HEAD TO HEAD - RECIPROCATING SAW - HILTI vs MILWAUKEE Sawzall (SR 30-A36 vs 2821-20)
Vložit
- čas přidán 29. 03. 2021
- This head to head comparison is between the HILTI SR 30-A36 RECIPROCATING SAW and the Milwaukee Tool M18 FUEL SAWZALL 2821-20
A break-down of the times:
| 2x10 | 4x6 | Galvanized Pipe | Cast Iron Pipe |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hilti | 14.84 | 11.08 | 39.40 | 1:55.38 |
Milwaukee | 11.48 | 9.84 | 15.40 | 50.68 |
Be sure to subscribe and turn on notifications so you'll know as soon as the next head to head challenge is posted!
=============================================
/ someguywithtools
For more behind the scenes and day-to-day content check out my Instagram page!
=============================================
www.someguywithtools.com
Check out our website for in-depth reviews and high-def pictures of all tools I get my hands on! Striving to provide honest and straight-forward reviews and opinions - as if you're hearing an opinion from your coworker while on the job site. Less press release regurgitation and more trustworthy hands-on experience!
=============================================
GEAR I USE:
JOBY GripTight PRO 2 GorillaPod bit.ly/3fFWibq
JOBY GorillaPod Arm Kit bit.ly/3nSD4lC
JOBY Wavo bit.ly/363Vzxg
JOBY Wavo Mobile bit.ly/2V2M3Ek
============================================= - Jak na to + styl
My buddy has three of these milwaukees. They have all gone back to Milwaukee for trigger fixes. The 5 year warranty is awesome. Here is the funny thing though. I have one Hilti,haven't had to send it back. Saw shows up every day to cut whatever I need for the last 5 years. I can't use a saw when it is in for repairs.
Milwaukee 💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻
Hard to find a Milwaukee tool that disappoints!
Nice video brotha :) BUT Totally not correct .i was laughing a lot when i see that .HILTI SR30-36 is way stronger than this milwaukee.SUPERSAWHZALL is the fastest in Milwaukee family.in this case HILTI 36v is way stronger and faster .try to use ur self when u compare them ,because they weight balance is not the same in different recip saws :)
Stronger, yes. Faster, that's debatable. If you look again, there is a 10 pound weight hanging from the saws in each test except for the cast iron. I hang the weight and avoid "using myself" in order to remove as many variables as possible and let the saws do the work themselves.. no matter how hard I may try, I can't guarantee that I would apply the same pressure or work the saws the same from one to the next, so I use the 10 pound weight instead to keep it as consistent as possible. I am always open to ideas though, if you've got something in mind that would make it a more even test I'm glad to give it a shot
@@SomeGuywithTools I totally understand what u mean about putting pressure and there is a meaning in that and I agree BUT u have to make sure that u have totally straight the saws and not wheeling or curving down .and also not all the saws have the same weight in front (not the 10pounds).some saws may have more weight in front plus 10pounds it makes alot different in cutting speed in the end ;) anyway it’s complicated what i mean .BUT I LIKE UR CHANNEL ,u are an awesome tool review man ;)
These performance tests don’t account for the build quality in these tools. Materials/Components/ engineering methods/ production costs / place of manufacture all come together to make a top of the line tool. As a construction worker I would buy longevity over marginal performance gain any day.
@@ericunited6925 not trying to sound like a d1ck or anything, but you kind of answered your own thought… these videos are strictly performance tests… I’d be glad to video a deeper dive into their build quality and longevity of the tools, but I didn’t think people would be interested in a longer video like that
@@ericunited6925 As someone who owns a shit ton of milwaukee, I can say that the super sawzall will likely break within a year of hard demolition.... I own 2 both broke every year, and not just one failure multiple. Batteries falling out constantly, speed dials failing in the slowest setting, the lock for the blade broke... To be honest they are rediculiously powerful, but like most things the more power you push the more likely these tools will fail... I burnt the shaft on both of the sawzalls as well, and they started smoking. My 2 cents I rather have the more robust tool that keeps on ticking then the tool I have to service once a year and then replace when it gets out of warranty.... Also fuck milwaukee, you don't need to replace the entire electronic assembly to fix a bad switch on a circular saw.... At least in the 2nd gen they made some durablility improvements. Mainly why you see metal in the battery compartment and a beefier blade clamp, I owned the 1st gen as well and that one broke the blade clamp.... that one was my fault though, I use to eject my blades by pressing the trigger and holding the clamp so I can't knock milwaukee for that.
Milka рулит!!!
I'll stop considering this a vs test now that I've noticed your using the used blades
If you want to then ok 🤷♂️ but buying a whole line up of brand new blades each time I do some testing is out of my price range… these blades have all been used on the exact same number of cuts so I still consider it a fair test. (I bought them new for my previous video of testing and made exactly the same cuts, then put them in a drawer together and didn’t touch them until this round of testing… also, each saw only ran the tests once and then the videos were edited together to show which two I wanted to compare so it wasn’t like each saw made 8 cuts on each blade) Plus in real world applications no one is running out and buying a new blade for each job.
complete crap presentation hilti is powerfull hilti 36v
you are crazy be more realistic hilti is better you use used blades
All the hilti fanboys crying right now.
Are they, though? It seems like the Milwaukee breaks down after a year or two of hard use and needs to be warrantied whereas the Hilti just keeps on trucking
@@schm147b As far as durability they are on par. Depends on the workers, Hilti tends to be on jobsites with more "qualified" users.
@@drewsfjord I've got the 2nd generation Hilti sawzall with the original batteries. 9 years later. I'm still using it. No way you will see the Milwaukee kicking 9 years in the future with the original batteries in a professional tradesmen environment