Convai GDC Demo: Stormgate Free-form Mission Briefings
Vložit
- čas přidán 9. 09. 2024
- In collaboration with Convai, we are experimenting with the idea of interactive AI characters in Stormgate. This would be in combination with existing pre-scripted and human voice acted scenarios that we are already working on including in the game.
What if you could have a conversation with a character in Stormgate's universe ahead of your next mission? Asking questions about your objectives and gaining more backstory behind a core villain, for example? In this demonstration, we show you what that could look like.
Taking one of our characters from Stormgate's announcement cinematic, Tara Reade - A Xenoarchaeologist, Convai converted her into an Unreal 5 Metahuman asset, training her with some of our lore and character backstory information.
We then have a simple conversation with her, asking some questions about an upcoming mission via voice chat.
A.I. technology and the conversation around it is quickly evolving. At Frost Giant, if we ever decide to implement this technology, we would first need to make sure it makes the game more fun, feels immersive, and also has the blessing of the actors union. For now, we hope you enjoy this experiment, and be sure to let us know your thoughts in the comments.
Wishlist Stormgate on Steam: store.steampow...
It could be cool but I think it's hard to beat well written, intentional stories.
Why not both? The one thing does not has to exclude the other.
It can be like in SC2 where certain responses and main stories are "hardcoded" but if you wanna ask any other question about whatever interests you, you can
Its absolutely not there to beat anything, you see that so wrong. The games story is not interactive but a well written, intentional story but for side dialogue it offers limitless opportunities.
Instead of a competition, see it as an addition in otherwise neglected areas.
Because resources are finite, duh.
@@PuellaMagiHomuraAkemi
@@HighLanderPonyYT
Exactly, which is why what you write sounds foolish since they can never replace the "well written, intentional story" with just AI
Maybe in 30 years though
I see it more of an addition to well written intentional stories. Sure resources are finite, but the AI wouldn't even need that much. I don't know about the mission briefing but imagine the sc2 NPCs on the hyperion all being able to have conversations with you. Instead of uninspired one liners you could actually talk with them about the last mission or whatever else is happening in the story. Could be amazing.
@@PuellaMagiHomuraAkemi why not in a global between mission hub like the ship in SC2, but for campaign mission I need well written story with lines that can be remembered like in war III
Thanks for decoding the sword’s inscription, now draw a picture of a cat riding a motorcycle in the style of van goph please.
lol
**while naked, cant forget the human side of it
I'm not sure most of us playing would even ask the right questions to make it an interesting addition.
I mean you have a point. I can clearly imagine some simp telling her some erotic stuff
a neat idea, but at the moment I cant see it being more than a novelty. one that isnt worth the effort. at the moment it sounds weird, none of the answers given seem better than a pre written dialog option, and from your description it sounds like the issue of fair payment for voice actors involved *hasnt* been solved
if you can solve the issue of fair payment, I still dont see this being more than a novelty that wasnt worth the time or money
yeah its cool but at this point i feel like the game needs so much work, i would rather they focus on the core game than add this.
I think it would be cool for custom maps, where we could use it to voice briefings. :) Ofcourse we could just use ai voice generators too.
Yeah I'm kind of on the same boat as others, I just want to be told a story and keep it straight forward with some hand written, voice acted dialog exploration (aka Wings of Liberty where you can chat with Raynor, Horner, Tychus) and they feed you some back story, or builds up a characters mystery or motive. I enjoyed exploring the dialog, especially since I was a Raynor fan boy as a kid in Broodwar up to Wings of Liberty.
Not to mention I know it was a template, but I really didn't like the voice for her either. It also sounds very, robotic and unnatural. Just my take though, Cool idea, but not refined enough yet.
The voice isn't a production voice, it's a test voice. Of course it sounds bad.
@@ShawnSatterfieldHence, Template... but regardless you also have to factor in the pauses and unnatural speech into it as well
maybe make if the character had a robot design, it might look less uncanny
I agree. Having the character you interact with actually be an AI would really sell it.
Like an Adjutant, maybe.
"I found an ancient alien sword with inscriptions on the hilt."
"Wow, that's crazy. Do you want to know what it says?"
"No"
in SC2 I would talk to every NPC, and exhaust every dialogue.
With AI generation there'd be no bottom, you have to start the next mission some time 😅
"I found a number of Infernals. 23 of them are fairly close to you."
Guys are you ok?
