Ex-chief justice Davide: ‘Absolute divorce is absolutely prohibited under the Constitution’
Vložit
- čas přidán 20. 08. 2024
- Former chief justice Hilario Davide explains why he believes that “absolute divorce is absolutely prohibited under the 1987 Constitution,” as he speaks in a forum at the University of the Philippines College of Law on Wednesday, July 10.
Watch more on the divorce bill: www.rappler.co...
Subscribe: bit.ly/Rappler...
More videos on Rappler: www.rappler.co...
Follow Rappler for the latest news in the Philippines and around the world.
Support independent journalism. You can help power our investigative fund by donating to our crowdfunding: donate.rappler...
Thank you so much Chief Justice Hilario Davide for sharing your wisdom and guidance on the issue of Absolute Divorce. God bless you and your family! God bless us all. Amen
Bravo Justice Davide for a comprehensive & compact argument ags divorce based on divine law & constitution. Simple & enlightening.
❤️❤️. Happy to see and hear from you Hon. Chief Justice Davide ❤️. Our Cebuano pride. Hoping to hear more from you regarding important issues in our country. Godbless sir❤️
Magkaroon nlng kaya nga campaign.... let us not vote politicians who are hypocrites... No to senators opposing the divorce bill
Sana maranasan mo rin mg karumal dumal na marriage par amalaman mo.amg.pakiramdam.ng walang divorce 😂
Thank you, Chief Justice Hilario Davide. May God continue to save, protect and bless all the marriages and our relationships with our families. 😇😇😇🙏🙏🙏❤❤❤
gusto nyo lang kumita ng pera sa annulment, maging patas kayo sa batas sa mahirap at sa mayaman , marami ng bansa may divorce , bakit sa Pilipinas ipinagkakait nyo Ang divorce. wag nyo hawakan sa leeg Ang mga Pilipino na mamili kung sino Ang gusto nila makasama habang Buhay na di Sila lolokohin at tunay Silang mamahalin. selfish kayo Kasi maganda Ang naging marriage life. pero paano na Yung mga tao na napinta sa mga asawang di Matino pag iisip ,na nanloloko , palayain nyo Sila na lumigaya muli ,
Thank you Chief Justice Davide, may the lawmakers be enlightened ..God Bless You Sir.
If divorce is prohibited by the Constitution then why annulment is allowed.? Kalokohan
Pati ba naman sa marriage may social classification pa din. Annulment pang mayaman lang. Pano naman yung mga mahihirap na walang pang annull sa kasal.?
@@anthonystaana7079 kasi po iba sa annulment nililinaw lang na invalid o mag defect yung marriage kaya NULL po ito. Huehue
Annulment means the wedding did not really happen therefore null, divorce on the other hand means that the man and woman are formerly married but no longer after divorce, the annulment means no marriage has pushed through in the first place therefore when a marriage between a man and a woman was annuled that means they were never married in the first place.
@@jnleysonsige ilagay natin example ikaw. Kasal ikaw may mga anak ngayon naging drug addict,lasingero si mister and binubogbog ikaw asawa kasama na rin mga anak nyo. Gusto mo pa? Masyado ikaw matalino. Ang divorce hindi din magyayari sa mga magulang mo yan. Kasi love nila ang isat isa paano yung hindi na? To make it simple divorce must be pass and be legal. The masses needs the law.
@@norgesta lol. May legal separation po. Alangan naman magpagulpe ka hanggang kamatayan. Pero kahit ganun, di pa din excuse na sumakabilang bahay ka kasi di ka naman pinilit magpakasal sa asawa mo. Hehe
@@jnleyson who say sumakabilang bahay? This is for the voice of woman who are maltreated by their spouses and children too. Hindi mo alam yung worst of this experience. Sa pagpalagay natin perfect ang marriage ng magulang mo. I wont disclosed in a society o sa campus nyo hindi mawala ang may pamilya na ganyan. This is not for you who have perfect family 10/10. But this is for the broken family that gets the beating. Bakit ka magpa divorce kong masaya at respected k ng spouse mo? Masyadong mahaba na. Sana hindi mangyari sayo o sa pamilya mo na may asawa na binubigbog.
