LBW | The Laws of Cricket Explained with Stephen Fry
Vložit
- čas přidán 25. 09. 2017
- What exactly is Leg Before Wicket? Follow our handy check-list to master one of cricket's more complex Laws.
Subscribe to Lord's: czcams.com/users/LordsCric...
The Laws of Cricket explained: bit.ly/CricketLaws
This animated series has been produced as a helpful guide to clarify the Laws of Cricket by MCC.
MCC has been the owner of the Laws of Cricket since the 18th century and continues to be a robust law-maker and guardian of the Spirit of Cricket today. The current, up-to-date Laws can be found at www.lords.org/mcc/laws-of-cric...
If you have any concerns about the contents of this video please refer to our Notice and Takedown policy.
www.lords.org/our-organisation...
Facebook: / lordscricket
Twitter: / homeofcricket
Google+: plus.google.com/+lordscricket... - Sport
love how he added "and dislodge the bails" Imagine getting your appeal turned down only for the umpire to say Yeaaah it probably would of hit the stumps but dont think it would of dislodged the bails XD
I mean, this World Cup...
Poor Rashid :(
@@shubbbb What happened this world cup? I don't remember any such case?
@@shahzaibishaque in this world cup, the bails that they used were so heavy that a total of 3 times, the ball hit the stumps but the bails didn't fall off. I don't exactly remember all 3 instances but I do believe one happened in the Ind v Aus match.
adsonkool Imagine if you would *have* used proper English
What I got from this: the makers of this rule decided to make it as complicated as possible for a bit of fun
I think a British Parliamentary committee was set up to add this law
@@gurbindersekhon8240 Possibly, because it is not exactly accurate. A batsman can be out LBW if the ball does not pitch anywhere but hits him on front of the stumps if the umpire thinks that the delivery would have gone on to hit the stumps. An umpire should also take into account how far a ball has travelled from pitching to hitting the batsman before being relatively "certain" that the delivery would have hit the stumps. Imagine you are a batman playing a spinner well in front of your crease. If the ball only travels a foot after pitching before hitting you in front of the stumps, would you be entirely happy that an umpire "knew" it would hit the stumps? Some people have been watching too much Hawkeye where the ball always goes straight on and is always rising after it has pitched.
I think its pretty fair, not out if the ball pitches on the leg stump is pretty valid because the leg would always be in front of the bat which the bowlers would exploit
@@user-sj9xq6hb9pThere was some debate about the leg stump bit back in the day. I remember one of the arguments being that it should be out regardless of whether or not the ball is pitched wicket to wicket because it's the responsibility of the batsman to stop the ball from hitting his leg and if he is beaten by the bowler then it is the right of the bowler to be able to claim the fruit of his hard work. The motion even got a majority, but it didn't get 2/3rd of the vote so it was rejected. Funnily enough, the supporters of the motion in those days (this was more than a 100 years ago) thought that this rule amendment was necessary in part because the batsmen were scoring too many runs. Imagine what they would say if we told them of the totals we see today in just 50 overs!
Please throw some light on Duckworth Lewis method
Video will play for lifetime
Anand Sharma Try here. czcams.com/video/q-1HSZ3o6ow/video.html
Now we need the "who hits more boundaries, will be the winner" rule too.
I mean it's a pretty simple rule, the video would only need to be ten seconds long
There you explained it
Why you so butthurt like your team was in the finals
@@hijack69 haha
This was explained very well. Stephen Fry has a great voice, very eloquent.
You must be joking. I'm more confused now than I was before!
I didnt know about the point of impact rule completely, now I understand. Informative video.
The most confusing way of explaining an LBW. now I know less about LBW after watching this
Dragon Fire dude I didn’t understand point 2 and4
@@venkatkarthik5172rule 2 states that the ball must pitch on the line or off- side of the off stump, if not it's straight away not out.
Rule 4 states that if batsmen doesn't intended to play( left the ball on its way) then impact doesn't matter. Else the impact must be on the line for the batsmen to be out.
😂😂
Why not mark lines joining the stumps on the pitch. It's such a crucial area for lbw and running on the protected area. Is there a concern such lines would alter the pitch of the ball?
