By the time CFC's we're identified as a problem their patents had expired. Manufacturing had shifted from the big chemical companies to small low cost/low profit companies. The politically powerful big companies had no interest in keeping CFC's and the small manufacturers had no political power. A shift to the new type of refrigerant, HFC's, would be profitable for the big, politically powerful companies. This is how there was the political impetus to switch. Now that HFC's have been identified as greenhouse gasses, and their patent protection has expired, the big, politically powerful manufacturers have new (profitable) refrigerants to replace them. Don't expect there to be the political will to do significant change from hydrocarbons to renewables until the politically powerful can make profit.
Karla Berger, we mainly used 2 refrigerants in the USAfrom the early 1950s until the early 1990s (replacing methyl methanoate, a highly flammable and poisonous compound), R12 A.K.A. dichlorodifluoromethane (used in automobiles and refrigerators mainly) and R22 A.K.A Chlorodifluoromethane, (used in household and commercial AC units mainly and in aerosol cans as the propellant), there were other refrigerants and other uses but those were the main culprits for CFC in the refrigerant industry in the USA, they were mainly used because they were relatively safe for consumers (being non flammable) and cheap to manufacture. They were replaced with more costly and generally extremely flammable volatile hydrocarbons, typically propane, n-butane and isobutane. Dimethyl ether (DME) and methyl ethyl ether are also used which ironically emit just as much Co² as CFC's did (unlike what Trace clams in this clearly left leaning libtarded video) because they are literally hydrocarbon molecular chains. Gary is right the patients on R12 and R22 "Freon" which is a DuPont brand names not an actual gas name (as I wrote the names of above) ran out decades ago. Free market enterprise economy creates jobs and technology you can see this today as DuPont is phasing out R134 tetrafluoroethane for Tetrafluoropropene HFO 1234yf because it s lower in CO² production and has a valid patent. It has nothing to do with the Paris climate agreement that we are no longer part of but a better "freon" that makes less CO² emissions, that everyone in the world will have to buy off of DuPont to meet these unrealistic climate goals (that I will bet money not a single large economy nation [France, Germany are examples] will be able to meet, but that is opinion not fact).
Maybe if you just nurtured a relationship with a cfc instead of just hooking up with it and throwing it away when the first UV ray comes along, maybe they wouldn't feel the need to tear molecular families apart, hm? Upper atmospheric hookup culture is to blame!
President Trump also doesn't care about arts, he just massively defunded them. Oh shit, now they will now need to provide content that is worthy of donations and is not funded by force. Oh shit, now they will need to improve themselves and make more interesting content than lazy rehashed uninteresting brainded propaganda. What a fucking tragedy
that's why i believe that we need a reality clause : if a politician holds a position that contradicts scientific facts and makes policy based on those opinions then that politician should be kicked out of office regardless of the office they hold
That sounds problematic, though, as it's open to abuse. It's our responsibility not to vote a candidate that distrusts science. Even now, there are scientists that is paid to research an (probably fake) evidence of the absence of global warming. When your clause is implemented, this illegal activity will only increase.
This is why im not ultimately too worried. Cause if history has taught us anything, it's that humans have a history of getting their shit together when it hits the fan. Should it be that way? Probably not, but hey it is what it is.
I love this guy, he always makes science ten times more interesting plus he's funny af. Unlike the others they're boring and they can't keep my attention on them.
Did you actually read the Paris Agreement and how specific it is one why the US is the only one being told to pay for the aid on the agreement while China and India specifically don’t have to deal with paying their part with less consequences? If this agreement is a benefit to all nations, why is it that only the US is to pay for the research and development of plans to reduce CO2 emissions? And don’t give me that because we’re the riches country argument, if this is a joint effort, US shouldn’t be paying for this alone. That’s why we stepped out of the agreement because it wasn’t a fair agreement.
Corporations. That's why. Corporations fund both politicians and surveys. That's why i don't buy into the whole "petrol cars are bad, electric cars are good but 5 times more expensive". Give me a break, if they really care about environment they would invest in public transportation and walking or riding bikes. Same as "meat is bad, so you should buy this vegan product that costs 10 times more".
If I watch CZcams videos til 6 to 7 am do I have a problem? I mean sleeping wise as long as I get 8 to 9 hours I feel perfectly fine. I don't get tired no signs at all. I do feel my brain gravitating towards entertainment but I'm not seeing any negative signs.
I think the government should allow scientists to observe and research every companies new product, and if it’s dangerous to the environment, it’s not allowed to be produced.
And then what? You create a big and onipotent monopoly!! Great!! And what more? Huh what more? You rise prices because now every product is being under study! Not to mention the lack of liberty as now the government has the right to intervenue with private businesses! And the cherry on the cake: We'll have nothing being allowed to produce at all because every single atom has to come from somewhere, and that somewhere will always be nature! Great, you're a genius!
Fake News with zero backing empirical evidence that can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that we had any affect on the ozone layer. Nothing more than a click bait title and a man rambling off some quasi intellectual scientific observations without ever reaching a true conclusion that backs the click bait title. The willfully ignorant are the only idiots that consider this tabloid fake news video to have any merit. LOL
You're a complete idiot. You are the flat earther. If Seeker told you the earth was flat you are the sort of idiotic sheep that would accept it as fact. It's called science and research kid try it some time instead of being a willfully ignorant sheep with no argument aside from childish insults like calling people flat earthers.
