Sold my Tamron 28-75g2, Tamron 70-180, and Sigma 35mm 1.4 DG DN for the awesome Tamron 35-150. So far I’m blown away with the lens and excited to take more pics with my Sony A7 IV! Thanks Dustin for your helpful in-depth reviews! Donated to your church project as well!
I think this lens gives Sony shooters a one lens option for events and weddings, similar to what Canon provides in their $3100 28-70 F2 lens. This lens will be a pivot point for many event photographers trying to decide on a camera brand to build a kit around. It basically combines a 35, 50, 85, and 135 prime lens combo for under $2000, with great speed and sharpness. Paired with a new 33mp Sony A74, you can build a substantial wedding kit for under 5K, much cheaper than an R5 or R6 camera with an equivalent Canon one lens option.
I’m looking into getting into photography and this lens is the reason I’m going Sony. I would prefer the R6ii but I’ll save thousands of dollars going with a solid Sony camera.
Thank you for the complete review. I'm relieved to see it mirrors my experience with the lens. As I don't miss the 150-200, my travel camera bag now consists of this tamron + samyang 24 1.8 or 75 1.8 depending on where I'm going. It's simply a joy to use in the field and I haven't noticed the weight as much as I thought I would.
@@Nice-music585 yep, still love it! I'd say it's my go-to 70% of the time, the rest being when I want to travel extra light and only take a prime or two. Still love the versatility and the weight doesn't bother me anymore.
Another fantastic review. The small faults pointed out really come in at a pixel peeping level. Your images were superb with this lens. I shoot with an A7R iv and this lens would be so versatile. APS C mode is a game changer for this combo.
Great review and excellent overall performance on this new lens. Tamron has created a versatile and surprisingly sharp lens with a very useful focal range.
Great review, Dustin. Looking the pictures you posted, this lens has a wonderful rendering and it seems it inspired you. In this video i saw many beautiful images, my favorite is this one with the girl 36:21
Hi Glenn, this lens is in another class optically. The 28-200mm is surprisingly good for a superzoom, but the 35-150mm can take on the best and come out looking pretty good.
This lens whas hyped at first like a lot of things hyped. Thereafter it was, anti hyped. Good to see an in depth review that in this lens deserves the hype!
Awesome review video once again, Dustin. I've always had a stereotype view of Tamron lenses being the cheap/low-end "Fisher Price" brand of lenses, but this video has now placed them (this lens specifically) into my "consider" list. Lightroom metadata stats show the bulk of my photos to be approx within the 16-120mm range, so this lens combined with the 16-35mm 2.8 GM would be a nice fit. Thank you for all your unbiased opinion reviews. You and the Northrups are my 2 go-to sources. Happy New Year Cheers from Kingston.
Thank you for this in-depth review I watched about an year ago. This lens is the main reason why I chose the Sony FF body over all the other manufactures. When paired this lens with the new Sony A7RV with 8-stop IBIS, the 60MP FF with the sharp Over Sampled 26MP APS-C images gives me incredibly flexibilities that covers most of my professional needs. Tamron 35-150mm f/2.0-f/2.8 focal range including in APS-C mode: 35mm-39mm (APS-C range: 52.5mm - 58.5mm / available range: 35mm - 58.5mm) @ f/2.0 40mm-59mm (APS-C range: 60.0mm - 88.5mm / available range: 40mm - 88.5mm) @ f/2.2 60mm-79mm (APS-C range: 90.0mm - 118.0mm / available range: 60mm - 118.0mm) @ f/2.5 80mm-150mm (APS-C range: 120.0mm- 225.0mm) / available range: 80mm - 225.0mm) @ f/2.8 As per other CZcams reviewer when compared with the Sony 70-200mm f/2.8GM-I this Tamron lens range is equivalent of 38-162.5mm: 38mm-43mm (APS-C range: 57.0mm - 64.5mm / available range: 38mm - 64.5mm) @ f/2.0 44mm-65mm (APS-C range: 66.0mm - 97.5mm / available range: 44mm - 97.5mm) @ f/2.2 66mm-86mm (APS-C range: 99.0mm - 129.0mm / available range: 66mm - 129.0mm) @ f/2.5 87mm-162.5mm (APS-C range: 130.5mm-243.75mm / available range: 87mm - 243.75mm) @ f/2.8 What an incredible range and flexibilities on a All-in-One lens that is able to delivery the level of IQ at the professional level. I did return the Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 and replaced it with the compact Sigma 16-28mm f/2.8 just to get a bit of extra range on both end of focal length after watching your review comparing both of the lenses. Two lenses to rule the day with plenty of extra spaces for accessories! Great reviews and keep up the good work.
@@DustinAbbottTWI For a person with a lot of lens o play with that says a lot. It live on my camera 99% of the time unless I am shooting wildlife or outdoor sports in large field with the Tamron 50-400mm (thanks to your review as well). Only other thing maybe as amazing would be for Sigma to update their 18-35mm f/1.8 into a FF 27-52.5 f/1.8!
I've had mine for a week and love it. It's as sharp as the 70-180 and I sold that lens plus a 24-70 and will use this lens as my walk around landscape lens and "outing" lens. It is heavy but I rarely shoot more than a couple of hours so it's not a big deal. Thanks for another great review Dustin.
I was waiting for your review on this, but I have been extremely busy. Very well done as usual and all things considered, if you stay in the Tamron family, you could get the 17-35mm, 35-150mm and 150-500mm and you are kind of set unless you need macro functionality, you shoot sports, need longer reach for wildlife photography-(with the exception of Crop Mode on A1, A7Riii and A7Riv) or aviation type of photography. Tamron really has done an exceptional job here with the ranges that they are trying to cover.
Oh yes. Had to come back to this review. Got the lens now and it's amazing. Hefty and my biggest lens ever but I enjoy the feel in my hands, it feels so sturdy, well built and I don't regret a single cent spent. To start with I only did some outdoor photo and video and have yet to fight the probable flares when I'm shooting a music event with all those crazy lights on, but it's going to be a blast. The weight is compensated in an almost "all in one" lens solution, as mentioned below, I'll only add the Sigma 16mm f1.4 for the APS-C that I already have, and it'll give me some 22..mm for the wider shots if needed. I'm done.