Such lines would give an advantage to the bowler making their balls almost always accurate.
i don't think the umpires would agree, everybody would see the umpires mistakes clearly. I know that it must hard to concentrate on every ball bowled all day but that is what their job is . Get it right or get out.
Put simply: a batsman is out LBW if he is hit by a ball that would otherwise have hit the wicket but not if the ball:
was a no ball
;
pitched on the leg side
;
hit the batsman's bat before or upon hitting him
; or
had its point of impact with the batsman on the leg side or, if he tried to hit the ball, on the offside.
They could make the rule a lot shorter.
@@euphemiaadamson8375 That's exactly right. The rule gives the batter a break if he or she is trying to play a shot in the circumstances you describe.
There are 2 other circumstances where the ball would otherwise have hit the stumps, but the player is not out LBW. 1. The ball pitched outside the line of the leg stump, 2. The ball hit the batter outside the line of off stump. There's a further condition attached to this second situation that the batter needs to be attempting to play a shot. i.e. if the batter is not attempting to play a shot (they just stick their pad in the way for example) then even if the ball hits the batter outside the line of off stump, it can be given out LBW.
@@jonranger451 They're both in there if you read again
@@shuffleboardwizard For some reason I was only seeing your first sentence and not the other content. You are of course correct that you included these. Thanks for the correction.
Thanks Jon. Appreciate your comments @@jonranger451
Thanks a lot for the info!
The genuine attempt was an added extra section is one I never knew about.
One of the most offensive parts or cricket is when a bowler is taking wickets. The LBW rule creates a fair contest. If impact outside was out, that massively favours the bowler. The ball swings and seams off the pitch. Remember, it a bowler gets hit for 6, they can run in and bowl again. It a batters out, his days over. LBW creates and even contest
Thanks a Ton!
after watching 20 years of straight cricket match finally -connects the dots.
awesome video
sir make a video on d/l system
Offside in football and lbw cricket very necessary rule but complicated also
Here after 2nd day of IndvsEnd 2nd test.
I don't know why we have impact things when we already track the ball no matter it pitched inLine, off or onside.
Impact is important.
Please explain duckworth Lewis rules too..
Can someone please explain to me the difference between LBW and Leg bye? Thank you.
It's a run scored as a result of the ball hitting the batsman's leg or gear. (Not hands). He can score runs as in a regular delivery. Provided it is not an LBW.
Yes, leg byes are runs scored after hitting the batsman anywhere accept the hand holding the bat, assuming they aren't out lbw
What's the lbw condition for attemping a reverse sweep or a switch hit...🤔 Regarding to the leg stump..?
Whichever way the batsman was standing as the bowler runs in is how they determine it even if as the bowler releases it they switch
@Joel Wilson thought you might find this useful
You salty geezer 😂😂
@@ryanathwal8819 yep still salty not gonna lie, brilliant innings from Stokes but Jesus Christ how is Wilson an ashes umpire?
nut0003 my first reaction was that it was plumb and it clearly was, nothing obstructed his view I don’t understand how he didn’t give it out haha
@@ryanathwal8819 mate I was in disbelief, don't think there was a more obvious lbw all match. Thank god he's not umpiring any more of the ashes lol
nut0003 I didn’t know that he’s not, at least now there should be better umpiring
I didn't understand the law 36.1.4 The shot not offered rule...But here I understood very easily 😊😊
😅😅
0:56 something wrong you are speaking I guess
Its true
We want a elaborate description of LBW law.
Also make a video on empire call ao LBW
Nice
Is ball pitching legside and offside is same for left and right handed batsmens
no, for right-handed batsman, off side on his right, leg side on his left. It's reversed for left-handed batsman.
Umpires call is 36a or 36b. When was it added ?
Pretty good
In cricket, what happens if the batsman falls on the wicket while taking runs or if the wicket comes in contact with the ball? Please give a video of example
As long as they are running, they can knock the wickets over and it's not out
Are there ANY books or manuals in Britain that have NOT been read out loud by Stephen Fry?
