Future Wars: Will there be another Bosnian war?
Vložit
- čas přidán 31. 08. 2022
- The Bosnian War was one of the deadliest European conflicts since the Second World War.
Tens of thousands were killed, and around two million people displaced, between 1992 and 1995.
The bloody, bitter war ended nearly three decades ago, but many of the underlying issues that led to it are still there.
So - could there be another war?
Future Wars is a new series for Sky News, examining potential flashpoints and conflicts around the world. Episodes will be coming out every Friday for the next few weeks.
SUBSCRIBE to our CZcams channel for more videos: / skynews
Follow us on Twitter: / skynews
Like us on Facebook: / skynews
Follow us on Instagram: / skynews
Follow us on TikTok: / skynews
For more content go to news.sky.com and download our apps:
Apple: itunes.apple.com/gb/app/sky-n...
Android play.google.com/store/apps/de...
Sky News videos are now available in Spanish here/Los video de Sky News están disponibles en español aquí czcams.com/channels/yne.html...
Sky News videos are also available in German here/Hier können Sie außerdem Sky News-Videos auf Deutsch finden: / @skynewsaufdeutsch6058
To enquire about licensing Sky News content, you can find more information here: news.sky.com/info/library-sales
![Eminem - Houdini [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/22tVWwmTie8/mqdefault.jpg)
The guns stopped firing in 1995. The conflict hasn't stopped though.
Dayton Accords, peace agreement reached on Nov. 21, 1995, by the presidents of Bosnia, Croatia, and Serbia, ending the war in Bosnia and outlining a General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina. It preserved Bosnia as a single state made up of two parts, the Bosniak-Croat federation and the Bosnian Serb Republic, with Sarajevo remaining as the undivided capital city.
(Read Britannica’s biography of this author, President Bill Clinton.)
The agreement is known as the Dayton Accords because the negotiations took place at the Wright-Patterson Air Force Base outside Dayton, Ohio. The process was led by Richard Holbrooke, who was the chief U.S. peace negotiator, and Secretary of State Warren Christopher.
Still, there were people on the front recording. Special units used a technique called “sound ranging” to try and determine where enemy gunfire was coming from. To do so, technicians set up strings of microphones-actually barrels of oil dug into the ground-a certain distance apart, then used a piece of photographic film to visually record noise intensity. The effect is similar to the way a seismometer records an earthquake. Using that data and the time between when a shot was fired and when it hit, they could then triangulate where enemy artillery was located-and adjust their own guns accordingly.
At least one bit of that “sound ranging” film survived the War-the film recording the last few minutes of World War I when the guns finally fell silent at the River Moselle on the American Front. As Richard Connor at Deutsche Welde reports, part of a new exhibit called Making a New World at London’s Imperial War Museum uses those graphic sound waves to recreate the moment the Armistice went into effect and the guns fell silent.
As part of a celebration to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the end of the war,
Still, there were people on the front recording. Special units used a technique called “sound ranging” to try and determine where enemy gunfire was coming from. To do so, technicians set up strings of microphones-actually barrels of oil dug into the ground-a certain distance apart, then used a piece of photographic film to visually record noise intensity. The effect is similar to the way a seismometer records an earthquake. Using that data and the time between when a shot was fired and when it hit, they could then triangulate where enemy artillery was located-and adjust their own guns accordingly.
At least one bit of that “sound ranging” film survived the War-the film recording the last few minutes of World War I when the guns finally fell silent at the River Moselle on the American Front. As Richard Connor at Deutsche Welde reports, part of a new exhibit called Making a New World at London’s Imperial War Museum uses those graphic sound waves to recreate the moment the Armistice went into effect and the guns fell silent.
As part of a celebration to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the end of the war,
Still, there were people on the front recording. Special units used a technique called “sound ranging” to try and determine where enemy gunfire was coming from. To do so, technicians set up strings of microphones-actually barrels of oil dug into the ground-a certain distance apart, then used a piece of photographic film to visually record noise intensity. The effect is similar to the way a seismometer records an earthquake. Using that data and the time between when a shot was fired and when it hit, they could then triangulate where enemy artillery was located-and adjust their own guns accordingly.
At least one bit of that “sound ranging” film survived the War-the film recording the last few minutes of World War I when the guns finally fell silent at the River Moselle on the American Front. As Richard Connor at Deutsche Welde reports, part of a new exhibit called Making a New World at London’s Imperial War Museum uses those graphic sound waves to recreate the moment the Armistice went into effect and the guns fell silent.
As part of a celebration to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the end of the war,
Still, there were people on the front recording. Special units used a technique called “sound ranging” to try and determine where enemy gunfire was coming from. To do so, technicians set up strings of microphones-actually barrels of oil dug into the ground-a certain distance apart, then used a piece of photographic film to visually record noise intensity. The effect is similar to the way a seismometer records an earthquake. Using that data and the time between when a shot was fired and when it hit, they could then triangulate where enemy artillery was located-and adjust their own guns accordingly.
At least one bit of that “sound ranging” film survived the War-the film recording the last few minutes of World War I when the guns finally fell silent at the River Moselle on the American Front. As Richard Connor at Deutsche Welde reports, part of a new exhibit called Making a New World at London’s Imperial War Museum uses those graphic sound waves to recreate the moment the Armistice went into effect and the guns fell silent.
As part of a celebration to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the end of the war,
Why do i feel this guy wants to get us in another war
until every last racist is defeated and subjugated
Of course ! All psychopaths
@@stequality And here we are after 31 Years Later.
£££££££ the elite make billions off of the back of our sol diers or soul die rs
That is western government and media job, it's their job to put here fear and to try to make another war.
The war never finished. That's the problem.
True, the Americans just decided to hit pause in 1995 instead.
@@tarik6990 tell your people to wake up. Enemies on all sides yet have people like Fikret in your history 😆
@@MH-jg6vk I am telling my peopel to wake up every day, believe me. Ultimately, if we are doubt enough to keep making the same mistake over and over again then we ultimately do not deserve to survive as a nation.
@@tarik6990 if there is another one, and another there inevitably will be, then it will either be the end to serb claims or the end of your existence. Let the Bosniaks keep partying and dancing as they did right until it came on their doorstep, too little too late…
@@tarik6990 the war is only paused, now the continuation is waiting, civilians should leave Bosnia for some time
We have seen many War's, but the Yugoslavian are in many ways different. More brutal, more tribal and more personal.
It is not war one is not having arm while one is having Yugoslavia army
It was especially cruel because brothers fought brothers... I hope it won't repeat...
and it was very unfair.. Its like when the German Might attacked Poland who had an ill equipped army, a very similar situation just that half of Europe declared war on Germany back then after they attacked Poland..
Cedric Thornberry was director of UNPROFOR Civil Affairs at the beginning of the mission in February 1992. By the end of its first mandate in March 1993, UNPROFOR had some success in restoring peace in Croatia, notably obtaining the removal of the Yugoslav People's Army (JNA) in May 1992.
Their goal was to help the civilians trapped by the fighting and deliver humanitarian aid. A major part of the operation was to open the airport in Sarajevo so supplies could be flown in. In July 1992, as Canadian peacekeepers protected the airport and escorted relief convoys, they often came under fire.22-Feb-2023
Their goal was to help the civilians trapped by the fighting and deliver humanitarian aid. A major part of the operation was to open the airport in Sarajevo so supplies could be flown in. In July 1992, as Canadian peacekeepers protected the airport and escorted relief convoys, they often came under fire.22-Feb-2023
Top contributors of troops to UN peacekeeping efforts globally in 2022. At December 2022, Bangladesh was contributing 7,233 soldiers to United Nations peacekeeping missions, the highest number of any country.13-Mar-2023
India is the fifth largest troop contributor (TCC) with 5,323 personnel deployed in 8 out of 13 active UN Peacekeeping Missions, of which 166 are police personnel. India ranks third after Bangladesh (7,237) and Nepal (6,264) in troops contribution.
The largest UN mission globally as of February 2022 was the United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS) with more than 15,000 military personnel.30-May-2022
On 4 February 2003, following the adoption and promulgation of the Constitutional Charter of Serbia and Montenegro by the Assembly of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, the official name of " Federal Republic of Yugoslavia" was changed to Serbia and Montenegro.
No people don’t want war. They want an end to the political corruption that is stopping the country from moving forward economically. While current system is in place Bosnia the best and brightest will continue to leave Bosnia for Europe.
They will leave for the European Union, Bosnia is already in Europe.
Some people do.
@@mdaneilisaac A lot more than naive people might think want war.
@@tarik6990 Billions of dollar not so naive for some ppl
@@mdaneilisaac Indeed.
The Bosnian Serbs will never have the same favorable conditions as 1992. If a new war was to erupt the Serbs would suffer much more than before simply due to the power dynamic within Bosnia and the fact the Bosnian serbs have no army and do not have Yugoslavia supporting them as 1992.
In case of a new war, the Bosnian Serbs would have support from Serbia which is armed to the teeth.
@@tarik6990 yes but that would put serbia under heavy sanctions for invading a country, potentially lead to new NATO bombings and also Serbia would be fair game for Bosnian army attacks on border towns and cities via artillery that can hit 40-60 kilometers away which Bosnia produces such long distances shells domestically. Also, serbia today has 1million less people and on average a much older population so any massive war would be much harder for Serbia to conduct unlike in the early 1990s.