@@DustinAbbottTWI Well, if _you_ bought it, it tells something 🙂 Keep up the great work! SInce I commented yesterday I went out and shot outside some more, and there's an aspect to the weight that I truly like. It adds some stability in my case. I did some pull-ins & outs in video, shot stills when zoomed in, and the weight contributes to smoother movements. It is heavy so I'll prepare well for those event shoots...
I love starting at 35mm on a FF. I love 24mm on crop sensor. I think this lens fits my needs. It's still on preorder according to BH photo. Looking forward to getting it.
Very useful video ! I'm switching from Sony to Nikon (Z8) and i'm happy that this one has got the Z mount. So i beleive this video will help me in my decision. By the way, one question, which tripod do you use at the beguinning of this video ?
I absolutely love this lens. If I used those focal lengths I would buy this. But I find myself mainly focusing on wide and Ultra Wide angles. 35mm, 20mm, 12mm
Tamron is going to make lots of revenue for this lens alone. For beginners and amateur shooter, this lens is a no brainer. Best still, this lens can astro! what a blessing! Now Tamron just introduce the Z mount version, hence it will go head to head with Nikon's Z 24-120 f4. Still waiting for my Z8. great review as always Dustin
Before I had the lens more than a week, it was the color that sold me, and that 3rd dimensionality you discussed. I simply found the images more engaging, even when shooting fall colors and rose hips around the parking lot (hey, we get out when we can). We can paraphrase the Hollies, yeah? She ain't heavy, she's my goto lens.
Another perceptive review! Seems like the Tamron is not heavier than a traditional 70-200 but covers all the bases! Have you received yet the new Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 G2? Looking forward to your review and comparison to the Sigma 28-70mm. Thanks!
I see this lens in combination with the Sigma 14-24, and perhaps something like the Sigma 105mm Macro being a killer combination! However, I'm still waiting for your assessment of the G2 version of the 28-75mm Tamron. If the optical quality is better on the updated 28-75mm think I would still be inclined to got with the 28-75/70-180 combination. Any thoughts? Great review! We need this type of quality review now more than ever.
Hi Dustin, thx for the review. I could be mistaken but i thought you said it is f2 at the wide end. Is this only 35mm or also a bit longer like on 40mm? Thx
I’m definitely feeding this lens! I love your review. I’m grabbing this soon! I definitely love the idea of putting one lens in the bag and replacing two. I would like to see how it performs with a a6700.
@@DustinAbbottTWI I’m shooting some big stuff in coming months. I’m definitely going to grab this and practice with it. I am a bit curious as to how it would perform with the new a6700.
Another thorough and informative review. I am struggling whether to replace my 24-105 lens with this lens or a Tamron 28-200 for landscape and travel. I will be pairing it with my Sony 16-35 GM (which I use for landscape and astro). You have recommendations based on your experience with the two. Using on an A7RV.
Hi Dustin, regarding to image stablization performance, what is your general feeling for the comparison between this len with Sony in-body IS vs. the older version of 35-150 2.8-4 EF with VC on?
I just prefer this new lens, period, and I've found that it works very well for me on Sony. I don't really think about it not having VC pretty much ever.
I had the Tamron 70-180 but it got lots of dust in in shortly after I started using it. Tamron cleaned it for free but I sold it after since it probably would get back. I hope this lens has that problem fixed, it sure looks tempting. Great review as always Dustin. Thanks.
man you might have convinced me to buy this! I primarily shoot landscapes so I was concerned about the size and weight of this lens since I do a lot of hiking and backpacking where weight is an important factor. I was leaning towards getting the sigma 24-70 f2.8. But after seeing your review and the image quality coming out of this lens, I'm second guessing myself. I do some portrait work on the side and having the zoom and aperture flexibility of this lens would be very useful. I may just have to put up with the weight of this lens on my hiking trips if I do decide to purchase it since it's optical performance and flexibility is that impressive, and I think it would be worth the trade-off to have a slightly heavier backpack
Consider the Tamron 28-200mm. That's exactly what I use it for - it's my hiking lens. Light, more versatile, and you'll probably be stopping down anyway.
Again very good authentic review. I would love to hear which one is better Canon RF 28-70mm F2L USM or this for that limited focal range in comparison?
Thanks Dustin, great review. I am a wide-ish guy who likes shooting long, so while this wouldn't replace a 24-XX for walk around or landscapes, it would probably see more use than my 70-180 (sold) ever saw.
well that's the review that w've been all waited for...tnx dustin i know its kinda individual question but do u think it is too bulky and heavy as a solo travel lens?
Again an excellent video. You're making the switch to Sony difficult. Difficult to chose that is, between the new G2 28-75 or this. Currently I shoot often at f2.2 with fixed lenses, 35mm IS, 45mm ( Tamron) 85mm 1.8 USM. From what I see this lens at 2.8 is very good. Would the G2 28-75 at wide open or say f3.2 be better in the range 35-75?
@@DustinAbbottTWI I can't wait!. Actually I can as the Sony A7 IV isn't out until the beginning of December in Europe. Thanks to your detailed reviews like no one else does informed decisions can be made.
Great review as always! I’ve struggled with this lens. Conceptually it makes me wonder if it’s too much of a tweener lens- neither wide enough, nor tele enough. It also seems really expensive… hmmm…
I recently took the 35-150 out to take photos of a 7-a-side soccer game, and the AF and IQ performance is top-notch even on my A7C, I would probably say the bottleneck is on the body/the Sony AF system/user-error themselves, since 150mm is a bit too short for this type of sport, my A7C couldn't pick up the eye most of the time. Also since Sony doesn't have an AF box on the body unlike some of the competitors, I'd have to resort to using zone or single point AF-C/Tracking, so there have been a few shots back-focused to the background. Other than that, I'm very impressed by this lens, it's sharp enough even cropping down to 300mm range.