Divorce is for 2 consenting adults who want and need it. If it's not for you because of your religion or belief, then why would you prevent others from having it?
Nonsense! hyprocrytical comment!you cannot deside others body!
Our current laws allow for married people to legally separate. We already have it. Instead, making the process of legal separation a lot easier and affordable should be the focus. There is absolution no need for a divorce law.
Eh di mag file kau ng legal separation or divorce. Marriage is not just a contract na pag ayaw na pareho ay ayaw na. You may not had grasp what marriage is in the first place. If you do not have the decision to commit, do not commit in the 1st place. Otherwise, sa hwes ka na lng magpakasal.
No need in our country....there is a better way that's annulment...no to divorce..
#YesToDivorce❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
The best chief justice in the Philippines
what justice? has it erradicate corruption in government! it is only meant to rich and not to poor people!
Thank you ex chief justice Hilario Davide.God bless you.
Divorce as a Right
1. Individual Autonomy and Freedom:
• Divorce can be seen as a manifestation of an individual’s right to personal autonomy and freedom. This perspective argues that individuals have the right to make decisions about their own lives, including the decision to end a marriage.
2. Protection from Harm:
• In cases of abuse, neglect, or irreparable breakdown of a marriage, divorce can be seen as a right to protect individuals from harm and to ensure their well-being. This aligns with human rights principles that protect individuals from suffering and uphold their dignity.
3. Equality:
• Ensuring the right to divorce can promote gender equality by allowing both men and women to leave marriages that are harmful or no longer serve their interests. This is particularly significant in contexts where women might be more vulnerable within marital relationships.
Divorce as a Privilege
1. Cultural and Religious Beliefs:
• In some cultures and religious traditions, marriage is viewed as a sacred and indissoluble institution. In these contexts, the ability to divorce might be restricted, and when allowed, it may be seen more as a privilege granted under specific circumstances rather than a fundamental right.
2. Legal Restrictions:
• In some jurisdictions, legal frameworks might impose strict conditions on divorce, treating it as a privilege that must be justified and granted by the state. This can include requirements such as proving fault, undergoing counseling, or fulfilling separation periods.
Philippine Context
In the Philippines, divorce is currently not available under the general civil law (with the exception of Muslims governed by the Code of Muslim Personal Laws). The options available are legal separation, annulment, and nullity of marriage, each with specific legal requirements and processes.
If Congress were to pass a divorce law, the debate would likely include discussions on whether divorce should be treated as a right accessible to all individuals under certain conditions, or as a privilege subject to specific legal and moral standards.
Ultimately, whether divorce is seen as a right or a privilege can influence how laws are framed and implemented, impacting individuals’ ability to leave marriages that no longer serve their needs or well-being.
Sa tingin ko.divorce is not the solution.
Totoo Yung teleserye ni Kim Chu na Linlang.
Madami gusto Ng Divorce Kasi na Linlang or nanlilinlang.kawawa mga faithful na asawa.kawawa mga anak na biktima na magulang na malikot Ang isip.
Real love from God vs Love of money from the devil.
A righteous love vs deceitful love.
A righteous love vs lust of the eyes.
In fairness to those who tell victim of love. Dpat higpitan batas Ng pangangalunya/pakiki apid.pbigatin parusa.
Protection against women & children mas lagyan pa ruling. KC if baba gumagawa Ng kalokohan paano di unfair na.
Dapat magbuo Ang government Ng commission for moral recovery focus on family KC kunting problema lang Hiwalayan na gusto iba.pero di iniisip mga anak.
If asawa na may basbas si God dk nag success.paano sa pangalawa?sure ba? Or sa pangatlo ulit?
@@mr.kalim_B it is UNCONSTITUTIONAL PO. hehe
@@jnleyson It hasn’t been ruled by the SC yet, so I don’t think it’s proper to already declare it as unconstitutional. Let’s keep in mind that only the Court can interpret the law. In this context, it is still a forum discussion wherein different honorable persons are sharing their respective stances on the Divorce Bill. Let’s refrain from preempting the Supreme Court’s decision and avoid stating that Divorce is unconstitutional, doing so only confuses people and propagates the spread of misinformation.