@@baklava6138 Serbia would only be fair game for the Bosnian army attacks on the border if the Bosnian army was actually prepared for a potential war which they aren't. In case of a Bosnian army attack in the smaller entity, Serbia's reply would be immediate and NATO, the Americans or the EU would intervene in Bosnian Serbs favor.
@@tarik6990 Bosnia is ready, they have the arms industry, the official armed forces which would be increased to 100-200 thousand within months… it may not look like it now but the capacity is there. Plus rs had no army and serbia only has 36k troops many of which are women and not infantry. So they too would need to mobilize. In 1992-1995 all of yugoslavia was helping bosnian serbs and croatia was also fighting bosnia yet the state did not wave a white flag. The conditions today cannot be worse than back then.
Serbs had an army and the still have mich better police force, also serbian population is growing while bosnian is shrinking.In the last month or so, serbs gained 50+ people while bosniaks lost 450+.
In this quiss still i have finished future war sir or shall i start from here
I am Spanish. My significant other is a Bosnian Croat.
Been there and everything seems peaceful but that peace is somehow a tense peace.
They don't want war again but the wounds of the conflict will last forever.
No such thing as a "bosnian croat", that is just a catholic ethnic yugoslav, who lived in bosnia. Tell your SO to stop spreading lies.
@@owlofathena1247 What about Bosnian Servs and muslims who live in Bosnia where did they come from? Asia minor?
Its not good when foreigners like this come here, make this videos, that was introduction similiar in 90s. Here is always hot and when someione give some oil aditional here we go - conflict.
It will be when big countries want it.
Peace through strength. I would think that since 1996 BiH has accumulated arms to prevent the atrocities that were inflicted upon them during the siege. Not to be the aggressor, but to protect their sovereignty. Peace to all the independent countries of The Balkans.
Bosnia has one joint army but that army represents 3 ethnic groups in Bosnia. This was a mistake, as its the same set up as in former Yugoslavia. The Yugoslav army was supposed to represent all the Yugoslav ethnic groups except the Serbian Generals were in control.
Who has the control of the "Bosnian" army now?
@@northernstar4811 not a mistake probably it was intended for the balkan to not have peace created by the americans
Its not that simple
@۞ عبد الله ۞ true we will support In Sha Allaah
@۞ عبد الله ۞ xxx count me in
This time they are not alone!
Thank u Sir
10:18 is not video from Bosnian war.
i guess it is filmed in Keraterm or Manjaca, concentration camps
Those who instigated the break up of Ygoslavia now have to deal with the consequences....
Yes these western media will never mention how USA used the IMF to destroy the Socialist Yugoslavia
not true, bosnia separated after slovenia and croatia
croatia and slovenia cleansed their teritory from serbs thats why there isnt the same threat
This video representing only one side as victims, hahahaha. This is why people on this world don't know anything about true happening in Bosnian war and politics later.
Then can u answer others to u
Bosnian War, ethnically rooted war (1992-95) in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a former republic of Yugoslavia with a multiethnic population comprising Bosniaks (Bosnian Muslims), Serbs, and Croats. After years of bitter fighting that involved the three Bosnian groups as well as the Yugoslav army, Western countries with backing by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) imposed a final cease-fire negotiated at Dayton, Ohio, U.S., in 1995.
Background
Yugoslavia, 1919-92
Yugoslavia, 1919-92
In 1946 the People’s Republic (from 1963, Socialist Republic) of Bosnia and Herzegovina became one of the constituent republics of the Federal People’s (from 1963, Socialist Federal) Republic of Yugoslavia, and life in Bosnia and Herzegovina underwent all the social, economic, and political changes that were imposed on the whole of Yugoslavia by its new communist government. Bosnia and Herzegovina was particularly affected by the abolition of many traditional Muslim institutions, such as Qurʾānic primary schools, rich charitable foundations, and Dervish religious orders. However, a change of official policy in the 1960s led to the acceptance of “Muslim” as a term denoting a national identity: the phrase “Muslim in the ethnic sense” was used in the 1961 census, and in 1968 the Bosnian Central Committee decreed that “the Muslims are a distinct nation.” By 1971 Muslims formed the largest single component of the Bosnian population. During the next 20 years the Serb and Croat populations fell in absolute terms as many Serbs and Croats emigrated. In the 1991 census Muslims made up more than two-fifths of the Bosnian population, while Serbs made up slightly less than one-third and Croats one-sixth. From the mid-1990s the term Bosniak replaced Muslim as the name Bosnian Muslims use for themselves.
In the 1980s the rapid decline of the Yugoslav economy led to widespread public dissatisfaction with the political system. That attitude, together with the manipulation of nationalist feelings by politicians, destabilized Yugoslav politics. Independent political parties appeared by 1989. In early 1990, multiparty elections were held in Slovenia and Croatia. When elections were held in Bosnia and Herzegovina in December, new parties representing the three national communities gained seats in rough proportion to their populations. A tripartite coalition government was formed, with the Bosniak politician Alija Izetbegović leading a joint presidency. Growing tensions both inside and outside Bosnia and Herzegovina, however, made cooperation with the Serb Democratic Party, led by Radovan Karadžić, increasingly difficult.
In 1991 several self-styled “Serb Autonomous Regions” were declared in areas of Bosnia and Herzegovina with large Serb populations. Evidence emerged that the Yugoslav People’s Army was being used to send secret arms deliveries to the Bosnian Serbs from Belgrade (Serbia). In August the Serb Democratic Party began boycotting the Bosnian presidency meetings, and in October it removed its deputies from the Bosnian assembly and set up a “Serb National Assembly” in Banja Luka. By then full-scale war had broken out in Croatia, and the breakup of Yugoslavia was under way. Bosnia and Herzegovina’s position became highly vulnerable. The possibility of partitioning Bosnia and Herzegovina had been discussed during talks between the Croatian president, Franjo Tudjman, and the Serbian president, Slobodan Milošević, earlier in the year, and two Croat “communities” in northern and southwestern Bosnia and Herzegovina, similar in some ways to the “Serb Autonomous Regions,” were proclaimed in November 1991.
@@arundavid8231 it is very long story, and no one cares. No one cared in that time, no one cares today also. It is waste of time.
Dont forget to say "And American penetration through IMF in support of extreme nationalism and financial relief is the states split from the Socialist Yugoslavia"!
IMF Approves Membership of Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and US$151 Million in Emergency Post-Conflict Assistance
DEC 20 2000
The Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) today determined that the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY) has fulfilled the necessary conditions to succeed to the membership of the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRY) in the IMF. The FRY's quota in the IMF will amount to SDR 467.7 million (about $604 million). With the succession of the FRY, effective December 14, 1992,1 IMF membership now totals 183 countries.
The Board also approved a loan equivalent to SDR 116.9 million (about US$151 million) under the IMF's policy on emergency post-conflict assistance in support of a program to stabilize the FRY's economy and help rebuild administrative capacities. Of this amount, the authorities will draw SDR101.1 million (about US$130 million) to repay the bridge loans they received to eliminate arrears with the IMF.
Following the Executive Board discussion, Stanley Fischer, First Deputy Managing Director and Acting Chairman, said:
"Executive Directors welcomed FRY's succession to membership in the Fund as an important step in its reintegration into the world economy and the international community, which will be of considerable help to the country in addressing its difficult problems.
"The FRY authorities face the complicated task of stabilizing and reviving a devastated economy after years of regional conflicts, international isolation, and economic mismanagement. Against the background of a sharp acceleration of inflation in recent months, the authorities have appropriately focused on the need to prevent financial instability from adding to the difficulty of this task. Accordingly, the short-term macroeconomic strategy aims, through limiting the growth of credit, to bring inflation under control.
"Directors welcomed recent measures to streamline the exchange system as well as the authorities' intention to introduce a managed float with current account convertibility by January 1, 2001, so as to allow the exchange rate to better reflect market conditions.
"Strengthening the underlying fiscal position and preventing a further accumulation of expenditure arrears will be critical in attaining and preserving financial stability. This will require prioritization of expenditures, improvements in tax administration, and a widening of the tax base by eliminating tax exemptions, as well as bringing the gray economy into the tax net.
"Directors welcomed the authorities' intention to adopt a comprehensive program of stabilization and reform that could be supported by the Fund under an upper credit tranche program. This will need to be preceded by progress in stabilizing the economy and in strengthening the institutional and administrative capacities, under the current program. Technical assistance is expected to make a significant contribution to this process.
"Achievement of a viable balance of payments position will be a challenging task. In addition to prudent macroeconomic policies and bold structural reforms, it will require a restructuring of FRY's external debt on appropriate terms, including early resolution of arrears to the World Bank, and substantial support, following the regularization of arrears, from external donors and creditors," Mr. Fischer said.
Sod Bosnia. I've been waiting for the War Of The Roses to restart since 1487.
The English Civil War Sir.
It's coming soon...