Thanks for the in-depth review of this lens. Initially, I was leaning towards buying the 28-200mm Tamron lens. Now I am seriously thinking of purchasing this lens instead. Is there a lens filter that could drastically reduce this lens flare?
Hopefully, this won't sound as a bad question, but I was wondering your impression of this lens compared to the sony 24-105 OSS ? There is a little shift in zoom range, but there is sufficient overlap so that I wonder if the tamron would always be a better choice over that sony (not considering the price). From your review, it seems like the IQ, contrast, color rendition would be superior, not mentioning the possibilities of a faster lens. One caveat maybe is.. that I fear the zoom ring of the tamron is very stiff. I would appreciate your input :)
Hello from Kyiv Ukraine. I have been waiting for your opinion on this lens as I want to add this to my kit. I do not see this for me as a lens to replace others but a lens choice. I own 3 bodies and 16 lenses, 4 Tamron, 5 Samyang and 7 Sony. I like sometimes to travel around on my bicycle with a camera back pack, 1 body, filters, tripod and 3 to 4 lenses. Sometimes I will ride the metro into the city (quicker than in a car) and take a Think Tank mirrorless mover with me with 1 body and 2 lenses. This new Tamron lens means I have the choice to go into Kyiv with 1 lens or 2 if I need to go wider with the 17 to 28. This lens gives me options. I will definitely buy one. As for the tripod mount I am wondering if the one on my Tamron 150 to 500 would fit. Thanks for your excellent review once again.
Hi Dustin, I recently purchased this lens and I think it is absolutely fantastic. However I find it has a severe loss of AF-C tracking if in conjunction with zoom racking. It is a serious concern for me. I remember My original A9 with original firmware had a similar issue with the 70-200/2.8 when initially released (although not as bad). Did your copy have the same issue? I use it too with an A1 with latest firmware.
What is your primary use? I suggest trying one at the store. If you use your camera primarily in AF-c and you intend to zoom in an out while focus tracking this lens may be very limiting. There might be a major physical limitation due to the combination of strong non parafocal characteristics and large aperture.
@@armandot9137 Well even if a local store had it, I wouldn't be able to take it for a proper test outside. I use my camera in AF-C 99% of the time. I'd use the 35-150 as a general photography lens since I have a 150-600 C for wildlife and a regular 50mm 1.8 prime. I'd probably get another 16mm prime to complement the rest. But I'd love to be able to do 90% of my photography with just the 35-150 and the big gun. There are these weekly symphony concerts I attend and have been shooting for the past few weeks which is why I'm looking for that 2.8 aperture as even at it I'm pushing up to 5000 ISO to get some shots.
I learned to work around the issue when i shoot sports. I would not use it for a critical action shot but otherwise it is usable, so I am quite sure it will be fine for your applications. Optically it is fabulous, but it flares easily keep that in mind too. That fact that I still use it for sports despite this issue speaks volumes on how much I like it. In fact my frustration derives from loving it so much yet being unable to to rely on it for critical work in sports
Note that the issue is quite obvious, rack zoom fast as you are tracking a number of times at the store. If the result does not bother you you are good to go
I am wondering, is this lens going to replace the Sony 135 (or good enough to not use the 135 nearly as often) or perhaps avoid you purchasing the Sony 35 1.4. In other words, does this lens largely minimize/eliminate consideration of the 135 and/or 35?
At the moment I own the GM 35mm and 135mm, and I have no plans to sell them. I'll use the Tamron more for events and use the primes when I have time to be more artistic.
Hi Dustin, I think you said that this was a great lens for event shooters in another review of this lens, and I agree. The problem with the Holy Trinity is that it is made of 3 lenses, but most event photographers only carry 2 camera bodies. An Event Photographer could carry this lens on a camera body and the Super Wide Zoom on the other camera body. So, in this case they could leave the 24-70 f/2.8 & the 70-200 f/2.8 in their camera bag. Thanks for your time. Mathew
Great and detailed review, very precise and spot on, unlike one of the early review that bashed the AF tracking using A7R4, which nearly convinced me to cancelled my preorder but luckily didnt. As one of the first batch owners of the lens, I extremely agree that this truly is a fantastic lens, the AF is surprising quick (even in challenging dark environments, and pet eye AF works great), very sharp thoroughout the range at f2.8, pleasing colours and rendering (wouldn't feel I'm missing too much resolution compared to my GM primes except the clipping of corner bokeh balls), the range and bright aperture is extremely versatile and definitely lives up to its price and expectations. Would be perfect if its Made in Japan like the G2, higher quality plastics like Sony GM lenses and a sealed back element. Have you had any dust issues with Tamron's exposed back element design (having no glass at the mount end)? A bit worried that there would be excessive dust gathering inside the lens.
Here is the thing, Sony is under threat left right and center from its mount partners. Apart from newest GM primes and 70-200II, there is little reason to choose Sony lenses over third party offerings. Is it a bad thing for Sony? Look at what they have done to auto focus breathing correction on A7IV.
@@frankluo230 I would disagree, the 14GM, 20G, 35GM, 50GM, 135GM are all fantastic and unmatched by third party offerings or even Canon/Nikon. Focus breathing issues are just overly exaggerated but youtubers. Really don't see them too concerned with their mount partners (the budget market), if you look at their lens releases these couple of years, they're pretty much focused on completing or updating their GM collection to compete against Canon/Nikon, which is where the real threats are.
I like the focal range of this lens the most. But I would have happily trade off the f2 start point with the common f2.8 if it could've made it equal to the 70-180 in size and weight. But I get that fast aperture is one of the selling point for this lens. So I just can hope Tamron brings out a 2.8-4 version like it's DSLR one but with the optics of this new one and way lighter!
That was a great review! I would like to ask you which one should i buy? Tamron 36-150 f/2 - 2,8 or should i pick sigma 24-70 f/2,8 ? Both are great lenses i know that but it's also both too expensive. With tamron i take advantage the low range of 35 and also the beast range of 150 but with sigma i have something more standard with 24 to 70 where i cover the low range of 24. I want it for travelling.I have the Sony A7 II. Thank you!