The technology being demonstrated here is incredible, however, I would still prefer that the game feature real voice actors for this sort of thing.
AI voice software still feels like an incomplete technology and comes of as very uncanny.
There’s no doubt that such technology will be able to do this flawlessly in the future, but it’s certainly not ready for this right now.
When combined the uncanny immersion problems that it presents with the significantly increased maintenance and troubleshooting required to handle the inherent unreliability and ease of user exploitation, including it in the game doesn’t seem like a good idea.
Best reply and opinion in the commentary. 👩🏫👍🏆
As per the FG annoucement:
"and--as Stormgate is a SAG-AFTRA union-backed production--that it (the AI) has the blessing of the union and fairly compensates any of our voice actors involved."
We would never consider this tech as a replacement for real human storytelling or voice acting.
@@FrostGiantStudios Glad to hear that you guys are holding the line and still trying something new. 👍
@@FrostGiantStudios But it still is. You are modifying a characters dialogue to be auto generated and to not coincide with the writers vision. You ask the generated entity about the lore, it will get things wrong or have different answers or have different minuet details that are not purposeful, just apart of the soulless algorithm. Just have multiple choice dialogue trees.
I dom't know how doable it is, but it would be cool if this technology could be put in a free editor. In this way everyone how want to create unique mission can add dialogues/briefing without too much effort.
I think this would be cool if its actually an AI/Computer/Android assistant that you can talk to that is up to date on intel provided by the performers and character driven writing.
I love how involved you guys are with the community. I think Baldur's Gate 3's model of 4-5 prewritten questions with permutating answers are more than sufficient. There's something powerful about talented voice actors and intentional writing that I feel far exceeds the AI experience. It feels a little too much like a call to the Bank voice assistant, at least at the moment haha.
This is one of those things that sound cool on paper because of the AI hype, but isn't really much more than a gimmick in practice
While I like the novelty of the concept in theory, i think I'd rather have dialogue that is built and voiced to be repeated as opposed to the generative ai. Ive been playing a lot of Helldivers 2, and I love how many different dialogue lines were given to NPCs to flesh out the world and the story. But all of those lines have intention behind them on the part of the creators that current AI tools fail to capture.
I love love this game... Please just write dialogue and characters using human artists who have an intention and vision... I would find this feature immersion breaking in any game, including this one. literally no dialogue would be preferable to generated dialogue.
You love this game? Are you a SC2 content creator?
I think what a writer could come up with would be infinitely more interesting than any inane question I would ask. Perhaps if this is going to be used, having it come from a robot character that is designed to be a helper bot or something would make more sense and also help with the delivery.
This seems like a lot of work, for what are just generic info lines that could be written in about 5 minutes.
Couldn’t agreee more.
Feels like it will take 5 minutes to implement once its done. Like that at the start its hard but later once it works you just feed it the information and it will do its job better than you writing lines.
Sounds foolish. @@PuellaMagiHomuraAkemi
@@HighLanderPonyYT
I mean it already works in reality, you can even do it yourself with sillytavern
No generative AI pls
Maybe the team can try to turn it into a experimental addon mod with the quest mission operations and you can go to the operations and collect artifacts, items, skins and mini easter egg stories
I think generative AI is an incredibly powerful tool that should be considered where applicable. This specific example of free-form mission briefings is a cool concept, but I don't think it serves a specific purpose to push the story forwards or increase engagement.
I think if you had a hub like the Hyperion and an actual AI entity there like the Adjutant in Starcraft, that you could choose to optionally talk to like this, it could be a fun distraction and source of info.
I think it's hard to beat well written stories.
Its not there to beat well written stories, stop being so competitive. Stop with this bs about sc2 vs stormgate and so on, why cant you think a little bit wider? Its not a competition.
Main story will stay pre-coded with pre-defined answers and writing and so on but didn't you always wanted to talk more to other characters about the world or their thoughts? I certainly wanted to and for small talk/general talk its absolutely great - its not magically replace the existing story, we'll need some 30 more years for that.
@@PuellaMagiHomuraAkemi ye, agreed. No where do they say they won't have well written stories.
People like to bring a lot of baggage to any discussion about AI. It's a newish thing to people, whatcha gonna do.
I know this is a very demo but had it been for the SC adjutant it would work well, humans don't talk in such manner & tune, maybe have it be a robot character.
