How to Build Player Profiles - $1kNL Liveplay
Vložit
- čas přidán 6. 03. 2024
- In this week's video, Uri sits down for another 1kNL/500NL mixed liveplay. Not everything goes his way this time, but he still manages to impart some of that Uri wisdom we've all come to know and love.
Editor's note: Seems like some of you did like the newer style last week, with a focus on one zoomed-in table, but you spoke up a bit late! So this week's video has a light touch while we still figure out what style to use moving forward.
-----------------------
Be sure to check out Uri's highly-acclaimed course, Elite Cash Game Exploits! Exploit your opponents; print money. Become a master of exploitative poker and watch your win-rate soar!
upswingpoker.com/elite-cash-g...
upswingpoker.com/product/red-...
----------
Want a 10% discount on a great HUD and database analysis tool? Try Hand2Note:
Link: hand2note.com/?aid=5e47
Code: guerrillapoker10 - Hry
These live plays are my favourite content, please keep them coming! ❤
I reaaly like ro see this kind of liveplays and listen to your thinking process!
I’ve been noting peeps helps out a lot thx for tips outside the obvious stuff 🎉
Great vid!
Hello, The kj suited at 15 min on the turn the ace should interact with his range quiet often being in a 3 bet pot vs the big blind. With this spot I can’t explain in words exactly why but I much prefer the check on the turn to allow in position river play. A few hands prior you played a turn the same way with a high equity draw and bluffed the river my intuition on this hand would be to bluff the turn to provide equity denial. Please could you explain the pros and cons off equity denial in these spots with a high equity draw. When you stab and don’t realise your equity by folding on the turn this is obviously a ev loss what properties should we be looking for when to consider checking and betting in these spots ?
Ak hand very interesting.....very dryish....may be x some with clubs and pure barrel turn ak without a club....maybe a longer breakdown with a solver next vid...
Enjoyed the video. Cheers.
Are you not using BB but dollar for the video? btw about the AcAs hands,I think we'd continue with Ac mostly because it was 4bp they have less QQ(shove prf)/unblock their calling range/high eq,but what do I know
A gto sim at the end of the video would make these videos better…that way we can see if your AK hand was a threshold call and what villian could be bluffing with.
Hey Uri,
Im usually a bg fan of how you play - but i think this session you made some pretty big mistakes in my opinion.
1. 55 vs weazels AA, why would you ever trap a set here? No need to take nuts to protect your x back range....you loose a bunch of value vs big part of his range, and your shove vs river bets always look so nutted anyways and he might get away from his bluffcatchers...
2. just the next hand. I m again reeeally surprised to see you checking back AA with a club in a 4bet pot back on a turn that isnt too bad for your range. Again, same mistakes, why taking nuts to protect your x back range? You seem to misunderstand a few things here. (AA without a club i can get behind checking back as we are drawing dead vs value, but AAc is easiest bet/call here....)
3.And same mistake again in the 4bet pot AK vs his 9Ts.Again - your taking nuts to protect your x back range and again loose sooo much value vs his range, AK never checks here, you can check back AQ and AJ...and as played you probably can just fold vs human here as most ppl underbluff this spot quite a bit (might be fine to call vs this guy, given that he shows up with 9T lol...)
4. the KJhh hand where you get shoved on: another huge blunder, this hand checks 100%, 1. its a disaster to get shoved on. 2. you block his folds (JJ and KK)...you much rather bluff 8x, 77 etc that dont mind getting shoved on and unblock folds...
I was thinking the same these hands aren’t good slowplays and checked a solver which confirmed AA and 55 are EV mistakes
16:30 you call that AK on the river that also completes the backfd. If you take a look again at the video, you can tell that guy was speaking to you and asking if is a YT video also with other guy.
I mean haha, it may be going too far, but for me (watching and not playing) was kinda obvious that he had some QQ AQ or flush and he SNAPjammed river so you called because of his timing.
Just saying xD
Great vid as allways!
