At first glance I thought oh just another possessed doll movie.However I think the ending with him living in the walls was pretty clever and I didn’t predict it! The 2nd one should have focused on like maybe next victim? Or a origin story? Hell even flashbacks from Brahms perspective?! Literally ANYTHING else 😂
How did Alien 3 not make this list? Killing off 3 of the main surviving characters of Aliens off screen at the beginning of the 1st act definitely pissed people off. Especially after waiting 7 years for a bloody sequel.
@@Hideyoriisdaman Not sure about the acting but Finchers darker touch definitely added something needed in the franchise. Too bad he had no control over the horrible script.
@@HideyoriisdamanYeah, maybe... but you won't conclude that until the movie is well underway. The title is pissed off right away: And right away Alien 3 pissed me off it did 😂
Alien 3 for me. After everything that happened in Aliens and everything they went through to survive, even Ripley winning a fight against the queen, to just kill off Hicks and Newt in the opening sequence in what was effectively an offscreen kill was horribly disheartening. To later go on to Bishop being irreparable and Ripley dying to the one thing she feared most also put a bad taste in my mouth. Made me feel like the entirety of Aliens was for nothing. I get that a lot of people like the more dismal tone and the tragic aspect of the whole thing, but it just felt really unsatisfying to me.
I don’t like Aliens 3. Granted I like it better than 4, but that’s not saying much. I was furious we lost Newt and Hicks. Maybe I could understand losing one of them ( I gather the girl didn’t want to do more acting) but you can’t tell me both were “Nah I’m good.” But if you read the wiki page for the movie it looks like they never thought of Biehn at all after a script written by Brandywyne Productions ( people who started the film series) wanting Hicks to be the main protagonist for #3 and him and Ripley taking down Weyland-Yutani on a two part film. It looks fascinating. It just fell apart with Fox studios getting too involved and other bs. But why they killed off Hicks and Newt is not discussed.
It was meant to be so different - on a wooden planet of monks But also, if you want the entire lore of aliens to not be destroyed for you, avoid Prometheus and definitely covenant!!
What I have noticed about the Resident Evil film series is that each movie gives you something to look forward to in the sequel and then punishes you for it in the next film. Almost like the director is mocking you for liking any aspect of the film.
Outrageous, for what. The movie was called The (REVENGE) of Michael Myers. He got his revenge. What part of revenge don't you understand 😂
Před 9 měsíci+57
0:42 - Jason Goes to Hell: The Final Friday 1:48 - Book of Shadows: Blair Witch II 2:39 - Scream 3 3:52 - A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010) 5:06 - Saw III 6:21 - 28 Weeks Later 7:35 - The Fly II 8:38 - Resident Evil: Afterlife 9:46 - Halloween: Resurrection 10:54 - Brahms: The Boy II
@ASirensFlamefor me between the 2 is was a waste of 5+ hours i wont get back. the movie was decent at best. just like hereditary i fail to see any of the praise to be worthy.
The scene where they kill Jason is actually a pretty cool scene. In my opinion, it's just that the rest of the movie suffers afterwards. They should have definitely used that as like a finale scene.
Yeah, it's an awesome scene and one Halloween fans always wanted to see. Like you said, it just happens in the wrong spot of the movie. If the movie ended with it, it would have been awesome!
How is Alien3 not number 1 on this list? With the deaths of Hicks and Newt in the first few minutes of the film certainly qualifies as pissing off audiences big time and has severely hurt the franchise so bad that it never recovered.
I was highly disappointed by "Smile" not only has just one big scary scene, but the escene is at the very begining and even worse they showed it in the trailer :/ so basically they ruined the only scary scene even before of watching the movie.
As far as reversing the original film goes, the Bogeyman franchise takes the cake. The original is about a supernatural Entity, but the second claims that it never existed and the original protagonist was actually insane and the killer for part 2 is a copycat. But then came part three that not only brought back the supernatural Bogeyman but also blamed him for the events of part 2!
The worst offender is Resident Evil. Alice gets her powers and then suddenly loses them and we don't see her gaining them back. And all become green screen and CGI. Bollocks.
yep. number one was the one that pissed me off the most. I LOVED The Boy first movie and when i saw the second one i was SO angry i legit walked out. I almost even yelled 'you CAN'T IGNORE THE FIRST MOVIE'
SAW 3 has one more problem with the opening, saw fans don't like when Jigsaw cheats. Because it makes everything feel more cheap, it destroys the interest in the film cotraptions because if everything is rigged, then all became meaningless.
I genuinely loved The Boy bcuz of that awesome twist, but I was nervous when I heard there was a sequel. I’m glad my friend saw it first and she immediately told me not to bother bcuz they ruined it by throwing “another twist” that the doll actually was haunted. I’m glad I didn’t watch it
Dishonorable mentions: Making it a prequel. Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning. Bad CGI overload: The Final Destination. The never ending opening: Scream 4. The deaths of Newt and Hicks. Alien 3. The timeline reset: Texas Chainsaw (2022)
For Resident Evil: Afterlife, maybe they could have let at least one clone remain with Alice. Would have been interesting to see them like sisters, could have spent part of the movie wondering “who’s the real Alice?”
I like to think that Cotton possibly survived his injuries and then faked his death. Leaving the door open, for him to return... possibly as a new Killer.
Sorry, but since when was Cotton Weary a fan favourite character? I’ve heard a lot of criticisms of Scream 3, but ‘conventional’ isn’t one of them. This channel was once great.
I wouldn't say "fan favorite" but Cotton is definitely a really good character, especially after being proven innocent and having all of that negative light no longer being the only view of him. But I also like them killing him at the beginning, as it goes back to the OG's idea of "Oh you know who this is, huh? Good choice for a main character? Well that's too bad."