What if he try to play and ball pitch on right side not in middle of stumps
So true
What happens in the case of a reverse sweep shot? Does the original offstump and leg stump remain the same for the batsman while deciding on an lbw appeal or does it change because of the reverse sweep shot he is attempting?
Nothing changes then. Also, just wanted to point out that you may be referring to switch hit.
What determines leg and off stump is the stance the batter took as the bowler began his run up or commenced his bowling action. Even if you change position for a switch hit after the run up has begun, that does not change leg and off stump for the purpose of LBW.
Is it same for a left handed batsman? Or pitching outside off changes to pitching outside leg?
Which stump is leg and which is off depends on the stance of the batsman. For a left handed batsman, the outside stump on his leg side becomes leg stump. And the outside stump on his off side becomes off stump.
Good animation there
We can hit the ball on back surface of bat
why not leg side pitching
as it is usefull for leg spinner
If batsman plays the ball and it pitches outside th crees and then come back and hit the wicket is it out?
Didn't understand clearly about this rule.WCC2 game explains this law brilliantly .
Can anyone explain me why was lawrence given not out??
Can anyone explain 3.0m role?
Please make a game
Sometimes balls pitches outside the line and then also it is given out. Please tell us why
Arun Sundar only if it is outside off
Are the rules same for a left - handed batsman ??
I don’t like the were the ball pitches rule cuz if you pitched it there and the leg wasn’t there wouldn’t it be out?
Why are bouncers allowed in an over and how many
0:47 WTF are you saying?
Unless the ball is a full-toss, the impact cannot be outside the line of the leg-stump.
I asked sachin he said it's body before wicket BBW not the leg before wicket LBW.
I was thinking that this will have something about umpire calls etc which is complicated stuff but😀
Nice vidieo
Last point states ball shud hit stumps and dislodge tha bails...however, in most LBW cases, if the ball is just clipping the stumps where the bails wud havr dislodged, the batsman survives. This is one of the limitations of this rule 😊
I've always wondered, as a baseball player, why people still stand in front of their wickets if this rule exists.
To be able to play.
If you're standing on either sides of the wicket, exposing them completely, the batsman can simply get bowled out.
Batsmen, generally, hit the ball in front of them, whereas in baseball the ball is frequently hit to the sides. A technically correct batsman may have his head over the ball when he strikes it which would be a physical impossibility in Baseball.
Because the bowler would burn him by hitting the stumps
@@rc210397 Ok, but you being in the way will just result in LBW so it doesn't make a difference...
@@leonhardeuler675 exactly, if the ball hits the wickets directly or your leg (and if the trajectory was towards the wickets), you're out either way. But the batsman would position themselves in a place where they can hit the ball easily. Which is by standing right in front of the wickets.
Like cause of these tips
Why not out if it pitches outside leg or impact is not in the wickets
It's the rule. Just is. Why is a batsman out caught?
What criteria is used for lbw with spinners????
exactly the same, no difference.
Sir if batsman was not playing the shot and bowl hits the pad. I know impact doesn't matter does pitching matters that time. If bowl was pitching outside will that be out or not out.
Out
If wicket was hitting
Kya Lpw leg ka back ma hota ha please reply
Batting in cricki good for gentleness, but beastly only through
"More than half the ball should be hitting the wicket" is also a LBW rule isn't it?
No, this is a International standard for overturning an umpire’s decision on DRS
Thanks for your input :) also, I checked up on it and it's up to the field umpire to decide on the wicket's outcome.
Yes, there are three umpires, but ultimately the non-striking umpire at the bowler's end has final verdict. He may consult with square leg umpire or third (TV) umpire for differing evidence, like slow motion replays and ball tracking, but its his word that goes. We hope that he is going to be impartial. It used to be that if he was unsure, he'd called for the third umpire to get his opinion, and that still can happen today, but now the teams can also call upon him in a review (DRS). This is where the "half the ball" standard comes into affect. The onfield umpire's call has more weighting, with the third umpire only being able to change a decision with conclusive proof that the decision was wrong (conclusive being these rules about where its pitching), and you'll here the third umpire over radio say to the on-field umpire to reverse his decision or to keep it, and why (eg found a small edge). The on-field's requirement for an LBW is literally his or her subjective but professionally informed opinion about it. Needing conclusive proof is also where a lot of DRS controversies lie, because the third umpire didn't have conclusive proof even though we think it was obvious eg Nathon Lyon vs NZ in 2015.
