SCRUB: NASA Scrubs Launch of Artemis I to the Moon Aboard SLS
Vložit
- čas přidán 2. 09. 2022
- After a previous scrub, NASA is making a second attempt to launch the Space Launch System (SLS) rocket on the Artemis I mission, an uncrewed test flight of SLS and the Orion spacecraft around the Moon. Liftoff is scheduled for a two-hour window that opens Saturday, Sep 3 2022 at 2:17 PM (18:17 UTC) from LC-39B, Kennedy Space Center, Florida.
Forum coverage: forum.nasaspaceflight.com/ind...
If you are interested in using footage captured by this stream, please review our content use policy: www.nasaspaceflight.com/conte... - Věda a technologie
You've heard of the "Edge of Space"?
This fall, NASA presents "Space Edging"! We'll get there, but you gotta wait for it.
Sounds sexual
Cracking me up 😂
😆😆😆 Without edging... I don't want it.
I've date gals who experts doing that. After a number of "foodie calls" (yes that happened back then also), I never got the go for launch...just for lunch.
Feels more like they’re giving us a space wedgie.
Back in the sixties, there were many, many Mercury and Gemini launches that had half of America getting up very early, only for the flights to be repeatedly scrubbed at the last minute of the countdown. 9 months later, there were blips in the birthrate.
As a "blizzard baby", I can corroborate this kind of thing.
Are you saying rockets can get pregnant??
@@magnetmountain33 ok
@@magnetmountain33 u ok ?
So when the launches got scrubbed, men were tasked the mission to explode instead?
Every Time I have seen a poll on live stream chat asking launch or scrub I chose scrub. Perfect score so far.
Congratulations. You're a Negative Nancy winner.
Great commentary guys. Best space livestream I've ever heard. Funny, light hearted... way different to the old boring NASA telecasts.
Just 2 billion more to launch
Yeah , but freemasons will never step on the moon again...
Glad you guys haven't turned off your comments, all the official feeds turned them off cus they can't take the critical commentary of the SLS abundant and continued failures
Remember folks....
“Engineering is the art of modelling materials we do not wholly understand, into shapes we cannot precisely analyse so as to withstand forces we cannot properly assess, in such a way that the public has no reason to suspect the extent of our ignorance.”
Except everything on SLS has already been used and proven. These Knuckleheads just don't know how to screw things together correctly.
@@thakard you do not know what you are talking about
We went to the moon on the lowest bidder.
Except spaceflight is not a new or not understood thing lmao
@@ne2i Fun fact, NASA is incapable of reaching the moon. They didn't just need help from the german scientists back in the 60s, they had to put them in charge of the project.
Great job as always guys.....Thanks!
After all this scrubbing you would think that the system is clean by now.
@@whybother1887 yeah, but they "missed _this_ spot from LAST time !
It did even get off the ground. Who knows how many more issues they will have after it launches. Just ask Starliner.
@@wesleydeng71 That is a legit question, however only the Orange part is Boeing.... and even that is not 100% Boeing. The part that matters there are the RS-25's that will not have issues. After the core is empty, its up to ESA for the rest.
Ah yes, another day in which *something hits the griddy* and the launch is scrubbed 😭😭
Hi Mr Pinochet Glad To See That You Are Alive & Well And Still Killing People And Killing Your Opponents!!!👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
@@andrewhillis9544 W
NASA: Nautics And Swimming Agency
I love that we are going back to the Moon I was 12 when Apollo 11 went there I got to stand on Coco Beach and watch it go
Same here I was 11 living in Clear Lake near Houston 2 miles away from Mission Control. Everyone in the city was up all night. The astronauts lived down the street from us.
I still think Starship will make it to space before SLS does.
SLS = Senate Lobbying System.
If it wouldbt have been for stoopid Americans being BORED of the moon after 6 landings then NASA wouldnt have stopped going there and wouldnt have been FORCED by Republican presidents to build the space shuttle instead !!!
But sure ... NOW entitled Americans are going to bit&h and moan about them not going fast enough.
😂😂😂 True story.
They are just actually launching this to save face because they know they wasted a lot of money on it🤣🤣🤣 I'd be willing to bet they'll abandon this entire program when Starship starts operating. How much did that launch tower cost tax payers? Almost a billion? How long ago did they promise it will reach the moon? And I won't be surprised if they abandon this altogether without even launching.
