Wolfram Physics Project: Why we Chose to do Science in the Open with Q&A on the Backstory

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 20. 04. 2020
  • Stephen Wolfram & Jonathan Gorard continue answering questions about the new Wolfram Physics Project, this time specifically to answer questions about the backstory and why the project was chosen to be available publicly. Begins at 1:53
    Originally livestreamed at: / stephen_wolfram
    Stay up-to-date on this project by visiting our website: wolfr.am/physics
    Check out the announcement post: wolfr.am/physics-intro
    Find the tools to build a universe: wolfr.am/physics-tools
    Find the technical documents: wolfr.am/physics-documents
    Follow us on our official social media channels:
    Twitter: / wolframresearch
    Facebook: / wolframresearch
    Instagram: / wolframresearch
    LinkedIn: / wolfram-research
    Stephen Wolfram's Twitter: / stephen_wolfram
    Contribute to the official Wolfram Community: community.wolfram.com
    Stay up-to-date on the latest interest at Wolfram Research through our blog: blog.wolfram.com
    Follow Stephen Wolfram's life, interests, and what makes him tick on his blog: writings.stephenwolfram.com
  • Věda a technologie

Komentáře • 29

  • @TheMemesofDestruction
    @TheMemesofDestruction Před 3 lety +1

    42:33 - Computational Space Flow

  • @kenking145
    @kenking145 Před měsícem

    i dont know math but as a musician, this is interesting. everything youre saying is how would i articulte chord structure, scales, modes formula
    and genres. also the perception of it and its ambiguity. fascinating

  • @Chaosdude341
    @Chaosdude341 Před 4 lety +4

    Stephen, PLEASE upload that John Conway interview! He's one of my favorite mathematicians.

  • @Sylosis333
    @Sylosis333 Před 4 lety +2

    An open sourced approach to establish new first principle frameworks sounds like something we might look back on in the future with a "why didn't we think of that sooner" sentiment. Hope to see you on more podcasts to get the word out.

    • @Hazelgaia
      @Hazelgaia Před 9 měsíci

      Trr9l999999999988889889888😊

  • @JadenJahci
    @JadenJahci Před 4 lety +1

    “THE NOW”, “Inspiration”, & “Free Range Honesty” look very good on
    you Mr.Wolfram.
    Kind Regards,
    C H A N E ...L

  • @Sylosis333
    @Sylosis333 Před 4 lety +1

    You should call the theory computational complementarity or comp comp (Comp2) for short. Since GR and QFT are emergant phenomena in the theory as far as I understand it.

  • @simonmasters3295
    @simonmasters3295 Před 3 lety

    Fascinating
    I can hardly believe what I am seeing and hearing
    I will start with the book

  • @stormwalker321
    @stormwalker321 Před 11 měsíci

    really awesome, thank you Wolfram

  • @tarkajedi3331
    @tarkajedi3331 Před 4 lety

    This is how science should be done!!! Open Science means we can watch the ideas take flight and their evolution in real time and maybe even contribute)))

  • @xemy1010
    @xemy1010 Před 4 lety +3

    BTW, for anyone who's noticed that there's over an hour of video missing here for some reason, the full stream is on Twitch. EDIT - they fixed it :)

    • @ToriKo_
      @ToriKo_ Před 4 lety +1

      @Lumitopia thanks!

    • @Chaosdude341
      @Chaosdude341 Před 4 lety

      The VOD on Twitch appears to be the same length, so I believe you are mistaken.

    • @xemy1010
      @xemy1010 Před 4 lety

      @@Chaosdude341 Looks like they fixed it - for hours after the livestream yesterday, the length here on youtube was under two hours and the first hour was missing.

  • @y86
    @y86 Před 4 lety +3

    Here is my name suggestion for the field: Rulics

    • @rv706
      @rv706 Před 4 lety +1

      With the danger that all this will became Relics... Who knows, I'm excited to see if this circle of ideas will really become our fundamental theory of physics :)

  • @Anders01
    @Anders01 Před 4 lety

    I propose the name Computics for the new kind of science. And the definition of computics is that it involves models that can be directly computed. Not indirectly calculated such as the three-body problem in physics where only approximations can be done for general solutions.

  • @princee9385
    @princee9385 Před 4 lety

    4000 years Philosophy Questioning vs 300 years Mathematical Equations vs 30 Years Computational Universality = We are still looking forward to what could be the best approach to understand and figure out the Basic Connecting Unit of Everything.

  • @adamgolding
    @adamgolding Před 4 lety

    1:10:00 but you've built the impossibility of backwards time-travel into the system?

  • @alexwilson8034
    @alexwilson8034 Před 3 lety

    My name for the theory is: unicompution
    Also you’ve discovered like Terrance McKenna that language IS reality, which really impresses me. So maybe a name like “biblio-techno” or “compulinguistics”

  • @TheMemesofDestruction
    @TheMemesofDestruction Před 3 lety +1

    NKS = “Creative use of Game Mechanics” ^.^

  • @JadenJahci
    @JadenJahci Před 4 lety

    @2:05:16 to 2:05:21
    Was rather impressive.
    Kind Regards,
    The Millennium Falcon

  • @andrewkelley7062
    @andrewkelley7062 Před 4 lety

    Just wondering if anyone has found anything analogous to friction or drag. Sort of in a golf ball in air scenario.

    • @danielb8152
      @danielb8152 Před 3 lety

      My guess is that falls under the energy category.

    • @andrewkelley7062
      @andrewkelley7062 Před 3 lety

      @@danielb8152 more of how energy on different levels interacts. Like how light waves interact just in the form physical means. Like how a car can ride smooth on a bumpy rode or be forced above it because of the bumps.