Personally I think if I had to go without one of Salah and Haaland, it would probably be Salah. Lots of midfield options and we don't know how Salah will play under the new manager. Unfortunately the fixtures are so good, I feel like I am being pushed into owning him.
@@mr.lucien2876 GW2... yup, won't deny it - it's a big risk going without him. However, I have Foden and Palmer AND I'm captaining Isak at home to S'oton that day. I think I'm covered adequately.
Good video. Great information how to build teams. I did my first draft yesterday and have Haaland, Watkins, Isak, Salah, Gordon, Eze, Konsa and Martinez
What do you think of this draft Raya Gvardiol Burn Mykolenko Salah foden palmer Eze Hudson-Odoi Isak Watkins Turner Konsa hardwood-bellis and Ladapo? 😊
son>foden , pickford>raya , wood>watkins , gordon> hudson odoi , gabriel> mykolenko+konsa (son better goal threat, wood is a bargain+pens, raya too $$$, better to have starting cbs with points than two 4.5s, obvs gordon better,
Your my new leader. Thanks for spending some time on what seems obvious to me, a flexible non-Halland, non-Salah team. In the US we play fantasy for real money, and the serious players know the value of non-template teams. Since it is now easier to "bank" transfers, how about having two 4.5 goalkeepers to rotate?
Thanks for a useful video. Price points and structure is what I'm mostly thinking about myself at this point. 1. A couple of first thoughts is how many good 4.5 defenders we are spoiled with this season. 2. Even at a discount price at 5.5 for Joa Pedro - it feels like if you go Isak + Watkins, you'd probably want it for Havertz, Gakpo/Darwin or someone else? 3. I see almost no team with Arsenal midfielders in them, and when they do they think Ødegaard can cover Saka. Saka scored 40 pts more than Ø last season. Is this because we want the likes of Gordon, Nkunku in? I think Nkunku is a trap - better to wait and see and go Bailey or MGW instead. Btw, what's your preferred formation / line-up? I'm thinking of going both Haaland + Salah and sell Haaland for either GW3 or GW4 to get Watkins in.
I will be going no Haaland and no Salah I think. That Haaland vs Ipswich fixture does scare me but this is the first season that we can really take risks and be more individual without being punished so much. After my somewhat disastrous season last time, why not?
Out of these 3 teams what would you pick Fabianski Turner Porro Saliba Konsa Faes H-Bellis Saka Palmer Ødegaard Foden Winks Toney Watkins Isak Pickford Henderson Porro Gvardiol Konsa Andersen H-Bellis Saka Palmer Odegaard Eze Winks Havertz Watkins Isak Pickford Henderson Maatsen Gvardiol Konsa Porro Ake Saka Ødegaard Eze Gordon Fatawu Havertz Watkins Isak Think they're all interesting choices
I would lean away from Toney and Havertz. For Toney, there are still transfer rumours and there are better options for the 7.5M. Could downgrade to joao pedro and spend rest in midfield. Also, lack of Salah/Haaland can cost you in captaincy and especially in GW1+2 where they both play ipswich. Havertz could be good later on however, previous season stats are inflated due to MID status despite playing majority of matches up front. Also, Arsenal fixtures aren't great to start. Neither of Fabianski or Turner are nailed which could be problematic. Porro is not great to start off with due to poor fixtures for Spurs. Ake is also not nailed to start for city. Overall 4 Suggestions 1. Look at either Haaland or Salah due to easy fixtures. At minimum have a City midfielder such as Foden if no Haaland and if not Salah, TAA is a must imo. 2. There are many great 4.5M defenders that are nailed and have favorable fixtures which can allow for more budget in MIDs and FWDs. You could go for 1 or 2 premiums but make sure to not overspend. Would lean towards Saliba/Gvardiol/Trent for Premium defender. 3. For attackers, you should aim to select from Watkins/Isak/Haaland/Joao Pedro/Wood. Look out for Joao injury and Forest picking up a new Striker. Forest have great fixtures to start with. 4. In net, look at Sanchez/Petrovic as they are 4.5M and hold part of Chelsea defense. Look at preseason to see who is the No1 under Maresca. At the end of the day it's your choice, but these would be my suggestions.
salah isnt on a pedistle hes getting older didint have his best year hes a system merchant under klopp and now slot is coming in and haaland or isak plus watkins 2 players who will hit 20 goals and watkins gets assists is better then haaland
@@troysander5731 I mean yea not denying that, palmer also had more than haaland yet haaland is 15m. Still think u would take haaland if he was 12m despite less output than Palmer
Personally I think if I had to go without one of Salah and Haaland, it would probably be Salah. Lots of midfield options and we don't know how Salah will play under the new manager. Unfortunately the fixtures are so good, I feel like I am being pushed into owning him.
It's a no Haaland, no Salah draft for me. OMG... it gives me so many options it's a no-brainer!
You need one of them it's the capacity that bags all the points can't reply on likes of saka foden parmer
Seems like a no brainer until haaland bags 3 against ipswitch
GW1 and 2 is gonna be so fun man, if the ppl claiming no Salah and Haaland actually do it come the 16th.
@@mr.lucien2876 GW2... yup, won't deny it - it's a big risk going without him. However, I have Foden and Palmer AND I'm captaining Isak at home to S'oton that day.
I think I'm covered adequately.