@@obbie1osias467 Remind me ... When did we see the last Starship launch ?
@@mysticmarble94 They haven't even launched a major one as this one, but I'm sure it won't take SpaceX decades and unimaginable amount of wasted tax payer's money to make their moon mission possible.
They need to play TLC's "No Scrubs" over the intercom for the next launch!
Hahaha 🤣
I don’t believe you were around for space shuttle challenger
@@kevinfinnegan310 clearly not!
Seems at _THIS_ point they should just scrub the whole thing,
sell what they CAN to Space-X ,
the rest to ANYONE interested,
and call it *DONE* .
And NASA sent 3 men _to_ the moon on a 3-Day trip nearly *FIFTY YEARS **_AGO_* ?!??
Challenger= Nature and Science combining to tell good people not to do something.
But they did it anyway.
Hell, I'll get a rocket to the moon before NASA at this rate. Back to my backyard barn workshop. Don't worry guys. I got this.
YOU ARE THE CHOSEN ONE
@@straightupgamer354 Yes, by damnit I will put these Biotechnology and Aerospace Engineering and IT certs to use for something more than building useless junk in the backyard 😅. You guys want anything back from the Moon? 🚀 🌝 lol
You got this Farmer
you are a musk fanboy that likely doesn't even know how to use a wrench
@@marcus_b1 cheez plz
I guess this shows the benefit of SpaceX's use of not totally complete ships and try all their connections as they get closer to a ready to go rocket launch.
I’d attribute it more to SpaceX not using hydrogen. Not that I don’t love the hell out of Falcon and it’s reusability, but I think this is really more of a great reminder what a picky finicky thing are cryogenic seals for an element as tiny as hydrogen.
Seems at _THIS_ point they should just scrub the whole thing,
sell what they CAN to Space-X ,
the rest to ANYONE interested,
and call it *DONE* .
And NASA sent 3 men _to_ the moon on a 3-Day trip nearly *FIFTY YEARS **_AGO_* ?!??
@@ChuckvdL You realize he's talking about starship, not falcon right?
@@phoenixrising4573 Still no hydrogen.
... this ain't no firecracker there ... one BIG BOOM ... could be the last thing you hear ... let 'um scrub all they need ... they just want it right the first time ...
GO GO GO ...when your ready ...
“We made it to the moon in the 60’s!” Apollo wasn’t a program for exploration. It was a program dedicated to beating Russia.
Exactly. People keep forgetting that. The space race was fueled by war and the desire to defeat an enemy to a destination.
And now it's not only for U.S., but also for mankind as a whole!
You have made stupid sci-fi movie. That's all. Apollo was a scum.
CNSA > NASA
@@AniWho268 The only desire which US has is f...g propaganda.
Oh well Great job as always NSF here's to third time lucky
Two wet dress rehearsals + two scrub launches = 4 hydrogen leaks. And Bechtel has the billion $ contract for the next ground zero tower. Is that wise?
Would you prefer the rocket explode on launch??? Like what kind of stupid comment is this.
@@probablynotabigtoe9407 Certainly not. But after 60 years of dealing with cryo hydrogen and four goes with this rocket with the same problem some designer's head should roll.
@@probablynotabigtoe9407 The kind of comment that faces reality: We're watching Pork Barrel space contracts getting obsoleted in real-time.
I wish you internet experts would go down to the Cape and fix this.
The tower is working just fine. They had an over pressure in a different line from Friday that caused a leak... and a major one. They hinted in the evening press conference that some seals may have ruptured. Probably busted some O-rings on the service lines. The very sad part of this is that they will have to roll it back to the VAB, so the next launch window will be at the end of September.
Notice Tesla figured it out???? No one wants to share tech????
HERE HOLD MY BEER
I got a BOTTLE ROCKET
You've got a Wes Anderson film? Rights to the sequel maybe??
This getting to be ridiculous. *shakes head* Thanks NSF - see you next time! 👊
It's almost like it's rocket science.
@@JamesHunyar Yup. I'll be back. 😎
That was sooo cool
What does one expect when the whole thing is cobbled together from old shuttle parts. Christ the bloody engines on the core stage are from one of the retired space shuttles 🙄
Yes indeed and Boeing charged NASA for new parts when they used used ones to cobble it together and overcharged them for it
Worse than new parts, they were high-priced antiques.