Preserving the memories of the siege
The siege of Sarajevo by the Serbian army was the longest one in recorded human history. It left many scars on Sarajevans and on their city, but not all of the Sarajevo Roses have been preserved. In the 20 years since the war, Sarajevo has been rebuilt; however, the reconstruction filled in and covered up many of the Sarajevo Roses. Thus, families of the victims of the siege are mounting an effort to preserve the Sarajevo Roses so that the truth can continue to be preserved and protected from being forgotten.
Nearly 200 citizens gathered in Sarajevo on Thursday to mark the 21st anniversary of the massacre that happened at the Markale street market on Feb. 5, 1994, when shells fired from surrounding hills killed 68 civilians and injured 144.
At the remembrance gathering, people laid flowers on the remaining Sarajevo Rose. The one at the Markale market is one of few that have been preserved.
Melita Dokic, whose 17-year old daughter, Maja, was killed on April 9, 1995, while returning home from basketball practice, met the Anadolu Agency team in the city center to show where there a Sarajevo Rose was once located, but has since been covered by asphalt during the renovation of intersection
Talking about how bad nationalism is and how we need to be better then goes out and finds the most nationalist guy in Bosnia to interview to see the future of BiH
The General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina, also known as the Dayton Agreement or the Dayton Accords (Croatian: Daytonski sporazum,[2] Bosnian and Serbian: Dejtonski mirovni sporazum / Дејтонски мировни споразум), is the peace agreement reached at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base near Dayton, Ohio, United States, on 21 November 1995, and formally signed in Paris, on 14 December 1995. These accords put an end to the three-and-a-half-year-long Bosnian War, which was part of the much larger Yugoslav Wars.
The warring parties agreed to peace and to a single sovereign state known as Bosnia and Herzegovina composed of two parts, the largely Serb-populated Republika Srp
Marko Attila Hoare, a Balkan historian explained it perfectly: 'Serb/Croat nationalist worldview regarding BiH rests on belief in supremacy of ethnic over civic nationhood; that a nation-state cannot belong to its citizens equally but must belong to one ethnonational group alone, with minorities having inferior status in their own country.'
As long as this primitive mindset continues, another war can happen at any moment. Those who fail to acknowledge this agree to be complicit. The EU, the US and OHR are also complicit in all of this because they tend to appease fascists while lecturing normal people about human rights, democracy and rule of law.
Cope
Bosnia, the formerly Christian majority "Islamic state".
That being said, what happened in Bosnia was a tragedy.
@@ineshvaladolenc6559 Bosnia is not an islamic state and was never Christian majority.
@@tarik6990 We literally have Yugoslavian and Austro-Hungarian population censuses. It shows that the first time muslims actually became a majority in Bosnia is 1971. Religion census documents in Yugoslavia clearly prove this. Christians were a majority in Bosnia all the way until 1971.
@@ceroid3752 The Christian population in Bosnia never exceeded 44% prior to 1971 so it's not a majority. In fact it's not even half.
There will be no war, because there is nobody left to fight. All the young people have already escaped to EU countries and live their lives. Nobody of them would return to fight. Appart of that on contrary to the 90s neither Croatia nor Serbia wants a war in Bosnia.
True, instead there will be an invasion. Merhaba
Croatia and Serbia both DEFINITELY want a war in Bosnia, their politicians talk about it very openly and regularly issue threats to Bosniaks.
there will sadly bee.. , indeed Syrian refugees in the ranks of Bosnian Muslims, and the Bosnian Muslim radical society in the European Union calls on the bosnian muslim population to take up arms and start a new war, there will be a host of volunteers on each side, for example, to wrestle from Croatia for the Croats in Bosnia, Serbs from Serbia for Serbs in bosnian, turks and syrian iraqi refugees for muslims in bosnia
@@samonaprid7782 There is no 'Bosnian Muslim radical society' in the European Union calling on anyone to take up arms just like there are no Syrian refugees in Bosnia calling on anyone to take up arms. The only ones who's interest it is to take up arms are Serbs so they can finish what they started 30 years ago.
@@tarik6990 yes, look at their Facebook posts, there are also Syrian Iraqi refugees who mostly settled in Sarajevo
Türkiye will not allow any other war we will keep the peace between Bosnia and serbia ❤
Turkey should mind its business
'Compromise is the key aspect to moving forward.'
Maybe Bosniaks should have taken that advice in 1991 where they didn't want to hear of even the most modest autonomy for the other two nations, and tried to form an independent state without the consent of one of them.
I’ve been going to Serbia for yearsss, met so many lovely people.. Unfortunately WHENEVER this is talked about they ONLY talk about the bombings, nowhere talking about what actually happened before which led up to the bombings!
For the most part, they do not care about other victims of crimes, they only care when Serbs are affected. What happened during the Bosnian war cannot in any realistic and fair way be compared to a mere 78 days of bombings in Serbia.
of course- if they committed a huge war crime , with mass murder and rape and still failed in their aims, then they obviously would not talk about their guilt
@@ks-qu4kj Serbs didn't fail entirely in their aims, that's the thing. Croats on the other hand did but both will still lie extensively about what happened during the war.
@@tarik6990 yes indeed.... it is ironic to see european nations pumping weapons and support to ukraine when attacked by Russia, but while the whole world could see the aggression that happened in Bosnia (from1992-95) they applied sanctions and stopped any military support reaching Bosnian army , while the bosnian serbs and bosnian croats were getting plenty of weapons from their supporters
@@ks-qu4kj I don't think Bosnian Serbs and especially Bosnian Croats were getting plenty of weapons from their supporters, they already had plenty of weapons before the war due to JNA and being better prepared. They'll of course lie and say the Bosnian army was heavily armed but we all know that's not true.
There's no such thing as bosnian war, it was war in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
The Bosnian War[a] (Serbo-Croatian: Rat u Bosni i Hercegovini / Рат у Босни и Херцеговини) was an international armed conflict that took place in Bosnia and Herzegovina between 1992 and 1995. The war is commonly seen as having started on 6 April 1992, following a number of earlier violent incidents. The war ended on 14 December 1995 when the Dayton accords were signed. The main belligerents were the forces of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina, those of Republic of Herzeg-Bosnia and Republika Srpska, proto-states led and supplied by Croatia and Serbia, respectively.[12][13]
The war was part of the breakup of Yugoslavia. Following the Slovenian and Croatian secessions from the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia in 1991, the multi-ethnic Socialist Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina - which was inhabited by mainly Muslim Bosniaks (44%), Orthodox Serbs (32.5%) and Catholic Croats (17%) - passed a referendum for independence on 29 February 1992. Political representatives of the Bosnian Serbs boycotted the referendum, and rejected its outcome. Anticipating the outcome of the referendum, the Assembly of the Serb People in Bosnia and Herzegovina adopted the Constitution of the Serbian Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina on 28 February 1992. Following Bosnia and Herzegovina's declaration of independence (which gained international recognition) and following the withdrawal of Alija Izetbegović from the previously signed Cutileiro Plan[14] (which proposed a division of Bosnia into ethnic cantons), the Bosnian Serbs, led by Radovan Karadžić and supported by the Serbian regime of Slobodan Milošević and the Yugoslav People's Army (JNA), mobilised their forces inside Bosnia and Herzegovina in order to secure ethnic Serb territory. Then war soon spread across the country, accompanied by ethnic cleansing.
The conflict was initially between Yugoslav Army units in Bosnia which later transformed into the Army of Republika Srpska (VRS) on the one side, and the Army of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina (ARBiH), largely composed of Bosniaks, and the Croat forces in the Croatian Defence Council (HVO) on the other side. Tensions between Croats and Bosniaks increased throughout late 1992, resulting in the escalation of the Croat-Bosniak War in early 1993.[15] The Bosnian War was characterised by bitter fighting, indiscriminate shelling of cities and towns, ethnic cleansing, and systematic mass rape, mainly perpetrated by Serb,[16] and to a lesser extent, Croat[17] and Bosniak[18] forces. Events such as the siege of Sarajevo and the Srebrenica massacre later became iconic of the conflict.
The Serbs, although initially militarily superior due to the weapons and resources provided by the JNA, eventually lost momentum as the Bosniaks and Croats allied against the Republika Srpska in 1994 with the creation of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina following the Washington agreement. Pakistan ignored the UN's ban on supply of arms, and airlifted anti tank missiles to the Bosnian Muslims, while after the Srebrenica and Markale massacres, NATO intervened in 1995 with Operation Deliberate Force targeting the positions of the Army of the Republika Srpska, which proved key in ending the war.[19][20] The war ended after the signing of the General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina in Paris on 14 December 1995. Peace negotiations were held in Dayton, Ohio, and were finalised on 21 November 1995.[21]
By early 2008, the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia convicted forty-five Serbs, twelve Croats, and four Bosniaks of war crimes in connection with the war in Bosnia.[22][needs update] Estimates suggest around 100,000 people were killed during the war.[23][24][25] Over 2.2 million people were displaced,[26] making it, at the time, the most devastating conflict in Europe since the end of World War II.[27][28] In addition, an estimated 12,000-50,000 women were raped, mainly carried out by Serb forces, with most of the victims being Bosniak women.[29][30]
54% are Bosniaks , 30% are bosnian Serbs and 10 % are bosnian Croats, 6% are mixed ore bosnian Jews and bosnian Roma ( Gipsys) .