@@TalentCaldwell At least with Fant4stic that one is pronounced with the 4 since it's not the only F4 movie and it also doesn't deserve the respect of being called fantastic
I liked how that F13 went. Kept me asking "ok, how's he gonna...?" The Detective Carrie death was the clue that told me the real Jigsaw's not behind some of the these, pissed me off cuz he had a purpose to his traps. The one with Detective Carrie did not and were therefore pointless. > Narrator tries to pronounce "Jovovich's" correctly in two ways, fails both (the J in her last name is pronounced like a Y). The ending of H20 was dumb. If it was really wasn't Michael, the guy still had a free arm and could have taken the mask off. That part was a cheap cop out.
The opening of 28 weeks later didn’t piss me off. I was surprised that a character did what he had to do. There is no way he’s fighting off zombies to save his wife. He has kids to think about.
Yeah i was so sad when detective carrie was killed.. even after completing the challenge it's so unfair.. i thought she was gonna be main protagonist or live for another sequel
Funny thing about Book of Shadows, if it was similar to the original everyone would have complained about that. Hello, Blair Witch 2016 anyone? Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
Agreed. I think Book of Shadows is a very underrated movie, and I will die on that hill. Just making another FF movie would have been so boring, BoS takes a really interesting, meta look at the hype generated by the original film. Of course, the execution is more than a little wobbly, none of the characters are terribly interesting, and the time travel plot device thingy is woefully underutilised, but considering how much hate it gets it's actually surprisingly ok, with a lot of great late nineties camp value. The 2016 version, on the other hand, not so much. And let's face it, with a movie with a premise as thin as BWP, it was pretty unlikely we were ever going to get a truly great sequel...
@@oliviav.3565 yeah, I'm also surprised it never found its cult following, it seems like the exact kind of movie that would be appreciated more on its own terms as time went on, once the hype around the original movie died
I have to disagree with 288 weeks later. I think that was the most human reaction someone could have in an impossible situation. I'm so kind and empathetic that I doubt I'd have the courage to do what Don did, I would have probably just stayed and died myself in the desperate hope to save everyone.
@@jeremybeckett6 Sorry for the typo, I have early onset Parkinsons, so sometimes I hit the sake key twice. As bad as it is, I'm 32 years old now, I probably won't live to see 45.
@@flithbrin I'm sorry to hear that. I was just ribbing you anyway friend. Just a lighthearted bit of taking the piss my guy. I hope you are living your best life for now anyway 👍
Cotton Weary? You mean that guy who wasnt in the 1st movie and barely in the 2nd was a "beloved" character? Personally, I wasn't shocked or upset at all when he died. He had cannon fodder written all over him. Alien 3 on the other hand...
I've never understood the love for Cotton in the Scream franchise. He was a moral-less bastard who literally put his fame above people's lives, even Sidney's.
Right? I mean, in Scream 2, he literally blackmailed Sidney into doing a TV interview with him -- all but threatening to let Mrs Loomis kill her if not.@@Dondingo4
The opening for 28 Weeks Later didn't piss me off, it really just made me sad; Don's in a no-win scenario, and he makes a snap decision with the situation he's thrust into and the information he has available to him. He makes the right decision, and it's only by a literal billions to one anomaly that his choice can be called into question. Given what we know about the Rage virus from the series, there was nothing else he could have done but stayed and died with everyone else.
Paxton's death in Hostel pt 2 "oh no we made our protagonist too badass and now the human traffickers don't look cool. Let's kill him and replace him with a generic Final Girl" Also yeah fuck Saw 3 for a lot of reasons but killing Kerry is the worst. Love how they gave her no focus atvall despite being there from the first movie while every male cop around her got a film dedicated to them as the protagonist (or antagonist)
I'm clearly in a minority here, based on other people's comments, but I really liked Cotton (probably because I liked Live Schreiber a lot). His moral ambiguity made him quite interesting. He wasn't a psychopath, but he wasn't a Boy Scout either. I really hated him getting killed in the beginning of Scream 3 (along with the stupidity of the new voice machine). I wouldn't necessarily have minded Cotton dying later in the film, but having him die right away was just a waste of an established character.
Well somebody is either a huge Cotton or Liev Schreiber fan... lol He's basically IMO a red herring in all the Scream movies. That was his total purpose in the franchise. Not that it's a bad thing. Personally I did not latch on to his character in any way, except that Schreiber's Intensity in the 2nd movie. But that was again just to have his character be considered in the misdirection on who the killer was. Scream 3 has my least favorite opening scene so far in the entire franchise. Yes, it was about cutting loose ends and reigniting Sydney's already revving up anxiety, but that as well as his character just falls flat for me. The actor is great. I just didn't care about Cotton much. I don't know every Horror fan. But this is news to me he's considered such a complex and interesting "favorite" character in the series.
You can't hate Don for being a coward. You CAN hate him for being a dick, coming in and kissing his wife like he didn't abandon her to die and being an IDIOT for kissing her and getting infected!
A Nightmare on Elm Street pissed me off immediately when Robert England didn’t play Freddy and the his looks looked like CGI and his voice made me laugh. Then they have the audacity to imply that Freddy was innocent of the crimes the parents accused him of. Granted they fixed it in the end with the pictures and what not. But the implication of Freddy being innocent at all pissed me off!
I suppose, at the time, Halloween: Resurrection seemed like a pointless cash grab and that they totally retconned the ending to H20.... But I think that now it's common knowledge that was never meant to be Michael at the end of H20. Heck, if I remember right, the flashback scene in Resurrection showing Michael in the paramedic uniform as the ambulance is speeding out of Hillcrest was actually filmed during H20's production....
