i9 11900K vs i9 10900K - Test in 8 Games
Vložit
- čas přidán 7. 08. 2024
- Core i9 10900K OC 5.2GHz vs Core i9 11900K 5.3GHz l 1080p
Ad - 0:00
Games :
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 0:29
CYBERPUNK 2077 - 1:28
Microsoft Flight Simulator - 2:38
Call of Duty : Warzone - 3:32
Red Dead Redemption 2 - 4:40
Kingdom Come Deliverance - 5:47
Mafia Definitive Edition - 6:42
Death Stranding - 7:55
System:
Windows 10 Pro
Intel i9 10900K 3.7GHz - bit.ly/2YcPUkI
MSI MPG Z490 GAMING PLUS - bit.ly/3hsf9Hs
Core i9 11900K 5.3GHz - bit.ly/3foHCiQ
ASUS ROG Z590 Maximus XIII Hero - bit.ly/3m1kZSE
CPU Cooler - Zalman CNPS10X Performa - bit.ly/3f999kE
GeForce RTX 3080 10GB - bit.ly/3hUikXp
32Gb RAM DDR4 3800Mhz - bit.ly/2YmtsEA
SSD - 2xSAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB - bit.ly/2NmWeQe
Power Supply CORSAIR RM850i 850W - bit.ly/3i2VoGI - Hry
![Intel Core i9-11900K + RTX 3090 - Test in 10 Games! [1080p, 1440p, 4K]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/AYsvbxfBCe4/mqdefault.jpg)
Ad - 0:00
Games :
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 0:29
CYBERPUNK 2077 - 1:28
Microsoft Flight Simulator - 2:38
Call of Duty : Warzone - 3:32
Red Dead Redemption 2 - 4:40
Kingdom Come Deliverance - 5:47
Mafia Definitive Edition - 6:42
Death Stranding - 7:55
System:
Windows 10 Pro
Intel i9 10900K 3.7GHz - bit.ly/2YcPUkI
MSI MPG Z490 GAMING PLUS - bit.ly/3hsf9Hs
Core i9 11900K 5.3GHz - bit.ly/3foHCiQ
ASUS ROG Z590 Maximus XIII Hero - bit.ly/3m1kZSE
CPU Cooler - Zalman CNPS10X Performa - bit.ly/3f999kE
GeForce RTX 3080 10GB - bit.ly/3hUikXp
32Gb RAM DDR4 3800Mhz - bit.ly/2YmtsEA
SSD - 2xSAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB - bit.ly/2NmWeQe
Power Supply CORSAIR RM850i 850W - bit.ly/3i2VoGI
In future, can you add the prices in USD (MSRP may be) in brackets after the product name? This way we can easily get to know the price to performance improvement.
can you test i9 9900k vs 11900k
Next 4750G(Vega8) vs i9 11900K(UHD 750)
HI T-G. CAN YOU MAKE A VIDEO WITH INTEL UHD 750 GRAPHICS? PLEASE
How much money did intel pay you to make 11900k look good?
Thanks for listening to the comments and keeping avg fps for the whole segment
guys the 11900k has more cache nad has more kb
@@Hot_Dog2009 dont remember asking that
@@Hot_Dog2009 What? The 10900k has more cache.
Clearly the 10900k build had no RGB with it
Lol
Xd
What?
Funny.
@@bradleymasangkay818 didn’t know? Rgb increase performance atleast another 50%+
For only $100 more, you get 2 less cores! It just works!
But more FPS
Thumbnail shows its 40 dollar extra only.
Don't get MAD get AMD 🙂
@Captain Price that's true lol
@@Dredzys you won't feel 4-5 fps difference, but you will feel 2 less cores and 4 less less threads.
I would still take those 10 Cores from last gen.
But hey Intel, it's just me.
I think their idea is less cores = less heat. But yeah, the 10-core from 2020, will still be really good 6 years from now.
