UNSW - Aerospace Structures - Thin walled Beams (Bending)

Beam View of Aircraft Structures
Shear Force and Bending Moment Diagrams
Thin-walled Approximation
Centres and Axes
Moments of Area
Unsymmetrical Bending
For educational purposes only. Although care is taken to confirm the content of these lectures, the lectures should not be used for professional engineering activities. The author and presenter of these lectures takes no responsibility for the validity of these lectures beyond what is required as a lecturer at UNSW.

[@teddymatthew600]

Thank you for the lectures! Is there a link to the rest of the video about the thin wall approximation in bending? Thanks!

[@furkansaglam7381]

Omg! The most important part is missing 😢(thin wall approximation). Where we can find that ?

[@SAINIVEDH]

where can i find the remaining lecture?

[@tashfeenuk]

I really like the lectures, is it possible anyone can number them on where to start and how to proceed?

[@mohamedezzat5767]

Thank you :) .. It's really helpful but where is the rest of the Chapter if you please there is another video I need its link

[@joseangel5624]

Thank you, wonderful videos. It would be great to have one on damage tolerance of metallic structures.

[@purichmunlow8605]

Which chapter is this lecture in the book (Aircraft structures for engineering students)?

[@zarakhaliq6163]

These videos are great!
THANK YOU

[@abheendrabandary5940]

sir regarding the SFD it 8.05 i think it is the opposite to that you have drawn like if it is flipped (correct me if am wrong)

[@AerospaceStructures]

You are probably right. I have to admit that I'm generally not careful with sign convention for these examples. In the end, the "sign" of a shear force doesn't matter too much unless we are doing superposition. The one I should be more careful about is bending moment as this one can completely change the stresses in the calculation.

[@btsismylifeuindianarmy4909]

It's really helpful. Thank you!!😇

[@invisibleman2059]

Is there a part about "Warping"? I want to know, about exercise 10.18 of Megson 4th-Edition, why "Pr" about point 2 is 50!
For 1 is ok, s=50 and pr=25.. If i'm considering the external point; the same reasoning for 3 s=38 and pr=75.
But if i do the same procedure for 2, i don't undestand why pr is 50 and not 75; s=50, is ok!

[@JabirMvengara]

Do u thin that first shear force diagram for cantilever is right ??? Pls explain

[@AerospaceStructures]

Are you talking about the SF diagram at around 8:00? This is correct if the wing had a point load (i.e. engine) right out at the wing tip.

[@xuanmingzhou4325]

from Nottingham university

[@mohiuddinsazzadmohiuddinsa1111]

is there any lecture on torsion?

[@AerospaceStructures]

Torsion is covered is this one: czcams.com/video/eXdWs7xPM4Q/video.html

[@danieljones6862]

Can we get the 2400 video's? haha