Thank you so much for your excellent review, Dustin! Question: How would you compare it to the Tamron 28-200, although it is a different category? Is it worth the extra weight and price?
As an owner of both, the 35-150 is definitely worth the weight and price. The 28-200 has too much compromises and really is in a different league (like the difference between a kit lens and a pro grade f2.8 zoom), the 35-150 is way sharper, have smoother bokeh, better rendering and contrast, much brighter aperture, faster and more accurate AF and more utility switches/buttons.
I have the 28 200, it is very versatile but just nowhere near as good as my 16 35gm, no surprises there but I'm always disappointed when I zoom in on the pc ... Hope this lens is better
@@samtaylor4592 The 28-200 is a good "kit" lens for its price/range/aperture (relatively fast compared to kit lenses), IQ just isn't part of it, even the 17-28 is better.
very intriguing lens, would be super useful for low light events/ even as a travel lens (although a bit hefty) will be interested to see if sony will attempt to make something similar and smaller
Nice lens. I just wish these lens makers would make the zooming internal like in the 18-105. I hate the zoom extending the length of the lens, it is cumbersome and can be difficult to use when pointing camera towards the sky. It was the main reason of getting rid of the 70-300 and opting for the 70-200 and the incredible 200-600 zoom, both with internal zooming. So much superior to the other method.
This video is sponsored by Fantom Wallet. Visit fantomwallet.com/ and use code DUSTIN15 to get 15% off
This is quite heavy for gimbals, and for wallet
A nice shout out to you Dustin from Gerald Undone on this lens review. Great job and well deserved.
That was really, really kind of him, and it has already given my channel a boost.
Sold my Tamron 28-75g2, Tamron 70-180, and Sigma 35mm 1.4 DG DN for the awesome Tamron 35-150. So far I’m blown away with the lens and excited to take more pics with my Sony A7 IV! Thanks Dustin for your helpful in-depth reviews! Donated to your church project as well!
It really is an amazing lens...and thank you for the donation, Rick!
How is it holding up?
same here... I sold my 28 75 G2 and 70 180 and bought this lens... I am so happy covering all my events...
I think this lens gives Sony shooters a one lens option for events and weddings, similar to what Canon provides in their $3100 28-70 F2 lens. This lens will be a pivot point for many event photographers trying to decide on a camera brand to build a kit around. It basically combines a 35, 50, 85, and 135 prime lens combo for under $2000, with great speed and sharpness. Paired with a new 33mp Sony A74, you can build a substantial wedding kit for under 5K, much cheaper than an R5 or R6 camera with an equivalent Canon one lens option.
That's a fair conclusion, I think.
I’m looking into getting into photography and this lens is the reason I’m going Sony. I would prefer the R6ii but I’ll save thousands of dollars going with a solid Sony camera.
Really nice in-depth review on this Tamron...
Love your precise vocal delivery Dustin.
Thank you very much
Love your reviews Dustin, thanks for the awesome work!
My pleasure!
Honestly, the best review ever for this lens, congrats.
Thank you very much!
Thank you for the complete review. I'm relieved to see it mirrors my experience with the lens. As I don't miss the 150-200, my travel camera bag now consists of this tamron + samyang 24 1.8 or 75 1.8 depending on where I'm going. It's simply a joy to use in the field and I haven't noticed the weight as much as I thought I would.
That sounds very reasonable to me.
Exactly the setup I’m going for
Currently saving for one! Is it still your go to lens?
@@Nice-music585 yep, still love it! I'd say it's my go-to 70% of the time, the rest being when I want to travel extra light and only take a prime or two. Still love the versatility and the weight doesn't bother me anymore.
Fantastic review, as usual, Dustin ! I will definitely buy it very soon !
You'll enjoy it. There's a great lens.
Another fantastic review. The small faults pointed out really come in at a pixel peeping level. Your images were superb with this lens. I shoot with an A7R iv and this lens would be so versatile. APS C mode is a game changer for this combo.
I agree. I don't there is any killer flaw here.
That’s a nice detailed review clearing all the doubts related to the lenses
That's great to hear.
Thanks again for another great and extensive review that helped me decide to buy this lens.
Thanks for the review! This new gem will be a perfect match with my 16-35.
It should, for sure.
i really like how thorugh you were and this definitely helped me decide if I wanted to get this lens or not!
Glad to hear it!
I wasn’t expecting such a detailed review. Great job.
Glad you liked it!
Another great review Dustin, much appreciated.
My pleasure.
Excellent and thorough review, thank you!
Glad it was helpful!
At last someone made in depth review. I loved they changed zoom position thanks tamron
In depth reviews take time. Fortunately I've got partners who loan me lenses and give me adequate time to really review them.
Great review as always Dustin! 👏💪
I appreciate it!
Great review and excellent overall performance on this new lens. Tamron has created a versatile and surprisingly sharp lens with a very useful focal range.
Totally agree.
Great review, Dustin. Looking the pictures you posted, this lens has a wonderful rendering and it seems it inspired you. In this video i saw many beautiful images, my favorite is this one with the girl 36:21
I thought that one was special, too.
Professional as always, appreciated!
My pleasure!
Very detailed and fantastic review!
Thank you kindly!
Another great review…thank you. Interested in how you would compare the IQ to the Tamron 28-200. Glenn
Hi Glenn, this lens is in another class optically. The 28-200mm is surprisingly good for a superzoom, but the 35-150mm can take on the best and come out looking pretty good.
Fantastic video as always
Thank you very much.
Great and helpful review, thanks !
Glad it was helpful!
As always - great review! 👍
I appreciate that
always a great review and i'm lovin' mine. I do need to test out the flair issue for myself.
I'm glad you've gotten one. I hear too many complaints of people that want one but can't get it.
Thank you. Been waiting for you review.
You're welcome.
@@DustinAbbottTWI are you going to review the Sony A7IV?
This lens whas hyped at first like a lot of things hyped. Thereafter it was, anti hyped. Good to see an in depth review that in this lens deserves the hype!
That's a good way of putting it.
Thanks for this thorough review of a very promising lens. Food for thought.
You're welcome.
