@Great White Evidence? It's widely accepted that proving anything is an impossibility. We can find evidence that points towards a conclusion to a theory, but scientific proof is a myth. Everything we know in our world today was once a theory or logical argument that mathematicians and the like set out to prove. The reality is, given the math, the probability that we are in a base reality (i.e. not in a simulation) is 1 in a billion. This is mathematical "evidence" that points towards the validity of the Simulation Argument to which said argument hasn't yet been logically dis-proven. It doesn't mean it's true, but it means that the likelihood that we are in a simulation is very high. You know what we also don't have your "proof" for yet? Quantum gravity, dark matter, and a whole lot more things. Do you think it's "irresponsible" for scientists to work on those "hoaxes"?
If this is a simulation I believe it would not be a "video game" I think maybe the simulators put in specific rules and code in the beginning of the universe and they let it run it's course. They don't make every little piece of the simulation, the science did. We did.
But there are probably way more video games made than history simulations. So by the same logic as us being more likely to be in a simulation than reality, we'd be more likely to be in a video game than a universe history simulation. Besides, we don't know what the video game is about. Maybe it's like Spore. Or maybe it's something that has nothing to do with us and we're just some npcs out in the middle of nowhere space, and the main story takes place elsewhere. Or maybe the players are stars (literal ones). It doesn't have to be so simple as to just be the sims or to have the players be world leaders or something.
absolutely nothing happens, we’re not that advanced to actually have proof of the simulation theory so people will continue to pass it off as nonsense and eventually forgot about it.
Trust your own intuition, and don't let anyone tell you what to believe. There are a lot of people on this earth who don't believe in anything beyond the physical because it's beyond their ability to do so, and they will at every turn try to keep you stuck in their ignorance. Raise your vibration, raise your consciousness and open your mind!
Well said Astrum, it literally took me 23 to understand that consciousness and vibration is 100% real, despite people thinking it's psuedo shit, it's just science that hasn't become science yet. Was literally getting controlled left and right because my ideals were too solidified and isn't even realise it. For anyone reading this it may not make sense right now but It's possible to escape different layers to this shit.
Luminous B I understand stood this message because I have evolved, and raised my consciousness. It’s a beautiful journey, hope you have a great day my friend 🙏🏼💫
His way of explaining it would make a child understand it. It's obvious when it comes to boundaries and a species curiosity to break rules and work around it. Scientifically possible. Hence he can't argue against the idea. Very plausible until proven otherwise.
oonga boonga, you clearly wanna look like a programmed NPC by this comment and yes, earth is flat and we live in an electromagnetic field , beyond the organical membrane there are other dimensions and YES, space program is about contacting with the correct frequency of vibrations, operation High Jump, Wolfenstein 2009 (videogame) , Singularity , you know about real science ? NO i see u ignorant, go watch what admiral Byrd described when he descended Earth with a crystal cube used by the ancient civilization he met there, Yes, pyramids in the antartic lands connect different simulators/realms from others
Well, there is an argument against the "simulation" conjecture. It's called Occam's Razor which is an important part of science. The idea is that if you are looking for an explanation for something, you should look for the simplest one able to account for all the facts. The reason is that the more unnecessarily complex it gets, the less probable it is the actual explanation. Here's why: Sometimes laws or rules that a universe follows are actually constraints on what can happen. Put in too many (complicate it too much that way) and you can constrain your reality out of existence (your model can't explain your universe). Other times, you might make so many things possible, in trying to be able to explain everything, that the amount of significantly different universes your model allows may be so immensely huge that the probability that it actually corresponds to your universe is infinitely small. Even more, that idea is related to a part of Physics called Thermodynamics, which explains why when you mix, say, water and sugar, the dissolved sugar never, on it's own, separates from the water again to form solid sugar crystals: A "state" is where each molecule is, how it's oriented, and what it's doing (rotating quickly in this direction, this part vibrating slowly, going quickly towards the right...) When you give the water and sugar the freedom of mixing, it opens up so immensely more actually possible sugar mixed with water states than there are possible sugar separate from water states that there is simply no significant chance that by random motion and change the sugar and water will reach a "being separate" state again. A "too free" model of the Universe will not give you your universe, but rather one of a much larger group. The "simulation" explanation seems to me as one of the latter, because while a simulation (purportedly "our universe") has to be simpler than the actual universe in which it is made, else it would not be computable, here the "actual universe" in this scenario would be a free for all of anything. Furthermore, this idea shouldn't make you lose sleep because even if you were in a simulation, as long as all those to which we relate are in the same and we are all truly sentient (conscious) and mortal, our relationships are real and an abrupt end to the simulation would simply be our turn to die. Additionally, it is questionable we even need to be truly conscious, as Bhuddists see ourselves as machines made of smaller parts, and if the parts are not conscious, there is no reason to think the whole is, so we only experience the illusion of consciousness. And yet they live their lives. As a final measure, you might also want to apply the "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" criterion -emphasis on "reasonable"-. Now, does that simulation idea hit you as reasonable, versus our understanding of a coherent, law abiding universe? Which brings us back to Occam's razor.