How was #1 not Alien3, and how was Alien3 not even on this list? The opening was a slap in the face insult to everyone who loved the second movie, and the remainder of the film wasn't much better. Re: Blair Witch 2... I actually prefer it to the original. It's not that BW2 was all that great, it's that I despised the original. The characters were stupid and annoying, the plot was boring and derivative, and the found footage thing was a stupid gimmick on which the entire premise relied, and led to the rampant overuse of that gimmick in later films. Re: 28 Weeks Later... Thank you for mentioning that the infected in the movie are in fact NOT zombies.
True. Cotton Weary getting bumped off early in Scream 3 was a bad idea. The character had more potential to be kept around longer. Also, true, I being a huge fan of Dina Meyer, I agree that her being bumped off brutally in Saw 3 made me drop the franchise, it wasnt my cup of tea of horror but as I mentioned I was invested for Dina.
Honestly, I didn't think the Elm Street remake was that bad. Though I will say acting like Freddy was wrongfully killed only to predictably reveal that yeah, dude's the monster everyone thought he was was pretty stupid.
The start of 28 weeks later didn't bother me. And I truly loved the original. The movie might have been a let down in some other ways. But not the start in my opinion
I will never understand the love for Cotton in the scream films. In the first one, sure, he was wrongly accused, but in the second he was a total creepy asshole to Sydney and actually thought about killing her until he basically forced her into something she didn't want, which is a rape allegory, and it still makes him a complete dick. He also doesn't take no for an answer from Sydney several times in the film, which also fits that's disgusting allegory. In the 3rd one, he's actively flirting with someone on the phone when he think it's a female fan of his despite him having a girlfriend. While he does show that he cares about her, he also seemed like he was willing to cheat on her. He's not a good person, and is one of the biggest asshole victims in the series.
You're a sensitive soul 😂 Hannibal Lecter liked eating people, guess what, people liked him. Freddy Krueger was a pedo, guess what, people liked him. Strange you have a problem with Cotton and not Mrs Loomis who was crying out "let me kill her" she's got a knife to Sidney's throat, but your issue is with Cotton 😂
I'm surprised that Halloween III wasn't here! The fact that it wasn't about Michael Myers pissed everybody off back when it was released in the early 80s! Although I've always thought that it was a good movie!!
@@elizabethcox5911, yeah, that's what I'm saying! I think it's a great film, but I have definitely read that when it was released a lot of people were pissed that there was no Michael Myers!
really.. IT chapter 2 isn't worth a slot.. that movie's opening scene alone made my blood biol which is rare given i'm usually pretty chill during horror. another for me is the opening scene for the house of wax remake.
Me neither. It even made sense for the guy falsely accused of murdering Sidney’s mother, to be the opening kill, in the last movie of the original trilogy.
I disagree with The Fly II being on the list. Considering Gina Davis refused to return, I think they wrote the character off in a believable way. They also put in enough effort to find someone who looked a LOT like Gina Davis for the scene.
I'm sorry but Det. Carey's death in Saw III was perfect. It was meant to drive home the fact that Jigsaw's apprentice don't play by their teacher's rules. Jigsaw doesn't kill, he gives people a choice. But Amanda and Hoffman are killers, through and through
Um… Jigsaw is entirely a killer. Bombers and arsonists are still responsible for the lives they take. Wouldn’t matter if they happen to give their captives a heads up that they have about 1 minute to escape or die. Also, HE designs every trap which are designed to kill, and it’s HIS voice on every tape talking to the specific victims he chooses for the flimsiest of reasons (ex. 2 guys unknowingly dating the same girl). He even called the rack in part 3 his favorite and that guy had zero choice in if he could live. Others who were also given no choice or chance to live were the other victims of part 3, the person he made Amanda kill in her bear trap to get a key, the employees on a shotgun carousel, the wife and son of the fraud from part 7, etc. Kramer also sliced the neck of the Asian detective in part 1 before leading him into a shotgun booby trap. Charles Manson and Hitler didn’t physically kill anyone either but they (like Jigsaw) created/designed/commanded various circumstances that resulted in the deaths of many many innocents. Try watching the films again (or even a kill count CZcams video) with all of that in mind.
@@bretth342 I know the films extraordinarily well so I am aware of his ideology. However you did NOT leave the statement in quotes (“”) and instead just stated it. Try using proper punctuation if you want people to read your comments as intended. Also try re-reading your own text as it is written (without the quotes or periods you didn’t include) and recognize how normal people would read that. Don’t be a wise@ss while showcasing a deficiency.
Unpopular opinion: the Blair Witch 2 was better than the first one. Maybe it’s just because I can’t stand found footage films (they make me dizzy), or maybe because I found the original to be terribly boring. I’m not saying Book of Shadows was a masterpiece, but I enjoyed it a lot more 🤷🏻♀️
Disagreeing with What Culture after a long time. But A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010) - the opening scene was crazy good. Set the tone right away for me and my friends. The movie was not iconic as the original, obviously, but the opening scene did not deserve to be on the list.
Jason goes to hell - I quite like the FBI sting bit. The rest is awful, but I quite like that the beginning was something different. I didn't mind the first scene in Nightmare 2010. It's not great, but I didn't think it was a terrible intro.
Completely disagree with a couple of these. Book of Shadows while not great was still a good movie and the fact that it wasn't found footage is what made it good. I don't understand the hype behind Blair Witch Project. I watched that in the theater and the most entertaining part was I got to scare a group of teens sitting in front of me by scratching their chair during the climax. I found the whole movie stupid and boring. And as more movies followed the format, IMO the entire found footage style is asinine and makes things even less believable. All the stuff going on around them no one is going to keep holding onto a video camera. I feel the Nightmare on Elm Street remake get a lot of undeserved hate. They took it back to serious horror roots and eliminated the campiness of the later installments. They threw in some good homages to the original. And I don't see an issue with jumping into the horror a bit quicker in the intro. We got a quick introduction to what Freddy was capable from the jump. The character is so well known that we didn't really need a build up to get to him killing.
