Humans Did NOT Evolve from Chimpanzees!
Vložit
- čas přidán 10. 09. 2024
- That humans evolved from chimpanzees or monkeys are some of the most common misconceptions about evolution. But if we didn't evolve from chimpanzees, then how are we related to them?
#clintexplains #evolutionmisconceptions #evolution
I’m starting college this year as a Ecology and Evolutionary Biology major. I’m so happy I found this channel from your main one.
When you notice the dark side of humans, chimpanzees and bonobos, it makes you wonder how 'dark' our shared ancestor was over 5 million years ago.
I also thinking the most agressive animal inthe world is humans
how vicious they must have been for all of us to still act this way is an eerie thought
This is likely linked with war and racism back then a tribe could not trust another tribe as you didn’t know their intentions and often the other tribe looked different physically, tribes that were most on the peaceful side or small and weak were at great risk of being wiped out by another bigger and stronger tribe, wiping out even women and children and also canabalize them, theres evidence of this happening all the time in prehistoric times and even between different human species, cooked and boiled fossils, cut marks resembling butchering, unnatural/human caused trauma on fossils, etc. those were not peaceful hunter gatherers lifestyles or at least not all the time,
@@JunobrightAlternatively, we wouldn’t gotten our better traits from them.
So instead of evolving from Chimpanzees we’re more of a cousin?
Indeed
@@clintexplains5327 but whats the species name of our common ancestors with chimpances and bonobos? Or que dont know that
@@recipoldinasty Identifing the exact common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees in the fossil record is actually quite though. Based on our genetic difference it's expected that our common ancestor would have lived roughly 7 million years ago give or take, and it was most likely in Africa since both chimpanzees and humans originated there. A fossil ape that is often speculated to be very close to our common ancestor with chimps is the Sahelanthropus. However not everybody agrees that it's closely related to us and chimps, and some propose that it might be closer to gorillas instead. Even if it's close to our common ancestor with chimps and bonobos it still would be hard to tell based solely on anatomical features of the skeleton (which isn't even complete) whether it represents the actual last common ancestor or if its early member of the chimp and bonobo lineage or an early member of our own lineage. The best way to test this would have been if we could analyze it genetically but unfortunately dna doesn't usually persist for that long.
@@clintexplains5327 why is our blood sweat and tears the same salt ph level as the ocean? Are humans oceanic?
no we came from monke adam and eve is a myth
My understanding is that we evolved from some thing that is now extinct that was similar to a chimpanzee, but walked on 2 feet
Thanks for sharing this. I think the main reason why most people deny evolution is because of this misconception
"ThEn wHy ARe ApEs STiLl aRoUNd?!" Is never not a stupid question, yet they still say it. That or they say monkey, which is just wrong.
Well, the MAIN reason is religious brainwashing. Then they'll say anything dumb to undermine it.
@@SweatierAcorn if you want to say atheist lies, then go ahead, just accept it, we, didnt, evolve, from, apes.
@@SweatierAcornhumans evilved from a common ancestor between chimps and humans and not directly from chimps
no, the main reason why people deny evolution is because it is not true. We are created beings IN the image of God and other animals are NOT. not to mention that the whole thing about animals being around millions of years ago is total BS.
Thank you so much for approaching these topics the way you have. Starting from the misconceptions and untangling back from there has been a wonderful exercise in understanding those that don't seem to understand.
I appreciate how easily the information is presented. Thanks!
You're very welcome! Thank you for the positive feedback :)
Sadly that's actually a problem because it's extremely reductionist ,if you know anything even about genealogies you will see how complex they are.i could also just draw such a will picture and expect you to believe it but when it comes down to actually tracing your ancestors in reality it's quite a bit more complicated.
I have found the channel we didn’t deserve but we needed.
Great to see you now have grown enough to have two channels Clint!
Silly Creationist question:
If Man is descended from apes why are apes still around?
