Jordan Peterson: Avoid out of control w.o.m.e.n.?
Vložit
- čas přidán 31. 05. 2018
- Jordan Peterson talks about the difficulty men have of dealing with completely out of control individuals of the opposite sex etc. ORDER Peterson's NEW book & audiobook Beyond Order: 12 More Rules for life amzn.to/33uho7H Australians click here for Beyond Order: amzn.to/3qfSxOI
The Rise of Jordan Peterson MOVIE
amzn.to/3kq1KDF
Essential Truth is an official affiliate of Jordan Peterson's Discovering Personality course. To sign up, click here: courses.jordanbpeterson.com/a...
The Art of Manliness book: amzn.to/33vzxBQ
Peterson's 12 Rules for Life audiobook: amzn.to/3lxt7bX Australians click here for 12 Rules for Life: amzn.to/37qVymA
Survival kit: amzn.to/3fQ6BK3
Peterson's audiobook: Maps of Meaning amzn.to/36osqgv
Jordan Peterson hoodie: amzn.to/3kt6FzW
Jordan Peterson "Clean Your Room" mug: amzn.to/33vUWLA
Jordan Peterson maxims mug: amzn.to/33vUWLA
Jordan Peterson "Clean Your Room" t-shirt: amzn.to/39BO7LY
The Parasitic Mind (Gad Saad) audiobook: amzn.to/3lkrZYN
Douglas Murray's The Madness of Crowds: amzn.to/2KVpVKs
Dave Rubin's Don't Burn This Book audiobook: amzn.to/37idjoa
Other relevant links:
Personality analysis: www.understandmyself.com/
Cutting-edge personality analysis: innershift.com/
Self Authoring: selfauthoring.com/
Jordan Peterson Website: jordanbpeterson.com/
Jordan Peterson's Podcast: jordanbpeterson.com/jordan-b-p...
Reading List: jordanbpeterson.com/2017/03/gr...
Jordan Peterson's Twitter: / jordanbpeterson
We are participants in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliate sites.
FAIR USE NOTICE: The use of media materials featured on this channel is protected by the Fair Use Clause of the U.S. Copyright Act of 1976, which allows for the rebroadcast of copyrighted materials for the purposes of commentary, criticism, and education. If any copyright owner believes that a specific upload does not meet the criteria for fair use, please contact us via direct message to request removal.
Ironically enough her attitude is proving his point
she doesn't even recognize the subtle aggression she's direct at him as she speaks/
Facts
Her little passive aggressive sigh when he says he keeps his temper down is a perfect example.
I was going to say the same thing. What a cow
She is annoying and is not worth being an interviewer 🤦🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️
Her total unawareness of her being like the woman he’s describing is hilarious 😂
Psychological Warfare czcams.com/video/8mvEnnHAa4Y/video.html ?fh43
Oh no
I think she's quite aware of it
@@jameshammond3853 yes, she is aware, but not really conscious about that.
Shes a journalist man. It's her job to ask uncomfortable questions.
@@TheDumbel38 yes. But avoiding actual answers does not seem like a proper journalist job.
She absolutely proves Jordan's point!! She is one of those women.
Her mum never told her that it is rude to interrupt...
She's trying to get to the core of Peterson's beliefs... she's not a woman out of control.
She is horrible I wish she would shut up and let him talk
Because she does not agree with you?
It may be because as the interviewer she is trying to create a debate to allow Peterson to express himself to those whom may disagree with him. It doesn't necessarily mean that she believes in the stance she is taking as the interviewer. You can assess that when she says, "Good answer" through her mouth movements without saying it out loud. So I got the impression that she may agree with him to some extent.
Damn, his patience is 💯 just like her ignorance
hahaha
"I'M NOT INTERESTED IN THE CLINICAL LITERATURE"
Well that there, could be the problem lady!
shizzlepie What a stupid thing to say..she may as well have said “Facts don’t interest me, only biased opinions (of mine)”.
That part honestly made me laugh because what he said really wasn't that bad or untrue. She was like "I don't care if there's science behind it, I don't like it so it's not true"
She said shes not interviewing the clinical literature.
Bryant Wood It’s still just another way for her to try to avoid what’s inconvenient to her. Piss poor.
She said interviewing, not interested. Still is an annoying thing to walk over peterson's citation like that.
She proved his point personally and didn't even realize it I bet.
Ability to agree to disagree is really a prerequisite to any discussion of merit. She only paid any attention or credence when she herself was speaking, nothing more.
Interviewer tried to trip Dr Peterson a few times and in my opinion failed spectacularly.
Its natural... women are all like tgat
Green Gunner 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
Spot on. I was going to say it but beat me to it. "Ohh really, why do women need to be controlled?" Literally never what he had said.
"I don't care about the literature, I don't care about the scientific data, I only care about your opinion so that I can berate you for having one!"
You said it perfectly. She's in attack mode from the get go.
He didn't answer her questions. She asked questions. She didn't "attack" him.
Her job is to ask questions and he failed to answer them.
@@kdphotos4691 tone and body language say alot
@@rebeccabriggs2982 - yes, Peterson lost it. That is clear. I had to turn the volume down when he started shouting. He still didn't answer her question, no matter how much manipulation through body language he used. He wasn't going to answer it either, hence the reason why she had to ask it more than once.