I'm working daily with generative AI as well, and the maintenance it takes is huge. There are a number of non deterministic failures that we have to handle, and I think adding a feature like this would not be worth the amount of work needed to support it
Could be cool, if it's just one NPC. Maybe similar to the adjutant in SCII but you can have a conversation and ask her lore information.
This I agree.
If you do something like this, make it separate from all the other characters.
Keep those as written dialogues and have an AI companion/personal trainer in-lore who is in fact an AI companion in real life as well.
That's my opinion anyway.
Voice doesn't sound real
I like so much this if its like an asistent. Like the SC2 terran asistent. Instead of google information you can ask it questions like, what type of unit is good vs that enemy or what happened since now on the history.... idk. The possibilities are unlimited.
If chosen campain is played with infernals, imagin a heavy infernal voice explaining you things that u ask him. That would be amazing.
Okay, the example provided does not strike me as prompts a user would make. Expect users to try to get the AI off topic, talk about ridiculous stuff, etc. Could be fun, but probably outside of its intended function.
I also think it looks fairly sterile. I think that can be solved by not using a humanoid will full body animation. An adjutant like robot with fitting voice is an obvious choice, or a voice in your head kind of deal for other races if applicable. Think that would vastly improve the presentation.
That said, this should not be more than your mission briefing person. A storyline should also be present and voice by real actors imo. If you make an adjutant thing to talk to, and if its worth the effort, sure why not. Im neither for nor against. Could be a fun novel toy. Make sure it accepts text prompts though, mics aren't a given.
Now, this thing would be amazing for singleplayer though, if you could talk to your ai allies ingame to communicate strategy. That would be super awesome and more than just a quirky novelty for mission briefing, such campaign ai would make stormgate really stand out.
Just my raw stream of thought.
I love the free-form mission briefings! It reminds me a lot of Command & Conquer back in the day, thanks Frost Giant! ♥
The inscriptions say "What is ligma?" Very interesting. Do you have any other inscribed artefacts for me to decode?
Really cool and unique idea
Has alot of potential and will make missions much more exciting,
especially if the mussions have a lot of details and secret quests
The challenge will be really the voice acting in a fair way as Tim mentioned
Do not add this. Pay voice actors to contribute their art for a well written and handcrafted story and scripts. AI explanations will be so boring and vague. Please just write good scripts by hand.
As per the FG annoucement:
"and--as Stormgate is a SAG-AFTRA union-backed production--that it (the AI) has the blessing of the union and fairly compensates any of our voice actors involved."
We are firm believers in human storytelling-with human writers and voice actors shaping our setting, characters, and storylines. We see there being some potential here to deepen a players’ immersion with technology, but we would not pursue using this tech in our game unless it looked and sounded better-and won’t consider it at all without the blessing of the voice actors union (SAG-AFTRA).
@@FrostGiantStudios You say that and then use AI generated voice acting. Meaning you are lying and don't care about human story telling, just technology.
@@FrostGiantStudios worth mentioning that many, many voice actors were and still are very much against SAG-AFTRA's opening to generative AI. Their union's blessing on this topic does not represent the blessing of the voice actors.
@@commanderwookiecopc806 a perfect example of commenting without watching the video~
No doubt an innovative idea and a commendable effort. This is definitely where the future is headed in time. Will be interesting if SG can make it good enough to revolutionize mission designs
This is the same voice used by the AI in Beyond All Reason. It's a start for sure, but I'm glad that this is a union backed project, as I'm not sure in its current state the GenAI would be fair to voice actors, as you already stated. Still looking forward to this game, very much enjoyed the open beta!
It's a cute novelty but I am not sure it's worth the time or effort to raise it out of the uncanny valley. I'd also leave it to depict an AI character over a live organic being such as a human or infernal or whatever the third faction might be.
ye like an Adjutant from sc with this would be cuel I think.
The whole thing could have been a text in the loading screen, wtf are you guys doing with the game?
I like the idea so long as it's more of an "in addition to" the story and the writing that is already there. My worry would be how good the AI will need to be, so it doesn't pull you out of any immersion being juxtaposed next to real voice actors.
It's awesome that you guys are thinking trying something new like this with the Campaign though!
I like the idea of it, as long as it's used to enhance the story instead of a crutch. My strongest advice would be, to use something like an Adjutant from Starcraft, the uncanny feelings would go way because, you feel like you would be talking to an AI, instead of a weird looking and sounding person. Cool concept!