@@tnbn55 wtf is that idea i see no diffrence
@@SpideronOfficial 10000000 cores with 1c
@@Ahmed_onYT what he is saying is that the 10 core cpu will age better, and it will.
Ah yes more power , more heat , less cores for 5 fps , nice Intel !
Procesors are not only for gaming sherlok
Where more power?
@@MrBugl17 , ok so if it is not for gaming ,it is for big workload , good luck work with that gen with less cores and bigger temperatures
@@matteo_petruz1435 many trustworthy sources like Ltt have found that the 11900k consumes around 20% more power while gaming then the 10900k
There are so many comments like this and I don’t really understand, so is it worth it to get the i9 11th gen?
nobody:
Intel: evolves backwards
More like Devolved
@@mutedeternal690 How ? There is improvement in almost all the games.
@@aarizshaikh1379 lmao the i9 10900k has 10 cores and its cheaper and it is equal or better in every game
@@foolishvfx Better in every game ? How ?
10900K is better acording to every important and trustworthy reviewer online such as Hardware Unboxed, Gamers Nexus and some others. Anyway, 11th gen i9 is a mega fail, all but i5 11400 and maybe i5 11600K - depending on your local prices are not worth buying.
This is a real Intel moment.
*ePiC gAmEr mOMeNt*
Dont get MAD get AMD 🙂
@ nice roast xD
anyone with any bit of braincells will know that the 10900k is better in productiviy coz of its 2 extra cores and gaming is like a pathetic draw so unless u need some of the stuff of 11900k like PCIe Gen4 then anyone with 1 braincell in their head will buy a 10900k
or buy amd
lol amd ryezen 7 5800x is better or ties with a flagship core i9 11900k lmao and costs a 100$ less
Ah yes a 6 fps increase for just 40 $
And less cores
And you lose 2c4t Intel have outdone itself. But remember there is also a new logo I think that's the real value for your money
If your using a 10 year old monitor, have to wait for a professional tester to release 4K ultra comparisons for this to mean anything
@@MasterGT1st yep you pay for the new logo hahaha
And more power
10900k 10/20
11900k 8/16'
intel is a meme
Intel is killing itself they just wanna increase clock speed and decrease cores and threads
12900К 6/12!
well said my friend
@@patrickstar514 hahahahha
I see i9 with only 1 core
For MSFS, I recommend flying in the cockpit of the Airbus A320 above a busy city. That's where MSFS relies heavily on CPU to drive the plane's displays and to auto-generate the buildings. It's a really good test for single-core performance.
rdr2 be like: return to 10th gen
Rest All other Games - It's time to upgrade !
@@aarizshaikh1379 not really extra money for just 5 more fps?
and less cores and threads?
@Crzh No I won't upgrade but if you have a less powerful cpu then you should.
@@aarizshaikh1379 Not really. As the 11900k runs more money, is a major risk to oc to 5.2 stable, you'll need a bigger p.s as per cores it drains far more power, and extra heat you'll need a 360m to oc with it.
And this test was done with the 11900k oc 100hz higher as well.
Btw: For 4K gaming these are identical. Also review sites have these as identical.
@@aarizshaikh1379 bruh, better i9 10850k almost same performance but way less money
the extra FPS on the 11900K mostly is from the extra 100MHZ clock speeds
Lol u don't get almost 10% improvement frm 100mhz alone
No, it comes from the new architecture.
@@MrPirateking619 it’s closer to 5%, also new microarchitecture.
@Tanjiro cpu usage also depends on core count. Higher core count a cpu has, the lesser percentage will be utilized by gaming. Threadripper might get 10% cpu utilisation but will still be slower than 5900x for gaming.
@Tanjiro cpu usage is higher on the 11900k because it has less cores/threads. CPU usage is not a good way to measure anything
The improvements in the 11th gen is massive especially at 4:50
lmao
intel was probably on crack when they thought of releasing this gen like this
@@setesheol You mean this processor. i7 is an improvement over previous gen, i5 too.