Peterson would make a great politician and the naive and gullible would eat his manipulations up.
@@kdphotos4691 he's a very intelligent man who presents many well thought out ideas. He educates himself on an ongoing basis. I don't know what your problem is and to be frank... I don't want to know.
She’s completely unaware that she’s is one of the types of woman he is describing. Which is part of the problem. They rarely ever discover they are like this.
Interviewing someone is being "out of control?" Really?
"They?" Who is "they?" You are typical of men who don't even see they are like this...
They think that that is being a free woman(like her). Behaving like ..I m not gonna be suppressed by you men!! When there is nothing of suppression then just a open free talk. They feel attacked by whatever a men will say. By EVERYTHING a men says they will feel attacked.
100
That's narcissism 101 right there.
They fucking know
I'm 23 seconds in...struggling . He has the patience of a saint.
I hear you.
Although he admitted there would be insurmountable logistical problems with actually trying to do it, my father always wanted to keep a fresh cow pie handy to throw at people who annoyed him. I think this video is one of those situations. That woman isn't trying to have a civil discussion, she's deliberately trying to provoke Peterson into losing his temper.
Me too! I almost left but I like how he just mows people like her down with FACTS. They're so disrespectful to him every time and he's cool as the other side of the pillow!
@@Free-bt6gn If she doesn't respect him when he stating facts, then she doesn't respect the facts.
@Rickie j Didn't say he was a saint .
His patience is out of this world!
Right......
He was a hindu cow in a previous life😁
It’s his intelligence that keeps him indifferent to other ppls emotion. He deals in facts no emotion.
@@drayshawnc10 well, psychopats have no emotions, too.
he is not patient, he is educated :)
She does an excellent job of proving his case.
😂😂😂
I dont get why people are hating her. If anything, she is the best person to do this interview. /s
That's the good thing about women on British media... They're effective at clarifying interviewees' ideas by acting against them
I think she is happy with that label! As am I.. I have an IQ in the top 0.1% of the population and men will walk up and talk down to me, in the fruitless hope that I'll think they are worth breeding with.. Sorry, mate, not even close..
She literally proved his point by attacking him verbally.
"Why do women HAVE TO be aggressive?", while she's being aggressive.
EXACTLY what I was thinking!!!
@@uselesshero.official she's not saying that they shouldnt be but why are they
She's being assertive, not aggressive. There's a difference, cluck.
The interviewer was just plain rude.
No, she's definitely being "aggressively assertive". I personally think she's taking his assertions personally. Maybe not to herself personally, but definitely her beliefs.
He is listening to everything she is saying, she only hears what she wants.
People do that to me all the time. They can't comprehend that I can hear them, think and form a counter argument at the same time. Because I have already heard what they have to say hundreds of times before.
Sir Phantasmic Well said.
Typical woman ..... 😉
Jordan "Clean your room, before you complain about the world" Peterson... 3 months after his burnout. Ironic, is it?
If you guys really would respect his message, you should stop listening to him ;)
Shooting Tsars Wow..that’s quite a simplified take on the situation, for such a complex condition. You’re a fucking moron. Stick to subjects you have half a chance of understanding..which would be NIL.
This woman is so totally unaware of her own ignorance, I’m embarrassed for her.
She’s a woman so she’s always right.
I don't agree. She's right, not very liberal of him.
She isn't listening, she maintains eye contact only when she's asking questions.
Exactly
+ it's visible that Jordan dislikes the whole situation (which is understandable); he is listeninig carefully but not looking at her in the end of the vid
A lot of people don't make eye contact when they're LISTENING to others. One listens with their ears...
@K Herve No, she's not listening. She's a poor man's Cathy Newman. And what is she doing with that bloody pen ?! Sadly, it's going to take more than a pen and a posh accent to make you look intelligent, Anne.
Slight correction...she on maintains eye contact when she is preparing her next snarky (and wrongheaded) argument.
@@mofa9745 For real, throughout the whole (long duration) interview she pretended to be making notes with her pen but when you look at it she never actually wrote anything down. She is only pretending to be listening. But then again maybe the style of her show does not afford her to take in ideas, her ideas have to be ready on the go.
“Why do women have to be aggressive”
She says in a very demeaning and aggressive tone.
A sick woman and yet she is a broadcaster! How appropriate! 😓
99% of women just know this, but yet she is pretending it doesn't exist.
Most women I know say they hate other women
you mean 100%?
What doesn't exist?
🤣🤣🤣
She's pretending it doesn't exist by acting it out 🤪
I'm 30 seconds in, this woman is crazy. "What is this creature" oh wake up earlier Karen.
The way jordan handled this was amazing, how do you keep so calm when talking with someone who acts like this... much respect.
Ah yes, the ol' "women are crazy" trope. She is an interviewer doing her job. Change the sexes and you will see that it is you who is acting up, not an interviewer you dislike because she does not fit your beliefs on how a woman "should" behave. She isn't crazy.
You also used another misogynist trope: calling women "Karen" for asking questions or using their voices at all.
"Creature?" Reverse the sexes and you will see that you are repeating misogynist propaganda. You have dehumanised her because again, she isn't playing into your agenda. If she were a man and he were a woman, you would be saying "the interviewer really was calm, speaking to such a crazy creature." Alas, there are no man-hating derogatory words which I can insert there to help you see it logically.