The idea is cool but I find it more suitable for games that are more about interacting with NPCs, like RPG.
An RTS game is about beating your opponent on the other side of the map. I say focus on that
I'm not sure this comment will be read by the developers at all, but!
Generative AI is a contentious topic due to the quality of the output, the safety of data to which the AI has access, the (at times) heavy resource cost of training and running such an AI, and not least the compensation and rights of performers and developers on the project. While it is a comfort to hear the team's concern on the last point, it's far from any concrete plan to work with a union and establish a provisional contract.
That said, assuming the best in terms of accessibility, safety and performance, it would make sense to present the AI as just that: as a machine intelligence, the players interacting with an entity similar to Starcraft's Adjutant. Having a robotic assistant, or even some kind of machine faction might make it a little easier to play with, and the occasional nonsensical output easier to rationalize. I think in that way the team can present this idea and at least not come off as underhanded, trying to "sneak one under the table" and deliver what some might immediately disregard as substandard, hackneyed work --- even if these projects are no simple task, and to imagine this kind of stuff being capable 30 years ago would have sounded insane.
So, it *is* a neat idea, it *will* have some stumbling blocks, but I'm hoping if it is seen in the game, it's presented as an AI *character* (rather than just including "convai" above the captions) so we have diagetic feedback that the output might be wonky or unpolished. Also, allowing for text-based input would be very nice!
Cool for custom maps potentially? Mostly though Stormgate seems like a weird fit for generated NPC responses
tru, dat be cool. 😀
It seems most AI used like this tend to break immersion quickly as most people want to limit test it and it usually goes along with what gibberish you say, even if it contradicts the story. Like, "We need artefact X and it is in the enemy base." "Oh actually, that's just a replica. I have the real one in my shoe." "Oh, very good. Then there is no need for blood to be spilt." "..." "Now go down and get that artefact! We believe in you!"
nope, don’t do it.
roll back these plans
It's cool that you could do this. I don't think it'd more than a gimmick, but still.
That said, this could have a place in the game. Designed right, maybe there's an oracle (robot or alien, to help mask the AI weirdness) you can ask about the lore. Asking the right questions could give you different insights.
A robot to discuss lore with could interesting, especially if it has access to everything known at that point in game.
I think this gonna be the future, but the future isnt now. :D
This is neat, but if players ask off-topic questions, which they will, the AI can only give answers within the context you've given it. In that case, I feel like it'd be better, and make more sense to have dialogue choices that you can ask a voiced character to gain further context.
I can only see bad scenarios coming from this, such as the AI getting confused and giving inaccurate information and lore regarding your setting or the following level, which again, can simply be mitigated by not using it in the first place.
The only instance i could consider this useful is outside of story mode and more into learning about the universe of this game and corresponding history
1 NPC for this would be cool, like a bartender u see often enough since they know a lot of stuff. If then it goes well, sure, might be fun to include more
This sounds really cool.
Mixed opinion. The voice acting and writing quality demonstrated here is not on the level of what you can achieve for sure, but it's an interesting concept for a niche purpose such as an assistant robot.
Even if it doesn't work out, I love that you're trying new things to be innovative even in places where we don't expect a RTS to go!
I personally think that it could be very cool to explore this kind of thing in games. It will be more and more prevalent going forward. I can defiantly see the potentiality even though it is not still here.
I’d say keep working on it! It is a great idea!!
Please don't add this
this sucks
This is crazy man I love, one idea tho, imagine having someone with the voice of Captain Price briefing the mission to you and if you ask a dumb question from the commander it should also say something like "get it together soldier we are in a war" or some other rhetorical rude answers 😂😂😂😂
I wouldn't use this on a human character as AI dialogue is still a bit uncanny compared to a real human but it could work well on a robotic assistant.
I think a much better item would be good thematic text-to-speech, specifically to allow people using the editor to add dialogue much easier, though I unaware how good TTS is at the moment
This could really be great for a lore robot by leaning into the roboticness of it; voices in the style of the female robot in the SC2 command centre, or for horror games Shodan or GLaDOS.
But it really feels like it would only work for dry emotonless info dumps (like lore or mission briefings) otherwise think for real people, emotive performances, and writing the technology nowhere near good as the real thing yet.
I was actually going into this video with an open mind but this is actually lagging behind current AI technology. Unfortunately this would be impressive a year ago.
