Physicists Proved The Entire Universe Is Inside A Black Hole?
Vložit
- čas přidán 14. 06. 2024
- In the movie Interstellar, the main character, Cooper, escapes from a black hole in time to see his daughter “Murph” in her final days. Some have argued that the movie is so scientific that it should be taught in schools. In reality, many scientists believe that anything sent into a black hole would probably be destroyed. But a new study suggests that this might not be the case after all.
From a young age I read about discoveries of black holes. At the time my limited understanding was anything even light entering into the hole was lost for ever and that was it!
As I grew older in my mind I hypothesised black holes were gateways or doors to other universe's, all linked together. Once in the hole, the speed of light travelling transcended into something far greater, almost in a blink of an eye to reach another reality beyond my comprehension.
As discussed here, the cosmic background radiation could actually be an event horizon of a black hole, and we're actually inside it apart of another super sized structure thats continually replicating over and over.
Now back to every day thinking! Loved the video though... 👌
same i think this too its just doors to in or out of our observable universe
I'm ready to move on to the next place in life. Get me away from Earth
This is the only life in which you are you. Maybe just visit another region? If you can't afford it, try becoming a backpacker. Much better than ending your story early.
😢Help
Peace to you brother,find God,reply if you need help
@@user-oi4vn7ux7uwhat's going on?
Earth is a penal colony.
It’s important to note that this is still a theoretical concept and not a proven fact. The idea is still being debated among physicists and cosmologists. The idea was started by an article by National Geographic. Physicists discuss that our universe owes its origin to a monster black hole, wherein we reside today. The article explains that the seed of our universe is thought to have been almost unimaginably tiny, possibly trillions of times smaller than any particle humans have been able to observe. And yet it’s a particle that can spark the production of every other particle, not to mention every galaxy, solar system, planet, and person. This seed is theorized to have been forged in the ultimate kiln, likely the most extreme environment in all of nature: inside a black hole.
It's also important to note that the big bang theory is still a theory with few supporting evidence. It's good to keep an open mind about it, but physicists who spent their lives on the theory would dogmatically defend it while berating all other theories.
Its also important to note this channel is autogenerated AI clickbait trash.
There is a prayer that asks “Save us from the darkness we beseech thee oh Lord” Very apt here.
@@JohnnytNaturalbecause of entropy
They’ve never proven gravity lol BUT it’s a fact… silly sheeple
It makes sense for a black hole to be the big bang. From simulations ive seen, Ive concluded that once you cross the event horizon, your view of the past spacetime you once came from will close to a singular point(what looks like the big bang) so in other words, we are in a black hole, also why we can only see back so far, 13.8B yrs ago is when we entered the black hole and you cant see beyond the horizon
Great theoretical IDEOLOGICAL conclusion that I see as ABSOLUTELY PROBABLE
Interesting
If we entered a black hole 13 years ago how did we not notice?
Our bodies and everything thing on earth would have been stretched out like. String of spaghetti
@@Mr_E_Nigma when tf did I say 13 years ago
I’ve thought very similar but your ending does make sense. Anything is possible.
Wouldn’t this imply that we live in an open loop universe where energy can be added? I’m pretty sure the current understanding is that we live in a closed loop system; what’s currently in the universe is all there will ever be.
No
@@oggyoggy1299well yes, if we lived in a black hole, energy is being added from outside, all the time.
There is two curved dents in the universe. Could be from colliding with other universes. Meanwhile back on earth.
Telescopes seen faster than lite moment at end of universe. Maybe like falling off a cliff. Or past the event horizon.
Yes massive amounts of energy are still entering this universe so its open loop.
"Proved" is quite a strong word that a professional science channel wouldn't throw around lightly. Are we doomed? Only the fish who go for the bait...
In the end I still gave this channel a view and a comment. I need to stop doing that.
I thought that the idea is the singularity caused in a black hole inches through to alternate realities and creates a big bang on the other side. So technically you cant move from one universe to another through a black hole you’d be stretched in to spaghetti as they do in sci fi movies but the singularity can create life at the other end of the alternate realities.
Yes that's correct.
That should be punches not inches in the above.
A discussion about The Seed is most likely best shared on a Friday night with beers and martinis all around! 🍻🍺
Awesome video!
