I would also like to add that the existence and circulation of such myths basically means that many men are less trusting of women they would have otherwise trusted. The actual origins of this came from 1960's and 1970's Feminist activist researchers promoting "love positive" (to call it that) hypotheses. Namely, the idea that conceived ovulation specifically evolved to confuse paternity. This idea was pushed to sell the idea that "patriarchy is unnatural, matriarchy is natural" and that paternity assurance is a patriarchal construct. During the 1980's these ideas were adopted by PUA's and in the 1990's it became the "Alpha fawkes, Beta bux" we all know. This idea is basically designed to make men distrust women and while Feminists today will claim that the idea is "misogynistic" it's undeniable that it was promoted as "female empowerment" not too long ago. Men and boys listening to these podcasts will hear this idea and might never be able to trust a female ever in their lives simply because this idea will always be in the back of their head. Imagine someone with trust issues always having the thought "it is female nature to cheat" always in their head whenever they are with a partner. We can already see the same effect with women believing "all men will cheat whenever they can". What's worse is trying to interact within these communities, any evidence that doesn't portray women as extremely oppurtunistic and misandric is seen as "cope". I've been in the Men's Rights Movement for decades and language was this was literally never seen, but since Isla Vista I noticed the rise of these "red pill" groups that are unironically the way that the media has potrayed us. Another important question is why these ideas hold such currency in the "marketplace of ideas", after multiple generations of men and boys being told that we are "obsolete", "not needed", and "not the future" this seems like a "mask off" moment, despite only a very tiny minority of a mostly activist group of people spreading this idea through the cultural production process and most of society enabling their hatred. While the "Manosphere" isn't "reactionary", a lot of these myths are reactive in that they basically react to the myths and misandric ideas spread by the pro-female side to the point that the pro-male side is largely a reaction. No different to what Feminists perceive to be "the patriarchy" and their reactions to it, if they believe that "the patriarchy" portrays all women as chaste they create this charicature of a promiscuous woman and parade it around as "the liberated woman" (liberated from "the patriarchy") and then the PUA's claim that this is true female nature and use it to mock them.
czcams.com/video/DPWuFAPPrIA/video.html - NO ONE IS F*CKING SAYING THAT. Like every other "politicaly correct relationship expert" Alex is making a straw man.
The entire redpill revolves around the idea that there are two types of men, alpha and beta and that women have a dual mating strategy, so they go for the alphas in their youth and go for the betas when they are older. Don't know where the straw man is.
Oh, I see. Dude, a lot of guys put there are saying that lmao That's hypergamy in the manosphere, going "up" and leaving your current partner for someone better. Go to any incel forum, they are all like "Even if you ascend, she still will seek Chad".
But it does happen 30% of men are raising another man's child unknowingly. If it wasn't a thing i wouldn't have a list of women i had smashed that was either in a relationship or married. Most of the time you dk they are in a relationship till after you smash but by then it's to late.
30% of TESTED paternity in some countries is a negative match. Note that most men don't take paternity tests so there's already some degree of suspicion and even in those cases 70% of paternity tests seem to prove that the men who suspected that the child wasn't theirs are the biological father. Because of years on consuming this type of content I got so paranoid about my paternity that my sister gave me a paternity test as a birthday gift and all my kids turned out to be mine. Even though I'm the poster child of "bad genes", logically, no woman would ever want to reproduce with me but "my children" turned out to be mine.
this implies women are forward thinking adults (verifiably false)
Is there a reason Spotify gets 10 minute previews and CZcams 5 min?
You'll accept your 5mins and you'll like it!
I would also like to add that the existence and circulation of such myths basically means that many men are less trusting of women they would have otherwise trusted. The actual origins of this came from 1960's and 1970's Feminist activist researchers promoting "love positive" (to call it that) hypotheses. Namely, the idea that conceived ovulation specifically evolved to confuse paternity. This idea was pushed to sell the idea that "patriarchy is unnatural, matriarchy is natural" and that paternity assurance is a patriarchal construct.
During the 1980's these ideas were adopted by PUA's and in the 1990's it became the "Alpha fawkes, Beta bux" we all know.
This idea is basically designed to make men distrust women and while Feminists today will claim that the idea is "misogynistic" it's undeniable that it was promoted as "female empowerment" not too long ago. Men and boys listening to these podcasts will hear this idea and might never be able to trust a female ever in their lives simply because this idea will always be in the back of their head. Imagine someone with trust issues always having the thought "it is female nature to cheat" always in their head whenever they are with a partner. We can already see the same effect with women believing "all men will cheat whenever they can".
What's worse is trying to interact within these communities, any evidence that doesn't portray women as extremely oppurtunistic and misandric is seen as "cope". I've been in the Men's Rights Movement for decades and language was this was literally never seen, but since Isla Vista I noticed the rise of these "red pill" groups that are unironically the way that the media has potrayed us. Another important question is why these ideas hold such currency in the "marketplace of ideas", after multiple generations of men and boys being told that we are "obsolete", "not needed", and "not the future" this seems like a "mask off" moment, despite only a very tiny minority of a mostly activist group of people spreading this idea through the cultural production process and most of society enabling their hatred.
While the "Manosphere" isn't "reactionary", a lot of these myths are reactive in that they basically react to the myths and misandric ideas spread by the pro-female side to the point that the pro-male side is largely a reaction. No different to what Feminists perceive to be "the patriarchy" and their reactions to it, if they believe that "the patriarchy" portrays all women as chaste they create this charicature of a promiscuous woman and parade it around as "the liberated woman" (liberated from "the patriarchy") and then the PUA's claim that this is true female nature and use it to mock them.
Summary "Everything is women's fault, no accountability for men"
He is delving into the terribly named 'Sexy Son Hypothesis'. Dawkins briefly touched on this in his book The Selfish Gene.
selfish gene is an iconic but overhauled book
czcams.com/video/DPWuFAPPrIA/video.html - NO ONE IS F*CKING SAYING THAT.
Like every other "politicaly correct relationship expert" Alex is making a straw man.
The entire redpill revolves around the idea that there are two types of men, alpha and beta and that women have a dual mating strategy, so they go for the alphas in their youth and go for the betas when they are older.
Don't know where the straw man is.
Oh, I see.
Dude, a lot of guys put there are saying that lmao
That's hypergamy in the manosphere, going "up" and leaving your current partner for someone better.
Go to any incel forum, they are all like "Even if you ascend, she still will seek Chad".
But it does happen 30% of men are raising another man's child unknowingly. If it wasn't a thing i wouldn't have a list of women i had smashed that was either in a relationship or married. Most of the time you dk they are in a relationship till after you smash but by then it's to late.
No, its something between 1-3% od child
why bother hiding the fact that it's not his child
when in 2024 a lot of men are willing to raise another man's child willingly??? LOL
30% of TESTED paternity in some countries is a negative match. Note that most men don't take paternity tests so there's already some degree of suspicion and even in those cases 70% of paternity tests seem to prove that the men who suspected that the child wasn't theirs are the biological father. Because of years on consuming this type of content I got so paranoid about my paternity that my sister gave me a paternity test as a birthday gift and all my kids turned out to be mine. Even though I'm the poster child of "bad genes", logically, no woman would ever want to reproduce with me but "my children" turned out to be mine.
Historically is like a 7% figure, cuckoldry is not that common. Stop deluding yourself