@@mal5539 There is nothing to debate on the very spirit of the letters of Constitutional provision stating that marriage is "INVIOLABLE". It expresses what it is and what it should be as a permanent union that is never to broken, regardless of reasons.
@@renzrelucio1395 That’s YOUR opinion based on a verba legis or literal interpretation of the provision. However, it could also be interpreted differently by considering the INTENT OF THE FRAMERS of the Constitution. AGAIN, we are not part of the Supreme Court, so we cannot rule on the constitutionality of Divorce. Furthermore, discussions such as this would not occur if the constitutionality of the Divorce Bill were not open to debate.
If you have a happy marriage then divorce is not for you. Do not deprived others of freedom from sufferings, those who are not as lucky as you. God also do not want His children to suffer anymore that’s why divorce will be approved in this country. How can a toxic marriage become sacred? If your husband is cheating on you, beating you and your children, or is not providing even food on the table, how can your marriage be sacred????
Why not improve the power of legal separation? Divorce aims nothing but remarriage. Marriage is only for those who know the meaning of LIFETIME COMMITMENT.
How about initiating a movement for contractual partnership? I think differentiating Marriage (LIFETIME) and Contract Based Partnership would be a better option for anybody who is in line with yoyr stand
@@jnleysonwhy should the victim not have an opportunity to remarry? should she be a victim forever because her husband is evil?
Why do you talk of marriage as if the person you “marry” was something drawn out if a box or a spinning wheel? Choose well before even getting married or dont get married at all!
@@LiwaySaGuif the husband is evil, then the marriage might have been null and void. IT NEVER EXISTED. Thats what annulment is. Its 2 crazies thinking they’re getting married but they are not.
@@elcaps564masasabi mo lang yan kac happy married ka
You will not understand Divorce if your married life is successful. It's like giving your complete thoughts on something that you haven't experienced yet.
That is why you married in the 1st place - to commit to work it out. Eh di sa hwes ka magpakasal.
They understand divorce as unconstitutional. They are experts of our constitution.
@@CarlDuca hence the need to amend the constitution
@@beautifullycreatablestupid response. There’s no difference between marriage sa hawed or simbahan.
@@beautifullycreatableobob walang pinag kaiba ang church at civil wedding shunga 😂
Thank you Justice Davide❤
Thanks po for courageously upholding God's command and defending moral law.
A 1985 study tracked 1,000 families with children aged 6 to 18 for six years and found that children living in intact married families exhibited the least delinquency, while children with stepfathers were more likely to demonstrate the most disruptive behaviors.
In a British longitudinal study of males aged 8 to 32, David P. Farrington, professor of criminology at Cambridge University, found that the divorce of parents before a child reached age 10 is a major predictor of adolescent delinquency and adult criminality.
A recent U.S. longitudinal study which tracked over 6,400 boys over a period of 20 years (well into their adult years) found that children without biological fathers in the home are roughly three times more likely to commit a crime that leads to incarceration than are children from intact families
Excerpt from " Effects of Divorce in America" by Patrick F. Fagan and Robert Rector
girl 1985 study. Rule of thumb for research is at most 10 year difference from discussing the issue at hand. Ang dami na nangyari, different generations mean different appreciation of information, nurtururing, care, living, expenses, etc. nkklk
@@Mark-jn7qd then give a more recent study that would counter that
@@beautifullycreatable I'm not supposed to counter a study that's almost 40 years old. That's comparing how technology affects a person without internet and accessible phonelines with a study of a world that already has 5g and starlink. We really are in an education crisis haha
@@beautifullycreatable but since you asked for it here you go:
Kelly, J. B., & Emery, R. E. (2003), "Children's adjustment following divorce: Risk and resilience perspectives," explores various factors influencing how children adjust to divorce. Here is a summary focusing on the potential positive influences or effects on children:
Resilience Perspective: The study emphasizes that many children show resilience in the face of divorce, adapting well to changes in family structure and dynamics.
Reduced Exposure to Conflict: Divorce can remove children from high-conflict environments, reducing emotional distress and allowing them to thrive in more stable and supportive settings.
Improved Parent-Child Relationships: Post-divorce, parents may prioritize their children's well-being more effectively, leading to improved relationships and stronger emotional bonds.
