Montana: Confident In Any Fight
Vložit
- čas přidán 15. 03. 2022
- Second Channel for full games and Stream Highlights: / @pqlive228
Watch me live on Twitch: / potatoquality_
If you want to know how I mod my game to look the way it does here is a video: • A Video on the Mods I ...
Keep in mind I may be using different mods to the ones in this video. The primary reason I made this video is to show how to get mods for your game, and it's up to you to find the ones you want.
I'm PQ. Hopefully, on this channel, I can teach you a bit about how I play the game. Thanks for watching.
WoWs NA Invite: warships.us/Potato_Quality
WoWs RU Invite: flot.ru/Potato_Quality
Business inquiries only: potatoquality.business@gmail.com
Carry, Pushing, How To Win, How To Carry, Pro, Unicum, Tutorial, Guide, World of Warships, Fun, Funny, Captain Skills, Changes, Build, Setup, Montana, American, Battleship, OP, BB, Ohio, Brawl, Secondaries, Kraken, - Hry
Thanks for the kind words!! It was alot of work to keep your push at bay, I had to switch sides at the start of the game to stop a complete lemmingtrain. Big props to my team-mates that didn't abandon their flank. Let me know if you'd like to see my side of the battle.
Post it bro
So you can just link over from this comment
@@quangduongang6230 you can upload files directly? Or do I hafta cloud it?
@@freelancerinc1162 i meant that you can just record the replay and upload it to CZcams since, i mean we're here already.
But now that I think about it, you probably just wanted to send the replay files eh?
Wow you are here!
@@p4n4143 a clanmate posted the video in our discord :)
I love my monty. In the beginning i died a lot with this ship, i was too eager to get damage with those guns so i pushed a little too far. But now, oof. Every 2nd mach i get a dev strike on a cruiser foolish enough too give broadside. Last night got a 200k game with 2 dev strikes. Absolute beast
Thanks for uploading this it's really nice to see Both teams playing decently well and not just having the game decided by the five minute mark.
If I hadn't switched sides to stop a lemmingtrain it could have been
This is like two heros in a film meeting in the middle of the battle at the end :-)!
I only recently started playing this game and your videos have been really helpful. I'm currently only on the Colorado sadly :(
Sometimes you surprise with really poetic video titles. :) I likes this one
US BB Montana line is the best starting line as it forces you to learn all of the basics of BB play without the gimmicks getting into the way of those basics.
Potato, your material is right up there with the best. You're a great player without the bro condescending attitude. You choose really entertaining replays and I enjoy your commentary. Keep it up, dude.
Fire and superstructure could be capped at 75% of a BB HP. The last 25% would be done only by full pens, citadels and torpedoes.
a kremlin would never be able to be killed.
Maybe not all out remove damage after 25% but reduce the damage by like 75-80% once the super structure has saturated. Heals should not unsaturate either cus that completely defeats the point of that.
As you mentioned in the video, consistency is Montanta's biggest strength. I still love playing Ohio but I still tend to get higher damage games in Montana just for the shear shell volume versus Ohio.
Monty was my first t10 and I still love it.
You said maybe you would suggest a different line to go down first? Which BB line(s) would you recommend to go down?
PQ, what's your thoughts about the leg mod for Monty? Is it good in randoms, or is it a CB/ranked only kind of thing?
Best beginner bb imo, teachs you the basic without any gimmics. Now grinding toward italian bb. A bit painfull to grind tbh, lack of range and accuracy, but the fastest grind i ever do in any bb lines because the sap and sheer number of shells they can throws lol
That double Kraken on each other was cute
Why did the "ggood, Bad, and Ugly" riff go thru my mind when the show down started.
My friend is a good BB/CA player and decided to get Incomparable as his first steel ship. Doing 115k in his first 50 games 42%WR. And he hates it. Finds it too stressful to play. Yet he is amazing in his Alaska. Any hints you can provide to make this ship work and carry better?
Use range mod, play at mid-range and build for AA in case of CV games as CV spotting really hurts it. Try to stay angled at about 25 degrees against incoming fire; it's an amazing kiting ship. Don't be aggressive until late game, which is when hard pushing works.
The biggest common denominator for close matches IS standard battle! At least that has been clearly true for me.
Im confused, why does his port have a premium [Montana] in it if hes using a non premium Montana? is that like some event reward ship with different stats or does it just carry the increased credit income boost that premiums tend to have?