Because Man didn't descend from any of todays Apes . The primates that exist today including man share a common primate ancestor that existed millions of years ago.
I came for the reptile reviews but stayed for the science:)
Glad you touched on cladistic classification systems. Most people will not be familiar with cladistics.
it makes me sick when scientists sequester common language terms to mean specific categories that they make up and then scold the common man for "misusing" the language
The human really looks out of place in that chart.
2:26 I tried to explain exactly this to my sister who is a very strict christian and asked how we could have evolved from monkeys if there are still monkeys around today.
btw do I hear Gus Gus scratching in the background?
In fairness, just because some populations of a group evolve into something noticably different from their ancestors, that doesn't mean that other populations can't continue on in a similar form to those ancestors.
@@clintexplains5327 why is it then we haven’t observed or noticed other instances of evolution taking place in the monkey groups?
@@VashTheDamnFiend They evolved into their respective species. Baboons also evolved from monkeys, as did howler monkeys and the rest.
@@VashTheDamnFiend we have actually seen something like that in dogs if u look at some dog spices they didn't exist 200 years ago but artificial selective breeding done by us has created different spices of the dogs which is a great example of evolution
@@sanjivsharma333 wolves and dogs are much more similar than monkeys & humans
These videos are so great. Thanks Clint!
You're so very welcome!
I'm going to save this video to post it whenever someone comments "if man comes from monkey, why is there still monkey?". I apologize for the idiots that might come your way in advance.
can you explain how the first ancestor with our chromosome count bred? evolution happens through mutation so therefore at some point a chromosome mutation happened cause we are different in that manner correct? do you really think a mutation in the dna code happened exactly the same on two opposite sexes of the same animal on the same timeline? thats literally mathematically impossible. and then to think that from those first two with that unique chromosome count nothin ever happened and those 2 survived all mathematical odds against them finding each other attempting to breed remember its not like they know they are different its not like they know to seek each other out. no the whole idea of evolution of new species is mathematically impossible. now we can alter and spread mutations that are beneficial for a species to survive but to think that new species are created through evolution is insane. no evolutionist can answer this. never has anyone ever seen a mutation happen twice in nature, hell we know all bue eyed people share the same common ancestor of the first human with blue eyes the dna has been traced and proven there has NEVER BEEN ANOTHER HUMAN TO MUTATE TO HAVE BLUE EYES it happened one single time in the timespan humans have existed and we who have blue eyes are all related to that human. no something made us thats the best explanation we have. saying humans evolved from another species or that we are related to another species is like saying you can roll a 999trillion sided die to the same number 3 times in a row and then for this to happen to EVERY SINGLE SPECIES lolololololol yall lack critical thinking skills
@@petejones6827 well, it probably didn't happen only once, and it was like how it happens nowadays with people with down syndrome, they are born from people without that condition, but that have something in their genes or in their enviroment that make that condition to appear here and there, several times and without any apparent link. From then, it only depends on two individuals of opposing sex with that condition to happen to mate so that they inherit that trait as well, and since it could have sprouted several times through each generation, the odds of it happening are not bad.
@@james13sylar thats not how mutations happen mutations are not dormant you speak from no knowledge of the subject and just guess. do you even know the probability of a mutation let alone happening twice in the same species at the same time frame? its mathematically impossible. let me say this again there has been one blue eye mutation in all of mans existence it has never happened again NEVER. your gonna sit here and tell me that with those odds of a mutation happening that it happened twice in the same time frame on opposite sexes?
now for your thought it doesnt work we dont have two genes to choose from for chromosome count like we do eye color or hair color there is no recessive chromosome gene there has to be another great ape that had a chromosome mutation of the opposite sex at the same time. and thats just not possible. plus the idea that every single species on this planet had this happen when there ancestral tree split its just mathematically impossible. evolutionists spend more time guessing than thinking
@@petejones6827 you wrote a whole chapter just to explain you don't know shit about evolution 😆and probably believe a invisible sky wizard called a god made people as dumb as tht comment was...n you thought u had a gotcha moment 😆😆😆
@@petejones6827your comment proves that your brain didn't evolve much from the common ancestor with chimpanzee. Still ape brained.