@@saricubra2867 they messed their flagship cpus up
@@setesheol That 11900K is such a weird improvement and downgrade at the same time.
Why don't you fly over cities and large airports for the msfs clips? Really show the performance for places people will mostly be.
4:51 real oof
3:45 / 4:15
The real deal is the i9-10850k for $400 as its been listed that price at many retailers lately, 10 Cores and 20 Threads that are cheaper than a Ryzen 7 5800x
You should do i5 11400f vs i5 10400f vs ryzen 5 5600x/ ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 5600X VS Intel Core I5 11600K
@@gameseduuudabahia8248 In this 1x1 5600X will win, a test like Adm37 suggest is more interesting, to see the real improvement from 10ª to 11ª of i5.
@@Sokol10 you speak portuguese?
@@gameseduuudabahia8248 5600x costs the same as the i7 11700 here... interesting
I just built my pc with 11900k rtx 3080 and 64gb ram with 2 tb ssd 4.0 it’s fucking awesome and runs any game at all max settings 🔥🔥🔥
10900K owner here. I'll return in 5 years. Let's see if it still holds up then.
if game ever use AVX-512... oh boy
I'm a bit weird tho, i miss my old 8700K. Don't know why but that system was so well balanced. 8700K with 1080 Ti.
My friend with his OC'ed 3770K from ~10 years ago is still running games at high settings 4k ~60fps so yea... see you all in 10 years.
I think the 10900k will be good for years to come. High core count, hyperthreading and decent clocks. Anything from even the 9600 onwards is fairly future proof.
i9-11900K: "I'm the worst 8 core CPU for the price".
i7-9700K: "I'm way worse than you, no hyperthreading" .
Intel Celeron: You f### with me right…
thank you very much finally my request made a video about this, thank you TG
I think it would be nice to make MSFS20 video somewhere like New York city, it is in cities where the components get really taxed in the game.
Brother what version of MSI afterburner you using??
which osd do u use?? can u please tell🙂🙃
8 cores won't last as long as 10 cores. i saw the 10900k beating the 11900k in warzone in another video. Why are these benchmarks showing the opposite results in different videos?
Probably depends on the settings and system. You can milk a lot by tweaking it all. Some people probably deliberately tip results towards one
Out of interest, I assume the 3800mhz DDR4 kit was run with XMP on. Does this mean for the 11900K it was running in Gear 2? Or did you run the kit at a lower speed so that you could keep it at Gear 1?
Great video! What voltage did you need to achieve 5.2ghz all core on the 10900K?
Do you have a 10900k? I can only reach 5.1 GHz stable with a 360 aio. I have a feeling people claiming 5.2 and above aren't testing for true stability. There are some golden chips out there, but 5.2 stable definitely isn't common.
@@maulcs Hi I have an i9 10900KF with an MSI Z490 Tomahawk. I have an NH-D15S. I haven't overclocked besides selecting Game Boost in the BIOS, which I believe sets the CPU Voltage to 1.35V and now I get 5.4GHZ on a single core.
I've come from a 4C/4T 3.75Ghz so am blown away with performance! I probably won't overclock now
@@maulcs Just a quick update, I've managed to overclock to 5.2GHZ all core with a CPU Voltage of 1.32v, hope that helps:)
@@AppleUK2000 Have you ran any tests for stability? You should be using something like Intel Burn Test on very high, and the RealBench stress test while looking for Windows Hardware Errors at the bottom of HWinfo.
@@AppleUK2000
Managed but it probably isn’t stable
Is PCIe 4.0 the differentiating factor? Rerunning with a 2080 Ti might be helpful. Also, since Of Results vary, can you set both to 5.2 GHz?