@@Andrew-13579 They BELONG in a MUSEUM! :)
Seems at _THIS_ point they should just scrub the whole thing,
sell what they CAN to Space-X ,
the rest to ANYONE interested,
and call it *DONE* .
And NASA sent 3 men _to_ the moon on a 3-Day trip nearly *FIFTY YEARS **_AGO_* ?!??
yup!👍🏻
From Australia its nice to see
Another scrub for technical issues is not good. I can see this rolling back to the shed for some million dollar flex tape!
😆😆😆
NASA scrubbing for the 2nd time a long overdue super expensive rocket wasnt disappointing really, it was already expected.
I garentee that space x and blue origin will put a base on the moon long before the government does
Never give up!
People arguing about how we made it in the 60s without considering that the risk rate at the time was freaking higher, Collins was literally orbiting the Moon alone, something that is terrifying honestly.
Didn't have the computer simulation we have today. Everything had to be tried and tested manually to see if it would work.
@@daisy_jericho_seth the tax dollars for space are not actually spent in space- they are spent at home keeping folks working giving them the means to help keep others employed locally- what comes around, goes around- capische?
@UCIGHn37HjEenz8vqmpkn9SA it's so hilarious when people think just saying "van allen radiation belts" is enough to win the argument. 99% of the people who say that have 0 idea about what the van allen radiation belts are. it's a zone with more radiation than usual around the earth, and it is not a magical barrier. it has been extensively studied and we know it's able to be passed because we have before. the astronauts vitals were monitored the entire mission on all the apollo missions and there was no significant risk when it comes to radiation.
yeah, because in sixtie we had balls, to day we are pussy 😂
And YET we _DID_ it - risk & ALL .
Seems at _THIS_ point they should just scrub the whole thing ,
sell what they CAN to Space-X ,
the rest to ANYONE interested,
and call it *DONE* .
And NASA sent 3 men _to_ the moon on a 3-Day trip nea"rly *FIFTY YEARS **_AGO_* ?!??
My father was booster launch engineer who worked in the block-house for Mercury and Gemini. (You can see him at his station in Kennedy center tour historical videos) He ***KNEW*** he would live to see a man walk on the moon. He did not expect that he would live to see the LAST man walk on the moon. He died in 2018.
There are many men of his generation who have past seeing the promise of manned space squandered by NASA and its turf protecting and the venality and short sightedness of politicians.
Over FIFTY YEARS man has not returned to the moon. Every day I pray that Elon Musk lives a long an happy life and achieves the goal of making humans a multiplanetary species because I do **NOT** believe the government and its vultures in the military industrial complex care one whit about that as long as they make their money.
I am trying my best to not be bitter. Some days are harder than others.
NASA's priorities changed. They wanted to create a reusable launch vehicle, and establish a permanent base in Earth orbit before they headed out further into space, both of which are necessary steps. I don't fault them for doing those things, but they have really taken their time before continuing manned space exploration. It's time to resume the quest.
@@howardsmith9342 lmao NASA's priority is shoehorning in a trans BIPOC into as many positions as possible.
@@bacon1564 Now it is, but at the end of Apollo it wasn't. It was build a space shuttle and use it to build a space station.
@@howardsmith9342 If you read the objective documents for post Apollo, you are correct up to a point. the late 60s NASA recognised the absolute need for re-usability and thus the space shuttle was a good first attempt at reusability. It ended up being more refurbish able, but it was a solid attempt to genuinely move the work in the right direction. Now we come to the follow on from shuttle. This should have addressed the issues which would allow refurbish to become rapid re-use, but it was much easier to just give the senate an easy decision and keep the same old tat that was used on the shuttle. They basically ducked the challenge because it was too hard and they are a shadow of their predecessors. Anything for a quiet life = 21st century NASA. If it wasn't for the private sector, the bunch of clowns at NASA would run round in circles and ultimately give the whole circus away.
@@howardsmith9342 They failed at the reusable vehicle, utterly. Not only was it overtly dangerous, it was not re-usable, only refurbishable.
let's all work together to design a new quick disconnect adapter for the liquid hydrogen filling line.
LOL
I propose giant Schrader valves. Those things never leak!