Awesome review video once again, Dustin.
I've always had a stereotype view of Tamron lenses being the cheap/low-end "Fisher Price" brand of lenses, but this video has now placed them (this lens specifically) into my "consider" list.
Lightroom metadata stats show the bulk of my photos to be approx within the 16-120mm range, so this lens combined with the 16-35mm 2.8 GM would be a nice fit.
Thank you for all your unbiased opinion reviews. You and the Northrups are my 2 go-to sources.
Happy New Year
Cheers from Kingston.
Thanks for the vote of confidence, David.
My view of them is changing too.
Btw, how to check the focal length we mostly use in LR?
Such an amazing review.
Subscribed***
Thanks for coming on board!
Thank you for this in-depth review I watched about an year ago. This lens is the main reason why I chose the Sony FF body over all the other manufactures. When paired this lens with the new Sony A7RV with 8-stop IBIS, the 60MP FF with the sharp Over Sampled 26MP APS-C images gives me incredibly flexibilities that covers most of my professional needs.
Tamron 35-150mm f/2.0-f/2.8 focal range including in APS-C mode:
35mm-39mm (APS-C range: 52.5mm - 58.5mm / available range: 35mm - 58.5mm) @ f/2.0
40mm-59mm (APS-C range: 60.0mm - 88.5mm / available range: 40mm - 88.5mm) @ f/2.2
60mm-79mm (APS-C range: 90.0mm - 118.0mm / available range: 60mm - 118.0mm) @ f/2.5
80mm-150mm (APS-C range: 120.0mm- 225.0mm) / available range: 80mm - 225.0mm) @ f/2.8
As per other CZcams reviewer when compared with the Sony 70-200mm f/2.8GM-I this Tamron lens range is equivalent of 38-162.5mm:
38mm-43mm (APS-C range: 57.0mm - 64.5mm / available range: 38mm - 64.5mm) @ f/2.0
44mm-65mm (APS-C range: 66.0mm - 97.5mm / available range: 44mm - 97.5mm) @ f/2.2
66mm-86mm (APS-C range: 99.0mm - 129.0mm / available range: 66mm - 129.0mm) @ f/2.5
87mm-162.5mm (APS-C range: 130.5mm-243.75mm / available range: 87mm - 243.75mm) @ f/2.8
What an incredible range and flexibilities on a All-in-One lens that is able to delivery the level of IQ at the professional level. I did return the Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 and replaced it with the compact Sigma 16-28mm f/2.8 just to get a bit of extra range on both end of focal length after watching your review comparing both of the lenses. Two lenses to rule the day with plenty of extra spaces for accessories! Great reviews and keep up the good work.
It really is a lovely lens. I personally reach for it all the time.
@@DustinAbbottTWI For a person with a lot of lens o play with that says a lot. It live on my camera 99% of the time unless I am shooting wildlife or outdoor sports in large field with the Tamron 50-400mm (thanks to your review as well). Only other thing maybe as amazing would be for Sigma to update their 18-35mm f/1.8 into a FF 27-52.5 f/1.8!
Loving that swirl in the bokeh much reminds me of an antique art lens … thank you for the review looking forward to receiving this in two days…
It's an amazing lens optically.
I've had mine for a week and love it. It's as sharp as the 70-180 and I sold that lens plus a 24-70 and will use this lens as my walk around landscape lens and "outing" lens. It is heavy but I rarely shoot more than a couple of hours so it's not a big deal. Thanks for another great review Dustin.
That sounds very much like what I will do.
Need this lens for the RF mount!! 🔥📷 Thanks for the great review, Dustin.
There's practically zero chance of that.
The holdup is Canon, not Tamron, so I'm not sure when/if we'll see that happen.
Thanks for the review. Really great. (Hopefully they'll get this lens on the RF and Z mounts at some point. Such a great all around option.
That's going to be up to Canon and Nikon. They are the sticky point.
I was waiting for your review on this, but I have been extremely busy. Very well done as usual and all things considered, if you stay in the Tamron family, you could get the 17-35mm, 35-150mm and 150-500mm and you are kind of set unless you need macro functionality, you shoot sports, need longer reach for wildlife photography-(with the exception of Crop Mode on A1, A7Riii and A7Riv) or aviation type of photography. Tamron really has done an exceptional job here with the ranges that they are trying to cover.
I really love this lens myself.
Such a great detailed review.
Thank you kindly!
Nice review. Very detailed. Interesting range 35-150mm and at 2.8 it looks bright enough for most every situation. Living up to the promise.
Exactly.
Thanks for the great Review.
My pleasure!
Oh yes. Had to come back to this review. Got the lens now and it's amazing. Hefty and my biggest lens ever but I enjoy the feel in my hands, it feels so sturdy, well built and I don't regret a single cent spent. To start with I only did some outdoor photo and video and have yet to fight the probable flares when I'm shooting a music event with all those crazy lights on, but it's going to be a blast. The weight is compensated in an almost "all in one" lens solution, as mentioned below, I'll only add the Sigma 16mm f1.4 for the APS-C that I already have, and it'll give me some 22..mm for the wider shots if needed. I'm done.
It really is a lovely lens. I bought one, myself, and I love it.
@@DustinAbbottTWI Well, if _you_ bought it, it tells something 🙂 Keep up the great work! SInce I commented yesterday I went out and shot outside some more, and there's an aspect to the weight that I truly like. It adds some stability in my case. I did some pull-ins & outs in video, shot stills when zoomed in, and the weight contributes to smoother movements. It is heavy so I'll prepare well for those event shoots...
I love starting at 35mm on a FF. I love 24mm on crop sensor. I think this lens fits my needs. It's still on preorder according to BH photo. Looking forward to getting it.
You’ll love the lens. It’s amazing.
finally pulled the trigger on this lens (along with Tamron 50-400) and you are right..this is a beautiful lens!
It’s my “if I could only own one lens” lens.
Dustin stay blessed and happy
Thank you very much!
Very useful video ! I'm switching from Sony to Nikon (Z8) and i'm happy that this one has got the Z mount. So i beleive this video will help me in my decision.
