před rokem

      yeah thats what I thought, but no one in the class pointed out ...

  • @cameronhetzler5407
    @cameronhetzler5407 Před 2 lety +3

    This professor is amazing but I can’t help but get Steve Carrell vibes from The Big Short. And I’m here for that!

  • @agboolaalli7124
    @agboolaalli7124 Před měsícem

    The slide on 15:25 reads Demand= 24-2q, it should be Demand =24-q.

  • @hogaak6549
    @hogaak6549 Před 3 lety +5

    Why is the demand curve and marginal revenue curve exactly the same: 24 - 2Q and yet they have different slopes?

    • @ImVedanshAgarwal
      @ImVedanshAgarwal Před 3 lety +7

      Yaa in the graph it should be , Q= 24-P ( look at 15.00 ),
      equations are : -
      P= 24-Q --------eq-1
      MR = 24-2Q ---------eq-2
      Flip the eq---1
      And you get ,
      Q= 24-P ----------eq-3
      So graph is made up of eq-2 & eq-3.

    • @forthrightgambitia1032
      @forthrightgambitia1032 Před 2 lety +1

      @@ImVedanshAgarwal Better to think in the general case. Q = a - bP, P= (a - Q)/b, R = (aQ - Q^2)/b, MR = (a - 2Q)/b. So the slope of the original inverse demand curve -1/b will be = -2/b for any linear demand curve. As he says this would be a different relation in non-linear demand curves. This is because you have both the original price curve (a - Q)/b (dq/dq * P) and the new factor (dp/dq*Q = -Q/b) from the product rule. The -Q/b is EXACTLY the poisoning effect he talks about. Geometrically if you imagine the change, the bounding box of revenue (P*Q) is expanding to the right by the first term and being dragged down smaller by the second... at the limit.

    • @egpalomo
      @egpalomo Před 10 měsíci

      The equation shd be p=24-q

    • @egpalomo
      @egpalomo Před 10 měsíci

      Demand equation

  • @cristianofanvivo7904
    @cristianofanvivo7904 Před 2 lety

    legendary

  • @navinmurarka9613
    @navinmurarka9613 Před 2 lety +1

    In 8:00 there is no need to consider marginal cost zero since we are talking about marginal revenue.

  • @samm1883
    @samm1883 Před 2 lety +2

    There’s nothing else to do in Orlando are you serious 🧐

  • @agboolaalli7124
    @agboolaalli7124 Před měsícem

    I'm happy I spotted an error in one of the slides. How do I give feedback to the professor?

    • @mitocw
      @mitocw  Před měsícem

      ocw.mit.edu/contact/

  • @jamesazever5907
    @jamesazever5907 Před 2 lety +1

    Beneficial

  • @shabana_04
    @shabana_04 Před 3 lety +1

    At 39:40 are A and C consumer surplus and B,D,E producer surplus??

  • @ericcarson342
    @ericcarson342 Před rokem

    Is this principles? This lecture seems more advanced than beginner level.

  • @morninglory8988
    @morninglory8988 Před 3 lety +3

    19:24 I think the Professor said it the other way around. Monopolist wants to be at the elastic portion of the demand curve.

    • @vaibhavkeshari9620
      @vaibhavkeshari9620 Před 2 lety

      Inelastic product demand is good for producers, elastic product demand is good for consumers.

    • @MichaelTaiwanese
      @MichaelTaiwanese Před 2 lety

      I think the reason monopolists favor to be at the the elastic portion of the demand curve is because they get to maximize their profit. It is not contradict to the fact that at the same elastic portion of demand by producing more will the monopolist lose profit. Monopolists don't produce at the inelastic part of the demand curve simply because the outcome is not optimal profit maximization EVEN THOUGH they will get more profit by producing more. Therefore, I don't think the Professor's lecture is wrong. *If I am wrong feel free to correct me.

    • @ooopni
      @ooopni Před 2 lety

      Absolute Value

  • @hogaak6549
    @hogaak6549 Před 3 lety +3

    The Prof. is not very explicit regarding change in R/change in Q. Revenue is PQ. Differentiating Revenue with respect to Q gives the result
    in 11:22.

    • @apnaustaad9818
      @apnaustaad9818 Před 3 lety +1

      He is only trying to make things clear by graphs and physical interpretations. His explanation of the equation says it all! Mathematics is only a tool

    • @suppandi1000
      @suppandi1000 Před 3 lety

      The mathematical aspect in his class is covered mostly by TAs, not the professor. He relies more on intuition.

  • @martingenet8799
    @martingenet8799 Před 3 lety +2

    at the end, when he discussed super market prices, he jumped to some conclusion about charging a lot bc people have to walk but that's incorrect. almost any time a company has a real estate cost (like rent for a super market) the rent is way higher in cities. this requires a greater markup.

    • @jamescalderon289
      @jamescalderon289 Před 3 lety

      Not really, super market's in the city can sell more quantity due to their location, and the fact that they sell more in turn drives the rent up

    • @martingenet8799
      @martingenet8799 Před 3 lety

      @@jamescalderon289 i realize rent is a product of opportunity but that doesn't mean the rent is not the cost they need to cover before they make a profit. even if people bought less on each trip if they came back more frequently bc they still consume as much it would not be a big deal if instead of one big shopping trip per week they broke it down to 2. you can try to argue economies of scale like costco, as though customer by each item in bigger quantity, but not if they are buying the same pint of ice cream in both the downtown and the suburbs and that pint comes from the same distributor.

    • @jamescalderon289
      @jamescalderon289 Před 3 lety +1

      @@martingenet8799 they need to ensure they will be profitable in order to set up shop in the city however thats not what causes the mark up in cities. Products tend to be more expensive in cities due to higher demand

  • @rain7096
    @rain7096 Před 5 měsíci +1

    👍

  • @uditabhattacharya2824
    @uditabhattacharya2824 Před 5 měsíci

    PROFIT MAX ONWARDS

  • @HonestFranklin
    @HonestFranklin Před 2 lety

    Financial accounting, cost management, financial management, tax accounting, commercial law, economics and business administration. Supplementary materials include lectures on commercial law, economics in one book, financial accounting notebooks, and tax law notebooks. The rest is the same problem-solving method.

  • @humblefool
    @humblefool Před 3 lety +2

    The professor came to India as the first BC flight!

  • @swapnilukey8412
    @swapnilukey8412 Před 3 lety +1

    oneplus price discrimination in India vs US

  • @Phil_D_Waller
    @Phil_D_Waller Před 3 lety +4

    isnt the government in a fiat issuing country a monoplist

  • @josefloresmogollon4737
    @josefloresmogollon4737 Před 2 lety +1

    33.57

  • @abhisheksinghasia
    @abhisheksinghasia Před 2 lety

    I can charge for one product better, that's me ! Individuality 🇮🇳

  • @alonsosevilla2301
    @alonsosevilla2301 Před 2 lety

    The deep income parallely moan because smile electrophoretically march onto a uttermost barometer. filthy, minor celsius

    • @chappie3642
      @chappie3642 Před rokem

      Yo that's cool man but you are you gonna pass that shit?