Development of Coping Skills: Going through divorce can foster the development of coping skills and emotional maturity in children, preparing them to handle adversity later in life.
Individualized Attention: In some cases, children may receive more individualized attention from parents post-divorce, which can positively impact their emotional and psychological development.
Overall, while divorce can be challenging for children, the study suggests that under certain circumstances, it can lead to positive outcomes such as improved family relationships, reduced stress, and opportunities for personal growth and resilience. These factors contribute to a nuanced understanding of the effects of divorce on children's well-being.
@@Mark-jn7qdyoud be not so wise to trust the “advancements” of this world as more superior than before. A tablet kid vs a 40 year ago child? Today, is worse i hope is the answer? Then just because its new, it does not mean its better. Now is even worse, and destroying marriages will destroy what’s already being destroyed by the direction our society is going to.
put God in the center of your marriage and there is no divorce.
I am not for divorce, I am for the AVAILABILITY of divorce. God has the power to bind and unbind, to create and destroy. Make divorce available for all the souls who are bound to a dire or evil situation or person. Free them from pain and let them avail a better path to live their lives in peace and happiness.
Emphasis on discernment of marriage is important and help those whk are in troubled abusive marriages BUT dont get into a lifetime institution with a bad person. Society today makes light of sex and relationships as if it were a sport, and then after all the roller coaster ride of “courtship”, if you even call it that, you get married to a bad person, the blinders are gone, the smoke out,’you can see the monster in your bed. Dont destroy marriage, dont get married to a monster!
Good words. I am in a happy marriage since late 1996 by the way.
Amen. ❤ A big Salute to my favorite Chief Justice! ❤️
Yessssssssss to divorce. Stop being so hypocrite
Hypocrite of what??
If it's in the Constitution, why use the Biblical verses as basis? Not everyone in the Philippines is Catholic, and there are plenty of them who are hypocrites!
😢😢
If you are not Catholic, why argue? Our Constitution is based on the principles of the Bible. If you are not Catholic, I don't think you understamd what marriage is.
Ako nga catholic pero hindi na ko naniniwala sa kanila.😂 sino bang Diyos ang may gustong magkapatayan ang mag asawa? Tapos pinayagan ang annulment pero divorce hindi? 😂 nakakatawa. Dahil ng sa kapirasong papel, swerte naman ng mag bebenefits na kahit matagal na kayong hiwalay sya pa din makakakuha😅 ayusin nyo batas nyo wag puro pera. May annulment nga sobrang tagal mahal na sobrang tagal pang maipasa. Halatang pinagkakaperahan lang 😂 #YesToDivorce
@@beautifullycreatableyou are very wrong
@@jericoeugenio4635there’s more money to be made in annulment
Divorce is important in a civil society as it provides a legal means to dissolve marriages that are irreparably broken, ensuring individual rights and freedoms.
It allows individuals to leave unhealthy or abusive relationships, promotes personal well-being, and upholds the principles of personal autonomy and equality.
By enabling the legal end of a marriage, divorce helps maintain social stability and allows people to rebuild their lives, contributing to the overall health of the society.
It is not important, it destroys the foundation of the community, it risks the security of women and it shaken's a child's development.
@@beautifullycreatablelol
Praise the Lord!
SELFISH REASON!
Thank u po
IT IS TIME TO REVISE THE CONSTITUTION. MOVE ON. ANG DAMING IBA IBA ANG KINAKASAMA, HIWALAY DAHIL WALANG DIVORCE. ANONG KLASENG BUHAY YAN?
DIVORCE IS THE LAST RESORT FOR COUPLE WHO HAS ABUSIVE RELATIONSHIPS.
Marriage is sacred to our constitution, kaya dapat kilatisin mo maigi papakasalan mo, kaya nga iba live in muna, Yung iba naka tatlo o dalawa anak na Bago nagpapakasal. Ganun Ang diskarte.
Yeah, since he wants to throw God and everything I guess he missed apart for God granted divorces this dudes, is a idiot
Wrong.divorce is not the solution but human behavior has to change.