Based on the incredible size of the universe, and how much of it we know is empty, and without life -- it seems improbable that much waste would be created in a simulation.
What if taking psychedelics lets us peep through the system. The so called "Trippy visuals" Is really just glitches.😳 Alot of people including me see geometric patterns and feel like their in a CGI animation.
Noooo I'm scared!!!!!!!!! There's too many coincidences that happen in my life and now I'm actually believing this Nani Nanda korowua help mee nanai naoanankajanes kanai so no rostu koruwas orqed nananananananan
Food for thought...when you through the dart are you throwing the dart from a stimulated world? When you are looking into this ripple down effect are you looking from reality into stimulation or from stimulation look on to other stimulations? Someone to say life is stimulated, the statement itself would have to come from stimulated mind so why should I believe that then...
Characters in a game dont think for themselves we do thats the difference were not a simulation also games are full if glitches ive never seen the planet randomly go pixelated or someone get stuck in a wall like a computer game character some people are crazy
In the eleventh canto of "Srimad-Bhagavatam", Krishna says to Uddhava that the gross and subtle forms of material bodies have no existence of their own; they are only temporary patterns manifested by the eternally existing reality, the Absolute Truth. -Hindu Holy Book
@1:35 👀💀 Oooo Neil told her!! LoL 🤣😂 "The Universe is under NO obligation to make sense to you" I cannot wait to use this line myself! I will give credit where credit is due, of course.
Well, neil lemme tell you this, since we curently can't simulate life, we are either the real univers or we are the ones in the very front of simulated universes. So its a 50/50 chance
I often cite love or any emotion for that matter, but I like to pick to on love, because people around the world put so much onus on this word love and all its intention and meaning as it being this higher all conquering thing, well bad news its not, if this world was real, and love was real with it, then our entire collective thoughts as to what love is, would be universal, and indeed all conquering, I am willing to bet however that as there are drugs (prescribed or otherwise but mostly in this case prescribed) in existance that can kill off lust (just look at how chemical castration works) then I am willing to bet that there is a drug or combination of drugs out there than can kill off love, there are people born into this world without the ability to love, there are people in this world who are born with all the normal things in life, and who are able to love and then some accident befalls them and they are left unable to love, if you take a child and instead of expressing love to them in their growing up, but instead lock them in a room and deprive them of love, they will grow up not able to express it, and remember I am only saying that we put this big thing on what love is, and its so called ability to conquer all, but it doesnt, and people through such things in life follow a path determined by their experiences.... I was run over by a car when I was 2, suffered a number of injuries one them being massive brain trauma and yet you wouldnt know that I had to look at me today at 43years old, I am just an average person, but speak to me at length and you realise that I couldnt give a shit about love, and its not that I dont believe in it, I know love is not a real or tangable thing, like how you might know 1 + 1 = 2, and then at 4 years old I endured child abuse until the day after I turned 11 years old and was taken into care, the damage however has been done, and then 3 years or so of false promises by various women has meant that whatever might have been salvagable after being run over, or after the child abuse or after being treated like shit through various relationships with women has led me to a logical thought path of trying to figure out what love is, and I am damn sure its nothing more than a chemical inbalance within the brain (sure its one we might like the feeling of now and then) but nonetheless it seems to follow the routes that other chemical inbalances take, and as such I am sure there is a drug out there than can kill it, within even the most ardent of persons who are all for love. I say all of this because if love was a real thing, then it would persist within all of us, but it doesnt, damage the code of some program enough with a virus and you break the program, damage enough of a person and you break their code and you then break that person, its a known punishment tactic... its known because its all coded, its all logical, there's nothing hidden about it.... it does indeed therefore seem like we are part of some fucking simulation, and one im tired of.