The fact that yet ANOTHER word has been created to insult women for doing the SAME THINGS as men does speak volumes.
Peterson has an agenda. If he didn't, he'd be able to answer her questions. He cannot give examples of "women being out of control."
The benchmark for being out of control would be gang rape, which is a male crime inflicted upon others. You don't see women *organising* themselves to commit senseless crimes which ruin and destroy lives. You don't see women *creating* wars with the incapability to think for themselves and ask "why take orders from men who thrive on death and destruction." Women get dragged into the male created system of wars, and they are usually victimised. When they aren't victimised, their accomplishments are minimised, hence how men gaslight women into "knowing their place."'
Perhaps you could answer FOR him. How are women "out of control?" Indeed, even the act of that particular woman doing her job in that video has you accusing her of being "crazy" and calling her a racist (not sure why you would use the slur "Karen" when they weren't talking about race at all).
If he can't handle questions during an interview, then he needs to keep his trap shut.
Again, a very insightful answer that peels back layers of accepted norms of human behavior. The notion that women are innately gossipers and that gossip is damaging and used to hurt others is completely short-sighted. When men and women of all ages come together, the most popular topic of conversation is talking about other ppl. Talking about others in a subjective manner is by definition, gossip. Men and women who are idea ppl and gravitate towards philosophy, literature, practical technical conversations, "gearheads", study scripture, or generally focus on intangible ideas are admired/respected, but don't have a lot of friends. Provincial thinking and communicating makes men and women likable and relatable. Can gossip be malicious and damaging? Yes. To claim this is the domain of women is utterly laughable and unremarkable. I know what an out of control and vicous woman can look like and behave and I don't have any of his credentials. He presents an argument that because women are naturally gossipers (gossip= deviant behavior/slander), they can never be truly trusted. He undermines so many previous compelling lectures he gave about the power of commitment, love, relationships, and giving yourself wholeheartedly to the man or woman you chose to have a life with.
@@plznotnoworever1878 I don't disagree with much of what you're saying really, but there were some things that I genuinely didn't catch in the interview. He didn't say that gossip by it's nature is malicious, he said that female bullying often takes the form of reputation destruction and gossip. He prefaced this whole bit by talking about "women who are out of control", merely talking about this doesn't disregard everything that's wrong with the behaviour of men. I also didn't catch him saying at any point "because women are natural gossipers, they can never be fully trusted", that must have been an inference on your part. He just mentioned the statistics involving the antisocial behaviour. This isn't in relation to the overall defined differences between every man and every women. It's a statement on the antisocial inclinations of one or the other. We shouldn't be afraid of the notion of female antisocial tendencies, we should be aware of the ways we can be harmful to others so we can prevents them. That's why I have somewhat enjoyed the more widespread awareness of toxic masculinity(just not when it's misapplied). When it comes to antisocial behaviour and guys.. that's been damn important for me to be aware of growing up, to protect myself from my own inclinations and those of others.
@@oWildChildo First, thank you for not attacking me for having a different interpretation of this interview. Secondly, Peterson is the master of "read between the lines". If you don't infer, his message has little value. My spouse is Canadian and my mother in law and mother love Peterson in a way that does not resonate with me. My husband is super bright and we are both very mechanically minded, we are a very good fit for each other. He tried his hardest to listen to a lecture given by Peterson and he turned to me and said, babe I have no idea what he was trying to tell me. This was after Peterson was invited to Fox and went on a mind boggling tirade that left everyone baffled. Why am I telling you this? My husband who is so bright, so smart, such a great provider, such a great dad is not untouchable. I don't bite my tongue because he is a good man and a good provider. I bite my tongue when I need to think about how I am going to approach a sensitive/difficult subject. I give my husband my best. He knows it. If I confront him, I am emotionally fucked up and I need him to get to know how important his position really is to me. When he gives me a thoughtless, mainstream garbage answer, I am like NO. I did not marry you to get a garbage answer that I could get from Reddit. I married you because your the most thoughtful, understanding of what it is like to be so poor with no prospects as a male who is supposedly "privileged". As I am writing this, I realized, the only interviewer who would tap into my greatest would be my spouse. Everyone else would get a shitty, semi-comical, evasive answer. No one else deserves my best. Is it kinda sexist? YES. She was trying to be provactive and irritating and she succeeded in getting under his skin. She got the better of him, unfortunately. This is not the battle of the sexes. He did not get his message across by overriding her cynicism and trying to date and accommodating current social norms by committing to relationships as a pathway to fulfillment. He is flawed, but having 2 women that I love, love him, made me reconsider what he wanted for humanity. Women can be cruel to men. Men can make women more cynical than God intended. You know what is true and real and powerful? Men and women make each other better. I am the best woman that I could be for my husband. My husband is the best man he could be for me as his spouse. Peterson does not take sensational, irritating women seriously. His fault is allowing and letting her dominate the conversation. I will give him a pass on being a passive male who allows an aggressive female dominant the narrative, he knew it was not worth it.
Have babies with a woman or man, the whole narrative changes. Bottom line is women and men bring so much value and worth to each other's lives, it is undeniable. I don't wish for the past, I am grateful for what I have. My man makes me better, I make him better. If you are a man or woman who is disenfranchised by the world, I get it and appreciate your struggle. Love is real and undeniable. Men need women and women need men. Stop fucking around and pretending this is not our relatity.