S mata ng Diös kabit kabit ay kasalanan at ang kasal ay d dapat maghiwalay,paano wla n love respito s isat isa at nagkakasakitan n,ano ang dapat gawin? Panghahawakan prin b ang kapirasong papel dahil lng s kasal? Sna bigyan din ng pangalawang pagkakataon ang mga nkaranas ng trauma. Yes divorce bill plz.
Kahit walang divorce sobrang dami ding hiwalay sa asawa at may kinakasama ng iba mas mabuti pa bigyan nila ng kalayaan lalo na kung matagal ng hiwalay ang mag asawa kawawa naman yung isa kung ngpundar sya tapos kasali pa sa pundat nya yung asawa nyang matagal na clang hiwalay napa ka unfair nun
Kung maayos ang pag sasama nyo good po sa inyong lahat .Pero huwag po ninyo kami idamay na matagal ng hiwalay at may kanya kanya ng landas at gustong magkadivorce na sa Pilipinas.
Mag botohan nalang kaya ang sambayanang Pilipino ng yes or no sa Divorce para fair.
Yessss to Divorce.
#YESTODIVORCE
Salamat po Justice Davide. I have been praying that divorce bill will not be put into law. May the Holy Family preserved the Filipino families. Pray for the conversion of the hearts of those who push this evil bill especially wicked Lagman.
Praise God for Justice Davide
Unfortunately not all Filipinos are devoted and will find ways to circumvent the laws of the constitution. It's a sad reality that we can't avoid. Even some of our celebrities and politicians aren't exactly role models. 🙄
Thank you Chief Justice Hilario Davide for reiterating the composition of our Constitution and enlightening our lawmakers of the Supreme Divine Law. May God bless you and your family for upholding to the Catholic faith.🙏❤️🙏
We speak of divorce as if it enables healing but its extremely important that we keep in mind the suffering of the children.
Thank you, Justice Davide! ❤ Great help to more souls!
Thank you, Ex chief justice Davide for your defence of married! I was amazed how the snake done this to those supported the bill for divorce.
Thank SC Justice Davide for upholding God's law
The consequences of absolute divorce are totally different from the consequences of what is absolutely prohibited under the constitution. Thus, absolute divorce is not absolutely prohibited under the constitution.
“So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.”
✝️ Matthew 19:6
God is good. All praise and glory to God. 🙏🏼
The bible also says, even the leaves will not fall if God will not allow it. If couples separate then God allows it. It is not the intention of God for a spouse(wife) to suffer under the cruelty of the spouse(husband). Even Judas who became one with Christ at first was separated by God from his son in the end.
@@yuridelossantos569 kindly state the bible verse
Philippines is not a theocracy. And not all Philippinos are following the teachings of the bible. Why force them under the slogans of a certain holy book?
@@wernerschneider4460 you need to be specific, what ur saying is very broad.
Protect the meaning of MARRIAGE!
thank you,
Mismong nag frame ng Constitution na natin yan ah.
no wonder why this government is so weak
@@uokay7933 so your only remedy is to weaken the Filipino family? What a slippery slope.
@@HendrickAlbina remember we are the only nation left along with the Vatican city-state to not allow divorce... We are not special... We live in the country with the worst child abuses, drug and alcohol abuses, youth pregnancy, corruption, murder incidents, etc... whatever happened to your Catholic version of "family values"
@@uokay7933 that bandwagon mentality does not change the fact that divorce is not a fix.
Divorce is a tool that people with unhappy and abusive marriage can use to another chance at life.
Praise the Lord. Hallelluia!
Yes to divorce.
simply put....WE NEED A NEW CONSTITUTION without RELIGIOUS COLORATION.... this country has various religions and therefore the constitution must accommodate that....
Divorce is a Human Rights
A clash of Titans between former Associate Justice of the SC Conchita Carpio Morales and former SC CJ Hilario Davide
hurray for former Associate Justice SC Conchita Carpio Morales
@@marianpanelo7188but she is not part of the constitutional commission who drafted the 1986 constitution. I would rather believe the one who was a member of that commission and a former Chief Justice.
It shows that Roman Catholic was an instrument in our constitution no wonder we are in chaos
Thank you so much ex Chief Justice Hilario Davide for following God's commandment and explain to using God'Law
Godbless , you are the true justice davide who carry out the truth ,God forbid immoral laws in the philippines
I'm for Absolute divorce!!!