Climate change is a process that has occurred over billions of years since the earth came into existence. I think you are confused no one has ever made that claim nor did I child. Your weak non argument sidestepping and attempts at mental gymnastics to get around the fact that there is zero provable evidence beyond a shadow of a doubt that humans have repaired the ozone layer or damaged the ozone layer is laughable. The burden of proof is always upon the party or person making the claims, so therefore unless you can right now create a perfect emulation of our planet in a global sized experiment that spans decades to the stretch of centuries which can provide viable empirical evidence to even remotely prove any negligible amount of gases from human activity were some how magically able to damage the ozone layer or lack there of these insignificant amounts of gases were able to reverse a hole in the ozone layer and repair it over the span of several decades directly caused by human activity despite volcanic activity ( i.e. natural causes) being the major contributing factor with humans having over the past 250 years contributed just one part of CO2 in 10,000 to the atmosphere. One volcanic cough can do this in a day. That's 0.01% percentile or 1/10,000 for human gas contribution in CO2. If your simple mind can comprehend all this then come back and talk to me. You have no argument.
Aro Man, what is hateful? The character Biff from Back to the Future was based on Donald Trump www.theguardian.com/film/2015/oct/23/back-to-the-future-writer-bad-guy-biff-was-based-on-donald-trump .
im pretty everyone knows meat is bad for the enviroment. its just that people eat meat anyway. i only buy meat when its about to expire in the supermarket 20 min before the store closes. but im sure that still counts as supporting the meat industry.
Everyone knows this and its a issue tht is near impossible to solve without decades of easing it in. Without meat then we will an even worse epidemic of hunger. So will we stop making meat at the expense of killing off a good portion of our population or will we continue producing meat at the expense of the environment? Either option is bad with the latter being the lesser of 2 evils but ppl are naturally scared of death bc we're animals too (instincts), so we wuld end up choosing the former. So pretty much nothing we can do b4 the point of no return comes.
Ha! Teachers in our country still tell kids that the ozone Layer is getting thinner. The problem with teachers is that once they learn their education they stick with that knowledge and then transfer that knowledge to their pupils in school.
Seriously, the passive-aggressive tone referring to America is just petty and annoying. If you want to single something out, just do it outright, it makes you sound less of an ass. I'm not disagreeing or trying to be controversial, just please be direct in implications, not falsely subtle. When you do that, but it's a subject on which everyone is immediately clear on what you're talking about, it's not clever, it just sounds boorish.
If he had said it outright... he would have stated the fact that the US didn't want to sign on. That's a thing that happened. By pretending to be subtle about it, he just sounds like a kid on a playground pretending not to directly talk about someone behind their back, and just comes off pretentious and dickish.
Rhetoric at its finest? So pretending you're not directly talking about someone behind their back like a kid on a playground instead of just plainly stating that a country didn't sign an agreement is rhetoric at its finest? Aristotle sure would be proud, huh?
Ozone is the smell of electrical equipment, especially high powered radio transmitters. 0zone is so rare, that we could produce enough to replace it. If we are concerned about carbon dioxide levels and global warming, we need to adopt LFTR. Check it out on the internet.
Because it's a fraud. The holes are natural to Earth and fluctuate as the Earth spins. We all want to love our planet but be careful, many people are making money off this love and use words to tug on your heart like, MAYBE, MIGHT, COULD and IF... These are trick words to manipulate people who do not think but follow because of love.
The truth is that Dupont's patent was going to expire. They pushed the ozone narrative. Ever since the 80's band they have produced an alternative product. They now make even more profit.
there should be an agreement on all kind of nonbiodegradable polymers.the one that manufactures the polymer should cut out on their profit to recover atleast 80% of it's manufactured polymers.
You could mention the way in which ozone captures UV-light, but it'd probably screw your smartass "politicians i'm not daring to address by name are ruining the atmosphere, because they can"-routine. For those of you who skipped chemistry for sociology -- ozone is an unstable substance, that created when a loose oxygen atom meets O2 molecule with consumption of a UV-photon, after some time it breaks down to O + O2 with extra energy dissipating as a heat. Yep chlorine is affecting this balance, but more air is UV-exposed the more ozone is created.
Perhaps you shouldn't have left out an ozone 'hole' is one in which a region of ozone falls below 220 dobson units. Naturally ozone levels drop above this threshold in polar winters when no Sun is shinning on that region. Due to ODSs ozone levels continue to drop past the 220 DU threshold forming a 'hole'. If you want to call out others on their science you better make sure to get yours correct.
The main problem is the people dont understand how those adversarial actions affect the environment and only take notice when the whole world is almost doom.