This is what happens when you use hoses that decompose like straws at star bucks.🥤
@@primrosereceptionist611 LMAO
Why does it need to be quick disconnect at all? Why not standard pipe thread with yellow Teflon tape? 😀
Or a compression fitting with a big spur gear on the compression nut and an electric motor to drive the nut righty-tighty or lefty-loosey prior to launch? At T-30 sec, the valves close and the big 8” nut is driven lefty-loosey. At engine start, the pipe swings away. If engines don’t start and it’s a scrub, the 8” nut gets driven back tight again so that de-tanking can happen.
Everything is possible when we believe.Hope we will reach our goal in the next launch👍❤️✨ My hearty congratulations for the success of the next launch🚀🚀
I believe I can fly
Return to the moon......perhaps with a 50 years old saturne 5 rocket (powered by 5 reliable engines)!
that's basically what this is lol. saturn v with old space shuttle parts
@@captainjirk9564 I know, they put space shuttle engines on the rocket.
Oh darn. I guess now I'll need to go outside and mow the lawn.
Very nice
IT MIGHT BE QUITE AWAILE BEFORE THIS TAKES FLIGHT. WILL KEEP WATCHING
Rule #2. Never show a rocket exploding. Never.
SpaceX would beg to differ.
@@JBDazen SpaceX didn't have to contend with congress. Musk and his investors were only beholden to themselves. They can afford to embrace their fuck ups. NASA on the other hand has to deal with the government and a ton of selfish ignorant boomers who will cut off funding if they see any rockets fail.
@@JBDazen 🤣🤣😂😂
Would get pretty nervous now if i was one them astronauts for the real mission
I mean if anything this shows that they aren’t gonna launch if there’s any kind of issue
@@aaaaaa-nr5mo he's just another musk fanboy
@@SpaceGhost1701 how is that being a fanboy he just says that nasa wont launch when there is a hydrogen leak
has no crew in artemis 1
Trueeeeee
Thanks for getting us ready for football season! Now, can you explain what that tall tower in the background was? Some new form of goal post?
Absolutely !! And ANOTHER _MISSED_ goal attempt :=/ .
Yes ur on clear
in these comments a bunch of musk fanboys that think playing kerbal and watching scott manley (another musk fanboy that works for apple and has zero aeroscace experience) videos make them rocket experts
Hey, Scott Manley is a great person. He's in full support of NASA, SpaceX, Boeing, and other Aerospace companies working together. The people here who think they understand the science because of him are the idiots here, not Scott Manley lol.
You think the "TV" experts are better?
@@johncherish7610 Something wrong? Also, you do realize the Shuttle is what lead to vastly stricter launch guidelines because of Challenger, right? NASA doesn't fly unless everything is 100%. SLS has never even flown before. The Shuttle had tons of scrubs before it began launching on a consistent basis. Shuttle was also a bit more reusable, and there were MULTIPLE Shuttles. There's only ONE SLS at the moment, and it hasn't even flown yet. Quit acting like you understand how this works. This is literally the second scrub. Shuttle went through many before it finally began flying. Same with Apollo, Mercury, Gemini. This is part of the process.
SO many Rocket experts in comments
musk fanboys
"hOw EmBaRrAsInG fOr NaSa"
"yOu'Re GrAsPiNg At StRaWs"
"CaN't BeLiEvE iT bRoKe AgAiN"
Gotta love the smooth brained fools who don't understand this is all normal and a part of the process.
@@madezra64 it’s not that it “broke” again that gets me. It’s the fact that we’ve as a nation spent so much money for a rocket that is so politically motivated and is so extremely far over budget and deadline. NASA has the highest quality of QC and testing. It’s not on NASA it’s on the contractors. The cost+ nature of funding for these projects is an asinine way of funding. It isn’t designed for success it’s designed for ripping off the American people. I think NASA will soon learn that private companies like SpaceX, BO, and others are much more motivated to succeed than cost+ contractors. Because private companies are motivated by profit. Anyway, the SLS is a really amazing engineering project and the tech is really cool. But it’s just too expensive for what we’re going to get out of it. We can deff do it cheaper through more launches with smaller rockets.
@@jonathanfairchild USA has Already Wasted Trillions By War and by supplying Weapons to other countries like isreal.
Thanks everyone
SLS will be carrying a secondary payload, a series of shoebox sized satellites that it will jettison as it travels towards the moon.
So was the leak with the ground equipment or in the internal piping of SLS (Sorry. Didn't watch the entire stream)?
It's a quick disconnect this time around. They had an inadvertent over pressure during fill, and probably broke an O-ring. (per the status update press conference).