So, so many holes in your statement. First being that you put a definite meaning to "love" which is entirely subjective. It not being real to you doesn't mean it isn't "real". Your entire argument stands on a very particular definition to love but in reality there is none. You can ask a multitude of people what love is and what is encompassed in it and you'll get an entire spectrum of answers and experiences. Why? Because love is something we "feel" and inherently taught as well so there is no "universal" definition for it and thus it cannot be something that "conquers all". Hell that very statement can be a a hyperbole to some (maybe yourself included) but that undermines real stories of people overcoming life altering obstacle through love. It seems like your talking the movie stereotype of what love is and what it does quite literally, which begs me to question your statement as a whole if you can't differentiate a medium trying to make money off of people's pathos and what love is at it's core. That being said you also mentioned being able to feel "love" through an outside medium such as drugs but in that instance your taking love to be something closer to a mental byproduct rather than a mutual experience and condition. Finally what in the world does this have to do with living in a simulation? Love like anything else is something that can die and leave you if you're not in a good condition. The argument of love's existence should mean everything should be perfect or at least close to it is nonsensical. There's too many factors in this world that make it what it is to say something like that. That being said living in a simulation could be possibility simply due to the fact that there is no way of knowing if we were in one.
@@BHALT0S You're one of those, huh? 40+ and dense asf. It's fucking CZcams but if want info research it yourself ffs. No way you're getting anything legit off a comment data wise. Everything you said was more rooted in assumptions, more so than what I said, so if anything YOU show me some legit links.
So am I real or am I not? Is all this pain and suffering I have gone through just bits on a computer? If we are in a simulation, are we in a Matrix or are we self-aware computer programs?
VisualTam maybe when we dream is the only time we escape the simulation, that’s why drugs are illegal because it’s like dreaming awake or temporarily escaping the simulation
My question is very basic and stupid If we r being played like a video game by someone something or whatever Whats the point? This game on earth seems to be very ugly to be played with right? Who wd be delighted to play our game? As a kid I played a video game super mario.. Mentally at that small age.. I had a little fun but if we the people having these physical bodies that go thru pain misery and all that.. Who will get pleasure or fun out of this game? Nobody is that evil In a video game characters have no existence of their own ..untill we connect the video game and start playing..those characters cannot laugh cry talk of their own do not fall ill or do not get cured obviously So ..why do we gave pain and all jf we r just being played
There is one question I have? Who created the first computer system for the simulation(s) to take place... God is the only answer my limited 3 pound brain can conclude!
Why do they try to make it look so stupid? Like they're actually smarter than him or understand the basis of how physics works seriously? Why are they being so weird and fake.
Zainal Azrul , the universe is made up of tiny atoms which consists of tinier electronic particles that spins around each other all the time, watch “double-slit experiment”. What is holding you back in understanding is the lack of knowledge. Just saying...
Someone programmed the universe. Can be a 14-year-old playing us as different characters in his video game. But there is no possibility of an intelligent creator? Just because he also sets some rules for the game. Classic atheist logic.
BuT wE’rE 3-0 wOu I’m just stating what he believes idiot. I don’t believe this theory but it’s interesting nonetheless. Anyways I got a question for you. Why believe in god and the bible. All you see is words and promises from people thousands of years ago.
Bro I wish you knew how we looked at you, Tyson, and all those other "pseudo scientists", including Einstein, and Nickola Tesla, before the hype, you'd be amazing. It's like a main character looking at Npcs.
Luminous B Einstein and Tesla were actual scientists whereas Neil deGrasse Tyson manages a planetarium. He also spouts unscientific nonsense to try to get the dumb masses (you) interested in science.
dkgatlin There’s always a random no avatar conspiracy theorist in the comments section of these types of videos, accusing Tyson of being a “bad” scientist and thinking anyone who follows him is “dumb” Yet there’s no evidence supporting this. If you have some sources that are outside of your conspiracy theory websites I’d love to have a look.