What's the point? The only significance to upgrading to PCI-E 4.0 is the storage speed. The 2080 Ti will perform about the same on gen 3 speeds, maybe at a loss from 1 - 4 fps
А почему при тесте процессоров почти всегда игры в разрешении FHD? Неужели так трудно убрать нагрузку на видеокарту используя HD и отключая всякие сглаживания? Результат более достоверный получиться... oder..?
Did these tests have resizable bar enabled?
Do you have in 4k gaming?
Can you do Vega 11 vs UHD 750?
we need brand new 8C/16T on the newest architecture on sub $150 already.
I will say this. It's a breath of fresh air seeing Intel use a brand new architecture. Just wish they went with 10nm as planned, since this new design was built around the smaller process. So it's no wonder 11th gen has such small gains. Hopefully 12th gen will bring better performance, but only time will tell.
And as a side note, the 11900k is selling for $1100 on Amazon currently. More than double the launch MSRP of the 10900k, with 2 less cores and 4 less threads. Wtf is Intel thinking? My stock 5600x was $299 MSRP and sometimes beat out an overclocked 10900k. So to charge so much for marginally better performance with fewer cores is rather funny and embarrassing.
Hi, i have core i9 11900k, rog strix 3080 oc, asus rog strix z590-e gaming, 32gb ram, 850w gold and my fps in warzone in verdansk max-160/ min-110, can you ask why or do you have any ideas?
The fact that the 10900K is $409 and widely available makes me feel like Intel is going for the mastermind plays releasing this product. It's a 9900KS for gamers, creatives it may be a different story but man... 10850K for $330 or 10900KF for $370 its pretty much a flip our old flagships into value chips that go up against Ryzen 5000 in performance per dollar
Those power draws!
Only increase in price ?
No cpu power also increase
thanks for the vid, funny how fs2020 is almost twice has hard as any other game. Would be nice to see it flying over a metropolis with bad weather etc.
11900k gear mode?
Haven't upgraded and am still on the i7-5820k.. so based on this would it be better to have 10 cores or 8 cores is essentially what it's come down to, this will be my first upgrade and my instinct says 11900k but after reading the comments now I'm not so sure
what do you all think?
I could’ve gotten either and I went with 10900k. Very happy with that, more future proof.
You probably already decided but 10th gen definitely.
I highly doubt that u use CPU Cooler - Zalman CNPS10X Performa as u listed in the descb.
Too bad, it's the end of the winter, Otherwise, I will buy i9 11900k and use it as heating device in my room
Can you try it with the Gen 4 M.2 installed and see what the difference would be?
Nothing take advantage of gen 4 except if you do photoshop projects.
mem is gear1 or gear2?
HI T-G. CAN YOU MAKE A VIDEO WITH INTEL UHD 750 GRAPHICS? PLEASE
Hope 12th gen'll focus more on the multi-core aspect
Intel said that there 11gen is just a gap filler and 12gen would be released soon this year which will be based on 10nm .The name is alder lake s
This man predicted future
just frequency difference I think. Please OC 10900k to 5.3 ghz , then compare both
so what’s the conclusion?
should I go for the 10900k or 11900k cause I’ve been thinking which one of those to get for my 3090.
Go with 10900k, 5fps difference but 10 gen has 2 more cores and 4 more threads which is much better if you run something in bakcground
@@Rosiaczek alright, thanks man.
how did you overclock ram to over 9ghz
Bro on side write in which setting you are playing
Should I go for an 9900k or 10700k I can get one roughly the same price??
czcams.com/video/Xp9SFdAEUKM/video.html
theyre the exact same cpu just different sockets so go with the one that ur mobo u plan on getting supports
10700k, 9900k is worse and it is a dead en
Can you test uhd 720 pro? Now gpu too expensive.
can you do the rx 480 test? Please!)
