Beautiful system. Must sound absolutely superb. Looks like a very comfortable room to relax and listen to music. Please excuse me. Wish I could speak / understand Mandarin.
Subject to CZcams compression and my system, but surprisingly I thought May > Dave > TAM. On my system, the TAM sounded a little sibilant. May slighted edged out Dave, had some strange open quality where the vocals popped out more than TAM and more of a an auro around them. Dave was very similar to May.
It would be really good if you could put in a more affordable DAC in there to compare such as the high performing Bechmark DAC3. Would be super serious how it compares. Great work !
As a hi-fi enthusiast, I would say that holoaudio has the most accurate resolution and is therefore also the most authentic sounding. Mola Mola comes second and is slightly darker, but the tonal balance is beautiful. Chord Dave is more fuzzy and it blurs the sound a bit, at least in these samples. Of course, if the music changes to more airy pop music and rock music, then chord can be the best. Loud youth music or a young woman's voice recorded in a room doesn't really say anything about DAC. There must be significantly more rhythm and tempo in the movement so that the differences in the dac become clearer.
Tambaqui pour moi et de loin ! Plus naturel avec un meilleur respect de la taille des instruments, pas de voile entre l’auditeur et la musique, la présence dans la pièce est bien meilleure et rend l’écoute plus direct comme si on y était. Plus dynamique aussi, plus d’intention dans le jeu.
Listening to all 3 DACs, there is so little difference between them all. That speaks volumes in the favor of the Holo May. Judging in all criteria , they are all within 95% to 100% of each other.
You'll never hear the true differences between the DACs, when its pushed through CZcams and then re-rendered on whatever DAC you're using (and the same DAC for all comparisons). All that information is lost.
They all have their own sound structure and character. I myself listen and compare these in my living room with genelec dsp/glm studio monitors. And there really are a lot of differences if you listen more. Of course, all three are excellent dacs.
i’m very surprised by this comparison. i was hoping the May would provide the most organic natural sound. however, they all sound fairly similar. they’re detailed and squeaky clean but in an artificial way. they sound sterile. granted a youtube video won’t convey the sound to the fullest, but even thru youtube i’ve heard some great sounding systems. there’s a clear difference between those and this. it’s all preference in the end, and all three of these DACs have plenty of happy users. 😎
They all have their own sound structure and character. I myself listen and compare these in my living room with genelec dsp/glm studio monitors. And there really are a lot of differences if you listen more. Of course, all three are excellent dacs.
Chord Dave sounds disappointing, having that extremely oversampled signature of smoothed-over upper midrange female vocals while leaning out body of the music. If possible, would like May's midrange weight with Tambaqui's treble resolution.
Thanks for this vid! What about a MU1/Tambaqui vs MPD-8? And then just dac only comparison? I have a tambaqui on delivery in a couple days. Pairing it with a Grimm MU1. English subtitles would be great. 👍🏼 Btw that tambaqui sounds so alive.
@@asegal4677 it continues to provide beautiful music to my ears. If you have the means to do so, I do highly recommend putting a MU1 in front of it or any dac for that matter. The beauty in the Tambaqui is truly realized with the MU1
@@labalo5 Thanks! Yes, I have heard that several times. Curious, how (if at all) are you handling CDs in your system? Are you just ripping them to the MU1 or do you have a transport?
@@asegal4677 I’m ripping cds and the SQ is just as good. My SPDIF input on the MU1 is taken up by my tv out and let me tell you, I’ve never heard movies or tv programming sound so good in terms of full bodied-ness, impact and clarity. I’ve downsized and sold off my home theater components. I have a shared space…but the added qualities of reduced jitter is quite impressive passing through the MU1, and then allowing the amazing Tambaqui to process it with ease is pure joy.
I didn’t really like the sound of any of these. Could be the recording. They are all too polite and dull sounding. Suppressed dynamics? Dave sounded best but it was still dull.
MOLA MOLA TAMBAQUI真的好強 除了人聲的曲目 其他我都給了他一票
如果不像草爸擁有這麼多台DAC的話
這台真的是抓到一個很棒平衡點 播什麼樣的音樂都有一定的水準
Holo May NOS模式+ HQPlayer軟體 出DSD1024+HPQ選擇適合歌曲的濾波是梅的實力發揮處，細節和分層和DAVE完全不同世界，可惜沒測，沒記錯的話DAVE只「適合」最高PCM 768Khz
Beautiful system. Must sound absolutely superb. Looks like a very comfortable room to relax and listen to music. Please excuse me. Wish I could speak / understand Mandarin.