LogRoll yes, I believe in the wild conspiracy theory that we’re not living in a computer simulation. Please direct me to some of these conspiracy websites where wild eyed crazies think we should be skeptical of claims made by pop scientists that aren’t based on anything but faulty statistics and aren’t observable or falsifiable.
dkgatlin I never said anything about us living in a simulation. I’m asking for evidence that Tyson isn’t an “actual” scientist. If you can’t answer that but rather you ignore that and proceed to ask me a question than it does nothing but prove you’re not knowledgeable
Not sure why Neal spends time with people who have no clue.
Because he loves to educate people he talks about that all the time seems like you don't really know him.
@Great White the dude is a lot smarter then you lmao idk what you are talking about.
@Great White Evidence? It's widely accepted that proving anything is an impossibility. We can find evidence that points towards a conclusion to a theory, but scientific proof is a myth. Everything we know in our world today was once a theory or logical argument that mathematicians and the like set out to prove. The reality is, given the math, the probability that we are in a base reality (i.e. not in a simulation) is 1 in a billion. This is mathematical "evidence" that points towards the validity of the Simulation Argument to which said argument hasn't yet been logically dis-proven. It doesn't mean it's true, but it means that the likelihood that we are in a simulation is very high. You know what we also don't have your "proof" for yet? Quantum gravity, dark matter, and a whole lot more things. Do you think it's "irresponsible" for scientists to work on those "hoaxes"?
@Great White it's harder to prove that we are not, because all of evidence we can find can be actually projection of the said simulation
These npcs
Damn he hit her hard with that "the universe is under no obligation to make sense to you" N e i l i s s a v a g e
Neil deGrasse is a fraud, a Satanist, a liar and a bad actor. The globe, space, evolution, aliens and dinosaurs are all lies.
@@realicepick1-vy2mg geez, get a load of this guy ^
@@realicepick1-vy2mg so why are we here then, let me guess,'GOD'
Black woman style: OH no you didn't
Black man style in a woman way: OH YES I DID!
Religion and simulation can co-exist. Elon knows space is not real. czcams.com/video/JHvfBwDmXwE/video.html
If this is a simulation I believe it would not be a "video game" I think maybe the simulators put in specific rules and code in the beginning of the universe and they let it run it's course. They don't make every little piece of the simulation, the science did. We did.
But there are probably way more video games made than history simulations. So by the same logic as us being more likely to be in a simulation than reality, we'd be more likely to be in a video game than a universe history simulation. Besides, we don't know what the video game is about. Maybe it's like Spore. Or maybe it's something that has nothing to do with us and we're just some npcs out in the middle of nowhere space, and the main story takes place elsewhere. Or maybe the players are stars (literal ones). It doesn't have to be so simple as to just be the sims or to have the players be world leaders or something.
Elon talks about video games too. czcams.com/video/JHvfBwDmXwE/video.html
The question is, what happens if this is a simulation and the programmer is aware that we've figured this out?
what could we do about it?
that is probably the end of the game...
Ben Ashworth the end of the game exactly our fear of the end of the world as we know it
absolutely nothing happens, we’re not that advanced to actually have proof of the simulation theory so people will continue to pass it off as nonsense and eventually forgot about it.
Jocelyn R , no proof? Lol
WELL RIGHT NOW ITS FORTNITE HONEY
lmao
Lol, right
and its dead lol
I just saw her in this vid for the first time and i so hate her
So cringe
Trust your own intuition, and don't let anyone tell you what to believe. There are a lot of people on this earth who don't believe in anything beyond the physical because it's beyond their ability to do so, and they will at every turn try to keep you stuck in their ignorance. Raise your vibration, raise your consciousness and open your mind!
Well said Astrum, it literally took me 23 to understand that consciousness and vibration is 100% real, despite people thinking it's psuedo shit, it's just science that hasn't become science yet. Was literally getting controlled left and right because my ideals were too solidified and isn't even realise it. For anyone reading this it may not make sense right now but It's possible to escape different layers to this shit.
Luminous B I understand stood this message because I have evolved, and raised my consciousness. It’s a beautiful journey, hope you have a great day my friend 🙏🏼💫
Astrum DMT
Actually people control other people its true we need to open our eyes and minds!
I believe in both. Simulation and religion can co-exist. czcams.com/video/JHvfBwDmXwE/video.html
Please find a smarter female host.
That woman is embarassing.
Ilona right
Everyone has a different role. Like Howard Stern and Robin Quivers.