More than 96% of population of Bosnia and Herzegovina belongs to one of its three autochthonous constituent peoples (Serbo-Croatian: konstitutivni narodi / конститутивни народи): Bosniaks, Serbs and Croats. The term constituent refers to the fact that these three ethnic groups are explicitly mentioned in the constitution, and that none of them can be considered a minority or immigrant. The most easily recognisable feature that distinguishes the three ethnic groups is their religion, with Bosniaks predominantly Muslim, Serbs predominantly Eastern Orthodox, and Croats Catholic.
Bosniaks, Croats, and Serbs speak the Shtokavian dialect of a pluricentric language known in linguistics as Serbo-Croatian. The question of standard language is resolved in such a way that three constituent peoples have their educational and cultural institutions in the standard varieties which are considered official languages at sub-state levels: Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian.
A Y chromosome haplogroups study published in 2005 found that "three main groups of Bosnia-Herzegovina, in spite of some quantitative differences, share a large fraction of the same ancient gene pool distinctive for the Balkan area". The study did however find that Serbs and Bosniaks are genetically closer to each other than either of them is to Croats.[1]
My grandma and grandpa are from Bosnia
Things are not good today in Bosnia. We live in fear especially with the meetings regarding the genocide in Srebrenica.
I am from Bosnia.This....is catastrophie
As a result of the Washington Agreement, among the foreign ministers of the United States, Britain, France, Spain and Russia, the survival of Bosnia-Herzegovina and its people today hangs by a thread. The catastrophe now impending must be averted, for the sake not only of the victims but of us all. Fascism must not be allowed to triumph again in Europe.
Milosevic’s Serbia started the war in Bosnia-Herzegovina with the deliberate aim of destroying it as a sovereign state. But the destruction of Bosnia involves transforming the vast majority of its population-probably as many as three million people-into refugees. Already, 40 percent of Bosnia’s Croats have left the country and many more will follow. Tens of thousands of Serbs have also been forced out. As for the Muslims of Bosnia, their future is even bleaker: they are faced with genocide. For the first time since World War II, a European nation is being destroyed before the eyes and with the acquiescence of Europe and the world. Territorial expansionism in the name of blood and soil, the forced deportation of whole peoples and the destruction of their cultural inheritance, systematic atrocities-such acts bear all the hallmarks of twentieth-century fascism. Defeated at great cost half a century ago, this is being allowed a comeback in Europe today by the very states that once formed the victorious anti-fascist alliance.
Nobody has the right to deprive a people of its national home and cultural inheritance, its human and civil rights, its life and property-and get away with it. As Croats, we feel that this is no altruistic declaration on our part, for in defending the state and people of Bosnia-Herzegovina we defend also our own rights and the future of Croatia. Historical experience has taught us what incalculable dangers fascism carries for peace and stability in our continent.
As a result of the Washington Agreement, among the foreign ministers of the United States, Britain, France, Spain and Russia, the survival of Bosnia-Herzegovina and its people today hangs by a thread. The catastrophe now impending must be averted, for the sake not only of the victims but of us all. Fascism must not be allowed to triumph again in Europe.
Milosevic’s Serbia started the war in Bosnia-Herzegovina with the deliberate aim of destroying it as a sovereign state. But the destruction of Bosnia involves transforming the vast majority of its population-probably as many as three million people-into refugees. Already, 40 percent of Bosnia’s Croats have left the country and many more will follow. Tens of thousands of Serbs have also been forced out. As for the Muslims of Bosnia, their future is even bleaker: they are faced with genocide. For the first time since World War II, a European nation is being destroyed before the eyes and with the acquiescence of Europe and the world. Territorial expansionism in the name of blood and soil, the forced deportation of whole peoples and the destruction of their cultural inheritance, systematic atrocities-such acts bear all the hallmarks of twentieth-century fascism. Defeated at great cost half a century ago, this is being allowed a comeback in Europe today by the very states that once formed the victorious anti-fascist alliance.
Nobody has the right to deprive a people of its national home and cultural inheritance, its human and civil rights, its life and property-and get away with it. As Croats, we feel that this is no altruistic declaration on our part, for in defending the state and people of Bosnia-Herzegovina we defend also our own rights and the future of Croatia. Historical experience has taught us what incalculable dangers fascism carries for peace and stability in our continent.
There is little doubt that the Western states and Russia share the main blame for the Bosnian catastrophe, because their “peacekeeping” has amounted to little more than appeasement of Milosevic and his criminal policies. They are responsible for the Bosnian tragedy not only by default-by failing to protect a member of the United Nations, in accordance with the Charter they themselves drafted at the end of World War II-but also actively, by imposing and maintaining an arms embargo that prevents the victim from defending itself. In this way they have become directly complicit in the crimes committed daily against the Bosnian population. The world cannot stand by and pretend this has nothing to do with us. We call upon political parties, trade unions, churches, civic organizations, opinion-makers and individual citizens in these countries to do their utmost to force their governments to alter their policies and come to the aid of the state and people of Bosnia-Herzegovina.
War is eternal
Next question: will there be a 3rd world war?
More Muslim countries should send in their forces preemptively to support B&H. EU/US/NATO take their time until it is too late.
Nato doesnt care about Muslims
I agree. I am from Bangladesh and I can certainly say this we will come to Bosnia if Serbs try to do any harm to Bosnia
As an American I would happily fight for the Bosniaks.
The strongest will survive.
No, there will be no Bosnian war if democratic principles are implemented, which are not. First of all this is just a story, on the ground it is ok, it’s not anyway close to war, nor any side has the recources that everybody had 30 years ago.
30 years ago it was different. But now Sarajevo is the same as London, and Republika Srpska is like Scotland. If Sarajevo acts just like London did in 2014. there will be no problem.
Serbs want democracy now but hate the west? Democracy would be 1 president not 3. Serbs need to go back to Serbia jf they dislike it
The international community was gravely unprepared for the conflicts that followed the dissolution of Yugoslavia. In particular, it neglected the challenge of Bosnia.
Europe alone was not enough to bring peace, and the United States went from disinterested to disruptive and finally to decisive for a credible peace process. Russia in those days was a constructive actor.
The war in Bosnia lasted years longer than it should have more because of the divisions between outside powers than because of the divisions within the country and the region itself.
The fundamentals of the Dayton Agreement in 1995 were not too dissimilar from what had been discussed, but not pursued, prior to the outbreak of the war. It is a solution that is closer to the reality of Belgium than to the reality of Cyprus.
After the war, many political leaders in Bosnia saw peace as the continuation of the war by other means, which has seriously hampered economic and social progress.
Ultimately, it will be difficult to sustain progress for Bosnia or the region without a credible and clear EU accession process.
K If don't trust sent ur person whom u trust
Am from bosnia and her...
I sincerely hope NOT! It was awful enough in the early 90s also the EU was bloody useless, the French General Lt Gen Bernard Janvier left Srebrenica to the Bosnian Serbs knowing full well what they were going to do-then dared to blame the Dutch battalion at Potocari
The question many need to think about is - "why can't Serb region separate from Bosnia?" what's the benefit to keep people who dislike each other under the same roof? for so long?
'Why did Serbs commit genocide, war crimes and ethnic cleansing to get their ethnically pure territory over half of Bosnia?' would be a much more appropriate question than your wishful whataboutism.
Why cant republican States in USA just separate from democratic states in UsA 🤔. Almost like it doesnt work like that
Because it historically belongs to Bosnia. That’s why
Because Bosniaks want ultimately to occupy those lands and ethnically cleanse the Serbs from them, that's why.
Yes. 8 months.
By Paul Kirby in London & Katya Adler in Lappeenranta, Finland
BBC News
Finland's bid to join Nato has finally secured the backing of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan.
Turkey had blocked Finland's application for months, complaining it had supported "terrorists".
At a press conference in Ankara with his Finnish counterpart, Mr Erdogan praised Finland's "authentic and concrete steps" on Turkish security.
Any Nato expansion needs the support of all its members - and Finland is now a step closer to joining.
A vote will go to Turkey's parliament to approve its application.
Finland, which neighbours Russia, applied with Sweden to join the West's defensive alliance last May.
Both were held up by Turkish objections - but Mr Erdogan is still refusing to support Sweden. Finland has decided to push ahead alone.
The blue carpet was rolled out for Finland's President Sauli Niinisto as he arrived at the presidential palace in pouring rain.
But President Erdogan's hostility to Sweden was clear as the two leaders addressed reporters. He said Sweden had embraced Kurdish militants, labelling them "terrorists". He complained that Kurdish militant demonstrations had been allowed on the streets of Stockholm.
Swedish Foreign Minister Tobias Billstrom said afterwards it was "a development we did not want, but were prepared for". It was still a matter of when, not if, Sweden joined Nato, he added.
Finland and Sweden abandoned their traditional military neutrality in response to Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Almost overnight, support for Nato membership leapt from an underwhelming one-third of Finns to almost 80%.
Both countries still aim to be part of Nato in time for a July summit in Lithuania. But any new member has to secure the approval of all 30 Nato members.
Turkey is facing presidential and parliamentary elections on 14 May. Assuming the parliament ratifies Finland's accession beforehand, the government in Helsinki still has to secure the support of Hungary.