Crimson King you can’t ignore the fact that one of the biggest greenhouse emitting countries aren’t signed in because of Trump. He is literally the reason we aren’t in. It’s not a surprise and they aren’t at fault for “mentioning” him
when you said CFC and aerosol cans I thought about the DuPont Monopoly in patents there's reasons why there is not an ozone in the Southern and Northern hemispheres of this planet you do need sunlight to create naturally occurring ozone. but I forgot the world was flat in the sun's always there because we're stuck under the dome maybe that's the reason. For god sakes how come we don't pay carbon tax we could have saved the planet by now raise those taxes save the planet.
vincent schuurhof he was praising him for not being political about global warming. Global warming by itself isn't political but the disagreements behind it is.
It _does_ sound familiar. It's the same thing that is happening _right now_ with *animal agriculture* -- the largest human-made environmental catastrophe in the history of our species, very well known, and virtually not talked about. #govegan
Purple Turtle you don't even have to kill nor use animals tale a couple hundred cells and you can make indefinitely meat with no deaths, isn't that your dream as vegans?
As if in the history of the Earth there has never been a period where organisms created more methane or carbon dihidroxyde than we have today? I don't know, and I doubt anyone does. From quick Google searches I've read that the percentage of C2O in the captured (frozen air) was the same as today. Global warming is a scam. It's just corporations invested in batteries and solar panels, and now they need someone to buy them. Same with food. Corporations need consumers for their overpriced "vegan/gluten free" food.
jack ripper Nahh. You’re missing the details bro. Take the level of CO2 over the previous decades and you’ll see a massive spike. That’s what’s causing the big discussion on climate change. As for the vegan/gluten part I feel going vegetarian wouldn’t hurt. Plus gluten is bad for you :/
I appreciate the message tacit and overt. Question though: Why is "refrigerant management" listed in "Drawdown" (edited by Paul Hawken) as the #1 solution to climate change? It sounded from this video as if Montreal Protocol had, at least to some degree, dealt with that.
China has 1,3 billion people and the US has 300 million... Still the US is emitting more than half the amount carbon dioxide that China is. The only problem at this point is the US and the stupid people who live there.
and china is pulling a huge effort to fight global warming: reforestation on a massive scale (they will reach the 2030 target in 2020), its now the largest producer of solar power , the only nation focused on developing Thorium MSR ...and the list goes on
it sounds like we have to do this if we want to protect our ozone, dunno why this is debatable, if we have to phase out specific chemicals thats just what we have to adjust to.
The 70's seems to have been the last time the USA had something approaching government for the people. Reagan's 'new morning in America' brought deregulation, the decline of journalism, and Milton Friedman's failed neoliberal economics. It was not a dawn but twilight.
These problems existed for years. Every country is responsible. The USA is already leading the world on emission cuts. However, one country should not be paying others to cut back on pollution.
Banning refrigeration gases always takes a while. There's been R22 and R23 about 15-20yrs ago, those were the 2 main gases used. A lot of countries agreed on getting rid of it because of their devastating effect on the ozone layer, but for another 5 to 10 years you were allowed to refill it in already existing systems but not to use fill new ones with it. After that period of time you had to change gases and for that you had to change the sealing gasket where it was possible (solenoid valves for example) otherwise it would happen pretty fast for those gaskets to get a leakage. But even changing the sealing gaskets wasn't the solution. Still most of the system where they were changed were leaking after months or a few years. Same thing is now happening with R404a. The prices already rose extraordinarily high this year. However there are more more systems (especially supermarkets) built containing R744 as a refrigerant, which is nothing else but CO2 and not as bad for the enivronment as the other gases. For example 3kg R404 has a CO2 equivalent of 11 metric tons of CO2. However CO2 is running with a much higher pressure which makes construction costs higher due to more safety devices required like gas warners in cold rooms, high pressure release valves on every compressor, thicker copper tubes and so on. Cause yeah, you dont normally run above 30bars with 1,5mm wall thickness of the tube. For higher pressures you use a thicker tube and the high pressure required isn't to joke with. On the suction side you have around 25 bars compared to 2 bars with R404a (depends on the required suction gas temp, the deeper you want your temperatur the less of pressure you have).
Government all over the world should make rule to plant at least one tree or small plant in each an every home .this will lead control temperature growth
Can you please discuss methanes effect on the ozone v Co2's effect. I've heard methane is 3 times more devestating and that cattle are the main contributors and that they're doing more damage than all vehicle emmisions combined. Could this be right?
Well perhaps the threat of GW is seemingly less real, especially to many in richer nations. The threat of contracting skin cancer from just being out in the sun on the other hand, seems to be far more universal, terrifying and immediate than the prospects of creeping shorelines.
how it all happened.. *World starts ending* Industry: "It's not our fault" *Science proves industry is to blame, Vienna Conventions passed* Industry: "Fine we'll sign it, but you have to reimburse our lost income."
So leaving the Paris agreement, is pretty much for big companies to do whatever they want. Creating more factories is more jobs, but at the expense for a healthy planet for future generations. The only ppl to blame is yourself america.
The reason the Montreal protocol worked so well, was because it was a binding contract, which is why the Paris Agreement doesn't mean that much. If we could get countries to sign a binding Climate Change agreement, we could actually make a difference.
That was a cheap shot at the current administration, and the paris agreement is a bad deal for the U.S.. Just look at the many details that it would require us to perform while many other countries would have to do little to nothing.