11900k > 10900k -- 1080p -- 1% fps
0% -- Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 0:29
-1% -- CYBERPUNK 2077 - 1:28
14% -- Microsoft Flight Simulator - 2:38
-1% -- Call of Duty : Warzone - 3:32
1% -- Red Dead Redemption 2 - 4:40
0% -- Kingdom Come Deliverance - 5:47
4% -- Mafia Definitive Edition - 6:42
3% -- Death Stranding - 7:55
2.44% -- 1% avg (0.83% without MSF)
-1% -- Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 0:29
-9% -- CYBERPUNK 2077 - 1:28
46% -- Microsoft Flight Simulator - 2:38
0% -- Call of Duty : Warzone - 3:32
2% -- Red Dead Redemption 2 - 4:40
3% -- Kingdom Come Deliverance - 5:47
1% -- Mafia Definitive Edition - 6:42
4% -- Death Stranding - 7:55
5.89% -- .1% avg (without MSF, 0.13% .1% avg)
7:55 - Now I know why Newegg bundles the i9 11900k with this game.
2:48
0.1% low is extremly increased.
true
Don't ever pay attention to 0.1% margin with higher-end chips like this. Margin of error, nothing more.
It random in this game, it could be in reverse if you run it again.
@@wolker213 Not just in this game lmao. In any. Read my previous comment.
@@DanielOfRussia But accoridng to gamersnexus 11600k's video, better cpu gets better 0.1% low. I don't know if the channel is trustworthy.
I was just curious as to why the 10900k was set to 5.2MHZ and the 11900K was set to 5.3MHZ? I would think that if the 10900K had been set to 5.3 as well, the results would probably have been nearly identical?
100mhz is barely anything, it wouldn't be really any closer while being much less stable and probably giving lower 1% lows
his 10900k can't oc to 5.3g
helo good vids pls try 3080 refference vs 3080 strix thank you
And don't forget the new box!!!
*It's evolving, just backwards*
Why are you testing at 1080p on high settings for cpu tests? Should be 720p low settings since there's games here that are heavily GPU bottlenecked
so pitty that theres no or minor improvement. i hope intel makes it again one day. i miss them
can u do i5-11400f vs i5-10400f
Do these videos please
1-i7-11700k vs i9-10900k 4-i5-11600k vs i5-10600k
2-i7-11700k vs i9-11900k 5-i5-11600k vs i7-10700k
3-i7-11700k vs i7-10700k
You can buy a 10900k confidential SKU from Aliexpress for $346, (at current time of checking). Store is called SZCPU Store. Saves you money. I have a rig with one. Solid. It's running at 5ghz at 1.37v. It gets hot but it's custom watercooled. Hits 73C on stress test. Not bad.
Bought 10900k and absolutely happy with it.
Is the 10900k better then the 119k I heard it’s better cause it has more cores
@@Shadowz2X I’m not sure, but I think it is, anyway go for 12900k if you can
@@heartbroken3344 that’s past my budget I just got the 10900k and me and my friend are gunna install it this is gunna be fire 🔥
@@Shadowz2X So how is it do far ?
I5 11400 or ryzen 5 3600 for streaming and editing??
Bro, get the 5600x
@@Thesilentwolf7610 its too expensive in my region
2700x for editing
And streaming too
@@tryingtobebetter2937 go rob a bank
I laughed so hard on RD2 fps. It should be called "Generation Leap" by Intel 😆
Sad but true
Ok so you see the very rare benchmark that has a decrease, while all the rest of the benchmarks have a general increase. Ok. Besides, basically everyone, for months now, new Rocket lake was going to be a dud and a stop gate till alder lake. Like cmon man if you were really expecting anything more, you had to be either be an intel fan boy or really believe in their marketing lmao
@@pranithgeddapu3432 yeah right
@@bradleymasangkay818 wdym. What part of what I said was hard to believe
Amd FTW
Intel WTF ?
Nice 5 fps improvement
Why there is less cpu
you guys I need your help deciding which cpu should i buy (dont care about price)..
i5-11600kf
i7-11700f
i9-11900
ryzen7 5800x.
5800x
And this is the reason why you must always do research before you buy something.