Will you stop saying that c word you ignorant piece of shit
The patience on this man. He does not get interviewed he gets attacked.
This gentleman is a saint for dealing with this crap in every interview.
Thanks to all for your likes, honestly I wasn't expecting this much of reactions again thanks😘
Still a Zionist. 😒
@SubconsciousDweller czcams.com/video/JQHH6o9ual8/video.html
But you can also try searching on YT:
- Jordan Peterson Zionism
- Jordan Peterson Jews
- Jordan Peterson Jewish Question
... & you'll get interesting results. 😉
@@davidbolha unless wiki is wrong
Zionism (Hebrew: צִיּוֹנוּת Tsiyyonut [t͡sijo̞ˈnut] after Zion) is the nationalist[fn 1] movement of the Jewish people that espouses the re-establishment of and support for[3] a Jewish state in the territory defined as the historic Land of Israel (roughly corresponding to Canaan, the Holy Land, or the region of Palestine).[4][5][6][7] Modern Zionism emerged in the late 19th century in Central and Eastern Europe as a national revival movement, both in reaction to newer waves of antisemitism and as a response to Haskalah, or Jewish Enlightenment.[8][9][10] Soon after this, most leaders of the movement associated the main goal with creating the desired state in Palestine, then an area controlled by the Ottoman Empire.
He isn't.
Internet is interesting thing, you can still find an article about microwave is bad for food or earth is flat.
Yeah. Hate to see women like her. Urgh. He's so emotionally mature.
David Bolha People are not even aware that 99% of nowadays jews are Ashkenazi jews who got nothing to do with biblical jews. Ashkenazi Jews mainly came from Russia back then before WWII but they started from Germany and then also Poland became their homeland for a lot of centuries because that was last of few countries in Europe where they were able to live in peace as rest of Europe just hated them (for a reason). They are now having a whole of the USA in their back pocket. Fun fact, Lenin was Ashkenazian Jew :)
The whole point of World War II was to create the state of Israel by making from mainly Polish and German Jews and of course other people, some sort of sacrifice for that goal. They achieved it and they do not allow those facts to be written in mainstream books for students and schools. You need to reach for pecks of information from different sources in order to get at least some kind of picture of the whole situation.
So by looking at that, I need to agree with Jordan Peterson that they are very intelligent people, but also I need to admit, that he is blinded just like most of the people on the fact, that we are being fooled by this fuking martyr mentality that jews love to represent only if they feel the urge to push their political agenda, because otherwise, they do not care about Auschwitz or at least Ashkenazian leaders do not care about it.
This guy speaks for all the men who have had enough of this bullshit. Keep up the good work
shoaib ahmed AND women who are sick of bullying,mob ,clich,mentality of women at work and ‘friendship’ groups too.my partner said he had literally never seen anything like the nastiness of women to other women before.
@@ashleybutler86 Exactely, also women. I wish people would really understand JBP.
Check out MGTOW
Ahmed, Jordan doesn't speak for all men, he speaks for Human-Beings!! Women and Men!!
That's Gospel truth...
“I studied antisocial behavior for 15 years… I’m actually quite an expert on it!”
This woman proves his point through out the interview
She actually proves his point by being provocative. Now that's the agression he meant.
When you interview someone you have to be provocative
@@eliasrutten3814 correct, but this interviewer is becoming emotional and taking his questions personally, then being very standoffish.
Elias Rutten Yeah but not like this.
In discussing "out-of-control-women", she heard the words "control" and "women" in the same sentence and was lost from there - feminist robot took over.
Equality.error.exe.404.
List what little mind she's got.
*feminist idiolog
I can picture the interviewer just absolutely destroying the average guy who's not as articulate as JP... what a horrible picture.
If I was him I think the temptation to tell her to look in the mirror would be too great.
Jordan Peterson is so good at talking clearly and putting all his ideas in order so fast. I feel like even if I’d studied everything Peterson has and was faced with questions like he does, I’d still have to sit there for a bit and sift through my mind for the right answers, but he can find every thought in his mind instantaneously.
“Listen to others as though they might know something you don’t.” - Peterson
My wife needs to hear this
1:45 She is clearly not listening to a word Jordan is saying because she is so engrossed in searching for her next line of attack
Selective hearing. A trait women accuse men of having.
+
Mick S INCORRECT!
She is blindsided by facts and discombobulated by his argument, but that's because feminists and SJW have less brains in her head than a dirty mop.
Feminists and SJW check their brains in at the door when they go into the temple of SJW to worship at Satan's altar. You didn't really believe that SJW were on equal standing with human beings, did you...??
And at 3:34 Jordan is just doodling away cuz he doesn’t even need to concentrate to outclass this witch
Can you even begin to imagine being married to this skank? Whooaaa!!!
@@michpich6319
When you listen to the low opinion that most feminists have about men in general, it is amazing that any man would marry any of them - unless they are of a subservient character.
Verbally hostile interviewer doesn't agree that women can be verbally hostile. Lol
Hypocrisy? Yes
Irony? Maybe
Hotel? Trivago
Hans Karps good one 😂
Hahaha true!#
@@kek397 That gave me a sensible chuckle.
She did not say so. She ask should they be control? So should men be controled. What a shit from him do say couse men do the same, a Boss shouting at his worker, hallo?