Due to complicated laws there shall be no umpire in the ground or the third umpire shall be given power to rule out first and second umpire's decision. And the players shall have right appeal to the third umpire for a legitimate decision.
i dont get how you can be LBW if the ball dosn't pitch in between wicket to wicket, for example it's pitching well outside of the lineon the off stump side but still swing's back enough to be hitting the wicket. why is that out ? it's not in line with the stumps ?
It needs to *hit* you in line with the wicket, not pitch in line with the wicket (provided it's not pitched outside leg stump). Where it pitched is only important if assessing whether it pitched outside leg stump.
Why wicket is not given if impact is outside that we have seen couple of times in WC19?What's impact really means?
Impact inline means when the ball hits the pad, leg or even body
That part should be in line with the wickets which means if the ball was not stopped by the body, ball would have hit the stumps directly.
Body and Wickets should be in same line when the ball hits the body.
(1)pitching outside off and impact outside off (2) wicket missing
If batsman try s to switch hit which is theOFF AND LEG side
No wonder why you refer us to law 36 in blue book.
When
When ball pitches outside leg it's not out... Why
If impact is outside the off stump then its not out except batter is not making a genuine attempt to play the shot.
If impact is outside off the batsmen is out unless he plays a genuine shot
Can anyone explain rule 2
Year late but in case you’re still confused here you are:
-The ball cannot pitch OR hit you outside leg stump
-It can pitch outside off stump BUT you can’t be playing a shot for you to be given out if it hits you outside off stump.
-If it pitches and hits you inline, regardless of what you do, you can be given out
-It can also pitch outside off and hit you inline with the stumps and you can be given out
why it is not out in umpires call
Legend says the umpires are protesting outside the MCC because Stephen Fry didn't care to explain the "UMPIRE'S CALL".
For spin it's different set of rules ??
No
I already knough all the rules
Then why are you watching the video?
What if the ball pitches outside leg stump but they play no shot?
Pitching outside leg stump can never be given out, regardless if batter plays a shot or not.
Still didn't find the reason why it's not out if the ball pitches outside leg stump
(1) To discourage persistent negative leg-side bowling (2) To prevent persistent dangerous "bodyline" bowling.
Also LBW changes if a ball is bowled OVER THE WICKET..OR ROUND THE WICKET !!
impact is allowed OUTSIDE Middle if the ball is bowled Over the wicket...!!
No, its exactly the same. Ball must pitch in line with the stumps or on the batsman on side
What is umpires call???
nagesh naik when a Player opts for review then the on field umpire decision is called as umpires call.
MONISH RAJ but some times when lbw ball not hit the wickets than umpires gives the wicket .because of umpires call why?
nagesh naik here the player has to opt for review, and the decision by the 3rd umpire can be overturned only if more than 48% against the umpire decision. If its less than 48% then the decision will remain as per the on field umpire call
MONISH RAJ if some videos there na than better understanding so ......
nagesh naik yes watch matches. You will understand it.
how many feets in picth
How many yorkers are allowed in an over please tell me
Saksham Sadotra As many as the bowler is capable of bowling. There are no restrictions on number of yorkers, although there is a restriction on number of bouncers in an over.
As many as the bowler wants. Getting hit on the toes isn't going to knock you out, or worse
You can also be hit elsewhere on the body and be given LBW. Sachin Tendulkar comes to mind, I believe it was McGrath bowling and it was bowled on just short of a length and Sachin crouched to avoid it but the ball just didn't bounce as expected, hit him in the shoulder and he was given LBW. I think there have been other instances of something similar happening too.
Also, since DRS has been implemented im not sure ive seen a single batsmen being given out for not offering a shot, but I could be wrong. Can anyone confirm or deny this?
It's pretty rare that they don't. But I have seen it
I’ve seen a couple, but it’s very rare. DRS has almost eliminated pad play. Now if you’re not going to play a shot, you just leave and get your whole body and the bat out of the way.
Asee graphics game m honi chahiye.