I'm watching this and thinking, Hmmmm, it is 17 ° F outside here mid day. The coldest I can ever remember around this time of year, in fact it is a new record. He is saying global temps are rising? How did that get missed here?
By the time CFC's we're identified as a problem their patents had expired. Manufacturing had shifted from the big chemical companies to small low cost/low profit companies. The politically powerful big companies had no interest in keeping CFC's and the small manufacturers had no political power. A shift to the new type of refrigerant, HFC's, would be profitable for the big, politically powerful companies. This is how there was the political impetus to switch. Now that HFC's have been identified as greenhouse gasses, and their patent protection has expired, the big, politically powerful manufacturers have new (profitable) refrigerants to replace them. Don't expect there to be the political will to do significant change from hydrocarbons to renewables until the politically powerful can make profit.
Funny how every refrigerant was fine until the patents expired..?
Karla Berger, we mainly used 2 refrigerants in the USAfrom the early 1950s until the early 1990s (replacing methyl methanoate, a highly flammable and poisonous compound), R12 A.K.A. dichlorodifluoromethane (used in automobiles and refrigerators mainly) and R22 A.K.A Chlorodifluoromethane, (used in household and commercial AC units mainly and in aerosol cans as the propellant), there were other refrigerants and other uses but those were the main culprits for CFC in the refrigerant industry in the USA, they were mainly used because they were relatively safe for consumers (being non flammable) and cheap to manufacture. They were replaced with more costly and generally extremely flammable volatile hydrocarbons, typically propane, n-butane and isobutane. Dimethyl ether (DME) and methyl ethyl ether are also used which ironically emit just as much Co² as CFC's did (unlike what Trace clams in this clearly left leaning libtarded video) because they are literally hydrocarbon molecular chains. Gary is right the patients on R12 and R22 "Freon" which is a DuPont brand names not an actual gas name (as I wrote the names of above) ran out decades ago. Free market enterprise economy creates jobs and technology you can see this today as DuPont is phasing out R134 tetrafluoroethane for Tetrafluoropropene HFO 1234yf because it s lower in CO² production and has a valid patent. It has nothing to do with the Paris climate agreement that we are no longer part of but a better "freon" that makes less CO² emissions, that everyone in the world will have to buy off of DuPont to meet these unrealistic climate goals (that I will bet money not a single large economy nation [France, Germany are examples] will be able to meet, but that is opinion not fact).
@@oilsandmore yes this was precisely why DuPont did this. To force everyone to buy their new product.
*THE SUN IS A DEADLY LAZER*
Lol
we must destroy the sun then!
*not anymore there is a blanket*
*Never mind the blanket is gone*
True. That's why we need an ozone blanket 😂
"i think death is impossible" *starts ignoring people who are dying*
SlothInSpace OTHERS will die. You just never will
Maybe if you just nurtured a relationship with a cfc instead of just hooking up with it and throwing it away when the first UV ray comes along, maybe they wouldn't feel the need to tear molecular families apart, hm? Upper atmospheric hookup culture is to blame!
New Message this made my day
New Message reply me so I can have a laugh
New Message cute. But amophasizing a cfc doesn't help the problem.
Neither does stepping on every joke you see.. but keep it up. Everybody loves 'THAT GUY'. You must get invited to all the best parties.
M8, he wasn't _amophasizing_ shit.
Nice bashing on a certain person without naming it.
donald trump dosent care about science nor the planet in any way whatsoever. thats a valid reason for bashing him.
vincent schuurhof This is how he works. Controversial guy who's all about the business
President Trump also doesn't care about arts, he just massively defunded them. Oh shit, now they will now need to provide content that is worthy of donations and is not funded by force. Oh shit, now they will need to improve themselves and make more interesting content than lazy rehashed uninteresting brainded propaganda. What a fucking tragedy
Trump is a hick and a scumbag who believes in pseudoscience made by oil companies.
If the shoe fits...
that's why i believe that we need a reality clause : if a politician holds a position that contradicts scientific facts and makes policy based on those opinions then that politician should be kicked out of office regardless of the office they hold
That sounds problematic, though, as it's open to abuse. It's our responsibility not to vote a candidate that distrusts science.
Even now, there are scientists that is paid to research an (probably fake) evidence of the absence of global warming. When your clause is implemented, this illegal activity will only increase.
Humans had to be convinced the hard way the sewage and drinking water don't mix, not surprising that those events had to take place.
This is why im not ultimately too worried. Cause if history has taught us anything, it's that humans have a history of getting their shit together when it hits the fan. Should it be that way? Probably not, but hey it is what it is.
InMaTeofDeath in most of the third world people are still struggling with this
and the dangers of lead, over and over and over again
well explained as always.......keep it up
That glasses looks good on you
Tech Era
I can finally distinguish him from Mark Ruffalo 🤣
The hair doesn't
Wait for Trace’s Next Sponsor,
Hes going to be like Curious Droid.
“These Frames were brought to you by ...”
Jack lack headass
Those*
I love this guy, he always makes science ten times more interesting plus he's funny af. Unlike the others they're boring and they can't keep my attention on them.
Totally true
Thumbed downed this so hard
The last time anyone on seeker was funny was anal hair
What did he say that was so funny?