I agree entirely about Blair Witch. It's a terrible movie built entirely around a single gimmick (found footage) and a really well done marketing campaign, neither of which makes up for bad acting and a terrible script. I'd comment on the cinematography too, but with that gimmick there wasn't any.
Don did nothing wrong in “28 Weeks Later.” He was left with two choices to choose from in a split second: 1. Get the hell out of there and remain alive for his kids, and 2. Stick around, die, and make his kids orphans, all to fulfill a fake standard of nobility imposed by audience members, at least most of whom have probably never had to make split second life or death decisions that would either result in a bad outcome or a worse outcome.
I've seen everything on this list except for Brahms: The Boy 2 (which I purposely avoided), and I actually liked most of the other movies except Halloween: Resurrection, which was terrible, and ANOES 2010, which not only started bad, but got consistently worse throughout. Considering how legendary the original was, made on a budget of $1 million, ANOES 2010 has to be one of the worst remakes of all time and it didn't do itself any favors by making Freddy a you-know-what.
Apparently he was a ''you-know-what'' in the script for the original but it was changed due to the highly publicised cases of child interference in California around the time the original was made
@@jimmyjams86 I saw interviews with Wes Craven over this and it sounded like it was a very brief consideration, but he axed it altogether because he felt it was unnecessary. And if it had remained in the script, I don't think the franchise would have been as successful as it was, especially with Freddy becoming a pop-culture icon in the 80s.
The people who made The Boy 2 just watched the trailers for the first one before they made the sequel.
At first glance I thought oh just another possessed doll movie.However I think the ending with him living in the walls was pretty clever and I didn’t predict it! The 2nd one should have focused on like maybe next victim? Or a origin story? Hell even flashbacks from Brahms perspective?! Literally ANYTHING else 😂
That’s what makes it way better though
I was really annoyed with the second one.
How did Alien 3 not make this list?
Killing off 3 of the main surviving characters of Aliens off screen at the beginning of the 1st act definitely pissed people off. Especially after waiting 7 years for a bloody sequel.
well, acting and ambience wise the film is by far the best in the series so eh
@@Hideyoriisdaman Not sure about the acting but Finchers darker touch definitely added something needed in the franchise.
Too bad he had no control over the horrible script.
uh no lol. it's interesting for sure, but it doesn't touch the originality of Alien 1. @@Hideyoriisdaman
@@HideyoriisdamanYeah, maybe... but you won't conclude that until the movie is well underway.
The title is pissed off right away: And right away Alien 3 pissed me off it did 😂
Alien 3 for me. After everything that happened in Aliens and everything they went through to survive, even Ripley winning a fight against the queen, to just kill off Hicks and Newt in the opening sequence in what was effectively an offscreen kill was horribly disheartening. To later go on to Bishop being irreparable and Ripley dying to the one thing she feared most also put a bad taste in my mouth. Made me feel like the entirety of Aliens was for nothing. I get that a lot of people like the more dismal tone and the tragic aspect of the whole thing, but it just felt really unsatisfying to me.
I don’t like Aliens 3. Granted I like it better than 4, but that’s not saying much.
I was furious we lost Newt and Hicks.
Maybe I could understand losing one of them ( I gather the girl didn’t want to do more acting) but you can’t tell me both were “Nah I’m good.”
But if you read the wiki page for the movie it looks like they never thought of Biehn at all after a script written by Brandywyne Productions ( people who started the film series) wanting Hicks to be the main protagonist for #3 and him and Ripley taking down Weyland-Yutani on a two part film. It looks fascinating.
It just fell apart with Fox studios getting too involved and other bs.
But why they killed off Hicks and Newt is not discussed.
It was meant to be so different - on a wooden planet of monks
But also, if you want the entire lore of aliens to not be destroyed for you, avoid Prometheus and definitely covenant!!
Cardinal sin for a sequel is to invalidate the previous movie and 3 felt like it was made as an attack on anyone who liked Aliens.
Definitely agree. The beginning felt like a rip off. Forgetting it let’s the rest of the movie be alright.
There’s only 2 Alien films AFAIC. Pretty much hated everything after first two. Didn’t even bother w Covenant
What I have noticed about the Resident Evil film series is that each movie gives you something to look forward to in the sequel and then punishes you for it in the next film. Almost like the director is mocking you for liking any aspect of the film.
I'd add Rachel dying in Halloween 5 as the one of the most outrageous decisions ever made by the writers
I believe she survived. I love her TOO MUCH for her to have actually died. Besides she's hard to kill.
The whole movie is an outrage.
@@mightybitchy It shouldn't have been made.
Outrageous, for what. The movie was called The (REVENGE) of Michael Myers. He got his revenge. What part of revenge don't you understand 😂
0:42 - Jason Goes to Hell: The Final Friday
1:48 - Book of Shadows: Blair Witch II
2:39 - Scream 3
3:52 - A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010)
5:06 - Saw III
6:21 - 28 Weeks Later
7:35 - The Fly II
8:38 - Resident Evil: Afterlife
9:46 - Halloween: Resurrection
10:54 - Brahms: The Boy II
My hero ❤
looking at the title i'm honestly shocked it chapter 2 didnt make the list.
@ASirensFlamefor me between the 2 is was a waste of 5+ hours i wont get back. the movie was decent at best. just like hereditary i fail to see any of the praise to be worthy.
@@EmberMcLain87that movies was actually enjoyable.