However, Hungary's ruling Fidesz party said on Friday that a vote would take place in parliament in Budapest on 27 March and that it would vote yes. A leading party figure said a decision on Sweden would take place "later".
I have friends from all balkan countries and they all love each other and would rather eat dirt than repeat the stupidity of war 😃
As a Bosniak , it upsets me that things have calmed down to the point that my own people even befriend Serbs,yes,the aggression on Bosnia,Srebrenica ,and thousands of Bosniak women and young girls that were raped did happen a long time ago,but this does not mean all is ok and let’s drink some coffee togheter and date.Yes, many girls even Bosniak girls called me ugly when it’s not my fault and were so mean to me but I still ❤️ them and feel bad.I’m here to make sure the injustice against Bosnian Muslims is not forgotten.✌️,Also so many of them still support the evil ,just ,some openly ,some secretly,not always easy to spot em,but I’m one of those non-naive Bosniaks.And should THEY be tortured in hell forever and ever for all that????
Only naive Bosniaks love THEM.
@@haristhebosniaklion8584 yeah, honestly i dont trust anyone who was old enough to live through the war, young people my age are fine but anyone whos like 40+ theyre impossible to trust
What are Balkan people called?
The South Slavs are also called Balkan Slavs. Another name popular in the early modern period was Illyrians, using the name of a pre-Slavic Balkan people, a name first adopted by Dalmatian intellectuals in the late 15th century to refer to South Slavic lands and population
The Balkan countries have a complex history of relations. Some countries have historically had good relations, while others have had conflicts. Here is a brief overview:
Bulgaria and Romania have historically had good relations.
Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina have had conflicts in the past, but in recent years they have made efforts to improve their relations.
Croatia and Slovenia also have historically good relations.
Greece and Turkey have had a long-standing dispute over the island of Cyprus, but they also have diplomatic relations and cooperate in some areas.
Greece and the Republic of Macedonia (now North Macedonia) had a dispute over the name "Macedonia" for many years, but in 2019, they reached an agreement to resolve the issue.
It is important to note that these are generalizations and the relationships between these countries are complex. Additionally, the situation can change over time, so it's always best to consult a current source for the most up-to-date information.
The sentence at the Trials of the Juntas stated the following: "The subversives had not taken control of any part of the national territory; they had not obtained recognition of interior or anterior belligerency, they were not massively supported by any foreign power, and they lacked the population's support".[36] However, the supposed threat was used for the coup.[citation needed]
In 1975, President Isabel Perón, under pressure from the military establishment, appointed Jorge Rafael Videla commander-in-chief of the Argentine Army. "As many people as necessary must die in Argentina so that the country will again be secure",[63] declared Videla in 1975 in support of the death squads. He was one of the military heads of the coup that overthrew Isabel Perón on 24 March 1976. In her place, a military junta, headed by General Jorge Rafael Videla, Admiral Emilio Eduardo Massera and General Orlando Agosti and was installed.[64]
The junta, which dubbed itself National Reorganization Process, systematized the repression, in particular through the way of "forced disappearances" (desaparecidos), which made it very difficult as was the case in Augusto Pinochet's Chile to file legal suits as the bodies were never found. This generalization of state terror tactics has been explained in part by the information received by the Argentine military in the infamous School of Americas and also by French instructors from the secret services, who taught them "counter-insurgency" tactics first experimented during the Algerian War (1954-1962).[43][65]
By 1976, Operation Condor was at its height. Chilean exiles in Argentina were threatened again and had to seek refuge in a third country. Chilean General Carlos Prats had already been assassinated by the Chilean DINA in Buenos Aires in 1974, with the help of former DINA agents Michael Townley and Enrique Arancibia. Cuban diplomats were also assassinated in Buenos Aires in the infamous Automotores Orletti torture center, one of the 300 clandestine prisons of the dictatorship, managed by the Grupo de Tareas 18, headed by Aníbal Gordon, previously convicted for armed robbery and who answered directly to the General Commandant of the SIDE, Otto Paladino. Automotores Orletti was the main base of foreign intelligence services involved in Operation Condor. One of its survivors, José Luis Bertazzo, who was detained for two months there, identified Chileans, Uruguayans, Paraguayans and Bolivians among the prisoners. These captives were interrogated by agents from their own countries.[66]
According to John Dinges's Los años del Cóndor, Chilean MIR prisoners in Orletti center told José Luis Bertazzo that they had seen two Cuban diplomats, Jesús Cejas Arias and Crescencio Galañega, tortured by Gordon's group and interrogated by a man who came from Miami to interrogate them. The two Cuban diplomats, charged with the protection of the Cuban ambassador to Argentina Emilio Aragonés, had been kidnapped on 9 August 1976 by 40 armed SIDE agents who blocked off all sides of the street with their Ford Falcons, the cars used by the security forces during the dictatorship.[67] According to John Dinges, the FBI as well as the CIA were informed of their abduction. In his book, Dinges published a cable sent by Robert Scherrer, an FBI agent in Buenos Aires on 22 September 1976, where he mentions in passing that Michael Townley, later convicted of the assassination on 21 September 1976 of former Chilean minister Orlando Letelier in Washington, D.C., had also taken part to the interrogation of the two Cubans. The former head of the DINA confirmed to Argentine federal judge María Servini de Cubría on 22 December 1999, in Santiago de Chile, the presence of Townley and Cuban Guillermo Novo Sampoll in the Orletti center. The two men traveled from Chile to Argentina on 11 August 1976 and "cooperated in the torture and assassination of the two Cuban diplomats".[66] According to the "terror archives" discovered in Paraguay in 1992, 50,000 persons were murdered in the frame of Condor, 9,000-30,000 disappeared (desaparecidos) and 400,000 incarcerated.[68][69]
.
😃 Grinning Face with Big Eyes
One of the problems in Bosnia and Herzegovina is that the Bosnian Serbs see how the more numerous Bosniak muslims have politically sidelined the Bosnian Croats in the "Bosnian Federation" by outvoting them at every opportunity and installing political "stooges" or "puppets". The Bosnian Serbs do not want to have that happen to them and this yet another source of friction.
If the "Bosnian Federation" does not work, how can Bosnia and Herzegovina move forward?
Should be: and this is yet another source of friction.
but there is also undeniable friction between bosniaks and croats,though far less than with the serbs
@@Timo0469 Actually in the year 2021 and 2022 the friction between Croats and Bosniaks was higher than Bosniaks and Serbs.
That's because the Croats are now pushing for a de facto Croatian only entity in Bosnia.
@@ceroid3752 i have croatian family in hercegovina, i know about the issues
@@ceroid3752 and we will push them back to croatia this time if they try anything
What a scummy series to create... future wars... like its entertainment to speculate about potential conflicts around the world
exactly , we messed up in Ukraine , now please avert Your eyes here is something that we can handle ...
War’ is almost unanimously understood as the use of violence by the state to attain certain political objectives.[1] There are, however, some qualifications to this seemingly straightforward definition. The image of conventional war is a mental and theoretical juxtaposition of two unrelated sets of historic events: Westphalian pre-nation-state war between kingdoms, and the globe-spanning First and Second World Wars. These have mingled with each other to create a static image of ‘war’-a catastrophic act that is violent beyond imagination. While the destructiveness of the First and Second World Wars today serves as a mental model of how wars are generally fought, they have also been used to define and lay down rules by international bodies on what constitutes war and aggression. Thus, norms of territoriality still define and trigger alarms for a hypothetical attack on one nation-state by another.[2]
In theory, war is never imagined to be protracted or interminable, even when instigated by the most expansionist of powers, and every war contains within it the seeds of its own termination. It is in the interaction of opposing forces, the seemingly achievable nature of military objectives, and the societal passion that it invokes, that war may go on beyond what both sides calculated or imagined it to be.[3] Indeed, total war, which leads to the decimation of the opposer’s society, culture, population and way of living, is the only war that can be defined as finished.[4] Every other outcome is merely a “strategic pause” before the next round. In contemporary times, when total war is neither imaginable nor possible, everyone is condemned to live in a society where competition is the norm. Such competition takes the form of hybrid warfare, proxy war-actions below the hypothetical “redlines” of territorial aggression by a country’s armed forces.[5] The nature of this ‘competition’-straddling the extreme ends of war and peace-is slowly yet steadily changing the way militaries are being utilised, and will be utilised in the future.
It's Just a PlayStation don't get addicted to it's not warning threat
Forget Bosnia, we British are standing by to retake our country.
We here broooooo get used to it 😀
Plaid Cymru!
Forget British
British armed forces have served in former Yugoslavia in support of United Nations missions since 1992. Their task has been difficult and sometimes dangerous. Eighteen British soldiers have lost their lives, and 41 others have been seriously injured in the course of duty. They have helped to save many thousands of lives. We are rightly proud of them, as they can be proud of themselves.
Since the summer, conditions in Bosnia have changed completely. At the London conference in July, the international community declared itself ready to take military action against the Bosnian Serbs. Britain took the lead with France in creating a reaction force, and was involved in the NATO action that followed. Since then, the international community has worked long and hard to support the American-led peace effort. At last, a settlement has been achieved.