By the way, one question, which tripod do you use at the beguinning of this video ?
I absolutely love this lens. If I used those focal lengths I would buy this. But I find myself mainly focusing on wide and Ultra Wide angles. 35mm, 20mm, 12mm
Fair enough, Will
Get tamron 20-40
Can't wait wait for your review of Tamron's new 28-75 mm g2.
Should come next week.
Tamron is going to make lots of revenue for this lens alone. For beginners and amateur shooter, this lens is a no brainer. Best still, this lens can astro! what a blessing! Now Tamron just introduce the Z mount version, hence it will go head to head with Nikon's Z 24-120 f4. Still waiting for my Z8. great review as always Dustin
Great review as always! I wonder how the compression and bokah is compared to the 70-200 g2. I use the 70-200 FE on my a7iii but it’s quite heavy.
It won't have as much compression (200mm vs 150mm), but it will have more shallow depth of field at 70mm due to the larger maximum aperture.
I really like the rendering from this lens.
Me too. Images have a lot of charm to them.
Before I had the lens more than a week, it was the color that sold me, and that 3rd dimensionality you discussed. I simply found the images more engaging, even when shooting fall colors and rose hips around the parking lot (hey, we get out when we can). We can paraphrase the Hollies, yeah? She ain't heavy, she's my goto lens.
That was definitely a selling factor for me. Some lenses just have a "feel" to them that you like.
@@DustinAbbottTWI PS Dustin kudos on the DA symbol shirt in particular. Most comfortable t-shirt I own!
Another perceptive review! Seems like the Tamron is not heavier than a traditional 70-200 but covers all the bases!
Have you received yet the new Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 G2? Looking forward to your review and comparison to the Sigma 28-70mm. Thanks!
My review of that lens will come next week
Would this be weight comparable to the Sony 70-200mm f4 when attached to a body?
Thank so much!
You're welcome.
Ive always wanted this lens..
Nice video footage of my city, Kingston!
Yep! I've got a son at Queen's right now.
I see this lens in combination with the Sigma 14-24, and perhaps something like the Sigma 105mm Macro being a killer combination! However, I'm still waiting for your assessment of the G2 version of the 28-75mm Tamron. If the optical quality is better on the updated 28-75mm think I would still be inclined to got with the 28-75/70-180 combination. Any thoughts?
Great review! We need this type of quality review now more than ever.
I'll be releasing my content on the G2 this coming week, and have a comparison video filmed alreadyh.
Hi Dustin, thx for the review. I could be mistaken but i thought you said it is f2 at the wide end. Is this only 35mm or also a bit longer like on 40mm? Thx
That's correct; it is F2 on the wide end. 35mm seems about right.
I’m definitely feeding this lens! I love your review. I’m grabbing this soon! I definitely love the idea of putting one lens in the bag and replacing two. I would like to see how it performs with a a6700.
I love this lens. It is the one I reach for more than any out of my 20+ lens kit.
@@DustinAbbottTWI I’m shooting some big stuff in coming months. I’m definitely going to grab this and practice with it. I am a bit curious as to how it would perform with the new a6700.
Must-have lens
Perhaps not for everyone, but I think so for me.
Another thorough and informative review. I am struggling whether to replace my 24-105 lens with this lens or a Tamron 28-200 for landscape and travel. I will be pairing it with my Sony 16-35 GM (which I use for landscape and astro). You have recommendations based on your experience with the two. Using on an A7RV.
If you can handle the size, go for this lens. It's amazingly good in so many ways.
Hi Dustin, regarding to image stablization performance, what is your general feeling for the comparison between this len with Sony in-body IS vs. the older version of 35-150 2.8-4 EF with VC on?
I just prefer this new lens, period, and I've found that it works very well for me on Sony. I don't really think about it not having VC pretty much ever.
Fantastic review 5☆
Thank you kindly
I had the Tamron 70-180 but it got lots of dust in in shortly after I started using it. Tamron cleaned it for free but I sold it after since it probably would get back. I hope this lens has that problem fixed, it sure looks tempting. Great review as always Dustin. Thanks.
Obviously I can't vouch for the long term performance of the lens, but there is a notable difference in the building quality between the two lenses.
I'd have to agree with you on this point: Tamron and Sigma zoom lenses *in* *general* have a tendency to have poor dust sealings.
man you might have convinced me to buy this! I primarily shoot landscapes so I was concerned about the size and weight of this lens since I do a lot of hiking and backpacking where weight is an important factor. I was leaning towards getting the sigma 24-70 f2.8. But after seeing your review and the image quality coming out of this lens, I'm second guessing myself. I do some portrait work on the side and having the zoom and aperture flexibility of this lens would be very useful. I may just have to put up with the weight of this lens on my hiking trips if I do decide to purchase it since it's optical performance and flexibility is that impressive, and I think it would be worth the trade-off to have a slightly heavier backpack
I would definitely take this lens over the Sigma 24-70, myself.
Consider the Tamron 28-200mm. That's exactly what I use it for - it's my hiking lens. Light, more versatile, and you'll probably be stopping down anyway.
Again very good authentic review.
I would love to hear which one is better Canon RF 28-70mm F2L USM or this for that limited focal range in comparison?
That’s a reasonable request, though I’ve been unable to get a 28-70 loaner thus far.
This is a very exotic, interesting lens.
Exactly
Love your reviews as always.
Glad you like them!
Thanks Dustin, great review. I am a wide-ish guy who likes shooting long, so while this wouldn't replace a 24-XX for walk around or landscapes, it would probably see more use than my 70-180 (sold) ever saw.
Me too., I wish to see 20-80 F2. 8 then I can use one for all
Suddenly this lens paired with a 17-28mm or something similar makes for an intriguing combo.
@@DustinAbbottTWI I'd be very curios to hear how the sharpness and rendering compare to the 28-200 at competing focal lengths and apertures
well that's the review that w've been all waited for...tnx dustin
i know its kinda individual question
but do u think it is too bulky and heavy as a solo travel lens?
That entirely depends on you - but for me, I would say yes. It's not THAT big, and it would pretty much do everything.