Is the universe eternal or not? I suppose it makes little difference to my life. But if the universe is eternal, then I feel as though I might somehow have another chance at life one day.
Do you consider death after life a part of life?If so you have your answer.
Makes no difference in my life either still want to know though
You have another chance at life everyday but a "do over" in its entirety is highly unlikely.
Physisits Brian Green said it will all burn out at some point and the entire universe will go dark, cold and lifeless. This will be billions of years from now.
Eternity is eternal.
So what’s the difference between a universe within a black hole and the black hole in a universe as we observe them today?
Do they mean we started from a black hole ? We certainly can not be in one now after the singularity expanded into the universe . Maybe a white hole
We could be in a black hole, or the formation of said, black hole caused a new iteration of space time on the other side. Functionally, it doesn’t matter. Either way, it explains a lot why there’s a limit to the observable universe and the expansion of universe from the event Horizon of what would’ve been that black hole on the inside
Is it weird that I got brain chills when trying to comprehend the comparison of the inside and outside of a black hole to looking out a window and seeing the room you're in? I mean that would be some really crazy stuff to be able to see in person.
this a great video and presentation
It sounds like when outside a black hole you can observe it's size and therefore measure distance. But as soon as you pass the horizon you are immediately condensed into the center point.
Black holes are based on a mathematical misconception. Most people don't know that Einstein said that singularities are not possible. In the 1939 journal "Annals of Mathematics" he wrote "The essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the Schwarzchild singularities (Schwarzchild was the first to raise the issue of General Relativity predicting singularities) do not exist in physical reality. Although the theory given here treats only clusters (star clusters) whose particles move along circular paths it does seem to be subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The Schwarzchild singularities do not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light."
He was referring to the phenomenon of dilation (sometimes called gamma or y) mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. It's the phenomenon behind the phrase "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". Even mass that exists at 75% light speed is partially dilated. "Time dilation" is just one aspect of dilation.
General Relativity does not predict singularities when you factor in dilation. Einstein is known to have repeatedly spoken about this. Nobody believed in black holes when he was alive for this reason.
Dilation will occur wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass because high mass means high momentum. There is no place in the universe where mass is more concentrated than at the center of a galaxy.
It can be shown mathematically that the mass at the center of our own galaxy must be dilated. In other words that mass is all around us. This is the explanation for the abnormally high rotation rates of stars in spiral galaxies (the reason for the theory of dark matter) the "missing mass" is dilated mass.
According to Einstein's math, there would be no dilation in galaxies with very, very low mass because they do not have enough mass in their centers to achieve relativistic velocities. It has recently been confirmed in 5 very, very low mass galaxies to show no signs of dark matter.
The shape of a galaxy is common in nature. From atoms to our solar system the overwhelming majority of the mass is in the center. The same must be true for galaxies. Where there is an astronomical quantity of mass there is an astronomical quantity of energy. The night sky should be lit up from the galactic center but it isn't.
The modern explanation for this is because gravitational forces are so strong there that not even light can escape. Einstein's answer would be because the mass there is dilated relative to an Earthbound observer.
Black holes were popularized by television and movies in the 1960's and belief in them gradually came to be despite the fact that Einstein said they cannot exist and there was no evidence.
What we see in modern astronomy is evidence of dilation, a known fundamental property of the universe.
Space-time is an oxymoron. When you use an oxymoron in your observation, you have contradicted yourself. What you are quoting is pseudoscience. Space is science fiction. Space is human imagination. Time is the fabric of the universe. When humans observe the galaxy, they are observing light traveling through time. Time, light, and sound work simultaneously as nature. Time is nature. Think about it. Take your time. We experience time through our star the sun. Oxygen is the fuel for consciousness. Don’t test nature by holding your breath. Breathe! Science is humans observing nature. Make your own observations and use your own semantics. Stop quoting pseudo scientist. Einstein was correct when he said energy equals mass times the speed of light squared, no space. Time is the cause and reason for energy. Read more nonfiction, and then comment. Put away the pseudoscience and study linguistics. Put away the pseudoscience and study phonetics. For example, we are our star. KNOW time KNOW stars.
