Vaccine mRNA found in breast milk or not (new and older studies). How did we miss that in the past?
Vložit
- čas přidán 6. 09. 2024
- #vaccineRNA #humanmilk #vaccineinmilk
Let's look at multiple studies that investigated the presence of vaccine mRNA in human milk.
If you appreciate my work, you can buy me a coffee. :)
www.buymeacoff...
Video Transcript:
dr2hong.com/we...
Disclaimer:
This video is Dr. Hong’s interpretation and summary of publically available scientific information
This video is not intended to serve as any advice regarding the treatment, prevention, and diagnosis of any diseases
Dr. Hong has no connections and receives no monetary compensation from any pharmaceutical companies and government.
This video is for educational purposes only.
-------------------------------
To learn more:
-------------------------------
Source References:
Codominant IgG and IgA expression with minimal vaccine mRNA in milk of BNT162b2 vaccinees
www.ncbi.nlm.n...
Addressing anti-syncytin antibody levels, and fertility and breastfeeding concerns, following BNT162B2 COVID-19 mRNA vaccination
www.medrxiv.or...
Evaluation of Messenger RNA From COVID-19 BTN162b2 and mRNA-1273 Vaccines in Human Milk
www.ncbi.nlm.n...
Neutralizing Activity and SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine mRNA Persistence in Serum and Breastmilk After BNT162b2 Vaccination in Lactating Women
www.ncbi.nlm.n...
Detection of Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Human Breast Milk
www.ncbi.nlm.n...
Extracellular Vesicles in Human Milk
www.ncbi.nlm.n...
Biological Properties of Milk-Derived Extracellular Vesicles and Their Physiological Functions in Infant
www.frontiersi...
ABM STATEMENT Considerations for COVID-19 Vaccination in Lactation
abm.memberclic...
COVID-19 Vaccines While Pregnant or Breastfeeding
www.cdc.gov/co...
…..and the officials continue to recommend…..are we living in the unbelievable age?
A few short months ago this video for sure would have got you banned.
Very bad news about missing all kinds of dangers... That is WHY we do full trials before approval. Not EUA evil jokes
Even proper trials are shady when they are conducted by the product manufacturer. Pharma has an impressive criminal record.
I worry about the long term (years from now) effects of these "vaccines"... I worry about what has been done to humanity. Thank you Dr. Hong for these videos!
What long term effects?
@@MRCAGR1 exactly, we don’t know yet, only the horrible short term side effects.
@@pablopabloo1794 mRNA cannot be incorporated into the human genome as it lacks the necessary enzymes, transcriptase and integrase. Every time you’re infected with an RNA virus mRNA is produced in the cytoplasm, every time you’re infected with a DNA virus, it enters the nucleus where an mRNA is created and passed into the cytoplasm. From there proteins are created. In normal circumstances every second of every day your cell nuclei are producing mRNA that produces proteins.
@@MRCAGR1 where did @pablo pabloo mention anything about the mRNA being incorporated in the human genome?
What an incredibly ignorant response.. "What long term effects?" No person can possibly ascertain that there are no long-term effects using novel vaccines, with novel technology having novel safety signals. If you recall from Nursing, robust long term data would be required to make any such conclusion.. There are several mechanisms leading to vaccine injuries and/or biodistribution that were once definitively deemed "biologically inplausible." So please, skip the hubris.
What the hell did you expect these Frankenstein shots cross the blood brain barrier.
Oh we didnt know 😂 but cancel all the doctors that told all this bs 2years ago
Although I appreciate Dr. Hong's admittance of being wrong, it sounds too much like indicating he didn't know.
Not only was there a previous study on this issue, but there were hundreds, maybe thousands of reported issues with the female reproductive system, particularly unusual bleeding and returning menstruation. Also, there was the evident myocarditis/pericarditis issue.
All that suggested an "unforeseen" mRNA presence around the body and for much longer than marketed.
This was a clear signal and the risk for women and the stakes for newborns was OBVIOUSLY too high.