AKo 4bet hand, as played solver folds there 80%, call is breakeven against a solver and this spot is underbluffed imho so I reckon it's -EV probably. Watching this my gut also screamed fold, but probably would've called like you did... gotta fix that.
Btw vs your flop bet sizing solver almost pure min-raises AQ. Actually calling very very little there.
very interesting...
to add one basic point: Qc is surely the exact worst card in the deck, not just a bad card
secondly: if he has T9hh or something, maybe he won't love the Qc to bluff, seeing as hero can definitely have QQ,
also, regarding blockers, and not sure which of these are important or even correct: Villain has no flush blockers. Villain knows we can easily have a good flush blocker that makes us almost auto-call. Plus we can have some flushes?
just some low-stakes thoughts
I see you worry much about how solvers play. Solvers play exactly if was palying against gto robots aka another solver. No one plays equal a solver.
So forget the solvers and play the population.
A7 hand where u check raise all in on River. I don’t like the all in, you have all the cards there and he’s semi bluffing just go small and get a possible call? All in for huge amount I don’t get.
Weazel was raging at u for taking so long lol
Weazel is an entitled fish who thinks he’s a reg because he had a top 0.1% run in triton
@@Jacobson-dp7gg GG is rigged for the whales so.....
@@Jacobson-dp7gg I can't understand the hype around Weazel tbh
Fix that posture, brother
Villains timing on the AK hand just screams value. If he had airballs he would at least evaluate the board and the action before shoving. A snap decision in this spot means it's an easy decision ie nuts a lot. Combinatorically there are a lot of valuecombos anyway, and yes also 3/4th of whiffed suited combo's are also in his river landing range, but at the end these are secondary arguments. How often do you see someone presumably competent snap shoving on a texture changing river and have it be a bluff? 10%? 5%? Definitely not the ~37% you need to call this jam.
Hmm you are talking that opening CO for 2x is a EV mistake, and you are opening yourself to 2.2x which is blunder as well. For this rake environment you should open to 2.165x (monker max ev size) unless you have exploitative incentives to do something else. BTW ev difference between 2.165x and 2x is lower then between 2.165s an 2.2x. People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones my boy
It literally doesn’t matter
@@robinjansen6145 sure. Keep grinding NL100
Never XB AK in this spot. You have AJ, AQ, AT whatever, + AA....
lol tell me you play microstakes without telling me.
Nothing wrong with XB and its good. Vils will float eg the T high peel. vil will have to jam the other 2 bdfd combos that bricked too + other hands.
@@agnorax no need to pull solvers, I bet you my entire microstakes bankroll that XB frequency is below 20% for AK if not less.
@@agnorax yeah...so if u are into gtowizard u can check
solutions?solution_type=gwiz&gmfs_solution_tab=ai_sols&gametype=Cash6m500zGeneral&depth=100&gmff_depth=100&gmff_type=general&gmff_rake=NL500&gmff_opening_size=gto&gmff__3bet_size=gto&gmfft_sort_key=0&gmfft_sort_order=desc&preflop_actions=F-F-R2.3-F-R11.5-F-R25-C&history_spot=12&board=Ad8h2c3c&flop_actions=X-R5.1-C&turn_actions=X
Taking bets with degenerates isn’t exactly EV so I’ll pass.
Open your mind a little here and it will do wonders for your game and help you get out of micros.
Never and always are seldom terms used in poker.
Solver isn’t a static tool, you can get all sorts of different outputs changing the assumptions the sim is based on.
There very well may be an output in this spot where checking even higher may have merit.
Point is, if you’re blindly assuming outputs without considering the assumptions you won’t get far.
@@agnorax nice trolling. Did I stack you playing my microstakes?
I checked the solver AFTER my comments and it pretty much confirmed that AK is like 2% XB if that.
You can see by the KJ b/f a few minutes before the hand that Uri self-admittedly wasn't playing well.
Looking forward to stacking u again, let me know it's you in chat.
Getting set over setted by @Weazel_1991...harsh.
Is this the video maker by that nickname?
@@susymay7831 Yep! We will probably see the same hands in his next video :)