A Discussion of Labor Law: Is the Taft-Hartley Act Being Interpreted as Written?

The 1947 Taft-Hartley amendments to the National Labor Relations Act, doggedly opposed by organized labor, included compliance with practicable portions of the federal rules of evidence and civil procedure, barring the Board from treating supervisors and independent contractors as protected employees, expressly incorporating employer free-speech rights, and more. Where are the Taft-Hartley amendments today and why?
Featuring:
Fred B. Jacob, Solicitor, National Labor Relations Board
Hon. John F. Ring, Partner, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, former Chairman of the National Labor Relations Board
* * * * *
As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker.

[@rickferyok2462]

I wouldn't expect the presentation to be even handed: 3:48 "misconduct by unions" Well why don't you use Misconducts by businesses necessitated the Wagner Act - associate businesses with misconduct!

[@rickferyok2462]

You see Ring - it comes down to power. Justice is impossible to achieve without a balance of power. Taft Hartley is about undermining the power of organized labor. And you are anti-labor, as evidenced by your condescending statement use of the word "misconduct."