The peace implementation conference, organised last week by the British Government, made substantial progress with planning the civilian aspects of the peace agreement. Carl Bildt was appointed to oversee its implementation, guided by a small steering board, which includes the G8 nations and the Organisation of the Islamic Conference.
We expect the peace agreement to be signed in Paris on 14 December. At that point, the military task will be transformed. Within a few days, NATO will take over full military responsibility from the United Nations and deploy forces to implement the agreement. Our mission is to oversee the separation of the warring factions and the return to barracks of their soldiers, and to provide the security necessary for Bosnia and Herzegovina to establish national institutions and hold free elections.
NATO's mission is rightly limited in scope. It is also limited in duration-to 12 months.
For the first time, we have a comprehensive peace agreement. Its implementation requires international forces that are capable of deterring any breakdown in the peace. Only a NATO-led force can fulfil that mission. It will be NATO's first ever land operation. The plan involves some 60,000 troops, of which over 13,000 will be from Britain. We will supply a brigade, and a divisional headquarters to command one of the three military sectors.
In addition, Britain has the leading role in commanding NATO's Rapid Reaction Corps, a British-led, multinational NATO force. We will provide most of the field headquarters controlling the whole operation, including its commanding officer, General Sir Michael Walker.
Britain's contribution is formidable. It expresses our willingness to fulfil our obligations as a key member of NATO and our international role as a member of the permanent five of the Security Council of the United Nations. It also indicates, in the clearest manner, the strength of our commitment to the security of Europe. Such responsibilities carry a cost which we are prepared to bear.
It is my duty to be sure that our forces are able to carry out their purpose and to protect themselves. Of course, they will use persuasion to implement the peace, and in Toggle showing location ofColumn 836the British Army even the most junior ranks have experience of making highly sensitive judgements on the spot; but when they need to take robust action, they will be equipped and authorised to do so. We shall be sending Challenger tanks,AS90 heavy artillery and armed helicopters. Our force will include the full panoply of signallers, engineers, medical teams, and logistic troops. They will have with them 7,500 vehicles and 7,000 tonnes of ammunition.
To move those forces rapidly to Bosnia involves a complex operation by sea and air, including, for example, 250 RAF transport flights. Military planners and civil servants have worked long hours to prepare a plan to deliver our forces and their equipment safely and on time.
We have done everything possible to minimise the risks to our people, yet there will be dangers. It will be important to them to know through this House that they have the undivided support of the nation. Once more, Britain's armed forces are deploying far from home, not to conquer, not to make war, but in the service of peace, this time as part of a NATO-led force. The Government know that they will carry out their responsibilities with great distinction.
I hope that the House will take this opportunity to express its support for the men and women of the Royal Navy, the Army and the Royal Air Force, and the reservists and civilians who accompany them. We wish them all success in their mission and, when the task is done, a safe return to their families.
Dr. David Clark
(South Shields)
So this shows Bosnia is not included lots injured soldiers Bosnia why is it so ?
Fascism has three core components: "(i) the rebirth myth, (ii) populist ultra-nationalism, and (iii) the myth of decadence. Ignoring early signs of nazism is not going to make it disappear, it will just escalate at a later point. BiH can't be prosperous country as long as our leaders negate country for which they work, and can't be prosperous as long as we are giving a middle finger to all other nationalities except these three. Just gives as a political system as in any other normal European country and BiH will rise, but that goes against nationalistic ideologies so it will hardly happen. It is not Europe's fault that it is getting educated people from our country for free, it is a fault of wrong ideology supporters that made them leave. And Bosnia and Herzegovina is a 6th country in the world by declination of population. Serbia is above BiH by declination, who threatens Serbian people in Serbia? Croatia is just below BiH in declination, who threatens Croatian people in Croatia? Being endangered in BiH just because of a nationality is just a stupid talk.
just leave them to it
Woman don't fight in wars men do woman don't have that capability so please keep your comments to yourself
To allow someone to do something without one's involvement or interference; to withdraw from someone so they can do or finish something alone.
06:37 ukranian flag
Dolazili u bosnu da ubijaju bosnjake evo kako ih je bog kaznio sad je rat u njihovoj drzavi
@@Hasanovicc18 da
very objective documenary, serb propaganda is similar like russian propaganda. Only lies
The solution it's partition!
The only solution is expulsion of the 5th collumn and everyone who doesn't want to be part of the country.
@@nosmokejazwinski6297
The country does not belong to muslims, in fact they are a minority.
The best solution for Bosnia is for the country to be split in two, where everyone goes their separate ways. The country is already divided into two separate entities that differ in a political, ethnic, and religious sense. Republika Srpska should go independent or join Serbia and that would give the Federation full control over it's future. This is quite a simple and easy fix but the West (US, Germany, UK and France) refuses to allow it because they want the country to be a bureaucratic nightmare and hotspot for their own corruption.
"The best solution for Bosnia is for the country to be split in two..."
It would have to split into 3 parts if the country fell apart. As the Bosnian Croats especially those in Western Herzegovina would not want to live in an Islamic Bosnian statelet.
Unfortunately, in case of a total split without an agreement then there would be conflict of some kind.
Also, what would happen to the Brcko district which is a separate area to Rep. Srpska & the Federation?
Things could get messy quickly.
this will never happen buddy bosnians will never allow bosnia to split again
@@AmarAlgadi Bosnia & Herzegovina isn`t going to split up right now as NATO is against it but there will have to be political reforms or the country will remain unstable & a failed state for the foreseeable future.
@@universalconquest4447 "Brcko District is part of Repulika Srpska as per Dayton Agreement."
No, its not, Brcko is a separate district. So that would be a source of conflict.
@@universalconquest4447 Its marked as a separate district on the internal maps of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
The Brcko district also includes territory taken from both the Rep.Srpska & the Federation. So, like I said it would be a likely source of conflict in case Bosnia falls apart without an agreement.
I guess England will be next!
We will beg France to save us
NATO's "open door policy" is based on Article 10 of its founding treaty. Any decision to invite a country to join the Alliance is taken by the North Atlantic Council on the basis of consensus among all Allies. No third country has a say in such deliberations. how it's possible before this. it's changed Yugoslavia name changed into Serbia so Yugoslavia must be there r
Serbia must there what happened is u bought Serbia through money so it's illegal
often they r hacking our do something to stop this
Herceg bosna
Veliku Srbiju mogu jedino na nebu praviti.
I don't even need to watch the whole video to understand that this is a video against the Serbs and not a video that talks about another war in bosnia because it would be useless to talk about it since bosnia is more peaceful than ever after the death of alija izetbegovic
Bosnia is more peaceful yet the Serbs in Bosnia are still worshiping war criminals? Explain that one genius.
Alija Izetbegović (Bosnian pronunciation: [ǎlija ǐzedbeɡoʋitɕ]; 8 August 1925 - 19 October 2003) was a Bosnian politician, lawyer, Islamic philosopher and author, who in 1992 became the first president of the Presidency of the newly independent Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Shortly after his term began, the country's Serb community revolted and created the separatist Republika Srpska (with support from Serbia), leading to the Bosnian War. Izetbegović led the Bosniak forces initially alongside Croat forces, until a separate war erupted between them. Relations between the two sides were resolved in the Washington Agreement, which he signed with Croatian president Franjo Tuđman.
The war in Bosnia continued, with widespread ethnic cleansing and other war crimes committed by all sides, eventually culminating in the massacre of male Bosniaks in Srebrenica by Serb forces, which would later be determined to be genocide. He was also a signatory for the Dayton Accords, which ended the war in a stalemate following NATO bombings, and recognized Republika Srpska as an autonomous entity within Bosnia. Izetbegovic continued to serve in this role until 1996, when he became a member of the Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina, serving until 2000.
Izetbegović was the founder and first president of the Party of Democratic Action. He was also the author of several books, most notably Islam Between East and West and the Islamic Declaration.
"Future Wars: Will there be another Bosnian war?"
Not for now as NATO would come down hard on anyone who started it.
It should be pointed out the Bosnian muslims ( or Bosniak muslims) have made threats in the recent past mainly towards the less numerous Bosnian Croats. The Bosnian muslims have an aim to create an Islamic statelet in Bosnia and Herzegovina probably based on the Turkish state so not E.U compatible.
A lil less bullshiting kolega.. if the constitution of Bosnia in war time was 1 country, 3 peoples why would anyone want to implement islamic laws? U´re well aware that half of Bosniaks dont even practise islam and just say im muslim. These same accusations were used in the 90s to try and rationalize the genocide of muslims in Bosnia to the christian Europe. u are aware that muslims in Bosnia arent the first line of attack on christianity but the first line of defence whenever the christians attack so this nonsense talk about dzamaharija,sultanat,khalifat are bs
@@dzenanbrkic9606 There is a lot of Saudi and Turkish influence in Bosnia. A number of European countries have noticed it and their T.Vs have made TV reports about it some are on YT.