There are already electric planes.
they kinda suck atm tho and planes dont really pollute all that much. focusing on cars and power plants is probably the better choice atm
Did you actually read the Paris Agreement and how specific it is one why the US is the only one being told to pay for the aid on the agreement while China and India specifically don’t have to deal with paying their part with less consequences? If this agreement is a benefit to all nations, why is it that only the US is to pay for the research and development of plans to reduce CO2 emissions? And don’t give me that because we’re the riches country argument, if this is a joint effort, US shouldn’t be paying for this alone. That’s why we stepped out of the agreement because it wasn’t a fair agreement.
Never understood why science is political.
It's not.
It’s not. Retards in America make it political
Sciencie is not political. But the only ones who have the power to stop climate change are the ones who rule.
Corporations. That's why. Corporations fund both politicians and surveys.
That's why i don't buy into the whole "petrol cars are bad, electric cars are good but 5 times more expensive".
Give me a break, if they really care about environment they would invest in public transportation and walking or riding bikes.
Same as "meat is bad, so you should buy this vegan product that costs 10 times more".
It takes money to produce scientific research. Politicians want to control money. That’s why.
Just think about AIDS research.
Net neutrality
Nitish Anand what
seeker should make a video about Net neutrality
*Nut neutrality*
The gamer with a bad Name
🅱️UT 🅱️UETRALITY
+Kard Gamer tryhard
How does my deadly farts affect the Ozone Layer?
need a quick critical answer, because we might be in danger, should I conserve it...
Mr. Omen just hold it in till you splode
Unless you're farting out complex chlorine molecules, you should be fine to let her rip. Don't drink bleach.
"Contributing to the problem"
But not causing the problem. Got it.
VIVE MONTREAL TABARNACK
patdus11 mdr jpensais la meme chose 😂
Ahaha
02:42
And here we have 3 Molecules of Ozone in the Fidget Spinner Configuration...
If I watch CZcams videos til 6 to 7 am do I have a problem? I mean sleeping wise as long as I get 8 to 9 hours I feel perfectly fine. I don't get tired no signs at all. I do feel my brain gravitating towards entertainment but I'm not seeing any negative signs.
Danielmeir what a random comment
Too much to learn,
Not enough night to do it all.
When you start to hear the birds chirping thats when you’re in trouble.
Danielmeir . You'll be fine.
time is all you make it to be
Not good. Trust me. It seems like Phase Delay Syndrome, and it can be devastating. Try going to bed and waking up slightly earlier each day
Noooooo!
The sun is a deadly lazer
Not anymore there's a blanket!
Seeker was doomed, until Dnews stepped away from power.
Catwow they were actually doomed when they told Hitler is famous in India. Then survived by making video on indian economy
Keith Durant they did mention tht Hitler ideology is vastly followed. But truth is hardly anybody know who the guy is.
I think the government should allow scientists to observe and research every companies new product, and if it’s dangerous to the environment, it’s not allowed to be produced.
And then what? You create a big and onipotent monopoly!! Great!! And what more? Huh what more? You rise prices because now every product is being under study! Not to mention the lack of liberty as now the government has the right to intervenue with private businesses! And the cherry on the cake: We'll have nothing being allowed to produce at all because every single atom has to come from somewhere, and that somewhere will always be nature! Great, you're a genius!
This is totally
True news.
Fake News with zero backing empirical evidence that can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that we had any affect on the ozone layer. Nothing more than a click bait title and a man rambling off some quasi intellectual scientific observations without ever reaching a true conclusion that backs the click bait title. The willfully ignorant are the only idiots that consider this tabloid fake news video to have any merit. LOL
Whatever helps you sleep at night, flat earther.
You're a complete idiot. You are the flat earther. If Seeker told you the earth was flat you are the sort of idiotic sheep that would accept it as fact. It's called science and research kid try it some time instead of being a willfully ignorant sheep with no argument aside from childish insults like calling people flat earthers.
Care to cite the science and research you claim disproves climate change? Or are you just interested in using childish insults?
Climate change is a process that has occurred over billions of years since the earth came into existence. I think you are confused no one has ever made that claim nor did I child.
Your weak non argument sidestepping and attempts at mental gymnastics to get around the fact that there is zero provable evidence beyond a shadow of a doubt that humans have repaired the ozone layer or damaged the ozone layer is laughable.
The burden of proof is always upon the party or person making the claims, so therefore unless you can right now create a perfect emulation of our planet in a global sized experiment that spans decades to the stretch of centuries which can provide viable empirical evidence to even remotely prove any negligible amount of gases from human activity were some how magically able to damage the ozone layer or lack there of these insignificant amounts of gases were able to reverse a hole in the ozone layer and repair it over the span of several decades directly caused by human activity despite volcanic activity ( i.e. natural causes) being the major contributing factor with humans having over the past 250 years contributed just one part of CO2 in 10,000 to the atmosphere. One volcanic cough can do this in a day. That's 0.01% percentile or 1/10,000 for human gas contribution in CO2. If your simple mind can comprehend all this then come back and talk to me.
You have no argument.
_We actually fixed it with legislation_
Push X to doubt.
Someone please send this vid to "biff" a.k.a. president Trump
tar pit why are you such a hateful individual
what?
