A response from Shaykh ʿArafāt to the lies of Muzammil Faqīrī against him
Vložit
- čas přidán 18. 12. 2023
- Translated by Abū Ḥamzah Sulaymān (and checked by me). See: abuhamzah.net/reply-from-sh-a...
Beware who you take your knowledge from, because this knowledge is religion. Some trustworthy websites upon the way of the Salaf:
www.salafisounds.com
www.abukhadeejah.com
www.abuiyaad.com
www.learnaboutislam.co.uk
www.salafipublications.com
www.islaam.ca
www.dusunnah.com
www.salaficentre.com
www.troid.ca
www.bakkah.net
www.sunnahpublishing.net
www.tasfiyah.com
Some trustworthy CZcams channels:
/ @dusdawah
/ @daarussunnah
/ @salafirecordings
/ @mpubstv
/ @manhajulhaqq
/ @gtownmasjid
/ channel
/ @markazbukhari
/ @markazmuaadh
abuhamzah.net/reply-from-sh-arafaat-al-muhammadee-regarding-the-lies-of-muzammil-faqeeri-against-him/
@notasweersalafi344 jazaak Allaahu khayran I'll contact them إن شاء الله
حفظكم الله تعالى
May Allah preserve the scholars and the Mashaykh of Ahlus Sunnah.
Aameen
May الله preserve you and Sulaymaan Abu Hamzah
Ameen and you.
@@Yasin_ibn_jamal آمين
Akhi is there a difference between a kufiyyah or shemagh, that which Arabs wear, and a hijaab? Cuz they both cover their head and sometimes a shemagh covers the face
Allaahu a'lam akhi @@AbuNooh2
@@Yasin_ibn_jamal ok بارك الله فيك
Aameen wa iyyaak
May Allah preserve and strengthen the people of Sunnah.
May Allah protect us from shaitan.
May Allah rectify this issue!
Aameen
What about hajoori?
dusunnah.com/video/the-deviations-of-yahya-al-hajuri-and-the-ruling-on-those-who-follow-him-shaykh-abdullah-bin-abdur-rahim-al-bukhari/
www.salafisounds.com/short-clip-the-bidah-of-yahya-al-hajoori-by-abu-khadeejah/
www.alhajuri.com/
Wow this is sad…I’m a huge fan of muzzamil faqeeri his debates with the Sufis and communists and liberals in Sudan are epic if you go this Arabic CZcams channel called salafi manhaj in Sudan u can watch these debates…idk who this sheikh is but wow he seems very much upright..and even accepted the mubahala…mubahalas should never be used only out of extreme necessity…especially not with other Muslims…very sad to see two salafis doing this SubhanaaAllah
Assalaamu 'alaykum. I used to watch and enjoy his debates too before I learnt about all of this, and of course those he debated with proofs (sufis, christians, etc.) were upon clear misguidance and anyone can refute them easily with some knowledge and sound reason. That does not mean that Muzammil is truthful in this fitnah.
He had other issues before which were refuted by other tullaab of Shaykh Rabee' and others before the Fitnah including Sh Nizaar from Sudan, and he got advised by the likes of Sh. 'Abdullaah al Bukhaaree and Sh. Rabee' himself and Sh. 'Arafaat (who speaks in this video). I added some other refutations against him in my article which you can find in the description of this video and I also explained in it the context of what really happened. Muzammil is still silent about the Mubaahalah and we are 5 years later (this audio was recorded in 2018).
As for the speaker, he is Shaykh 'Arafaat al Muhammadee, who is a known student of Sh. Rabee' and Sh. 'Ubayd and he has been praised by the major scholars. He is one of the main ones targetted by Muhammad bin Haadee in this fitnah.
And Muzammil sadly took the side of Muhammad bin Haadee who accused a Salafi of fornic-tion in 2017-2018 and insulted more than 60 scholars and students of knowledge who were known to be Salafis. Based on that, Sh. Rabee' and Sh. 'Ubayd and Sh. 'Abdullaah al Bukhaaree and Sh. 'Abdullaah adh-Dhafeeree and Sh. Khaalid adh Dhafeere and Sh. al Fawzaan (who told the Tullaab to act as if Muhammad bin Haadee did NOT exist) and other scholars (including a report from Sh. 'Abdul Muhsin al 'Abbaad that needs to be checked) refuted Muhammad bin Haadee specifically, yet he has not repented and Muzammil is from his staunch supporters in Sudan.
As for this particular video, then this shows that Muzammil lied against Sh. 'Arafaat and slandered him. Muhammad bin Haadee said (in his lecture) that he only presented 2 evidences against Sh. 'Arafaat to Shaykh Rabee', and this lie from Muzammil was one of two ONLY pieces of "evidence". This really shows that he had no proof against the scholars of the Sunnah and was just searching for any lie to support his claim, so he used Muzammil.... And of course Shaykh Rabee' rejected these 2 evidences.