Don't worry if it doesn't look too compelling. This is a marketing stunt. They just need to get on the AI hype train. I can imagine it could be useful for example in the actual match where you would be like. "F*** what is this damn thing killing my units? How do I counter it?" And this fella shows in the bottom like. "Hi there, you can build X to punish them for massing one unit type." Now that's a useful AI feature!
I am a bit saddened by the fact that I got so used to studios overpromising and underdelivering, that a developer sincerely saying "we don't know if we can add this to the game" was a surprise.
Its a really cool idea but im worried the characters wont feel quite as special without the human touch. It will be very cool if this tech makes it to the custom maps though
If you do this, do it with a robot character or interface. A human would never communicate with me like Siri or Cortana.
95% of the comments are missing the point. This is not replacing the written story narrative nor is it replacing the voice actors in important moments of the game. Its literally just that you can talk to a character before a mission and ask it questions about the game and the story in case you forgot something or are interested in a more detailed description. Just like when games have all the "what is this" dialogue options but you can ask about anything. Another thing people are saying is that it sounds and looks unnatural well no shit this is a technical demo from a pre alpha game. If they put it in the game, you can safely assume it will look and sound better. Very cool idea IMO although most players will probably not ask anything so idk if its worth the development time.
I think it would be a really cool way to put in an AI robot helper sidekick into the game. Would actually make it feel immersive like you were actually talking and getting help from them.
But for an RTS i dont see this more than a gimick. Unless the annoucer was the ai and actually giving you dynamic call outs based on what you had vision of the battle field. Something that couldn't be scripted. I personally wouldnt appreciate the amount of time and money it will cost to make it good.
It's useful for the map editor and custom user campaigns to generate their own voice content
An adjutant style character could work great with this idea I think.
This is just the dialogue wheel from Mass Effect with a creepy voice actor.
Its too early for the tech. It doesnt feel natural, the responces are generic and uninteresting.
In a couple years when ai voices and text generation gets better it could be really cool. I could imagine having a long conversation with Horner from sc2 or Thrall from w3.
AI voices are better now, only that this is a beta, and the "real" voices will come in time.
Implementing an AI writer would still require a competent writer to edit and tweak the lines, in which case why not just have the writer write a compelling story? The example provided sounds stilted more than anything, and feels more like an in-world wikipedia text-to-speech than a character with a conversation.
I know people HATE anything AI related (I'm mostly in the same boat), but not all of it so bad. In this case, if it's just an additional feature instead of a total replacement than I think makes it more acceptable. I'd be lying if I said I wasn't a bit curious to play around with it, it could be fun. Although, I can already imagine that the AI reactions will be rather lifeless or buggy.
Neat tech demo, but it will need to be a lot more polished before I think it's ready to be included in a shipping product.
I feel like this tech coukd be better user as a way to have the players interact with their adjutant. IE, in-game, you ask your adjutant to tell you how many workers are idle and it responds. You ask it a specific build order suggestion and it responds. But dialogue options? Nah, I don't feel the tech is there quite yet, and I totally see this devolving into people asking weird questions and saying really spicy and NSFW things.
Yeah, I'd be more excited about voice controlling my base.
Instead of hotkeys we could go "build x" then place it.
It's cool, I would want the voice acting to sound more human though.
A massive scope of player agency is vital for a successful RTS. It also requires tight narrative control in order to keep the game's story impactful.
AI is a fantastic frontier for gaming, especially in the roleplaying genres - I would like to see more before deciding if this would be a distracting element.
I think this tech has incredible potential but this was a poor use case of it. I feel like a mission brief like this would always be significantly better if it is pre written by a human. However AI NPC conversation can be an incredible tool for immersion in between missions. Being able to have conversations with characters about whats going on in the world sounds really interesting. I'm thinking about the NPCs on the Hyperion in the Wings of Liberty campaign for instance. A lot of them give you comedic or mildly interesting one-liners when you click on them. But imagine you could have a lengthy conversation with Ariel Hanson about her commitment to the colonists and how she thinks a Zerg virus could be cured. That might influence my decision about the Haven mission and could make the consequences of that decision much more impactful. Or just having a very interesting conversation with Stetmann about the artifact. You could talk to Swann and learn more about his past with Raynor. The possibilities are endless.
This can be a Feature that is really cool but it should be just a Trivia side thing not the main breefing i would say
A.I feels unatural, please don't !
A.I should stay away...
Похоже на озвучку из Subnautica, топчик!)