Yeah she did not have the ability to think. Pretty embarrassing. czcams.com/video/JHvfBwDmXwE/video.html
His way of explaining it would make a child understand it. It's obvious when it comes to boundaries and a species curiosity to break rules and work around it. Scientifically possible. Hence he can't argue against the idea. Very plausible until proven otherwise.
oonga boonga, you clearly wanna look like a programmed NPC by this comment and yes, earth is flat and we live in an electromagnetic field , beyond the organical membrane there are other dimensions and YES, space program is about contacting with the correct frequency of vibrations, operation High Jump, Wolfenstein 2009 (videogame) , Singularity , you know about real science ? NO i see u ignorant, go watch what admiral Byrd described when he descended Earth with a crystal cube used by the ancient civilization he met there, Yes, pyramids in the antartic lands connect different simulators/realms from others
If we are in a simulation then how come I can't dodge bullets like Neo?
Coz you're a noob
Because you didn't take the red pill yet.
Angry Allen you just have to re-login with creative mode on
Because your level 1 noob
Because neo is the choosen one now here is the real question are you the choosen one.
Well, there is an argument against the "simulation" conjecture. It's called Occam's Razor which is an important part of science. The idea is that if you are looking for an explanation for something, you should look for the simplest one able to account for all the facts. The reason is that the more unnecessarily complex it gets, the less probable it is the actual explanation. Here's why: Sometimes laws or rules that a universe follows are actually constraints on what can happen. Put in too many (complicate it too much that way) and you can constrain your reality out of existence (your model can't explain your universe). Other times, you might make so many things possible, in trying to be able to explain everything, that the amount of significantly different universes your model allows may be so immensely huge that the probability that it actually corresponds to your universe is infinitely small. Even more, that idea is related to a part of Physics called Thermodynamics, which explains why when you mix, say, water and sugar, the dissolved sugar never, on it's own, separates from the water again to form solid sugar crystals:
A "state" is where each molecule is, how it's oriented, and what it's doing (rotating quickly in this direction, this part vibrating slowly, going quickly towards the right...)
When you give the water and sugar the freedom of mixing, it opens up so immensely more actually possible sugar mixed with water states than there are possible sugar separate from water states that there is simply no significant chance that by random motion and change the sugar and water will reach a "being separate" state again.
A "too free" model of the Universe will not give you your universe, but rather one of a much larger group. The "simulation" explanation seems to me as one of the latter, because while a simulation (purportedly "our universe") has to be simpler than the actual universe in which it is made, else it would not be computable, here the "actual universe" in this scenario would be a free for all of anything.
Furthermore, this idea shouldn't make you lose sleep because even if you were in a simulation, as long as all those to which we relate are in the same and we are all truly sentient (conscious) and mortal, our relationships are real and an abrupt end to the simulation would simply be our turn to die. Additionally, it is questionable we even need to be truly conscious, as Bhuddists see ourselves as machines made of smaller parts, and if the parts are not conscious, there is no reason to think the whole is, so we only experience the illusion of consciousness. And yet they live their lives.
As a final measure, you might also want to apply the "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" criterion -emphasis on "reasonable"-. Now, does that simulation idea hit you as reasonable, versus our understanding of a coherent, law abiding universe?
Which brings us back to Occam's razor.
I was waiting for the black woman to say “this ain’t no god dam game”
Based on the incredible size of the universe, and how much of it we know is empty, and without life -- it seems improbable that much waste would be created in a simulation.
Maybe our universe is just randomly generated that way.
we are not in a video game, we are in an artificial universe that may predict the future and some possibilities of the superior universe
What if taking psychedelics lets us peep through the system. The so called "Trippy visuals" Is really just glitches.😳 Alot of people including me see geometric patterns and feel like their in a CGI animation.
YESSSSSS THIS IS WAT IVE BEEN SAYINGGGGGGG
My phone feels super heavy when I do acid and it starts glitching !! It also starts to not work with the password and will do really weird stuff ...
That is cuz it’s a drug, of course your gonna hallucinate
Im talking about the matrix but yeah lets go with that.
