Dr.Nimer you are an excellent teacher, plz continue uploading your videos wherein you simplify the most complex concepts in syntax. You are a GOD gifted teacher. May you live long and happy!
Nice ! Sir what about the grammatically of the sentence when we take the whole NP as indexation. In previous lecture we learnt that whole NP"Mary's mother " couldn't be used as antecedent to the "anaphora" herself.
I see how this works in a very elegant way. But the explanation for why herself cannot refer back to Mary's seems to be that a reflexive pronoun or anaphora can only refer to the whole subject and since Mary's is only a subpart of the subject it cannot satisfy this restriction. Why would one create a theory to schematize the rule in this abstract way?
![[柴犬ASMR]曼玉Manyu&小白Bai 毛发护理Spa asmr](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/0TsXQ7z2Dh4/mqdefault.jpg)
Dr.Nimer you are an excellent teacher, plz continue uploading your videos wherein you simplify the most complex concepts in syntax. You are a GOD gifted teacher. May you live long and happy!
Sir, you’re just awesome,,,,,,,,you cover everything & leave nothing unclear❤️
Really interesting. I got it with the least effort. Much appreciated Professor.
What an excellent professor
I wish I had a prodessor like you
Ours just make things look complex and boring
This really helped me with my assignment thank youuu!!
. that is clear thank you so so so much . I get a very good degree in school because of you . thank you
your video is so helpful! thank you!!
Thank you, this playlist was really helpful!
you are the best sir😊
Thank u sm ❤
Nice !
Sir what about the grammatically of the sentence when we take the whole NP as indexation. In previous lecture we learnt that whole NP"Mary's mother " couldn't be used as antecedent to the "anaphora" herself.
Thank you very much ,Sir
why the bar level has been removed from the x bar tree
???
thank you sir
I see how this works in a very elegant way. But the explanation for why herself cannot refer back to Mary's seems to be that a reflexive pronoun or anaphora can only refer to the whole subject and since Mary's is only a subpart of the subject it cannot satisfy this restriction. Why would one create a theory to schematize the rule in this abstract way?