A more likely explanation is simply that what we call our "universe" (that which came out of the big bang) is a function of the interaction of other pre-existing universes like our own, in the same way that our Milky Way galaxy is a function of the interaction of other pre-existing galaxies. And, in the same way that our galaxy is affected and held together by the gravity imparted by the other large galaxies that our galaxy exists in relation to, our universe would likewise be existing in relation to it's "parental" universes together with an endless night sky of others which would be exerting a massive amount of gravity. No need for dark matter to explain things.
With the new discovery’s of the James web telescope the Big Bang theory is pretty much demantled. The galaxy’s they just discovered proved that’s there’s no way the Big Bang could of happened. I wonder what the next theory will be.
They divorced galaxy’s older than the age of the Big Bang theory an bigger than the galaxy’s closer to us. If your wondering
Yes, apparently there is material out there older than the big bang. This hypothesis explains that. Our universe (what came out of the big bang) is a function of that pre-existing material, and exists in relation to it. That would explain the mysterious gravity that holds our universe together.@@Spiff22364
No!!! The big band theory has been proven wrong…….. to my understanding
This shit really click and bait
GREAT video
"....let's find out, shall we. " Sure dude.
I was born with many difficulties in my life. Although I am not fully educated, I have a strong love for science and the universe. Thank you for bringing it to me. Love you
Is still an hypothesis that many disagree with
Great ... just great. Now I'm broke AND I might be living in a black hole. It just never ends.
Yes maybe black holes are new universes and dark matter and vacuum is dark energy and it's about zillion universes like atoms and maybe we live in one black hole in our universe is one big empty space and it's our hole it's 2d and inside is 3d universes and it's 4d
If the "Big Bang" was a double bang - a massive positive time/positive matter singularity coming into existence at the same instant that a negatively massive negative time/negative matter singularity came into existence, and if what we perceive as "NOW" has polarity, so as our positive matter/positive time universe expands into a positive time (a positive "NOW"), then the other universe anti-expands into a negative time (a negative "NOW"). Ultimately the two halves of the dual universe bounce back together. And bang again.
I’ve always thought this but I don’t think we are in trouble I think our perception of reality was created under the intense environment of the black hole itself
It makes sense that we live inside a humongous black hole, because it's been proved that our 'universe' has been expanding faster than the speed of light. So in conclusion, our black hole (universe) is growing and growing as long as it's being fed from the outside.
The gigantic being dropped a tab, that's why its pupil (the black hole) is expanding.
No, actually its expanding very slowly, kilometers per parsec, its just every part of it is expanding and all those kilometers of expansion in billions of parsecs add up over great distance, add up to a speed in excess of light, but individual things are moving very slowly, its comparing the relative speed of things billions of light-years apart.
The problem with gravity at that extreme level is that it requires the proportionate density to create the gravity, so you'd essentially have to rewrite the laws of physics as we know them for the possibility of living inside of a black hole in which matter isn't compressed together to exist.
All we need to know is what to do against spaghetification.
Just imagine an scenario in which you can survive staying inside of a black hole what you could see outside surrounding of the black hole is a completely surrounded white landscape because light is absorbed by the black hole from all directions to the black hole so the landscape 360 degrees XYZ.
The cosmic microwave background, its just redshifted so much because we are falling so fast away from it.
We cant see what we are falling to because light or any signal can't move outward.
In 4d, the direction tawrd center only allows movement in one direction, no signal can go in the direction of out. You can slow your fall moving by moving in any other direction possible (up down right left forward back in 3 of the 4 dimensions) That is just how black holes work.
You know what in our daily normal experience that behaves exactly like that? Huge evedence that we are in a black hole , a fact that everyone experiences!
It's TIME!
You can only go one way and can't see what is ahead. Its time!
As we are falling forward in time we are getting spaghettified,
Things are getting spread out in time, we just perceive it as distance because it takes longer to get places further away. Thats the expansion of the universe. We sre accelerating, like the observed expansion.
What about the mass of things that fell in ahead of us, its gravity that pulls , thats dark matter, we will never see it because we will never catch up to it its always in a future we can't catch up to.
The infinity of the singularity is the infinite future. Almost like Gabriel's horn, we can never reach the mouthpiece, its an infinity, but the volume is finite, the universe is only so big.