Mostly good video. I have one criticism. You did not include tarsiers in your diagram. Tarsiers share a more recent common ancestor with simians than they do with stepsirhines(including lemurs) so ideally they should be included in this diagram.
Do we have fossil records of what the shared ancestors of humans and chimpanzees might have looked like?
No. Not directly. But the earliest hominids are a good indication.
@@birbdad1842 then there isn’t a link until evidence is found.
@@VashTheDamnFiend To be honest scientists say one thing then suddenly one year later they say another thing then one year later they completely change there assumption.. It’s hard to fully trust them on somethings..
@@Nightstar3242 Why even care. What change on your life is supposed to happen if a scientist says that monkeys share the same ancestor?
We will never found the common ancestor because of how science works. Each new transitional fossil that is found is placed on the tree of life as a cousin, not an ancestor, because we have no way to be 100% sure that the species we found is the exact species of the common ancestor and not a very close relative to that yet-to-be-discovered species. Methodolically, even if we found the common ancestor, we will never place it as the common ancestor. That's why Homo erectus, which is very probably a direct ancestor, is considered in rigorous phylogenetic trees as only a cousin.
Now if you wanna know what the common ancestor might have looked like, Sahelanthropus might be either the closest thing we ever find to a common ancestor.
I'd like to know more about the common ancestor, what it was what it looked like, what the evolutionarily process from that ancestor to us looked like so on.
Personally I love this second channel, I'd just like if you shared some more details on topics you discuss. For example I think a mention of the denisovan and neanderthal could have been useful as I was curious as to how they may fit on that phylogenetic tree personally. Just food for thought of course, I adored the video and have added this second channel to my subscriptions ❤️
I agree, but at the same time I use these to homeschool my son and if it got much deeper I think I’d lose him even more. Also at the same time, he astounds me with his comprehension on the daily so…
If you want to go down a rabbit hole, look up “why humans are fish”
I had thought that if you even look at the skeletal anatomy of Australopithecus, it was clear that its ancestor, although not belonging to either of the modern species of chimpanzees, was still so similar to a chimpanzee that this is what we would call it if we could see it.
There is 1 chimp species, the 'other' is the bonobo, a distinct species.
do we have info on those shared ancestors with the chimpanzees? Im assuming they'd be very similar to the modern chimpanzees, at least externally
Lol this information always seems to be missing for some reason… hmmm
Why would you assume they'd be very similar to the modern chimpanzees?
do you mean the "missing link"? There is a whole clade of simians that don't fir with us nor chimps. Also, there's a whole extinct genera of pidedal apes that are near the intersection between us africans & orangutans.
You guys should check History with Keyleigh.
@@VashTheDamnFiendgo find it then. Maybe you're actually the missing link we're all waiting for.
There are a very small number of good sources for science information on You Tube. Clint's Reptiles, and Clint Explains are at the top of the list. While I am not a biology major, I have read almost every essay and book written by Stephen Jay Gould, and Richard Dawkins (as well as many other authors). So I felt I knew quite a bit about evolutionary biology. Yet Clint has taught me a lot. I have a much better understanding after watching Clint's videos. So, I thank you Clint for the effort you put into these videos, and commend you for the good work. You are a very important resource for people wishing to learn.
Loved this video. I wish I had this growing up. But the genetic studies was still new and the placement of our common ancestor with chimps had a broad range from 2-10 MYA. About 5 MYA seems about right with a possible extra 1 MYA of cross breeding (about the same time lions and tigers split, so technically humans, chimps, and bonobos belong in the same genus). Though given new genetic evidence (since the gorilla genome has been cracked) it appears that there might have been cross-breeding with early humans and early gorillas, or a hominin species that was contributing to the gene pool of other hominins and gorillas.