“The Final Frontier!” Been that way for NASA expensive space projects!
sad we need to keep waiting that keeps us waiting again
What a wonderful movie 🍿🍿🍿🍿🎥🎥
SpaceX would probably make the Starship launch sooner than SLS can ever launch!
unlikely, but it would be funny
Because of two scrubbed launches? 🙄
@@danieljohn560 SLS started development in 2011. Starship started in 2012. What's behind schedule? You mean the "proposed" schedules? Like being on Mars in 2022 with starship? How's that going? Is that behind schedule now? Everyday I read comments about space hardware, I am reminded that we are not on Vulcan.
@@danieljohn560 It's projected that SpaceX has already spent 12 billion on Starship, and will cost another 10-12 billion to mature. Some of that funding is from NASA and the American tax payer. The fact remains that Starship started development in 2012. Neither Starship (full stack), or SLS has flown yet. Both had expected schedules. Both found out it's harder then it looks. The proof is in the results. I don't have to prove anything. That's up to SpaceX and NASA.
Big "f" for nasa
Better-to-be-safe----than---sorry
NASA two weeks earlier : SLS is ready !!!!
SLS is becoming Scrub Launch System.
Scrubbed Leaky System
Scrub Lay Stay
Till what point will we have streaming or cameras transmiting the launch? Are there cameras on board Artemis recording the launch process?
Oh dear there must be a leak in the blip!
When you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.
Sherlock Holmes? Swear I've read that somewhere in the books
What is the relevance of that comment out of interest. What are you implying
@@will2brown50 Nothing really. Was just curious lol
@@NxckMusic not you I meant the guy who posted it. A Sherlock Holmes quotation on a scrubbed Artemis Launch
@@will2brown50 We are not Vulcans. That's what he was trying to say.
You can do it NASA 💪 ✨️
Given enough time, money and limited expectations 2022 NASA can get a less capable rocket into space than their 1960s predecessors. 50 years of NASA progress. You can fit that into the tiny little re-usable element of this re-heated 95% disposable shuttle firework.
So exciting 😁😁 Not sure exactly what time the launch is though and I don’t want to miss it!! 🙂
Surprised, not!
It IS rocket science.
Sounds like they need Joe The Plumber instead of engineers.
Old rocket science…
You've had over 40 years.
Lightspeed is almost not possible to use to use Escape Velocity at this moment.
Good luck.!🤗🚀🌎🌒🤞💗💗💗👍
Technical Gremlins?
Oh man we are in trouble.
NASA after scrub for the 6353627272th time: 💃
2nd. Your math shames your name
@@tedburg6042 How? Heisenberg uncertainty principle, SLS applies to that.
Children, Love, hearts, Discipline.
Children live on it like bread and butter and they need it more than bread and butter.
Thanks, commentators, for your comments about wet dress rehearsals, like this scrubbed launch! Wise words! It’s a great rocket and it’s so large and complicated. Let them work :-)
NASA should have been doing wet dress rehearsals prior to announcing launch attempts. SLS is so far behind that NASA is receiving political pressure to launch.
@@mikeober9773 They did at least 1 wet dress rehearsal, and they did some engine test fires too. There was testing done. Never the less, this is the first rocket if it's type, so some issues are to be expected. Let's get this thing to The Moon, not The Atlantic.
Complicated - not really. Its all based on 40 year old hardware and is completely disposable. No one's asking the first stage to handle a powered return trajectory and land tail first on a dime. SpaceX F9s do that at least once a week. Firing 33 raptors and then having the first stage return to base and get caught in mid air with the second stage horizontally air breaking, then flipping vertical to be caught in mid air. That's complicated. NASA are living in the comfortable contract plus past and SLS is proof of that fact.
@@philcanny6356 Just because it's application is simpler, does not mean the rocket itself is simple. One of the main goals of Space X with Super Heavy and Starship is to simplify the rocket. That 40 year old hardware my be mostly a known quantity, but it's not simple. Aside from that, this is the first time that it's been put together in this way. You're not going to hear me saying that government programs can do it batter than a motivated private industry, but that rocket is NOT simple.
SLS's flight trajectory? That may be simpler than something that has to land on a point, but getting it off the pad in the first place may very well be quite complicated.
@@saulekaravirs6585 They did not and STILL HAVE NOT "tested as you fly".