Aro Man, what is hateful? The character Biff from Back to the Future was based on Donald Trump www.theguardian.com/film/2015/oct/23/back-to-the-future-writer-bad-guy-biff-was-based-on-donald-trump .
tar pit he does look like a bully from the 80s. Lolol
I wasn't trying to be malicious.....just a harmless joke guys
Counter point emissions in the u.s. are decreasing mostly from factories closing not regulations.
Today we have the same issue with the meat industry denying that their production is devastating towards the envirnoment.
Who are denying it? In Denmark we are well aware of this issue but it's a very tough issue to tackle.
im pretty everyone knows meat is bad for the enviroment. its just that people eat meat anyway.
i only buy meat when its about to expire in the supermarket 20 min before the store closes. but im sure that still counts as supporting the meat industry.
Everyone knows this and its a issue tht is near impossible to solve without decades of easing it in. Without meat then we will an even worse epidemic of hunger. So will we stop making meat at the expense of killing off a good portion of our population or will we continue producing meat at the expense of the environment? Either option is bad with the latter being the lesser of 2 evils but ppl are naturally scared of death bc we're animals too (instincts), so we wuld end up choosing the former. So pretty much nothing we can do b4 the point of no return comes.
Ha! Teachers in our country still tell kids that the ozone Layer is getting thinner. The problem with teachers is that once they learn their education they stick with that knowledge and then transfer that knowledge to their pupils in school.
I did a report on this in high school... 15 years ago
I love how he called the US out for pulling out of the Paris Agreement
huh look at that. A seeker video that ends on a hopeful note, will wonders never cease?
All we need to make everyone take the environment seriously is to create and spam more Earth Chan memes! People respect Earth Chan’s wishes.
Now we just have eliminate benzene and nitrous oxides - that'll be when electric vehicles become predominant.
kd1s ...and how long do you want to wait for that?
LOL
Well I give it 10 to 20 years before internal combustion engines disappear.
kd1s I hope you're right.
Has anyone seen any coverage of this topic on north pole?
All I was able to find was "ozone hole over south pole".
Seriously, the passive-aggressive tone referring to America is just petty and annoying. If you want to single something out, just do it outright, it makes you sound less of an ass.
I'm not disagreeing or trying to be controversial, just please be direct in implications, not falsely subtle. When you do that, but it's a subject on which everyone is immediately clear on what you're talking about, it's not clever, it just sounds boorish.
Micah Philson tbh I really wanted to like the video, but these references to the US really annoyed me.
It kinda sounds childish, if you ask me.
Kemo III Its not childish its true. Rhetoric at its finest
If he had said it outright , you'd still complain.
If he had said it outright... he would have stated the fact that the US didn't want to sign on. That's a thing that happened.
By pretending to be subtle about it, he just sounds like a kid on a playground pretending not to directly talk about someone behind their back, and just comes off pretentious and dickish.
Rhetoric at its finest? So pretending you're not directly talking about someone behind their back like a kid on a playground instead of just plainly stating that a country didn't sign an agreement is rhetoric at its finest?
Aristotle sure would be proud, huh?
why is the ozone whole over atarctica while the CFC & HFCs are emitted up north?
Wow, the things we can achieve together
Moamin Aljaro take a closer look at what happened. Hint: this has nothing to do with politics or the Montreal protocol.
Ozone is the smell of electrical equipment, especially high powered radio transmitters. 0zone is so rare, that we could produce enough to replace it. If we are concerned about carbon dioxide levels and global warming, we need to adopt LFTR. Check it out on the internet.
The how ozone layer is made, I want to know about it. Buddy
pandya ravi wut
pandya ravi O2---by the action of uv------->O+O
O2+O------->O3
THEN ALL THESE OZONE MOLECULES FORM A GROUP AND EVENTUALLY A BARRIER
"Can you image that happening now?" It's pathetic how this is an legit question.
Why the hole in the Ozon layer is only at the poles........why not anywhere over the glob.......
Abinash Pal ozone is thinner at the likes
Don't post skeptic comments if you can't say it right
Because it's a fraud. The holes are natural to Earth and fluctuate as the Earth spins. We all want to love our planet but be careful, many people are making money off this love and use words to tug on your heart like, MAYBE, MIGHT, COULD and IF... These are trick words to manipulate people who do not think but follow because of love.
GenX Autrucity
We got another one.
The truth is that Dupont's patent was going to expire. They pushed the ozone narrative. Ever since the 80's band they have produced an alternative product. They now make even more profit.
Aaaaaand now we're going back the other way because pretty much every country is pulling out.
LycanDragon the other is in a civil war
Takemikazuchi still somehow he still got her pregnant....
LycanDragon classic american citizen that think his country is the only one out there and they are the center of the universe
Even North Korea! North Korea dude. they even join the paris agreement.
Muhammad Hadrami ikr, North Korea and South Korea finally have a same thinking!
there should be an agreement on all kind of nonbiodegradable polymers.the one that manufactures the polymer should cut out on their profit to recover atleast 80% of it's manufactured polymers.
You could mention the way in which ozone captures UV-light, but it'd probably screw your smartass "politicians i'm not daring to address by name are ruining the atmosphere, because they can"-routine.