There is no _a priori_ time since common ancestor requirement to place things in the same genus.
They're a cross breeding between humans and dogs. Scientists and historians are ashamed to admit this. Perversion was the result of the species ever coming about.
The first image caught me off guard 😂😂😂
I had no idea that we were more similar to chimps than are mice to rats 🙉
Except we’re not
Think you mean mice and rats are more similar then us to chimps
@@asen1712 That's what she said! Than, not then.
@@VashTheDamnFiendtechnically, we are
@@lapizza7175 does that ring true to you? Is that logically sound?
They say Adam and Eve were the 1st ones But it's not true. It was Daryl and Veronica
There’d be a whole lot of different human species running about or there’d be no primates left. Missing link is a wonderful “excuse” for not knowing. Actually, not having a clue.
It’s insulting to even consider that we’re descendants of creatures that fling their poo for fun.
Although, there are a few folks who…
There were, they died out.
Why would their be no primates left? All primates didn’t evolve with the same population of primates as modern humans.
What missing link? There is already a genus of great ape that is thought to be the link between humans and chimps.
Weirdly, if we see ourselves (humans) as the last true descents of the original bipedal ape, all great apes seem to have descend from us, as knuckle-walking has evolved at least twice (chimps & gorillas don't do it the same way) & the earliest bipedal simians appeared before the primal great ape returned to Africa from the Levant.
Darwin did say that humans were descended from apes in his Descent of Man:
"In the sixth chapter of his Descent, titled On the Affinities and Geneology of Man, Darwin wrote: "There can, consequently, hardly be a doubt that man is an off-shoot from the Old World simian stem; and that under a genealogical point of view he must be classified with the catarhine [Old World monkeys] division . . . But a naturalist, would undoubtedly have ranked as an ape or a monkey, an ancient form which possessed many characters common to the catarhine and platyrhine monkeys, other characters in an intermediate condition, and some few, perhaps, distinct from those now found in either group. And as man from a genealogical point of view belongs to the catarhine or Old World stock, we must conclude, however much the conclusion may revolt our pride, that our early progenitors would have been properly thus designated." Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man,Chapter Six, On the Affinities and Genealogy of Man:Rank of Man in the Natural System, Sixth Edition, edited under Encyclopedia Britannica, Great Books of the Western World, Vol.49, Darwin, William Benton Publishers, 1952, pp.335-336. Darwin further stated this belief on pp.337, "We have seen that man appears to have diverged from the catarhine [African and far eastern monkeys] or Old World division of the Simiadae [monkeys and apes], after these had diverged from the New World division."
Of course he offered no proof of human common ancestry with apes at all.
There is also a popular evolutionist channel called 0:02 / 30:23
Humans Are Apes (& Here's Why) ~ with Anthropologist ZACHARY COFRAN , and the whole idea that humans are descended from apes, a lie, is championed by many in the evolutionist community. So you need to do your fact checking my boy, before committing to the keyboard. Remember, fact check first, then keyboard. Repeat after me, "Fact check first, then keyboard".
Some guy sent me this to prove evolution didn’t exist
like the second channel dude, nice to see you branching out. This is a good fit for you for sure lol
Very simply put. Great video. I love the way Clint sounds like he's going to say the world is flat and 4,000 years old but he's bang on the money. I've had the privilege of visiting Down House and seen the study and cupboard where Darwin stored his manuscript.
Hi @Clint Explains
Good info, can you explain why the gorillas are "past" us on the cladogram shown? What selective advantages do they have that put them there?
Past us?
As far as I know, gorillas being further to the right compared to humans does not really mean anything. You can actually flip the monophyletic clade containing bonobos, chimpanzees, humans and gorillas (humans would then be on the rightmost part of the cladogram) and it would still represent the same phylogeny.
Check out the phylogenetics video to understand it better, but in short, it is just to keep the chart looking neat. Turn it around at the joint with gorillas on the left and humans, chimpanzees and bonobos on the right, and it will be the same, but the chart won't look as good.