Thanks for the great review. Made a pre-order purchase using your affiliate link at BH! Hopefully I'll get it before my upcoming trip.
Thank you, and enjoy!
Again an excellent video. You're making the switch to Sony difficult. Difficult to chose that is, between the new G2 28-75 or this. Currently I shoot often at f2.2 with fixed lenses, 35mm IS, 45mm ( Tamron) 85mm 1.8 USM. From what I see this lens at 2.8 is very good. Would the G2 28-75 at wide open or say f3.2 be better in the range 35-75?
Good news - I have a comparison video coming next week.
@@DustinAbbottTWI I can't wait!. Actually I can as the Sony A7 IV isn't out until the beginning of December in Europe. Thanks to your detailed reviews like no one else does informed decisions can be made.
Great review as always! I’ve struggled with this lens. Conceptually it makes me wonder if it’s too much of a tweener lens- neither wide enough, nor tele enough. It also seems really expensive… hmmm…
I think that depends on the application. For events and weddings, I think it is about perfect.
I really want to get my hands on it for live music shots. My current lens is f5/6.3 and its horrible in low lighting
I recently took the 35-150 out to take photos of a 7-a-side soccer game, and the AF and IQ performance is top-notch even on my A7C, I would probably say the bottleneck is on the body/the Sony AF system/user-error themselves, since 150mm is a bit too short for this type of sport, my A7C couldn't pick up the eye most of the time. Also since Sony doesn't have an AF box on the body unlike some of the competitors, I'd have to resort to using zone or single point AF-C/Tracking, so there have been a few shots back-focused to the background. Other than that, I'm very impressed by this lens, it's sharp enough even cropping down to 300mm range.
That's great feedback.
How do you feel for the balance of the lens. Should it have had a tripod mount like many of the 70-200 has?
It's right on the edge. I think it is probably fine without, but not everyone will agree.
Thanks for the in-depth review of this lens. Initially, I was leaning towards buying the 28-200mm Tamron lens. Now I am seriously thinking of purchasing this lens instead. Is there a lens filter that could drastically reduce this lens flare?
I'm afraid not. Filters (if anything) add more chance of lens flare.
Hopefully, this won't sound as a bad question, but I was wondering your impression of this lens compared to the sony 24-105 OSS ? There is a little shift in zoom range, but there is sufficient overlap so that I wonder if the tamron would always be a better choice over that sony (not considering the price). From your review, it seems like the IQ, contrast, color rendition would be superior, not mentioning the possibilities of a faster lens. One caveat maybe is.. that I fear the zoom ring of the tamron is very stiff. I would appreciate your input :)
I would personally choose it over the Sony.
Amazing content
Thank you!
Kudos to Dustin: Once again excellent review.
Glad you enjoyed it
Interesting lens. Would you recommend on APS-C (a6600), it basically becomes 53-230 ?
It's pretty big for an APS-C camera, but that is an interesting focal range.
Hello from Kyiv Ukraine. I have been waiting for your opinion on this lens as I want to add this to my kit. I do not see this for me as a lens to replace others but a lens choice. I own 3 bodies and 16 lenses, 4 Tamron, 5 Samyang and 7 Sony. I like sometimes to travel around on my bicycle with a camera back pack, 1 body, filters, tripod and 3 to 4 lenses. Sometimes I will ride the metro into the city (quicker than in a car) and take a Think Tank mirrorless mover with me with 1 body and 2 lenses. This new Tamron lens means I have the choice to go into Kyiv with 1 lens or 2 if I need to go wider with the 17 to 28. This lens gives me options. I will definitely buy one. As for the tripod mount I am wondering if the one on my Tamron 150 to 500 would fit. Thanks for your excellent review once again.
I'm glad to help out.
Hi Dustin, I recently purchased this lens and I think it is absolutely fantastic. However I find it has a severe loss of AF-C tracking if in conjunction with zoom racking. It is a serious concern for me. I remember My original A9 with original firmware had a similar issue with the 70-200/2.8 when initially released (although not as bad). Did your copy have the same issue? I use it too with an A1 with latest firmware.
Hey,
Any update to that? I'm about to order one for my A7 IV.
What is your primary use? I suggest trying one at the store. If you use your camera primarily in AF-c and you intend to zoom in an out while focus tracking this lens may be very limiting. There might be a major physical limitation due to the combination of strong non parafocal characteristics and large aperture.
@@armandot9137 Well even if a local store had it, I wouldn't be able to take it for a proper test outside. I use my camera in AF-C 99% of the time. I'd use the 35-150 as a general photography lens since I have a 150-600 C for wildlife and a regular 50mm 1.8 prime. I'd probably get another 16mm prime to complement the rest. But I'd love to be able to do 90% of my photography with just the 35-150 and the big gun. There are these weekly symphony concerts I attend and have been shooting for the past few weeks which is why I'm looking for that 2.8 aperture as even at it I'm pushing up to 5000 ISO to get some shots.
I learned to work around the issue when i shoot sports. I would not use it for a critical action shot but otherwise it is usable, so I am quite sure it will be fine for your applications. Optically it is fabulous, but it flares easily keep that in mind too. That fact that I still use it for sports despite this issue speaks volumes on how much I like it. In fact my frustration derives from loving it so much yet being unable to to rely on it for critical work in sports
Note that the issue is quite obvious, rack zoom fast as you are tracking a number of times at the store. If the result does not bother you you are good to go
Thanks for the review. What do you think about comparisons with Sony 24-105 f/4? I’m thinking about selling my and get Tamron
That's a move that I personally would definitely make. The Tamron is in a whole other level of performance.
Great Video! Could you also compare this lens with Sigma 24-70 f2.8 please?
hi Albert - I'm afraid I don't have the Sigma on hand for a comparison.
Hey there, great review! Would you recommend that over the 24-105 f4 for general use?
For image quality, definitely. This is a next level lens.
@@DustinAbbottTWI the 24-105 is widely considered to have prime lens image quality so for you to say this has better IQ that’s says a lot.