Nah if a ship has [ ] like that its for clan battles. Its not a "premium"
I'm surprised a carrier could bounce battleship grade AP and HE!
kind of wish you showed the players at the beginning of every match to see if I was in it.
I just got all my equipment on my Montana and it's a good ship, not too good and not horrible, just right, but, I prefer the GK any day
Hey PQ! I have a question regarding the game. Why is it that ships that have been for over five years in the game haven't been powercrept yet? Yamato, Montana, Des Moines, Hindenburg etc... all still perform very well if not better than some of their newer counterparts. Is there something in their design philosophy that makes them resistant to the changing meta?
Yamato: 460mm overmatch, long-range tankiness (especially with better than average thickness and little super structure, resonates with camping meta). Solid accuracy, the vertical dispersion is slightly finicky.
Montana: slightly powercrept, still comes out on top with broadside dmg consistency, just behind Conqueror in tankiness, decent heal. Ohio is generally better, but feels inaccurate with 4 less guns.
Des Moines: Radar (outright good), sheer dpm in both AP and HE. Overmatchable armor, mitigated by shell arcs (island camping) and maneuverability. Decent AA, still not enough though.
And well it just comes down to their core design not being entirely put down by other ships. For example, every ship with 457 or more either plays differently than Yammy, has similar performance, or is just worse.
Vermont takes away too much in maneuverability, reload and tankiness (designed purely for guns). Kremlin has shotgun accuracy, meant to play at closer ranges. Incomparable is designed as a flanking ship with barely any tankiness, countless gimmicks, especially concealment, torps, engine boost. Thunderer is a potential competitor, lacks a bit in tankiness though. Ohio is designed like a more flexible Montana. Preussen has questionable dispersion, better suited with tank build/sec build anyway. Shiki is just Yamato with better secondary and AA, but shit gun count with the same dispersion, sometimes making it frustrating to hit shots (Satsuma is a supership, so no comparison).
Those ships used to be monsters back then, (with the buffs) so it takes a while to power creep them. However I do believe Yamato has been powercreep a bit by just an mp4 file of deadly gun sounds slapped into a the same hull with less guns but more damage.
Everything else is still powerful but carriers make them impossible to play
@@droidmotorola3884 Shiki isn't that much of a powercreep. With the same bollocks vertical dispersion as Yammy if I'm not wrong, along with 6 guns and shorter reload, it pretty much does the same dmg with Yammy. 20" overcomes no important armor penetration threshold, except a very tiny, tiny bit few cruiser plates that who really cares. Just shoot super structure anyway or just any 32mm bow and it would do the same, if not better.
@@gangutbayern246 well the mayor thing is shiki has AA, but is not really just shiki am talking about. See shikishima also got powercrept by both incomparable and the T 11 shikishima that’s coming out.
What I want to say is, wg promised we would never get a gun caliber higher than Yamato. And now look. Even Germany get larger guns than Yamato.
@@droidmotorola3884 Incomparabe plays differently my guy. It has abysmal armor, but has countless gimmicks to help it thrive in flanking. A 1-on-1, Incomp will have the upper hand at closer ranges because torps and speed, but this gets useless as it gets further. Shiki performs as a better kiter.
And Satsuma is a super ship. Yes, there is up-tiering, but for the sake of fairness, we should compare with only other T10 ships.
Caliber doesn't entirely define a ship. You have, for example, Preussen and Thunderer. Both 18" in 4 twin configuration. Although, a Preussen will sink just about anything without torps at close-range regardless, but Thunderer will definitely outperform Preussen at long-mid ranges. Preussen will definitely take dmg, but Thundy will definitely die 2 times over.
Heck, compare Schlieffen who has 16.5" guns. It will definitely win any brawl because it's *designed differently*.
But good point, I think Yammy/Shiki are becoming powercrept nonetheless. Not significantly though, I still can play my Yammy like it is.
Wait, so if your BB doesn't have overmatch at whatever tier let's just say 7 and up, you pretty much mostly shoot at super structures..?
Either wait for broadside or shoot superstructure, yes.