Look, people, it's not that hard to understand. This is NOT about God or Religion, this is about BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS!! There are some marriages that just don't work, some of them are abusive. Denying Filipinos the right to get out of such abusive relations and effectively imprisoning them to that kind of life is MORALLY wrong! Pilipinas nalang po ang wala pang Divorce, tayo at yung Holy See(Vatican)!!
The Philippines is a secular country, it is imbedded in our constitution itself! So why are we imposing Roman Catholic values to the whole of the country that also have other religions!!? This is Hypocrisy at its Most Shameless!! Shame on You!
Agree!
wla kang paki sa buhay ng iba kung anung ggwin nila wag tayo epokrito..
Thank you for acknowledging the Holy Bible, Our Divine Law...
Thank you Justice Davide
Divorce therefore is a prelude to commiting adultery😉
ADULTERY HAPENS EVERYTIME WITH OR WITOUT DIVORCE...
Adultery happens all the time. It's not illegal by law. And it's often done by people who go to church every few days.
sa kweba kaba nakatira ? wala ka pa mundo wala pang divorce marami ng adultery 😅
Thank you for defending the sanctity of marriage Chief Justice Davide.
Yeeesssss! No to DIVORCE!!!
hindi ka na naawa sa battered wife
@@MarkCDiazfile a criminal case sa asawa nya why divorce 😂 we have existing laws 😂
@@rosemi719file a criminal case and then ano ang sunod ?
His is just a point view, no amount of weight as Chief Justice can be used as sole authority to judge the pain of suffering in induring an abusive marriage, let the involved parties have peaceful lives each of their separate life when reconcillation is definitely impossible...no one is forcing you to continue or discontinue your marriage, be free but don't infrenge our liberty and the right to have a happy life...even alone for heaven's sake.
Ako nga catholic pero hindi na ko naniniwala sa kanila.😂 sino bang Diyos ang may gustong magkapatayan ang mag asawa? Tapos pinayagan ang annulment pero divorce hindi? 😂 nakakatawa. Dahil ng sa kapirasong papel, swerte naman ng mag bebenefits na kahit matagal na kayong hiwalay sya pa din makakakuha😅 ayusin nyo batas nyo wag puro pera. May annulment nga sobrang tagal mahal na sobrang tagal pang maipasa. Halatang pinagkakaperahan lang 😂 #YesToDivorce
Practicing Catholic? Have you read the Bible? This just proves that marriage is not just a mere union but it's a sacred union created by God, an essential foundation of the society that's why the state should protect it. And as a Catholic you should understand that, do more research sir. And it doesn't mean na if you're a Catholic and you go against one of its beliefs means that the Catholic Church should change. Our beliefs should change. There's more depth in the Church, try to explore it sir.
yes to divorce ❤❤❤
It is nonsense not to allow people to re-marry after they separated for good. They simply live and have children with others without being married then. I know a good number of cases personally. And "divine law" has no place in a society. Philippines is not a theocracy ruled by the friars. When somebody wants to follow "divine law", then decide not to separate and not to remarry. As simple as that.
YES NO TO DIVORCE!!!
I totally agree CJ Davide
I am for Divorce.
Woman need happiness too.
We must be free.
If u want to be feee, file for annullment or legal separation. Me anak or mga anak k ba? If wala, that is a ground for annulment. If meron, kasiyahan at kabutohan ba yan ng mga anak mo? Hindi lang ung happiness nila, but also their well being. Hindi ibig sabihin na masaya ka eh, mabuti na para sayo. Ung mga nangangaliwa, masaya din naman. Marriage is not everyday happiness. In the 1st place, it is a commitment.
@@beautifullycreatable di ko ma gets ang logic mo 😂
chief justice davide, thank you for your explanation. we hope maintindihan ng mga pro divorce yang explanation ninyo. #SALUTE
kung di pwde ang divorce bakit may annulment kalokohan..