PhD zoologist here; the other comments have explained correctly why it's presented that way. BUT, I want to dispel the notion you seem to have.
"What selective advantages do they have that put them there?" Implies 'the more to the right, the more advanced'. This is NOT what phylogenies convey, nor even imply. They serve to show relatedness of organisms, not relative complexity.
It's GAME OVER now for young earth creationism, who denies evolution and our common ancestry.
I encourage everyone immediately to watch the video:
"I Taught an Ape how to Play Minecraft"
The video is showing Kanzi, a 42-year-old bonob with developed cognitive abilities, able to play Minecraft.
Kanzi's ability to learn and play Minecraft is part of his daily enrichment activities at the facility. He can choose when to start and stop playing.
Christopher "ChrisDaCow" Slayton created a custom Minecraft world for Kanzi with larger targets to facilitate easier interaction. Slayton showed Kanzi examples of how to perform simple tasks in the game, which Kanzi quickly imitated and understood. Kanzi received positive reinforcement, including peanuts as rewards, for successfully completing tasks. Kanzi first learned basic navigation and simple tasks, then progressed to more complex gameplay over two training sessions a month apart. Kanzi's inherent intelligence and previous experience with touch screens and lexigrams likely contributed to his quick grasp of the game.
That doesnt prove evolution
B... But monkey plays Minecraft! @@AndyBrownlie
Similar like dogs are not direct ascendants from wolves
eh?
Beautiful. Simple. Elegant. Thank you!
So from that line or branch that split off from a common ancestor , the branch that led to modern humans contains all of " the others " - like the one that " Lucy " belongs to , and then the homo naledi and the homo erectus , on up through to the Neanderthal people ?
Yes
We were born because Eva just sweet home alabama'd her son
Ole Eve was pulling the train … Cain, Able, with poor ole Adam playing caboose …
They ran a train
Hebrews 11:1
King James Version
11 Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.
Damn I love your videos 😄🖖
Thank you!
can a evolutionist explain this to me. when species divide how do they breed? evolution comes through mutation they say so therefore mutations being extremely rare and almost impossible to get the same mutation twice let alone at the same time frame and on opposite sexes. so therfore a mutation happens that changes chromosome count at some point right? how did that get passed on? how did it breed if it cant breed since no other version of if has the same chromosome count? is it impossible that two of the same species of opposite sex had the same chromosome mutation at the same time.
These are great questions and I encourage you to seek the answers from actual professionals and experts in biology and evolution.
@@Dr.Ian-Plect from what i understood tho not every gene has a recessive and dominant gene is that not true?
@-Plect lol i find it funny that before every answer you are a dick first. i asked you a legit question and you start the answer with that shit your a real piece of work lolol
The evolution of humans (and other species) involves complex mechanisms that allow for changes in chromosome numbers and structures over long periods of time. Here’s an outline of how such evolutionary changes can occur despite potential issues with mismatched chromosome numbers:
1. **Gradual Changes:** Chromosomal changes generally occur gradually. Small mutations and rearrangements can be tolerated if they don't severely affect an individual's fertility or viability. Over many generations, these small changes can accumulate.
2. **Balanced Translocations:** Sometimes, parts of chromosomes can break off and attach to other chromosomes (translocations). If these are balanced (no genetic material is lost or gained), the individual may remain fertile. Over time, if such translocations become common in a population, they can lead to a new stable chromosomal arrangement.
3. **Polyploidy:** In some organisms, particularly plants, entire sets of chromosomes can be duplicated (polyploidy). While this is rare in animals, it can lead to new species that are reproductively isolated from their ancestors.
4. **Speciation Events:** When populations become isolated (geographically, behaviorally, or otherwise), they can diverge genetically. Over time, such populations can accumulate chromosomal changes that contribute to speciation. If two populations with different chromosomal configurations meet again, they might be reproductively isolated, leading to the formation of distinct species.