How many other parts of ordinary life and astronomical observations are actually consistent with the idea of being within a black hole that most astrophysics do not recognize because they are imagining it from the outside looking in , not as if they actually evolved inside the environment associating the properties of such a spacetime to their normal experience.
I got serious questions. I like when you have a theory and share online that makes it to MIT and Harvard. 😮
Why could not there be many seeds instead of one seed in the „ void“ leading to Multiverses. This could be the explanation why the James Webb telescope discovered „ ripe Galaxies“ in the dark period of our big bang, in which an older big bang not far ours caused its ripe galaxies to intrude into our big bang system .❤
So any 3-D object reaching the surface of a black hole would be stretched like a string, then deposited as two dimensional object?
From the frame of reference outside of the black box..
From the frame of what's falling in, ya wouldn't even notice!
What I think is crazy is that if the universe is expanding in all directions, and there's nothing stopping it from getting bigger, then that would imply that our entire universe which is mind bogglingly big, is in a empty space that's even bigger, otherwise how is it able to expand? Think about it, if it's able to get bigger then it must be in a even larger space that can accommodate the growth right?
Im so proud of how far we've come as humanity , im glad the scientists were in the black hole and came back safely together with Tom Cruise
Would that they could stay there
I have been saying this for years there are over 40 quintillion black holes in the universe there are way to many black holes for them not to have a purpose other then destroy the universe and not to mention the star that was returned to its orgainal form after the black hole stopped feeding on it which means if you survived to the other side you will be back to normal possibly which means black holes are faster than the speed of light
We are in the age of Science woowoo. It went from "matter and energy" can't be destroyed (without defining those) to "information". What information? Define information. Why would a "universe seed" need a "protective" shell? Protection from what if nothing exists?
The fact that this sort of click bait is allowed on CZcams serves only as immeasurable evidence of how far humanity has fallen as a species.
I've been saying this forever. It's the only theory that accounts for all the anomalies other models can't explaim
To me this is the same as when they tried to argue that 1 + 1 doesn't equal 2.
It’s not „Schwarz-Child“. It’s spoken „shwartsshild“ radius. „Schild“ is German for „shield“
Theories are expressed as fact in schools. Later, when more information is available, the theory is discarded for a new one. Then the cycle continues. Nobody knows.
If 'now' moved there would be no entropy. The Second Law of Thermodynamics describes this in a second-hand way.
Information is like life can't be destroyed only transform
wait , if there is nothing , then a seed explodes into the big bang universe , where did this seed come from , and where is it when it bangs , if there is nothing then there is nowhere for this to happen ? start again ?
My lighters fall in backholes all the time.
That explains why my lighters vanish, 😅👍
R to 0. There really is no zero because if you cut 1 in half infinitely it will never reach "0" but that thought may only work in a 2 dimensional environment. In our 3rd dimension environment, if you are running towards the finish line, you eventually cross the line.
And here I was thinking it was only our PM with a black hole between his ears...
The first guy to suggest this type of thing was Nassim Haramein. They all dismissed him and his theories. Now look at him!!
If we were inside of a black hole we’d all be crushed by gravity into the center.
answer is no why because if u ar read in Bible nothing star and nothing form whether black all it's mean proof we ar live in black hole
Surely upon entering a black hole the rotational force would instantly cause a black out as the human body is unable to stand a large G Force and the mass the body would take on would be severe to say the least
You'd be dead if you entered a black hole. It doesn't take a genius to know that. Black holes rip apart planets and stars.
Black holes tear atoms to pieces, so unless you are a single electron, once the horizon is crossed, no more squishy, spongee organism, and the very concepts of alive/dead, occurence, location, distance...all go Bye
Bye...■ □ ¤ ▪︎ • •
The seed need water to grow and dirt around itt getting the type of seed is the hard part? The matter?
How can I get out of this fucking Universe/Black Hole beyond the event horizon? At superluminal speed?
Wouldn't it be wild if advanced civilizations create black holes to live in.
The Most crazy fact is That the Center of the Miky way is a Black hole
If we lived in an unbelievably huge clock will we ever discover that we live in a universe that was constructed to tell time and our living there is insignificant? The more so in this real universe.