DAHIL MAS MAGANDA MAY PERA BUSINESS
Never can't be broken eh broken na nga allowed nyo lang ang annulment kac may pera kayo pag annulment pwede na pakasal sa iba. Mas gusto nya pa yata yon madami kumakabit kaysa sa normal na pamilya kaya nalaki population ng pinas dahil wla divorce kung may divorce nabigay sa asawa ang karapatan at takot na mag anak ulit ang lalaki asawa kac wla na sya pag buhay sa pagalawa asawa nya yon ang totoo .mga babaero lang ang d allowed sa divorce kac takot na makuha ng asawa nila ang salary nila.kung d nyo allowed ang divorce free nyo ang annulment yon lang
Davide should also read the mateo, 19:9 that jesus used the, word "except". Meaning divorce is permitted on the ground of sexual immorality or fornication. So, there is an exeption. meaning not absolute to ban divorce but there is an exemption. And also sirach 26 :25 divorce is allowed.
Our law makers are the law breakers nothing new! 😅
Stop using the words sacred, sacrosanct and divine when you don't know the scripture fully!!!
You cannot teach an old dog new tricks.
This old folks are still living 50 years ago. Let them be.
But for us who will shape the future, we must adopt to change!
Legal laws are man made so it can be change by man.
If you want a solid argument then it should be based by nature itself.
yes legal laws can be changed. But you need to change first the constitution bcoz like what Former Chief Justice Davide said, constitution cant be changed just by simple legislation. 🤦🤦
annulment for business , kung my divorce and Pinas pano na ang mga CRoCs pano MAGKAKAPERA, kung may divorce E DI WALA NG MGA KABIT AT MGA BATANG ANAK NG KABIT AT ANG MGA SINGLE MOM NA KABIT ??????
Jesus, not the Catholic Church nor any Pope, created the Divorce Law. No Law Maker on earth has the authority to amend a law. Marriage is not for everyone and nowhere are we commanded to marry. If you choose to get married, you are choosing to enter into a covenant with God and vowing to be faithful to that covenant. This decision therefore should not be taken lightly. God says “it’s better to not make a vow then to make a vow and not keep it.” Eccl 5:5.Since marriage is God’s covenant, man does not decide the terms of the marriage covenant - God does, and God is very specific about those terms. God tells us the duration of the marriage relationship is “till death do us part”. The Apostle Paul says “A married woman is bound to her husband as long as he is alive, but if her husband dies, she is released from the law of marriage Rom 7:2.
Davide is pro israel. He firs in israel thanbin the Philippines.
How can a lawyer be so religious standing up for the bible and not on the social and legal issue?
Thank youu ........,Remember: Dont marry someone if you are only happy and not be committed to a marriage contract. Period. You should always remember you only have one game on your console that is marriage. Logic Dont marry if you are not ready to that logic
Very good but times are changing
Justice Hilario Davide napaka matapobre nyo po.. divorce is for everyone.. annulment and legal separation is only for the rich and powerful like you
Thank you chief justice Davide for defending the Filipino families. NO TO DIVORCE BILL. GOD BLESS OUR COUNTRY.🙏
IKAW LNG BA ANG TAO SA PINAS ?
@@msmayah sa tingin mo ikaw lang din.
DIVORSE is legal matters
Like annulment of marriage.
Daanin na lang kaya sa botohan ang pagpasa ng DIvorse bill.
in Mal 2:6, God said, " I hate divorce."
Sorry, but there are enough people who legally think: "I don't care about what God is said to have said about certain topics."
Para mawala na Ang pang eresponsible na parents, para mawala na Ang pag aboso Ng mga Asawa,, para mawala na Ang mga adict at lasingero at walang trabahu na husband ,, we vote for divorce bill.
Divorce is not the image and identity of Philippines
so ano image at identity ng philippines ?
magkamatayan nalang sa galit at sama ng luob ang dalawang tao na ayaw nang magsama? madamay na buong pamilya, mga anak, tao sa paligid para ipagpilitan ang pagsasama ng dalawang taong ayaw na?
@@phecube may legal separation po
Yes.fanily values must be preserved.kawawa ang mga bata.
Huwag kasing mag asawa agad agad kung hindi ka pa sigurado. Hindi laro ang pagbuo ng pamilya.