5. **Hybrid Zones and Genetic Drift:** Sometimes, hybrids between different chromosomal arrangements can survive and reproduce. In hybrid zones where two populations meet, there can be a mix of chromosome numbers. Genetic drift and natural selection can then act on these hybrids, sometimes leading to the fixation of new chromosomal configurations.
6. **Human Evolution:** In human evolution, there have been instances of chromosomal changes. For example, humans have 23 pairs of chromosomes, while our closest relatives, the great apes, have 24 pairs. This difference is due to a fusion event that created human chromosome 2. This fusion likely occurred in a small, isolated population where the fused chromosome could spread without causing significant reproductive issues.
7. **Mechanisms to Ensure Fertility:** Nature has mechanisms to maintain fertility despite chromosomal changes. For example, during meiosis, various processes ensure that chromosomes segregate correctly. Even when there are structural differences, mechanisms like synapsis and recombination help align homologous chromosomes.
In summary, evolutionary changes in chromosome numbers and structures occur through a combination of gradual mutations, translocations, polyploidy, speciation events, hybridization, and natural selection. These processes allow species to adapt and evolve while maintaining reproductive viability, even when chromosomal configurations change.
Actually, apes would’ve still evolved from monkeys if “monkeys” are paraphyletic. The paraphyletic group would include the common ancestor of Old and New World monkeys, which was also an ancestor of apes. This would mean that apes would still have evolved from a “monkey” even if apes are not considered monkeys themselves. To say that apes did not evolve from monkeys, “monkeys” would need to be polyphyletic; that is, it would include the living taxa but not be defined by ancestry at all. Therefore, for apes to NOT have evolved from monkeys, the common ancestor of today’s “monkeys” would not be a monkey, but just an ancestral simian. In any case, humans did not evolve from LIVING ape species, and apes did not evolve from LIVING monkey species.
Then where are all the intermediary species in the fossil record? If what you're saying is true, there's be tens of thousands of examples on display in museums, instead we have people like Pierre De Chardin forging piltdown man.
Darwin said himself his theory would be null and void, if the fossil record failed to corroborate his THEORY. Basically evolution is a religion, since one has to trust what people are telling them, instead of having actual proof.
@@jeremyjames1659 Yeah, Piltdown man was a hoax and it was debunked almost a hundred years ago. If you go to an actual museum, you will find fossil examples like Australopithecus afarensis, africanus, etc. There are not 10s of thousands of these fossils because fossilization is pretty rare. But even still we have dozens and dozens of these fossils just for that genus.
Also, I don’t think you know what words mean. Religion is the belief and worship of the supernatural, things like god, magic, spirits, etc. Evolution is a scientific theory that explains how life changes over time and the diversity of life today. Just like the germ theory of disease explains how we get sick.
@@jeremyjames1659 every fossil Is "intermediary"
@@randomusername3873 "Basically evolution is a religion..."
Oh man, that's such a terrible turn of phrase and I hate that creationists have taken to saying things like this, and "I don't have enough faith to believe in evolution," and such. I hate it for you because it's embarrassing, particularly because you think it's such a gotcha.
@@dingdongism.the 2 could not be more different. Religion is based on faith that is not supported by any facts whatsoever..Science is based on where the evidence leads.Evolution has been proven beyond doubt.Very simple life forms became complex over many billions of years and continue today.the beings that watch our sun blow up and die in about 5 billion years will look as different to us as we do to to the tiny creatures that are our ancestors
We are just the same old monkeys 😁 Awesome video Clint, I appreciate your explanations a lot!
But at all times, even when the embryo resembled a worm, it was human in potentiality and character, not animal. The forms assumed by the human embryo in its successive changes do not prove that it is animal in its essential character. Throughout this progression there has been a transference of type, a conservation of species or kind. Realizing this we may acknowledge the fact that at one time man was an inmate of the sea, at another period an invertebrate, then a vertebrate and finally a human being standing erect. Though we admit these changes, we cannot say man is an animal. In each one of these stages are signs and evidences of his human existence and destination. 6
Even if we did why are they still there.
for same reason why you still have british after they turned into americans.
