LIVE: Trial of ‘Rust’ armorer begins in Alec Baldwin shooting case
Vložit
- čas přidán 8. 09. 2024
- Attorneys make opening statements in the first trial related to a fatal shooting by actor Alec Baldwin during a rehearsal for the film “Rust.”
Before Baldwin’s case progresses, the movie's weapons supervisor Hannah Gutierrez-Reed is being tried on charges of involuntary manslaughter.
#alecbaldwin #rust #filmset #santafe #news #live
Baldwin is not really responsible, period. Her defense lawyer says that Baldwin was a producer yada yada, but his producer title was only honorable! Meaning, that he was only given one because he was the star of the movie, a big Hollywood name, so he naturally brought money-power into the movie because his name alone attracts more viewership and promotion, but that is it! And this is usually how actors end up with producer titles: it's only honorable and superficial, and they don't have any important, real obligations as producers!! Unless they are really producing the movie like Brad Pitt does through his Studio Plan B, and still only those movies that he is interested in producing on a real, serious level!
She was the armorer, it was HER job to make sure live rounds were not on set! Yes, it looks like the whole production was messy and unprofessional, but that still doesn't absolve her of responsibility! If anything, all prop/armor people plus production people, including the assistant director should be punished! Baldwin was first and foremost an actor in this movie - an actor's job is to act, not check and worry about guns! If gun safety was the actors' job, then we wouldn't need armorers on set! But we need them because gun safety and gun training is the armorer's job, period!
if he puts money into the project..he's a producer AND he did put money in..if not all of it !
How do you know that Baldwin didn't put the live round in the gun ?
@PrettyGoodLookin
You weren't there either
What people hardly talk about in this case is the fact that the assistant director who handed the gun to Alec told him that it was a 'cold gun', meaning there was no live ammunition in it! This is further proof that Baldwin is not guilty: Baldwin trusted the words of the person he worked with and who was in the production department and oversaw all these things. So if I have been in this business for several decades, like Baldwin and the director's expert/assistant tells me that it is a 'cold gun', then I trust him, just like Baldwin did, because I have no reason not to trust him, because words indicate that the person giving you this weapon has checked it. So why would Baldwin further check this gun if the people who handled it told him it was a 'cold gun'? This is the whole point: the production people whose job it was to prepare this gun told Alec that they had done it!! So they lied because they didn't actually check it! This fact alone exonerates Baldwin, period.
Key being-The protocol is *****NOT for the AD ****to hand him the gun, EVER 🎭🚫🫣
Baldwin accepted the gun from the AD. Baldwin accepted the word of someone other than the Armorer and didn’t check the gun. Three wrong moves.
Looks like they cleaned her up out of her purple and yellow hair she looks like she might actually be sober
Looking pretty cute ngl
She brought the live rounds to the set so she’s more responsible than Baldwin.
This! Also, Baldwin is not really responsible, period. Her defense lawyer says that Baldwin was a producer yada yada, but his producer title was only honorable! Meaning, that he was only given one because he was the star of the movie, a big Hollywood name, so he naturally brought money-power into the movie because his name alone attracts more viewership and promotion, but that is it! And this is usually how actors end up with producer titles: it's only honorable and superficial, and they don't have any important, real obligations as producers!! Unless they are really producing the movie like Brad Pitt does through his Studio Plan B, and still only those movies that he is interested in producing on a real, serious level!
She was the armorer, it was HER job to make sure live rounds were not on set! Yes, it looks like the whole production was messy and unprofessional, but that still doesn't absolve her of responsibility! If anything, all prop/armor people plus production people, including the assistant director should be punished! Baldwin was first and foremost an actor in this movie - an actor's job is to act, not check and worry about guns! If gun safety was the actors' job, then we wouldn't need armorers on set! But we need them because gun safety and gun training is the armorer's job, period!
Let’s listen to the entire trial before we assume guilt. Everything they claim (both sides) must be proven. It’s only day one.
Exactly end of story
All you have to ask is What is your job as Armorer, there should be no live guns on the set (that's the Armorers Job end of story lock her up?)
Seemed like a real nickel and dime production.
The day this happened, I called a friend who's been a stunt man for 30 years. He said a live round should be nowhere near a set. A live round introduced into a scene was beyond imagination. Then he said, professional stunt people won't even point a rubber gun at another human being. They figure if you won't point a rubber gun, then you'll never point a real gun, because even blanks are potentially dangerous.
Mama told me to never play with guns. Hollywood does all the time.
The fact people are blaming Alec Baldwin is wild...
Why is the female lawyer wearing a costume?
She was spoiled and didn’t appreciate or take her job serious.
Any fingerprints on the live roud casings, especially the one in the fired gun?
Absolutely KEY fact,.. to solving,.. this Mystery !
She was negligent
It was her job to check guns.
However, they all should have asked her,
IS THE GUN SAFE?
All the sudden she doesn't look so woke
I recall many movies where an actor points a gun at a person. "Do you feel lucky?" All the mote reason to triple check your gun.
You had 1 JOB!
The fault was not hers but whoever hired her should be held responsible.
How do you figure that? She was hired to ensure safety of all present and failed as she brought live ammo on set, or, at the very least, failed to check it before using it.
Wow. After. Taking out piercings,. Hiding tatoos, dyed, hair. And makeup. Shes cute
I wouldn't trust her around Guns. But she's pretty
I thought she was cuter before all 5hat was removed. She looks like a boring middle class kid now.
Why is the camera only focused on the defendant? I want to see the whole court room. Horrible work camera man.
She should of plead guilty and stop passing the buck
Can you say scape goat??
I feel this is going to be a hard one to décide.
I think this one will be the easy case. Baldwin's will be a lot harder.
@@Glubtubis_Wepal69I think Baldwin's case is easier. He pointed the gun and pulled the trigger, violating fundamental firearm safety rules. I don't know what happened on that set or how a live round got into the gun. I'm betting Gutierrez doesn't either.
@@jx14aby you have no idea what you are talking about
@@russelconor8704 Yes I do.
@@jx14abyBaldwin can argue that he was trusting in the armourer, as is protocol.... even if the armourer is a space cadet. If you watch all of the police interviews, it's not too hard to deduce how the live rounds could have ended up in the mix.
she’s 2 years sober…
You know Helena was thinking about her son in her last hour. Too sad.
Maybe clean now but wasn't when the tragedy happened.
I would be too, after this
Ya theres some dummies alrite
She needs to wear bigger jacket that accommodates her larger chest. These tight jackets look like she is Showing Off her bustline. NOT the image that she should portray. I am saying this to HELP her !
Lousy work, AP