She’s not even listening, she is simply anticipating
Much Respect to You Sir Jordan Peterson... Your Lectures have REALLY Enlightened Me Sir ever since I came across them.. Thanks.
She literally acts passive aggressive as he's talking about "women have to express aggressive behavior some how" lol
Its comedic and revealing of the truth. Oh, the irony...
hahaha, yeah, she's protesting about 'female aggression: verbal attacks, discrediting, reputation destroying', while she herself's showing the very same example.
she's the butt of her own 'joke'.
seriously. who does this moron interviewer think she is to walk all over his points and ignore him completely? she was looking down the entire time he was speaking
@@gendoruwo6322 it's 100% her own insecurity about herself on display, it's kinda hilarious
The "patriarchal oppression" that feminists obfuscate about is simply society protecting itself from typical female behavior.
Remove that necessary control and voila, you have the social and economic upheaval of the modern western world.
She is literally becoming visibly agitated and assaults his character - proving what he says true!
Idiots (corporate slaves or those with an agenda) never listen to what is being said! Jordan was talking about women OUT OF CONTROL, and she asked him if MEN SHOULD CONTROL WOMEN???????
Maybe she is as dumb as to think that women are not controlled already by MEN AND PERVERTS IN AUTHORITY!
BAFS
I totally thought the same thing. lol
Ha! Exactly!
LOL she literally went after him with gossip,innuendo,and reputation destruction
she is Example A of this line of discussion.
Indeed.. while trying to counter his point she actually displayed the very behaviour he was talking about. m.czcams.com/video/XuI6GTY9eVc/video.html
This wasnt an interview. This was a subtle war waged by her. And Jordan won
This guys knowledge is second to none, when questioned, this guys knowledge proves he is on another level. He’s so humble in his search for truths. God bless you Mr Peterson
This woman is literally interrupting him and being rude on almost every answer that he gives. Horrible interviewer.
dayum this woman is obnoxious
womanterrupting
She’s proving his point completely
What do you expect from a feminist?
Man With No Name - and bang her sideways. She'd find so much relief...
Damn, she's such a stereotype she actually managed to destroy *her own* reputation.
@WolfBlaz: LoL
+WolfBlaz
She never really had a good reputation, that was clear in the first minute of this video. Fame isn't purchased with credibility in our time, unless you are one of the few Conservatives who haven't become zombies and are holding the line with the rest of us survivors...
If you google: stereotype. Her horse face pops up.
😂 she does look like a horse i had to put down last week.
@@timwoodward8113 are you one of those female bullies Jordan P is talking about yourself? Come on man 🙂
His words are so powerful, really enjoyable to watch.
This is a man right here, knows how to handle ANY BULLY THROWN HIS WAY, not only without anger but also without sarcasm, etc. Hats off to you .. that's strength, honorable strength that builds endurance against evil 💪
As someone who has been ruthlessly bullied by female bosses he’s absolutely right
Nicola YES.in women work places iv experienced bullying,and seen it,with high staff turn over.working with men can have its own issues...but NOTHING compared to working with women.nothing.they don’t just not like you but make it personal with life choices and marriage and family.
Sorry to hear that. Makes me sad to hear woman treating other woman that way. Hope you have better bosses now dear :)
janne van der end I do Janne, thank you so much for your kind words x
I quit my job because I was reporting to a woman. I managed to do it for almost three years, and called it quits. No regrets.
Exactly.
what an exemplary display of self control.
i also see an example of no self control on the interview. which is the other person.
Jordan Peterson can give Yoda, and many other self controlled characters (written by a lot authors) a run for their money. He is a real modern masculinity role model.
Self control?... his usual whiny and cranky tone, appeal to self credentials for lack of argument, aloofness and doodling on paper...? my teenage nephew has more poise and control than that.
+ "self control" -- the answer to "who should control women?"
I call bullshit
I love how he dished that up. Nicely.
How Dr. Peterson keeps his composure in many of these exchanges is extremely impressive...
As women we all know what he's saying is true. Any girl who has been on the receiving end of it will nod along enthusiastically, but seeing as this lady's so defensive it seems to me that she's probably mostly the aggressor in those situations. You can just tell she's hell on her female coworkers.
Yup this is ture. When a women comes after you she wants to destroy you and its petty.
Thanks for the honesty. 👍
Totally agree.
I'm only a bitch online where there is almost no repercussion. In real life, I would be pummeled daily if I was insulting to men.
She didn't get to have her own show by being the opposite.
Hearing this woman trying her best to draw him into being crucified as sexist is so irritating .
Justin Zaff right she is super irritating 😠
excellent comment
Yeah, that is the reason it is hard for me to watch interviews with J.B.P. It is usually summarizable by the interviewer just setting traps and him jumping them to explain a view or a topic that could have been explained easily in minutes. But no, they have to fight him, hinder him and do everything they can to just try him if he does a mistake. It is tiring.
He refuses to leave the logical fortress and it pisses her off.
She’s really quite agressive..
This woman is arguing for arguings sake or she is intellectually limited...
yep, she is purely acting, she seems like she is all for show. If she really was an out of control women she did a rotten job, (superficial fluff and not aggressive, just annoying, loud and distracting.) Pure fake acting on her part in my opinion. She was overt and truly aggressive out of control women in my life have been stealth and covert. This lady, just drama and fake and an attention seeking opportunist trying to cash in on his notoriety by being near him. Look how dilated her pupils are, his are steady and normal. Just another conversation for him, with an insincere fake of a lady. Call her aka Maury Povich.