@@spatrk6634 that’s an accent not a species.
@@UndeadNerdT800 principle is the same.
population changes. not entire species.
@@spatrk6634 location change is different
It's the increment of the FOREHEAD above their Eyes' Brows.. the Cerebral cortex... Memory area of the Brain.(!?!)
All the pretty pictures and diagrams are easy to make from one’s imagination. Trusting science today is not like it used to be!
How valid is the following theory: One lineage was believed to have been the evolutionary descendants of Indonesian Homo erectus while the other lineage had evolved from Chinese Homo erectus. Modern Australian Aboriginal people are the result of the assimilation of these two genetic lineages.
That's not a theory. It's barely a hypothesis.
Could you explain 1a and 1b on a tree in the same position?
LMAOO😂... We've all been told a lie… We never came from monkeys. If so, why are monkeys not turning into humans today??? We didn't evolve from nature… We would put here by our god who created everything… I just debunked this whole video
We have same DNA because the structure of the body is very similar.
No, humans and chimps are like horses and zebras, different environmental settings trigger different genes to evolve, so chimps and humans had the same ancestor, while some went on to the grasslands to evolve into us, and others went into the jungle and evolved into chimps
We also share genetics with Pigs. Are we now related to them too?
See if you can connect the dots of your own comment.
Are these assumptions derived from fossil studies too?
Fossil studies supported by genetics analysis.
The reality is that they share a little common characteristics of human beings
Explain why our DNA is fused in such a way its not observed anywhere in nature, only the laboratory
Explain why I can’t see a rinovirus in nature but I still have a cold
Whats the real difference between a gas station and a home. Even though they both are made from the exact same materials, theyre each similar and sightly different ....this is the way i feel about evolution. Dna may be a close in some ways. But were very different.
there's no difference besides the one's defined solely out of culture
We didn’t evolve 100%.
Yes we did
Humans evolved from Homo habilis, to Homo erectus, to Homo sapiens.
I love that video! Keep up with the great work!
Chimps evolved from our common ancestor. The hominon.
The icon has become the argument.
humans evolving from proboscis monkeys or new world monkeys would be more realistic lol
Yeah but we have 46 chromosomes, and those apes have 48. We don't know how it happened, we just say it happened along the way... Modern science, however, identifies these chromosomal mutations in humans as non-benefitial anomalies that hurt the species, yet we don't dare question how we lost 2 chromosomes without issues? Like, yeah, whatever, evolution did it with plenty of time and population bottlenecks...
Ignorance on a plate. The chromosomal fusion has been known about and well-evidenced for decades.
Gosh, I hope people will start to understand that. It's not that hard.
If we evolved from primates then why aren’t there any other primates that look remotely similar to us
Yes this is what I say it’s a theory and it’s WRONG
What do you mean? All apes look remarkably like us.
@@meshal.666 gravity is a theory.
@CajunKing it’s been proven wrong that humans came from monkeys stop being dump do we say that humans might come from whales because they have tongues
Chimps and Bonobos looks like us. Our skeleton is very similar, we all have 5 fingers, nails, can all Carry tools, etc.
Mankind is made in the image of God ,both humans and animals only relation to each other is that we are all made by the same creator who came not only to save mankind but all of creation .
Amen. Keep spreading the truth.❤
Wrong, our genomes are about 96% identical to those of chimps, we can’t be closer to an animal than we already are, because we are animals.
Under almost every metric, we are closer to chimps than chimps are to gorillas, yet you’d gladly call chimps and gorillas “animals”, when chimps are closer to us.
How many monkey human like bodies they finding these days
I’ve seen that bonobo from the poster in one of the recent “Planet of the Apes” movies …
Can you proove our intellect and consciousness come from evolution?
Science doesn't involve proof.