Привет из России!)
I kinda don’t see any thing that this can adds to the game experience. Like there’s already extra descriptions and info that some player read and some ignore and this is just that but with voice.
How about no? How about you give us all the useful information in prerecorded messages or text, or even a guidebook that comes with the collector's edition?
Cool, but I think you should definitely focus on the gameplay now, no story mode will save the RTS game if it's not fun and competitive to play
Yet the majority of players play RTS for the campaign or vs AI.
@@lordzeolite This is not what brings RTS popularity. Stormgate will be dead without engaging multi, no matter how great the campaing will be
My concern is that including this makes the game online-only. It would be bad for game preservation.
But why?
What does this solve?
Was having AI in the game somewhere a requirement from an investor or something?
It's more of a curiosity and novelty. Not so much to solve any problem. It's a new toy, might as well explore what it can do.
No where do they say they're replacing written story or voice actors with this. As an extra feature ontop of a well crafted game it could be fun I think.
I think it need more work to feel a bit more natural (as is the case with most generative AIs) and also would suggest that an AI character, someone from a command console or something is powered by Ai, like terrans adjutant or something rather than a humanoid person in game being voiced by ai and giving mission briefings.
Best of luck and keep the goodies flowing
Could be fun. But, speech to text converters are good now?
could be a cool side thing, but not a primary focus. Optional maybe. another thought, as the game goes on it gets better and can provide additional functionality in the campaign or use. idk
The most important is to fix the artivicial voice.
Try out the conversation app feature of chatGPT.
Their voices sound very human, making pauses or stretching words as they think and there is also no monotony in the voice like in your preview.
Great idea!!!
While I appreciate that you specifically called out the concern of making sure the voice actor get's paid appropriately; A.I development and A.I training in art spaces is an extremely touchy subject right now, mainly because the companies that are pushing them use so much stolen or misappropriated art, images, and voices to train their algorithms. The only ethical way I can see this working is if you designed your own from the ground up and paid everyone used in the training of it, as well as the actor who it's emulating. And I don't think that'd be worth the effort when dialogue trees already solve this problem well enough, while also giving the Voice Actor the ability to properly emote.
Imagine you can have a companion throughout the whole campaign to which you can talk to about your experiences during missions, findings etc. It remembers everything you have talked about with it previously, and can refer back to previous findings at any point in the story. That is a concept that is worth exploring and will definitely be in many games in the coming years.
Do you think this might lead to conflicting information between different players' games? On one hand it could be cool to see how different players' game worlds are explained differently by the characters (sort of a mark of the unique impression the player makes on their game world). On another, I wonder about the possibility of inconsistencies between player's experiences that make story info in new chapters conflict with the info theyve been given through the course of their sprawling conversations.
I personally don't like the generated voice. It may work on songs, but in conversations you can hear that it's generated. Also, it can be very buggy.
The idea is nice. But at least in this video it feals unnatural and the conversation is kinda hollow.
This might work better if the npc is actually some kind of AI.
I don't want to talk with a game. I want to play it.
No, just no...
I want well written and well acted dialogue, not this...
Is it interesting, sure, but I don't want it in my games...
I know and love too many voice actors and narrators to put them out of a job which this will lead to
Honestly when you told me some of the best and brightest from the old Blizzard days were going to get together and try speed running the death of their own little indie title that was Kickstarted and all that jazz I would have said you were crazy.
Here we are in 2024 watching some of the best and brightest from the old Blizzard days speed running the death of their own game. I'm used to tone-deaf 20 somethings who don't want to listen to others, but it's weird seeing it with 40-50-60 year olds.
That's creepy AF maybe in the future when this whole thing would feel more natural it might work but not now. Also you might consider making the character your talking to be attractive. I hope this game is not bound by some DEI requirement.
I was so excited for this game! Then i played the betas. I thought it just needs some more work. Then there was a kick starter for a free to play game. It's okay I told myself. Now it looks like this is a technology that most players won't care about. This feels like a waste of time on a project that might not pan out. I just want some hope for this game. Please someone tell me things are going to be alright
I really hope there devs don't do this. For which reasons for sure, but also I don't think there is a way yet to avoid people getting the chat bot to day horrible stuff. Maybe it wouldn't even show up in normal people's games, but you don't want videos of your characters reading mein Kampf or teaching you how to make explosive to blow up infernals or any of the infinite bad things that aren't really moderatable.