You see, Dr. Hong, the wrongdoing wasn't just the "blind-trust" advice, it was the conscious denial towards the previous studies and reports, which, accompanied by the government's coercion, made you and others to negligently avoid giving the medically obligated recommendation:
Pregnant and expected-to-be pregnant women shouldn't have taken those "vaccines", neither any type of booster today.
Like Dr Sherri Tenpenny said the student doctors would not be at fault but others should have known better. To many peoples peril. It is getting worse by the day.
Poison!
The public must take some responsibility for their own actions, despite anxiety being very easily triggered especially as a new mum. I would not even take an aspirin during my pregnancies.
@@alicerose9140 when these mRNA covid products are more widely recognized as the fiasco they knowingly were, I'm sure there's going to be so much to unpack about humanity's behavior with these policies.
@@juliobro1 yes, a huge reckoning although there is still a lot of denial about.
Yes it’s disgraceful
Dear Dr. Hong, as a medical doctor I really appreciate your careful, thoughtful, intellectually honest, meaningful reviews on the topics that you choose to talk about.
Many thanks, and keep on the good work.
Are your medical peers waking up yet?
Hope you, as a medical professional, didn't push this nonsense on your patients....
Thanks Doc! I am glad that other medical professions are also watching my videos. Thanks for the continuous support!
@@MK-ih6wpdumb comment
@@timmytuckerson3450 you obviously aren't educated nor qualified to make comments and your opinions are ignorant. So shush.
When the CDC removed the bit from their website a few months ago that mRNA only stays local in the arm and disappears in less than two days, there would be unknown consequences. The mRNA has been found throughout the body 60 days afterwards.
Yup, and to back you up for those who may want to read it themselves, the relevant paper is titled “Immune imprinting, breadth of variant recognition, and germinal center response in human SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination.”
If I remember correctly, the 60 day cutoff marked the end of the study period. So it could actually be lasting much longer than that.
Bruce Patterson told McCullough the spike was lasting for a year in some of his patients.
Actually, 4 months (before going to publication) via exosomes. Nov 2021 Journal of Clinical Immunology, Cutting Edge section
This was known VERY early on by the information the Japanese requested of where the capsules ended up.
According to the daily sceptic an Oxford study has found a 44%increase in infection in those that got the shot?
True. And confirms anecdotal evidence. Where I live, I know only 3 men and 2 women without the jab. Among my numerous jabbed acquaintances, most have been infected - some twice. None of the few unjabbed 🤷♀️ . I am 69, unmasked unjabbed and have never had C. I know this because blood tests do not lie
That would make sense given more people received the covid vaccines and the vaccines are leaky. This means they were never designed to prevent infection
i don't understand why it would be a new study, why would people assume it wouldn't be in breast milk most things that the mother takes while pregnant are transferred to the child
@@quotejoss who said that ? and we have muscles all over our body, just as our blood flows everywhere... why would spike protein only stay in ones muscle what would be the point of that when combatting respiratory disease....
@@rougemoonchild9429 im sorry but you really need to go back to understand. Yes we were told that the MRNA has specifically been designed to remain in the intramuscular tissue locally at the injection site.
@@rougemoonchild9429 The immune response would work for the whole body even if the vaccine only stays in the arm, it's the same for other vaccines too
@@Underline78 again i do not know who told you that,... maybe they were tryna comfort the masses or, cover their own asses. i couldn't tell you, common sense would dictate anything going in your blood stream, will travel where ever the blood flows, for example what happens when u drop toxic chemicals in a river....it flow everywhere and spreads out wards. and because of my understand of that concept it was enough for me not to take the vaccine in itself
@@trianglesandsquares420 put lotion on one part of your skin and tell me if it flows to each and every other part,... you can make up what u want but it has already been proven the spike protein does not stay in one place.
So the answer is yes and the Brest feeding mother's should not have been taking the vaccine with mRNA and a pregnant mother shouldn't take the vaccine w/mRNA at all and those women who would like to become mother's one day should proceed with caution.