@ASirensFlamefacts. He’s probably talking about the suicide scene and note???
The scene where they kill Jason is actually a pretty cool scene. In my opinion, it's just that the rest of the movie suffers afterwards. They should have definitely used that as like a finale scene.
yep, I was actually excited for the movie with the opening scene and then it was all downhill.
Yeah, it's an awesome scene and one Halloween fans always wanted to see. Like you said, it just happens in the wrong spot of the movie. If the movie ended with it, it would have been awesome!
@@JDeppFan2272Halloween fans? 🤔
Okay, "Halloween: The Search for More Money", that got a chuckle out of me. Well referenced!
How is Alien3 not number 1 on this list? With the deaths of Hicks and Newt in the first few minutes of the film certainly qualifies as pissing off audiences big time and has severely hurt the franchise so bad that it never recovered.
I was highly disappointed by "Smile" not only has just one big scary scene, but the escene is at the very begining and even worse they showed it in the trailer :/ so basically they ruined the only scary scene even before of watching the movie.
smile is one of the best horror movies in a very long time doesn't have to have jumpscares
As far as reversing the original film goes, the Bogeyman franchise takes the cake. The original is about a supernatural Entity, but the second claims that it never existed and the original protagonist was actually insane and the killer for part 2 is a copycat. But then came part three that not only brought back the supernatural Bogeyman but also blamed him for the events of part 2!
The worst offender is Resident Evil. Alice gets her powers and then suddenly loses them and we don't see her gaining them back. And all become green screen and CGI. Bollocks.
yep. number one was the one that pissed me off the most. I LOVED The Boy first movie and when i saw the second one i was SO angry i legit walked out. I almost even yelled 'you CAN'T IGNORE THE FIRST MOVIE'
SAW 3 has one more problem with the opening, saw fans don't like when Jigsaw cheats.
Because it makes everything feel more cheap, it destroys the interest in the film cotraptions because if everything is rigged, then all became meaningless.
I genuinely loved The Boy bcuz of that awesome twist, but I was nervous when I heard there was a sequel. I’m glad my friend saw it first and she immediately told me not to bother bcuz they ruined it by throwing “another twist” that the doll actually was haunted. I’m glad I didn’t watch it
Dishonorable mentions: Making it a prequel. Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning.
Bad CGI overload: The Final Destination.
The never ending opening: Scream 4.
The deaths of Newt and Hicks. Alien 3.
The timeline reset: Texas Chainsaw (2022)
Haha yup, ginger snap 3 was odd.
Not a film but Ive never been as frustrated than the never ending cliffhangers that the Walking Dead had the audacity to pull.
My fav episode was when the gov grew his beard and went wandering around helping people. Seen that episode?
I really appreciate you not calling the 28 weeks later infected zombies.
Finally, someone actually gets it right. Thank you!
For Resident Evil: Afterlife, maybe they could have let at least one clone remain with Alice. Would have been interesting to see them like sisters, could have spent part of the movie wondering “who’s the real Alice?”
watch the last movie .....
I like to think that Cotton possibly survived his injuries and then faked his death. Leaving the door open, for him to return... possibly as a new Killer.
Sorry, but since when was Cotton Weary a fan favourite character? I’ve heard a lot of criticisms of Scream 3, but ‘conventional’ isn’t one of them. This channel was once great.
Cotton always had fans, they're not so vocal about it like Jill wannabes and won't stfu about Stu 😂
I wouldn't say "fan favorite" but Cotton is definitely a really good character, especially after being proven innocent and having all of that negative light no longer being the only view of him. But I also like them killing him at the beginning, as it goes back to the OG's idea of "Oh you know who this is, huh? Good choice for a main character? Well that's too bad."
It's called "Halloween H-2-O, not Halloween H-20." 😂🤦♂️
Even though it takes place 20 years later, and the plot in no way revolves around water.
But it is spelled H20, not H2O, so reading as it is written she is correct. Like reading FANT4STIC, SE7EN, or M3GAN phonetically.
Wrong. The title clearly states on the DVD H20 meaning Halloween Twenty years later. Not H-2-0.
@@TalentCaldwell At least with Fant4stic that one is pronounced with the 4 since it's not the only F4 movie and it also doesn't deserve the respect of being called fantastic
Honestly I would've been okay with Blair Witch 2 not being a found footage film if it just wasn't so completely terrible in every other possible way.
How is Halloween Ends not on this list?
Jason goes to hell tag line. Then I go and spoil it all by doing something stupid like explode you
I liked how that F13 went. Kept me asking "ok, how's he gonna...?"
The Detective Carrie death was the clue that told me the real Jigsaw's not behind some of the these, pissed me off cuz he had a purpose to his traps. The one with Detective Carrie did not and were therefore pointless.
> Narrator tries to pronounce "Jovovich's" correctly in two ways, fails both (the J in her last name is pronounced like a Y).
The ending of H20 was dumb. If it was really wasn't Michael, the guy still had a free arm and could have taken the mask off. That part was a cheap cop out.
Jason goes to hell is the movie that ties Friday the 13th and Evil Dead
Why are you talking about Scream 3 but you're showing Scream 2? I'm confused.
I'm glad someone else saw this. I thought I was going crazy.
I am one of the weirdos that like Blair Witch 2: Book of Shadows.
I really like Book of Shadows
You're not alone my friend 😊
I'm a proud "weirdo" too lol
I am also a fan. In fact this video reminded me of it and I'm about to watch it right now.
Scream 3 had a number of issues plaguing production. It was shot after Columbine school shooting and was forced to tone it down.
Scream 3 had too much studio interference and rewrites and it ruined the movie
hahaha "Halloween - the search for more money", love the Spaceballs reference
I would have left that woman too sorry! 28 weeks later pissed me off at the wife not the man!