評測真棒 謝謝
自身一直玩黑膠，少玩DAC。由於工作繁忙，換碟好煩，開始覺得唔使換碟好處，嘗試找部好DAC玩玩。 不過現在還未有定案😂。 第一次睇草爸介紹。 多謝分享及給予三部機器評論。 草爸揀歌顯示係高手。 每個人五感各有不同，無對錯的。 自身聽人聲，小提琴最多。 Hilary Hahn 我至愛😁😁。 Mola Mola各樣表現最合心水。 不過價最貴。 May DAC唔差，價相對平。 抵買。 不過，玩音響無抵唔抵，祇有好唔好。 頭痛 😒😒
Subject to CZcams compression and my system, but surprisingly I thought May > Dave > TAM. On my system, the TAM sounded a little sibilant. May slighted edged out Dave, had some strange open quality where the vocals popped out more than TAM and more of a an auro around them. Dave was very similar to May.
It would be really good if you could put in a more affordable DAC in there to compare such as the high performing Bechmark DAC3. Would be super serious how it compares.
Great work !
Nice DAC line up, would be great if someone could give short summary of his oppinion on each of them.
As a hi-fi enthusiast, I would say that holoaudio has the most accurate resolution and is therefore also the most authentic sounding. Mola Mola comes second and is slightly darker, but the tonal balance is beautiful. Chord Dave is more fuzzy and it blurs the sound a bit, at least in these samples. Of course, if the music changes to more airy pop music and rock music, then chord can be the best. Loud youth music or a young woman's voice recorded in a room doesn't really say anything about DAC. There must be significantly more rhythm and tempo in the movement so that the differences in the dac become clearer.
感謝草爸的分享, 這次的影片真的看得很過癮, 而且這次的介面讓我覺得做比較更容易讓我做比較, 真的製作很用心! 給你two thumbs up !
個人喜好 tam > dave > may , 草爸選的曲很棒
The chord brought more emotion to the vocal track 2! Felt the song more on Dave then other dac’s.
Tambaqui pour moi et de loin ! Plus naturel avec un meilleur respect de la taille des instruments, pas de voile entre l’auditeur et la musique, la présence dans la pièce est bien meilleure et rend l’écoute plus direct comme si on y était. Plus dynamique aussi, plus d’intention dans le jeu.
Speechless... Simply the best review. Dave rules!
很喜歡第二首mola 對於口氣的詮釋 , 感覺更有情感
Listening to all 3 DACs, there is so little difference between them all. That speaks volumes in the favor of the Holo May. Judging in all criteria , they are all within 95% to 100% of each other.
You'll never hear the true differences between the DACs, when its pushed through CZcams and then re-rendered on whatever DAC you're using (and the same DAC for all comparisons). All that information is lost.
感谢草爸分享，让我有机会听到这些高阶器材的声音，实话说这几台DAC定价都在自己预算之外，但还有什么可以阻挡发烧友的好奇心呢？简单听下来（无线耳塞+从头到尾听一遍，和现场聆听或者用好的耳机回放肯定没法比），厚着脸皮讲讲主观听感：TAMBAQUI的解析力、动态、分离度、规模感最佳，整体感觉是厂家希望尽量还原录音想要呈现的效果，简单来说就是真实、美、平衡；MAY音色微温，中频突出且抓耳，说R2R偏重人声确实有一定道理（当然有句话叫「得中频者得天下」）；DAVE声音偏柔和，速度稍慢些，整体感觉是比较贴近现场之余又融入了厂家的审美。
Great comparison. Small differences in sound of this three DACs. Thank you for your work.
They all have their own sound structure and character. I myself listen and compare these in my living room with genelec dsp/glm studio monitors. And there really are a lot of differences if you listen more. Of course, all three are excellent dacs.
个人感觉CHORD DAVE最好
Thank you! Proper comparison, great stuff!👍
綜合來說，Dave最好（尤其是古典音樂，好太多）, MOLA MOLA TAMBAQUI第二，May第三。
請問我應該怎麼改?預算萬元內 大學生租屋處房東不確定給不給改壁插，現在的無接地孔。 目前是電腦線和充電線和一體機共用一個延長線(占掉四個孔) 。hd660s2耳機>一體機violectric v226>電腦(用串流) 還是有其他能夠獨立作業的耳機訊源接地工程方法?
may的音樂味道非常好啊
內容很棒！🎉期待將來會有一期MSB premier VS Playback MPD-8
真的拜託! 快來一集, MPD8 VS HORIZON VS MSB
I want a MU1 with Tambaqui vs MPD8
@@labalo5 Same here ! I am sure he is going to get to it ! Full respect !