They have **NEVER** successfully completed a wet dress rehearsal. That is Xprojects/testing 101.
NASA and its vultures of the military space complex *FAIL* rocket 101 class. Not good for a 70 year old student.
God ain’t letting’ SLS launch before starship
I think it's more the FCC won't allow Starship launch until after SLS launches. If Starship, which is privately funded, launches first, support for SLS will wither on the vine.
To the ocean
Have they set for a launch for Monday or Tuesday????
STRIKE 2!
So launch delayed again? Jesus...give the funding to spaceX
EXACTLY
Why? They had plenty of scrub missions in the development of the falcon.
If private industry wants to claim space then let private industry fund themselves.
Feels like every launch of new rockets the past full year has been just scrubbed.
When SLS, when Starship.
Starship is not claiming to be a product, it is an iterative development and is expected to fail during development, that's why it is iterative. Starship is trying to do several truly significant things that have never been done before and it will spawn a variant that will allow Artemis to actually land a man on the moon.
SLS is supposed to be a finished product and it is not moving any frontiers, other than the staggering cost per launch. It is less capable than a Saturn 5 from 50 years ago. It should be able to come straight out of the hangar and launch. But it can't because it was designed and built badly on a concept that was out of date in 1981.
thank ewe slowmo
I wonder who will be filming the moon landing this time and when did they go to the moon
Of course. They have to get the film crew there first. Then they gotta eat so the commisary people.
So many have to get things ready.
So sad that bits keep breaking down on this huge rocket that took so long to build - so long that it's a piece of history, an old-timer, we're trying to get into space. 😕
It's like taking gramp's Chevy that's been sitting in the barn for 25 years to the drag strip, lol. Everything's going to break at least once.
Both of you are fundamentally wrong on many levels. The issues are impressively minor for a new rocket. The real problem here is that they can't test these cryogenic quick disconnects in the VAB. They'll work it out. Both of your comments remind me of the hyperbole vomited out about the JWST before it's flight.
@hawkdsl For a rocket that expensive, made of well known space shuttle parts and build in such a long time, the issues seem to be pretty major.
Uuuuu I 💖💖💖💖💖 U Guys !!!!!!
Look at all that venting Don’t you mean a helium leak
Why not just use the FALCON HEAVY to launch this capsule..!?
I thought that too, but i think the size of capsule not fit on Falcon heavy
Too heavy
Too far away.
But right however: assembling a lunar mission in LEO with 3-4 Falcon Heavy launches could:
- be done tomorrow
- be reliable
- way less expensive.
But then, the politics wouldn't have their huge p*n*s to look at, and that's why.
Monday....Not...they r going to bring it back into the space garage.
Hi, what time is rocket launch
What is the point?
It's He³ and Li.
So Great 😍 I love you all again 🇻🇳👍🇪🇺👍🇺🇸👏🏻🎸🌈
We need a new Wernher von Braun at NASA
Starship might as well launch first
Flyyyy😃
When’s next launch date?
oh !
WE ARE (not) GOING, AGAIN!😆
Sad to see it not launch again. Hope it can launch very soon and not wait another 50 years lol
Could please someone call back Wernher von Braun, Rocco Petrone, Kurt Debus, George Mueller, George Low and the others in the dream team ?
These leak issues are nothing new to me even though this is a "new" rocket. But hold on. SLS Is using shuttle technology. The quick connect where the hydrogen leak problem happened had come up couple times on the shuttle tanks
Always better to scrub than have an accident later....can be relaunched another day
Get a grip people, there’s a leak in a fuel connection to the vehicle and y’all like “that thing is never going to the moon!!!1!1!1, it’s unsafe NASA can’t build rockets!!1!!1” 🤦♂️
SpaceX can
they should just redo the WDR until finish
@@yx9y0 Then you assume wrong. Just because a project is over budget does not mean mechanical parts like seals in this case can’t break.
@@yx9y0 Shit brakes no matter how much time and resources you have 🤦♂️
Sudo apt-get upgrade
Ah well!
I think that it's time⌚ ⌚
NASA still rendering the Moonshots..?
so Das explanation makes no sense to me. Ofcourse they can load liquid H2 across that quick disconnect and cool it down to "where things shrink" and check if it leaks. They don't need to be configured for flight to check one joint.
SLS Artemis 1 return to the workshop,
1000 years later~~~~~ still sitting on the pad