For those of you who skipped chemistry for sociology -- ozone is an unstable substance, that created when a loose oxygen atom meets O2 molecule with consumption of a UV-photon, after some time it breaks down to O + O2 with extra energy dissipating as a heat. Yep chlorine is affecting this balance, but more air is UV-exposed the more ozone is created.
Perhaps you shouldn't have left out an ozone 'hole' is one in which a region of ozone falls below 220 dobson units. Naturally ozone levels drop above this threshold in polar winters when no Sun is shinning on that region. Due to ODSs ozone levels continue to drop past the 220 DU threshold forming a 'hole'. If you want to call out others on their science you better make sure to get yours correct.
And he didn't want to take a stance in his video by bagging trump openly. He just wanted to state facts
The main problem is the people dont understand how those adversarial actions affect the environment and only take notice when the whole world is almost doom.
Can't I just watch a damn you tube video without Trump being "mentioned".
Crimson King you can’t ignore the fact that one of the biggest greenhouse emitting countries aren’t signed in because of Trump. He is literally the reason we aren’t in. It’s not a surprise and they aren’t at fault for “mentioning” him
Hopefully max in three years, you can...
Trump wasn't mentioned in any way unless I might be wrong which can be the case
I know right? And I was also thinking that there are also many cases that go unmentioned where flimsy evidence is actually flimsy.
Crimson King America an epitome racism and a False self made perception of the word great.
when you said CFC and aerosol cans I thought about the DuPont Monopoly in patents there's reasons why there is not an ozone in the Southern and Northern hemispheres of this planet you do need sunlight to create naturally occurring ozone. but I forgot the world was flat in the sun's always there because we're stuck under the dome maybe that's the reason. For god sakes how come we don't pay carbon tax we could have saved the planet by now raise those taxes save the planet.
Keep politics out ur doing the right thing dont want to lose viewers plus better to have an open mind
this isnt about fucking politics. climate change has nothing to do with politics
vincent schuurhof he was praising him for not being political about global warming. Global warming by itself isn't political but the disagreements behind it is.
Tom Martin science isn’t political.
So this is why you need a hvac license to recycle refrigerant reefers.
It _does_ sound familiar. It's the same thing that is happening _right now_ with *animal agriculture* -- the largest human-made environmental catastrophe in the history of our species, very well known, and virtually not talked about.
#govegan
well in about 30-40 years we can make meat from cells instead of animals.
does that count as vegan?
Purple Turtle you don't even have to kill nor use animals tale a couple hundred cells and you can make indefinitely meat with no deaths, isn't that your dream as vegans?
As if in the history of the Earth there has never been a period where organisms created more methane or carbon dihidroxyde than we have today?
I don't know, and I doubt anyone does. From quick Google searches I've read that the percentage of C2O in the captured (frozen air) was the same as today.
Global warming is a scam. It's just corporations invested in batteries and solar panels, and now they need someone to buy them.
Same with food. Corporations need consumers for their overpriced "vegan/gluten free" food.
jack ripper Nahh. You’re missing the details bro. Take the level of CO2 over the previous decades and you’ll see a massive spike. That’s what’s causing the big discussion on climate change. As for the vegan/gluten part I feel going vegetarian wouldn’t hurt. Plus gluten is bad for you :/
*NET NEUTRALITY STOPS*
wow,.,,you even lie about ozone...and the hole...pure propaganda.
reverend moonie by hole they mean heavily weaken ozone in the area. So it looks like a hole when ya see it from those graphs
I appreciate the message tacit and overt. Question though: Why is "refrigerant management" listed in "Drawdown" (edited by Paul Hawken) as the #1 solution to climate change? It sounded from this video as if Montreal Protocol had, at least to some degree, dealt with that.
tell that to china
China has 1,3 billion people and the US has 300 million... Still the US is emitting more than half the amount carbon dioxide that China is. The only problem at this point is the US and the stupid people who live there.
It's actually the u.s.a
FYI, US is short for United States.
and china is pulling a huge effort to fight global warming: reforestation on a massive scale (they will reach the 2030 target in 2020), its now the largest producer of solar power , the only nation focused on developing Thorium MSR ...and the list goes on
Salim Zwein and don't forget areas like Tibet and east Turkestan that have beautiful wildlife and are virtually untouched
Hopefully animal agriculture will be regulated/reduced! Less meat, less heat fellas!
Trump 2020!!!
wishful thinking!
Embarrassingly, yeah. Trump wins 2020. Seriously Dems, get your sh** together.
Difference that was good science back then but now you have scientists fudging the numbers just like pollsters lol
Why are you always wear glasses when you discuss science are you trying to look smart?😂😂
cabdimalik ali maybe because he needs them?
I have a question (and correct me if I'm wrong I don't know much about this). Can't we just produce Ozone, fly up and fill the stratosphere with it
first
I JUST LIKE TO SAY FIRST I KNOW THERES NO REASON
it sounds like we have to do this if we want to protect our ozone, dunno why this is debatable, if we have to phase out specific chemicals thats just what we have to adjust to.