Who’s here’s after Rohit Sharma incident ? India v Eng 2nd test Day 2
If point of impact between ball and pad is outside off stump
Then is it out or not
Explain it clearly
It's should be in line. Not either off stump nor leg stump line
Kunal Zagde If the ball hits the pad outside the off stump it cannot be out unless the batsmen has not played a shot
Not out as piching should be in line
Notout if batsman offers a shot, be it a defensive shot or aggressive shot. Out if the batsman doesn't offer a shot, like when he leaves the ball and it hits the pad outside offstump
I hope shane watson is watching this!
So... I'm here simply trying to understand a scene from Bluey. I literally know nothing about Cricket except that it exists, and now I know LBW exists. And it's a bad thing I guess 😂
We want more clarity on lbw
Ball pitch outside offstump and hit pad first , hit middle stump , but 3rd empire says not out. Why?
Because batsman tried to hit and missed the ball and then ball hit pad, your case will be out when batsman try to defend.
Maybe impact is outside the offstump
@@gamingonly7954trying to hit or defend doesn't matter in lbw . What matters is offering a shot, and defence is a shot . If the batsman does not offer a shot be it a defensive or aggressive shot , the ball Hits the pad first ,it can be given out even if the impact is outside offstump, like when the batsman leaves the ball. But if he offers a shot and the ball hits the pad first , and impact is outside offstump ,he cannot be given out
@@Lathi33 yes yes I want to say the same bro just word up and down ho gaya
Whether the full toss ball is counted as lbw
Yes
@@_Manushyan_ tq bro
Yes it mentions it a little in the video. The ball doesn't have to pitch if intercepted by the batsmans body on the full ie. Before bouncing. The impact must be inline though
Pitching of ball is a absurd rule.
Thing, that's matter is wheather ball hitting wickets or not
if DESMOND HAYNES "West Indian Cricketer" is watching this video, he wouldn't have lots of LBW mistakes during 5th odi match vs pak at Georgetown, in 1993.
The pitching outside leg stump rule is really stupid. If the ball goes on to hit the stumps it must be out no matter where it pitches.
Stops negative bowling
Law must be simple if a bowl hit the stumps it's out . Why so many variables.
@@scientia.veritas if bowl is going to hit stump by ball tracking how can you use body not to get out.explain Mei.if drs is take.sometime people oversmart themself.varable are picking outside leg. Hitting outside off .that whats I am taking.more variables more you can fool system.
@@scientia.veritas variables like in drs lbw if bowl clip the stump it is umpire call. Drs is brought to reduce umpire mistake then how come a single condition can have 2 results
The maim reason why LBW rule was brought is to stop the batsman from using his body to stop the ball and to play each and every ball that is bowled to him. If you have played cricket in your life you wouldn't argue about it at all.
@@vaibhavjain-ht3zz I am saying just make rule if bowl is going to hit stump.its out . irrespective of hitting offside or pitching outside leg.i am not talking about the rule of lbw .I want it to make simple
@@vaibhavjain-ht3zz cricket like you are professional cricketer .gully cricket Mei lbw nahi hota hai.i have seen more cricket than you, you must be watching only indian match.i follow almost every match be it women or domestic league
This LBW of cricket is far ridiculous rule than football's offside
Both rules still serve to balance the game out, though. In Football, offside prevents the attack from receiving long range passes just outside the goal. In Cricket, LBW prevents the Batsmen from 'waiting' out the good bowlers by standing in front of the stumps.
Wtf it's ridiculous to call them ridiculous
umpire call??
What is umpires call
1. Umpire gives not out
2.bowler reviews decision
3.less than 50% of the ball is hitting stumps
4. Decision becomes umpires call so the batsman is not out
Can you imagine if baseball had a rule like this???
Fuckin hell...ive been trying to figure out cricket for years. I haven't gotten anywhere tho
Batting out of order rule in baseball is similarly complicated. There are three different outcomes, depending on when the appeal for batting out of order is made. This is one area where cricket is somewhat less complicated. There is no set batting order.
Anyone here after kohli dismissal at wankhede in ind vs nz 2nd test 2021
This is extremely confusing 😂