Why not both? :p
It's infact a great interview.. passionate and respectful arguments/discussions bring about more clarity... and it's expected where ones established ideology is disrupted by a greater truth
He is dealing with this "out of control woman" very well .
That's Peterson's Super Power
I wish he'd pointed out to her that she's the exact type of "woman" he's talking about
@@NumberOneChina That ruins his whole schtick
Hahahahahaha!!!!
That women is so cringey..
I love how she's got this gigantic stack of notes and prep --- and he's just doodling.
yeah, the yawning chasm.
Yes I like his body language towards her. Total disinterest!!
While she doesn't get anything of what he says
The doodling had purpose and it worked well.
Because one is an expert and a guest, the other is a host and has to do some research try to have a pertinent interview
It's hard to argue with or persuade a smart person, but damn near impossible to do so with a stupid one. This women is a perfect example
he is SUCH a patient man!!!
This woman was a perfect example for the subject.
yes
And she so utterly unaware of what she's doing!
Yes! Jesus yes.
@@jsat5609 that's a narcissist for you... she reacts; she doesnt respond.
What purpose does that woman serve to others? She has mot intent to learn or provide knowledge. She just wants to trap Jordan to promote her agenda. It's sad, she is part of the problem.
She was triggered immediatly. She needs to control herself.
Farmers gonna farm, plumbers gonna plum. but yes, I think her kind of women come about when a woman has distant non-listening parents and a bad father who doesn't protect them when they are young. A traumatized person is easy to get into weird ideologies, such as radical politics and weird cults, and they are easy to control through their anger. She seems to have daddy issues, "oh now you gonna be my daddy telling me what to do??" and off they go...
@@ronnychristenjoyer6778 You're very much right. We need patience and reason, but I think we also need to be in touch with our feelings and understand them, because we often think that we are driven by our thoughts (ie reason and rationality) but actually we are controlled more by our emotions.
Psychological Warfare czcams.com/video/8mvEnnHAa4Y/video.html ?fh43
She’s a tit!!
And she had.
After listening to her response to him, I think I rolled my eyes so hard that I damaged the back of my head.
i never get tired of watching Jordan kick ass
She’s too busy being offended to do a proper interview
She's trying to destroy his reputation and the entire psychological study on women for over 30 years by trying to rip science down to, "That's his opinion and therefore my opinion is evidence against over 30 years of research." Thankfully he's a smart man and keeps his responses within the realm of logic and facts. Until he states his opinion, instead of stating facts, she has no ability to validate her opinion, cause there are no facts to back her up.
@Daniel Right, We all know that what Jordan is saying is true even without the stats to back up his facts. She also confirms what he's trying to say by just being offended and just arguing because she is emotional and doesn't want to face the data and what studies say.
Terrible interview because if you're going to attack someone's work please do your research and present a valid argument based on evidence as most people do think that using logic and studies actually do matter.
As patrice oneal said.. you gotta be logical against a emotional women
Hardly an interview, some have pointed it out, she is a perfect demonstration of the female antisocial behavior.
haha, She's too busy being Passive Aggressive
She’s a terrible interviewer. She should let her guests speak their minds. Geez.
@@victortesla4198 Is his stuttering at the end though cuz her rudeness took a toll
@George Washington while massaging his feet as he eats it
@@numba1jebac he's probably feeling attacked, rightfully so. This chick is something else but no one is 100% immune to antagonization.
@@bettycooper369 Rightfully so, 100% agree. Know so from personal experience where in rare cases I even found myself shaking n burning on the inside involuntarily from anger
You are precisely correct. I spent many years on the air in college, perhaps eight in total, and I would never have treated any guest as she did. She has no place on the air whatsoever. I'm not sure she qualifies as the cleaning lady.
thank you jordan
Jordan is brilliant not always correct, but very brilliant and necessary during these times of censorship!!!
She desperately wants him to be a misogynist so she can justify her grieved world view.
The left are the new hate
Yesssssss
You nailed it!
@Traditional Harmonicas nope.
Nailed it!
This "lady" is the pure example of the toxic, non physical aggression. 👍
Of one type
On another level
His last quote was an indirect arrow to the heart for her. Well deserved too
My God is this woman ever verbally hostile and aggressive !
The word is cunt
Like he is not?... Ah sorry.... I forgot,... us women need to be agreeable and docile, so we can get paid less money, and men can be superior in the dominance hierarchy. 🙄🤦🏼
@@thaliagarcia9684 bitch get the fuck back into the kitchen.
is he? hostile? aggressive? are you kidding me?
Women are made from Sugar and Spice and all good things nice. How the hell could they be hostile?
An out of the control woman is interviewing him 🤣🤣🤣
I searched all over for this!!! thank you mate
Too good 🤣😁
Lmao! You are so right! 🤣
She asks a question and can't shut the F U to listen. Example of out of control right there.
😅😗
What Patience, respect that and what Craziness Hate it
Love how she totally personifies what Jordan says.
"I am actually very good at keeping my temper under situations where there is substantial reasons not to." glancing at interviewer.