I am wondering, is this lens going to replace the Sony 135 (or good enough to not use the 135 nearly as often) or perhaps avoid you purchasing the Sony 35 1.4. In other words, does this lens largely minimize/eliminate consideration of the 135 and/or 35?
At the moment I own the GM 35mm and 135mm, and I have no plans to sell them. I'll use the Tamron more for events and use the primes when I have time to be more artistic.
@DustinAbbottTWI what is the name of the table tripod you are using? Thanks
It's from Oben - I have a little review here: bit.ly/CTT1000
This is on the wishlist for my live music and event gigs, in that case I'd take the Sigma 16mm f1.4 for the APS-C and this lens, I'm set. Saving up…
I love it as an event lens. So many framing options.
Hi Dustin,
I think you said that this was a great lens for event shooters in another review of this lens, and I agree. The problem with the Holy Trinity is that it is made of 3 lenses, but most event photographers only carry 2 camera bodies. An Event Photographer could carry this lens on a camera body and the Super Wide Zoom on the other camera body. So, in this case they could leave the 24-70 f/2.8 & the 70-200 f/2.8 in their camera bag.
Thanks for your time.
Mathew
Exactly. That makes this lens extremely useful.
Great and detailed review, very precise and spot on, unlike one of the early review that bashed the AF tracking using A7R4, which nearly convinced me to cancelled my preorder but luckily didnt.
As one of the first batch owners of the lens, I extremely agree that this truly is a fantastic lens, the AF is surprising quick (even in challenging dark environments, and pet eye AF works great), very sharp thoroughout the range at f2.8, pleasing colours and rendering (wouldn't feel I'm missing too much resolution compared to my GM primes except the clipping of corner bokeh balls), the range and bright aperture is extremely versatile and definitely lives up to its price and expectations. Would be perfect if its Made in Japan like the G2, higher quality plastics like Sony GM lenses and a sealed back element.
Have you had any dust issues with Tamron's exposed back element design (having no glass at the mount end)? A bit worried that there would be excessive dust gathering inside the lens.
Here is the thing, Sony is under threat left right and center from its mount partners. Apart from newest GM primes and 70-200II, there is little reason to choose Sony lenses over third party offerings. Is it a bad thing for Sony? Look at what they have done to auto focus breathing correction on A7IV.
@@frankluo230 I would disagree, the 14GM, 20G, 35GM, 50GM, 135GM are all fantastic and unmatched by third party offerings or even Canon/Nikon. Focus breathing issues are just overly exaggerated but youtubers.
Really don't see them too concerned with their mount partners (the budget market), if you look at their lens releases these couple of years, they're pretty much focused on completing or updating their GM collection to compete against Canon/Nikon, which is where the real threats are.
@@kanaheiusagi Add the 24mm GM to that list its the best 24mm I ever have had
I haven't personally had a problem, but neither do I shoot in a terribly dusty environment.
Agree, I got dust in my 28-75 rear elements. However, I managed to disassemble and clean it up:)
I like the focal range of this lens the most. But I would have happily trade off the f2 start point with the common f2.8 if it could've made it equal to the 70-180 in size and weight. But I get that fast aperture is one of the selling point for this lens. So I just can hope Tamron brings out a 2.8-4 version like it's DSLR one but with the optics of this new one and way lighter!
Fair enough, though, as you say, that aperture is probably the most unique feature here.
Thanks Dustin. Can you tell me model name tripod in video.
Oben Tabletop Tripod shown in video: bhpho.to/3vL8YWy
That was a great review! I would like to ask you which one should i buy? Tamron 36-150 f/2 - 2,8 or should i pick sigma 24-70 f/2,8 ? Both are great lenses i know that but it's also both too expensive. With tamron i take advantage the low range of 35 and also the beast range of 150 but with sigma i have something more standard with 24 to 70 where i cover the low range of 24. I want it for travelling.I have the Sony A7 II. Thank you!
I LOVE the Tamron 35-150mm. It's my "if I could only have one lens" lens. I'll always recommend it.
Nice video. Do you think the the Tamron 35-150mm F2-2.8 is better than the Tamron 28-200mm as a travel lens or all in one lens?
Optically, yes. It's obviously more limited in zoom range and is much larger and heavier, so it depends on what your priorities are.
Thank you so much for your excellent review, Dustin!
Question: How would you compare it to the Tamron 28-200, although it is a different category? Is it worth the extra weight and price?
As an owner of both, the 35-150 is definitely worth the weight and price. The 28-200 has too much compromises and really is in a different league (like the difference between a kit lens and a pro grade f2.8 zoom), the 35-150 is way sharper, have smoother bokeh, better rendering and contrast, much brighter aperture, faster and more accurate AF and more utility switches/buttons.
I have the 28 200, it is very versatile but just nowhere near as good as my 16 35gm, no surprises there but I'm always disappointed when I zoom in on the pc ... Hope this lens is better
I skipped 28-200 because of af performance. Nobody said it was great
@@samtaylor4592 The 28-200 is a good "kit" lens for its price/range/aperture (relatively fast compared to kit lenses), IQ just isn't part of it, even the 17-28 is better.
@@samtaylor4592 I agree. The 28-200 is so versatile and lightweight, so it’s my go-to, but I’m also always disappointed when I zoom in on the image.
very intriguing lens, would be super useful for low light events/ even as a travel lens (although a bit hefty)
will be interested to see if sony will attempt to make something similar and smaller
I think going smaller would be very difficult using current technology.
As a wedding photographer
Do you think that tamron is better than the tamron 28-75 g2? Sharper?
Or you prefer to have tamron 28-75 and sony 85mm 1.8?
As a wedding photographer I would prefer this lens. You can get so many of your shots with just one lens.
@@DustinAbbottTWI thanks
Nice lens. I just wish these lens makers would make the zooming internal like in the 18-105. I hate the zoom extending the length of the lens, it is cumbersome and can be difficult to use when pointing camera towards the sky. It was the main reason of getting rid of the 70-300 and opting for the 70-200 and the incredible 200-600 zoom, both with internal zooming. So much superior to the other method.
I like internally zooming lenses too, though that would have resulted in a very large lens.