@@Boogieman94 tell me more about it though ,it’s interesting
Noooo I'm scared!!!!!!!!! There's too many coincidences that happen in my life and now I'm actually believing this Nani Nanda korowua help mee nanai naoanankajanes kanai so no rostu koruwas orqed nananananananan
You good bro
My guy looks SMACKED in the thumbnail
Lmaooo this one hit 😂
that atmosphere joke :D
Food for thought...when you through the dart are you throwing the dart from a stimulated world? When you are looking into this ripple down effect are you looking from reality into stimulation or from stimulation look on to other stimulations? Someone to say life is stimulated, the statement itself would have to come from stimulated mind so why should I believe that then...
Characters in a game dont think for themselves we do thats the difference were not a simulation also games are full if glitches ive never seen the planet randomly go pixelated or someone get stuck in a wall like a computer game character some people are crazy
Exactly
His dart analogy is great
that's not an analogy. he's just saying what are the chances you'd hit base reality with a dart among a bunch of nested simulations
They had no idea what he was talking about 😂
Ah, when the highest order of society rubs elbows with the lowest...
Its funny how her 1st reaction is to tell her co anchor that he needs to go back to sleep...zzzz
Short answer is yes. For example these people are all actors reading from a script with a agenda.
2:25 I’m mad that this got me 😂😂
If they have the tech to make the simulation then they have the tech to make it adaptive.
Can I have an upgrade and move into an apartment with a ten car garage then would be nice
There’s a code for that, code #1 get a job or multiple jobs, code #2 win the lottery. Everything has laws of codes.
Tim Minh ok, it’s true...
First time I've seen him open with a humble answer
0:05 is the truth of life.
In the eleventh canto of "Srimad-Bhagavatam", Krishna says to Uddhava that the gross and subtle forms of material bodies have no existence of their own; they are only temporary patterns manifested by the eternally existing reality, the Absolute Truth.
-Hindu Holy Book
instincts are just the things we’re programmed to do
When the guy in the background says true... I mean thats the best thing ever
Fibinnocci sequence exponential expansion osmoseous and cell division
Oh how did it do that?
I think people will get more suspicious when are games become more and more like real life until it is.
@1:35 👀💀 Oooo Neil told her!! LoL 🤣😂
"The Universe is under NO obligation to make sense to you"
I cannot wait to use this line myself! I will give credit where credit is due, of course.
Infinent mass within finite space... 0.1:0.9 right?
He has a good point....are we in a simulation??? That's for yhe world to wonder
Well, neil lemme tell you this, since we curently can't simulate life, we are either the real univers or we are the ones in the very front of simulated universes. So its a 50/50 chance
Imagine if life is a game... When you end it, you can make custom life (you can set up that you can be rich, famous...)
Farwell and some people chose to be crack heads.? Lmao tripping
@@chuyrod1391 lol
Then everyone will choose rich and all...thats just not true
We still have emotions, we feel pain etc. Its impossible to be in a simulation
Video game characters also feel pain though
@@hoetistic1650 no lmao
@@dinakis4821 explain cutscenes
Baby there are 12 dimensions , u don't even know what 4th dimension is capable of
@@hoetistic1650 it's a program made by a developer performed by motion capturers and being voiced by voice actors.
Being in a simulation and thinking that we could be in simulation is incredible.
Ikr
🤣
Does assuming there are more than one simulated universe violen the
Parsimony?
Neil doesn’t believe in intelligent design, but he believes in the simulation hypothesis?
Ray Z Yes. Backwards thinking, huh?
He is a paid actor with a agenda
We accept the world which we are presented... - the Truman show
Within reason guy! Seriously.
Pretty sure the guy that would program us would not allow us to think about the fact that we maybe in a simulation
That's what I thought.