Same, but it doesn’t annoy me, I understand why mum didn’t want to leave the child. I would’ve ran like the wind just like he did haha
The opening of 28 weeks later didn’t piss me off. I was surprised that a character did what he had to do. There is no way he’s fighting off zombies to save his wife. He has kids to think about.
What's next a Teletubbies horror movie? Oops I spoke too soon.....
Yeah i was so sad when detective carrie was killed.. even after completing the challenge it's so unfair.. i thought she was gonna be main protagonist or live for another sequel
Funny thing about Book of Shadows, if it was similar to the original everyone would have complained about that. Hello, Blair Witch 2016 anyone?
Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
Agreed. I think Book of Shadows is a very underrated movie, and I will die on that hill. Just making another FF movie would have been so boring, BoS takes a really interesting, meta look at the hype generated by the original film. Of course, the execution is more than a little wobbly, none of the characters are terribly interesting, and the time travel plot device thingy is woefully underutilised, but considering how much hate it gets it's actually surprisingly ok, with a lot of great late nineties camp value. The 2016 version, on the other hand, not so much. And let's face it, with a movie with a premise as thin as BWP, it was pretty unlikely we were ever going to get a truly great sequel...
@@oliverholmes-gunning5372 I'm surprised people haven't grown more fond of it over time.
@@oliviav.3565 yeah, I'm also surprised it never found its cult following, it seems like the exact kind of movie that would be appreciated more on its own terms as time went on, once the hype around the original movie died
I have to disagree with 288 weeks later. I think that was the most human reaction someone could have in an impossible situation. I'm so kind and empathetic that I doubt I'd have the courage to do what Don did, I would have probably just stayed and died myself in the desperate hope to save everyone.
Thats alot of weeks later.😊
You forgot to tell us how humble you are too 😂
@@jeremybeckett6 Sorry for the typo, I have early onset Parkinsons, so sometimes I hit the sake key twice. As bad as it is, I'm 32 years old now, I probably won't live to see 45.
@@flithbrinhave you seen demons (1985)? It’s free on CZcams, fantastic movie.
@@flithbrin I'm sorry to hear that. I was just ribbing you anyway friend. Just a lighthearted bit of taking the piss my guy. I hope you are living your best life for now anyway 👍
They had the right person cast for Freddy in the remake but the script flopped. It could've been so good but nope...they screwed up royally.
Cotton Weary? You mean that guy who wasnt in the 1st movie and barely in the 2nd was a "beloved" character? Personally, I wasn't shocked or upset at all when he died. He had cannon fodder written all over him.
Alien 3 on the other hand...
As bad as Jason takes Manhattan is, the Final Friday is levels worse.
10 horror sequels or reboots that pissed people off.
Fixed it for you.
I've never understood the love for Cotton in the Scream franchise. He was a moral-less bastard who literally put his fame above people's lives, even Sidney's.
Yeah, I was like, "people liked him?"
Right? I mean, in Scream 2, he literally blackmailed Sidney into doing a TV interview with him -- all but threatening to let Mrs Loomis kill her if not.@@Dondingo4
The opening for 28 Weeks Later didn't piss me off, it really just made me sad; Don's in a no-win scenario, and he makes a snap decision with the situation he's thrust into and the information he has available to him. He makes the right decision, and it's only by a literal billions to one anomaly that his choice can be called into question. Given what we know about the Rage virus from the series, there was nothing else he could have done but stayed and died with everyone else.
Seriously, f- the wife. She expected him to what, save every kid they came across until he died?
Paxton's death in Hostel pt 2
"oh no we made our protagonist too badass and now the human traffickers don't look cool. Let's kill him and replace him with a generic Final Girl"
Also yeah fuck Saw 3 for a lot of reasons but killing Kerry is the worst. Love how they gave her no focus atvall despite being there from the first movie while every male cop around her got a film dedicated to them as the protagonist (or antagonist)
Jacob's Ladder pissed me off.
Calling Halloween:H2O Halloween: H20 is blowing my minding lmao
IM SO SICK OF THE SCHITTY " THE FLY " MOVIE!!!
Amazing video,fantastic job.
I'm clearly in a minority here, based on other people's comments, but I really liked Cotton (probably because I liked Live Schreiber a lot). His moral ambiguity made him quite interesting. He wasn't a psychopath, but he wasn't a Boy Scout either. I really hated him getting killed in the beginning of Scream 3 (along with the stupidity of the new voice machine). I wouldn't necessarily have minded Cotton dying later in the film, but having him die right away was just a waste of an established character.
Well somebody is either a huge Cotton or Liev Schreiber fan... lol He's basically IMO a red herring in all the Scream movies. That was his total purpose in the franchise. Not that it's a bad thing. Personally I did not latch on to his character in any way, except that Schreiber's Intensity in the 2nd movie. But that was again just to have his character be considered in the misdirection on who the killer was. Scream 3 has my least favorite opening scene so far in the entire franchise. Yes, it was about cutting loose ends and reigniting Sydney's already revving up anxiety, but that as well as his character just falls flat for me. The actor is great. I just didn't care about Cotton much.
I don't know every Horror fan. But this is news to me he's considered such a complex and interesting "favorite" character in the series.
I liked him enough to be disappointed.
I feel like I’ve seen this video before…
You can't hate Don for being a coward. You CAN hate him for being a dick, coming in and kissing his wife like he didn't abandon her to die and being an IDIOT for kissing her and getting infected!
Is it cowardly to run from a horde of infected maniacs?
@@CitizenofAucklandSilentAudits its cowardly to abandon your wife to them
Everytime i see lovely Dina Meyer dying in movies is feel bad...fe. Starhip Troopers, Saw3, Federal Protection...