It's easy to miss stuff if you ignore it.
its an upstanding person that stands up and owns their errors cheers to you, Dr.
"The science is changing."
No.... the SCIENTISTS were just WRONG. But most of the world isn't ready for that conversation yet.
This does not affect me personally, but are new mothers being made aware of this by their doctors or through msm media so that they can make a more informed decision?
Nope.
@@nooa69 that's just unbelievable!
No,they are not being informed because they are the test subjects and so are their children.Never forget the mother's volunteer for the exspirment.
My friend's baby just died suddenly out of nowhere. They just celebrated his 1st bday, and now he is gone.
I am so devastated for them. The parents aren't able to talk about what happened yet (understandably). All they said was "the doctors and nurses did everything they could to save him..."
I'm going to lose my sh1t if this is jab-related.
Of course, even if it is, the medical industry is unlikely to ever admit it.
@@MK-ih6wp this makes me so sad 😔
Thank you for caring and share information
I am 56 have not taken vaccine
Have not been unwell
Most off mine friends took it and young too
They all had health problems after so far
That they did not expect out off blue
To have
Its so much unknown what it can do to human natural imunity and long term or short effect
I watch Mr been
And Dr camplel
And more
Just normal pearson l am not a doctor
Just artist therapist and interested in health
Keep good work and information is kind off you
All the best wishes
I feel sorry for people who took it in fear off loosing job
They took risk
Thanks for the thoughtful comment. Take care!
That’s very interesting. Infants are more susceptible to mutations due to continued developmental stages that continue for several years 😢😢😢😢😮😮😮
@aldaley3537 - you're lying.
We are doomed!!
No just those that took the mRNA vaccines.
I'm not.
Thank you for admitting to being wrong initially. That means so much more than just hollow apologies or people saying "everyone just needs to do what is best to protect themselves." I'm getting really tired of the latter...
Nuremberg 2. Hopefully!
Thank-You Dr.Hong for your continued perseverance in sharing your findings. I ask? Have you came across ANY non-vaccinated studies or in essence Natural Immunity? Every single vaccinated person I know of with minimum of two shots and some fully boostered have ALL come down with the Virus? Some others non-Vax'd as well?? This needs to be looked into in order to analyse effectiveness NOT mere Speculation or Political Agenda.
Ok. Look at the P.45 of this uk government report (COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report: 31 March 2022 (week 13)). The more recent reports do not offer that sort of comparison anymore. In this report, it shows the number of people that are infected or died per 100000 (people that has 3 shots or more vs people that has not taken any). The result will surprise you.
I agree that most people I know have three shots also caught the virus, unless they are really careful and limit public interactions. The vaccine is not long lasting is a fact. I think the push or argument now is most appropriate for the very old and people with weakened immune system. They are in real danger. Thanks for asking.
A better question is HOW??? amd if it can get in breast milk, where else can it go.
Good question. But it also depends on the amount. Every thing has a dose dependent effect. Thanks for asking.
But , it's an injection, not a vaccine please clarify this distinction.
injection is a general term for the route of administration, heroine can be an injection, the semantics debate to use a general term with basically no significant meaning that can be applied to any drug given via that route, isn't actually helpful or relevant
Isn’t it a vaccine that’s injected? Im confused.
Fortunately I chose to remain in the control group
At no time in this video is the phrase ‘ breast feeding women ‘ - quite an achievement in political omission
What about in (uhm) male sperm? Can a male transmit to a female?
Yes. It gets in both the testes and ovaries.
I would like to hear the answer to that question,because I refuse to ingage sexually with anyone that say yes they took any of those vaccines even with a condom.
@@roryteal5940 Thank You! I wonder for how long? 🥺
😂
It is hypothetically plausible to workout the bio-distribution of the clotshot. To claim that we don't know this before the mass indiscriminate vaccination is intellectually dishonest. This was carefully planned from the beginning.
The french guy Attali wrote all about it.