I often cite love or any emotion for that matter, but I like to pick to on love, because people around the world put so much onus on this word love and all its intention and meaning as it being this higher all conquering thing, well bad news its not, if this world was real, and love was real with it, then our entire collective thoughts as to what love is, would be universal, and indeed all conquering, I am willing to bet however that as there are drugs (prescribed or otherwise but mostly in this case prescribed) in existance that can kill off lust (just look at how chemical castration works) then I am willing to bet that there is a drug or combination of drugs out there than can kill off love, there are people born into this world without the ability to love, there are people in this world who are born with all the normal things in life, and who are able to love and then some accident befalls them and they are left unable to love, if you take a child and instead of expressing love to them in their growing up, but instead lock them in a room and deprive them of love, they will grow up not able to express it, and remember I am only saying that we put this big thing on what love is, and its so called ability to conquer all, but it doesnt, and people through such things in life follow a path determined by their experiences.... I was run over by a car when I was 2, suffered a number of injuries one them being massive brain trauma and yet you wouldnt know that I had to look at me today at 43years old, I am just an average person, but speak to me at length and you realise that I couldnt give a shit about love, and its not that I dont believe in it, I know love is not a real or tangable thing, like how you might know 1 + 1 = 2, and then at 4 years old I endured child abuse until the day after I turned 11 years old and was taken into care, the damage however has been done, and then 3 years or so of false promises by various women has meant that whatever might have been salvagable after being run over, or after the child abuse or after being treated like shit through various relationships with women has led me to a logical thought path of trying to figure out what love is, and I am damn sure its nothing more than a chemical inbalance within the brain (sure its one we might like the feeling of now and then) but nonetheless it seems to follow the routes that other chemical inbalances take, and as such I am sure there is a drug out there than can kill it, within even the most ardent of persons who are all for love. I say all of this because if love was a real thing, then it would persist within all of us, but it doesnt, damage the code of some program enough with a virus and you break the program, damage enough of a person and you break their code and you then break that person, its a known punishment tactic... its known because its all coded, its all logical, there's nothing hidden about it.... it does indeed therefore seem like we are part of some fucking simulation, and one im tired of.
So, so many holes in your statement. First being that you put a definite meaning to "love" which is entirely subjective. It not being real to you doesn't mean it isn't "real". Your entire argument stands on a very particular definition to love but in reality there is none. You can ask a multitude of people what love is and what is encompassed in it and you'll get an entire spectrum of answers and experiences. Why? Because love is something we "feel" and inherently taught as well so there is no "universal" definition for it and thus it cannot be something that "conquers all". Hell that very statement can be a a hyperbole to some (maybe yourself included) but that undermines real stories of people overcoming life altering obstacle through love. It seems like your talking the movie stereotype of what love is and what it does quite literally, which begs me to question your statement as a whole if you can't differentiate a medium trying to make money off of people's pathos and what love is at it's core. That being said you also mentioned being able to feel "love" through an outside medium such as drugs but in that instance your taking love to be something closer to a mental byproduct rather than a mutual experience and condition. Finally what in the world does this have to do with living in a simulation? Love like anything else is something that can die and leave you if you're not in a good condition. The argument of love's existence should mean everything should be perfect or at least close to it is nonsensical. There's too many factors in this world that make it what it is to say something like that. That being said living in a simulation could be possibility simply due to the fact that there is no way of knowing if we were in one.
@@BHALT0S You're one of those, huh? 40+ and dense asf. It's fucking CZcams but if want info research it yourself ffs. No way you're getting anything legit off a comment data wise. Everything you said was more rooted in assumptions, more so than what I said, so if anything YOU show me some legit links.
I wish she’d talk less and let Neil talk more
O no you didn’t! O yes i did 😂
Rick and morty was right were a simulation inside a simulation inside a giant simulation
Plato's Cave.
Living in the brain of a superior / supernatural being.
Who needs sleep Amiright?
Who ever is playing earth
Don't shutdown the windows
Did he really just ask “can we simulate” after Neil just basically explained that for him 😂😂😂😂😂
So am I real or am I not? Is all this pain and suffering I have gone through just bits on a computer? If we are in a simulation, are we in a Matrix or are we self-aware computer programs?
Wondering how a computer will have a self awareness
Am not getting the real answer
is it still simulation while we dream Bc once we dream, we end up in diff world too sometimes idk I can’t find the real answer 👀
VisualTam maybe when we dream is the only time we escape the simulation, that’s why drugs are illegal because it’s like dreaming awake or temporarily escaping the simulation
@@CornholioPuppetMaster makes sense , and they tease us with what little weed we have already
a confused man, a narcissistic woman, and an educated scientist sitting in a room...
If we are in a simulation dose that make the game designers God
It's funny how people accept the simulation reality but not the 'flat' earth one. They're one and the same.
So god is real is what hes saying
like talking emotions with a robot
I'm just saying. The woman is the one who got diffensive and offended
My question is very basic and stupid
If we r being played like a video game by someone something or whatever
Whats the point?