I theorised that our universe is an oasis of mostly massless space in a continuum that is an infinite "black hole" expansion. In other words the infinity of space is not mostly empty, it's mostly full of mass. This explains the accelerating expansion of the universe, rushing on all sides because of gravity causing mass to rejoin the "black hole" mass. Nothing in existence is perfect therefore even in this "black hole" mass there are events that cause these oasis
This theory is based on other logic, which I quote: A=A, A=/=B, A V B, A => B therefore The Big Bang is not an effect without a cause, therefore there was mass before, therefore there's no physical law (that I know of) that what was and what is can't coexist. Also space (and time) don't physically exist and therefore can't expand, nor have they any effect on mass. Gravity affects things that have mass (including light which is made a liquid in a certain condition; big lol). Space and time are meaningless in the absence of mass. The accelerating expansion of the universe is another phenomena at work, merely represented by the purely human concepts of space and time. Oh, and there's no such thing in reality as 3d or 4d, it's yet another human delusion, like seeing colors, or money
I've thought this for years.
all the information inside the black hole is reduced to flat space then the black hole expands faster than the speed of light it never evaporates... maybe
A seed was formed, inside another seed. The goalpost of creation was just moved to a “parent universe”. What was the parent of the parent?
So much story telling.
A black hole pulls everything in a white hole would in theory do the opposite push everything away the universe is constantly expanding so we must be in a white hole we just don’t know it we’re yet to find one because we’re in it
My brain ain't working anymore 😭
Right, lol. Me too
I have offered the same theory of the big bang emanated from a black hole which would be the biggest mother that had devoured not just every blackhole but in doing so devoured our whole universe thereby creating a new universe .The fact that these black holes are far from us in terms of light years and as such I would believe be impossible to test practically the theory of what happens when one enters the hostile event horizon and on into the Blackhole 16:28
Almost like a Zen paradox isn't it, how can the Universe have always existed, but then again how could a Universe come from nothing?? Either way makes my brain hurt!!! 🤔
God made the universe
@@GTSN38god is the universe, god is a black hole.
Nothing is something and one thing by itself is meaningless without interaction, so now you have something but you still have nothing so now you have two things, but the group of 2 things is a thing so now you have 3 things. As more and more things happened an exponential growth of combinations and complexity exploded.
So if you could go beyond the edge of our universe (which is just another black hole) you would appear in another universe (or same maybe?) with many other galaxies and black holes/universes. Maybe there is even an afterlife after all. In another black hole/universe. Maybe the answer would be too shocking for one to handle.
In my oppinion, if we could magically travel faster than the speed of our expanding universe (which is faster than the speed of light), we would theoretically be able to exit the borders of this potential black hole we are living in. Now the question is would we be in the center of another universe's galaxy? Really mind boogling to think about.
We couldn't get pass the hydrosphere a wall a fire that's at the edge of space,from beyond behind it lies nothing but darkness, you won't be able to cross over
Physics cannot be proved another world's existence practically
ive always thought this even as a kid i would hvae nightmares about being syrrounded by a 3d grid of blackholes all around me like i was inside the array of blackholes and since then whneevr i would think baout pyhsics and the making of out universe i alway shad a intuitive thought in the back of my head that what if were in side a blackholes in auniverse with more and all that branching out to universeinisde and out of our blackhole
I like your videos and this was a nice thought provoking subject, but i could not find any proof in its contents that we are in a black hole or if we were in any danger?
Just kidding, i wasnt expecting one. But the titles are a bit click baitie if you know what i mean 😊
just because something is similar does not make it the same thing.
So, our universe, which is the result of the “big bang”, is actually inside a giant black hole (primordial singularity?) that hasn’t “banged” yet? That will be hard to reconcile with brane theory.
We are inside the black hole and the one we see is the exit to the reality.
The inside from Schwartzchild to zero is the same as the outside, from Schwartzchild to Infinity.
So the Universe is shaped like a Klein Bottle ?
Physicist has proved nothing but their own mode of observation
You should have researched the Big Bang before making this video. New studies show it likely didnt happen and the universe is twice as old as we originally thought.
Ohhh where did you watch that video ? Please tell me what study suggest it? Please whats the title of the research. Only thing suggested is that according to JSTW galaxies were way more massive very early on and the current model has to be updated as everything in science when we are getting new data. And this is all about it. CMBR can and will always prove the BB theory.