Alien 3 Alien 3 Alien 3 Alien 3 Alien 3 Alien 3 Alien 3 Alien 3 Alien 3 Alien 3 Alien 3 Alien 3 and Alien 3
A Nightmare on Elm Street pissed me off immediately when Robert England didn’t play Freddy and the his looks looked like CGI and his voice made me laugh. Then they have the audacity to imply that Freddy was innocent of the crimes the parents accused him of. Granted they fixed it in the end with the pictures and what not. But the implication of Freddy being innocent at all pissed me off!
Robert Englund actually liked the remake. And his burns were actually more accurate to what a real burn victim would look like.
I suppose, at the time, Halloween: Resurrection seemed like a pointless cash grab and that they totally retconned the ending to H20.... But I think that now it's common knowledge that was never meant to be Michael at the end of H20. Heck, if I remember right, the flashback scene in Resurrection showing Michael in the paramedic uniform as the ambulance is speeding out of Hillcrest was actually filmed during H20's production....
Skinkadink or whatever its called needs to be here. I was pissed at myself that I made it 45 minutes in.
How was #1 not Alien3, and how was Alien3 not even on this list? The opening was a slap in the face insult to everyone who loved the second movie, and the remainder of the film wasn't much better.
Re: Blair Witch 2... I actually prefer it to the original. It's not that BW2 was all that great, it's that I despised the original. The characters were stupid and annoying, the plot was boring and derivative, and the found footage thing was a stupid gimmick on which the entire premise relied, and led to the rampant overuse of that gimmick in later films.
Re: 28 Weeks Later... Thank you for mentioning that the infected in the movie are in fact NOT zombies.
I would add the Poltergeist remake to this list. It looked more like a badly filmed reality TV show than a horror movie.
True. Cotton Weary getting bumped off early in Scream 3 was a bad idea. The character had more potential to be kept around longer.
Also, true, I being a huge fan of Dina Meyer, I agree that her being bumped off brutally in Saw 3 made me drop the franchise, it wasnt my cup of tea of horror but as I mentioned I was invested for Dina.
Resident evil final chapter they cut out the Whitehouse fight that pissed me off
Honestly, I didn't think the Elm Street remake was that bad. Though I will say acting like Freddy was wrongfully killed only to predictably reveal that yeah, dude's the monster everyone thought he was was pretty stupid.
BWP (the original) was a ripoff. Anyone who feels like it’s a landmark film is gaslighting himself/herself.
The start of 28 weeks later didn't bother me. And I truly loved the original. The movie might have been a let down in some other ways. But not the start in my opinion
Jason goes to hell does not exist....I am not sure what A.I program you used to create those scenes and info but destroy it now.
Cotton was a "fan favorite"? That's news to me, cause I hardly remember him from the first 2 and I've seen them a dozen times.
Really? I loved Cotton's character. Granted, he's barely in the first Scream, but I found him very interesting in Scream 2.
I will never understand the love for Cotton in the scream films. In the first one, sure, he was wrongly accused, but in the second he was a total creepy asshole to Sydney and actually thought about killing her until he basically forced her into something she didn't want, which is a rape allegory, and it still makes him a complete dick. He also doesn't take no for an answer from Sydney several times in the film, which also fits that's disgusting allegory. In the 3rd one, he's actively flirting with someone on the phone when he think it's a female fan of his despite him having a girlfriend. While he does show that he cares about her, he also seemed like he was willing to cheat on her. He's not a good person, and is one of the biggest asshole victims in the series.
Well damn okay
The fact that you think you know what an allegory is, is already one in itself…
Cotton was always an asshole, Liev Schreiber just did such a good job playing him that no one cared.
You're a sensitive soul 😂 Hannibal Lecter liked eating people, guess what, people liked him. Freddy Krueger was a pedo, guess what, people liked him. Strange you have a problem with Cotton and not Mrs Loomis who was crying out "let me kill her" she's got a knife to Sidney's throat, but your issue is with Cotton 😂
I'm surprised that Halloween III wasn't here! The fact that it wasn't about Michael Myers pissed everybody off back when it was released in the early 80s! Although I've always thought that it was a good movie!!
Not everybody. I loved it.
@@elizabethcox5911, yeah, that's what I'm saying! I think it's a great film, but I have definitely read that when it was released a lot of people were pissed that there was no Michael Myers!
Never watched either Blair Witch movies, but I would rather watch the second one as I'm not a big fan of the found footage style.
I really liked the start of the NOES remake 🤷♂️
Like 2010 nightmare and still hate 28weeks later just because of the way his wife dies so unfair
I personally didn't see what the outrage for the Nightmare reboot was, it followed the story, and was scary? Maybe I need to rewatch it
from what i gathered it’s the new design of his face and the fact they “made” him a pedo (which makes no sense)
@@devo1967 oh, he went from murdering and screwing kids, to doing the same thing with a new actor? ha
@@devo1967He was a pedo in the original story too. They were simply so subtle about it, you didn’t notice.
really.. IT chapter 2 isn't worth a slot.. that movie's opening scene alone made my blood biol which is rare given i'm usually pretty chill during horror. another for me is the opening scene for the house of wax remake.
Cotton was never meant to be a main character.
I'm so confuzzled. What is "retcon"???
Don't forget Dewey died 3 times by scream 3!
I'm sorry but I didn't care that cotton dying in scream 3
Me neither. It even made sense for the guy falsely accused of murdering Sidney’s mother, to be the opening kill, in the last movie of the original trilogy.
Cotton was neither popular nor beloved. He almost killed Sid because she wouldnt do an interview with him.