Ethnic cleansing is a purposeful policy of "rendering an area ethnically homogeneous by using force or intimidation to remove from a given area persons from another ethnic group".[43]
A report by the UN Commission of Experts dated 27 May 1994 defined ethnic cleansing as an act of "rendering an area ethnically homogenous by using force or intimidation to remove persons of given groups from the area", and found that ethnic cleansing has been carried out through "murder, torture, arbitrary arrest and detention, extra-judicial executions, rape and sexual assaults, confinement of civilian populations in ghetto areas, forcible removal, displacement and deportation of civilian populations, deliberate military attacks or threats of attacks on civilians and civilian areas, and wanton destruction of property".[44] Such forms of persecution of a group were defined as crimes against humanity and they can also fall within the meaning of the Genocide Convention.[45]
The terms "ethnic cleansing" and "genocide" are not synonymous but academic discourse considers both to exist within a spectrum of assaults on nations or religio-ethnic groups. Ethnic cleansing is similar to the forced deportation or population transfer of a group to change the ethnic composition of a territory whereas genocide is aimed at the destruction of a group.[46] To draw a distinction between the terms, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) delivered a verdict in the Bosnian Genocide Case:
It [i.e. ethnic cleansing] can only be a form of genocide within the meaning of the [Genocide] Convention, if it corresponds to or falls within one of the categories of acts prohibited by Article II of the Convention. Neither the intent, as a matter of policy, to render an area "ethnically homogeneous", nor the operations that may be carried out to implement such policy, can as such be designated as genocide: the intent that characterizes genocide is "to destroy, in whole or in part" a particular group, and deportation or displacement of the members of a group, even if effected by force, is not necessarily equivalent to destruction of that group, nor is such destruction an automatic consequence of the displacement. This is not to say that acts described as 'ethnic cleansing' may never constitute genocide, if they are such as to be characterized as, for example, 'deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part', contrary to Article II, paragraph (c), of the Convention, provided such action is carried out with the necessary specific intent (dolus specialis), that is to say with a view to the destruction of the group, as distinct from its removal from the region. - ICJ.[47]
Unfortunately it’s all too true, Russian aspirations look towards the rise of the ‘soviet empire’ hence Putin is too busy to attend Gorbachov’s funeral as many Russians blame Gorbachev for the fall of the Soviet empire.
Russia is already eyeing up Moldavia and the Balkan states so do not be surprised if Russia helps to ferment unrest in Europe, it’s what the fascist right do best.
Bollocks....
Its only a feeling but if the russo-ukriainian war will go into a stalemate, I fear what the reporter is saying will come through. Russias 2nd wave of attack is to cause instability so to create distraction which would make Bosnias unrest the best target. Next would be start various terror attacks or cyber attacks around Europe.
All this ridiculous stupid western propagation of scaremongering, this country is next by Russia, this country is then next by Russia. All bollocks talk, as Russia can only barely manage their own affairs. Their army, although formidable, isn't a patch on on the Soviet Red Army. Hence, if the USSR kept their union together through democratic socialism, there'd be no break up of the Soviet Union, then there woukd be no break up of Yugoslavia, both of them huge mistakes.
It was nationalism that caused all of this by the drunkard western stooge, Yeltsin and then the dangerous Milosevic in the former Yugoslavia.
I agree, the far right are dangerous.
Poor Gorbachev RIP, he was great, tried to keep the union together, but sneakly taken away from him by the drunkard Yeltsin meeting the leaders in secret on December 8th 1991 in a forest with the leaders of Belarus and the Ukraine at the time. They never told Gorbachev, still the leader of the USSR what they'd done, dismantling the USSR.
Just putin blames Gorbachov for the fall of the Sovjet union. I do wish for people who want to be russian to move to russia and not to start a war.
So the fact that the Bosnian Serbs do not want to be part of BHG is the Russians fault then. If I remember rightly NATO boombed Serbia ( including killing journalist by bombing a news outlet. That is against international law ). Their was no UN solution. They bombed a sovereign country. I'm not cheer leading for any side I'm just pointing out everyone has blood on their hands.
This is biased ! So much!! However, just explain WHY is so wrong that Serbs want to go independent. Why??
Serbs are independent what is serbia. If Serbs hate bosnia they can go to serbia.
Serbia can take land from Bosnia if they give us some of their land too
"That is number one, I will talk about it with Macron and Scholz. The second issue is how to avoid provocations in the future. And number three is the formation of the CSM, which was agreed upon 10 years ago, but has not been implemented. It is very simple, and I think that we all agree on that. People now have a real picture of what is happening in the Balkans, regardless of who recognized and who did not recognize Kosovo and Metohija. We were always labeled as the culprits, but I think now everyone sees that things are not that simple," he said.
Vučić points out that he does not want to talk about time frames, because it is necessary to find a long-term solution.
"We don't need good wishes, but for people in the Balkans to understand that compromise is not a bad word. Everyone is radicalized, even in your countries. We must find compromise solutions," said the president.
He says that the countries of the Western Balkans have asked for more energy aid, but he is not sure that it will happen.
"We have money and reserves, citizens do not need to worry. If things remain like this, we will not need a new electricity price increase, which was agreed with the IMF. We will not allow that we create an opportunity for others to attract investors due to lower energy prices This is what gives Serbia an advantage over all others in the Balkans," President Vučić concluded his address.
Respect for angela merkel!!!!
it Started 1992 wait
Just msg there two which done first b'coz i'm doing
No, taiwan first, then bosnia
Mohammed brother Selam aleikum
it Started 1992 catastrophic handle it
I respect Serbia's fight against Islamic terrorism and fundamentalism and against NATO in the 90s.
Please do explain
@@jagheteromer Explain what
Croatia fight against islamic terrorism not servia
@@kategoried7501 They both did.
@@GW_01 serbia was ottoman vassal in 16. century
It is not war one is without arm and one have army
This is a list of countries without armed forces. The term country here means sovereign states and not dependencies (e.g., Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, Bermuda) whose defense is the responsibility of another country or an army alternative. The term armed forces refers to any government-sponsored defense used to further the domestic and foreign policies of their respective government. Some of the countries listed, such as Iceland and Monaco, have no standing armies but still have a non-police military force.[1][2][3]
Many of the 21 countries listed here typically have had a long-standing agreement with a former colonial or protecting power; one example of the latter is the agreement between Monaco and France, which has existed for at least 300 years.[4][5] Similarly, the Compact of Free Association nations of the Marshall Islands, Federated States of Micronesia (FSM), and Palau rely on the United States for their defense. They ensure their national security concerns are addressed through annual Joint Committee Meetings to discuss defense matters with US Pacific Command. Andorra has a small army, and can request defensive aid if necessary,[6][7] while Iceland has a unique agreement from 1951 with the United States which requires them to provide defense to Iceland when needed, although permanent armed forces have not been stationed there since 2006.[8][9]
The remaining countries are responsible for their own defense, and operate either without any armed forces, or with limited armed forces. Some of the countries, such as Costa Rica and Grenada, underwent a process of demilitarization.[10][11][12] Other countries were formed without armed forces, such as Samoa over 60 years ago;[13] the primary reason being that they were, or still are, under protection from another nation at their point of indeed..
"European unity". Never forget 1999
u bosnia lots war there is no peace they only democracy
Let me finissh first sir
So much for "diversity is strength" eh?
Ethnic cleansing happened somewhere 30 years ago and now we're all meant to be racist. Yeah, no...
This is historical conflict, not some EDL "They took our jobs".
The conflict was about territorial hegemony and imperialism, not about diversity.
I Wrote the truth they hacked now
Just keep portraying Serbs as bad guys... i'm sure thats gonna help.
The Serbs shooting 8,000 boys and men at Srebrenica didn`t help their image. There is a very long list of Serbian war crimes.
Everyone who does that is simply pointing out facts.
@@tarik6990 Yeah because Muslims in Bosnia are freaking little angels. Get real! 🥴
@@natasa8266 They are for the most part, certainly compared to the average Serb.
@@tarik6990 Hahahha....and then people wonder why there are separatistic ideas in the country. Those bad serbs and Croats desperately trying to split from innocent Muslims 🥴
There will never be love there
The word Balkan is Turkish and means “mountain,” and the peninsula is certainly dominated by this type of landform, especially in the west. The Balkan Mountains lie east-west across Bulgaria, the Rhodope Mountains extend along the Greek-Bulgarian border, and the Dinaric range extends down the Adriatic coast to Albania. By some definitions the region’s northern boundary extends to the Julian Alps and the Carpathians. Among these ranges extensive areas of good arable land are relatively scarce, though the valleys of the Danube, Sava, and Vardar rivers, eastern Bulgaria, parts of the Aegean Sea coast, and especially the Danubian Plain are exceptions. The mountains have a significant impact on the climate of the peninsula. The northern and central parts of the Balkans have a central European climate, characterized by cold winters, warm summers, and well-distributed rainfall. The southern and coastal areas, however, have a Mediterranean type of climate, with hot, dry summers and mild, relatively rainy winters.
Peace & Love can u stay in Romania & join NATO
As a Bosniak , it upsets me that things have calmed down to the point that my own people even befriend Serbs,yes,the aggression on Bosnia,Srebrenica ,and thousands of Bosniak women and young girls that were raped did happen a long time ago,but this does not mean all is ok and let’s drink some coffee togheter and date.Yes, many girls even Bosniak girls called me ugly when it’s not my fault and were so mean to me but I still ❤️ them and feel bad.I’m here to make sure the injustice against Bosnian Muslims is not forgotten.✌️,Also so many of them still support the evil ,just ,some openly ,some secretly,not always easy to spot em,but I’m one of those non-naive Bosniaks.And should THEY be tortured in hell forever and ever for all that????