Is that not funny? This lie from Muzammil tries to portray Sh 'Arafaat as if he was plotting and lying against Sh Rabee' and Sh Nizaar, yet Shaykh Rabee' rejected that "evidence" and Shaykh Nizaar supported Shaykh 'Arafaat and refuted Muzammil and MBH. And Muzammil is still quiet about the Mubaahalah.
wAllaahi I used to love Muzammil before I learnt all of that and I also used to watch videos from NasiralHanbali before I learnt about him and who he supports and who he speaks against... but the Salafis love the truth more than personalities.
BaarakAllaahu feekum
@@AbuHamzahSL Really sad to hear.
Regardless, I would take Sheikh Rabee' حفظه الله and Sheikh Ubayd رحمه الله's stance over these da'ees any day. They are senior scholars in refuting and criticizing deviance and misguidance.
And tbh, what Muhammad Bin Hadi did, I have not heard ANY credible "scholar" do.
I can't expect that kind of hostility and language from Sheikh Ibn Uthaymeen رحمه الله, or Sheikh Ibn Baz رحمه الله or any of the known scholars.
Muhammad Ibn Hadi clearly overstepped the mark and Sheikh Rabee' advised him many times, but he refused to listen and caused this fitnah.
I can't believe people still defend him.
May Allah سبحانه وتعالى guide us all. Ameen.
@@HATL201 Aameen. BaarakAllaahu feek.
@@taimurahmad (You said he is a good shaykh and then you deleted your comment).
Why is he a good Shaykh? I don't think a good Shaykh would use the language he used against Salafi Tullaab and scholars... I don't think a good Shaykh would oppose his elders among the scholars (Sh Rabee' & Sh 'Ubayd) when they advised him, and then say what he said against Sh. Rabee' and Sh. 'Ubayd and the disrespect he showed to them.
I don't think a good Shaykh would do Qadhf without 4 witnesses... which makes him according to the Book of Allaah: a liar whose testimony is NOT accepted. Whether you like it or not, that is his ruling according to the Book of Allaah.
The Book of Allaah is with us and against MBH and his supporters, the first judgement of the Court (which went in line with the evidence) was with us and against MBH and his supporters, the statements of the major scholars is with us and against MBH and his supporters, the evidences are with us and against MBH and his supporters. So how is he a good Shaykh?
That is not a good Shaykh akhi, that is haddaadiyyah.
@@AbuHamzahSL Walaykumusalam SubhanaaAllah I don’t want nothing to do with this as I don’t know any of this nor do I want to know any of this lol I just like shuyookh and daees who spread the sunnah and destroy the falsehood by Allahs permission, May Allah bless everyone and protect the salafies all over from such fitan. HayakAllah
I can't reply to your comment so I'll put it here: Wasn't Shaykh Muhammad Bin Hadi recently cleared of all accusations and also further investigations by the court? Doesn't that mean SPUBS wrongly dropped and insulted many, many salafi scholars? Doesn't that mean the shuyukh must retract their statements regarding him? Some even said claiming neutrality on the issue makes you a shaytaan which is basically takfir, but didn't Shaykh Fawzan say stay neutral?
I wonder if you have a genuine answer for all of these...
Perhaps this contains an answer for you: czcams.com/video/axp5fpsSzHI/video.htmlsi=Kbjt5MvAsZJ10YPi
Even though this audio of Shaykh az-zintani was recorded before MBH was acquitted, his words still apply now. May Allaah give you succes.
Also see this video: czcams.com/video/wYYGqwYSpp0/video.htmlsi=Hz9hFtKaWoouC1fL
This will show you that the issue with MBH is much more than only the issue of Qadhf. والله المستعان
Claiming someone is a shaytaan is not takfeer btw
The issue is more detailed than this. There was tabdi made of over 70 individuals and no proof. 5 years later and no proof of those MBH made tabdi of and no retraction, no clarification. Just fitan.
BaarakhAllaahu feekum
What does that change? He still did Qadhf and the court judged him to be guilty and then he did an appeal against the law of Allaah. But those who defend him don't speak about this. He refused the judgement of the court when they were right and the Musa'afiqah expect us to blindfollow when they judge him to be innocent while Shaykh Rabee' and other scholars judged him to be a Qaadhif and the evidences were with them? How do the Musa'afiqah judge? That is a wrong principle from the Musa'afiqah..
Also the video Yaaseen sent is a sufficient answer in shaa' Allaah, the Shaykh clearly mentions that the Qadhf was not even the main issue. Even if he hadn't done Qadhf, that would not change anything about his condition.
@@AbuHamzahSL Firstly, I was asking with an intention to seek clarification so what do you mean "wrong principles"? I don't know much about the issue but I also know that the majority of laymen from spubs followers are just as ignorant as myself in this since no one has been able to clarify it before, and الحمد لله I don't need to blind follow shaykh Rabi when many other scholars have defended Shaykh Muhammad, but I will watch the videos إن شاء الله to gain perspective.