Gusto nila annulment kc pang mayaman wawa ang mga mahirap bkit di payagan wala sila alam s paano nag hiram yung mga nag hiwalay
Dapat ipagbawal na rin annulment ganun din naman un e. Divorce at annulment pareho lang na paghihiwalayin ang mag asawa under the law. Ang kaibahan lang ay pangmayaman ung annulment samantalang ung divorce ay para sa lahat. Dapat tingnan nu naman kung fair kau, mga ipokrito.
Divorce will only open an unbearable & filthy can of worms. Meron na tayong annulment at separation of spouses in effect sa bansa natin, bakit pa ginigiit ang divorce?
Dahil napakamahal ng annulment pang mayaman lang ang may kaya nyan,Bkit kayo matatakot sa Dovorce kung mahal naman kayo ng mga partner nyo hindi naman kayo iiwanan nyan ,at kung mag kasundo naman kayo sa tahanan nyo hindi Kyo mag hihiwalay. YESSS to divorce para yung mga naghiway na may kanya kanya ng landas at pamilya eh maging legal na .
sa kweba ka ba nakatira ? bukod sa matagal mahal ang annulment na hindi kaya ng ibang pinoy 😅 wala ka cgurong idea kung magkano no ? may iba na de deny pa 😅 at ang legal separation is non sense 😅
Mayaman ka Kasi kaya gusto mo Ang annulment., separate walang maitutulong Yan baka Sayo Meron sa iba walang bisa
Leave Marriage to symbol after symbol-minded People.
The Bible and the Flag.
Ayaw niyo Ng absolute divorce sa pilipinas pero meron annulment , 😮😮 ayaw niyong I support Ang absolute divorce Kasi libre sa mga walang pera Annulment agree kayo Kasi abot million Ang halaga ay di wow .
Dating Punong Mahistrado Hilario Davide Jr. binigyang-diin ang kahalagahan ng batas sa diborsyo para protektahan ang mga nasa mapang-abusong kasal. Ayon sa kanya, dapat may legal na opsyon para sa mga nasa distressing na sitwasyon ng pag-aasawa.
but now, marriage is becoming a commercial buisness.
God also,said..to separate ourself from immorality..and not even eating in the table with them..Therefore,immorality and adultery is ground of divorce
di lahat ay catholic sa Philippines..kung ayaw nyo ng divorce di huwag kayo...Freedom country ba ang Philippines kung Catholic lang ang susundin..di nmn yan sila Saints at wla sa Bibliya ang religion na catholic
This is what I hate the most when I hear that our universal rights are being argued based on religion!! Because this is a Divisions.
All Religions can and May argue that they have different traditions and customs that may be in favor or anti to a certain topic.
If a kiosk happens because we couldn't find common grounds. Who would judge the issue? Is it the judge that is anti or pro Divorce??
Or maybe we bring the issue to the international criminal court of justice since we cant seems to have a fair trial in The Philippines because if the double standards??
What if I don't believe in religion but I believe in God.
Can I choose a natural judge to hear my case??
pakataw pid ning usa bisaya man untang dako.
Pag simcard registration and patayan Ang bilis Ang divorce lutong luto na kung nd ka abused emotionally and happy marriage ka, divorce is not for you but for others is a must, approved divorce should expedite ASAP!🇵🇭🙏🌈❤️🩹
Thanks CHIEF JUSTICE. For your support the moral issue. NO TO DIVORCE GOD BLESS you and GOD bless the PHILIPPINES Amen
Allow divorce but do not allow remarry.
Nonsense. Then people live together and have children without being married. Is that any better? They already do so now.
TAN DAAN ANG SENADOR NA AYAW SA DIVORCE
What we need is an alternative solution to absolute divorce.
1. Strengthen Support Systems - the state should create and focus on strengthening support systems for families and couples, such as counseling services, financial assistance, and other programs aimed at preventing domestic violence.
2. Reform Annulment and Legal Separation - make the process for legal separation and annulment more accessible and affordable which could provide a balanced solution without introducing absolute divorce.
Conclusion:
While the challenges of marital discord and abuse are real and need to be addressed, the introduction of an absolute divorce law may not be the most effective solution for the Philippines. Several factors, like cultural, social, and economic factors, suggest that maintaining the current system, with potential reforms to improve access to existing legal remedies, better serve the interests of Filipino families and society.