感覺最差是Dave
May 的聲音保守耐聽， 但對於樂器有要求 會覺得不足， mola mola 通透細緻， 穿透力強 但有些位置覺得有些尖
i’m very surprised by this comparison. i was hoping the May would provide the most organic natural sound.
however, they all sound fairly similar. they’re detailed and squeaky clean but in an artificial way. they sound sterile.
granted a youtube video won’t convey the sound to the fullest, but even thru youtube i’ve heard some great sounding systems.
there’s a clear difference between those and this.
it’s all preference in the end, and all three of these DACs have plenty of happy users. 😎
They all have their own sound structure and character. I myself listen and compare these in my living room with genelec dsp/glm studio monitors. And there really are a lot of differences if you listen more. Of course, all three are excellent dacs.
use headphones
Tambaqui wins on dynamics for sure.
1.TAMBAQUI 2.HOLO AUDIO MAY 3.CHORD DAVE DAC
Great test thanks.
录音 ... 不错。
很喜歡草爸的影片 不過都沒字幕必須放大聲點比較遺憾
Tam聲音最自然最好聽。Dave比較猛有數嗎味還不錯。May聲音比較乾和柴感覺不如Denafrips.
Hello please enable auto captions on your channel
哎呀草爸怎麼看Denafrips 終結者 plus 跟 holo 的差異呢? 希望有機會可以加入Mytek manhattan 2
Did you mix any of the tracks yourself?
Chord Dave sounds disappointing, having that extremely oversampled signature of smoothed-over upper midrange female vocals while leaning out body of the music. If possible, would like May's midrange weight with Tambaqui's treble resolution.
手機聆聽
Tam... 比較拆聲，尖 , 動態大，爽快
Holo...小提琴柔，鋼琴啞聲，沉悶
Dave...在上二者之間，琴聲柔和閱耳
Dave泛用性高
Dave sounded harsh.
悲劇 我木耳聽不出來差異😢
Thanks for this vid! What about a MU1/Tambaqui vs MPD-8? And then just dac only comparison?
I have a tambaqui on delivery in a couple days. Pairing it with a Grimm MU1. English subtitles would be great. 👍🏼
Btw that tambaqui sounds so alive.
How are you liking the Tambaqui now that you've had it for a while?
@@asegal4677 it continues to provide beautiful music to my ears. If you have the means to do so, I do highly recommend putting a MU1 in front of it or any dac for that matter. The beauty in the Tambaqui is truly realized with the MU1
@@labalo5 Thanks! Yes, I have heard that several times. Curious, how (if at all) are you handling CDs in your system? Are you just ripping them to the MU1 or do you have a transport?
@@asegal4677 I’m ripping cds and the SQ is just as good. My SPDIF input on the MU1 is taken up by my tv out and let me tell you, I’ve never heard movies or tv programming sound so good in terms of full bodied-ness, impact and clarity. I’ve downsized and sold off my home theater components. I have a shared space…but the added qualities of reduced jitter is quite impressive passing through the MU1, and then allowing the amazing Tambaqui to process it with ease is pure joy.
價差超過3倍a… 梅那個價格還有其他水平相若的選擇嗎？
Denafrips Terminator Plus
holo .. kind of having low high..molo kind of high vocal and fast .. than dave.. high vocal and balanced
Dave sounds a little bit harsh on violin recording (Track 3) ;/
1) MOLA MOLA TAMBAQUI..............!
2) HOLO MAY KTE...
3) CHORD DAVE...
hi . got try rockna...
不知道為什麼R2R的聲音好像沒有尾音。。。
I agree.
@天线宝宝 6:23
@user-gj4hc1wt3o 這抬需要RUN至少500HR 影片完全沒提到,看來是不知道
Dave 不行,声音太硬, 人造声
就让其他人去买欣赏
錄音不太理想
中國的r2r細節層次都很差 denafrips和holo都一樣
台灣的更是一個像樣的dac沒有
Holo may 聲音分離度差，很悶的聲音表現，TAMBAQUI, 很大氣開揚，有動態，有速度，
听过边上的蓝波地平线，这三台听都听不下了
What's 蓝波地平线?
@@freelancer1499lampizator dac
@@chieng50 nice. which model did u compare with, Amber 4?
I didn’t really like the sound of any of these. Could be the recording. They are all too polite and dull sounding. Suppressed dynamics? Dave sounded best but it was still dull.
@@JeremyHughes-c8qwhat dac are you using ?
holo may>mmt> dave
期待有dCS Vivaldi的評價