Psychological Warfare czcams.com/video/8mvEnnHAa4Y/video.html ?fh43
I sure used to be. I miss that.
Camera should have zoomed in on her 🤣🤣🤣
Just her hairstyle irritates me and then boom she overtalks him smh. I would love to develop his level of patience.
Exactly ! Lol
Admiring Peterson for his patience
Dude he schools everyone it's awesome
An old man in my village used to say:
"Time and Patience will take a snail to Jerusalem"
But then that's a snail without a feminatzi on its back.
Phalanx true as bob
In a sense he's demonstrating why crazy women should be avoided. Even if you had his remarkable patience, you wouldn't want to be forced to rely on it constantly.
2:25 when he says : "I am actually quite an expert". Maaan look at his humility 🤯
Jordan is an absolute champ at not giving into baiting tactics but he's also said in interviews with non hostile interviewers that he hates this sort of confrontation. You can see he really hates being there having to defend himself from this person who's attacking a characeteur of him that others have made.
Oh my god. This is the kind of woman whose ignorance embarrasses me.
Your doing the same thing.
itsmejerkface it’s “you’re” darling heart 👌🏻
Shell Richards I get the impression that you are not out of control. Please keep speaking your mind. The only way people will have a healthier view of each other is when reasonable people speak. Even just a short statement like your original post. Thank you for your feedback.
It shouldn't, she represents only herself for all anyone knows
@@MultiShell80 Right! To clarify for most (but not all!) of the people who attended school after 1990, You're = You + are. Your means something that belongs to you.
This women is making a fool of herself and I'm loving it.
Jordan Peterson is such a great psychologist. No doubt his study is so deep and realistic.
He's brilliant
The interviewer is nuts.
crazy redheaded nutter
Ceasar Coleman its ridicilous, it seems scripted they put crazy dumb people in front of him in every interview. No honest on earth critic. But maybe i see only those crazy interviews cause only they get viral.
I've talked with at least 4 women like that last week. No one is safe.
You got that right. So disrespectful
Ceasar Coleman she absolutely is. She need to learn how to listen to hear his stance or position rather than just interrupt him through each sentence
She is one of the women he talked about. That’s why she’s triggered.
she truly is a pain in the ... and too thick to get his point at all
$10 says she's childless and single xD
She started bullying him in the questioning and tried to spoil his reputation. A classic female aggressive maneuver she failed to recognize as to exactly what he was talking about. She fell for the trap.
@@EroticOnion23 that doesn't have to be causal - she would be the exact same obnoxious, selfrighteous bully if she had children and a spouse, I bet.
@@fturla___156 so Jordan brought it up intentionally, and it went over her head?
love this man! i thought she was cool wrt her show and it flowed well (based on this short version of the whole)
This is so funny, thank you JP for all your honesty.
Jordan Peterson: women can be verbally aggressive.
Triggered aggressive woman: no they are not (aggressive noises) 🤬🤬🤬
" I am not interviewing the literature, I'm interviewing you" in other words, I don't want to hear the facts, I want to hear your feelings
M. S. well said
M. S. Yup. Women are all feelings. You shouldnt try to understand them, or be kind to them, or relate to them, or even really give them more than 10 feet of rope to operate with, UNLESS THEY EARN IT.
@ pred ater- She wants him to prove her ideologies are correct. These ideologues interview him in an attempt to be the one who eliminates the threat he presents. They want expose the evil monster they desperately need him to be. These people have an agenda and it isn't the pursuit of truth.
M. S. Excellent comment
I was looking for this exact comment as soon as I got to that point in the vid, cuz I new I needed to upvote it
I LOVE that Peterson is doodling through this interview. I wonder if that helps him keep his temper. hehe
Totally love this interview.
But I do question the premise.
3:27 this mfking legend is so relaxed that he is drawing
😂
Wowww.
Oo0O0oO Maybe he is distracting himself to not to lose cool. Legend though for real!
He's drawing a devil in a dress. Was attempting a portrait of his 'interviewer'.
The interviewer is quite annoying. We've seen this many times over - A person that argues to "win" the conversation rather than listen thoughtfully to gain an understanding.
This interviewer is quite annoying. And even more distressful, interviewers like her are common. I am trying to think of positive formal interviews with JP that I’ve seen. I can’t think of more than three. The rest of the time he is being interrupted, taken out of context, having his rhetoric warped, teamed up on, and/or not taken seriously. I love watching him stand his ground. He allows the unreasonable people to manifest themselves as unreasonable. And it is beautiful.
UK types think that their accent makes everything they say more true.
@@TacShooter Interesting perspective. I do know that Americans feed into that. It's not so much how you sound but what you're saying.
Imani Kaliid Ye I agree what a silly women get in the kitchen love
Bingo! Well said Imani.
There are way too many of these types in the media these days.
It’s like they feel that everybody enjoys a good argument and it’s even better if it’s on network TV.
She is proving his point with her reaction. It would have been refreshing to not see her taking it personally, and to be curious instead of what he had to offer.
I love this man! He is the proof that there is too many,TOO MANY stupid or ignorant people.
3:55 False Narrative: "you succeed most when you say something provocative"
Jordan Peterson: "stand up straight with your shoulders back, clean your room, take responsibility for yourself."
How provocative!
Also avoid women who cause entrapment... Like her.
What’s entrapment? I
She's awful!!