I don't want to be a smartass I guess you like universe stuff and this is great it is the youtubers making their thumbnails and video names as amazing as it gets and with editing skills make high quality video but mostly just claiming outlandish stuff and not actuall studies. As I write no paper was published even talking about what you claimed. Have a good day
@@gasperstarina9837 i saw 1 article a week or 3 ago, but ive never seen anything more on the subject. I think it was fake, or just a bad article.
😳... Oh, I thought it was just my Life. Good to know. I knew it was a little dark in here.👍
This is an old theory I've always liked. But if black holes dissolve and then disappear in death and the universe is expanding, does it just seem like it's expanding from the inside of the black hole? Because if black holes dissolve in death, wouldn't that make them smaller? I have no idea I'm no physicist/scientist.
What if every universe is inside a black hole?
I think that the only chance at life is in the here and now. I live in Polynesia and we believe that pour lives live on with our descendants. So making a good job of being a parent and grandparent is essential to survival. Long term- that is...
Vegita: Big bang attack!
If that's the case then why is everything drifting away?
Coz the black hole where we live eats more galaxies,stars & planets that make the hole stronger, bigger and wider spreading faster than the speed of light for billions years.
Great post.. We are not living inside a black hole .
Cameraman is a beast🤷
The day I first learned of the "big bang" when I was about 12, my immediate reaction was, OK, what was before the big bang? Even then, I realized that infinity goes as far backward as forward. I was dumbstruck to hear supposed genius-level scientists talking about the big bang being the beginning of everything, including time. It was clear to me that these scientists were genius-dumb, not genius-smart. This was sixty years ago and only within the last 5-10 years are we hearing of hypotheses about what came before. I certainly am not a genius but this is just one more example that "experts" frequently get it wrong and are so caught up in their own theories that they miss fundamental principles. Never let yourself be bullied by stupid people, by delusional people, nor by arrogant people, irrespective of their supposed credentials.
Yeah and I can't believe everything was created out of nothing. I believe in God because there's no better explanation for reality and life.
@@GTSN38 The Big Bang and God spoke the stars into existence does go hand in hand (as I recall). However, it is implied in the bible that Earth was already here. Perhaps a rogue planet? If so where did it come from and did life exist in that system once. Too many questions not enough answers.
@cdmarshall7448 yeah, we'll know everything when we're dead I'm guessing.
@@cdmarshall7448In the Genesis account, 'earth' is not to be understood as a planet, it was to be understood as 'matter' and also it is a reference to the above/below paradigm. Heaven is the spacious upper realm that surrounds, and Earth is the lower opposite; course, dense and heavy. In other words, the seed or core of our universe that is described here was initially void and formless and shrouded in darkness until something triggered a sudden burst of light and energy and THEN the expanse of space was made possible which cooled and separated carbons from electromagnetic energy, this allowed galaxies to settle and solar systems to fjnd temporary stability and finally spawn planets with photosynthesis...fruitfullness and multiplicity...
Pondering that question which we all had, by the way when first hearing about the big bang is a far cry from being able to formulate a sound theory regarding a prior state or 'other side' of a singularity. A quantum or cosmological 'Theory' must present a model which does not come face to face with any awkward contradictions with the prevailing model. Like your childhood notions about 'infinity', the very notion of the infinite is even more problematic than the notion of a quantum singularity. There appears to be no such tbing as 'ONE' of anything. We cannot construct any workable model for it. Same with the 'Infinite', infinity can only be grasped in its relation to TIME. So until a UNIFIED and UNIFYING model of the universe appears, ALL is finite and multiplicit, including that mysterious 'prior' 'other' state or thing before tbe big bang..
So, unless you can present a quantum, mathematical model that elucidates your musings that can unify gravity with space/time and entropy with the Higgs /Boson particle, you haven't even reached tbe stage of a sound hypothesis, let alone an actual tbeory. A scientific tbeory is the point at which an idea achieves the status of 'beyond a reasonable doubt', only THEN is it called a 'theory'. Please stop bashing science and fields of study that you know nothing about. If you feel bullied, it is only because you haven't bothered to do the research and seek the answers as others have done.