The more important implication is that this means that if mRna can be passed on to baby via breast milk, means that mRna can be ingested orally into the human body. And if that can happen, that means mRna can also be ingested orally via other food sources as well. Now think of the implications of that. Even HIV cant be transmitted this way.
@@danielleglorie8164 Attali"s quotes are chilling. Of course the fact checkers claim they were taken out of context, or lost in translation or something.
I have a hard time believing that. I think he meant what he said.
A regulatory specialist once told me biodistribution studies aren't even required for vaccines. Just for drugs.
If true, we are in a world of hurt.
What's this "we" business? I wasn't wrong. Just the "experts" were.
Thanks for asking. Since I am part of the scientific community, this is whom I was referring.
😂😂
I saw your request for vaccine injury stories. I have one, but I think it's more a case of incorrect administration than injury from the vaccine.
At 69, I qualified for 3rd and 4th doses. My first 2 doses were Astra Zeneca, which is approved in Australia. 3rd dose was Pfizer booster dose. All were administered in my left deltoid and I had no reactions to the 2nd or 3rd doses.
I opted for Moderna booster in the right upper arm. This was, based on the location of the band aid spot, administered more to the back of my upper arm.
Subsequently I have had a nagging ache when I raise that arm laterally, and the irritation goes down to the head of radius on my right arm. Many years ago I did a year of anatomy so know where my deltoid and radius are.
I have seen reports of others experiencing a metallic taste after vaccination but I definitely didn't have that.
This has been more a nuisance, not a serious issue. I have considered taking an NSAID, but so far have chosen not to.
Have you ever heard of SIRVA? Shoulder Injury Related To Vaccine Administration. It is not specific to COVID jabs-- can happen after any jab, I believe.
Glad you didn't get the metallic taste. Some believe this is a sign of injecting into blood vessel.
Maybe ask your doctor about a supplement called NAC (N-Acetyl-Cysteine) to help your liver detox from the shots. NAC helped me get over long COVID (brain fog, fatigue), but it also helps people who are jab injured.
NAC reduces risk of clots, which is a concern for all brands of covid jabs.
Aspirin prlly wouldn't be a bad idea, as it also thins the blood to reduce clots, and might relieve the pain in your arm.
Most people I know had the Moderna, and so am I. The Moderna dose do seem to hurt more than the others. It could be their formulation. Thanks for sharing your experience. Take care!
@@DrHongsPharmacyClassroom I hope TAKE CARE means STOP TAKING MORE DOSES.
Great breakdown! Better than Drbeen's breakdown- he speculates that this means the shedding phenomenon is possible? Thoughts Dr Hong?
It is possible. The key question is how much are shedded. Every drug/ vaccine is dose dependent, the amount is key to the effect/ side effect. Thanks for asking.
We know everything in the system of the mother will pass to the child. How could we exclude breast milk ? Come on.....
We’ll learn more as the >
Know that there is much more to come concerning the mRNA vaccines.
Great!
Can you please do a video on novavax and what is known about it now that people have taken it, ty
Shocker. 🙄
My granddaughter takes about 100 ml over a twenty minute period. This is about 1 ml every 20 seconds. This one ml contains a few nanograms of mRNA. After each mouthful it takes around 3 seconds for the milk to enter the stomach via peristalsis. The whole route to the stomach is lined with mucus. Do you think that mRNA can get through that when it is enough to stop viruses and bacteria? Once it gets into the stomach it is exposed to an environment that has a pH of 1-2, very acidic, can it survive that? Once it gets into the GI tract then there is the biome.
Finally, if it manages all of this, then by what mechanism can it get into cells as naked mRNA? mRNA is an intracellular entity.
These are the questions that need answers, not that mRNA is found in breast milk. Note there’s no indication that the spike protein is in the milk. Also, this would suggest that all viruses can be passed in breast milk.
@07:36 under normal circumstances breastmilk EVs with important microRNA for immune development cross/pass all those barriers and enzymes you mentioned, to be eventually absorbed by the infant's intestinal cells.