It might seem like Jordan Petersen in this video is trying to assume characters about woman off the top of his head but, he is not. He is basing it on literature. But, your view is just a generalisation of identity of "woman who cause entrapment." Come on man, be logical!! What does "woman who cause entrapment." even mean???
@@shabuqazi86 the entrapment I'm referring to here is trying to trap someone into saying something incriminating to use against them as evidence of proving them guilty of some crime of injustice against society.
@@MOON-zo3ik for example at the start of video when he said avoid women out of control she took it literally and tried to make him look bad by saying u think u should control women
Funny coming back and I still have a similar response but I am able to clarify it better for myself. I guess I have grown since 2020!
3:06 Jordan's smirking and doodling while she's getting herself worked up. Seems like he's drawing a nice kitty. That concentration strain At 3:20 shows he's perfecting the cat's whiskers 😺. very important can't forget the whiskers
Interesting that I just watched one of his lectures where he describes a psychopath who used the technique you described. If you did see him "doodling" the you have proven that Peterson is the biggest fraud and psychopath out there. He learned a technique from a psychopath, then hypocritically uses the same technique to attempt to manipulate others when he is cornered.
Thanks for exposing that.
She didn't "get herself worked up." He did. She was calm and asked him questions as an interviewer is supposed to do. He raised his voice and became uncontrollable.
You ARE one of those naive and gullible people he lectures about. You didn't even see he is a psychopath AFTER he lectured a class on the very technique you've described.
@@kdphotos4691 maybe try and watch the video couple of times with listening of what they are talking about. He has clear and we'll articulated points that are backed up with scientific data. It seems to me that the woman got trigger because she didn't like the presented data to her and all of the sudden got ignorant to what Jordan said. Instead of listening, she tried to twist words so Jordan will look bad and that is exactly the point he was trying to explain
@@MsSlice09 - Again, HE is being interviewed. Not "scientific data" which has been debunked repeatedly since the early 2,000s anyway.
People, THINK. Use your brains and try to think analytically and critically. I get it that he is some sort of cult hero, but he is still just a misogynist who hides behind his academic background.
This isn't difficult. When you interview someone, you want to know what *they* think, NOT what he read somewhere. HE is being interviewed because he has opened his mouth and said some incredibly stupid things. He needs to own his words, the same as those who do not have a cult following them and believing their every word, right or wrong.
@@kdphotos4691 If you listenen the interview carefully, he gave a perfectly good explanation to what you are saying here.
She proved him right.
Ohh you..
her ring finger also indicates she is avoided by men.
@@MrSinister718 not 100% sure I think she is married to a mangina who can be found scrubbing her handmade woollen tights on a washboard every Monday in the scullery.
I must have missed that part
yes, it was interesting to hear jordan say it and then she did it ...
"I'm very good at keeping my temper under situations where there's substantial reason not."
Like this interview.
Loved that comment. Laughed out loud. He is an epic person.
Straight to comments
From my experience, he's exactly right. I've met far more women who engage this type of behavior.
I am not going to argue for or against your personal experiences with women, but what I think he completely ignored because it does/did not fit his narrative is how physically aggressive women are becoming. If you have never experienced physical abuse from a woman, you are very fortunate. When we talk about "equality" we can not just focus on how the patriarchy has stunted women's growth or trying to provide adequate funding to women's sports ( think title IX). We also have to recognize that women have been losing their feminine sensibility and gravitating towards a male approach to conflict resolution. Women ARE physically aggressive, especially to men. To deny this current phenomenon is not benefiting anyone. If she said something along the lines of I know plenty of women who have acted out in a way that could or did physically harm their male partner and I myself have fantasized about harming my male partner, how do you help the "out of control" woman who aligns with male "out of control" behavior? She had every right to question his absolute commitment to a somewhat narrow vision of what is out of control in a woman. I am not going to say that his deficiencies define him. I think he is a person who loves humanity deeply. I never knew who she was until this clip and I listened to other interviews she conducted to give me a better understanding of her skills. She is intense and unapologetic. This is her style. It is not what I value in a good interviewer, but Jordan did not get special or harsher treatment than her other guests.
Peterson says that the data suggests that women tend to destroy peoples character using gossip and innuendo as opposed to using violence when showing aggression.
Female interviewer in response continually tries to destroy Peterson's character using gossip and innuendo.
This is too perfect.
PistachioMan what I was thinking . She seems pissed
Yeah, and instead of confronting him physically, she does exactly what women do to their opponents - attempts to discredit him.
Verrikan ok, but would it been better if she started to smack him?
evil ask85
yeaaa, that's pretty fucked up :| i hope they're not friends anymore
you have to cut people out of your life like that
I was a CEO of a medium sized company for a while and one thing I learnt was that the women dominated HR department routinely screened out competent female candidates that were also physically attractive. Of course, the HR manager would never admit to this but it became abundantly obvious once we reinterviewed candidates that had failed a preliminary screening. A clear case of passive aggressive.
I have known more than one woman who tried to avoid working for a female supervisor. They much preferred a male boss.
@S Robin - 'the girls in my dept were high school graduates only in their middle twenties, early thirties' - S Robin, these people are called women. Sounds like you just didn't fit in.
Fuk yes that happens almost 100 % of the time..
Yep. What he said
He is the best in knockout this kind of "reporter" -