The 70's seems to have been the last time the USA had something approaching government for the people. Reagan's 'new morning in America' brought deregulation, the decline of journalism, and Milton Friedman's failed neoliberal economics. It was not a dawn but twilight.
These problems existed for years. Every country is responsible. The USA is already leading the world on emission cuts. However, one country should not be paying others to cut back on pollution.
Banning refrigeration gases always takes a while. There's been R22 and R23 about 15-20yrs ago, those were the 2 main gases used. A lot of countries agreed on getting rid of it because of their devastating effect on the ozone layer, but for another 5 to 10 years you were allowed to refill it in already existing systems but not to use fill new ones with it. After that period of time you had to change gases and for that you had to change the sealing gasket where it was possible (solenoid valves for example) otherwise it would happen pretty fast for those gaskets to get a leakage. But even changing the sealing gaskets wasn't the solution. Still most of the system where they were changed were leaking after months or a few years.
Same thing is now happening with R404a. The prices already rose extraordinarily high this year. However there are more more systems (especially supermarkets) built containing R744 as a refrigerant, which is nothing else but CO2 and not as bad for the enivronment as the other gases. For example 3kg R404 has a CO2 equivalent of 11 metric tons of CO2.
However CO2 is running with a much higher pressure which makes construction costs higher due to more safety devices required like gas warners in cold rooms, high pressure release valves on every compressor, thicker copper tubes and so on. Cause yeah, you dont normally run above 30bars with 1,5mm wall thickness of the tube. For higher pressures you use a thicker tube and the high pressure required isn't to joke with. On the suction side you have around 25 bars compared to 2 bars with R404a (depends on the required suction gas temp, the deeper you want your temperatur the less of pressure you have).
Half the world is still using R 12. There is no ban. The ozone hole is all bullshit like global warming
3:13 - 3:20 is perfection. I don't know if Amy and Julian wrote that in or if that was all Trace but I love whoever was responsible for it.
Government all over the world should make rule to plant at least one tree or small plant in each an every home .this will lead control temperature growth
"If you didn't see the problem, there isn't one"
Can you please discuss methanes effect on the ozone v Co2's effect. I've heard methane is 3 times more devestating and that cattle are the main contributors and that they're doing more damage than all vehicle emmisions combined. Could this be right?
Why they didn’t put a law that if a country uses these chemicals have to pay a lot of TAXES a lot so that the country will go to a economic crisis
I think Trac wears glasses to look more intelligent. I've seen him wear contacts before too so I think that it's just marketing.
Was tons spelled “tonnes” in the video?
joshua bonnell yeah that's the other way of spelling it
Landen Nipper thanks
lol
The difference between American spelling and the rest of the world
The Paris Agreement wanted literally a trillion dollars.
The o zone layer. Did we all forget?
Did it boost our destructive confidence?
One C.F.C molecule kill 100,000 Ozone Layer molecules. C.F.Cs have a life span of between 50-100 years.
Well perhaps the threat of GW is seemingly less real, especially to many in richer nations. The threat of contracting skin cancer from just being out in the sun on the other hand, seems to be far more universal, terrifying and immediate than the prospects of creeping shorelines.
Calling it now, Trace is going to get a Glasses Sponsor
Just like Curious Droid and the shirts.
Glad the ozone layer is healing so well
how it all happened..
*World starts ending*
Industry: "It's not our fault"
*Science proves industry is to blame, Vienna Conventions passed*
Industry: "Fine we'll sign it, but you have to reimburse our lost income."
Trace's irony best irony
Antarctic Treaty is the most important thing done to protect our planet!
Just because the hole is gone doesn't mean anything if the Ozone just got thinner to make that happen
So leaving the Paris agreement, is pretty much for big companies to do whatever they want. Creating more factories is more jobs, but at the expense for a healthy planet for future generations. The only ppl to blame is yourself america.
The reason the Montreal protocol worked so well, was because it was a binding contract, which is why the Paris Agreement doesn't mean that much. If we could get countries to sign a binding Climate Change agreement, we could actually make a difference.
That was a cheap shot at the current administration, and the paris agreement is a bad deal for the U.S.. Just look at the many details that it would require us to perform while many other countries would have to do little to nothing.
Do you still do podcasts?
I'm watching this and thinking, Hmmmm, it is 17 ° F outside here mid day. The coldest I can ever remember around this time of year, in fact it is a new record. He is saying global temps are rising? How did that get missed here?
Nitrous Oxide is now the problem and the protocol doesn't go far enough to repair the Ozone
what effects would there be if the ozone molecules increase 100 fold ?
Glory to Mankind.
Could we do it today? We're screwed.
Its nice to see a video which shows how humans have actually made improvements to this, instead of another video saying how we're fucked...
Definitive proof that man CAN affect the planet earth.... both unintentionally AND intentionally.
Subtle but incisive. I appreciate this video.
Now I know what Mark Ruffalo does when he is not filming movies...
Thought this video was old. Saw a comment with one hour ago. You make great content
All life on Earth is coming to an end due to the Ozone Layer Depletion.
I like that you trusted us enough to be able to read things on the screen while listening to different information. (y)
why did they use chemicals for air cooling, why can't we use compressed air
How much of a role did atmospheric nuclear testing play in ozone depletion?