We came from god
You are wrong you has direspect the monke
echo 89 disrespect
@@lexihunnel4024 shut this a month ago you replied a day ago then it turned 5 months so shut you direspect monke + i didnt asked for you to say mind your buisness .
This is stupid, God created us and that's it.
ok
Prove it then.
That’s stupid.
Don't bring religion into that.
Fun fact: everyone is our cousin
nope
@@Dr.IanPlect r/whoosh
@@Stormywingz nope
@@Dr.IanPlect bro is denying on a sarcasm
@@Stormywingz The sewage spewing oxygen thief is muted.
Talking snakes don't exist anymore. That's evolution!
witty
How far behind are we really though? If you think about it determining all the lives and time loss. We're probably so far behind R. Ancestors are probably like thinking. We're ahead, but realistically. We're actually really far behind😅
12 cousins of humans
1) Sahelanthropus tchadensis
2) Australopithecus afarensis
3) Australopithecus africanus
4) Homo habilis
5) Homo georgicus
6) Homo ergaster
7) Homo erectus
8) Homo antacessor
9) homo heidelbergensis
10) Homo floresiensis
11) Homo neanderthalensis
12) Homo sapiens
9 of those _are_ humans.
What were our anchestry?
Kalo manusia kawin sama hewan primata kaya orang utan dan primata lain apakah manusia betina bisa hamil. Atau apakah primata betina bisa hamil. Kalo kawin sama manusia
We have common ancestors. Not descendents of.
Let's wait few million years and we'll see what will happen
Right!
We’re not monkeys we never were stop believing what scientist say they can’t prove a damn thing
whats your evidence against it then buddy
@@dirtysploof5890 what’s
@@dirtysploof5890 God is the evidence.
Scientists have done a fairly thorough job of proving that ole Dylan will never be able to see past his superstitions and his belief in invisible men like Casper the Holy Ghost …
Nobody believes we’re monkeys or came from them. We’re apes, not monkeys. We lack tails.
And evolution is undeniable btw, we’ve seen many bacteria do it, not to mention dogs…
Kalam 8alat too far away to say it chimps aren't directly from humans just common ancestor it's like saying dogs evolve from fish too far away. There weren't any chimps back then. We are more similar to chimpanzee than mouse to rats
Common Ancestor means not human or chimp, obviously modern chimps weren't around, just ancient ape ancestors.
No, it’s like saying dogs came from wolves
LoL... Asians were rather (evolved) from Chimpanzee (black hairs) while Westerners were from... Urang Utang (red hairs/brunette). ?!?
Male Gibbons are Black, while Female is Light Gold colour.!!
Thank you for the video. Are you interested in doing debates on evolution?
why have the apes not evolve to this day
They have.
We're not more evolved, everything is equally evolved, just the things we evolved are more useful than a lot of others.
What in the world. We are Chimpanzees.
Maybe you.. But not us.
@@MrCake-ui8uo no humans are apes
@@MrCake-ui8uo thats what they claim
We aren't chimpanzees but we are still related to them
every decade or so they have different theories
Depends on the subject matter. Theories change only when there is sufficient evidence to warrant doing so. Such is the self-correcting nature of science - always improving, always moving forward.
all and all its still theory@@AlbertaGeek
@@tomeye3111 If you weren't ignorant, you would know that the term 'theory' means something very different in scientific usage than it does in everyday colloquial usage.
But then, if you weren't ignorant, you wouldn't be a creationist.
@@AlbertaGeek ok im ignorant, you cant something from nothing even science proves that yes random molcules created this existence, its one hell of a precise plan
The theory of evolution has been the leading explanation for the diversity of life for over a century.
We are from other planet,we human being is alien.
We was a monkey that evolved simple as
Humans arent apes. Lol only one of those beings in that diagram is wearing clothes people!!!
What a lot of baloney
Of course not, we evolved “alongside” chimps!
Adam and Ewe are not real
😂😂😂
Then you're monkey 😢
I evolved from banana
We did
Thank you