I disagree with The Fly II being on the list. Considering Gina Davis refused to return, I think they wrote the character off in a believable way. They also put in enough effort to find someone who looked a LOT like Gina Davis for the scene.
This countdown p*ssed me off... ;D
I'm sorry but Det. Carey's death in Saw III was perfect. It was meant to drive home the fact that Jigsaw's apprentice don't play by their teacher's rules. Jigsaw doesn't kill, he gives people a choice. But Amanda and Hoffman are killers, through and through
Um… Jigsaw is entirely a killer. Bombers and arsonists are still responsible for the lives they take. Wouldn’t matter if they happen to give their captives a heads up that they have about 1 minute to escape or die. Also, HE designs every trap which are designed to kill, and it’s HIS voice on every tape talking to the specific victims he chooses for the flimsiest of reasons (ex. 2 guys unknowingly dating the same girl).
He even called the rack in part 3 his favorite and that guy had zero choice in if he could live. Others who were also given no choice or chance to live were the other victims of part 3, the person he made Amanda kill in her bear trap to get a key, the employees on a shotgun carousel, the wife and son of the fraud from part 7, etc. Kramer also sliced the neck of the Asian detective in part 1 before leading him into a shotgun booby trap.
Charles Manson and Hitler didn’t physically kill anyone either but they (like Jigsaw) created/designed/commanded various circumstances that resulted in the deaths of many many innocents.
Try watching the films again (or even a kill count CZcams video) with all of that in mind.
@@TalentCaldwell I was quoting his own effed up logic. It is LITERALLY a direct quote from the films. Maybe you should try watching them again
@@bretth342 I know the films extraordinarily well so I am aware of his ideology. However you did NOT leave the statement in quotes (“”) and instead just stated it. Try using proper punctuation if you want people to read your comments as intended. Also try re-reading your own text as it is written (without the quotes or periods you didn’t include) and recognize how normal people would read that. Don’t be a wise@ss while showcasing a deficiency.
Half of the films on this list suffered from a troubled production.
Unpopular opinion: the Blair Witch 2 was better than the first one. Maybe it’s just because I can’t stand found footage films (they make me dizzy), or maybe because I found the original to be terribly boring. I’m not saying Book of Shadows was a masterpiece, but I enjoyed it a lot more 🤷🏻♀️
The original Blair Witch bored me too.
I've never heard anyone call it "H twenty" before. It's supposed to be pronounced "H two oh" like, water
I for one like blair witch 2 way more than the 1st one
Disagreeing with What Culture after a long time. But A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010) - the opening scene was crazy good. Set the tone right away for me and my friends. The movie was not iconic as the original, obviously, but the opening scene did not deserve to be on the list.
Jason goes to hell - I quite like the FBI sting bit. The rest is awful, but I quite like that the beginning was something different.
I didn't mind the first scene in Nightmare 2010. It's not great, but I didn't think it was a terrible intro.
Completely disagree with a couple of these. Book of Shadows while not great was still a good movie and the fact that it wasn't found footage is what made it good. I don't understand the hype behind Blair Witch Project. I watched that in the theater and the most entertaining part was I got to scare a group of teens sitting in front of me by scratching their chair during the climax. I found the whole movie stupid and boring. And as more movies followed the format, IMO the entire found footage style is asinine and makes things even less believable. All the stuff going on around them no one is going to keep holding onto a video camera.
I feel the Nightmare on Elm Street remake get a lot of undeserved hate. They took it back to serious horror roots and eliminated the campiness of the later installments. They threw in some good homages to the original. And I don't see an issue with jumping into the horror a bit quicker in the intro. We got a quick introduction to what Freddy was capable from the jump. The character is so well known that we didn't really need a build up to get to him killing.
I agree entirely about Blair Witch. It's a terrible movie built entirely around a single gimmick (found footage) and a really well done marketing campaign, neither of which makes up for bad acting and a terrible script. I'd comment on the cinematography too, but with that gimmick there wasn't any.
I prefer Blair witch 2. I HATED the found footage shakey camera bs from the very beginning. The second one was a huge improvement
Who calls it Halloween: H20 H-Twenty? Wtf
Don did nothing wrong in “28 Weeks Later.” He was left with two choices to choose from in a split second: 1. Get the hell out of there and remain alive for his kids, and 2. Stick around, die, and make his kids orphans, all to fulfill a fake standard of nobility imposed by audience members, at least most of whom have probably never had to make split second life or death decisions that would either result in a bad outcome or a worse outcome.
its giving the writer just didn't like these films and made excuses to make the list...
Don was in the right. The wife shouldn't have risked their lives over a random kid.
❤ good evening everyone let love last longer 🎉❤❤❤❤❤❤😂
Hostel 2 pissed me off. If y'all seen the first one, you'll understand why.
GFYS!
I've seen everything on this list except for Brahms: The Boy 2 (which I purposely avoided), and I actually liked most of the other movies except Halloween: Resurrection, which was terrible, and ANOES 2010, which not only started bad, but got consistently worse throughout. Considering how legendary the original was, made on a budget of $1 million, ANOES 2010 has to be one of the worst remakes of all time and it didn't do itself any favors by making Freddy a you-know-what.
Apparently he was a ''you-know-what'' in the script for the original but it was changed due to the highly publicised cases of child interference in California around the time the original was made
@@jimmyjams86 I saw interviews with Wes Craven over this and it sounded like it was a very brief consideration, but he axed it altogether because he felt it was unnecessary. And if it had remained in the script, I don't think the franchise would have been as successful as it was, especially with Freddy becoming a pop-culture icon in the 80s.
I don't think I'd consider the RE movies horror movies given how action heavy they are.
I thought Jason goes to hell was pretty cool. A different way to tell a Jason story.