@Gangut Bayern I really need to learn more haha, I feel like I barely ever get decent damage most of the time, then all of a sudden, I'm hitting citadels galore
@@TheVersacePython You'll get used to it ;>
There are a lot of factors to citadelling. Cruisers vary the most in tankiness. Some have "overmatch"-able armor, mostly the Americans and the British. This means that a decent amount of Battleship calibers at their tier are large enough to penetrate through the hull regardless of angle. Some examples are, Minotaur, Pensacola, Seattle. Although, some ships have such a thin armor that battleships overpen their hull on a full broadside, Myoko, Atlanta, and some Light Cruisers (If they angle enough, press the nuke button. Same goes if they're far enough, since shells pen at a steeper angle and catches more citadel).
Another is citadel placement. Some have janky citadels with arbitrary points jutting out, like Yamato with the hexagonal citadel, bad for close-range and British cruiser hulls with elevated citadel parts amidships. Different ships have different citadel levels too, some sitting above or below waterline.
Finally, armor gimmicks. It is a miracle to citadel a GKürfurst/Preussen because of their turtleback armor. It works best at mid-closer ranges, it's not like you can hit a citadel at 22km easily though (you can just farm their superstructure anyway). Spaced armor, like on the Henri IV. Called by the community, blackhole armor, there is a second plate behind the outer plate that's angled differently. This means that whatever shell that pens through the first plate must be checked by the second plate if it is not too angled to ricochet.
There are more minor factors, but these are the main things to keep track of.
Maaaan, I was expecting you to get 10 ship kills. Work on that would ya? :)
You would think WG would give you a award like some coin or a flag for such achievements.
Very good to remind people they took this away.
"there needs to be someone on the enemy team doing work aswell". this.
I really do feel a lot of the blow outs come down to the matchmaker.
even if avarage winrates are roughly even, say +/- 3%. When i see a game, where our team has maybe 1purple(60+), 3 light blue (55+) and 2 green (52+) while the enemy team has only like 1 blue and 2 green, i already know i have to play super aggro to even get damage, because its gonna be a blowout.
Like i understand if a super unicum division queues up, it might be hard for the matchmaker to balance this.
But 90% of the time thats not the case.
90% of the time the matchmaker could have just switched say a 55%BB from one side with a 49% BB on the other side and the "good" players would have been more fairly split. Wich should not be any kind of problem in terms of coding.
I think everyone forgets about the Montana's most powerful gimmick, Its looks! You cannot convince me that the Montana is not the most beautiful ship at tier ten. GK has weird looking turrets, Kremlin, like everything from Eastern Europe, is grey and concrete, Yamato is just guns and nothing on the deck, Republique has a weird fat center bulge, and Conqueror is boxy like a Minecraft ship.
Hah, well said. Incomparable is best looking T10 BB ;) but Montana is classy too.
@@waverleyjournalise5757 No shot thats true. looks like a long thin cruiser with comically large turrets
@@qmaximus5207 each to their own ;)
Could not agree with you more. Montana is still my favourite looking BB in this game. It also the most realistic looking paper ship imo. It felt like it actually exist irl
Reported for misleading thumbnail 🤣
the monty use to be a top tier bb when I started playing. when I quit playing though it was more of a mid to lower tier bb. now you have cruisers with a bigger health pool, ships with bigger guns, ships with better armor, ships that have more accuracy, and ships with faster reloads. It wouldn't take much to make the monty a top tier ship again but it's been power crept pretty hard.
Clearly everyone has their own opinion, but I definitely don’t think the Montana is in a bad spot at all. Some newer ships have funky gimmicks but nothing beats realiable guns at all ranges.
Ships that get shorter reload get less guns or lower calibre. Bigger guns are often longer reload and/or less accurate.
Cruisers with higher HP would only be Battlecruisers and as such they have much much worse healing that Monty.
Monty's a great ship - guns hit hard, really acurate, good armour only thing she lacks is overmatch but other than that she's great. I actually disagree with PQ i think she'd be a great first Tier X bb, because of the lack of gimicks.
@@tomriley5790 I think as a first BB she would be awesome. Having reliable guns is more important than all the gimmicks in the game combined.
Montana is good for new players that want to explore islands and find new continents :)
@@agroplode9680 You thinking about another tier 10 BB perhaps?
Monty is just a good ship she in my opinion doesn't lack much compared to other ships she is solid
Montana is so... predictable. Possibly the best match of endurance and accuracy in the game, and one of the ships that's aged so well it's always relevant.
Do you ever commend other players? 3:
starlink is potato quality lol.
Close? Seriously?