The found out huh? Great. They have proof? Wow! We were all really worried!!
This is great.
doesn't the milky way look like another form of a "black hole"?
If it is big enough it would make sense
Ok, if a super massive star goes, Supernova explodes and creates a black hole. What matter has been expelled, and what matter has been retained and compressed to a singularity. Everyone talks about matter but does not explain what that matter is. Would be nice to know.
Nothings a matter, it's fine.
And expending universe depends on our interpretations too. But our models fail
Seeing the Matrices and spacetime moving like a clock was enough to make me surrender from this world's blind scientific beliefs.
Makes sense, that's about all the mass we would see and do see
No it don't, if all the mass is evenly distributed forever, ironically everything pulling on everything pull's itself apart, gravity acts repulsive..
But thats only if everything is the same everywhere in a closed curve (Pac-Man loop around) or infinite universe.
If there is a density gradient, and there is an outside to the universe and its less dense or nothing, then yeah, we should definitely be in a black hole.
To me it just makes sense that there would be nothing outside of everything.
Not that we could ever know if it was closed because it would take so long going in a straight line to get back where you started you would never recognize it when you got there! That would be the case if we were in the 3d surface of s 4d sphere.
But personally i don't think we are on the surface. I think we are inside. Inside of the black hole and falling to the center is what we experience as time, thats why we can't go back in time only forward.
Escaping our black hole universe would be functionally equivalent to going faster than light till before the beginning of time. And only outside the universe could we experience time in any direction, could we even live there?
@petevenuti7355
According to the math, the amount of mass that we would see and do see are about the same. It's not fantasy or fiction. It's actually been done. You can read the studies on it too. I was surprised a bit myself
@@gcoffey223 I'm aware of that too, but one of the major arguments against why that wouldn't necessarily mean that we're in a black hole has to do with the mass density and distribution.
If mass was smoothly distributed forever it would be impossible to collapse, and in general the universe IS too smooth. And from what I understand gravity would actually act like a repulsive force in those conditions. The question is does it go on forever, infinite, beyond the observable limits , is it a 4d sphere where we are in the surface, with those two situations there would be no overdensity that would cause the collapse. But there are theories for all other kinds of shapes, many of which can match observations.
Personally though I lean to the idea that we actually are in a black hole, not a 3d surface of a 4d sphere but embedded within.
As evidence I site the nature of time, unidirectional at the speed of light (that hyperbolic curve you get when you relate speed in time relative to speed in space, aka relativity)
I don't think any of the geometries proposed by any other theory specifies or accounts for or accounts for the directionality of time.
@petevenuti7355
I've used to feel that time was like entropy, a one way ticket if you will. But the higher you go in dimensions, to me that means you can go forward and backward. I imagine a being in the 5th dimension coukd move about anywhere on our 4d world. In theory, I guess. It is sn amazing time to be alive in the 5th dimension
Because of too much space gaps this black hole is consuming all of us!
I downvote any video that uses an automated AI narration. I don’t care how good the video is
This Video is LOVED by Physics Students or BOTH Physics and Biology Students from St. Finian's College Mullingar Co. Westmeath Ireland. Aldi McDonalds
I'm doomed already.
I'm calling bullshit on this one..
It’s called “Rahde Krishna” red shift and blue shift , expansion and compression ❤ by curving back onto myself I create again and again “Shree Krishna” this knowledge has been in the holy vedas for thousands of years ❤ matter is the result of the division of the structures of space itself ❤ thank you for this special scientific knowledge of black holes ❤ “ Agnim “ when you say this word feel what happens in your throat , there is a start or an opening , then an abrupt stop or closer , and follows with a continuation in nim 😊 knowledge is way deeper than we ever thought 😊 just saying
I believe I know how to capture dark energy,it requires a vacuum of space atmosphere.
whats on the other side of our universe you don't want to go to.
I'm not saying the title is click bait but now I have started this sentence, I don't know how to finish...
The title is massive clickbait
@@bas_ee The joke is on them though.
CZcams will no longer recommend this channel to me... 🤣
Hi everyone , whats behind all this? Black holes are every where in the universe starting inside galaxies n other ones moving around , smaller of course n the ones in sub atomic particles..dont know endless renewable?? As whats behind all this?