This game on earth seems to be very ugly to be played with right?
Who wd be delighted to play our game?
As a kid I played a video game super mario.. Mentally at that small age.. I had a little fun but if we the people having these physical bodies that go thru pain misery and all that.. Who will get pleasure or fun out of this game? Nobody is that evil
In a video game characters have no existence of their own ..untill we connect the video game and start playing..those characters cannot laugh cry talk of their own do not fall ill or do not get cured obviously
So ..why do we gave pain and all jf we r just being played
If we are a program then doesn't that contradict the double slit experiment?
The fuck are you talking about? The double slit experiment is what ignited this simulated universe theory.
he could have explained that soo much better
so basically we could be living in a simulation by people who live in a simulation
Oh yes I did!. 😌
Ima play Sims lol
There is one question I have? Who created the first computer system for the simulation(s) to take place... God is the only answer my limited 3 pound brain can conclude!
Neal out here makin these fools look like they ain't know shit
Why do they try to make it look so stupid? Like they're actually smarter than him or understand the basis of how physics works seriously? Why are they being so weird and fake.
Zainal Azrul , the universe is made up of tiny atoms which consists of tinier electronic particles that spins around each other all the time, watch “double-slit experiment”. What is holding you back in understanding is the lack of knowledge. Just saying...
Did elon musk say we are living in a computer simulation,? Or did he say there is a possibility that we are.
czcams.com/video/J0KHiiTtt4w/video.html
What's sad is the idiots interviewing Neil probably make more money than me, capitalism is unfair! Lol
Someone programmed the universe.
Can be a 14-year-old playing us as different characters in his video game.
But there is no possibility of an intelligent creator? Just because he also sets some rules for the game.
Classic atheist logic.
So this proves the earth is flat then right??
Good lord
It's always the dumbest people who instantly blow it off and put literally zero thought into it...just "Nawww boi you cray c'mon now"
If this world is just a simulation then why does eating raisins give me gas? Seems like a pretty stupid thing to program into a simulation.
this man was on fire
I kind of wish he was.
Does he believe in God now?
Jayce Segler basically
God isn’t some magnificent being that you religious people believe in. It’s just another human that create a simulated world so no he doesn’t
Hamzie Plays Where the hell is the proof of that lmfao. All you’re doing is speculating.
BuT wE’rE 3-0 wOu I’m just stating what he believes idiot. I don’t believe this theory but it’s interesting nonetheless. Anyways I got a question for you. Why believe in god and the bible. All you see is words and promises from people thousands of years ago.
8÷3, 7÷3.... 😤🤯🤔🥴😒🤨
deGrass is a gatekeeper. He was making fun it 10 years ago. He wants everyone to laugh because the joke is on you. He has sold his soul.
If you were playing super Mario she interups it’s fortnite now lmfao oh Neil you old as hell 😎😂👏✌️
Tyson and musk you are little marionettes 😄 go home and play with your cat
There was 69 comments before me hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahaahah lol
Amazing how little pushback Tyson and other pseudo scientists get on this absurd crap.
Bro I wish you knew how we looked at you, Tyson, and all those other "pseudo scientists", including Einstein, and Nickola Tesla, before the hype, you'd be amazing. It's like a main character looking at Npcs.
Luminous B Einstein and Tesla were actual scientists whereas Neil deGrasse Tyson manages a planetarium. He also spouts unscientific nonsense to try to get the dumb masses (you) interested in science.
dkgatlin
There’s always a random no avatar conspiracy theorist in the comments section of these types of videos, accusing Tyson of being a “bad” scientist and thinking anyone who follows him is “dumb”
Yet there’s no evidence supporting this.
If you have some sources that are outside of your conspiracy theory websites I’d love to have a look.
LogRoll yes, I believe in the wild conspiracy theory that we’re not living in a computer simulation. Please direct me to some of these conspiracy websites where wild eyed crazies think we should be skeptical of claims made by pop scientists that aren’t based on anything but faulty statistics and aren’t observable or falsifiable.
dkgatlin
I never said anything about us living in a simulation.
I’m asking for evidence that Tyson isn’t an “actual” scientist.
If you can’t answer that but rather you ignore that and proceed to ask me a question than it does nothing but prove you’re not knowledgeable
Neil is annoying
That women is so annoying
0:07 is the truth of life.
& 0:05