They tested the blood samples in a few babies and they did not see any mRNA in them. In all cases, no trace of mRNA in breast milk beyond 1 week after vaccination. Thanks for asking.
@@DrHongsPharmacyClassroom do you have a reference for babies being tested?
i told ye so...
John 3.16-21 Mark 1.15
so a baby having a big feed can ingest .6% of a full injected dose if it drinks 100ml. that sounds really high to me. Does RNA that is protected by EV get broken down in the stomach, or does it pass through the walls into the blood? if it does, what is the effect?
@07:36 Dr Hong shortly explains what normally happens with breastmilk EVs that have important microRNA inside of them. It's super interesting, I never knew this.
They tested the few babies' blood in the study. They did not see any mRNA in the blood. Thanks for asking.
I did get the vaccine while breast feeding because I am high risk and for me another important thing to consider for lactating women is the transmission of antibodies. Even if mRNA is transmitted via breast milk, that still does not automatically prove that it has an impact on the health of the child. Otherwise the baby might benefit from the antibodies. So to make the right decision I think both has to be taken into consideration. The possible negative effect from the mRNA vs the possible positive effect from the antibodies.
Thanks for sharing how you weigh your benefit and risk. We have no direct evidence that the mRNA from breast milk are found in infant's blood.
How do I sign up to talk to you?
Thanks for reaching out.
My goal is to understand more about long COVID, and I hope to conduct some patient interviews to understand the extent of the condition.
It will NOT be a medical consultation where I would provide any treatment recommendations.
If my interviewees agree, I may also share that on my channel. Certainly, we can do an interview without making it public. I completely understand and respect individual privacy.
Is this type of interview interest you? You may use the following link to schedule a meeting with me.
calendly.com/drhongpharmacy/30min
Due to my daytime job, I can only have time slots in the evening outside of normal business hours on the East Coast (US).
@@DrHongsPharmacyClassroom Thank you. Signed up.
@@oldschool8292 where are you from
@@yashtiwari4885 California. I did connect with Dr Hong.
Notice you were careful not to use the offensive word “ women” .
You called nursing mothers “lactating volunteers” and at the end, another much nicer word - “people of child-bearing age “ .
So relieved you didn’t utter that awful ‘women’ word . Thousands of years of use by our ignorant forebears but now we are enlightened enough to realise that women have no right to be called as such. They have unfairly created such an exclusionary term, ‘women’ and the history of women’s struggles are just not worth recognising - because ‘men’ can give birth and breast- feed too.
You were wrong.
Surely the miniscule amount of mRNA would remain in the mucosae of the mouth and the GI tract, if it were to enter cells and start producing spike protein then the immune response would be IgA antibodies, and that would only happen if the quantity of mRNA was sufficient to circumvent the child’s innate immune system. Don’t forget that breast milk contains IgA from the mum. Also infants are subject to all manner of viruses, including +ssRNA viruses which act as their own mRNA.
Conjecture.
But the point is, there's no way pfizer didn't know this
@@69birdboy if an event only occurs rarely then the probability of it being picked up is small. That is why there’s post marketing surveillance. The mRNA is only secreted in milk for a few days post vaccination. Most of what I said is not conjecture. As mRNA from any source never enters the nucleus it cannot affect the host DNA. mRNA itself does not last long in the body. If you look at the numbers it is picograms to the millilitre, or 10^-12 grams to the millilitre that were detected, that is minuscule.
If we look at it from the mothers' perspective (or every woman who received the injection), what are the implications of the presence of EV's with vaccine mRNA to breast health? Surely these EV'S are capable of entering the cells of the breast tissue? What will be the long-term implications be of breast tissue cells making spike proteiens?
The more important implication is that this means that if mRna can be passed on to baby via breast milk, means that mRna can be ingested orally into the human body. And if that can happen, that means mRna can also be ingested orally via other food sources as well. Now think of the implications of that. Even HIV cant be transmitted this way.
@@huiyinghong3073 I have been suggesting that for a while that is probably on our on our food and water sources. I just don't see how it can't be. I sure hope in wrong on this one.😔