The 11 gen ran at 5.3ghz and 10 gen at 5.2ghz and the 11 gen isnt supposed to go over 5.2 but 10gen is supposed to go max 5.3 but is ok for me
Wait what? How can it give more FPS even though it has two less cores?
Higher core count doesn't mean everything in gaming. Games until today make no use of more than 8 cores. The slight difference in fps is due to slight clock speed increase.
So Basically i9 11900k is an over locked version of i9 10900k with lower cores.It seems that Intel have solved 2+2.
Intel be like:That was easy
We live in times that things dont get better anymore. Its just money that matters
Id really like to see rocket lake overclocked with well tunned ram, ill have it in a few days to actually test out of stock
Not true at all. 10900k is better, period. It overclocks better, too.
@@CrackaSlapYa you have one?
@@CrackaSlapYa theres zero oc results out so either you have one or you have no idea, it hit 7ghz on ln so theres headroom
Next 4750G(Vega8) vs i9 11900K(UHD 750)
Well it's strange to sau which is better, they perform exactly the same, they don't fool anyone with 1-3 fps difference when it's already well over 100fps, but sometimes 11900k consumes less, other times more, it's a bit ridiculous.
what 10900k no work in 5.3ghz ??? comparation not proportional
Test
I9 11900k vs ryzen 9 5950x pls
why?
@@CrackaSlapYa to see performance of both
@@wicked9299 i can tell you now- 5950x wins , at twice the price.
$540 vs $800 haha😆
@@CrackaSlapYa at single core both are same 🤫😶🙄
i7 10700 vs i7 11700 test 🥺
i7 10700 vs ryzen 5 5600X test 🥺
i7 11700 vs ryzen 5 5600X test 🥺
i5 11600K vs ryzen 5 5600X test 🥺
Plzzzzzzz ..............
Imagine if they had of used 10 of the newer core's, but no that's too big of a technological jump, gotta milk it
5.3ghz vs 5,2ghz
150w that's impressive.
And i was thinking that PCIe gen 4 would make a difference... Im happy that i kept my 10900k......
4:55 looks so funny
to make things worse this tiny increase is basically a best case scenario as i really doubt anyone buying a 500 dollar cpu is gonna be running 1080p anyway, 10900k was and still is a way better deal as it still has more cores and threads
-Well what did you get
A slower cpu in multitasking but he is 3% better in video game
Also lower 4:50
Testing Minecraft!
Small difference between them!! i9 11900k should be 12 c/24 t with 24 mb cache memory!!
I hate to say this, but 11th gen seems kinda a "BUST". I mean why would you go for a CPU with fewer cores, for MORE money, and just about the SAME performance as the 10900k? Better IPC? Doesn't seem to be that effective here? BTW great benchmarks, keep it up.
Paying 40 bucks more for few fps, is it worth it?
No it's not worth it, more cores more tabs you can have open in a browser without sacrificing performance + whatever else running in the background. 2 games at the same time? Sure why not, more cores = better.
In the longer term I just don't see the point of getting a more expensive 11th Gen CPU with 2 fewer cores
you used to do i7 vs i9 video🤣🤣
can we see same test mix max details? Set to medium all game with these cpu in useless to find real limit.
it would be a gpu test
@@eres8514 but we can see at max details and with the same GPU which of these 2 CPU will show better frame. This is the goal.
@@valeriogreco5963 yeah but it would be gpu 100% cpu 50%
we need to push other hardware to work at its best, like psu, the cooler, the power bills. dont let them in comfort zone. ty intel
Do the test with i5 10600k vs 11600k
Power draw is higher than FPS jeeZ. I play allot so in overtime i'm saving money with my ryzen.
I know someone who used to be team red and switched to team blue and he confirmed the difference between both sides in electricity costs is extremely small like pocket change! and he's the type that uses the same things for the same amount of time at certain times of the day everyday. So your only saving the cost of a packet crisps/chips per month 👍