This is exactly why they made Halaand £15m 😅
Good video. Great information how to build teams. I did my first draft yesterday and have Haaland, Watkins, Isak, Salah, Gordon, Eze, Konsa and Martinez
You are one of the most underrated FPL content creators on CZcams. I have been following for a while and you are always on point!
having luiz Diaz + 4.5m defender or arnold + semenyo
What do you think of this draft
Raya
Gvardiol Burn Mykolenko
Salah foden palmer Eze Hudson-Odoi
Isak Watkins
Turner Konsa hardwood-bellis and Ladapo? 😊
son>foden , pickford>raya , wood>watkins , gordon> hudson odoi , gabriel> mykolenko+konsa (son better goal threat, wood is a bargain+pens, raya too $$$, better to have starting cbs with points than two 4.5s, obvs gordon better,
@@fanetravieso No Haaland requires Man city MID to cover. Spurs fixtures are awful so son is risky.
Your my new leader. Thanks for spending some time on what seems obvious to me, a flexible non-Halland, non-Salah team. In the US we play fantasy for real money, and the serious players know the value of non-template teams. Since it is now easier to "bank" transfers, how about having two 4.5 goalkeepers to rotate?
Thanks for a useful video. Price points and structure is what I'm mostly thinking about myself at this point.
1. A couple of first thoughts is how many good 4.5 defenders we are spoiled with this season.
2. Even at a discount price at 5.5 for Joa Pedro - it feels like if you go Isak + Watkins, you'd probably want it for Havertz, Gakpo/Darwin or someone else?
3. I see almost no team with Arsenal midfielders in them, and when they do they think Ødegaard can cover Saka. Saka scored 40 pts more than Ø last season. Is this because we want the likes of Gordon, Nkunku in? I think Nkunku is a trap - better to wait and see and go Bailey or MGW instead.
Btw, what's your preferred formation / line-up?
I'm thinking of going both Haaland + Salah and sell Haaland for either GW3 or GW4 to get Watkins in.
Defo no haarland and Salah for me gives so many options even ran through few AI checkers and no haarland and Salah squads always come out higher 😊
Do they take into account captaincy?
@@TheChewsta no none of them do just base on points scored each week as team as whole
Smashed it mate. Loved your thoughts and ideas. Nice to know my thoughts are similar to yours
Would it be possible for you to include how that each individual draft would have scored last year for a comparison?
my best draft is my Haaland, salah , odegaard draft and its most likely week 1 team
I will be going no Haaland and no Salah I think. That Haaland vs Ipswich fixture does scare me but this is the first season that we can really take risks and be more individual without being punished so much. After my somewhat disastrous season last time, why not?
It’s really a haaland question of GW1… if he cooks can you find 6M for GW2 or not.
i will go without Haaland and going with Watkins, Isak, Salah, Palmer, Saka.
@fplfan, do you have a mini league?
Am going with haaland palmer Watkins and isak what do you think mate?
Im gonna fo two teams, one with trent, haaland and trent other with Saka, foden , palmer
You seem to favor Robinson. How would you rate him against Burn and Mykolenko?
Henderson
White Mykolenko Anderden
Bailey Rogers Gordon Palmer
Watkins Haarland Izak
Bench Turner Hudson Odoi Burn +4m defender
Andersen I mean
Eze and burn or Trent + 4.5 mid?
Out of these 3 teams what would you pick
Fabianski Turner
Porro Saliba Konsa Faes H-Bellis
Saka Palmer Ødegaard Foden Winks
Toney Watkins Isak
Pickford Henderson
Porro Gvardiol Konsa Andersen H-Bellis
Saka Palmer Odegaard Eze Winks
Havertz Watkins Isak
Pickford Henderson
Maatsen Gvardiol Konsa Porro Ake
Saka Ødegaard Eze Gordon Fatawu
Havertz Watkins Isak
Think they're all interesting choices
I would lean away from Toney and Havertz. For Toney, there are still transfer rumours and there are better options for the 7.5M. Could downgrade to joao pedro and spend rest in midfield. Also, lack of Salah/Haaland can cost you in captaincy and especially in GW1+2 where they both play ipswich. Havertz could be good later on however, previous season stats are inflated due to MID status despite playing majority of matches up front. Also, Arsenal fixtures aren't great to start. Neither of Fabianski or Turner are nailed which could be problematic. Porro is not great to start off with due to poor fixtures for Spurs. Ake is also not nailed to start for city.
Overall 4 Suggestions
1. Look at either Haaland or Salah due to easy fixtures. At minimum have a City midfielder such as Foden if no Haaland and if not Salah, TAA is a must imo.
2. There are many great 4.5M defenders that are nailed and have favorable fixtures which can allow for more budget in MIDs and FWDs. You could go for 1 or 2 premiums but make sure to not overspend. Would lean towards Saliba/Gvardiol/Trent for Premium defender.
3. For attackers, you should aim to select from Watkins/Isak/Haaland/Joao Pedro/Wood. Look out for Joao injury and Forest picking up a new Striker. Forest have great fixtures to start with.
4. In net, look at Sanchez/Petrovic as they are 4.5M and hold part of Chelsea defense. Look at preseason to see who is the No1 under Maresca.
At the end of the day it's your choice, but these would be my suggestions.
When are you gonna rank teams
Why am I seeing no one going for Son?
Muniz or gvardvol
Munoz I like £1m cheaper mate!!
@@FPLFan no muniz the forward
@@FPLFan Hahahaha
salah isnt on a pedistle hes getting older didint have his best year hes a system merchant under klopp and now slot is coming in and haaland or isak plus watkins 2 players who will hit 20 goals and watkins gets assists is better then haaland
30 g/a in 28 starts. Don’t forget he had afcon. And has great fixtures and usually performs the best at the start
@@tariqammar2022 palmer had the same output lol
@@troysander5731 I mean yea not denying that, palmer also had more than haaland yet haaland is 15m. Still think u would take haaland if he was 12m despite less output than Palmer
1st comment 😂❤
😊❤️🤘🖖👊💪🍻
❤️
join head2head ndteme