There will never be peace in the balkans.
Why can peopel not see what The Russia do in Ukraina and other contries.? After 24 februari its a dark world
America and European union created the problem
Actually the sunrise is here America and NATO NeoNazis will be out of middle East and Balkans.. peace will return to the world..
Yummy, more spicy war crimes incoming.
yummy drinks, fun drinks, party drinks. Its aloe-juice and antioxidant-enriched formula helps sooth and hydrate while delivering this should be used that's why u blocked page but this healthy but it's not come for all country that's why they blocked this page specially adulterations must be done before civilian take this so what r component mixed we will
come to know
The international community is o the side of the Muslims! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 WHERE TF HAS HE BEEN!!!!!
Nope. They are Against Russia. Nothing to do with Muslims
Bosniaks really think if Serbs and Croats weren’t in Bosnia they would be Switzerland 😂😂
Think of it like this lol the reason we left Yugoslavia is because of your guys thirst for power, and your thirst for power will yet again ruin another country pretty soon. Please tell me Stefan which ethnicity is the problem? The “Muslims”?
No, nobody thinks that. We would however have a much more stable country without ethnic divisions if 40% of the people living there weren't actively seeking to destroy the country and finish what they started 30 years ago.
@@jedendva3257 Yes the Muslims. They are the ones attempting to centralize a country that can't exist as a centralized entity. The Serbs tried the same with Yugoslavia, attempted to centralize something which had to be a federation.
No we don't? Maybe our braindead politicians do but who tf said we the people do
@@ceroid3752 not comparable. Bosnia is not a federation nor was it formed by several countries uniting into one. The catholics and orthodox who dont want to live in Bosnia can always leave, they know where the border is.
Soon US is out from Europe it will give us peace
The US was not around for much of Europes history slick! I didn't see no peace during that time!
@@doomslayer1984 if USA didn’t proceed with there’s hegemony, EX Yugoslavia could stay as neutral but it wasn’t their interest
@@stanaimamovic5055 The USA did everything to keep Yugoslavia together along with the U.K & France.
The problem was Serbian president Milosevic who ignored federal Yugoslav laws and proceeded with his "Greater Serbia" plan which ended in disaster and 130,000 dead people.
@@northernstar4811 what exactly did they do to try to keep Yugoslavia together?
@@northernstar4811 Not really.
The plan to take down Yugoslavia was long on the table.
After the fall of USSR, all former socialist states or allies would be targeted. Many are failed states now. Others are marionettes.
The attack on Serbia and the destruction of Yugoslavia was pure malice. Slobodan Milosevic gaining power was just one part of the problem.
Dont forget Kosovo!!!
Historically Bosnia was an ethnically Croatian Roman Catholic Kingdom. The invasion of Bosnia by the Ottoman Turks in 1463 AD changed all that, as it resulted in massive population shifts and religious conversions. This has resulted in the ethnic patchwork of Bosnia and Herzegovina we see today.
Some of the Croatian Lords in the past in Bosnia were:
Paul I Šubić of Bribir (Croatian: Pavao I. Šubić Bribirski, Hungarian: bribiri I. Subics Pál; c. 1245 - 1 May 1312) was Ban of Croatia between 1275 and 1312, and Lord of Bosnia from 1299.
After Paul died his son Mladen II Šubić of Bribir (Croatian: Mladen II Šubić Bribirski, Hungarian: bribiri Subics Mladen; c.1270 - c.1341) becomes Lord of all of Bosnia in 1312 AD.
I did a dna test few weeks ago and it came out as 43% balkan but only 0.8% Italian. My father's side is all from Northern Italy and I'm wondering if my ancestors fled from that region 600 years ago and eventually ended up in Italy?
@@trancemadmaz Its possible.
Dude stop lying bosnia was an independent kingdom prior to the ottmans, and prior to that a banate under hungary.
@@baklava6138 Religious fanatics who want to set up an undemocratic Islamic state in Bosnia have no place on the European continent.
@@northernstar4811 oh those are the talking points your using? Please do not use the word democracy ad it is hypocritical coming from a Bosnian croat.
Kosovo is Srbia and Bosna is also Srbia!
Lol. Bosnia is Bosnia
And autism is a mental disorder
kosovo is albania my g get a life
Vojvodina is Croatia..
@@Justice-qw7sj Vojvodina is Hungary, get yours!
No it was between Islam and Serbian Orthodox.
Why was Croatia attacked by Serbia then?
Nope.
Nope if it was that the Serbs wouldnt attack croatia then
Don't even try to act like this video isn't just anti-serb propaganda. Btw, there was no massacre in Srebrenica and the serbs didn't commit any more ''ethnic cleansing'' than the bosnians and croats did to serbs. The Dayton accords and bosnian tri-state were made to fail.
"Btw, there was no massacre in Srebrenica..."
The international Hague court ruled the Serbs committed genocide at Srebrenica.
Serbia Teroerrist criminals started first world war
"There was no massacre in srebrenica" Victims of it and a huge graveyard say otherwise
@@northernstar4811 The hague would rule Serbian breakfast to be genocide. A rogue unit/commander executing civies in a town isn't genocide. I don't get why the Croatian/Bosniak part of the conflict is never talked about. This for example: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmi%C4%87i_massacre
Would the hague consider this genocde? Or is 120 people too few? Never talked about. All of these reports are clearly biased. Just jump on the hate train though, that's gonna work out fine
Glory to Serbia
Glory to Russia ❤️🇷🇺
Živila Hrvatska
🤓
Glory to Pro-Serbia
Glory to Russia
Strahota koja je bila ,nevolim ni da se sjetim ,uzas je bio ,da Bog kazni sve koji su zlo nam uradili
Notice how he didn't metion chritans at 1:01 hmmm hiding the fact that Croatia slaughtered muslim under name of chritanity
Persecution of Christians
The persecution of Christians can be historically traced from the first century of the Christian era to the present day. Christian missionaries and converts to Christianity have both been targeted for persecution, sometimes to the point of being martyred for their faith, ever since the emergence of Christianity.
Early Christians were persecuted at the hands of both Jews, from whose religion Christianity arose, and the Romans who controlled many of the early centers of Christianity in the Roman Empire. Since the emergence of Christian states in Late Antiquity, Christians have also been persecuted by other Christians due to differences in doctrine which have been declared heretical. Early in the fourth century, the empire's official persecutions were ended by the Edict of Serdica in 311 and the practice of Christianity legalized by the Edict of Milan in 312. By the year 380, Christians had begun to persecute each other. The schisms of late antiquity and the Middle Ages - including the Rome-Constantinople schisms and the many Christological controversies - together with the later Protestant Reformation provoked severe conflicts between Christian denominations. During these conflicts, members of the various denominations frequently persecuted each other and engaged in sectarian violence. In the 20th century, Christian populations were persecuted, sometimes, they were persecuted to the point of genocide, by various states, including the Ottoman Empire and its successor state, which committed the Hamidian massacres, the Armenian genocide, the Assyrian genocide, and the Greek genocide, and atheist states such as those of the former Eastern Bloc.
The persecution of Christians has continued to occur during the 21st century. Christianity is the largest world religion and its adherents live across the globe. Approximately 10% of the world's Christians are members of minority groups which live in non-Christian-majority states.[4] The contemporary persecution of Christians includes the genocide of Christians by the Islamic State and persecution by other terrorist groups, with official state persecution mostly occurring in countries which are located in Africa and Asia because they have state religions or because their governments and societies practice religious favoritism. Such favoritism is frequently accompanied by religious discrimination and religious persecution.
According to the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom's 2020 report, Christians in Burma, China, Eritrea, India, Iran, Nigeria, North Korea, Pakistan, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and Vietnam are persecuted; these countries are labelled "countries of particular concern" by the United States Department of State, because of their governments' engagement in, or toleration of, "severe violations of religious freedom".[5]: 2 The same report recommends that Afghanistan, Algeria, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, the Central African Republic, Cuba, Egypt, Indonesia, Iraq, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Sudan, and Turkey constitute the US State Department's "special watchlist" of countries in which the government allows or engages in "severe violations of religious freedom".[5]: 2
Much of the persecution of Christians in recent times is perpetrated by non-state actors which are labelled "entities of particular concern" by the US State Department, including the Islamist groups Boko Haram in Nigeria, the Houthi movement in Yemen, the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant - Khorasan Province in Pakistan, al-Shabaab in Somalia, the Taliban in Afghanistan, the Islamic State and Tahrir al-Sham in Syria, as well as the United Wa State Army and participants in the Kachin conflict in Myanmar.[5]: 2
Is not gonna happen
Again ciann bs.
Warmongering Western insects.
The war against the potato beetle was a campaign launched in Warsaw Pact countries during the Cold War to eradicate the Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata). It was also a propaganda operation that alleged that the insect was introduced into East Germany, the People's Republic of Poland and Communist Czechoslovakia by the United States as a form of entomological warfare. Communist propaganda of the time claimed that the insect was being dropped from parachutes and balloons, with the intent of immiserating the populations of these countries, causing famines, and facilitating an economic crisis.[1]
Warmongering Starts it's lead END OF WORLD